Re: Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11

[khobar]

"TRUTH" > wrote in message
...
> Tenured Physics Professor Steven E Jones gave two seminars to hundreds of
> people on WTC controlled demolitions and how the government's version of
> events "defies physics". The Feb 1st seminar can be viewed on Google
> Video, or downloaded to your computer.
>
>
> The following is a excerpt from Jones' PEER REVIEWED paper:
>
> "I presented my objections to the "official" theory at a seminar at BYU
> on September 22, 2005, to about sixty people. I also showed evidence and
> scientific arguments for the controlled demolition theory. In attendance
> were faculty from Physics, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering,
> Electrical Engineering, Psychology, Geology, and Mathematics - and
> perhaps other departments as I did not recognize all of the people
> present. A local university and college were represented (BYU and Utah
> Valley State College).
>
> The discussion was vigorous and lasted nearly two hours. It ended only
> when a university class needed the room. After presenting the material
> summarized here, including actually looking at and discussing the
> collapses of WTC 7 and the Towers, only one attendee disagreed (by hand-
> vote) that further investigation of the WTC collapses was called for.
> The next day, the dissenting professor said he had further thought about
> it and now agreed that more investigation was needed."
>
>
>
> Professor Jones now has dozens of people suporting him. His finding are
> based on scientific evidence and logical reasoning.

Wow...dozens of supporters.

I'm convinced.

Paul Nixon

[Darkwing]

"TRUTH" > wrote in message
...
> "khobar" > wrote in
> news:9P8Lf.4247$Sp2.1482@fed1read02:
>
>>
>> "TRUTH" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Tenured Physics Professor Steven E Jones gave two seminars to
>>> hundreds of people on WTC controlled demolitions and how the
>>> government's version of events "defies physics". The Feb 1st seminar
>>> can be viewed on Google Video, or downloaded to your computer.
>>>
>>>
>>> The following is a excerpt from Jones' PEER REVIEWED paper:
>>>
>>> "I presented my objections to the "official" theory at a seminar at
>>> BYU on September 22, 2005, to about sixty people. I also showed
>>> evidence and scientific arguments for the controlled demolition
>>> theory. In attendance were faculty from Physics, Mechanical
>>> Engineering, Civil Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Psychology,
>>> Geology, and Mathematics - and perhaps other departments as I did not
>>> recognize all of the people present. A local university and college
>>> were represented (BYU and Utah Valley State College).
>>>
>>> The discussion was vigorous and lasted nearly two hours. It ended
>>> only when a university class needed the room. After presenting the
>>> material summarized here, including actually looking at and
>>> discussing the collapses of WTC 7 and the Towers, only one attendee
>>> disagreed (by hand- vote) that further investigation of the WTC
>>> collapses was called for. The next day, the dissenting professor said
>>> he had further thought about it and now agreed that more
>>> investigation was needed."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Professor Jones now has dozens of people suporting him. His finding
>>> are based on scientific evidence and logical reasoning.
>>
>> Wow...dozens of supporters.
>>
>> I'm convinced.
>>
>> Paul Nixon
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> Explain these facts:
>


I did.

----------------------------------------------
DW

[mrtravel]

TRUTH wrote:
>
> Explain these facts:
>
> FACT: Never before in world history has a steel framed building
> completely collapsed from fire. Not before 9/11, not after 9/11.
> Never!

How many skyscrapers have been hit by fully fueled 757 and 767 aircraft
before 9/11

> FACT: WTC 7 was ***NOT*** hit by an airplane!

You got me there, but then there isn't anyone claiming otherwise, is there?

>
> FACT: WTC 7 collapsed from "fire and debris", according to the government

Wow.. do you think it might have got some of the fire and debris from
another building, or 2?

>
> FACT: The WTC 7 collapse mimicked controlled demolition, as did the
> Towers. They all collapsed almost symmetrically, near free fall speed,
> into their own footprints.

Free fall?

>
> FACT: There were small puffs of smoke (known as squibs) coming out of
> all three buildings, a sign of controlled demolitions.

Why would they need to demo WTC 7?

>
> FACT: Romero recanted just a few days later without giving any scientific
> explanation as to why. He was then promoted.

Who knows, do you?
Was he scheduled for a promotion? Can you prove he wasn't?

>
> FACT: WTC 7 leaseholder Larry Silverstein bought a 99 yr lease on the
> entire WTC complex just six weeks before 9/11, which just happened
> to include terrorist attack insurance

Do you have evidence the previous leaseholder didn't have terrorist
attack insurance?

>
> FACT: Silverstein said WTC7 was "pulled" on a PBS documentary
>
> FACT: In that same documentary, a construction worker used the word
> "pull" as slang for "professionally demolish"

Oh... Silverstein is a construction worker?

>
> FACT: The WTC7 fire alarm was put into "test mode" the morning of 9/11

Given the fact that the two main buildings were hit by big planes, do
you think the people in WTC7 needed an alarm?

>
> FACT: Silverstein was absent from his 88th floor office in the
> North Tower on the morning of 9/11 due to a "doctors appointment"

WOW... That proves what?

>
> FACT: The FDNY Chief Of Safely told an NBC reporter there might be a
> secondary device in the building

There "might"

>