Peter R.
March 1st 06, 01:01 AM
Thanks to a discussion in a LiveATC.net's forum, I was unaware that there
were actually different categories of ILS hold short lines. What is
puzzling to me is that there are examples of the CAT III hold short lines
being closer to the runway served by the CAT III approach than the CAT I
hold short line is to the runway served by the CAT I approach. At least at
first glance, this seems backwards.
For example, in looking at the San Francisco airport diagram, here:
http://www.myairplane.com/databases/approach/pdfs/00375AD.PDF
I realize that the CAT III approach only serves RWY 28 R at KSFO, but it
still appears that the CAT III lines are closer to the runway. Could this
be because the CAT III ILS transmitter is located between the two parallel
runways, whereas the ILS tower serving the CAT I ILS to RWY 28 L is on the
left side of RWY 28 L?
--
Peter
were actually different categories of ILS hold short lines. What is
puzzling to me is that there are examples of the CAT III hold short lines
being closer to the runway served by the CAT III approach than the CAT I
hold short line is to the runway served by the CAT I approach. At least at
first glance, this seems backwards.
For example, in looking at the San Francisco airport diagram, here:
http://www.myairplane.com/databases/approach/pdfs/00375AD.PDF
I realize that the CAT III approach only serves RWY 28 R at KSFO, but it
still appears that the CAT III lines are closer to the runway. Could this
be because the CAT III ILS transmitter is located between the two parallel
runways, whereas the ILS tower serving the CAT I ILS to RWY 28 L is on the
left side of RWY 28 L?
--
Peter