View Full Version : zooms SnF mini rant
ChuckSlusarczyk
March 28th 06, 01:55 PM
Here's zooms annual Sun n Fun rant.Tho not as raging as in previous years. This
was posted in ANN 03/28/06
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
quote "Expect coverage from
Editor-in-Chief Jim Campbell, as well. Just because he's been
(illegally) banned from the Sun 'n Fun grounds in an apparent
attempt to muzzle his coverage of safety and other issues, doesn't
mean that he won't be intimately involved with the show's goings-on
(even though this nonsense has gotten so out of control that
Sun 'n Fun won't even let him cross to the FAA building - in
apparent violation of Federal Law!). Jim's a better test and
evaluation pilot than any other publication has [as we've been told
by experts], and he'll be wringing information out of a number of
ships, just outside of the DMZ that surrounds Lakeland. " unquote
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I love the part where jim says "jims a better test and evaluation pilot than any
other publication has (as we've been told by experts)"
What experts?? LOL!! Lets see a list. zooms never recieved any writing awards as
his peers have. If he's so good why doesn't he have a single award for his
expert flight test evaluations? What a phony? a hero in his own mind. LOL
Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret
"you can pull the sheep over some peoples wool,but you can't catch a canary with
greasy hands" anon
--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth
Denny
March 28th 06, 07:35 PM
I remember the rant where he saw himself as the last pilot in the USA,
getting into his composite stealth aircraft with the ceramic engine.
etc., for his final suicide flight... Talk about schizophreniform
ideation with delusions, jeez...
denny
BobR
March 29th 06, 04:35 AM
All these years that Sun-N-Fun has been illegally keeping him from the
event and the grounds but he hasn't been able to do anything about it?
Could that be possible or could it be possible that they do indeed have
the legal right to tell him from entering private property.
It hasn't stopped him from using the event to continue and serve
lawsuits against some of his former advertisers. I can't help but
wonder which of them will get served this year.
DABEAR
March 29th 06, 05:54 PM
Actually, I hear he's going to be testing a new aircraft shortly. His
nose has finally gotten long enough that they can slap a propeller on
it and he can take himself for a test spin.
I suggest that we find someone to Christen him by breaking a bottle of
Champagne on his head...
....then we can invite the FAA over, tell them "Look who's about to go
flying..." and invite them to take a whiff.
Oh! The humanity!
BobR
March 30th 06, 12:33 AM
Just read his latest rant and all I could do was laugh at the stupidity
of it all. I can just see the police being taken to the hospital
emergency room doubled over in pain from laughing their asses off. Gee
officer, this guy taped a letter on my door and it scared the crap out
of me, defaced my property, and I want to press charges. What a rant!
Dan
March 30th 06, 01:41 AM
BobR wrote:
> Just read his latest rant and all I could do was laugh at the stupidity
> of it all. I can just see the police being taken to the hospital
> emergency room doubled over in pain from laughing their asses off. Gee
> officer, this guy taped a letter on my door and it scared the crap out
> of me, defaced my property, and I want to press charges. What a rant!
>
The thing to do is have a few people with still and video cameras
follow zoom from the moment he arrives in the vicinity until he leaves.
A short documentary can then be pieced together with the appropriate
soundtrack: crying babies.
I dunno if it would sell, but I'd like a copy.
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
ChuckSlusarczyk
March 30th 06, 04:15 AM
In article om>, BobR says...
>
>Just read his latest rant and all I could do was laugh at the stupidity
>of it all. I can just see the police being taken to the hospital
>emergency room doubled over in pain from laughing their asses off. Gee
>officer, this guy taped a letter on my door and it scared the crap out
>of me, defaced my property, and I want to press charges. What a rant!
>
One would have thought that SnF blew open his door with C4, rolled in a grenade
and shot all the wounded.I bet the cops had a hard time keeping a straight face
while he was describing these criminal acts.Must have been some really good tape
to peel paint like that and the trauma ,OH THE TRAUMA of it all.What an ordeal
....for the cops LOL!!!
Chuck S
--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth
Morgans
March 30th 06, 06:17 AM
"Dan" > wrote \\
> The thing to do is have a few people with still and video cameras
> follow zoom from the moment he arrives in the vicinity until he leaves.
> A short documentary can then be pieced together with the appropriate
> soundtrack: crying babies.
>
> I dunno if it would sell, but I'd like a copy.
His paranoid filled reaction to being followed and filmed would be worth the
price of admission, in itself! ROFLMAO!
--
Jim in NC
anon
April 10th 06, 05:31 AM
When I was Zoomed by phone, the issue of his credibility as a test pilot
was one topic. I told him that while he might consider himself a
test pilot, a roomful of test pilots would not.
If you consistently find yourself on the wrong side of a consensus, it
might be you.
-------------
>
> I love the part where jim says "jims a better test and evaluation pilot than any
> other publication has (as we've been told by experts)"
>
DABEAR
April 10th 06, 09:20 AM
What surprises me is that the Rocket Racing League is so desperate to
give him credibility, they have gone as far as to indicate in his bio
that he tested something like 1100 aircraft since the age of thirteen
and gave evaluations on them. I questioned who cares what a thirteen
year old's evaluation of an aircraft is three years before it's legal
for him to have a license?
Now, Jim's bio is removed from the Rocket Racing League site, as I
believe soon, so will Jimbo the Rocket Clown be removed.
If these people are looking for credibility, they won't gain it by
having the likes of Jim Campbell with them, and for that matter, Mike
Houghton of the Reno Air Racing Association. He has all but killed the
races, which he publicly stated last year will be around for eight more
years, though estimates are less than five. Houghton and his crew sold
the land to the Airport Authority of Washoe County, and the latter
wants to build an industrial warehousing and manufacturing site on the
racecourse lands. Houghton was a member of the AAWC at the time, so it
equates to land fraud and local FAA bimbos are acting as consultants on
the deal.
In the meantime, RARA and RRL have announced they'll be holding RRL
events at Stead, and Jimbo ~ according to Jimbo ~ is also going to be
flying in the Sport Class beyond the RRL.
Has anybody checked this guy's Flight Physical as of late? Has anyone
checked his Pilot's license? In fact, has anyone checked Jimbo's meds?
Or Jimbo for a relapse?
Truth be told, Jimbo never got well and he's still out there playing
Captain Zoom. Hopefully, the next time he catches something in his
teeth, it will still be an ultra-light and not the leading edge slats
on a Boeing 747, ala PSA in San Diego...
Forget Captain Zoom...Jimbo the Rocket Clown is Captain "Doom" for
sure...only a matter of time, since the FAA continues to sit with its
thumb up one of its A's and allows this clown access to aircraft and
airfields.
And he still waltzes around playing journalist and acting God in real
Aviators' lives, though he has no Journalistic ethics. He won't pursue
stories critical of his "friends" and he'll stab others in the back if
it's to his greedy benefit, including individuals with good cases and
Journalists seeking his help to help others.
Sun N' Fun is correct in banning him from all grounds. He's a
nuissance lawsuit just waiting to happen, and the best way to avoid
that lawsuit is to not let him in. He's a clear danger to himself and
others, including Law Enforcement, Sun N' Fun Staff, Pilots, Vendors,
Press, and the Public. This is NOT the type of individual you want to
allow anywhere near your aircraft.
My two cents...
Mark S. "Bear" Daniels
Publisher
ILIPS Group
Editor
Silver State News Service
RST Engineering
April 10th 06, 03:43 PM
PSA flight 182 in San Diego was a 727, not a 747.
Jim
PSA Employee #521
Hopefully, the next time he catches something in his
> teeth, it will still be an ultra-light and not the leading edge slats
> on a Boeing 747, ala PSA in San Diego...
DABEAR
April 11th 06, 03:07 PM
Which is why I said "ala" PSA...it just means he takes down something
larger with more people...but in the same manner as PSA in San Diego.
The principles are the same. Both aircraft require working leading
edge slats.
The main issue is: we didn't want PSA to happen, but it did. The
government sang and danced their way out of that one, as they will with
Campbell. He currently exists as a threat because of their failures in
following up on his medical condition and continued proximity to
Aviation. His condition is unchanged over time, which means he likely
isn't getting any meds or treatment, and his denial isn't going to make
that situation better. They (the FAA/NTSB) need to get tough with him.
DABEAR wrote:
> Which is why I said "ala" PSA...it just means he takes down something
> larger with more people...but in the same manner as PSA in San Diego.
> The principles are the same. Both aircraft require working leading
> edge slats.
>
> The main issue is: we didn't want PSA to happen, but it did. The
> government sang and danced their way out of that one, as they will with
> Campbell. He currently exists as a threat because of their failures in
> following up on his medical condition and continued proximity to
> Aviation. His condition is unchanged over time, which means he likely
> isn't getting any meds or treatment, and his denial isn't going to make
> that situation better. They (the FAA/NTSB) need to get tough with him.
Mr Bear
Don't forget his zzzoomness once wrote about the day he was flying over
L.A. and saw a flash of light. He turned toward it and watched the
AeroMexico DC9 going down over Cerritus. (sp?) California.
Frank M.Hitlaw
Jakarta,Indonesia
DABEAR wrote:
> Which is why I said "ala" PSA...it just means he takes down something
> larger with more people...but in the same manner as PSA in San Diego.
> The principles are the same. Both aircraft require working leading
> edge slats.
>
> The main issue is: we didn't want PSA to happen, but it did. The
> government sang and danced their way out of that one, as they will with
> Campbell. He currently exists as a threat because of their failures in
> following up on his medical condition and continued proximity to
> Aviation. His condition is unchanged over time, which means he likely
> isn't getting any meds or treatment, and his denial isn't going to make
> that situation better. They (the FAA/NTSB) need to get tough with him.
Mr Bear
Don't forget his zzzoomness once wrote about the day he was flying over
L.A. and saw a flash of light. He turned toward it and watched the
AeroMexico DC9 going down over Cerritus. (sp?) California.
Frank M.Hitlaw
Jakarta,Indonesia
DABEAR
April 11th 06, 07:56 PM
That's one I hadn't heard of...do you recall where he published that?
Has he made any other similar claims? I'd like to compile a list of
his claims for purposes of verification, true or false. I'm going into
Court here shortly in his regards to put a stop to his misconduct once
and for all times.
My e-mail is published so I have no concerns over posting it here:
Please write me there and let me know. That statement is easily
verified true or false, and needless to say, Captain Zoom's history
does not bode well for Truth. But I do like to verify things. One
thing's for sure: since I've become a student of the Zoomster, he's
been an interesting study. However, his abuses are going to end.
DABEAR
April 11th 06, 07:59 PM
The address seems to have gotten eaten up. Just throw in the word
bearz three times and you have it, or you can find the Masthead at the
top of my newspaper at:
www.silverstatenews.com
Click on the link and it will take you to my contact information...all
prior published. No concerns here on contacts...
Richard Riley
April 12th 06, 03:26 PM
http://www.time.com/time/archive/preview/0,10987,144979,00.html
Sep. 15, 1986.
Private Pilot Jim Campbell, flying at 1,500 ft. near Los Angeles, could
not believe his eyes. Looking up, he saw a flash of light 1 1/2 miles
off to the left of his aircraft. The fireball turned into a plume of
black smoke, and Campbell watched in horror as a huge DC-9 airliner
dropped its nose and rolled to its left. Twisting upside down, the
wounded aircraft picked up speed as it plunged toward earth. " Oh!"
shouted Campbell to himself. " Pull her up. Pull her up. Oh, pull her
up!" In the cockpit of Aeromexico Flight 498, Pilot Arturo Valdes Prom
was helpless. Glistening behind him in the noonday sun...
DABEAR
April 13th 06, 08:38 AM
Careful there... That lying ******* will call the cops claiming that
you sent him a death threat.
govern yourself accordingly...
Charlie P
Kewl! For a moment there, I thought the Post Office lost it! <G>
Now, for the next one! How many "Zeros" in the word "Z00M!?" (Trick
Question...I would love to see everyone respond on this one!)
DABEAR
April 13th 06, 08:56 AM
Very interesting...I'll give this a look. Wouldn't that be funny if
Time didn't confirm the source? Right off the bat, ATC tapes would
have collected something of his presence.
I worked Production Control at Douglas at the time that they brought
the rudder and the vertical stablizer in after the accident. No sign
of fire. The photos of the aircraft pretty much confirmed what the
American Airlines DC-10 pilots saw that were behind the aircraft.
There was a trail of smoke, beginning at their altitude down to the
crash site, which was on fire at ground level, but not a plume nor a
fireball. The aircraft that hit the Aeromexico jet didn't burn, and
the Aeromexico jet wasn't a fireball in the photos taken of the
aircraft before it hit. I recently met one of the photographers who
got pictures of the aircraft as it crashed. The crash photography was
published within 24 hours here in Los Angeles. Anyone could have
concocted a story based on the photography.
Apparently Jim did, because there was no fireball as I recall. The
photos should be on the web to refresh my memory. The other
information is verifiable, true or false.
A very interesting story...worth looking into, to be sure.
DABEAR
April 13th 06, 09:09 AM
These are the photos at Air Disaster.Com, a reference for Press
covering Aviaiton Disasters. The first photo shows the trail of smoke
as I described from the pictures I had seen. No fireball. No real
fire until the aircraft hit the ground, which the other two photos show
the aftermath of. Going to review that Time story above. I know for a
fact there are other photos of the DC-9 taken at closer range. No
fireball. No plume of smoke.
The sad thing is, this accident boiled down to a private pilot having a
heart attack, the aircraft straying into LAX airspace while his family
members tried to get control of the aircraft, before impact with the
DC-9. The horizontal stablizer struck the private aircraft and
detached.
http://www.airdisaster.com/photos/am498/photo.shtml
http://www.airdisaster.com/photos/am498/2.shtml
http://www.airdisaster.com/photos/am498/3.shtml
Gig 601XL Builder
April 13th 06, 02:15 PM
"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
> These are the photos at Air Disaster.Com, a reference for Press
> covering Aviaiton Disasters.
Air Disasters is nothing more than place where people can go to see planes
crash. It is NOT a reference site for the press.
Richard Riley
April 13th 06, 03:26 PM
DABEAR wrote:
> Apparently Jim did, because there was no fireball as I recall. The
> photos should be on the web to refresh my memory. The other
> information is verifiable, true or false.
>
> A very interesting story...worth looking into, to be sure.
Bear, I understand where you are and what you're doing. I've been
there myself. Please take it from an old Zoom warrier -
So what?
It doesn't matter how many times we prove beyond all doubt that he lies
in print, about substantial and important issues. About himself,
companies he's pushing or companies he's trying to destroy. We've
proven it so many times we refer to incidents like those in a kind of
shorthand - like where's his son, when did he fly in Ethiopia, what
about the supersonic flight to the funeral, the number of planes he's
flown, injuries at Sun n Fun, etc. The people that have been doing
this for 10 or 15 years know what we're refering to and most of the
details, because they've been so thoroughly discussed.
None of it matters. You can't stop him from publishing, especiallly
now that he no longer has a printing and mailing bill.
Even when it's widely known that he runs advertising that hasn't been
ordered, bills for it, then sues when the bill isn't paid, good people
get sucked into advertising with him initially. Even though it's well
known what Zoom does to people after they quit (and how frequently they
don't get paid) good people like Kevin OBrien and Tim Kern get sucked
into working for him.
It doesn't matter if we prove he claimed he went to Desert Storm as a
reporter for Time Magazine. Or that he claimed the Mini-500 was a well
engineered, well manufactured aicraft before he led the campaing to
destroy it. Or that he was partners with Don Jones, who he later
described as a drug dealer that tried to kill cops. Or that he's
banned by Sun n Fun after years of misbehavior there, including
stiffing the Boys and Girls club for the food they provided for his
party.
None of that matters.
The problem is it doesn't cost much to be a malcontent with a website.
In the extreme case, you could be homeless and on the street, host on
blogspot and maintain one from public library. And there's no law in
America that makes it illegal to be a loonball that's destroying
aviation from the inside, driving good people away.
If you have an entirely new angle, I applaud you. If you are just mad
as hell at him, and are determined that the truth will out, I
understand. But it's been tried before.
Dan
April 13th 06, 05:54 PM
Richard Riley wrote:
> DABEAR wrote:
>
>> Apparently Jim did, because there was no fireball as I recall. The
>> photos should be on the web to refresh my memory. The other
>> information is verifiable, true or false.
>>
>> A very interesting story...worth looking into, to be sure.
>
> Bear, I understand where you are and what you're doing. I've been
> there myself. Please take it from an old Zoom warrier -
>
> So what?
>
> It doesn't matter how many times we prove beyond all doubt that he lies
> in print, about substantial and important issues. About himself,
> companies he's pushing or companies he's trying to destroy. We've
> proven it so many times we refer to incidents like those in a kind of
> shorthand - like where's his son, when did he fly in Ethiopia, what
> about the supersonic flight to the funeral, the number of planes he's
> flown, injuries at Sun n Fun, etc. The people that have been doing
> this for 10 or 15 years know what we're refering to and most of the
> details, because they've been so thoroughly discussed.
>
> None of it matters. You can't stop him from publishing, especiallly
> now that he no longer has a printing and mailing bill.
>
> Even when it's widely known that he runs advertising that hasn't been
> ordered, bills for it, then sues when the bill isn't paid, good people
> get sucked into advertising with him initially. Even though it's well
> known what Zoom does to people after they quit (and how frequently they
> don't get paid) good people like Kevin OBrien and Tim Kern get sucked
> into working for him.
>
> It doesn't matter if we prove he claimed he went to Desert Storm as a
> reporter for Time Magazine. Or that he claimed the Mini-500 was a well
> engineered, well manufactured aicraft before he led the campaing to
> destroy it. Or that he was partners with Don Jones, who he later
> described as a drug dealer that tried to kill cops. Or that he's
> banned by Sun n Fun after years of misbehavior there, including
> stiffing the Boys and Girls club for the food they provided for his
> party.
>
> None of that matters.
>
> The problem is it doesn't cost much to be a malcontent with a website.
> In the extreme case, you could be homeless and on the street, host on
> blogspot and maintain one from public library. And there's no law in
> America that makes it illegal to be a loonball that's destroying
> aviation from the inside, driving good people away.
>
> If you have an entirely new angle, I applaud you. If you are just mad
> as hell at him, and are determined that the truth will out, I
> understand. But it's been tried before.
>
This where yawn comes in and tells us how wrong everyone is, that he
has proof he doesn't have to provide, spews innuendo etc.
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Richard Riley
April 13th 06, 10:34 PM
Dan wrote:
>
> This where yawn comes in and tells us how wrong everyone is, that he
> has proof he doesn't have to provide, spews innuendo etc.
>
> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Well, yes, but so what? So he's a contrarian. If you post that
Elizabeth is the Queen of England he'll answer with a long post about
how the Stewarts should still be on the throne. Yawn, again.
Light GA is, at it's best, barely profitable. Most people in the
industry are in it for the love, not for the money. Zoom takes what
could be a joyous endeavor and squeezes everything good from it. He is
to aviation what a rapist is to sex.
DABEAR
April 14th 06, 03:45 AM
I'll respond to both of the Riley posts and the one from Dan in this
message:
Much of what you guys have fought has not been in the upper levels of
Federal Court dealing with Journalism, Civil Rights Violations,
Racketeering, and most importantly, over 40 counts of Federal Perjury
committed on or about October 17, 2005, in shutting down 56 of my
websites. Until I inadvertantly came across this USENET group and the
websites chronicling Campbell's past behavior, I had a difficult case
before me. Now, this guy's a slam dunk. The more info I get about
him, the easier it will be for the feds to take him down.
That Racketeering has already been charged against him, though the case
ended with the tragic death of the courageous Attorney involved,
supports my cases of Racketeering against him even though the case
apparently never made it to decision. The man's Modus Operandi and his
history are everything. This guy is like a wigged out boomerang that
you throw and comes back to try and kill you. That's his history. He
keeps repeating his crimes and his crimes get worse every five years or
so.
There are crimes that he commits that you claim he cannot be punished
for. On that, you're wrong.
Also, there is a greater issue...not just the crimes you know that he
has committed, but those crimes you don't know he has committed, such
as in terms of fraud, "Undisclosed Conflict of Interest." The Federal
Perjury directed against me, which is provable hands down, is an
entirely new charge...something you mentioned, btw...if I had something
"new." Indeed I do. Conspiracy is a new charge, particularly
considering his Racketeering and his association with other known and
alleged criminals, the latter of which can be proven...and what's
coming up is the first try in that regard. Aiding and abetting the
other conspirators in their crimes. Terrorism, which is precisely what
he conducted against my server in getting me shut down for ten days,
filing a libelous DMCA complaint in which he accused me of everything
you folks have accused him of. Literally, he's taken your charges and
directed them against me and proclaimed himself a lamb.
You folks have so much data that can take this clown down, considering
his latest acts, that it isn't funny. Add them all together and the
charges, not to mention the people making the charges, have strength in
numbers in terms of Class Action (100 or more) and/or Group Action
(Less Than 100) lawsuits.
You've had the power all along to take him down, but you're one, two,
three individuals going after him at a time, and the largest group
apparently the RAH group, but in a defensive stance to the best of my
knowledge.
This guy is a habitual criminal on top of everything else. Does not
want to mend his ways and keeps getting worse. That's a new direction
to focus on.
Yes, you're frustrated with the way the Justice System seems to let him
slide. The larger the group, the greater the impact on the Courts as
to this ONE individual's misconduct.
As for those great guys that are "snookered" into working for him,
O'Brien indicated here at USENET that he was ashamed of his publication
and what Campbell did. Did O'Brien quit?
His people know what he's doing and do nothing to stop him. To me,
that means they're getting some hefty pay and perks causing them to be
corrupted and do nothing or lose their own angle in the industry. That
hurts people worse than what Jim does, in my opinion.
The man needs stopped. Any information I can get to put towards that
purpose is appreciated:
Mark S. "Bear" Daniels
5606 Calhoun Avenue # 5
Van Nuys, CA 91401 USA
It's that simple. If you haven't thrown your hands up in regards to
ending this guy's misconduct, send your materials there or point to
where I can find them online. I'm going into Court against him
shortly, but he's small fish to fry. Just the same, he needs fried
because then I can take his misconduct and direct it against his
co-conspirators, who are equally responsible for him along with the
government.
As for the Cerritos mid-air, if it's the same Jim Campbell ~ as I
highly suspect it is ~ what he did trying to draw attention to himself,
is downright sick and goulish beyond that. My fellow veterans have a
fit when we get these fakes who claim to have been soldiers serving in
some hot combat situation, and were never there. We even have soldiers
claiming the same thing, when they were assigned many miles away and
were never in the action described.
What Campbell has done, if this allegation proves true, is far worse
than any of the above mentioned crimes committed against the veterans
of WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, Beirut, Desert Storm, Operation Iraqi
Freedom and Afghanistan, by the fakes.
Campbell tried to gain fame and notariety ~ even profit ~ on the deaths
of innocents...64 in the air, 15 on the ground, if that charge is true.
He needs to be stopped.
As for "yawn" spewing innuendo, not having to provide proof, etc. ~ all
well and good in public ~ but far different in a Court of Law
investigating him for fraud. Fraud is one of the issues that forces
him to put up or shut up. Perjury convictions can shut his mouth for
good and even better, on a Federal Perjury charge ~ and remember that
I'm alleging over 40 with documentation to back that up ~ up to five
years in prison and astronomical fines.
I can essentially bury him in his own feces with what I've got...but
since he keeps coming back, I think multiple layers of reinforced
concrete (prison) on his figurative "grave" are recommended.
You have my address, all. It's published at my websites and I could
care less about who writes me there, good or bad intent, I have no
fear.
You make the decision...if you info on this clown, send it to me, let
me waste my time dealing with him, if I so choose. Sit in the
grandstands and watch the fight.
He ain't going to last long. No coward does, and the stories about his
cowardice from people with character are more legendary than the
stories this coward tells about himself.
His information, as allegedly provided to Time Magazine, could have led
investigators on a wild goose chase had it not been for 1) the fact it
was a known mid-air and 2) the photos showing the DC-9 was not a
fireball.
Could have left a lot of things open for a number of surviving families
of those onboard both aircraft that would have delayed closure,
possibly, indefinitely.
Somewhere, a ghoul by the name of "Jim Campbell" knows full-well, what
he did. He may as well have gone to the crash site and robbed the
dead. Whoever that "Jim Campbell" is, tried to profit off the dying
and the dead, both.
And that's just one reason why Journalists don't allow other
Journalists to lie. Another is the fact that his lies hurt others,
particularly the living.
Campbell made himself a part of my larger investigations all by himself
via the dirty deal he gave a group of men with just grievances, in
selling them out to benefit from greedy deals he made with Houghton at
Reno and Diamandis in RRL and X-Prize.
I'm not stopping until he's convicted and put away...for the remainder
of his life, if necessary.
This is a very serious matter about a very serious criminal, and
criminals more serious in their misconduct than just he. Doing the
expedient thing won't bring them to justice, nor make my life better by
dropping the ball and saying, "Oh well." Beyond that, I have a sworn
oath.
And beyond those facts, folks, let's face it: this is a hell of an
interesting case I'm pursuing. It's too damned interesting to drop.
DABEAR
April 14th 06, 03:55 AM
Air Disaster.Com has been definitely utilized by a number of mainstream
and major press outlets, as it has advertised. It provides historic
information in Almanac form that is reference for Journalists who in
pursuit of a current accident, must refer back to related accidents and
facts surrounding the same or connecting the two.
I'm afraid that you are upset and expressing concern about the
disturbing pictures ~ and who would blame you ~ as opposed to the fact
that I as a Journalist, and others, research this site and others like
it when writing about aircraft accidents, disaster, prevention, design,
engineering, trends, etc. In our work, pictures don't always tell
everything, the written facts, first hand observations, second hand
observations, third hand observations, often tell more.
Indeed we Press DO use Air Disaster.Com and the site is excellent for
reference and leads. I view it as an all-encompassing hub for
information that I can go to immediately for facts, as opposed to
spending hours, if not days, pursuing searches and deep searches for
similar information. Any searching I do after Air Disaster.Com, is
usually streamlined and done quickly as a result. Errant leads
eliminated in pursuit of essential facts. A story presented as an end
result for timely reading by the public.
ChuckSlusarczyk
April 15th 06, 03:30 PM
In article . com>, DABEAR
says...
>
>I'll respond to both of the Riley posts and the one from Dan in this
>message:
>
>Much of what you guys have fought has not been in the upper levels of
>Federal Court dealing with Journalism, Civil Rights Violations,
>Racketeering, and most importantly, over 40 counts of Federal Perjury
>committed on or about October 17, 2005, in shutting down 56 of my
>websites. Until I inadvertantly came across this USENET group and the
>websites chronicling Campbell's past behavior, I had a difficult case
>before me. Now, this guy's a slam dunk. The more info I get about
>him, the easier it will be for the feds to take him down.
I hope your right and so do a lot of other people who have been zoomed.
>
>That Racketeering has already been charged against him, though the case
>ended with the tragic death of the courageous Attorney involved,
>supports my cases of Racketeering against him even though the case
>apparently never made it to decision. The man's Modus Operandi and his
>history are everything. This guy is like a wigged out boomerang that
>you throw and comes back to try and kill you. That's his history. He
>keeps repeating his crimes and his crimes get worse every five years or
>so.
True enough and he's beome clever enough not to get into any discourse in
public.
>
>There are crimes that he commits that you claim he cannot be punished
>for. On that, you're wrong.
Again, I hope your right but after 14 years of thinking he can't keep getting
away with it ...but he does.He lays low for a while, gets a new group of zoomies
following him and keeps doing what he's been doing.
> Terrorism, which is precisely what
>he conducted against my server in getting me shut down for ten days,
>filing a libelous DMCA complaint in which he accused me of everything
>you folks have accused him of. Literally, he's taken your charges and
>directed them against me and proclaimed himself a lamb.
He's been doing that for a long time and getting away with it. I hope sooner or
later he gets what he deserves.
>
>You folks have so much data that can take this clown down, considering
>his latest acts, that it isn't funny. Add them all together and the
>charges, not to mention the people making the charges, have strength in
>numbers in terms of Class Action (100 or more) and/or Group Action
>(Less Than 100) lawsuits.
>
>You've had the power all along to take him down, but you're one, two,
>three individuals going after him at a time, and the largest group
>apparently the RAH group, but in a defensive stance to the best of my
>knowledge.
Our best chance was with Tony P but now I'm not sure what it would take
to see justice done.
>
>This guy is a habitual criminal on top of everything else. Does not
>want to mend his ways and keeps getting worse. That's a new direction
>to focus on.
We were recently told that we don't have enough for a criminal prosecution and
maybe we have enough for a civil suit. Sounds like we'd have to throw good money
after bad.
>
>Yes, you're frustrated with the way the Justice System seems to let him
>slide. The larger the group, the greater the impact on the Courts as
>to this ONE individual's misconduct.
>
>As for those great guys that are "snookered" into working for him,
>O'Brien indicated here at USENET that he was ashamed of his publication
>and what Campbell did. Did O'Brien quit?
That's my problem with Kevin and the other writers I know who work for zoom they
tell me privately that the pay is good and it seems that's all that matters.
>
>His people know what he's doing and do nothing to stop him. To me,
>that means they're getting some hefty pay and perks causing them to be
>corrupted and do nothing or lose their own angle in the industry. That
>hurts people worse than what Jim does, in my opinion.
I agree
>
>The man needs stopped. Any information I can get to put towards that
>purpose is appreciated:
>
>Mark S. "Bear" Daniels
>5606 Calhoun Avenue # 5
>Van Nuys, CA 91401 USA
>
>It's that simple. If you haven't thrown your hands up in regards to
>ending this guy's misconduct, send your materials there or point to
>where I can find them online. I'm going into Court against him
>shortly, but he's small fish to fry. Just the same, he needs fried
>because then I can take his misconduct and direct it against his
>co-conspirators, who are equally responsible for him along with the
>government.
I don't know what you have or need but anything I have your welcome to.
>I'm not stopping until he's convicted and put away...for the remainder
>of his life, if necessary.
Snip
>And beyond those facts, folks, let's face it: this is a hell of an
>interesting case I'm pursuing. It's too damned interesting to drop.
>
Good luck and I hope zoom and yawn get all they deserve.
Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret
--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth
Dan
April 15th 06, 04:24 PM
ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
<snip>
>
> Good luck and I hope zoom and yawn get all they deserve.
>
> Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret
>
>
Like a slow dance or two with Bubba "your lips look pretty and I've
been locked up for 10 years" Cherrypopper in prison?
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
ChuckSlusarczyk
April 15th 06, 08:28 PM
In article <%e80g.2302$iF3.1665@dukeread01>, Dan says...
>
>ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
><snip>
>>
>> Good luck and I hope zoom and yawn get all they deserve.
>>
>> Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret
>>
>>
>
> Like a slow dance or two with Bubba "your lips look pretty and I've
>been locked up for 10 years" Cherrypopper in prison?
>
>Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
There's a song sung at the UL party about zoom and Bubba. I can't remember all
the words but I'll get them.
It's sung to the melody of "England swings"
The refrain is something like this:
zoom really sucks like the Talaban do.
he's the reason for his Sun n Fun Blues.
Saw zoom in the parking lot kissin peoples ass,
while beggin Dave Piper for a Sun n Fun Pass...
part of the Bubba verse goes
Listen to him hollar ,listen to him wale.
zoomy all locked up in the Sun n Fun jail.
here comes Bubba sneakin up behind ,
everybody knows what's on Bubbas mind.
I'll get all the words and post them so people can put them with the other zoom
songs that have been posted thru the years.
It's getting as popular as the song "Horse manure Falling from the sky" which is
about zoom.
Does any one have a link to the zoom song book?
See ya
Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret
--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth
DABEAR
April 16th 06, 08:44 AM
ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
> In article <%e80g.2302$iF3.1665@dukeread01>, Dan says...
>
> It's sung to the melody of "England swings"
>
> The refrain is something like this:
>
> zoom really sucks like the Talaban do.
> he's the reason for his Sun n Fun Blues.
> Saw zoom in the parking lot kissin peoples ass,
> while beggin Dave Piper for a Sun n Fun Pass...
How about publishing that Horse Manure song...I haven't heard any of
these. The England Swings satire is hilarious!
I might have to put a few together myself...
Frankly, I blame Dr. Dimento and Alfred E. Newman...
DABEAR
April 16th 06, 09:10 AM
Hi Chuck:
Will be in touch shortly. Busy today in Van Nuys with an Aviation
Seminar that went on here. Have to get the article and gallery(ies) up
online tomorrow. Almost finished with gallery one.
Anyway, in regards to the Criminal prosecution, I'll discuss that with
you privately. Zoom handed me his head on a platter and he's not only
running scared, but so too, are the Rocket Racing League. As he's on
their advisory board and has made it clear he did it to protect not
only himself, but them, they become liable as well. So too, are the
X-Prize foundation and now, the Reno Air Racing Association, since he
claims I demanded he attack their fearless leader, Mike Houghton. All
I requested was that he look at the cases of three individuals I was
reporting on, and a new case involving International Formula One racing
President Ray Sherwood.
Truly, Campbell is a liability to everyone in his ilk.
Campbell's indicating that he will be teaching at a symposium of the
AEA that takes place in Palm Springs between the 19th and the 22nd. I
have to be out of State at that time pursuing information related to
the entire case load I'm pursuing, and I wouldn't attend anyway. He has
nothing to offer as a Journalist, an Editor or a Publisher...his whole
operation is a lost cause because of the guy running it.
Beyond that, there is no mention whatsoever of him by the AEA in
regards to their Palm Springs event.
I'm going to be pursuing with high priority the report I received here
that Campbell was quoted by Time in regards to the Aeromexico
collision. I was wondering if you have any leads on that as well? In
particular, what I am looking for is any published or spoken
acknowledgement by Campbell that Time had quoted him in regards to that
piece.
Also, I would like to speak with you in regards to some files and
information that you possess.
Campbell's habitual nature in regards to his misconduct is what will
seal his fate. He can't control himself, that is clear. So clear,
that I can pretty much publish the legal recourse that can be taken
against him right here, and he still couldn't control himself long
enough to avoid prosecution after having been fed a "way out."
However, like I said, I'll be in touch shortly, because all this
information you folks have amassed is key to a conviction, when
combined with the October 17th, 2005, incident he pulled on me.
My intent is simple: see Campbell incarcerated and his publication
shut down for good cause. As long as his writers are going to say
nothing, they aide and abet his misconduct and are liable. They can go
down with him and his rag.
The sad thing is that Campbell isn't the only one pulling this kind of
nonsense. There are others, so you basically have to weed them out (as
a Journalist) one by one. But it's the old proverb about giving
someone enough rope and they'll hang themselves.
So, see you soon...love the song satire of Zoom...if you locate that
songbook, let me know...I'd love to republish at my sites.
By the way, who is yawn? I thought for a moment that yawn was zoom as
well...
Dang! He's everywhere! He's everywhere! <G>
And still, he's no where...
You guys are aces! Those websites and the information they contain are
just what the doctor ordered. Oh, in regards to criminal prosecution,
I'll explain some other ways when I touch bases with you...
Dan
April 16th 06, 05:39 PM
DABEAR wrote:
<snip>
>
> By the way, who is yawn? I thought for a moment that yawn was zoom as
> well...
>
Yawn = Juan Jimenez whose only purpose in life is zoom's attack puppy
along the lines of James Carvile only with even less class. Yawn is fond
of innuendo and not backing up his claims. A Google search will reveal a
lot. I am surprised he hasn't opened his yap in this thread yet.
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Anthony W
April 16th 06, 05:52 PM
DABEAR wrote:
>
> Frankly, I blame Dr. Dimento and Alfred E. Newman...
You forgot Weird Al. He has surpassed all that came before him in the
area of satire and parody. With an honorable mention to Paul Shanklin.
Perhaps some one can do a zoom song to MacArthur Park. Zoom is fumbling
in the dark and all that BS is raining down... I'm sure some one with
more creativity than me could do something with this.
Tony
Ron Wanttaja
April 16th 06, 06:39 PM
On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 16:52:34 GMT, Anthony W > wrote:
>Perhaps some one can do a zoom song to MacArthur Park.
"Someone left my logbook in the rain
with my old handwriting flowing down....
Someone left my logbook, in the rain
and I don't think I can re-make it,
'cause it took too long to fake it,
and they won't believe it, if I try again,
Oh, Noooooooooo......."
Ron Wanttaja
Anthony W
April 16th 06, 07:27 PM
Ron Wanttaja wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 16:52:34 GMT, Anthony W > wrote:
>
>> Perhaps some one can do a zoom song to MacArthur Park.
>
> "Someone left my logbook in the rain
> with my old handwriting flowing down....
> Someone left my logbook, in the rain
> and I don't think I can re-make it,
> 'cause it took too long to fake it,
> and they won't believe it, if I try again,
> Oh, Noooooooooo......."
>
> Ron Wanttaja
I think you gave a classic in the making. ;o)
Tony
Richard Riley
April 16th 06, 10:25 PM
With Ann Coulter, she know's it's a schtick, the audience (almost all
of the audience, anyway) knows it's a schtick. She's Don Rickles with
a political bent. WIth Carville, it's a schtick, though most of his
audience doesn't know that. I mean, if he *really* thought that
republicans should be herded into concentration camps he probably
wouldn't be married to one.
Juan is more like Randie Rhodes, playing second bannana to Al Franken.
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.