WRE
April 4th 06, 04:59 AM
"A mainstay of the attack pieces against Charlie Sheen have been that he
is not credible enough to speak on the topic of 9/11. These charges are
ridiculed by the fact that Sheen is an expert on 9/11 who spends hours a
day meticulously researching the topic"
Sheen is an expert? Meticulously researching the topic? Lets look at what he
said during the interview and these are just a few points that show he is
far from an expert!
1. Sheen stated "Those planes that crashed into the buildings didn't look
like any planes I'd ever seen" (implying they were fueled military planes)
Say what Charlie...they clearly looked like US Commercial Airliners and had
all the markings
2. He stated that because there are no frames of the plane crashing into
the Pentagon that it was a missile and because there was nothing left of the
plane also proves it.
Say what Charlie? How about the witnesses on the ground outside the Pentagon
that saw the plane slam into the building? When most planes crash its at a
slow speed. How many examples do you have of planes slamming into buildings
at 400+ kts.?
3. He states how could a plane make a 270 degree turn at 500 mph and decend
that fast?
Hey charlie.......its not speed and its not the degree of the turn...its the
turning radius if your implying some G force thing here Do you think a plane
is not capable of turning 270 degrees at cruise speed? If so you certainly
are no expert.....and decend that fast? push the nose of a commercial
jetliner forward and you are going to come down very fast! Pull the thottles
to idle...bring out some spoilers...push the nose down and your coming dow
like a bat out of hell. Hey Charlie....you can bend the wings of a 747 up 45
degrees before they snap....
4. He states that when the first jetliner hit the building all the "jet
fuel" clearly burns up based on the fire and explosion.
Again, say what Charlie...how do you know that? what do you base that on?
how much fuel was in the aircraft? how do you know it all burned up?
5. He states that jet fuel doesnt burn hot enough to melt steel...so how
could have it weakened the building? Gee Charlie, ya think anything in the
building started to burn? What temp does synthetic carpet burn at? Curtains?
Walls? Doors? And who knows what else. Ever think that the jet fuel just
started the fire. And you say that other biuldings have burned an not
collapsed so why did these 3? Have any examples of fully fueled 757's
flying into buildings at high rates of speed?
These are just five examplea of pure speculation on Charlie Sheens part. As
with the Kennedy Assasination, if the explanations cannot fit in the box
100%, then it is a conspiricy and there is something else far more devilish
going on. Give me a break....
"TR-U-TH" > wrote in message
...
> http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/040406mainsuspect.htm
>
> MP3 of interview at above site
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Former Head Of Star Wars Program Says Cheney Main 9/11 Suspect
> Official version of events a conspiracy theory, says drills were cover
> for attacks
>
> Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com | April 4 2006
>
> The former head of the Star Wars missile defense program under Presidents
> Ford and Carter has gone public to say that the official version of 9/11
> is a conspiracy theory and his main suspect for the architect of the
> attack is Vice President Dick Cheney.
>
> Dr. Robert M. Bowman, Lt. Col., USAF, ret. flew 101 combat missions in
> Vietnam. He is the recipient of the Eisenhower Medal, the George F.
> Kennan Peace Prize, the President's Medal of Veterans for Peace, the
> Society of Military Engineers Gold Medal (twice), six Air Medals, and
> dozens of other awards and honors. His Ph.D. is in Aeronautics and
> Nuclear Engineering from Caltech. He chaired 8 major international
> conferences, and is one of the country's foremost experts on National
> Security.
>
> Bowman worked secretly for the US government on the Star Wars project and
> was the first to coin the very term in a 1977 secret memo. After Bowman
> realized that the program was only ever intended to be used as an
> aggressive and not defensive tool, as part of a plan to initiate a
> nuclear war with the Soviets, he left the program and campaigned against
> it.
>
> In an interview with The Alex Jones Show aired nationally on the GCN
> Radio Network, Bowman (pictured below) stated that at the bare minimum if
> Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaeda were involved in 9/11 then the government
> stood down and allowed the attacks to happen. He said it is plausible
> that the entire chain of military command were unaware of what was taking
> place and were used as tools by the people pulling the strings behind the
> attack.
>
> Bowman outlined how the drills on the morning of 9/11 that simulated
> planes crashing into buildings on the east coast were used as a cover to
> dupe unwitting air defense personnel into not responding quickly enough
> to stop the attack.
>
> "The exercises that went on that morning simulating the exact kind of
> thing that was happening so confused the people in the FAA and
> NORAD....that they didn't they didn't know what was real and what was
> part of the exercise," said Bowman
>
> "I think the people who planned and carried out those exercises, they're
> the ones that should be the object of investigation."
>
> Asked if he could name a prime suspect who was the likely architect
> behind the attacks, Bowman stated, "If I had to narrow it down to one
> person....I think my prime suspect would be Dick Cheney."
>
> Bowman said that privately his military fighter pilot peers and
> colleagues did not disagree with his sentiments about the real story
> behind 9/11.
>
> Bowman agreed that the US was in danger of slipping into a dictatorship
> and stated, "I think there's been nothing closer to fascism than what
> we've seen lately from this government."
>
> Bowman slammed the Patriot Act as having, "Done more to destroy the
> rights of Americans than all of our enemies combined."
>
> Bowman trashed the 9/11 Commission as a politically motivated cover-up
> with abounding conflicts of interest, charging, "The 9/11 Commission
> omitted anything that might be the least bit suspicious or embarrassing
> or in any way detract from the official conspiracy so it was a total
> whitewash."
>
> "There needs to be a true investigation, not the kind of sham
> investigations we have had with the 9/11 omission and all the rest of
> that junk," said Bowman.
>
> Asked if the perpetrators of 9/11 were preparing to stage another false-
> flag attack to reinvigorate their agenda Bowman agreed that, "I can see
> that and I hope they can't pull it off, I hope they are prevented from
> pulling it off but I know darn good and well they'd like to have another
> one."
>
> A mainstay of the attack pieces against Charlie Sheen have been that he
> is not credible enough to speak on the topic of 9/11. These charges are
> ridiculed by the fact that Sheen is an expert on 9/11 who spends hours a
> day meticulously researching the topic, something that the attack dogs
> have failed to do, aiming their comments solely at Sheen's personal life
> and ignoring his invitation to challenge him on the facts.
>
> In addition, from the very start we have put forth eminently credible
> individuals only for them to be ignored by the establishment media.
> Physics Professors, former White House advisors and CIA analysts, the
> father of Reaganomics, German Defense Ministers and Bush's former
> Secretary of the Treasury, have all gone public on 9/11 but have been
> uniformly ignored by the majority of the establishment press.
>
> Will Robert Bowman also be blackballed as the mainstream continue to
> misrepresent the 9/11 truth movement as an occupation of the fringe
> minority?
>
> Bowman is currently running for Congress in Florida's 15th District.
>
> ---------------------------------
>
> Click here to listen to the entire interview for free. Please consider
> supporting our massive bandwidth costs by subscribing to Prison
> Planet.tv.
is not credible enough to speak on the topic of 9/11. These charges are
ridiculed by the fact that Sheen is an expert on 9/11 who spends hours a
day meticulously researching the topic"
Sheen is an expert? Meticulously researching the topic? Lets look at what he
said during the interview and these are just a few points that show he is
far from an expert!
1. Sheen stated "Those planes that crashed into the buildings didn't look
like any planes I'd ever seen" (implying they were fueled military planes)
Say what Charlie...they clearly looked like US Commercial Airliners and had
all the markings
2. He stated that because there are no frames of the plane crashing into
the Pentagon that it was a missile and because there was nothing left of the
plane also proves it.
Say what Charlie? How about the witnesses on the ground outside the Pentagon
that saw the plane slam into the building? When most planes crash its at a
slow speed. How many examples do you have of planes slamming into buildings
at 400+ kts.?
3. He states how could a plane make a 270 degree turn at 500 mph and decend
that fast?
Hey charlie.......its not speed and its not the degree of the turn...its the
turning radius if your implying some G force thing here Do you think a plane
is not capable of turning 270 degrees at cruise speed? If so you certainly
are no expert.....and decend that fast? push the nose of a commercial
jetliner forward and you are going to come down very fast! Pull the thottles
to idle...bring out some spoilers...push the nose down and your coming dow
like a bat out of hell. Hey Charlie....you can bend the wings of a 747 up 45
degrees before they snap....
4. He states that when the first jetliner hit the building all the "jet
fuel" clearly burns up based on the fire and explosion.
Again, say what Charlie...how do you know that? what do you base that on?
how much fuel was in the aircraft? how do you know it all burned up?
5. He states that jet fuel doesnt burn hot enough to melt steel...so how
could have it weakened the building? Gee Charlie, ya think anything in the
building started to burn? What temp does synthetic carpet burn at? Curtains?
Walls? Doors? And who knows what else. Ever think that the jet fuel just
started the fire. And you say that other biuldings have burned an not
collapsed so why did these 3? Have any examples of fully fueled 757's
flying into buildings at high rates of speed?
These are just five examplea of pure speculation on Charlie Sheens part. As
with the Kennedy Assasination, if the explanations cannot fit in the box
100%, then it is a conspiricy and there is something else far more devilish
going on. Give me a break....
"TR-U-TH" > wrote in message
...
> http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/040406mainsuspect.htm
>
> MP3 of interview at above site
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Former Head Of Star Wars Program Says Cheney Main 9/11 Suspect
> Official version of events a conspiracy theory, says drills were cover
> for attacks
>
> Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com | April 4 2006
>
> The former head of the Star Wars missile defense program under Presidents
> Ford and Carter has gone public to say that the official version of 9/11
> is a conspiracy theory and his main suspect for the architect of the
> attack is Vice President Dick Cheney.
>
> Dr. Robert M. Bowman, Lt. Col., USAF, ret. flew 101 combat missions in
> Vietnam. He is the recipient of the Eisenhower Medal, the George F.
> Kennan Peace Prize, the President's Medal of Veterans for Peace, the
> Society of Military Engineers Gold Medal (twice), six Air Medals, and
> dozens of other awards and honors. His Ph.D. is in Aeronautics and
> Nuclear Engineering from Caltech. He chaired 8 major international
> conferences, and is one of the country's foremost experts on National
> Security.
>
> Bowman worked secretly for the US government on the Star Wars project and
> was the first to coin the very term in a 1977 secret memo. After Bowman
> realized that the program was only ever intended to be used as an
> aggressive and not defensive tool, as part of a plan to initiate a
> nuclear war with the Soviets, he left the program and campaigned against
> it.
>
> In an interview with The Alex Jones Show aired nationally on the GCN
> Radio Network, Bowman (pictured below) stated that at the bare minimum if
> Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaeda were involved in 9/11 then the government
> stood down and allowed the attacks to happen. He said it is plausible
> that the entire chain of military command were unaware of what was taking
> place and were used as tools by the people pulling the strings behind the
> attack.
>
> Bowman outlined how the drills on the morning of 9/11 that simulated
> planes crashing into buildings on the east coast were used as a cover to
> dupe unwitting air defense personnel into not responding quickly enough
> to stop the attack.
>
> "The exercises that went on that morning simulating the exact kind of
> thing that was happening so confused the people in the FAA and
> NORAD....that they didn't they didn't know what was real and what was
> part of the exercise," said Bowman
>
> "I think the people who planned and carried out those exercises, they're
> the ones that should be the object of investigation."
>
> Asked if he could name a prime suspect who was the likely architect
> behind the attacks, Bowman stated, "If I had to narrow it down to one
> person....I think my prime suspect would be Dick Cheney."
>
> Bowman said that privately his military fighter pilot peers and
> colleagues did not disagree with his sentiments about the real story
> behind 9/11.
>
> Bowman agreed that the US was in danger of slipping into a dictatorship
> and stated, "I think there's been nothing closer to fascism than what
> we've seen lately from this government."
>
> Bowman slammed the Patriot Act as having, "Done more to destroy the
> rights of Americans than all of our enemies combined."
>
> Bowman trashed the 9/11 Commission as a politically motivated cover-up
> with abounding conflicts of interest, charging, "The 9/11 Commission
> omitted anything that might be the least bit suspicious or embarrassing
> or in any way detract from the official conspiracy so it was a total
> whitewash."
>
> "There needs to be a true investigation, not the kind of sham
> investigations we have had with the 9/11 omission and all the rest of
> that junk," said Bowman.
>
> Asked if the perpetrators of 9/11 were preparing to stage another false-
> flag attack to reinvigorate their agenda Bowman agreed that, "I can see
> that and I hope they can't pull it off, I hope they are prevented from
> pulling it off but I know darn good and well they'd like to have another
> one."
>
> A mainstay of the attack pieces against Charlie Sheen have been that he
> is not credible enough to speak on the topic of 9/11. These charges are
> ridiculed by the fact that Sheen is an expert on 9/11 who spends hours a
> day meticulously researching the topic, something that the attack dogs
> have failed to do, aiming their comments solely at Sheen's personal life
> and ignoring his invitation to challenge him on the facts.
>
> In addition, from the very start we have put forth eminently credible
> individuals only for them to be ignored by the establishment media.
> Physics Professors, former White House advisors and CIA analysts, the
> father of Reaganomics, German Defense Ministers and Bush's former
> Secretary of the Treasury, have all gone public on 9/11 but have been
> uniformly ignored by the majority of the establishment press.
>
> Will Robert Bowman also be blackballed as the mainstream continue to
> misrepresent the 9/11 truth movement as an occupation of the fringe
> minority?
>
> Bowman is currently running for Congress in Florida's 15th District.
>
> ---------------------------------
>
> Click here to listen to the entire interview for free. Please consider
> supporting our massive bandwidth costs by subscribing to Prison
> Planet.tv.