TSA Officer arrested for kidnapping, identity theft

[cjcampbell]

http://makeashorterlink.com/?J2E8425FC

Seems a Sun Valley TSA officer tried to kidnap a ten year old kid and
take him to his house. When detectives investigated, they found that
the guy had so many IDs they don't really know who he is.

So, we are supposed to feel so much more secure now that we have guys
like this confiscating our fingernail clippers. Homeland Security wants
us to do background checks on all our students, but apparently has not
stopped to consider whether even more extensive background checks on
their own employees are effective at all.

[Judah]

"cjcampbell" > wrote in
ups.com:

> http://makeashorterlink.com/?J2E8425FC
>
> Seems a Sun Valley TSA officer tried to kidnap a ten year old kid and
> take him to his house. When detectives investigated, they found that
> the guy had so many IDs they don't really know who he is.
>
> So, we are supposed to feel so much more secure now that we have guys
> like this confiscating our fingernail clippers. Homeland Security wants
> us to do background checks on all our students, but apparently has not
> stopped to consider whether even more extensive background checks on
> their own employees are effective at all.

Yeabut at least they're not subcontractors anymore...

[Robert M. Gary]

That's true. Once a agency makes one mistake, clearly they are 100%
incapable.

[Matt Barrow]

"Robert M. Gary" > wrote in message
ups.com...
> That's true. Once a agency makes one mistake, clearly they are 100%
> incapable.
>
Once?

[Robert M. Gary]

>> That's true. Once a agency makes one mistake, clearly they are 100%
>> incapable.

>Once?

That was exactly the implication of the OP.

-Robert

[cjcampbell]

Robert M. Gary wrote:
> That's true. Once a agency makes one mistake, clearly they are 100%
> incapable.

No, but this is the latest in a long string of mistakes, incompetence,
criminal activity and corruption.

[Matt Barrow]

"Robert M. Gary" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>>> That's true. Once a agency makes one mistake, clearly they are 100%
>>> incapable.
>
>>Once?
>
> That was exactly the implication of the OP.
>
Though he didn't state it specifically, I read it as "Excedrin (Vicodin)
headache #428"

[Private]

"cjcampbell" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Robert M. Gary wrote:
>> That's true. Once a agency makes one mistake, clearly they are 100%
>> incapable.
>
> No, but this is the latest in a long string of mistakes, incompetence,
> criminal activity and corruption.

and another example of the implementation of the "Police State".

Sometimes watching from a distance allows greater perspective. I grieve for
my friends who have lost that which they valued most.

just my .02

[Grumman-581]

"Private" > wrote in message
news:AMY%f.19158$7a.1406@pd7tw1no...
> and another example of the implementation of the "Police State".
>
> Sometimes watching from a distance allows greater perspective. I grieve
for
> my friends who have lost that which they valued most.

Yeah, like we really give a **** what some anonymous Canadian Caribou ****er
might have to say...

[john smith]

In article >,
"Grumman-581" > wrote:

> "Private" > wrote in message
> news:AMY%f.19158$7a.1406@pd7tw1no...
> > and another example of the implementation of the "Police State".
> >
> > Sometimes watching from a distance allows greater perspective. I grieve
> for
> > my friends who have lost that which they valued most.
>
> Yeah, like we really give a **** what some anonymous Canadian Caribou ****er
> might have to say...

I don't know where that comment came from, but it is out of line.

[Morgans]

"john smith" > wrote

> I don't know where that comment came from, but it is out of line.

Grumman-581 seems to feel the need to resort to vulgar language, and
disrespectful comments in relation to race and religion. That is enough to
put him in my round file.

As a construction worker, I can turn the air blue with the best of them.
The difference is, I know the proper time and place for it. (most of the
time)
--
Jim in NC

[Grumman-581]

"john smith" > wrote in message
...
> I don't know where that comment came from, but it is out of line.

It came from Texas... Do try to keep up, will ya'...

[Grumman-581]

"Morgans" > wrote in message
...
> Grumman-581 seems to feel the need to resort to vulgar language, and
> disrespectful comments in relation to race and religion. That is enough
to
> put him in my round file.

Awh, gee, I'm not politically correct... I'm ****in' heartbroken...

> As a construction worker, I can turn the air blue with the best of them.
> The difference is, I know the proper time and place for it. (most of the
> time)

I'm ex-Navy... Anytime is the proper time...

[Grumman-581]

"john smith" > wrote in message
...
> I don't know where that comment came from, but it is out of line.

So says someone using a moniker of "John Smith" with an invalid email
address... Perhaps you're just one anonymous **** standing up for another
anonymous ****? Let's just say that I don't put much value in what someone
might post who doesn't use their real name or at least a moniker that maps
into a real name... Before you start comments about my moniker, I used to
use my real name until I found out that there were others with that name on
the net... Figured that by using my aircraft identifier, I was ensured that
no one else was using it and it still mapped into my real name via a quick
lookup on the FAA database... So there! Real name and real address...

[Skywise]

"Grumman-581" > wrote in news:Rm_%
:

> "Morgans" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Grumman-581 seems to feel the need to resort to vulgar language, and
>> disrespectful comments in relation to race and religion. That is enough
> to
>> put him in my round file.
>
> Awh, gee, I'm not politically correct... I'm ****in' heartbroken...
>
>> As a construction worker, I can turn the air blue with the best of them.
>> The difference is, I know the proper time and place for it. (most of the
>> time)
>
> I'm ex-Navy... Anytime is the proper time...

And somehow that make you more worthy of using up the valuable
resources on this planet?

You know, it's people like you who make me wonder if I might not
feel so bad if someone were to finally push the shiny red button.

Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?

[Montblack]

("Grumman-581" wrote)
[student newsgroup snipped]
> So says someone using a moniker of "John Smith" with an invalid email
> address... Perhaps you're just one anonymous #%^* standing up for another
> anonymous #%^*? Let's just say that I don't put much value in what
> someone might post who doesn't use their real name or at least a moniker
> that maps into a real name... Before you start comments about my moniker,
> I used to use my real name until I found out that there were others with
> that name on the net... Figured that by using my aircraft identifier, I
> was ensured that no one else was using it and it still mapped into my real
> name via a quick lookup on the FAA database... So there! Real name and
> real address...


Hey, I know John Smith.

He's the #%^&*#^&**#$%^&*-#$%*&^# who kept the Little French Girl ("Oui"
"Oui") away from me all evening at the OSH N40BBQ last year. :-(

That's not a 'happy face' John!


Montblack
Minnesota

[Bob Noel]

In article >,
Skywise > wrote:

> You know, it's people like you who make me wonder if I might not
> feel so bad if someone were to finally push the shiny red button.

The "easy" button?

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

[Grumman-581]

"Skywise" > wrote in message
...
> And somehow that make you more worthy of using up the valuable
> resources on this planet?

Are you saying that frank language is a vital resource of the planet and in
danger of being used up? Damn, I would have hazarded to have guessed that
there was a neverending supply of such language...

[Grumman-581]

"Bob Noel" > wrote in message
...
> Bob Noel
> Looking for a sig the
> lawyers will hatef

How about this one?
http://www.geocities.com/grumman581/lawyer-problem-solution.htm

[sobey]

"Grumman-581" wrote:
>
>How about this one?
>http://www.geocities.com/grumman581/lawyer-problem-solution.htm
>

Either that or something clever, funny, or interesting.


SOK

[john smith]

> Hey, I know John Smith.
>
> He's the #%^&*#^&**#$%^&*-#$%*&^# who kept the Little French Girl ("Oui"
> "Oui") away from me all evening at the OSH N40BBQ last year. :-(
> That's not a 'happy face' John!

Now you're making things up that just are not true!
She wondered and socialized with whomever she wished.
She just doesn't know the same way the rest of us do.
Perhaps if you had offered her a propper French wine, she would have
spent some time with you. ;-))

[john smith]

> > Hey, I know John Smith.
> >
> > He's the #%^&*#^&**#$%^&*-#$%*&^# who kept the Little French Girl ("Oui"
> > "Oui") away from me all evening at the OSH N40BBQ last year. :-(
> > That's not a 'happy face' John!
>
> Now you're making things up that just are not true!
> She wondered and socialized with whomever she wished.
> She just doesn't know you the same way the rest of us do.
> Perhaps if you had offered her a propper French wine, she would have
> spent some time with you. ;-))

inserted "you" into line three