Will the FAA be the next victim of the Government AX?

[NOIRS]

We are one Mid-Air away folks


WASHINGTON - Hurricane Katrina turned FEMA into a "symbol of
a bumbling bureaucracy" so far beyond repair that it should
be scrapped, senators said Thursday. They called for
creation of a new disaster relief agency as the next storm
season looms on the horizon

"Bumbling bureaucracy"

That sounds so familiar just like the other Government
agency we know so well

[Steven P. McNicoll]

"NOIRS" > wrote in message
. ..
>
> We are one Mid-Air away folks
>
>
> WASHINGTON - Hurricane Katrina turned FEMA into a "symbol of a bumbling
> bureaucracy" so far beyond repair that it should be scrapped, senators
> said Thursday. They called for creation of a new disaster relief agency as
> the next storm season looms on the horizon
>
> "Bumbling bureaucracy"
>
> That sounds so familiar just like the other Government agency we know so
> well
>

If we have that mid-air, how many would the total then be?

[AJ]

Just look what the current administration did to NASA's Science
Exploration Division.

AJ

[Aluckyguess]

Why dont they just use the military. We dont need fema. A waste of money.
Give it to the army.
"Steven P. McNicoll" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "NOIRS" > wrote in message
> . ..
>>
>> We are one Mid-Air away folks
>>
>>
>> WASHINGTON - Hurricane Katrina turned FEMA into a "symbol of a bumbling
>> bureaucracy" so far beyond repair that it should be scrapped, senators
>> said Thursday. They called for creation of a new disaster relief agency
>> as the next storm season looms on the horizon
>>
>> "Bumbling bureaucracy"
>>
>> That sounds so familiar just like the other Government agency we know so
>> well
>>
>
> If we have that mid-air, how many would the total then be?
>

[Steven P. McNicoll]

Aluckyguess wrote:
>
>Why dont they just use the military. We dont need fema. A waste of money.
> Give it to the army.
>

Give FEMA to the Army? What would the Army do with FEMA?

[Sam Spade]

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
> Aluckyguess wrote:
>
>>Why dont they just use the military. We dont need fema. A waste of money.
>>Give it to the army.
>>
>
>
> Give FEMA to the Army? What would the Army do with FEMA?
>

After we reinstate the draft, the Army will hopefully build up fast
enough to control the civil riots that will become commonplace as the
economy folds. If there is any margin remaining, then the troops can do
natural disaster control and recovery as well.

[Jose]

> After we reinstate the draft, the Army will hopefully build up fast enough to control the civil riots that will become commonplace as the economy folds. If there is any margin remaining, then the troops can do natural disaster control and recovery as well.

When they're done, they can take on the drug lords, pornographers,
deadbeat dads, and jaywalkers.

Jose
--
The price of freedom is... well... freedom.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

[Grumman-581]

"Steven P. McNicoll" > wrote in message
oups.com...
> Give FEMA to the Army? What would the Army do with FEMA?

Don't ask, don't tell... <evil-grin>

[Dudley Henriques]

"Steven P. McNicoll" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Aluckyguess wrote:
>>
>>Why dont they just use the military. We dont need fema. A waste of money.
>> Give it to the army.
>>
>
> Give FEMA to the Army? What would the Army do with FEMA?

Target Practice?

Dudley

[GeorgeC]

Target practice? <evil-grin>

On 27 Apr 2006 18:08:45 -0700, "Steven P. McNicoll" >
wrote:

>
>Aluckyguess wrote:
>>
>>Why dont they just use the military. We dont need fema. A waste of money.
>> Give it to the army.
>>
>
>Give FEMA to the Army? What would the Army do with FEMA?

GeorgeC

[Newps]

Sam Spade wrote:

>>
>
> After we reinstate the draft, the Army will hopefully build up fast
> enough to control the civil riots that will become commonplace as the
> economy folds.

When the economy folds? The economy is booming.

[Sam Spade]

Newps wrote:
>
>
> Sam Spade wrote:
>
>>>
>>
>> After we reinstate the draft, the Army will hopefully build up fast
>> enough to control the civil riots that will become commonplace as the
>> economy folds.
>
>
> When the economy folds? The economy is booming.

Not hardly. Only the stock market is booming, but stay tuned.

[Steven P. McNicoll]

"Sam Spade" > wrote in message
news:Hxt4g.174441$bm6.30468@fed1read04...
>
> Not hardly. Only the stock market is booming, but stay tuned.
>

The economy IS booming. You need to find a better news source.

[Steven P. McNicoll]

"Sam Spade" > wrote in message
news:mce4g.174398$bm6.38326@fed1read04...
>
> After we reinstate the draft, the Army will hopefully build up fast enough
> to control the civil riots that will become commonplace as the economy
> folds. If there is any margin remaining, then the troops can do natural
> disaster control and recovery as well.
>

It appears you're a complete wacko.

[Matt Barrow]

"Sam Spade" > wrote in message
news:Hxt4g.174441$bm6.30468@fed1read04...
> Newps wrote:
>>
>>
>> Sam Spade wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> After we reinstate the draft, the Army will hopefully build up fast
>>> enough to control the civil riots that will become commonplace as the
>>> economy folds.
>>
>>
>> When the economy folds? The economy is booming.
>
> Not hardly. Only the stock market is booming, but stay tuned.

The stock market is booming because investment is booming because GNP is
booming...

[Jose]

> The stock market is booming because investment is booming because GNP is
> booming...

Guaranteed Navigational Performance is boosting the economy? Gee, GA
has more clout than I thought. :)

Jose
--
The price of freedom is... well... freedom.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

[Larry Dighera]

On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 07:57:28 -0700, "Matt Barrow"
> wrote in
>::

>The stock market is booming because investment is booming because GNP is
>booming...

Because the President is spending your grandchildren's' income taxes
on wars...

[Sam Spade]

Matt Barrow wrote:
> "Sam Spade" > wrote in message
> news:Hxt4g.174441$bm6.30468@fed1read04...
>
>>Newps wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Sam Spade wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>After we reinstate the draft, the Army will hopefully build up fast
>>>>enough to control the civil riots that will become commonplace as the
>>>>economy folds.
>>>
>>>
>>>When the economy folds? The economy is booming.
>>
>>Not hardly. Only the stock market is booming, but stay tuned.
>
>
> The stock market is booming because investment is booming because GNP is
> booming...
>
>
Have you checked the weakness of the dollar recently? What about the
soaring trade deficit, not to mention the national dept load.

Then, there are a few airlines going broke, overvalued housing with
negative equity mortgages, and rapidly rising energy prices.

[Sam Spade]

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

> "Sam Spade" > wrote in message
> news:mce4g.174398$bm6.38326@fed1read04...
>
>>After we reinstate the draft, the Army will hopefully build up fast enough
>>to control the civil riots that will become commonplace as the economy
>>folds. If there is any margin remaining, then the troops can do natural
>>disaster control and recovery as well.
>>
>
>
> It appears you're a complete wacko.
>
>
>
That means we have a common bond!

[Matt Barrow]

"Sam Spade" > wrote in message
news:0CM4g.174561$bm6.16933@fed1read04...
> Matt Barrow wrote:
>> "Sam Spade" > wrote in message
>> news:Hxt4g.174441$bm6.30468@fed1read04...
>>
>>>Newps wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Sam Spade wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>After we reinstate the draft, the Army will hopefully build up fast
>>>>>enough to control the civil riots that will become commonplace as the
>>>>>economy folds.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>When the economy folds? The economy is booming.
>>>
>>>Not hardly. Only the stock market is booming, but stay tuned.
>>
>>
>> The stock market is booming because investment is booming because GNP is
>> booming...
> Have you checked the weakness of the dollar recently?

Yes.

We've been hearing about that since the 60's.

> What about the soaring trade deficit,

http://capmag.com/article.asp?id=4240
http://capmag.com/article.asp?id=3306

> not to mention the national dept load.

Yes. Other nations are in similar straits (% wise) with much weaker
economies. Warren Buffet just took a mega-$billion hit from shorting the
dollar.

> Then, there are a few airlines going broke, overvalued housing with
> negative equity mortgages, and rapidly rising energy prices.

And for all that, the US is much more able to cope with changing conditions
than just about any nation on Earth and much more so than any large nation.

[Martin Hotze]

On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:41:31 -0700, Matt Barrow wrote:

>And for all that, the US is much more able to cope with changing conditions
>than just about any nation on Earth and much more so than any large nation.

True. But this is only possible due to the effect that the earth is flat.

:-)

#m
--
"We're out of toilet paper sir!"
<http://www.webcrunchers.com/crunch/Play/history/stories/toilet.html>

[karl gruber]

"Larry Dighera" > wrote in message
...
>
> Because the President is spending your grandchildren's' income taxes
> on wars...


There won't be any "grandchildren" unless we kill the vermin every chance we
get.

[Steven P. McNicoll]

"Sam Spade" > wrote in message
news:HCM4g.174563$bm6.62413@fed1read04...
>>
>> It appears you're a complete wacko.
>>
>
> That means we have a common bond!
>

Thank you for verifying my observation.

[Steven P. McNicoll]

"Larry Dighera" > wrote in message
...
>>
>>The stock market is booming because investment is booming because GNP is
>>booming...
>>
>
> Because the President is spending your grandchildren's' income taxes
> on wars...
>

....which will make it more likely he will have grandchildren.

[Larry Dighera]

On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 19:08:06 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
> wrote in
. net>::

>
>"Larry Dighera" > wrote in message
...
>>>
>>>The stock market is booming because investment is booming because GNP is
>>>booming...
>>>
>>
>> Because the President is spending your grandchildren's' income taxes
>> on wars...
>>
>
>...which will make it more likely he will have grandchildren.
>

The war in Iraq does nothing to increase the likelihood of a US
citizen's grandchild's survival; that's just the thinly veiled party
lie. We'd have to wage war against a lot more than Iraq for there to
be any measurable effect.

Now if the trillions of dollars baby Bush is spending on his war in
Iraq were spent on constructive things like reducing environmental
pollution, education, scientific research and development ..., instead
of a destructive personal vendetta, it might have some positive
effect.

[Larry Dighera]

On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:53:13 -0700, "karl gruber"
> wrote in >::

>
>There won't be any "grandchildren" unless we kill the vermin every chance we
>get.

So you're advocating the US commit genocide in the name of peace? :-)

[Steven P. McNicoll]

"Larry Dighera" > wrote in message
...
>
> The war in Iraq does nothing to increase the likelihood of a US
> citizen's grandchild's survival; that's just the thinly veiled party
> lie. We'd have to wage war against a lot more than Iraq for there to
> be any measurable effect.
>

We are.


>
> Now if the trillions of dollars baby Bush is spending on his war in
> Iraq were spent on constructive things like reducing environmental
> pollution, education, scientific research and development ..., instead
> of a destructive personal vendetta, it might have some positive
> effect.
>

You bought the lie.

[Steven P. McNicoll]

"Larry Dighera" > wrote in message
...
>
> So you're advocating the US commit genocide in the name of peace? :-)
>

No, he's not.

[karl gruber]

"Larry Dighera" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:53:13 -0700, "karl gruber"
> > wrote in >::
>
>>
>>There won't be any "grandchildren" unless we kill the vermin every chance
>>we
>>get.
>
> So you're advocating the US commit genocide in the name of peace? :-)

I advocate killing those whose only desire in life is to kill us. I also
avocate that the liberals stop the genocide on unborn babies.

Strange how hypocritical the left is.

[Peter Duniho]

"karl gruber" > wrote in message
...
> Strange how hypocritical the left is.

As opposed to the right, who are anti-death (abortion) except when they
aren't (death-penalty).

Face it: no matter which side of the fence you're on, you can easily
over-simplify the other side's views and paint them as hypocritical. And
both sides do, over and over.

Too bad they (you) waste so much time demonizing people they (you) consider
their (your) opponents, rather than working together to accomplish good
things.

Pete

[Jay Honeck]

> As opposed to the right, who are anti-death (abortion) except when they
> aren't (death-penalty).

Who *ever* said the Right was "anti-death"?
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

[Larry Dighera]

On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 22:11:30 -0700, "Peter Duniho"
> wrote in
>::

>Too bad they (you) waste so much time demonizing people they (you) consider
>their (your) opponents, rather than working together to accomplish good
>things.

Ah, the fresh voice of reason at last. Thanks. I was beginning to
think Christians had lost sight of the wisdom of their savior.

[Matt Barrow]

> As opposed to the right, who are anti-death (abortion) except when they
> aren't (death-penalty).

Boy, now there's one of the best examples of childish rationalizing I've see
in a longggg time.

[Steven P. McNicoll]

"Peter Duniho" > wrote in message
...
>
> As opposed to the right, who are anti-death (abortion) except when they
> aren't (death-penalty).
>
> Face it: no matter which side of the fence you're on, you can easily
> over-simplify the other side's views and paint them as hypocritical. And
> both sides do, over and over.
>

Neither side opposes the death penalty completely. The right believes the
death penalty should be reserved for the guilty, while left believes the
death penalty should be reserved for the innocent.

[Skylune]

by Larry Dighera > Apr 29, 2006 at 04:12 PM




Because the President is spending your grandchildren's' income taxes
on wars...

<<

And on subsidies to GA airports.

[Larry Dighera]

On Mon, 01 May 2006 10:09:58 -0400, "Skylune"
> wrote in
utaviation.com>::

>by Larry Dighera > Apr 29, 2006 at 04:12 PM
>
>Because the President is spending your grandchildren's' income taxes
>on wars...
>
><<
>
>And on subsidies to GA airports.
>

You are fortunate that it will have no effect on your progeny, as I'm
sure your keepers wouldn't allow you to breed. :-)

[ted]

"AJ" > wrote in message
oups.com...
> Just look what the current administration did to NASA's Science
> Exploration Division.
>
> AJ
>

Nasa doesn't have a "science exploration division"

[ted]

"Steven P. McNicoll" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Aluckyguess wrote:
>>
>>Why dont they just use the military. We dont need fema. A waste of money.
>> Give it to the army.
>>
>
> Give FEMA to the Army? What would the Army do with FEMA?
>

Soylent green.

[ted]

"Steven P. McNicoll" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
> "Sam Spade" > wrote in message
> news:Hxt4g.174441$bm6.30468@fed1read04...
>>
>> Not hardly. Only the stock market is booming, but stay tuned.
>>
>
> The economy IS booming. You need to find a better news source.
>

Or a better job.