Re: 9/11 Smoking Gun! Flight 93 Rare News Footage From The Crash Site

[John Keeney]

Finally wrote:
> 1. There was no Flight 93 Plane at the crash site.
> 2. The official story of Flight 93 from the very beginning was/is a lie.

You know, Flight 93 came down rather steeply and at a pretty good clip,
not much in the way of visible parts should be expected. Most of the
plane will have been completely destroyed and most of what wasn't is
going to have buried itself.
A B-1 had a cabin fire over Kentucky some years back; after the crew
ejected the plane came down rather sedately -much lower speed and
flying pretty flat. I remember watching the TV news 'copter footage and
thinking "where's the plane?"

[Flyingmonk]

John Keeney wrote:
> Finally wrote:
> > 1. There was no Flight 93 Plane at the crash site.
> > 2. The official story of Flight 93 from the very beginning was/is a lie.
>
> You know, Flight 93 came down rather steeply and at a pretty good clip,
> not much in the way of visible parts should be expected. Most of the
> plane will have been completely destroyed and most of what wasn't is
> going to have buried itself.
> A B-1 had a cabin fire over Kentucky some years back; after the crew
> ejected the plane came down rather sedately -much lower speed and
> flying pretty flat. I remember watching the TV news 'copter footage and
> thinking "where's the plane?"

On a siimilar note, I sorta remember that some years back a mil pilot
went AWOL with a plane loaded with bombs somewhere in the Colorado
mountains? Whatever happened in that case? Did the plane crash? Did
it land somewhere? Did they ever find the plane/bombs?

The Monk

[Peter R.]

Flyingmonk > wrote:

> On a siimilar note, I sorta remember that some years back a mil pilot
> went AWOL with a plane loaded with bombs somewhere in the Colorado
> mountains? Whatever happened in that case? Did the plane crash? Did
> it land somewhere? Did they ever find the plane/bombs?

If you are referring to the A10 that mysteriously broke formation, then
shot northward up to the mountains of Colorado and crashed then yes, the
aircraft was located but apparently the bombs were not. This happened back
in 1997 and the investigation concluded it was a most likely a suicide:

http://www.cnn.com/US/9709/16/briefs.pm/air.force.crash/

http://www.cnn.com/US/9710/24/a10.crash/index.html

--
Peter

[Steve Hix]

In article . com>,
"John Keeney" > wrote:

> Finally wrote:
> > 1. There was no Flight 93 Plane at the crash site.
> > 2. The official story of Flight 93 from the very beginning was/is a lie.
>
> You know, Flight 93 came down rather steeply and at a pretty good clip,
> not much in the way of visible parts should be expected. Most of the
> plane will have been completely destroyed and most of what wasn't is
> going to have buried itself.
> A B-1 had a cabin fire over Kentucky some years back; after the crew
> ejected the plane came down rather sedately -much lower speed and
> flying pretty flat. I remember watching the TV news 'copter footage and
> thinking "where's the plane?"

Dave Berry wrote a (serious) article about the Flight 93 site some time
back. Much of it involved discussion of the results with the Somerset
County coroner. They're still finding bits and pieces of the aircraft,
most of them unrecognizable.

They found about 600 lbs of remains, about 250 lbs of that could be DNA
typed (and returned to the families for burial). According to the
coroner, "There were people who were getting a skull cap and a tooth in
the casket, that was their loved ones."

It was published in 2002, title "On Hallowed Ground":

http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/living/columnists/dave_barry/3972571
..htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp

The best anyone can say about "Finally" and his ilk are that they are
willfully ignorant buffoons.

[Flyingmonk]

Yes Peter, that's what I was refering to. Thanks for the links. So
they never found the bombs huh? Did he dropped them first before
crashing?

The Monk

[Peter R.]

Flyingmonk > wrote:

> Yes Peter, that's what I was refering to. Thanks for the links. So
> they never found the bombs huh? Did he dropped them first before
> crashing?

No idea, but even the articles a year later stated that the bombs were
never found, so my guess is no.


--
Peter

[mrtravel]

Steve Hix wrote:

> In article . com>,
> "John Keeney" > wrote:
>
>
>>Finally wrote:
>>
>>>1. There was no Flight 93 Plane at the crash site.
>>>2. The official story of Flight 93 from the very beginning was/is a lie.
>>
>>You know, Flight 93 came down rather steeply and at a pretty good clip,
>>not much in the way of visible parts should be expected. Most of the
>>plane will have been completely destroyed and most of what wasn't is
>>going to have buried itself.
>>A B-1 had a cabin fire over Kentucky some years back; after the crew
>>ejected the plane came down rather sedately -much lower speed and
>>flying pretty flat. I remember watching the TV news 'copter footage and
>>thinking "where's the plane?"
>
>
> Dave Berry wrote a (serious) article about the Flight 93 site some time
> back.

I thought he was only a basketball expert.

[mrtravel]

Peter R. wrote:

> Flyingmonk > wrote:
>
>
>>Yes Peter, that's what I was refering to. Thanks for the links. So
>>they never found the bombs huh? Did he dropped them first before
>>crashing?
>
>
> No idea, but even the articles a year later stated that the bombs were
> never found, so my guess is no.
>
>

Wasn't his last name Travolta?