Alternator longevity

[a]

We have a Motorola 60A alternator on our Glasair that S/H offered as an
option 20 years ago. Ostensibly a Heavy Duty model for police cruisers. Came
with larger pulley to reduce rotational speed, reverse fan for proper
cooling with Lyc engine. Still, I have to overhaul it every 400 to 500
hours.

In eleven years, have had to replace one case half (fretting at the bearing
cup), bearings (upgraded to HD bearings, but not much improvement - they
still start making noise at 500 hours), and this last time, the stator
failed from vibration. (It came loose in the housing and a wire broke.) Just
about every part has failed after 2600 hrs except the rotor. I'm paying
about $50 per overhaul, and have about $250 invested. Have a blast tube
blowing on the alternator for some cooling. The belt has always been fairly
loose, so as to not put excessive side loads on the bearing. Prop has been
balanced.

I never hear of my fellow homebuilders fixing their alternators. Am
wondering what kind of time between overhaul you with more than 1000 hours
are seeing on front mount alternators? What lasts the longest?

I'd switch to the Nippon everyone seems to use, but we have an old narrow
deck engine, and I have a funky, custom case mount bracket arrangement that
I'd rather not re-engineer if I don't have to. (That is, the wide deck uses
a standard boss mount bracket, that most of the after market alternators are
designed to fit. Not so easy for us.)

Thanks,

Mike Palmer <><

Info on Glasair gear bracket crack
www.members.cox.net/mp palmer (take out the space)

[Orval Fairbairn]

In article >, "a" > wrote:

> We have a Motorola 60A alternator on our Glasair that S/H offered as an
> option 20 years ago. Ostensibly a Heavy Duty model for police cruisers. Came
> with larger pulley to reduce rotational speed, reverse fan for proper
> cooling with Lyc engine. Still, I have to overhaul it every 400 to 500
> hours.
>
> In eleven years, have had to replace one case half (fretting at the bearing
> cup), bearings (upgraded to HD bearings, but not much improvement - they
> still start making noise at 500 hours), and this last time, the stator
> failed from vibration. (It came loose in the housing and a wire broke.) Just
> about every part has failed after 2600 hrs except the rotor. I'm paying
> about $50 per overhaul, and have about $250 invested. Have a blast tube
> blowing on the alternator for some cooling. The belt has always been fairly
> loose, so as to not put excessive side loads on the bearing. Prop has been
> balanced.
>
> I never hear of my fellow homebuilders fixing their alternators. Am
> wondering what kind of time between overhaul you with more than 1000 hours
> are seeing on front mount alternators? What lasts the longest?
>
> I'd switch to the Nippon everyone seems to use, but we have an old narrow
> deck engine, and I have a funky, custom case mount bracket arrangement that
> I'd rather not re-engineer if I don't have to. (That is, the wide deck uses
> a standard boss mount bracket, that most of the after market alternators are
> designed to fit. Not so easy for us.)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike Palmer <><
>
> Info on Glasair gear bracket crack
> www.members.cox.net/mp palmer (take out the space)

I have a JASCO Skytronics 50 amp job I installed in 1983, on my Johnson
Rocket, with no problems whatsoever. It has a unique mounting system, in
that it is driven via an isolation gear, which is mounted in a housing
containing a double ball bearing, so that all the alternator sees is
pure torque. The gear/bearing/housing takes all the side loads. The mags
are driven in a similar fashion.

[RST Engineering]

I'd worry less about side loads on the bearing and more about the loose belt
causing chatter under load. Torque the belt up to the manufacturer's
recommendations and see if you don't get better life out of your device.

"Fretting" and "case crack" just jump out at me as some sort of vibration
caused by something "loose", in this case the drive belt.

Jim




"a" > wrote in message ...


The belt has always been fairly
> loose, so as to not put excessive side loads on the bearing.