Log in

View Full Version : Landing a C5 Galaxy in Central Park


November 9th 06, 07:44 PM
Working on a movie script idea about the 911 attack on the WTC where
the crew of a blackop C5 Galaxy loaded with two SS Chinooks at Fort Dix
decide to take matters into their own hands when they receive a strange
radio message indicating that the World Trade Center has been attacked
and that thousands of people were stranded on the upper floors.

Big lines in the movie:

It's an agency hit and we shouldn't care! What the hell does that mean?

I can't just sit here and let all those people die.

Sir, we can't just steal a C5 Galaxy.

Just where do you plan on landing this bird? We'll be locked out of
JFK, Laguardia, and Newark.

You plan on flying up the Hudson Valley? When was the last time you
flew a C5 Galaxy under the George Washington Bridge?

You plan on landing this fat duck in Central Park?

Sir, I don't think that's in the flight manual.


And, for those who don't know what a Lockheed C5 Galaxy is:

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/266530/2006_dover_afb_airshow_c_5_galaxy_demonstration/

Gives a new meaning to the word "Transporter".

Unloading the SS Chinooks and getting the people out of the WTC while
putting out
the fires in the building__and a happy ending except for the huge UFO
that slowly fades
into view and then dissapears.

I'll work on the rest of the movie when Spileberg, Bruckheimer, Harlin,
Petersen, or any
other action movie director contacts me.

Sincerely,

Wayne E. Manzo,
Publisher, Producer, Human Rights Leader,
www.mansueact.com

Orlando, FL

jeremy
November 9th 06, 10:29 PM
wrote:
> Working on a movie script idea about the 911 attack on the WTC where
> the crew of a blackop C5 Galaxy loaded with two SS Chinooks at Fort Dix
> decide to take matters into their own hands when they receive a strange
> radio message indicating that the World Trade Center has been attacked
> and that thousands of people were stranded on the upper floors.
>
> Big lines in the movie:
>
> It's an agency hit and we shouldn't care! What the hell does that mean?
>
> I can't just sit here and let all those people die.
>
> Sir, we can't just steal a C5 Galaxy.
>
> Just where do you plan on landing this bird? We'll be locked out of
> JFK, Laguardia, and Newark.
>
> You plan on flying up the Hudson Valley? When was the last time you
> flew a C5 Galaxy under the George Washington Bridge?
>
> You plan on landing this fat duck in Central Park?
>
> Sir, I don't think that's in the flight manual.
>
>
> And, for those who don't know what a Lockheed C5 Galaxy is:
>
> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/266530/2006_dover_afb_airshow_c_5_galaxy_demonstration/
>
> Gives a new meaning to the word "Transporter".
>
> Unloading the SS Chinooks and getting the people out of the WTC while
> putting out
> the fires in the building__and a happy ending except for the huge UFO
> that slowly fades
> into view and then dissapears.
>
> I'll work on the rest of the movie when Spileberg, Bruckheimer, Harlin,
> Petersen, or any
> other action movie director contacts me.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Wayne E. Manzo,
> Publisher, Producer, Human Rights Leader,
> www.mansueact.com
>
> Orlando, FL
>


Get a writer with some talent and learn a bit about military hardware,
capabilities, procedures, unless of course you intend it as a comedy, if so
hire a team of writers.

JJ

Ed Stasiak
November 9th 06, 11:29 PM
> wrote
>
> You plan on landing this fat duck in Central Park?

That ain't gunna happen, but you probably could land
a YMC-130H Hercules there;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Credible_Sport

http://aeroweb.brooklyn.cuny.edu/database/aircraft/getimage.htm?id=10838

November 10th 06, 12:06 AM
Dear Ed,

You still don't understand. Why would the agency hit America?
And, its a "Black Op" C5 Galaxy, those black ducks are highly modified.
Also, what is the landing requirement for a C5? Then look at the
length of the "Great Lawn"? That "Turtle Pond" at the South end might
be a problem.

Also, you think the "Agency" is going to allow Americans to stop
an highly sophisticated "Agency Hit" on America? Those big GE fans
will flame out in an instant when the fuel supply system gets scammed
by you know who.

Anyway, its a Hollywood movie about "The Agency" and the real
technology
that is being used. Hey, what about that mansueact.com site?

>From Orlando where Mickey figured out these people are fakes and after
being touched by them turned into Minnie Mouse,

Wayne Manzo,
Publisher, Human Rights Leader, Scientist


Ed Stasiak wrote:
> > wrote
> >
> > You plan on landing this fat duck in Central Park?
>
> That ain't gunna happen, but you probably could land
> a YMC-130H Hercules there;
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Credible_Sport
>
> http://aeroweb.brooklyn.cuny.edu/database/aircraft/getimage.htm?id=10838

November 10th 06, 12:07 AM
Dear Ed,

You still don't understand. Why would the agency hit America?
And, its a "Black Op" C5 Galaxy, those black ducks are highly modified.
Also, what is the landing requirement for a C5? Then look at the
length of the "Great Lawn"? That "Turtle Pond" at the South end might
be a problem.

Also, you think the "Agency" is going to allow Americans to stop
an highly sophisticated "Agency Hit" on America? Those big GE fans
will flame out in an instant when the fuel supply system gets scammed
by you know who.

Anyway, its a Hollywood movie about "The Agency" and the real
technology
that is being used. Hey, what about that mansueact.com site?

>From Orlando where Mickey figured out these people are fakes and after
being touched by them turned into Minnie Mouse,

Wayne Manzo,
Publisher, Human Rights Leader, Scientist


Ed Stasiak wrote:
> > wrote
> >
> > You plan on landing this fat duck in Central Park?
>
> That ain't gunna happen, but you probably could land
> a YMC-130H Hercules there;
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Credible_Sport
>
> http://aeroweb.brooklyn.cuny.edu/database/aircraft/getimage.htm?id=10838

November 10th 06, 01:55 AM
Its a Hollywood movie and the emotional feeling of a C5 transport
coming in low and slow over Harlem blowing the windows out of Slick
Willie Clinton's office windows and then clipping the trees as it
screams down onto the Great Lawn of Central Park__well, that is a bit
more emotional than landing at an abandoned airstrip while a go-cart
race in going on. And, then having the fake "Agency" NYPD surround the
plane and force the crew into a situation that you know they will get
out of in order to get the Black SS Chinooks(think of an integration of
the
Camanche with the Super Chinook) down to the WTC before the towers
fall. The big question is how do they lift the pumper to the top of the
Millenium building? Remember, this is Hollywood.

Also, back to reality, we don't need a military as long as those "Alien
Warships" are
still hanging around upstairs.

>From Co-Orlando,

Wayne E. Manzo,
The last man standing!

John~

wrote:
> Bring the C5 into Stewart Field in Newburgh, 60 miles up the river.
> C-5s are based there and nobody will even notice.
>
> Bring the Chinooks down the river, wheels in the water at VNE. They
> can be there in a flash. Again, nobody will even notice.
>
> For the Chinooks you need a 21st Century version of Guns-A-Go-Go. Get
> your ideas from http://gunsagogo.org/
>
> You have imagination; use it.
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
>
> In article . com>,
> > wrote:
>
> > Working on a movie script idea about the 911 attack on the WTC where
> > the crew of a blackop C5 Galaxy loaded with two SS Chinooks at Fort Dix
> > decide to take matters into their own hands when they receive a strange
> > radio message indicating that the World Trade Center has been attacked
> > and that thousands of people were stranded on the upper floors.
> >
> > Big lines in the movie:
> >
> > It's an agency hit and we shouldn't care! What the hell does that mean?
> >
> > I can't just sit here and let all those people die.
> >
> > Sir, we can't just steal a C5 Galaxy.
> >
> > Just where do you plan on landing this bird? We'll be locked out of
> > JFK, Laguardia, and Newark.
> >
> > You plan on flying up the Hudson Valley? When was the last time you
> > flew a C5 Galaxy under the George Washington Bridge?
> >
> > You plan on landing this fat duck in Central Park?
> >
> > Sir, I don't think that's in the flight manual.
> >
> >
> > And, for those who don't know what a Lockheed C5 Galaxy is:
> >
> >
> > http://www.metacafe.com/watch/266530/2006_dover_afb_airshow_c_5_galaxy_demonst
> > ration/
> >
> > Gives a new meaning to the word "Transporter".
> >
> > Unloading the SS Chinooks and getting the people out of the WTC while
> > putting out
> > the fires in the building__and a happy ending except for the huge UFO
> > that slowly fades
> > into view and then dissapears.
> >
> > I'll work on the rest of the movie when Spileberg, Bruckheimer, Harlin,
> > Petersen, or any
> > other action movie director contacts me.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > Wayne E. Manzo,
> > Publisher, Producer, Human Rights Leader,
> > www.mansueact.com
> >
> > Orlando, FL

Orval Fairbairn
November 10th 06, 03:40 AM
In article . com>,
wrote:

> Working on a movie script idea about the 911 attack on the WTC where
> the crew of a blackop C5 Galaxy loaded with two SS Chinooks at Fort Dix
> decide to take matters into their own hands when they receive a strange
> radio message indicating that the World Trade Center has been attacked
> and that thousands of people were stranded on the upper floors.
>
> Big lines in the movie:
>
> It's an agency hit and we shouldn't care! What the hell does that mean?
>
> I can't just sit here and let all those people die.
>
> Sir, we can't just steal a C5 Galaxy.
>
> Just where do you plan on landing this bird? We'll be locked out of
> JFK, Laguardia, and Newark.
>
> You plan on flying up the Hudson Valley? When was the last time you
> flew a C5 Galaxy under the George Washington Bridge?
>
> You plan on landing this fat duck in Central Park?
>
> Sir, I don't think that's in the flight manual.
>
>
> And, for those who don't know what a Lockheed C5 Galaxy is:
>
> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/266530/2006_dover_afb_airshow_c_5_galaxy_demonst
> ration/
>
> Gives a new meaning to the word "Transporter".
>
> Unloading the SS Chinooks and getting the people out of the WTC while
> putting out
> the fires in the building__and a happy ending except for the huge UFO
> that slowly fades
> into view and then dissapears.
>
> I'll work on the rest of the movie when Spileberg, Bruckheimer, Harlin,
> Petersen, or any
> other action movie director contacts me.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Wayne E. Manzo,
> Publisher, Producer, Human Rights Leader,
> www.mansueact.com
>
> Orlando, FL

Wayne,

Please DON'T quit your day job!

Ragnar
November 10th 06, 11:28 AM
Hey, its Wayne Manzo, the man who works for the Aliens he supposedly
despises. They guy lives in a dreamworld and is as crazy as they get.
Check out his website. Full of moonbat crap.

> http://www.geocities.com/mansuedotcom/plaintf2.html

WaltBJ
November 10th 06, 07:50 PM
Sure you can land a C5 in Central Park. Actually, the word is more
properly 'crash-land'. Everybody is going to die and the airplane burn
to ashes but hey - it's Hollywood! Hell, you can land a C5 on a carrier
- if you can swim really well. I think the word I'm looking for is
"Schlockmeister". Sheesh. Wayne, go watch the Israeli movie 'Entebbe'
and see what can realistically be done.
Walt BJ

Ragnar wrote:
> Hey, it's Wayne Manzo, the man who works for the Aliens he supposedly
> despises. This guy lives in a dreamworld and is as crazy as they get.
> Check out his website. Full of moonbat crap.
>
> > http://www.geocities.com/mansuedotcom/plaintf2.html

November 10th 06, 08:02 PM
WaltBJ wrote:
> Sure you can land a C5 in Central Park. Actually, the word is more
> properly 'crash-land'. Everybody is going to die and the airplane burn
> to ashes but hey - it's Hollywood! Hell, you can land a C5 on a carrier
> - if you can swim really well. I think the word I'm looking for is
> "Schlockmeister". Sheesh. Wayne, go watch the Israeli movie 'Entebbe'
> and see what can realistically be done.
> Walt BJ

SNIP

Well to be fair, and to get a word in edge-wise before he gets the
thorough caning he so rightly deserves, the C-5 >was< drsigned to
operate from short, rough fields. Of course, in the case of of the
Galaxy, "short" and "rough" are relative. So far as I know, no one has
ever attempted "for real" to use the C-5 as an assault
transport....memories of that wheel bounding down the runway sans
aircraft after a demonstration of this "capability" before a
Congressional delegation and a national TV and press pool are still
too vivid in the USAF even after 40 years or so

jeremy
November 11th 06, 06:02 AM
wrote:
So far as I know, no one has
> ever attempted "for real" to use the C-5 as an assault
> transport.

I here of some bozo who had the bright idea of reversing the JATO mountings
from a c-130 to shorten the run out. Had to swap out both inners due to
"pitting". What really happened is that every rock under 5 lbs was tossed
forward and a good number tried to negotiate the intakes under full reverse
thrust. It did cut the landing from 1,500 meters to about 1,000 but I think
the necessity for flying in two engine replacements and doing the change out
in less than ideal conditions prevented a repeat performance.

John Keeney
November 11th 06, 07:05 AM
wrote:
> WaltBJ wrote:
> > Sure you can land a C5 in Central Park. Actually, the word is more
> > properly 'crash-land'. Everybody is going to die and the airplane burn
> > to ashes but hey - it's Hollywood! Hell, you can land a C5 on a carrier
> > - if you can swim really well. I think the word I'm looking for is
> > "Schlockmeister". Sheesh. Wayne, go watch the Israeli movie 'Entebbe'
> > and see what can realistically be done.
> > Walt BJ
>
> SNIP
>
> Well to be fair, and to get a word in edge-wise before he gets the
> thorough caning he so rightly deserves, the C-5 >was< drsigned to
> operate from short, rough fields. Of course, in the case of of the
> Galaxy, "short" and "rough" are relative. So far as I know, no one has
> ever attempted "for real" to use the C-5 as an assault
> transport....memories of that wheel bounding down the runway sans
> aircraft after a demonstration of this "capability" before a
> Congressional delegation and a national TV and press pool are still
> too vivid in the USAF even after 40 years or so

You sure that wasn't a proper (aka "paved") runway?

November 11th 06, 08:48 AM
John Keeney wrote:
> wrote:
> > WaltBJ wrote:
> > > Sure you can land a C5 in Central Park. Actually, the word is more
> > > properly 'crash-land'. Everybody is going to die and the airplane burn
> > > to ashes but hey - it's Hollywood! Hell, you can land a C5 on a carrier
> > > - if you can swim really well. I think the word I'm looking for is
> > > "Schlockmeister". Sheesh. Wayne, go watch the Israeli movie 'Entebbe'
> > > and see what can realistically be done.
> > > Walt BJ
> >
> > SNIP
> >
> > Well to be fair, and to get a word in edge-wise before he gets the
> > thorough caning he so rightly deserves, the C-5 >was< designed to
> > operate from short, rough fields. Of course, in the case of of the
> > Galaxy, "short" and "rough" are relative. So far as I know, no one has
> > ever attempted "for real" to use the C-5 as an assault
> > transport....memories of that wheel bounding down the runway sans
> > aircraft after a demonstration of this "capability" before a
> > Congressional delegation and a national TV and press pool are still
> > too vivid in the USAF even after 40 years or so
>
> You sure that wasn't a proper (aka "paved") runway?

SNIP

Might have been...memories get misty...let me check....although if it
was, that made things even worse - "if it does THAT on a proper runway,
what the %#2& will happen on a tactical strip or a stretch of
autobahn?"

Found this..looks like you're right...thanks for the correction!

"Rolled out at Lockheed's Marietta plant on the 2nd of March 1968, the
first C-5 (66-8303) of an intial order of five, was prepared for
initial trails at Dobbins AFB. The 94-minute maiden trouble-free
flight, with Loe J. Sullivan as pilot and Walter E. Hensleigh as
co-pilot, was made from this Goergia base on the 30th of June 1968.
Located in Marietta, this airfield is known as Dobbins AFB by the USAF
and by the USN as NAS Atlanta. Since early 1951, the runway and other
facilities have been shared with Lockheed-Georgia Company.

The first phase of manufacturer's flight trials proceeded without major
problems (exempt for the loss of a main wheel during a routine landing
accident; after the aircraft came to a standstill, the wheel was
replaced, with the media having a field day with this event),"

November 11th 06, 03:37 PM
wrote:
> Working on a movie script idea about the 911 attack on the WTC where
> the crew of a blackop C5 Galaxy loaded with two SS Chinooks at Fort Dix
> decide to take matters into their own hands when they receive a strange
> radio message indicating that the World Trade Center has been attacked
> and that thousands of people were stranded on the upper floors.
>
> Big lines in the movie:
>
> It's an agency hit and we shouldn't care! What the hell does that mean?
>
> I can't just sit here and let all those people die.
>
> Sir, we can't just steal a C5 Galaxy.
>
> Just where do you plan on landing this bird? We'll be locked out of
> JFK, Laguardia, and Newark.
>
> You plan on flying up the Hudson Valley? When was the last time you
> flew a C5 Galaxy under the George Washington Bridge?
>
> You plan on landing this fat duck in Central Park?
>
> Sir, I don't think that's in the flight manual.
>
>
> And, for those who don't know what a Lockheed C5 Galaxy is:
>
> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/266530/2006_dover_afb_airshow_c_5_galaxy_demonstration/
>
> Gives a new meaning to the word "Transporter".
>
> Unloading the SS Chinooks and getting the people out of the WTC while
> putting out
> the fires in the building__and a happy ending except for the huge UFO
> that slowly fades
> into view and then dissapears.
>
> I'll work on the rest of the movie when Spileberg, Bruckheimer, Harlin,
> Petersen, or any
> other action movie director contacts me.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Wayne E. Manzo,
> Publisher, Producer, Human Rights Leader,
> www.mansueact.com
>
> Orlando, FL

Why not just steal the choppers and fly them directly to the site? You
might want to investigate the time it takes to get a chopper out of a
cargo plane and capable of flight.

Flying a CN235, while not having much cargo capability, would be more
believable since these are in both civilian and military hands, not to
mention the CIA already owns some using front companies.

This movie will be right up there in accuracy like "Air Force One."

November 11th 06, 04:50 PM
wrote:
> >>>
> This movie will be right up there in accuracy like "Air Force One."

Or more like "Capricorn One"

Diamond Jim
November 11th 06, 11:42 PM
> wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> wrote:
>> >>>
>> This movie will be right up there in accuracy like "Air Force One."
>
> Or more like "Capricorn One"
>
ROTFLMAO! Why do people have to make things so complicated? Hell its only a
30 minute flight (60 miles or so) at the most by a CH-47 from FtDix/McGuire
AFB to Manhatten. It would take a lot longer than that to load or unload
them from a C-5.

John Keeney
November 12th 06, 06:06 AM
Diamond Jim wrote:
> > wrote in message
> oups.com...
> >
> > wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> This movie will be right up there in accuracy like "Air Force One."
> >
> > Or more like "Capricorn One"
> >
> ROTFLMAO! Why do people have to make things so complicated? Hell its only a
> 30 minute flight (60 miles or so) at the most by a CH-47 from FtDix/McGuire
> AFB to Manhatten. It would take a lot longer than that to load or unload
> them from a C-5.

Because he WANTS the C-5 to land in Central Park.
And besides, uh, ahmm, oh, the helicopters were allready loaded on the
C-5 to go some where else when they decided to steal them! YEA, THAT'S
THE TICKET!

Diamond Jim
November 12th 06, 04:14 PM
"John Keeney" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Diamond Jim wrote:
>> > wrote in message
>> oups.com...
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> This movie will be right up there in accuracy like "Air Force One."
>> >
>> > Or more like "Capricorn One"
>> >
>> ROTFLMAO! Why do people have to make things so complicated? Hell its only
>> a
>> 30 minute flight (60 miles or so) at the most by a CH-47 from
>> FtDix/McGuire
>> AFB to Manhatten. It would take a lot longer than that to load or unload
>> them from a C-5.
>
> Because he WANTS the C-5 to land in Central Park.
> And besides, uh, ahmm, oh, the helicopters were allready loaded on the
> C-5 to go some where else when they decided to steal them! YEA, THAT'S
> THE TICKET!
>
Well how the hell are you going to rescue anyone from a window on the side
of a burning building anyway? You can't get a helicopter that close. As for
landing on the roof, through the smoke, updrafts, no problem righttttttttt!
What a bunch of BS.

Ed Rasimus[_1_]
November 12th 06, 06:05 PM
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 16:14:00 GMT, "Diamond Jim" >
wrote:

>
>"John Keeney" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>>
>> Diamond Jim wrote:
>>> > wrote in message
>>> oups.com...
>>> >
>>> > wrote:
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> This movie will be right up there in accuracy like "Air Force One."
>>> >
>>> > Or more like "Capricorn One"
>>> >
>>> ROTFLMAO! Why do people have to make things so complicated? Hell its only
>>> a
>>> 30 minute flight (60 miles or so) at the most by a CH-47 from
>>> FtDix/McGuire
>>> AFB to Manhatten. It would take a lot longer than that to load or unload
>>> them from a C-5.
>>
>> Because he WANTS the C-5 to land in Central Park.
>> And besides, uh, ahmm, oh, the helicopters were allready loaded on the
>> C-5 to go some where else when they decided to steal them! YEA, THAT'S
>> THE TICKET!
>>
>Well how the hell are you going to rescue anyone from a window on the side
>of a burning building anyway? You can't get a helicopter that close. As for
>landing on the roof, through the smoke, updrafts, no problem righttttttttt!
>What a bunch of BS.
>

You might want to review the news coverage of the Las Vegas hotel fire
at the MGM Grand about 20 years ago. Both window and rooftop
extractions by helicopter were accomplished. Noteworthy was the fact
that Korean War hero Boots Blesse was among the guests rescued.


Ed Rasimus
Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret)
"When Thunder Rolled"
www.thunderchief.org
www.thundertales.blogspot.com

WaltBJ
November 13th 06, 02:00 AM
If you can find a copy of "Check Six" you can read Boots' elucidation
of the MGM Grand fire. ISTR they were on the 25th floor. Boots was his
usual cool self, but I was really impressed by his lady's actions. She
just said something like 'Tell em what to do-" he did, and she did it!
Just think about stepping off the balcony 25 stories up. She'd do to
ride the river with! For short landings - I used to have a videotape of
a 727 doing a maximum performance short field landing. The aircraft was
stopped in less than 1400 feet of ground roll. The 727 is a little
unique in that it came from the factory with nose wheel brakes, but
they won't engage unless braking effort exceeds something like at least
80% of maximum. Alas, the tape was left with the college when I
retired.
Walt BJ

November 14th 06, 02:08 AM
Ok, it's a C5X and is radically different from the C5 Gal from the 60s.
This is a stretched version of the C5 with X modified Pratt high bypass
turbofans having a very low sound signature(hear the fan and first
stage low pressure compressor screaming in the video of the old C5?
Sounds like a buzz saw flying around) and tons of thrust.

Also, the plane is totally composite except for primary load
structures and it has radar cloaking capability making it a truly ghost
transport. Which comes in handy when those American and Russian
military platforms in orbit lock on the C5Xs when they approach the
Hudson Bay area.

Secondly, the story is shaping up like "Top Gun" with C5 transports.
There are two of them that lift off for NYC from Dover or Macguire. The
Tom Cruise character responds to the WTC attack instantly after hearing
that there is no rotocraft activity allowed in the area and figures its
an "Agency" hit and those people stuck in the towers are to be
sacrificed. His buddy then finds out why Maverick took off in such a
hurry and then decides to join him because of the dangerousness of the
"bootleg" mission while complaining that he hates fighting spooks__a
crewman questions "but sir, aren't we the spooks?" As they re-board the
C5X his pet Pilgrim goose "Demelza" in the flight suit with the "T
Tail" waddles away. Jumping back on the tarmac he chases the bird and
orders her into the plane. Eleven years of Black Op missions and this
flight scares her? He picks up the goose and re-enters the plane.

The engines of the second C5X spool up and the giant aircraft rolls
down the runway when they number 4 starboard engine encounters "spook
hits" that weaken the atomic bonds in the first stage high pressure
power turbine blades, the blades fail catastrophically resulting in a
huge explosion and only three engines for takeoff. Way too heavy with
the "Spook Chinook" in the belly the flight engineer starts dumping
fuel. As they approach V1 the runway is disappearing fast___

And, if you want to know the rest, as the saying goes, buy the rights.

And, since my IBM StinkPad was stolen from beneath my fingers about two
weeks ago(Crack-Head Zombies put the Voo-Doo on me) I bid on another
junk machine on Ebay. This time it's an old Dell Inspiron clicking over
at a slow .4g but fast enough for simple jscript designing and simple
gfx.

What about that scandal page based on my true story as a human pawn
employed at NASA-Lewis Research Center for the US Army Propulsion
Directorate(US Army Aviation System Command). Who knew the Army office
was CIA and I was set-up in a "spook trap" with imposter Army
employees?

www.mansueact.com/mansue.com/scandal.html

Anyway, maybe I can get some initial funding to work on the rest of the
script. And, I'll probably need an Army of Aviation experts and
Scientists to get the script consistent with what we are dealing
with__"Alien Spooks".

Maybe I should call some of the major Hollywood actor production
companies? Mel Gibson and Icon Productions, George Clooney and Mayville
Pictures, Tom Cruise and C/W Productions, Nicholas Cage and Saturn
Films, Alec Baldwin and El Dorado Pictures, Emilio Estevez and Estevez
Productions, Pierce Brosnan and Irish Dreamtime, Will Smith and
Overbrook Entertainment, or maybe a woman flight commander makes the
decision to fight the "Agency" and save the people and the WTC? Jodie
Foster and Egg Pictures, Demi Moore and Moving Pictures.

But, since the "Agency" controls the entertainment industry, porno
industry, and news media and all the major actors work for the "Agency"
and receive tons of free money for what they define as work___they are
not going to be interested in this type of movie concept.

>From the Mickey Mouse city of Orlando where Mickey was beamed upstairs
and now walks around the city dressed as Minnie while shouting "don't
touch me",

Wayne E. Manzo,
Publisher, TV Producer, Human Rights Leader
www.mansueact.com








The OTHER Kevin in San Diego wrote:
> On 12 Nov 2006 18:00:11 -0800, "WaltBJ" >
> wrote:
>
> >If you can find a copy of "Check Six" you can read Boots' elucidation
> >of the MGM Grand fire. ISTR they were on the 25th floor. Boots was his
> >usual cool self, but I was really impressed by his lady's actions. She
> >just said something like 'Tell em what to do-" he did, and she did it!
> >Just think about stepping off the balcony 25 stories up. She'd do to
> >ride the river with! For short landings - I used to have a videotape of
> >a 727 doing a maximum performance short field landing. The aircraft was
> >stopped in less than 1400 feet of ground roll. The 727 is a little
> >unique in that it came from the factory with nose wheel brakes, but
> >they won't engage unless braking effort exceeds something like at least
> >80% of maximum. Alas, the tape was left with the college when I
> >retired.
> >Walt BJ
>
> I experienced a short-field landing in a 727 back in '92. Was on my
> way to my honeymoon in the Bristish West Indies. The pilot had the
> thrust reversers in motion just before he planted the mains on the
> asphalt and then he stood on the brakes big time.
>
> If we hadn't been strapped in, we'd have been pulled out of the
> seats..

November 14th 06, 03:31 AM
If you don't believe that a C5 Galaxy can swallow a CH47 Super Chinook
take a look at this photograph:

http://www.chinook-helicopter.com/history/aircraft/australian/A15-103_C-17_a.jpg


>From Orlando,

Wayne E. Manzo,
Publisher


wrote:
> Ok, it's a C5X and is radically different from the C5 Gal from the 60s.
> This is a stretched version of the C5 with X modified Pratt high bypass
> turbofans having a very low sound signature(hear the fan and first
> stage low pressure compressor screaming in the video of the old C5?
> Sounds like a buzz saw flying around) and tons of thrust.
>
> Also, the plane is totally composite except for primary load
> structures and it has radar cloaking capability making it a truly ghost
> transport. Which comes in handy when those American and Russian
> military platforms in orbit lock on the C5Xs when they approach the
> Hudson Bay area.
>
> Secondly, the story is shaping up like "Top Gun" with C5 transports.
> There are two of them that lift off for NYC from Dover or Macguire. The
> Tom Cruise character responds to the WTC attack instantly after hearing
> that there is no rotocraft activity allowed in the area and figures its
> an "Agency" hit and those people stuck in the towers are to be
> sacrificed. His buddy then finds out why Maverick took off in such a
> hurry and then decides to join him because of the dangerousness of the
> "bootleg" mission while complaining that he hates fighting spooks__a
> crewman questions "but sir, aren't we the spooks?" As they re-board the
> C5X his pet Pilgrim goose "Demelza" in the flight suit with the "T
> Tail" waddles away. Jumping back on the tarmac he chases the bird and
> orders her into the plane. Eleven years of Black Op missions and this
> flight scares her? He picks up the goose and re-enters the plane.
>
> The engines of the second C5X spool up and the giant aircraft rolls
> down the runway when they number 4 starboard engine encounters "spook
> hits" that weaken the atomic bonds in the first stage high pressure
> power turbine blades, the blades fail catastrophically resulting in a
> huge explosion and only three engines for takeoff. Way too heavy with
> the "Spook Chinook" in the belly the flight engineer starts dumping
> fuel. As they approach V1 the runway is disappearing fast___
>
> And, if you want to know the rest, as the saying goes, buy the rights.
>
> And, since my IBM StinkPad was stolen from beneath my fingers about two
> weeks ago(Crack-Head Zombies put the Voo-Doo on me) I bid on another
> junk machine on Ebay. This time it's an old Dell Inspiron clicking over
> at a slow .4g but fast enough for simple jscript designing and simple
> gfx.
>
> What about that scandal page based on my true story as a human pawn
> employed at NASA-Lewis Research Center for the US Army Propulsion
> Directorate(US Army Aviation System Command). Who knew the Army office
> was CIA and I was set-up in a "spook trap" with imposter Army
> employees?
>
> www.mansueact.com/mansue.com/scandal.html
>
> Anyway, maybe I can get some initial funding to work on the rest of the
> script. And, I'll probably need an Army of Aviation experts and
> Scientists to get the script consistent with what we are dealing
> with__"Alien Spooks".
>
> Maybe I should call some of the major Hollywood actor production
> companies? Mel Gibson and Icon Productions, George Clooney and Mayville
> Pictures, Tom Cruise and C/W Productions, Nicholas Cage and Saturn
> Films, Alec Baldwin and El Dorado Pictures, Emilio Estevez and Estevez
> Productions, Pierce Brosnan and Irish Dreamtime, Will Smith and
> Overbrook Entertainment, or maybe a woman flight commander makes the
> decision to fight the "Agency" and save the people and the WTC? Jodie
> Foster and Egg Pictures, Demi Moore and Moving Pictures.
>
> But, since the "Agency" controls the entertainment industry, porno
> industry, and news media and all the major actors work for the "Agency"
> and receive tons of free money for what they define as work___they are
> not going to be interested in this type of movie concept.
>
> >From the Mickey Mouse city of Orlando where Mickey was beamed upstairs
> and now walks around the city dressed as Minnie while shouting "don't
> touch me",
>
> Wayne E. Manzo,
> Publisher, TV Producer, Human Rights Leader
> www.mansueact.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The OTHER Kevin in San Diego wrote:
> > On 12 Nov 2006 18:00:11 -0800, "WaltBJ" >
> > wrote:
> >
> > >If you can find a copy of "Check Six" you can read Boots' elucidation
> > >of the MGM Grand fire. ISTR they were on the 25th floor. Boots was his
> > >usual cool self, but I was really impressed by his lady's actions. She
> > >just said something like 'Tell em what to do-" he did, and she did it!
> > >Just think about stepping off the balcony 25 stories up. She'd do to
> > >ride the river with! For short landings - I used to have a videotape of
> > >a 727 doing a maximum performance short field landing. The aircraft was
> > >stopped in less than 1400 feet of ground roll. The 727 is a little
> > >unique in that it came from the factory with nose wheel brakes, but
> > >they won't engage unless braking effort exceeds something like at least
> > >80% of maximum. Alas, the tape was left with the college when I
> > >retired.
> > >Walt BJ
> >
> > I experienced a short-field landing in a 727 back in '92. Was on my
> > way to my honeymoon in the Bristish West Indies. The pilot had the
> > thrust reversers in motion just before he planted the mains on the
> > asphalt and then he stood on the brakes big time.
> >
> > If we hadn't been strapped in, we'd have been pulled out of the
> > seats..

Orval Fairbairn
November 14th 06, 04:08 AM
In article . com>,
wrote:

> Ok, it's a C5X and is radically different from the C5 Gal from the 60s.
> This is a stretched version of the C5 with X modified Pratt high bypass
> turbofans having a very low sound signature(hear the fan and first
> stage low pressure compressor screaming in the video of the old C5?
> Sounds like a buzz saw flying around) and tons of thrust.
>
> Also, the plane is totally composite except for primary load
> structures and it has radar cloaking capability making it a truly ghost
> transport. Which comes in handy when those American and Russian
> military platforms in orbit lock on the C5Xs when they approach the
> Hudson Bay area.
>
> Secondly, the story is shaping up like "Top Gun" with C5 transports.
(snip)

What, sir, have you been smoking? Please, DON'T quit your day job!

Ancient_Hacker
November 15th 06, 02:00 PM
Here's a few freebie plot points to perk up your story:

Have the C5A let out a grappling hook, swoop down over the DuPont
factory, and grab a 100 ton roll of Nomex, the 10 yard wide roll kind.

Have the C5A do tight circles around the WTC and wrap the nomex around
one building, snuffing out the fires, then circle the other way and
wrap the other tower.

I'll settle for 2% of the boxoffice gross, or $1, whichever is greater.

BigBadBrad
November 29th 06, 01:32 AM
It was conceived for an attempt at the Iran hostage rescue mission of the
later 70's.. If memory serves, the plan was to land inside a soccer stadium,
and then JATO out after the recovery of the hostages...The test video is
something to see...


"jeremy" > wrote in message
...
> wrote:
> So far as I know, no one has
>> ever attempted "for real" to use the C-5 as an assault
>> transport.
>
> I here of some bozo who had the bright idea of reversing the JATO
> mountings from a c-130 to shorten the run out. Had to swap out both inners
> due to "pitting". What really happened is that every rock under 5 lbs was
> tossed forward and a good number tried to negotiate the intakes under full
> reverse thrust. It did cut the landing from 1,500 meters to about 1,000
> but I think the necessity for flying in two engine replacements and doing
> the change out in less than ideal conditions prevented a repeat
> performance.

Google