Michael Baldwin, Bruce
December 6th 06, 12:57 PM
Bruce AKA the alleged jmalloy wrote:
> tholed interminably:
>
> >>>> Ask your, Tholen.
> >
> >>> Ask my what, Malloy?
> >
> >> Ha!
> >
> > I see that you didn't answer the question, Malloy. No surprise there,
> > really.
>
> I see you didn't give me a whit of a chance to answer, Tholen. Double
> ha, Tholen, but no surprise there, really, Tholen.
How ironical, Bruce.
> >> Tholen once claimed, as is his wont, something he knows little
> >> about, namely grammar (and in English, believe it or not!).
> >
> > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> "Lassic" unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, as usual for you, Tholen.
Its a "clasic", Bruce.
> >> He insisted that "your" and "yourself" are identical in meaning.
> >
> > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> I see you're denying history, Tholen. No surprise there, really, Tholen.
None what so ever, Bruce.
> >> And here he can't understand my answer!
> >
> > I see that you still didn't answer the question, Malloy. No surprise
> > there, really.
>
> I see you're denying history, Tholen. No surprise there, really,
> Tholen. (Hint: go google your.)
Dickless can't even Google Uranus, Bruce.
> >> What a buffoon he [Tholen] is!
>
> Truer words have not been spoken, if I do say so.
You do say so, Bruce. And I second that.
> > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
> > expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
>
> Your entire existence on uselessnet is unsubstantiated and erroneous
> claims, laced with invective, and expected from someone who lacks
> logical arguments, Tholen, so what you need not impart this bit of
> "wisdom", Tholen, we already know your type <shudder>.
Indeed, Bruce.
> As for the rest of your "poasting", there's no sense arguing with an
> idiot (that you, Tholen), Tholen.
A0L!
> tholed interminably:
>
> >>>> Ask your, Tholen.
> >
> >>> Ask my what, Malloy?
> >
> >> Ha!
> >
> > I see that you didn't answer the question, Malloy. No surprise there,
> > really.
>
> I see you didn't give me a whit of a chance to answer, Tholen. Double
> ha, Tholen, but no surprise there, really, Tholen.
How ironical, Bruce.
> >> Tholen once claimed, as is his wont, something he knows little
> >> about, namely grammar (and in English, believe it or not!).
> >
> > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> "Lassic" unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, as usual for you, Tholen.
Its a "clasic", Bruce.
> >> He insisted that "your" and "yourself" are identical in meaning.
> >
> > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> I see you're denying history, Tholen. No surprise there, really, Tholen.
None what so ever, Bruce.
> >> And here he can't understand my answer!
> >
> > I see that you still didn't answer the question, Malloy. No surprise
> > there, really.
>
> I see you're denying history, Tholen. No surprise there, really,
> Tholen. (Hint: go google your.)
Dickless can't even Google Uranus, Bruce.
> >> What a buffoon he [Tholen] is!
>
> Truer words have not been spoken, if I do say so.
You do say so, Bruce. And I second that.
> > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
> > expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
>
> Your entire existence on uselessnet is unsubstantiated and erroneous
> claims, laced with invective, and expected from someone who lacks
> logical arguments, Tholen, so what you need not impart this bit of
> "wisdom", Tholen, we already know your type <shudder>.
Indeed, Bruce.
> As for the rest of your "poasting", there's no sense arguing with an
> idiot (that you, Tholen), Tholen.
A0L!