FYI Bio zoom ZZZZZZZZ

[Juan Jimenez[_1_]]

Well, hell, no wonder this putz can't come up with a single solitary example
of aviation experience.

He doesn't have any. Not even a student pilot certificate. Looks like his
record in the FAA database is limited to exactly this:

Medical Class :Second
Medical Date:02/1985
LIMITED TO MILITARY CONTROLLER DUTIES.

CertIficates
1 of 1
DOI :02/14/1983
Certificate: CONTROL TOWER OPERATOR
Limits
SCHWAEBISCH HALL AAF, SCHWAEBISCH HALL, GERMANY

On top of that, he's limited to ATC at one single, solitary base on the
planet. Hmm. I don't even think the base even exists anymore. :)



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[Juan Jimenez[_1_]]

"Steve Foley" > wrote in message
news:xKChh.4222$386.1086@trndny01...
> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
> .. .
>
>> Try field experimentation first. There's 15 of them in the gaggle,
>
> Is there a difference between a gaggle and an ilk?

Yup, ilk usually refers to a type of person or of a group of persons from
one location. A gaggle can refer to a bunch of cackling geese, or a herd of
animals. Both fit the members of the rah gaggle to a tee. :)



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[DABEAR]

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> And I for one don't give a flying intercourse what you agree or disagree
> with, because the facts speak for themselves. :)

You have failed to present any...

[DABEAR]

Juan Jimenez wrote:


> Unhuh. That must be why virtually none of the links work, eh? Seems to me
> like it was put on hold for you with a size 12 boot. Bull****us Interruptus,
> the call it. :)

This statement makes no sense...I did some update work in April,
traveled to Hawaii in May, returned, one of the Plaintiffs in the case
passed away ~ the one your girlfriend betrayed with all his hoopla
about fighting Civil Rights violations, then not coming through, after
he sold out to Houghton and RARA ~ and that website is on hold. No
work until I have further word from the remaining two Plaintiffs that
the case is underway again. There were materials on one of the
Plaintiffs computers and the security codes needed to be located and a
major case was about to be presented to the Federal government.

These are the facts. The website will be completed when the remaining
Plaintiffs are ready to do battle again. And your girlfriend Jimbo is
going to pay for her crimes. We're very patient here. We have all the
time in the World, and Time Limits for Court are outstanding.

Instead of researching and obtaining these facts, you ~ Noble
Journalist, much like your boss ~ offer "size 12 boot" and "Bull****us
Interruptus."

>From a "Noble Journalist," BTW, who claims to be a $1000.00 an hour
teacher who travels throughout the World teaching...? What!? Ethics?


> No problem, I'm sure you'll get a kick about being appointed the RAH Mascot.
> We've even got a photograph of you already to suit your new job! :)
>
> http://www.bd5.com/images/rah_gaggle_mascot.jpg
>
> Hell, even the angle of the pic is perfect for ya. :)

ROTFLMAO!!!

Great pic! That's the funniest damned picture I've seen of myself in
nearly thirty years!

Unfortunately, the theme plagarizes...again! Nothing original other
than you can morph images? At 1000.00 an hour I suppose?

Well, no sweat off my sack. It is a funny picture! <G>

Christ, that's a helluva monetary investment you just made in me!
Thanks!

[DABEAR]

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> "DABEAR" > wrote in message
> oups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
> Repetitive???? HAHAHAHA!!!! All we have to do to discern the meaning of
> "repetitive" is take a look at your prepubescent websites! :)

Reptitive...as in using the word prepubescent too many times becoming
"prepubescent" in style.


> > That's funny: the "Pig Trough Trapdoor!" Did your momma give your
> > mouth that foul name?
>
> Yup, she made it just for you, nimrod. :)


I don't know, the damned thing sounds so BIG that it had to have been
made for you so that Jim Campbell could use it.




> And we're stiiiiilllll waiting for the slightest inkling of aviation
> experience (other than standing next to Panavia Tornado's with a dip****
> look on your face). LOL! :)


Who's "We!?" Are you schizophrenic too? My experience is already up
at my sites. I want to see if you know how to read, and also, for
decades, people have been demanding for you and Jim to put up or shut
up.

And you have not come through! If you did, people would find out what
flakes you are, wouldn't they, so that's you and Jim, always about
putting the burden that's on your shoulders onto the other guy so as to
distract attention from yourselves. So as to avoid "The Bad Light."

So ladies first...get your information up there and out there, the both
of you. Further, get the Aviation Experience of the entire ANN Staff
up there and out there. Set the example. Lead by example. That's
what they taught me in the Army.

That and wiping my ass with twigs like you.

Plagiarize that...LOL!!!

[DABEAR]

anon wrote:
> I think the RRL would like to hear from us.
>
> Maybe, I'll hear from Campbell again, like after I gave an overseas magazine
> the heads-up on Zoom after he was announced as a columnist.
>
> Jim, why don't you call me on a Sunday, like you did before, while I was
> visiting my dying grandmother.
>
> Ace

I agree...and whether they do or not, they should be totally flooded
with messages until they answer. So should their sponsors in
particular! THAT's what Campbell needs to avoid at all costs, or
they'll cut off the money umbillical and leave him marooned in limbo.

For him to be this quiet, you've got to know that you're having an
impact.

Turn up the heat!

[Al G[_1_]]

"Al G" > wrote in message
...
>
> "ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
> ...
>> In article >, Al G says...
>>>
>>>
>>>"John Ousterhout" > wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:fbhhh.274084$FQ1.4251@attbi_s71...
>>>> Al G wrote:
>>>>> I got an email from Zoom yesterday. Beyond the usual stuff:
>>>>> threats,
>>>>> get a lawyer,

snip

>
> While it is not my MO to go stomping around in mine fields, I did
> contact
> Col. Rick Searfoss, Chief Pilot and Spokesperson, with a synopsis of the
> situation.
>
> Al G
>

I hate to respond to my own post, but I didn't think some of the others
desrerved a reply so...

I heard back from Rick Searfoss rather promptly. He evidently works for
XCOR Aerospace, and RRL is their client. He isn't paid by/Doesn't speak
for/represent in any way, etc.

I don't blame him, this is looking more and more like a Tarbaby.

I did get a reassuring note from Sandy Davenport, RRL Director of
Communications:


Thank you for your concern and alerting us to possible inaccuracies. We are
looking into it and will update the bio if the questionable items cannot be
verified.

Sandy Davenport

Director of Communications

Rocket Racing League

1120 Commerce Dr. Suite B

Las Cruces, NM 88011


Mailing Address:

P O Box 16377

Las Cruces, NM 88004-6377



505-532-1543 Office

505-639-0728 Cell

505-532-1643 Fax


www.rocketracingleague.com

[ChuckSlusarczyk]

In article om>, DABEAR
says...
>
>
>Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>> This is just too easy. Like taking candy from a yapping chihuahua. <chuckle>
>>
>> We're still waiting for your "aviation experience," putz!
>
>
>Juan, that entry was made one year ago. Have you flown it yet? Do you
>have pictures of you and it at the same time ~ you in the cockpit ~ in
>flight?
>
>Simple question...just like Jimbo's medical can be revoked, so too, can
>an airworthiness certificate.
>
>Again, we have you plagiarizing on the yapping chihuahua bit. Have you
>nothing original to contribute?

Hey Bear one time jaun said I didn't own my truck ,I posted my titles with my
name on them .He still didn't believe it. That's the way I look at his
Airworthiness post could be forged or a phony. I give his proof the same
credience he gave mine same with josie .Ah lets see there was a Olympic boxer in
Poland named Slusarczyk .He ah ,was my brother yeah ,that's it he was my
brother and ah we had the same last name and.....
Credibility it was always about credibility and zoom and juan still don't have
any.


Chuck S RAH 14/1 ret

[Juan Jimenez[_1_]]

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>
>> Unhuh. That must be why virtually none of the links work, eh? Seems to me
>> like it was put on hold for you with a size 12 boot. Bull****us
>> Interruptus,
>> the call it. :)
>
> This statement makes no sense...

I don't care what makes sense to you. :)

>> No problem, I'm sure you'll get a kick about being appointed the RAH
>> Mascot.
>> We've even got a photograph of you already to suit your new job! :)
>>
>> http://www.bd5.com/images/rah_gaggle_mascot.jpg
>>
>> Hell, even the angle of the pic is perfect for ya. :)
>
> ROTFLMAO!!!
>
> Great pic! That's the funniest damned picture I've seen of myself in
> nearly thirty years!

Good to hear that. It'll be posted at strategic locations across the next
for your entertainment. :)




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[Juan Jimenez[_1_]]

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> "DABEAR" > wrote in message
>> oups.com...
>>
>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>
>> Repetitive???? HAHAHAHA!!!! All we have to do to discern the meaning of
>> "repetitive" is take a look at your prepubescent websites! :)
>
> Reptitive...as in using the word prepubescent too many times becoming
> "prepubescent" in style.

It fits you to a tee. But pick any synonyms you like, makes no difference to
me. :)

> I don't know, the damned thing sounds so BIG that it had to have been
> made for you so that Jim Campbell could use it.

Sorry to disappoint. It's got your name on it, not Jim's. :)

> Who's "We!?"

Oh, you think this is a private conversation? Confused about that too? :)

One solitary ATC license, a medical long expired, and a restriction to a
single base. Experience indeed. What did you do at the tower, official
gopher? :)



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[DABEAR]

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> One solitary ATC license, a medical long expired, and a restriction to a
> single base. Experience indeed. What did you do at the tower, official
> gopher? :)


Re: The Tower: No different than the other Veterans here on this
Newsgroup: fought the "Cold War" (which means we stood guard a lot
twenty minutes by air from the Czechoslavakian border) and helped
preserve the Freedoms that you spit on every time you attack a veteran
here or defend the criminal Jim Campbell, whom we are sworn to protect
the people from since he's referred to in our oaths as an "Enemy
Domestic." As you soon will be...all criminals and their accessories,
who are ultimately labeled criminals, are.

You are not foreign. You are American. And you are a traitor to every
veteran who has served.

Your facts are still not straight...the above information is minimal
and I worked multiple bases over eight years plus. Keep
researching...if your going to act the Journalist, try to do the
Journalist's job correctly...before you start up with more of your
lying, pudknocker, and betray yourself even further as a Faux
Journalist ~ A Fake, A Wannabe ~ lacking the morals, ethics, values and
Standards of Conduct, that are required of one.

Like Campbell, the title of a true Journalist cannot be bought. It
MUST be earned!

Also, only an indivdual attacking or betraying veterans, those who
provided their attacker's freedoms, including those veterans ~ men
and women ~ from Puerto Rico, whom I served with gladly...

....would have a "Pig's Trough Mouth," not the Veteran or Veterans who
served; not those veterans from Puerto Rico who served Honorably and
maintain their sworn oaths and honors.

Campbell didn't serve adequate time to be recognized as a Veteran, let
alone, a Vietnam Veteran. His discharge is in question ~ he needs to
produce a DD Form 214 complete with RE Code. Sans the RE Code, any 214
he would provide is suspect.

What about your service in the military, Juan? Any? Did you stand
guard on a wall as a member of the U.S. Armed Forces?

If you did, I'd sure like to know why you turned traitor. If you
didn't, no explanation to the fact that your a traitor to every veteran
here and around the World, is necessary.

You stink will speak for itself...

[DABEAR]

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> One solitary ATC license, a medical long expired, and a restriction to a
> single base. Experience indeed. What did you do at the tower, official
> gopher? :)


Re: The Tower: No different than the other Veterans here on this
Newsgroup: fought the "Cold War" (which means we stood guard a lot
twenty minutes by air from the Czechoslavakian border) and helped
preserve the Freedoms that you spit on every time you attack a veteran
here or defend the criminal Jim Campbell, whom we are sworn to protect
the people from since he's referred to in our oaths as an "Enemy
Domestic." As you soon will be...all criminals and their accessories,
who are ultimately labeled criminals, are.

You are not foreign. You are American. And you are a traitor to every
veteran who has served.

Your facts are still not straight...the above information is minimal
and I worked multiple bases over eight years plus. Keep
researching...if your going to act the Journalist, try to do the
Journalist's job correctly...before you start up with more of your
lying, pudknocker, and betray yourself even further as a Faux
Journalist ~ A Fake, A Wannabe ~ lacking the morals, ethics, values and
Standards of Conduct, that are required of one.

Like Campbell, the title of a true Journalist cannot be bought. It
MUST be earned!

Also, only an indivdual attacking or betraying veterans, those who
provided their attacker's freedoms, including those veterans ~ men
and women ~ from Puerto Rico, whom I served with gladly...

....would have a "Pig's Trough Mouth," not the Veteran or Veterans who
served; not those veterans from Puerto Rico who served Honorably and
maintain their sworn oaths and honors.

Campbell didn't serve adequate time to be recognized as a Veteran, let
alone, a Vietnam Veteran. His discharge is in question ~ he needs to
produce a DD Form 214 complete with RE Code. Sans the RE Code, any 214
he would provide is suspect.

What about your service in the military, Juan? Any? Did you stand
guard on a wall as a member of the U.S. Armed Forces?

If you did, I'd sure like to know why you turned traitor. If you
didn't, no explanation to the fact that your a traitor to every veteran
here and around the World, is necessary.

You stink will speak for itself...

[Harry K]

Al G wrote:
> "Al G" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> In article >, Al G says...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>"John Ousterhout" > wrote in
> >>>message
> >>>news:fbhhh.274084$FQ1.4251@attbi_s71...
> >>>> Al G wrote:
> >>>>> I got an email from Zoom yesterday. Beyond the usual stuff:
> >>>>> threats,
> >>>>> get a lawyer,
>
> snip
>
> >
> > While it is not my MO to go stomping around in mine fields, I did
> > contact
> > Col. Rick Searfoss, Chief Pilot and Spokesperson, with a synopsis of the
> > situation.
> >
> > Al G
> >
>
> I hate to respond to my own post, but I didn't think some of the others
> desrerved a reply so...
>
> I heard back from Rick Searfoss rather promptly. He evidently works for
> XCOR Aerospace, and RRL is their client. He isn't paid by/Doesn't speak
> for/represent in any way, etc.
>
> I don't blame him, this is looking more and more like a Tarbaby.
>
> I did get a reassuring note from Sandy Davenport, RRL Director of
> Communications:
>
>
> Thank you for your concern and alerting us to possible inaccuracies. We are
> looking into it and will update the bio if the questionable items cannot be
> verified.
>
> Sandy Davenport
>
> Director of Communications
>
> Rocket Racing League
>
> 1120 Commerce Dr. Suite B
>
> Las Cruces, NM 88011
>
>
> Mailing Address:
>
> P O Box 16377
>
> Las Cruces, NM 88004-6377
>
>
>
> 505-532-1543 Office
>
> 505-639-0728 Cell
>
> 505-532-1643 Fax
>
>
> www.rocketracingleague.com

Now _that_ should start a couple people shaking in their boots. To be
actually called on their lies by someone who can do something about it.

Harry K

[ChuckSlusarczyk]

In article om>, Harry K
says...

>> I heard back from Rick Searfoss rather promptly. He evidently works for
>> XCOR Aerospace, and RRL is their client. He isn't paid by/Doesn't speak
>> for/represent in any way, etc.
>>
>> I don't blame him, this is looking more and more like a Tarbaby.

Hi Harry
What does Col. Rick Searfoss do? I don't know the name.


>>
>> I did get a reassuring note from Sandy Davenport, RRL Director of
>> Communications:
>>
>>
>> Thank you for your concern and alerting us to possible inaccuracies. We are
>> looking into it and will update the bio if the questionable items cannot be
>> verified.
>>
>> Sandy Davenport
>>
>> Director of Communications
>>
>> Rocket Racing League
>>
>> 1120 Commerce Dr. Suite B
>>
>> Las Cruces, NM 88011
>>
>>
>> Mailing Address:
>>
>> P O Box 16377
>>
>> Las Cruces, NM 88004-6377
>>
>>
>>
>> 505-532-1543 Office
>>
>> 505-639-0728 Cell
>>
>> 505-532-1643 Fax
>>
>>
>> www.rocketracingleague.com
>
>Now _that_ should start a couple people shaking in their boots. To be
>actually called on their lies by someone who can do something about it.

Thanks for the contact information I'll definately send her something .

See ya

Chuck S

[Jerry Springer]

D
>
> What about your service in the military, Juan? Any? Did you stand
> guard on a wall as a member of the U.S. Armed Forces?
>
> If you did, I'd sure like to know why you turned traitor. If you
> didn't, no explanation to the fact that your a traitor to every veteran
> here and around the World, is necessary.
>
> You stink will speak for itself...
>

Seems like I remember a picture of him in a Marines uniform or he said
he was a Marine and he worked on aircraft.

[Dan[_2_]]

Jerry Springer wrote:
> D
>>
>> What about your service in the military, Juan? Any? Did you stand
>> guard on a wall as a member of the U.S. Armed Forces?
>>
>> If you did, I'd sure like to know why you turned traitor. If you
>> didn't, no explanation to the fact that your a traitor to every veteran
>> here and around the World, is necessary.
>>
>> You stink will speak for itself...
>>
>
> Seems like I remember a picture of him in a Marines uniform or he said
> he was a Marine and he worked on aircraft.

He has presented a picture he claims is of him and he has claimed to
have worked on aircraft.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[Al G[_1_]]

Hi Chuck,

The RRL page says that Rick is "Chief Pilot". As I understand it, his
duties are strictly aircraft testing & developement for XCOR.

AL G


"ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
...
> In article om>, Harry K
> says...
>
>>> I heard back from Rick Searfoss rather promptly. He evidently works
>>> for
>>> XCOR Aerospace, and RRL is their client. He isn't paid by/Doesn't speak
>>> for/represent in any way, etc.
>>>
>>> I don't blame him, this is looking more and more like a Tarbaby.
>
> Hi Harry
> What does Col. Rick Searfoss do? I don't know the name.
>
>
>>>
>>> I did get a reassuring note from Sandy Davenport, RRL Director of
>>> Communications:
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you for your concern and alerting us to possible inaccuracies. We
>>> are
>>> looking into it and will update the bio if the questionable items cannot
>>> be
>>> verified.
>>>
>>> Sandy Davenport
>>>
>>> Director of Communications
>>>
>>> Rocket Racing League
>>>
>>> 1120 Commerce Dr. Suite B
>>>
>>> Las Cruces, NM 88011
>>>
>>>
>>> Mailing Address:
>>>
>>> P O Box 16377
>>>
>>> Las Cruces, NM 88004-6377
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 505-532-1543 Office
>>>
>>> 505-639-0728 Cell
>>>
>>> 505-532-1643 Fax
>>>
>>>
>>> www.rocketracingleague.com
>>
>>Now _that_ should start a couple people shaking in their boots. To be
>>actually called on their lies by someone who can do something about it.
>
> Thanks for the contact information I'll definately send her something .
>
> See ya
>
> Chuck S
>

[Al G[_1_]]

"Richard Riley" > wrote in message
...
> On 19 Dec 2006 03:59:49 -0800, ChuckSlusarczyk
> > wrote:
>
>>In article om>, Harry K
>>says...
>>
>>>> I heard back from Rick Searfoss rather promptly. He evidently works
>>>> for
>>>> XCOR Aerospace, and RRL is their client. He isn't paid by/Doesn't speak
>>>> for/represent in any way, etc.
>>>>
>>>> I don't blame him, this is looking more and more like a Tarbaby.
>>
>>Hi Harry
>>What does Col. Rick Searfoss do? I don't know the name.
>>
>
> Chief test pilot for X-COR, former astronaut, X-prize judge,
> instructor at National Test Pilot School (where Campbell "graduated").
> He's the serious pilot among the "first 4."
>
> The implications are significant.

He's also flown 56 differant types of aircraft.

Where as Eric "Winkle" Brown of the British Fleet Air Arm WW2 era,
apparently holds the "Record" @ 487.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_%22Winkle%22_Brown


AL G

[Dan[_2_]]

Al G wrote:
> "Richard Riley" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On 19 Dec 2006 03:59:49 -0800, ChuckSlusarczyk
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> In article om>, Harry K
>>> says...
>>>
>>>>> I heard back from Rick Searfoss rather promptly. He evidently works
>>>>> for
>>>>> XCOR Aerospace, and RRL is their client. He isn't paid by/Doesn't speak
>>>>> for/represent in any way, etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't blame him, this is looking more and more like a Tarbaby.
>>> Hi Harry
>>> What does Col. Rick Searfoss do? I don't know the name.
>>>
>> Chief test pilot for X-COR, former astronaut, X-prize judge,
>> instructor at National Test Pilot School (where Campbell "graduated").
>> He's the serious pilot among the "first 4."
>>
>> The implications are significant.
>
> He's also flown 56 differant types of aircraft.
>
> Where as Eric "Winkle" Brown of the British Fleet Air Arm WW2 era,
> apparently holds the "Record" @ 487.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_%22Winkle%22_Brown
>
>
> AL G
>
>
But campbell has flown over 1300 types, hasn't he?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[Al G[_1_]]

"Dan" > wrote in message
...
> Al G wrote:
>> "Richard Riley" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On 19 Dec 2006 03:59:49 -0800, ChuckSlusarczyk
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article om>,
>>>> Harry K
>>>> says...
>>>>
>>>>>> I heard back from Rick Searfoss rather promptly. He evidently
>>>>>> works for
>>>>>> XCOR Aerospace, and RRL is their client. He isn't paid by/Doesn't
>>>>>> speak
>>>>>> for/represent in any way, etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't blame him, this is looking more and more like a Tarbaby.
>>>> Hi Harry
>>>> What does Col. Rick Searfoss do? I don't know the name.
>>>>
>>> Chief test pilot for X-COR, former astronaut, X-prize judge,
>>> instructor at National Test Pilot School (where Campbell "graduated").
>>> He's the serious pilot among the "first 4."
>>>
>>> The implications are significant.
>>
>> He's also flown 56 differant types of aircraft.
>>
>> Where as Eric "Winkle" Brown of the British Fleet Air Arm WW2 era,
>> apparently holds the "Record" @ 487.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_%22Winkle%22_Brown
>>
>>
>> AL G
> But campbell has flown over 1300 types, hasn't he?
>
> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

I think his Bio says 1100, but I'll let someone else tilt at that windmill.

I've read Ron Wanttaja's "Guide for the Zoomed", and I'm in the "Pop white
smoke and dive
for the bunker" mode. I had the range, fired for effect, and I'm still
waiting out the secondaries.
I think I'll wait till he stops to reload before sticking my head up.

Al G

[Wayne Paul]

"Dan" > wrote in message
...
> Al G wrote:
>> "Richard Riley" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Chief test pilot for X-COR, former astronaut, X-prize judge,
>>> instructor at National Test Pilot School (where Campbell "graduated").
>>> He's the serious pilot among the "first 4."
>>>
>>> The implications are significant.
>>
>> He's also flown 56 differant types of aircraft.
>>
>> Where as Eric "Winkle" Brown of the British Fleet Air Arm WW2 era,
>> apparently holds the "Record" @ 487.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_%22Winkle%22_Brown
>>
>>
>> AL G
> But campbell has flown over 1300 types, hasn't he?
>

In the Richard Schreder biography "10,000 feet & Climbing" it stated the
Dick flew over 750 different models. (page 23). The biography posted on the
web states he accumulated 15,500 hous of flight time.
(http://www.soaridaho.com/Schreder/Schreder/Richard_Schreder_Biography.html)

"10,000 feet & Climbing" was written by his daugher. The 750 different
models seems high, she may have ment 750 different aircraft.

Wayne
HP-14 "6F"
http://www.soaridaho.com

[Dan[_2_]]

Al G wrote:
> "Dan" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Al G wrote:
>>> "Richard Riley" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On 19 Dec 2006 03:59:49 -0800, ChuckSlusarczyk
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article om>,
>>>>> Harry K
>>>>> says...
>>>>>
>>>>>>> I heard back from Rick Searfoss rather promptly. He evidently
>>>>>>> works for
>>>>>>> XCOR Aerospace, and RRL is their client. He isn't paid by/Doesn't
>>>>>>> speak
>>>>>>> for/represent in any way, etc.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't blame him, this is looking more and more like a Tarbaby.
>>>>> Hi Harry
>>>>> What does Col. Rick Searfoss do? I don't know the name.
>>>>>
>>>> Chief test pilot for X-COR, former astronaut, X-prize judge,
>>>> instructor at National Test Pilot School (where Campbell "graduated").
>>>> He's the serious pilot among the "first 4."
>>>>
>>>> The implications are significant.
>>> He's also flown 56 differant types of aircraft.
>>>
>>> Where as Eric "Winkle" Brown of the British Fleet Air Arm WW2 era,
>>> apparently holds the "Record" @ 487.
>>>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_%22Winkle%22_Brown
>>>
>>>
>>> AL G
>> But campbell has flown over 1300 types, hasn't he?
>>
>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>
> I think his Bio says 1100, but I'll let someone else tilt at that windmill.
>
> I've read Ron Wanttaja's "Guide for the Zoomed", and I'm in the "Pop white
> smoke and dive
> for the bunker" mode. I had the range, fired for effect, and I'm still
> waiting out the secondaries.
> I think I'll wait till he stops to reload before sticking my head up.
>
> Al G
>
>

Forget the white smoke, that's for concealment. The LZ is red smoke.
"I identify purple" "screw that purple, that's lavender" "I don't care
what you call it get yer ass and report to commo bunker."

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[DABEAR]

Juan Jimenez wrote:

>
> Good to hear that. It'll be posted at strategic locations across the next
> for your entertainment. :)

Sure, just make sure you got a model release and a payment agreement
and we'll go from there...

....absent my signature and a payment arrangement that's to my
satisfaction and you pay through the nose, as does anyone who publishes
it.

The photo you utilized is not your copyright and it's not associated
with news nor Editorial.

Damn! You'd think a Journalist would know that!

[DABEAR]

Jerry Springer wrote:


> Seems like I remember a picture of him in a Marines uniform or he said
> he was a Marine and he worked on aircraft.

Seeing is believing...have you seen him in person to contrast the face
with the photo? And do you remember where you saw the photo? I'd like
a look myself...

That would be quite the shock for the Marines ~ "Conduct Unbecoming A
Marine," with Juan defending a guy claiming to be a Vietnam Veteran who
isn't, and for that matter, wasn't wounded in action.

We're working on that story right now....so if I can confirm the photo
sighting of Juan in a Marine uniform, I can take that to the Marines
and see what they have to say.

Thanks for the info! It's a lead...

[DABEAR]

Dan wrote:


> He has presented a picture he claims is of him and he has claimed to
> have worked on aircraft.


Hey, Dan...was it posted on usenet? I'd like to get a copy of that
shot...thanks!

[DABEAR]

anon wrote:


> Jim, why don't you call me on a Sunday, like you did before, while I was
> visiting my dying grandmother.
>
> Ace

If or when you feel up to it, I'd like to hear your story...



This is a published e-mail so don't anyone worry about my posting
it...don't mean nothing to me.

[DABEAR]

DABEAR wrote:

On this page there's a photo entitled "Overwatch" about half way down
the page, with U.S. Army Spec 4 Juan Jimenez credited with the shot:

http://www.defenselink.mil/transformation/images/photos/photo_archive/index_2005-10.html

Coincidence? Hmmm...

[DABEAR]

DABEAR wrote:


> > He has presented a picture he claims is of him and he has claimed to
> > have worked on aircraft.

Well, how about ANN's picture and bio of him...and if you think the RRL
bio for Campbell is bad, just check out the same page for what he wrote
about himself in his own bio at ANN as well...but here's Juan's porky
face. Clearly his airplane hasn't flown because he can't fit in it!

http://www.aero-news.net/Community/DiscussTopic.cfm?ContentBlockID=4d02d674-a704-4c64-992c-cd6c1512e817#

Check out that Tux...cumberbund probably already snapped and took out
someone's eye...or severed their head from their neck.

Man, this guy's talking crap about my pics? I remember a line from a
while back about someone shaving a dog's ass and making it walk
backward...

....well, here living proof that it can be done. In a Tux no less...

However, I don't see the Marines taking this guy...despite what's in
his bio.

[red12049[_1_]]

Bear,

Go here for the pic you want....

http://www.bd5.com/bd00002.htm


"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ps.com...
>
> Jerry Springer wrote:
>
>
>> Seems like I remember a picture of him in a Marines uniform or he said
>> he was a Marine and he worked on aircraft.
>
> Seeing is believing...have you seen him in person to contrast the face
> with the photo? And do you remember where you saw the photo? I'd like
> a look myself...
>
> That would be quite the shock for the Marines ~ "Conduct Unbecoming A
> Marine," with Juan defending a guy claiming to be a Vietnam Veteran who
> isn't, and for that matter, wasn't wounded in action.
>
> We're working on that story right now....so if I can confirm the photo
> sighting of Juan in a Marine uniform, I can take that to the Marines
> and see what they have to say.
>
> Thanks for the info! It's a lead...
>

[DABEAR]

DABEAR wrote:
> DABEAR wrote:


Hey, what are the odds that this is him!? LOL!!!

http://www.bd5.com/bd00002.htm

Too easy to find...

Now we all know what he looks like...I'll leave it at that!

Marine Corps ~ We got to talk...

"Conduct Unbecoming A Marine!" It's a lifetime thing...Espirit de
Corps, and all.

[Anthony W]

DABEAR wrote:
> DABEAR wrote:
>
> On this page there's a photo entitled "Overwatch" about half way down
> the page, with U.S. Army Spec 4 Juan Jimenez credited with the shot:
>
> http://www.defenselink.mil/transformation/images/photos/photo_archive/index_2005-10.html
>
> Coincidence? Hmmm...



Probably, it's a common name (in some areas...)

Tony

[DABEAR]

DABEAR wrote:
> DABEAR wrote:


Hey, what are the odds that this is him!? LOL!!!

http://www.bd5.com/bd00002.htm

Too easy to find...

Now we all know what he looks like...I'll leave it at that!

Marine Corps ~ We got to talk...

"Conduct Unbecoming A Marine!" It's a lifetime thing...Espirit de
Corps, and all.

[DABEAR]

red12049 wrote:

> Bear,
>
> Go here for the pic you want....
>
> http://www.bd5.com/bd00002.htm


Thanks! Found it at about the time you were writing. His ass don't
belong to Campbell anymore. It's going to belong to the Marines!
Again! HA!

What a traitor p-rick! A Marine supporting a liar claiming to be a
Purple Heart Veteran who never stepped foot in Vietnam. All for his
own personal gain and profit!

How sick! How pathetic!

Thanks again, Red! I've got some Marine friends that will be
interested in this...

[Dan[_2_]]

DABEAR wrote:
> Dan wrote:
>
>
>> He has presented a picture he claims is of him and he has claimed to
>> have worked on aircraft.
>
>
> Hey, Dan...was it posted on usenet? I'd like to get a copy of that
> shot...thanks!
>
Yawn had a link to it, if memory serves. It's been awhile. Even if it is
a picture of a Marine named Jaun Jiminez it's may be someone else, it's
a fairly common name.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[DABEAR]

Anthony W wrote:

> Probably, it's a common name (in some areas...)
>
> Tony

Yeah, it was a coincidence...found him! Got everything I need...

[ChuckSlusarczyk]

In article m>, DABEAR says...
>
>
>Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>>
>> Good to hear that. It'll be posted at strategic locations across the next
>> for your entertainment. :)
>
>Sure, just make sure you got a model release and a payment agreement
>and we'll go from there...
>
>...absent my signature and a payment arrangement that's to my
>satisfaction and you pay through the nose, as does anyone who publishes
>it.
>
>The photo you utilized is not your copyright and it's not associated
>with news nor Editorial.
>
>Damn! You'd think a Journalist would know that!

A "real" Journalist would...so you just have to consider the source... :-)


Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret
>

[Ron Wanttaja]

Holy smoke... 87 hours without power, another 24 before Comcast comes back
online, and there's just a *few* new postings on RAH since my last visit.

Didn't read much closely, but let me chime in a bit on a couple of things.

Let me address some of the stuff that came up as I scanned the postings.

1. "Govern yourself accordingly": I saw a comment that Zoom had learned this
phrase from one of his recent court cases. Not true...This has been one of the
Zoomer's perennials; one he's used for decades. It was used AT him by the
Federal judge in his first lawsuit against Sun-N-Fun:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE COURT (i.e. The Honorable Richard A. Lazzara, Unites States District Judge):
Excuse me, excuse me, he asks the questions --

THE WITNESS (i.e., James R. Campbell): I do know Mr. Jones.

THE COURT: Excuse me, I'm not through yet.

THE WITNESS: Oh, I apologize.

THE COURT: He asks the questions, you give an answer. Do not editorialize, do
not characterize.

THE WITNESS: Oops. It's my job. Sorry, sir.

THE COURT: You know, Mr. Campbell, maybe it hasn't dawned on you, but you're in
a Federal Courtroom now.

THE WITNESS: Yes, sir, I understand that.

THE COURT: Okay, and you're going to conduct yourself accordingly.

THE WITNESS: Yes, sir.

THE COURT: All right?

THE WITNESS: Okay.

THE COURT: I don't want anymore flippant remarks like that.

---Transcript, Case# 99-799-Civ-T-26C, 8 April 1999
----------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Zoom's holding a license/medical. As others posted, the FAA pulled his
medical in the early '80s. Zoom did get it back, in about 1984. It was listed
in the FAA pilot database in the late '90s. At one point the FAA gave pilots
the option of not having their data included in the public release of the
databases. Zoom was not listed in the next release.

The aircraft registration database still shows an amateur-built aircraft
registered to the Zoomer.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. Zoom's discharge from the Air Force: I happen to believe that Zoom's
military service ended with an honorable discharge.

Why? 'Cause the Zoomer says so.

Fear not... t'was Helena, Montana that froze over last night, not the infernal
regions. I've got a perfectly rational explanation why I believe Campbell in
this case: Because it was the only POSITIVE thing he could say about himself at
the time.

To understand the circumstances, let's step back to that courtroom in New York
City twenty-seven years ago. Jim Campbell is being questioned, under oath,
about his military service:
-------------------------------------------------------------
Q. And where were you stationed?
A. First in San Antonio, Texas, for basic training. Upon completion of basic
training, to the Lowry Air Force Base, Colorado.
Q. And you were only in the service for approximately six or eight months?
A. There was a period of time before that -- it was called "inactive." That was
from October of '74, early in my senior year of high school with the United
States Army National Guard, 3rd/104 Armed CAB, that was at the time -- they've
since been reassigned. I made a switch from Army to Air Force in June of that
year. I didn't go until November. I was trying rather hard, and in -fact even
succeeded in getting a nomination to one of the service academies, which was the
reason for the period of time with the military. That attempt was unsuccessful
Q. And Mr. Campbell, you were terminated from the armed services. What was the
reason for that?
A. It was an honorable discharge.

--- NTSB SE-4661
--------------------------------------------------------------
Note the classic evasion: "Why were you terminated?" Zoom doesn't answer the
*why*, he just says he received a discharge... after just eight months of
service. If he'd been RIF'd...why not say so? Obviously, what brought about
the discharge is not something Zoom wanted to talk about.

I was suspicious about the claim to an honorable discharge, too...until I asked
a buddy who has been an Army company commander.

The upshot is that an honorable discharge is the *easiest* way to get rid of
someone you don't want. Endless paperwork on any of the others, and the danger
that the person will come back with a lawyer and sue. If you've got someone you
DON'T want, the quickest solution is to give them an honorable discharge. Every
other type involves yards of paperwork, in comparison.

In any case, I don't think even Zoom would have dared to lie, in that situation.
It was very likely that the government's attorney had obtained a copy of his
discharge paperwork, as part of the investigation.

4. Someone commented about Zoom seeming to be worse right now. If so, there's a
very good reason for it...one I recall mentioning to a fellow RAH-15'er a couple
of months back. Told ya so. :-)

Ron Wanttaja

[Montblack]

("Ron Wanttaja" wrote)
> 1. "Govern yourself accordingly": I saw a comment that Zoom had learned
> this
> phrase from one of his recent court cases. Not true...This has been one
> of the
> Zoomer's perennials; one he's used for decades. It was used AT him by
> the
> Federal judge in his first lawsuit against Sun-N-Fun:
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> THE COURT (i.e. The Honorable Richard A. Lazzara, Unites States District
> Judge):
> Excuse me, excuse me, he asks the questions --
>
> THE WITNESS (i.e., James R. Campbell): I do know Mr. Jones.
>
> THE COURT: Excuse me, I'm not through yet.
>
> THE WITNESS: Oh, I apologize.
>
> THE COURT: He asks the questions, you give an answer. Do not editorialize,
> do
> not characterize.
>
> THE WITNESS: Oops. It's my job. Sorry, sir.
>
> THE COURT: You know, Mr. Campbell, maybe it hasn't dawned on you, but
> you're in
> a Federal Courtroom now.
>
> THE WITNESS: Yes, sir, I understand that.
>
> THE COURT: Okay, and you're going to conduct yourself accordingly.
>
> THE WITNESS: Yes, sir.
>
> THE COURT: All right?
>
> THE WITNESS: Okay.
>
> THE COURT: I don't want anymore flippant remarks like that.
>
> ---Transcript, Case# 99-799-Civ-T-26C, 8 April 1999
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------


I found no issue with 'this' answer. I thought the remark was lucid ...and
funny - not forcibly clever, or flippant.

(From the web)
Lucid:
1. rational, and mentally clear, especially only for a period between
episodes of delirium or psychosis


Montblack
"forcibly clever" ...??

[Juan Jimenez[_1_]]

"Harry K" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Now _that_ should start a couple people shaking in their boots. To be
> actually called on their lies by someone who can do something about it.

That would explain the rumbling near your chair. :)



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[Juan Jimenez[_1_]]

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Re: The Tower: No different than the other Veterans here on this
> Newsgroup: fought the "Cold War" (which means we stood guard a lot
> twenty minutes by air from the Czechoslavakian border) and helped
> preserve the Freedoms that you spit on every time you attack a veteran
> here or defend the criminal Jim Campbell, whom we are sworn to protect
> the people from since he's referred to in our oaths as an "Enemy
> Domestic." As you soon will be...all criminals and their accessories,
> who are ultimately labeled criminals, are.

Sorry to burst your bubble yet again, I served. Not Air Force In A Box.
Marines. On the ramp and in the air.

> You are not foreign. You are American. And you are a traitor to every
> veteran who has served.

And you're a dip**** who's an expert at exactly two things: running at the
mouth and talking about everything you know jack **** about, sonny. :)

> Your facts are still not straight...the above information is minimal

Who cares. You run like a hooker away from cops when you are told to post
your aviation experience. Put up or shut the **** up. Simple as that.

<mercy snip, yet again...>



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[Juan Jimenez[_1_]]

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Dan wrote:
>
>
>> He has presented a picture he claims is of him and he has claimed to
>> have worked on aircraft.
>
>
> Hey, Dan...was it posted on usenet? I'd like to get a copy of that
> shot...thanks!

It's not on Usenet, putz. It's on my web site. Parris Island, 1978, platoon
2061. 2nd MAW, 1978-1982.

So when are you going to stop tucking your tail and post your aviation
experience, coward? :)



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[Juan Jimenez[_1_]]

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Now we all know what he looks like...I'll leave it at that!

Good idea, considering I look better than you can ever hope to look. :)




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[Juan Jimenez[_1_]]

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ps.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>>
>> Good to hear that. It'll be posted at strategic locations across the next
>> for your entertainment. :)
>
> Sure, just make sure you got a model release and a payment agreement
> and we'll go from there...

Start begging. :)




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[DABEAR]

<snipped> It may be that Zoom was anticipating using the
> Powrachute judgement to fund his legal expenses in these trials. Alternately,
> it may be that Zoom's attorney didn't want to be working on these cases with the
> SnF depositions coming up.
>
> Ron Wanttaja

Ron, I have irrefutable evidence that Zoom committed Federal Perjury
against me. I notice that you have a letter submitted to the Court.

Is it possible for me to submit evidence in regards to Zoom's failure
to uphold a sworn oath not to lie? Even a letter to the Court?

[Ron Wanttaja]

On 21 Dec 2006 01:47:15 -0800, "DABEAR" > wrote:

>
><snipped> It may be that Zoom was anticipating using the
>> Powrachute judgement to fund his legal expenses in these trials. Alternately,
>> it may be that Zoom's attorney didn't want to be working on these cases with the
>> SnF depositions coming up.
>
>Ron, I have irrefutable evidence that Zoom committed Federal Perjury
>against me. I notice that you have a letter submitted to the Court.
>
>Is it possible for me to submit evidence in regards to Zoom's failure
>to uphold a sworn oath not to lie? Even a letter to the Court?

I'm not a lawyer, but I figure a mere accusation of perjury in an unrelated case
would be of no help. Irrefutable evidence or not, I would guess that it's not
really applicable unless there's been an actual court ruling that he perjured
himself.

Zoom was sued for fraud and perjury in his bankruptcy and settled out-of-court
on a promise to pay about $50,000. I'm sure SnF is aware of this, at least.

Ron Wanttaja

[BobR]

I sure would like to see a count of the number of his former
"Advertisers" that he has filed suit against. The list has to be
getting close to a record for any publication. Hell, he might even
have another world record to list on his BIO. Add in the ex-employees,
ex-lawyers, RAH participants and the list grows to be very impressive
in a sick sort of way. That would be a great list to post for the
potiential advertisers to see wouldn't it?


Ron Wanttaja wrote:
> On 21 Dec 2006 01:47:15 -0800, "DABEAR" > wrote:
>
> >
> ><snipped> It may be that Zoom was anticipating using the
> >> Powrachute judgement to fund his legal expenses in these trials. Alternately,
> >> it may be that Zoom's attorney didn't want to be working on these cases with the
> >> SnF depositions coming up.
> >
> >Ron, I have irrefutable evidence that Zoom committed Federal Perjury
> >against me. I notice that you have a letter submitted to the Court.
> >
> >Is it possible for me to submit evidence in regards to Zoom's failure
> >to uphold a sworn oath not to lie? Even a letter to the Court?
>
> I'm not a lawyer, but I figure a mere accusation of perjury in an unrelated case
> would be of no help. Irrefutable evidence or not, I would guess that it's not
> really applicable unless there's been an actual court ruling that he perjured
> himself.
>
> Zoom was sued for fraud and perjury in his bankruptcy and settled out-of-court
> on a promise to pay about $50,000. I'm sure SnF is aware of this, at least.
>
> Ron Wanttaja

[Al G[_1_]]

"Dan" > wrote in message
...
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> "DABEAR" > wrote in message
>> ups.com...
>>> Yawn wrote:
> .
>>>
>> Tell you one thing, though, you need to do something about those pictures
>> of yourself you put on all those websites you have "under construction."
>> For one thing, your posture sucks and you look like an idiot in a flight
>> jacket and an unshaved face. Tom Cruise you're not, bubba. For another
>> thing, you need to understand that creating a ****load of websites using
>> the same braindead, ugly template and claiming you're the news service
>> for half the world doesn't mean squat in real time. :)
>
> Better watch out, big guy, I think yawn is lusting after you.
>
> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired


I found one! See "Juan reports for duty" @ alt.binaries.pictures.aviation

Al G

[Al G[_1_]]

"Al G" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Dan" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>> "DABEAR" > wrote in message
>>> ups.com...
>>>> Yawn wrote:
>> .
>>>>
>>> Tell you one thing, though, you need to do something about those
>>> pictures of yourself you put on all those websites you have "under
>>> construction." For one thing, your posture sucks and you look like an
>>> idiot in a flight jacket and an unshaved face. Tom Cruise you're not,
>>> bubba. For another thing, you need to understand that creating a
>>> ****load of websites using the same braindead, ugly template and
>>> claiming you're the news service for half the world doesn't mean squat
>>> in real time. :)
>>
>> Better watch out, big guy, I think yawn is lusting after you.
>>
>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>
>
> I found one! See "Juan reports for duty" @ alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
>
> Al G
>
The binary group filter, "rejected" my photo. How smart is the filter? Was
it "Juan" that set it off? I'll keep trying.

Al G

[DABEAR]

Ron Wanttaja wrote:

> Zoom was sued for fraud and perjury in his bankruptcy and settled out-of-court
> on a promise to pay about $50,000. I'm sure SnF is aware of this, at least.
>
> Ron Wanttaja

Thanks for this information...when I get a conviction, we can alert the
other Courts plus the applicable Lawyers opposed to Zoom and see if
they want to pursue anything further.

In the meantime, do you have any information on that case, and beyond
the three that you noted in Polk County, do you have any listings of
additional cases and/or any documentation related to cases he's been
involved in, particularly where he's a Defendatn.

Thanks! BRDB!!! (= Best Regards DA BEAR!!!)

[DABEAR]

BobR wrote:
> I sure would like to see a count of the number of his former
> "Advertisers" that he has filed suit against. The list has to be
> getting close to a record for any publication. Hell, he might even
> have another world record to list on his BIO. Add in the ex-employees,
> ex-lawyers, RAH participants and the list grows to be very impressive
> in a sick sort of way. That would be a great list to post for the
> potiential advertisers to see wouldn't it?


I thoroughly agree...get all his false charges together into one group,
publish them on the internet in one or more spots, but collectively,
then send links out so that folks can protect themselves against him.

[Harry K]

DABEAR wrote:
> Ron Wanttaja wrote:
>
> > Zoom was sued for fraud and perjury in his bankruptcy and settled out-of-court
> > on a promise to pay about $50,000. I'm sure SnF is aware of this, at least.
> >
> > Ron Wanttaja
>
> Thanks for this information...when I get a conviction, we can alert the
> other Courts plus the applicable Lawyers opposed to Zoom and see if
> they want to pursue anything further.
>
> In the meantime, do you have any information on that case, and beyond
> the three that you noted in Polk County, do you have any listings of
> additional cases and/or any documentation related to cases he's been
> involved in, particularly where he's a Defendatn.
>
> Thanks! BRDB!!! (= Best Regards DA BEAR!!!)

This is way off topic right now but..

I find it suspicious that Juan dissappeared the instant you began talk
of _his_ credentials and spoke of going to the Marines about it. A bit
early to be certain yet but it looks like he may have left a trail of
dust. Only been about 24 hours.

Harry K

[Ron Wanttaja]

On 21 Dec 2006 08:04:28 -0800, "BobR" > wrote:

>I sure would like to see a count of the number of his former
>"Advertisers" that he has filed suit against. The list has to be
>getting close to a record for any publication. Hell, he might even
>have another world record to list on his BIO. Add in the ex-employees,
>ex-lawyers, RAH participants and the list grows to be very impressive
>in a sick sort of way. That would be a great list to post for the
>potiential advertisers to see wouldn't it?

One has but to ask. Here's the lawsuits Zoom or his companies have filed. For
brevity, I've shortened down the Plaintiff name to the first on the list.

AIREDALE PRESS INC VS.BRADY R B JACOB COY
Polk Co. Case: 1994CA-001680-0000-00
Result: Dismissed due to lack of prosecution 1994
[Coy Jacob has an aircraft modification company, don't know if they advertised
or not]

AIREDALE PRESS INC vs. KROPP ENTER INC
Polk Co. Case: 1993SC-000016-0000-WH
Result: Apparent out-of-court settlement 1/8/1993
[Aviation supply company, don't know if they advertised]

AIREDALE PRESS INC vs. BOTTOM LINE SALES
Polk Co. Case:1993SC-000017-0000-WH
Result: Dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction 1/8/1993
[Don't know anything about this company]

AIREDALE PRESS INC vs. AIRCRAFT REFINISHING SYST INC
Polk Co. Case: 1993SC-000018-0000-WH
Result: Apparent out-of-court settlement 1/8/1993
[Don't know if they advertised]

AIREDALE PRESS INC vs. HITLAW FRANK
Highlands Co. Case: 93000102GCS
Result: Dismissed due to lack of Prosecution 3/30/1993

AIREDALE PRESS INC vs. COOKE KENNETH
Polk Co. Case: 1993CA-000727-0000-00
Result: Dismissed due to lack of prosecution 3/31/1993
[Cooke was a former editor]

AIREDALE PRESS INC vs. FLIGHTWORKS CORP & RAMEY LAUREL
Polk Co. Case: 1993CA-002605-0000-00
Result: Out of court settlement 11/18/1993
[Ramey was another former editor, and Campbell's former fiance. Flightworks was
a former advertiser]

JAMES CAMPBELL VS. VERNON BARR, DANIEL GRUNLOH, DAVID HYDE, RICHARD ILFELD,
HAPPY MILES, JOHN OUSTERHOUT, WILLIAM PHILLIPS, CHARLIE PORTER, ANTHONY PUCILLO,
RICHARD RILEY, BILL ROBIE, CHUCK SLUSZARCYK, ALAN STAATS, WALT TROYER, RONALD
WANTTAJA (hey, that's me! :-)
Palm Beach Case: CL 97 006570 AJ (Countersuit in Tony Pucillo's Fraud, RICO,
Libel, etc. Lawsuit against Campbell.
Result: Only ~half the counter-defendants served, most of the rest were
dismissed due to improper service, one counter-defendant deceased, and the final
counder-defendant dismissed due to lack of prosecution.
[Man, it's getting tough to remember. Counter defendants included a former
editor, a former writer, a former employee, and two former advertisers.]

AERO-MEDIA USA INC vs. SUN N FUN
Case: 1999CA-001171-0000-00
Result: Campbell Lost 4/1/1999
[Former advertiser]

AERO-NEWS NETWORK INC vs. PULSAR AIRCRAFT CORP
Case: 2002SC-000241-0000-WH
Result: Campbell Lost. 4/11/2002
[Advertiser]

AERO-NEWS NETWORK INC vs. ROTARY AIR FORCE
Case: 2002SC-000241-0000-WH
Result: Out of court settlement 4/12/2002
[Advertiser]

CAMPBELL JAMES vs. SUN N FUN FLY-IN INC AND DOTHAN SECURITY
Case: 2003CA-002626-0000-WH
Result: Dothan dismissed in 2005, otherwise still ongoing
[SnF, again, was a former advertiser]

AERO-NEWS NETWORK INC vs. POWRACHUTE CORPORATION
Case: 2005CA-001448-0000-LK
Result: Default Settlement for Plaintiff 4/15/2005
[Advertiser]

AERO-NEWS NETWORK INC vs. CONTROLVISION CORPORATION
Case: 2005CA-001449-0000-LK
Result: Ongoing
[Advertiser]

AERO-NEWS NETWORK INC vs. LIBERTY AEROSPACE INC.
Case: 2005CC-001882-0000-LK
Result: Ongoing
[Advertiser]

These are just the cases I've found on the Polk County web page, plus the Hitlaw
case (which Frank posted about a while back) and, of course, the RAH-15 case.
Out of the fifteen, he's won one by default and achieved an out-of-court
settlement in four. In one of the out-of-court settlements (Flightworks) he
claimed that the settlement didn't even cover his court costs.

Ron Wanttaja

[BobR]

What a pathetic abuse of our court system. I suspect there are more
that we don't know about.


Ron Wanttaja wrote:
> On 21 Dec 2006 08:04:28 -0800, "BobR" > wrote:
>
> >I sure would like to see a count of the number of his former
> >"Advertisers" that he has filed suit against. The list has to be
> >getting close to a record for any publication. Hell, he might even
> >have another world record to list on his BIO. Add in the ex-employees,
> >ex-lawyers, RAH participants and the list grows to be very impressive
> >in a sick sort of way. That would be a great list to post for the
> >potiential advertisers to see wouldn't it?
>
> One has but to ask. Here's the lawsuits Zoom or his companies have filed. For
> brevity, I've shortened down the Plaintiff name to the first on the list.
>
> AIREDALE PRESS INC VS.BRADY R B JACOB COY
> Polk Co. Case: 1994CA-001680-0000-00
> Result: Dismissed due to lack of prosecution 1994
> [Coy Jacob has an aircraft modification company, don't know if they advertised
> or not]
>
> AIREDALE PRESS INC vs. KROPP ENTER INC
> Polk Co. Case: 1993SC-000016-0000-WH
> Result: Apparent out-of-court settlement 1/8/1993
> [Aviation supply company, don't know if they advertised]
>
> AIREDALE PRESS INC vs. BOTTOM LINE SALES
> Polk Co. Case:1993SC-000017-0000-WH
> Result: Dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction 1/8/1993
> [Don't know anything about this company]
>
> AIREDALE PRESS INC vs. AIRCRAFT REFINISHING SYST INC
> Polk Co. Case: 1993SC-000018-0000-WH
> Result: Apparent out-of-court settlement 1/8/1993
> [Don't know if they advertised]
>
> AIREDALE PRESS INC vs. HITLAW FRANK
> Highlands Co. Case: 93000102GCS
> Result: Dismissed due to lack of Prosecution 3/30/1993
>
> AIREDALE PRESS INC vs. COOKE KENNETH
> Polk Co. Case: 1993CA-000727-0000-00
> Result: Dismissed due to lack of prosecution 3/31/1993
> [Cooke was a former editor]
>
> AIREDALE PRESS INC vs. FLIGHTWORKS CORP & RAMEY LAUREL
> Polk Co. Case: 1993CA-002605-0000-00
> Result: Out of court settlement 11/18/1993
> [Ramey was another former editor, and Campbell's former fiance. Flightworks was
> a former advertiser]
>
> JAMES CAMPBELL VS. VERNON BARR, DANIEL GRUNLOH, DAVID HYDE, RICHARD ILFELD,
> HAPPY MILES, JOHN OUSTERHOUT, WILLIAM PHILLIPS, CHARLIE PORTER, ANTHONY PUCILLO,
> RICHARD RILEY, BILL ROBIE, CHUCK SLUSZARCYK, ALAN STAATS, WALT TROYER, RONALD
> WANTTAJA (hey, that's me! :-)
> Palm Beach Case: CL 97 006570 AJ (Countersuit in Tony Pucillo's Fraud, RICO,
> Libel, etc. Lawsuit against Campbell.
> Result: Only ~half the counter-defendants served, most of the rest were
> dismissed due to improper service, one counter-defendant deceased, and the final
> counder-defendant dismissed due to lack of prosecution.
> [Man, it's getting tough to remember. Counter defendants included a former
> editor, a former writer, a former employee, and two former advertisers.]
>
> AERO-MEDIA USA INC vs. SUN N FUN
> Case: 1999CA-001171-0000-00
> Result: Campbell Lost 4/1/1999
> [Former advertiser]
>
> AERO-NEWS NETWORK INC vs. PULSAR AIRCRAFT CORP
> Case: 2002SC-000241-0000-WH
> Result: Campbell Lost. 4/11/2002
> [Advertiser]
>
> AERO-NEWS NETWORK INC vs. ROTARY AIR FORCE
> Case: 2002SC-000241-0000-WH
> Result: Out of court settlement 4/12/2002
> [Advertiser]
>
> CAMPBELL JAMES vs. SUN N FUN FLY-IN INC AND DOTHAN SECURITY
> Case: 2003CA-002626-0000-WH
> Result: Dothan dismissed in 2005, otherwise still ongoing
> [SnF, again, was a former advertiser]
>
> AERO-NEWS NETWORK INC vs. POWRACHUTE CORPORATION
> Case: 2005CA-001448-0000-LK
> Result: Default Settlement for Plaintiff 4/15/2005
> [Advertiser]
>
> AERO-NEWS NETWORK INC vs. CONTROLVISION CORPORATION
> Case: 2005CA-001449-0000-LK
> Result: Ongoing
> [Advertiser]
>
> AERO-NEWS NETWORK INC vs. LIBERTY AEROSPACE INC.
> Case: 2005CC-001882-0000-LK
> Result: Ongoing
> [Advertiser]
>
> These are just the cases I've found on the Polk County web page, plus the Hitlaw
> case (which Frank posted about a while back) and, of course, the RAH-15 case.
> Out of the fifteen, he's won one by default and achieved an out-of-court
> settlement in four. In one of the out-of-court settlements (Flightworks) he
> claimed that the settlement didn't even cover his court costs.
>
> Ron Wanttaja

[DABEAR]

Hanoi Juan Jimenez wrote:


> Sorry to burst your bubble yet again, I served. Not Air Force In A Box.
> Marines. On the ramp and in the air.

Oh, you didn't burst my bubble, Hanoi Juan...I found your website.
Found what a traitor you are supporting that lying poser, who claims he
was at My Lai...claims he was wounded in Vietnam...never stepped foot
in country...and here you are supporting him!

There's a price to pay for that...


> And you're a dip**** who's an expert at exactly two things: running at the
> mouth and talking about everything you know jack **** about, sonny. :)

I'm older than you, traitor boy...and I know a damn site better than
you just exactly what kind of crud you are...



> Who cares. You run like a hooker away from cops when you are told to post
> your aviation experience. Put up or shut the **** up. Simple as that.

Make me...traitor boy...simple as that.

[ChuckSlusarczyk]

In article >, Ron Wanttaja says...
>
>On 21 Dec 2006 08:04:28 -0800, "BobR" > wrote:
>
>>I sure would like to see a count of the number of his former
>>"Advertisers" that he has filed suit against. The list has to be
>>getting close to a record for any publication. Hell, he might even
>>have another world record to list on his BIO. Add in the ex-employees,
>>ex-lawyers, RAH participants and the list grows to be very impressive
>>in a sick sort of way. That would be a great list to post for the
>>potiential advertisers to see wouldn't it?
>
>One has but to ask. Here's the lawsuits Zoom or his companies have filed. For
>brevity, I've shortened down the Plaintiff name to the first on the list.
>
>AIREDALE PRESS INC VS.BRADY R B JACOB COY
>Polk Co. Case: 1994CA-001680-0000-00
>Result: Dismissed due to lack of prosecution 1994
>[Coy Jacob has an aircraft modification company, don't know if they advertised
>or not]
>
>AIREDALE PRESS INC vs. KROPP ENTER INC
>Polk Co. Case: 1993SC-000016-0000-WH
>Result: Apparent out-of-court settlement 1/8/1993
>[Aviation supply company, don't know if they advertised]
>
>AIREDALE PRESS INC vs. BOTTOM LINE SALES
>Polk Co. Case:1993SC-000017-0000-WH
>Result: Dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction 1/8/1993
>[Don't know anything about this company]
>
>AIREDALE PRESS INC vs. AIRCRAFT REFINISHING SYST INC
>Polk Co. Case: 1993SC-000018-0000-WH
>Result: Apparent out-of-court settlement 1/8/1993
>[Don't know if they advertised]
>
>AIREDALE PRESS INC vs. HITLAW FRANK
>Highlands Co. Case: 93000102GCS
>Result: Dismissed due to lack of Prosecution 3/30/1993
>
>AIREDALE PRESS INC vs. COOKE KENNETH
>Polk Co. Case: 1993CA-000727-0000-00
>Result: Dismissed due to lack of prosecution 3/31/1993
>[Cooke was a former editor]
>
>AIREDALE PRESS INC vs. FLIGHTWORKS CORP & RAMEY LAUREL
>Polk Co. Case: 1993CA-002605-0000-00
>Result: Out of court settlement 11/18/1993
>[Ramey was another former editor, and Campbell's former fiance. Flightworks was
>a former advertiser]
>
>JAMES CAMPBELL VS. VERNON BARR, DANIEL GRUNLOH, DAVID HYDE, RICHARD ILFELD,
>HAPPY MILES, JOHN OUSTERHOUT, WILLIAM PHILLIPS, CHARLIE PORTER, ANTHONY PUCILLO,
>RICHARD RILEY, BILL ROBIE, CHUCK SLUSZARCYK, ALAN STAATS, WALT TROYER, RONALD
>WANTTAJA (hey, that's me! :-)
>Palm Beach Case: CL 97 006570 AJ (Countersuit in Tony Pucillo's Fraud, RICO,
>Libel, etc. Lawsuit against Campbell.
>Result: Only ~half the counter-defendants served, most of the rest were
>dismissed due to improper service, one counter-defendant deceased, and the final
>counder-defendant dismissed due to lack of prosecution.
>[Man, it's getting tough to remember. Counter defendants included a former
>editor, a former writer, a former employee, and two former advertisers.]
>
>AERO-MEDIA USA INC vs. SUN N FUN
>Case: 1999CA-001171-0000-00
>Result: Campbell Lost 4/1/1999
>[Former advertiser]
>
>AERO-NEWS NETWORK INC vs. PULSAR AIRCRAFT CORP
>Case: 2002SC-000241-0000-WH
>Result: Campbell Lost. 4/11/2002
>[Advertiser]
>
>AERO-NEWS NETWORK INC vs. ROTARY AIR FORCE
>Case: 2002SC-000241-0000-WH
>Result: Out of court settlement 4/12/2002
>[Advertiser]
>
>CAMPBELL JAMES vs. SUN N FUN FLY-IN INC AND DOTHAN SECURITY
>Case: 2003CA-002626-0000-WH
>Result: Dothan dismissed in 2005, otherwise still ongoing
>[SnF, again, was a former advertiser]
>
>AERO-NEWS NETWORK INC vs. POWRACHUTE CORPORATION
>Case: 2005CA-001448-0000-LK
>Result: Default Settlement for Plaintiff 4/15/2005
>[Advertiser]
>
>AERO-NEWS NETWORK INC vs. CONTROLVISION CORPORATION
>Case: 2005CA-001449-0000-LK
>Result: Ongoing
>[Advertiser]
>
>AERO-NEWS NETWORK INC vs. LIBERTY AEROSPACE INC.
>Case: 2005CC-001882-0000-LK
>Result: Ongoing
>[Advertiser]
>
>These are just the cases I've found on the Polk County web page, plus the Hitlaw
>case (which Frank posted about a while back) and, of course, the RAH-15 case.
>Out of the fifteen, he's won one by default and achieved an out-of-court
>settlement in four. In one of the out-of-court settlements (Flightworks) he
>claimed that the settlement didn't even cover his court costs.

Boy I forgot some of those.What would be even more interesting would be a list
of people who he threatened to sue .That list would be quite large ,I suppose if
such a list were compiled those who claimed to have been threatened should have
some kind of proof ie internet post,e mail ,letter etc to support the
claim........Then there would be a catagory of those who were threatened
verbally but with no visible proof. Those lists would be huge and a lot of fun
to review :-)

Chuck S

[Dan[_2_]]

ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
> In article >, Ron Wanttaja says...
>> On 21 Dec 2006 08:04:28 -0800, "BobR" > wrote:
>>
>>> I sure would like to see a count of the number of his former
>>> "Advertisers" that he has filed suit against. The list has to be
>>> getting close to a record for any publication. Hell, he might even
>>> have another world record to list on his BIO. Add in the ex-employees,
>>> ex-lawyers, RAH participants and the list grows to be very impressive
>>> in a sick sort of way. That would be a great list to post for the
>>> potiential advertisers to see wouldn't it?
>> One has but to ask. Here's the lawsuits Zoom or his companies have filed. For
>> brevity, I've shortened down the Plaintiff name to the first on the list.
>>
>> AIREDALE PRESS INC VS.BRADY R B JACOB COY
>> Polk Co. Case: 1994CA-001680-0000-00
>> Result: Dismissed due to lack of prosecution 1994
>> [Coy Jacob has an aircraft modification company, don't know if they advertised
>> or not]
>>
>> AIREDALE PRESS INC vs. KROPP ENTER INC
>> Polk Co. Case: 1993SC-000016-0000-WH
>> Result: Apparent out-of-court settlement 1/8/1993
>> [Aviation supply company, don't know if they advertised]
>>
>> AIREDALE PRESS INC vs. BOTTOM LINE SALES
>> Polk Co. Case:1993SC-000017-0000-WH
>> Result: Dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction 1/8/1993
>> [Don't know anything about this company]
>>
>> AIREDALE PRESS INC vs. AIRCRAFT REFINISHING SYST INC
>> Polk Co. Case: 1993SC-000018-0000-WH
>> Result: Apparent out-of-court settlement 1/8/1993
>> [Don't know if they advertised]
>>
>> AIREDALE PRESS INC vs. HITLAW FRANK
>> Highlands Co. Case: 93000102GCS
>> Result: Dismissed due to lack of Prosecution 3/30/1993
>>
>> AIREDALE PRESS INC vs. COOKE KENNETH
>> Polk Co. Case: 1993CA-000727-0000-00
>> Result: Dismissed due to lack of prosecution 3/31/1993
>> [Cooke was a former editor]
>>
>> AIREDALE PRESS INC vs. FLIGHTWORKS CORP & RAMEY LAUREL
>> Polk Co. Case: 1993CA-002605-0000-00
>> Result: Out of court settlement 11/18/1993
>> [Ramey was another former editor, and Campbell's former fiance. Flightworks was
>> a former advertiser]
>>
>> JAMES CAMPBELL VS. VERNON BARR, DANIEL GRUNLOH, DAVID HYDE, RICHARD ILFELD,
>> HAPPY MILES, JOHN OUSTERHOUT, WILLIAM PHILLIPS, CHARLIE PORTER, ANTHONY PUCILLO,
>> RICHARD RILEY, BILL ROBIE, CHUCK SLUSZARCYK, ALAN STAATS, WALT TROYER, RONALD
>> WANTTAJA (hey, that's me! :-)
>> Palm Beach Case: CL 97 006570 AJ (Countersuit in Tony Pucillo's Fraud, RICO,
>> Libel, etc. Lawsuit against Campbell.
>> Result: Only ~half the counter-defendants served, most of the rest were
>> dismissed due to improper service, one counter-defendant deceased, and the final
>> counder-defendant dismissed due to lack of prosecution.
>> [Man, it's getting tough to remember. Counter defendants included a former
>> editor, a former writer, a former employee, and two former advertisers.]
>>
>> AERO-MEDIA USA INC vs. SUN N FUN
>> Case: 1999CA-001171-0000-00
>> Result: Campbell Lost 4/1/1999
>> [Former advertiser]
>>
>> AERO-NEWS NETWORK INC vs. PULSAR AIRCRAFT CORP
>> Case: 2002SC-000241-0000-WH
>> Result: Campbell Lost. 4/11/2002
>> [Advertiser]
>>
>> AERO-NEWS NETWORK INC vs. ROTARY AIR FORCE
>> Case: 2002SC-000241-0000-WH
>> Result: Out of court settlement 4/12/2002
>> [Advertiser]
>>
>> CAMPBELL JAMES vs. SUN N FUN FLY-IN INC AND DOTHAN SECURITY
>> Case: 2003CA-002626-0000-WH
>> Result: Dothan dismissed in 2005, otherwise still ongoing
>> [SnF, again, was a former advertiser]
>>
>> AERO-NEWS NETWORK INC vs. POWRACHUTE CORPORATION
>> Case: 2005CA-001448-0000-LK
>> Result: Default Settlement for Plaintiff 4/15/2005
>> [Advertiser]
>>
>> AERO-NEWS NETWORK INC vs. CONTROLVISION CORPORATION
>> Case: 2005CA-001449-0000-LK
>> Result: Ongoing
>> [Advertiser]
>>
>> AERO-NEWS NETWORK INC vs. LIBERTY AEROSPACE INC.
>> Case: 2005CC-001882-0000-LK
>> Result: Ongoing
>> [Advertiser]
>>
>> These are just the cases I've found on the Polk County web page, plus the Hitlaw
>> case (which Frank posted about a while back) and, of course, the RAH-15 case.
>> Out of the fifteen, he's won one by default and achieved an out-of-court
>> settlement in four. In one of the out-of-court settlements (Flightworks) he
>> claimed that the settlement didn't even cover his court costs.
>
> Boy I forgot some of those.What would be even more interesting would be a list
> of people who he threatened to sue .That list would be quite large ,I suppose if
> such a list were compiled those who claimed to have been threatened should have
> some kind of proof ie internet post,e mail ,letter etc to support the
> claim........Then there would be a catagory of those who were threatened
> verbally but with no visible proof. Those lists would be huge and a lot of fun
> to review :-)
>
> Chuck S
>
An Auxiliary I have Been Zoomed club?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[Dan[_2_]]

DABEAR wrote:
> Hanoi Juan Jimenez wrote:
<snip>
>
>> Who cares. You run like a hooker away from cops when you are told to post
>> your aviation experience. Put up or shut the **** up. Simple as that.
>
> Make me...traitor boy...simple as that.
>
Don't you just love it when yawn says "put up or shut up" when he
never has when it's said to him?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[olympusE1]

Harry K wrote:
> I find it suspicious that Juan dissappeared the instant you began talk
> of _his_ credentials and spoke of going to the Marines about it. A bit
> early to be certain yet but it looks like he may have left a trail of
> dust. Only been about 24 hours.
>
> Harry K

....my guess, and this is just conjecture, is that he was pulled off by
his master who is, in all likelihood, starting to hear from the RRL and
other entities. zoom apparently looses his pet rat every time someone
takes him to task on his self-aggrandizing nonsense; this time, though,
it has backfired and i think zoom has put him back in the cage in the
hopes that the hornet's nest said pet rat has stirred up will quiet
down. i don't think that's going to happen.

i know for certain that, in "zoomspeak," a "number of international
news organizations" have been contacted with zoom's credentials of
another sort, i.e., transcripts of NTSB SE-4661 and Tulsa Trib
articles, copies of US Raviator articles and other assorted bits and
pieces of verbal sociopathy which he has been foolish enough to print
"thousands" of copies.

oops.

al

[olympusE1]

Harry K wrote:
> I find it suspicious that Juan dissappeared the instant you began talk
> of _his_ credentials and spoke of going to the Marines about it. A bit
> early to be certain yet but it looks like he may have left a trail of
> dust. Only been about 24 hours.
>
> Harry K

....my guess, and this is just conjecture, is that he was pulled off by
his master who is, in all likelihood, starting to hear from the RRL and
other entities. zoom apparently looses his pet rat every time someone
takes him to task on his self-aggrandizing nonsense; this time, though,
it has backfired and i think zoom has put him back in the cage in the
hopes that the hornet's nest said pet rat has stirred up will quiet
down. i don't think that's going to happen.

i know for certain that, in "zoomspeak," a "number of international
news organizations" have been contacted with zoom's credentials of
another sort, i.e., transcripts of NTSB SE-4661 and Tulsa Trib
articles, copies of US Raviator articles and other assorted bits and
pieces of verbal sociopathy which he has been foolish enough to print
"thousands" of copies.

oops.

al

[Al G[_1_]]

"olympusE1" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Harry K wrote:
>> I find it suspicious that Juan dissappeared the instant you began talk
>> of _his_ credentials and spoke of going to the Marines about it. A bit
>> early to be certain yet but it looks like he may have left a trail of
>> dust. Only been about 24 hours.
>>
>> Harry K
>
> ...my guess, and this is just conjecture, is that he was pulled off by
> his master who is, in all likelihood, starting to hear from the RRL and
> other entities. zoom apparently looses his pet rat every time someone
> takes him to task on his self-aggrandizing nonsense; this time, though,
> it has backfired and i think zoom has put him back in the cage in the
> hopes that the hornet's nest said pet rat has stirred up will quiet
> down. i don't think that's going to happen.
>
> i know for certain that, in "zoomspeak," a "number of international
> news organizations" have been contacted with zoom's credentials of
> another sort, i.e., transcripts of NTSB SE-4661 and Tulsa Trib
> articles, copies of US Raviator articles and other assorted bits and
> pieces of verbal sociopathy which he has been foolish enough to print
> "thousands" of copies.
>
> oops.
>
> al
>

It has gotten very quiet, and very quickly.

Not a word from Zoom since last Sunday.

Sandy's Email was Monday about noon.(RRL Director of Communications)

Nothing has changed in the Bio, maybe the "process" is underway.

Picture "Kilroy" peeking up out of a foxhole, all knuckles and eyeballs.

Al G

[Juan Jimenez[_1_]]

"Harry K" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
>
> This is way off topic right now but..
>
> I find it suspicious that Juan dissappeared the instant you began talk
> of _his_ credentials and spoke of going to the Marines about it. A bit
> early to be certain yet but it looks like he may have left a trail of
> dust. Only been about 24 hours.
>
> Harry K

I find it amusing that you think that the fact I have work to do means I
disappeared, or that I give a flying intercourse what your pet reporter
thinks he will accomplish by going to the Marine Corps. Why don't YOU go to
Corps and ask about me, nimrod? Go ahead, I dare ya. :)



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[Juan Jimenez[_1_]]

"olympusE1" > wrote in message
ps.com...
>
> ...my guess, and this is just conjecture, is that he was pulled off by
> his master who is, in all likelihood, starting to hear from the RRL and
> other entities.

Your guess, as usual, is wrong. I'm in NYC, teaching. Been busy. What's your
excuse? :)



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[Juan Jimenez[_1_]]

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Hanoi Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>
>> Sorry to burst your bubble yet again, I served. Not Air Force In A Box.
>> Marines. On the ramp and in the air.
>
> Oh, you didn't burst my bubble, Hanoi Juan...

Well, ****, you really think you're CNN, dontcha? Sorry, Ted you're not,
schmuck. Maybe his bootlicker. :)

> I found your website.
> Found what a traitor you are supporting that lying poser, who claims he
> was at My Lai...claims he was wounded in Vietnam...never stepped foot
> in country...and here you are supporting him!

And here you are, claiming you have aviation experience, but running like a
little girl when confronted. Who's the real coward? :)

> I'm older than you, traitor boy...and I know a damn site better than
> you just exactly what kind of crud you are...

And you continue to fantasize that I give a flying intercourse what you
think. Opinions. Assholes. Get it? :)

>> Who cares. You run like a hooker away from cops when you are told to post
>> your aviation experience. Put up or shut the **** up. Simple as that.
>
> Make me...traitor boy...simple as that.

More proof, coward. That yellow stripe down your neck to your ass is visible
a mile away. No wonder you served in a box at an airport. Tower mascot? :)



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[Juan Jimenez[_1_]]

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
.. .
>
> "DABEAR" > wrote in message
> ups.com...
>>
>> Dan wrote:
>>
>>
>>> He has presented a picture he claims is of him and he has claimed to
>>> have worked on aircraft.
>>
>>
>> Hey, Dan...was it posted on usenet? I'd like to get a copy of that
>> shot...thanks!
>
> It's not on Usenet, putz. It's on my web site. Parris Island, 1978,
> platoon 2061. 2nd MAW, 1978-1982.
>
> So when are you going to stop tucking your tail and post your aviation
> experience, coward? :)

More silence from the coward. :)



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[C J Campbell[_1_]]

On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:56:27 -0800, DABEAR wrote
(in article . com>):

>
>> Have to go for now, after printing zzzzoomys bio I got to disinfect
>> my printer.
>>
>> Frank M.Hitlaw
>
> Better off buying a new one...some diseases are incurable. You know,
> like Aids, certain Venereal Diseases out of Southeast Asia, and
> "Campbell's Syndrome!"
>

Please, not that. At least get the guy to change his name before you name a
syndrome after him.

[ChuckSlusarczyk]

In article >, C J Campbell
says...

>
>Please, not that. At least get the guy to change his name before you name a
>syndrome after him.

What was even worse was that there was a guy named Jim Campbell who lived very
close to Jim "zoom" Campbell in Florida. He got served with papers that were
zooms. He got all shook up trying to explain he wasn't the guy. So we used to
call him Jim Campbell "The Good" and zoom was Jim Campbell "the Bad".

So your safe :-)

See ya

Chuck S

[Al G[_1_]]

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
.. .
>
> "DABEAR" > wrote in message
> ps.com...
>>
>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>> http://www.aero-news.net/news/featurestories.cfm?ContentBlockID=816716A9-6B8C-4352-B653-17ABA431B643&Dynamic=1
>>
>> Oh, so Campbell sent you here to rehash his grandiose Barnstorming
>> piece...
>>
>> Why bother...no one wants to read his lies, let alone yours.
>
> Especially when all you yapping mutts say he should have registered the
> record with FAI, when in fact FAI did not begin accepting records in the
> microlight category until 1984.
>
Juan, you do realized, don't you, that before there was an "ultralight"
category of less than 300kg, there was, and still is, a less than 500kg
category. If someone wanted to set a record in an aircraft, of any weight,
there is now, and has been, a category for it. If the attempt had been made
in 1981, he would have had to compete with aircraft heavier than 300kg,
maybe even a prop driven BD5. The FAI certainly DID accept records from
lightweight aircraft prior to 1984. When you attempt a record in a weight
class, if your performance is good enough, you may saction and claim records
for weight classes above yours. For instance, I hold a World Class record in
Airplanes, propellor driven, 1000kg to 1500kg, or "C1-c". I also hold the
"C1, group 1" record for propellor driven aircraft regardless of weight. Now
Clay Lacy could probably dig out his DC6 or P51, and take the record away,
but in 27 years no one has done it. Zoom, could have claimed his record in
the same way. In fact, since it is an un-official, un-recorded, record, how
do you, or anyone else, know that someone else hasn't done the same thing,
better?

>Al, sonny, Marco knows it had not flown when the record application was
>submitted.

Sonny? Jeez Louise, how old a do you think you are?


Al G

[BobR]

Al,

You waste your time on Jaun. He has never admitted that he could
possibly be wrong much less actually admitting that he was wrong about
anything. His only action when faced with facts is to deny them and
start throwing insults. You are fighting with a pig in the pig pen and
the pig loves it. Logic and facts will never have any effect on him,
his mind (what there is of it) is already made up and facts will not
convince him to change it. Quit wasting you time with him, he just
isn't worth the effort or time.


Al G wrote:
> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
> .. .
> >
> > "DABEAR" > wrote in message
> > ps.com...
> >>
> >> Juan Jimenez wrote:
> >>> http://www.aero-news.net/news/featurestories.cfm?ContentBlockID=816716A9-6B8C-4352-B653-17ABA431B643&Dynamic=1
> >>
> >> Oh, so Campbell sent you here to rehash his grandiose Barnstorming
> >> piece...
> >>
> >> Why bother...no one wants to read his lies, let alone yours.
> >
> > Especially when all you yapping mutts say he should have registered the
> > record with FAI, when in fact FAI did not begin accepting records in the
> > microlight category until 1984.
> >
> Juan, you do realized, don't you, that before there was an "ultralight"
> category of less than 300kg, there was, and still is, a less than 500kg
> category. If someone wanted to set a record in an aircraft, of any weight,
> there is now, and has been, a category for it. If the attempt had been made
> in 1981, he would have had to compete with aircraft heavier than 300kg,
> maybe even a prop driven BD5. The FAI certainly DID accept records from
> lightweight aircraft prior to 1984. When you attempt a record in a weight
> class, if your performance is good enough, you may saction and claim records
> for weight classes above yours. For instance, I hold a World Class record in
> Airplanes, propellor driven, 1000kg to 1500kg, or "C1-c". I also hold the
> "C1, group 1" record for propellor driven aircraft regardless of weight. Now
> Clay Lacy could probably dig out his DC6 or P51, and take the record away,
> but in 27 years no one has done it. Zoom, could have claimed his record in
> the same way. In fact, since it is an un-official, un-recorded, record, how
> do you, or anyone else, know that someone else hasn't done the same thing,
> better?
>
> >Al, sonny, Marco knows it had not flown when the record application was
> >submitted.
>
> Sonny? Jeez Louise, how old a do you think you are?
>
>
> Al G

[DABEAR]

Al G wrote:


>
> Sonny? Jeez Louise, how old a do you think you are?
>
>
> Al G

Why, he's older than the crust he eats out of Captain Zoom's shorts ~
and that's petrified! <rimshot!>

[Al G[_1_]]

"BobR" > wrote in message
ps.com...
> Al,
>
> You waste your time on Jaun. He has never admitted that he could
> possibly be wrong much less actually admitting that he was wrong about
> anything. His only action when faced with facts is to deny them and
> start throwing insults. You are fighting with a pig in the pig pen and
> the pig loves it. Logic and facts will never have any effect on him,
> his mind (what there is of it) is already made up and facts will not
> convince him to change it. Quit wasting you time with him, he just
> isn't worth the effort or time.
>
>
> Al G wrote:
>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
>> .. .
>> >
>> > "DABEAR" > wrote in message
>> > ps.com...
>> >>
>> >> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> >>> http://www.aero-news.net/news/featurestories.cfm?ContentBlockID=816716A9-6B8C-4352-B653-17ABA431B643&Dynamic=1
>> >>
>> >> Oh, so Campbell sent you here to rehash his grandiose Barnstorming
>> >> piece...
>> >>
>> >> Why bother...no one wants to read his lies, let alone yours.
>> >
>> > Especially when all you yapping mutts say he should have registered the
>> > record with FAI, when in fact FAI did not begin accepting records in
>> > the
>> > microlight category until 1984.
>> >
>> Juan, you do realized, don't you, that before there was an
>> "ultralight"
>> category of less than 300kg, there was, and still is, a less than 500kg
>> category. If someone wanted to set a record in an aircraft, of any
>> weight,
>> there is now, and has been, a category for it. If the attempt had been
>> made
>> in 1981, he would have had to compete with aircraft heavier than 300kg,
>> maybe even a prop driven BD5. The FAI certainly DID accept records from
>> lightweight aircraft prior to 1984. When you attempt a record in a weight
>> class, if your performance is good enough, you may saction and claim
>> records
>> for weight classes above yours. For instance, I hold a World Class record
>> in
>> Airplanes, propellor driven, 1000kg to 1500kg, or "C1-c". I also hold
>> the
>> "C1, group 1" record for propellor driven aircraft regardless of weight.
>> Now
>> Clay Lacy could probably dig out his DC6 or P51, and take the record
>> away,
>> but in 27 years no one has done it. Zoom, could have claimed his record
>> in
>> the same way. In fact, since it is an un-official, un-recorded, record,
>> how
>> do you, or anyone else, know that someone else hasn't done the same
>> thing,
>> better?
>>
>> >Al, sonny, Marco knows it had not flown when the record application was
>> >submitted.
>>
>> Sonny? Jeez Louise, how old a do you think you are?
>>
>>
>> Al G
>

Bob,

You are absolutely right, of course. One of the flight intructors @
rec.aviation.student has a sig that says: "Teaching pigs to sing since
1976".

Al G

[Juan Jimenez[_1_]]

"Al G" > wrote in message
...
>
> Juan, you do realized, don't you, that before there was an "ultralight"
> category of less than 300kg, there was, and still is, a less than 500kg
> category.

Which was not part of the FAI categories in 1981. Give it a rest.

>>Al, sonny, Marco knows it had not flown when the record application was
>>submitted.
>
> Sonny? Jeez Louise, how old a do you think you are?

Old enough to know better than you.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[anon]

"ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
...
> A commercially rated pilot, Campbell has earned Flight instructor Ratings
> (CFI/A/I/ME/H) in fixed and rotary wing aircraft, and logged over 17,000
> flight
> hours in over 1100 different ultralights, jets, multi-engine A/C,
> helicopters,
> gyroplanes, autogyros, sailplanes, seaplanes, kit aircraft and general
> aviation
> birds.

Has anybody done the math on 17,000 flight hours?

If you flew one hour a day, it would take you 47 years to get 17,000 hours.

[red12049[_1_]]

Actually, he would have had to fly 2 hours a day, 365 days a year, missing
NO days, from the time he was 17 until now. Spoke with a retired Delta
pilot the other day. He has a bit over 17000 hours, including Marine
reserve time. According to him, in the "old" days, a retired airline pilot
would average about 22-24000 hours, but since the changes, starting in the
70's, most average about the same as he. The avergae aircraft owner/pilot
flies about 95-125 hours a year, according to the stats. You figure out who
is telling the truth.

Just my .02. YMMV


"anon" > wrote in message
...
> "ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
> ...
>> A commercially rated pilot, Campbell has earned Flight instructor Ratings
>> (CFI/A/I/ME/H) in fixed and rotary wing aircraft, and logged over 17,000
>> flight
>> hours in over 1100 different ultralights, jets, multi-engine A/C,
>> helicopters,
>> gyroplanes, autogyros, sailplanes, seaplanes, kit aircraft and general
>> aviation
>> birds.
>
> Has anybody done the math on 17,000 flight hours?
>
> If you flew one hour a day, it would take you 47 years to get 17,000
> hours.
>

[anon]

"red12049" > wrote in message
...
> Actually, he would have had to fly 2 hours a day, 365 days a year, missing
> NO days, from the time he was 17 until now.

And I guess he really racked up the hours flying ultralights when his
medical was yanked. How did he have time to skydive?

[Dan[_2_]]

anon wrote:
> "red12049" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Actually, he would have had to fly 2 hours a day, 365 days a year, missing
>> NO days, from the time he was 17 until now.
>
> And I guess he really racked up the hours flying ultralights when his
> medical was yanked. How did he have time to skydive?
>
>
Wing failure.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[BobR]

Come on guys, racking up 17,000 hours would be easy. You fly 8 hours
per day, 5 days per week, 52 weeks per years for 8 1/2 years and you
have it. I am really surprised that Zoom only has 17,000 hours
considering his record.


anon wrote:
> "red12049" > wrote in message
> ...
> > Actually, he would have had to fly 2 hours a day, 365 days a year, missing
> > NO days, from the time he was 17 until now.
>
> And I guess he really racked up the hours flying ultralights when his
> medical was yanked. How did he have time to skydive?

[Dan[_2_]]

BobR wrote:
> Come on guys, racking up 17,000 hours would be easy. You fly 8 hours
> per day, 5 days per week, 52 weeks per years for 8 1/2 years and you
> have it. I am really surprised that Zoom only has 17,000 hours
> considering his record.
>
>
>

It's even easier if you round off your minutes. He probably rounds to
the nearest hour so 31 minutes becomes an hour. Add that to the time he
has flights of fancy.....

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[Anthony W]

Richard Riley wrote:

> In your figuring, you should also note that Mr. Campbell doesn't have
> any type ratings.
>
> I think that means he has the world's record for the greatest number
> of hours flown in piston powered airplanes under 12,500 lbs. And
> probably the record for hours flown without an ATP.

I dunno, I think he has the worlds record for slinging bull****.

Tony

[Al G[_1_]]

"Richard Riley" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 17:17:58 -0500, "anon" > wrote:
>
>>"ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
...
>>> A commercially rated pilot, Campbell has earned Flight instructor
>>> Ratings
>>> (CFI/A/I/ME/H) in fixed and rotary wing aircraft, and logged over 17,000
>>> flight
>>> hours in over 1100 different ultralights, jets, multi-engine A/C,
>>> helicopters,
>>> gyroplanes, autogyros, sailplanes, seaplanes, kit aircraft and general
>>> aviation
>>> birds.
>>
>>Has anybody done the math on 17,000 flight hours?
>>
>>If you flew one hour a day, it would take you 47 years to get 17,000
>>hours.
>
> In your figuring, you should also note that Mr. Campbell doesn't have
> any type ratings.
>
> I think that means he has the world's record for the greatest number
> of hours flown in piston powered airplanes under 12,500 lbs. And
> probably the record for hours flown without an ATP.


No Type ratings? But he flew 1100 types. I'm not sure, but I don't think
there are 1100 types. That would be almost every aircraft type ever flown. I
do believe he would be hard pressed to show 1/10 that number. Truly a legend
in his own mind.

Haven't heard anything from the RRL. I wonder what they are up to.

Al G

[Robert Bonomi]

In article >,
Al G > wrote:
>
>"Richard Riley" > wrote in message
...
>> On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 17:17:58 -0500, "anon" > wrote:
>>
>>>"ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
...
>>>> A commercially rated pilot, Campbell has earned Flight instructor
>>>> Ratings
>>>> (CFI/A/I/ME/H) in fixed and rotary wing aircraft, and logged over 17,000
>>>> flight
>>>> hours in over 1100 different ultralights, jets, multi-engine A/C,
>>>> helicopters,
>>>> gyroplanes, autogyros, sailplanes, seaplanes, kit aircraft and general
>>>> aviation
>>>> birds.
>
> No Type ratings? But he flew 1100 types. I'm not sure, but I don't think
>there are 1100 types. That would be almost every aircraft type ever flown. I
>do believe he would be hard pressed to show 1/10 that number. Truly a legend
>in his own mind.


Read *carefully* It doesn't say 1100 different _types_, just 1100 different
aircraft. Also note that all it says is that he has 'logged flight hours'
in those craft -- it does *NOT* say that he was the PIC. Given that it
specifies 'jets', and 'multi-engine A/C', one might suspect he's counting
'flight' time spent in the passenger compartment of scheduled airlines.

Given a lack of type ratings, one might conclude that the claimed flight time
does not include pilot/co-pilot time in anything requiring a type rating, such
as a 'multi-engine' rating, or a 'seaplane' rating. A reasonable conclusion
would be that he was a _passenger_ in those types. Lending credence to the
suspicion in the prior paragraph. :)



Remember, "figures don't lie, but liars can figure." <grin>

[Harry K]

Richard Riley wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:34:25 -0000,
> (Robert Bonomi) wrote:
>
> >Read *carefully* It doesn't say 1100 different _types_, just 1100 different
> >aircraft. Also note that all it says is that he has 'logged flight hours'
> >in those craft -- it does *NOT* say that he was the PIC. Given that it
> >specifies 'jets', and 'multi-engine A/C', one might suspect he's counting
> >'flight' time spent in the passenger compartment of scheduled airlines.
> >
> >Given a lack of type ratings, one might conclude that the claimed flight time
> >does not include pilot/co-pilot time in anything requiring a type rating, such
> >as a 'multi-engine' rating, or a 'seaplane' rating. A reasonable conclusion
> >would be that he was a _passenger_ in those types. Lending credence to the
> >suspicion in the prior paragraph. :)
>
> This bio says 1100 aircraft, but his usual bio says 1100 types. He
> "justifies" it by saying that a 1968 Cessna 172 is a different type
> than an 1969 Cessna 172.
>
> (Of course, I don't believe that for a moment either. His Mooney sat
> on the ramp at Winterhaven with flat tires for more than 2 years.)

Maybe he counts individual flights in the same aircraft? After all,
each time he flies it is a different one as it is now 'older'.

Harry K

[ChuckSlusarczyk]

In article >, Richard Riley says...
>
>This bio says 1100 aircraft, but his usual bio says 1100 types. He
>"justifies" it by saying that a 1968 Cessna 172 is a different type
>than an 1969 Cessna 172.

Been out of town and the action continues:-) That's what he told me when I
questioned his claim of 1100 types.He said The 1982 Hawk is "different" from a
1992 and is a "different" plane . He loves to creat perceptions when the reality
is always something different.His claims of being a test pilot ,a HALO jumper et
al: might contain a small nugget of truth along with a ton of embellishment to
create the perception he is something he is not.


>
>(Of course, I don't believe that for a moment either. His Mooney sat
>on the ramp at Winterhaven with flat tires for more than 2 years.)

Wonder how many hours he "logged" in it during that time LOL!!
Credibility it was always about credibility.

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret

[Harry K]

Richard Riley wrote:
> On 3 Jan 2007 19:19:22 -0800, "Harry K" >
> wrote:
>
> >
> >Richard Riley wrote:
> >> On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:34:25 -0000,
> >> (Robert Bonomi) wrote:
> >>
> >> >Read *carefully* It doesn't say 1100 different _types_, just 1100 different
> >> >aircraft. Also note that all it says is that he has 'logged flight hours'
> >> >in those craft -- it does *NOT* say that he was the PIC. Given that it
> >> >specifies 'jets', and 'multi-engine A/C', one might suspect he's counting
> >> >'flight' time spent in the passenger compartment of scheduled airlines.
> >> >
> >> >Given a lack of type ratings, one might conclude that the claimed flight time
> >> >does not include pilot/co-pilot time in anything requiring a type rating, such
> >> >as a 'multi-engine' rating, or a 'seaplane' rating. A reasonable conclusion
> >> >would be that he was a _passenger_ in those types. Lending credence to the
> >> >suspicion in the prior paragraph. :)
> >>
> >> This bio says 1100 aircraft, but his usual bio says 1100 types. He
> >> "justifies" it by saying that a 1968 Cessna 172 is a different type
> >> than an 1969 Cessna 172.
> >>
> >> (Of course, I don't believe that for a moment either. His Mooney sat
> >> on the ramp at Winterhaven with flat tires for more than 2 years.)
> >
> >Maybe he counts individual flights in the same aircraft? After all,
> >each time he flies it is a different one as it is now 'older'.
> >
>
> Heck, it's got different gas in the tank, of course it's a different
> airplane!!!

And he can claim a different one every time he flies as a passenger as
it is likely the 757 on this flight is different from the last flight.

Harry K

[Al G[_1_]]

"Harry K" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Richard Riley wrote:
>> On 3 Jan 2007 19:19:22 -0800, "Harry K" >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Richard Riley wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:34:25 -0000,
>> >> (Robert Bonomi) wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Read *carefully* It doesn't say 1100 different _types_, just 1100
>> >> >different
>> >> >aircraft. Also note that all it says is that he has 'logged flight
>> >> >hours'
>> >> >in those craft -- it does *NOT* say that he was the PIC. Given that
>> >> >it
>> >> >specifies 'jets', and 'multi-engine A/C', one might suspect he's
>> >> >counting
>> >> >'flight' time spent in the passenger compartment of scheduled
>> >> >airlines.
>> >> >
>> >> >Given a lack of type ratings, one might conclude that the claimed
>> >> >flight time
>> >> >does not include pilot/co-pilot time in anything requiring a type
>> >> >rating, such
>> >> >as a 'multi-engine' rating, or a 'seaplane' rating. A reasonable
>> >> >conclusion
>> >> >would be that he was a _passenger_ in those types. Lending credence
>> >> >to the
>> >> >suspicion in the prior paragraph. :)
>> >>
>> >> This bio says 1100 aircraft, but his usual bio says 1100 types. He
>> >> "justifies" it by saying that a 1968 Cessna 172 is a different type
>> >> than an 1969 Cessna 172.
>> >>
>> >> (Of course, I don't believe that for a moment either. His Mooney sat
>> >> on the ramp at Winterhaven with flat tires for more than 2 years.)
>> >
>> >Maybe he counts individual flights in the same aircraft? After all,
>> >each time he flies it is a different one as it is now 'older'.
>> >
>>
>> Heck, it's got different gas in the tank, of course it's a different
>> airplane!!!
>
> And he can claim a different one every time he flies as a passenger as
> it is likely the 757 on this flight is different from the last flight.
>
> Harry K
>

Ok, I get it. In fact, I had extensive "control line" experience prior to my
actual licensing.

Al G

[ChuckSlusarczyk]

In article >, Al G says...
>>> And he can claim a different one every time he flies as a passenger as
>> it is likely the 757 on this flight is different from the last flight.
>>
>> Harry K
>>
>
>Ok, I get it. In fact, I had extensive "control line" experience prior to my
>actual licensing.

Gee I never thought about control line . I flew competition Combat ,Rat Race and
Carrier events for about 15 years bet I got an easy 3 - 4 thousand hours I never
counted. I still fly indoor free flight started when I was 9 so I bet there's
another 3-4 thousand hours.Then there's hand launched gliders ,RC and free
flight. I bet I got 12 -13 thousand hours and you should have seen some of the
loops rolls and spins I did with some of them. Some had a slight phugoid
tendency with a slightly damped yaw harmonic divergence and a delightful pitch
positive obedient yaw coupling. I went to the same journalistic schoo; zoom
attended. I guess I'm a test pilot as well with hundreds of test flights in new
untried designs.LOL!!!

Chuck S

[Roger[_4_]]

On 4 Jan 2007 04:24:15 -0800, ChuckSlusarczyk
> wrote:

>In article >, Richard Riley says...
>>
>>This bio says 1100 aircraft, but his usual bio says 1100 types. He
>>"justifies" it by saying that a 1968 Cessna 172 is a different type
>>than an 1969 Cessna 172.
>
>Been out of town and the action continues:-) That's what he told me when I
>questioned his claim of 1100 types.He said The 1982 Hawk is "different" from a
>1992 and is a "different" plane . He loves to creat perceptions when the reality
>is always something different.His claims of being a test pilot ,a HALO jumper et
>al: might contain a small nugget of truth along with a ton of embellishment to
>create the perception he is something he is not.
>
>
>>
>>(Of course, I don't believe that for a moment either. His Mooney sat
>>on the ramp at Winterhaven with flat tires for more than 2 years.)
>
>Wonder how many hours he "logged" in it during that time LOL!!
>Credibility it was always about credibility.

How about "P-51" time?<:-))

>
>Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret
Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com

[Robert Bonomi]

In article >,
Al G > wrote:
>
[[.. sneck ..]]
>
>Ok, I get it. In fact, I had extensive "control line" experience prior to my
>actual licensing.
>

Al,
How is anybody going to take you seriously, when you don't even have the
terminology down? That should be "fly by wire", not 'control line'. *GRIN*

[Al G[_1_]]

Some of you may remember the exchange a month ago with Zoom and the Rocket Racing league. After commenting on Zoom's Bio, I got the following response from Sandy Davenport, the "Director of Communications"



Thank you for your concern and alerting us to possible inaccuracies. We are looking into it and will update the bio if the questionable items cannot be verified.



Sandy Davenport, Director of Communications, Rocket Racing League

1120 Commerce Dr. Suite B, Las Cruces, NM 88011

Mailing Address:P O Box 16377, Las Cruces, NM 88004-6377

505-532-1543 Office, 505-639-0728 Cell, 505-532-1643 Fax



Well, it's been a month and I haven't heard anything, so I followed up with an email last week, asking if she had completed her investigation. I got no answer.



The Bio hasn't changed, and the "Director of Communications" isn't communicating, so I think we have our answer. I guess I have to conclude that honesty isn’t their strong suit.



Al G

[ChuckSlusarczyk]

In article >, Al G says...
>>
>Some of you may remember the exchange a month ago with Zoom and the =
>Rocket Racing league. After commenting on Zoom's Bio, I got the =
>following response from Sandy Davenport, the "Director of =
>Communications"
>
>=20
>
> Thank you for your concern and alerting us to possible inaccuracies. =
>We are looking into it and will update the bio if the questionable items =
>cannot be verified. =20
>
>=20
>
>Sandy Davenport, Director of Communications, Rocket Racing League
>
>1120 Commerce Dr. Suite B, Las Cruces, NM 88011
>
>Mailing Address:P O Box 16377, Las Cruces, NM 88004-6377
>
>505-532-1543 Office, 505-639-0728 Cell, 505-532-1643 Fax
>
>=20
>
>Well, it's been a month and I haven't heard anything, so I followed up =
>with an email last week, asking if she had completed her investigation. =
>I got no answer.=20
>
>=20
>
>The Bio hasn't changed, and the "Director of Communications" isn't =
>communicating, so I think we have our answer. I guess I have to conclude =
>that honesty isn=92t their strong suit.
>

Thanks for the update it reminds me to also do a follow up to the RRL..
Chuck S

[Juan Jimenez[_1_]]

Either that or yet another org has decided to do the right thing and ignore the whinings of the rah gaggle. :)
"Al G" > wrote in message ...


Some of you may remember the exchange a month ago with Zoom and the Rocket Racing league. After commenting on Zoom's Bio, I got the following response from Sandy Davenport, the "Director of Communications"



Thank you for your concern and alerting us to possible inaccuracies. We are looking into it and will update the bio if the questionable items cannot be verified.



Sandy Davenport, Director of Communications, Rocket Racing League

1120 Commerce Dr. Suite B, Las Cruces, NM 88011

Mailing Address:P O Box 16377, Las Cruces, NM 88004-6377

505-532-1543 Office, 505-639-0728 Cell, 505-532-1643 Fax



Well, it's been a month and I haven't heard anything, so I followed up with an email last week, asking if she had completed her investigation. I got no answer.



The Bio hasn't changed, and the "Director of Communications" isn't communicating, so I think we have our answer. I guess I have to conclude that honesty isn’t their strong suit.



Al G

[Alphonse Le Creur[_1_]]

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
:

> Either that or yet another org has decided to do the right thing and
> ignore the whinings of the rah gaggle. :)
> "Al G" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>
> Some of you may remember the exchange a month ago with Zoom and the
> Rocket Racing league. After commenting on Zoom's Bio, I got the
> following response from Sandy Davenport, the "Director of
> Communications"
>
>
>
> Thank you for your concern and alerting us to possible
> inaccuracies. We are looking into it and will update the bio if
> the questionable items cannot be verified.
>
>
>
> Sandy Davenport, Director of Communications, Rocket Racing League
>
> 1120 Commerce Dr. Suite B, Las Cruces, NM 88011
>
> Mailing Address:P O Box 16377, Las Cruces, NM 88004-6377
>
> 505-532-1543 Office, 505-639-0728 Cell, 505-532-1643 Fax
>
>
>
> Well, it's been a month and I haven't heard anything, so I followed
> up with an email last week, asking if she had completed her
> investigation. I got no answer.
>
>
>
> The Bio hasn't changed, and the "Director of Communications" isn't
> communicating, so I think we have our answer. I guess I have to
> conclude that honesty isn’t their strong suit.
>
What's your excuse? Personal experience?

[anon]

Juan,

Do you think that Campbell has flown as many hours as claimed and in as many different aircraft as claimed?

They'll follow the example of Pilot magazine and disassociate themselves with Campbell when they figure out the truth.

[ChuckSlusarczyk]

In article >, anon says...
>
>Do you think that Campbell has flown as many hours as claimed and in as =
>many different aircraft as claimed? =20
>
>They'll follow the example of Pilot magazine and disassociate themselves =
>with Campbell when they figure out the truth.=20

Anyone who is even remotely aware of how long it takes to accumulate 1700 hrs
can figure out zoom is lying about his time. I would think that somebody by now
on the RRL team who is truly a jet pilot with real experience would say
something to someone about zooms real qualifications.Although I feel zoom will
never fly a rocket racer much like jaun will never fly a BD-5 .To fly either one
requires skill,experience and a bit of testicular fortitude which both lack.

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret

"zoom can fool some of the people some of the time ,some of the people none of
the time and jaun...all the time"....chuck s

[BobR]

Nobody in their right mind would invest a cent in allowing Zoom to fly
their aircraft in a racing league. First of all, no other pilot would
want to be in the same sky with him. I don't care how many types of
aircraft he has supposedly flown or how many "hours" he has, if he
doesn't have the proof of solid consequtive hours in high performance
aircraft, they would not allow him to race.


Richard Riley wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 23:28:42 -0500, "anon" > wrote:
>
> >Juan,
> >
> >Do you think that Campbell has flown as many hours as claimed and in as many different aircraft as claimed?
> >
> >They'll follow the example of Pilot magazine and disassociate themselves with Campbell when they figure out the truth.
> >
>
> They never planned on acutally letting him FLY. I mean, which team is
> going to hire him, over someone with real qualifications?
>
> The teams that have ponied in with money to buy airplanes so far have
> brought their own pilots. The "first 4" pilot press release was just
> that - a press release.

[Lou]

On Jan 24, 9:06 am, "BobR" > wrote:
> Nobody in their right mind would invest a cent in allowing Zoom to fly
> their aircraft in a racing league. First of all, no other pilot would
> want to be in the same sky with him.

If no other pilot would want to be in the same sky, wouldn't he win?

Sorry, just had to.
Lou

[Juan Jimenez[_1_]]

"Alphonse Le Creur" > wrote in message
.130...
> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
> :
>
>> Either that or yet another org has decided to do the right thing and
>> ignore the whinings of the rah gaggle. :)
>> "Al G" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>
>> Some of you may remember the exchange a month ago with Zoom and the
>> Rocket Racing league. After commenting on Zoom's Bio, I got the
>> following response from Sandy Davenport, the "Director of
>> Communications"
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you for your concern and alerting us to possible
>> inaccuracies. We are looking into it and will update the bio if
>> the questionable items cannot be verified.
>>
>>
>>
>> Sandy Davenport, Director of Communications, Rocket Racing League
>>
>> 1120 Commerce Dr. Suite B, Las Cruces, NM 88011
>>
>> Mailing Address:P O Box 16377, Las Cruces, NM 88004-6377
>>
>> 505-532-1543 Office, 505-639-0728 Cell, 505-532-1643 Fax
>>
>>
>>
>> Well, it's been a month and I haven't heard anything, so I followed
>> up with an email last week, asking if she had completed her
>> investigation. I got no answer.
>>
>>
>>
>> The Bio hasn't changed, and the "Director of Communications" isn't
>> communicating, so I think we have our answer. I guess I have to
>> conclude that honesty isn't their strong suit.
>>
> What's your excuse? Personal experience?

You're the one out to get attention. You tell us.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[Juan Jimenez[_1_]]

"anon" > wrote in message
...
Juan,

> Do you think that Campbell has flown as many hours as claimed and in as
> many different aircraft as claimed?

The more relevant question is whether I care what the rah gaggle thinks
about Jim's claims. The answer to that one is a resounding "no".

> They'll follow the example of Pilot magazine and disassociate themselves
> with Campbell when they figure out the truth.

The rah gaggle has been repeating this line for years, and no such thing
ever happens. Don't hold your breath. Find something more constructive to do
with your time.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[Alphonse Le Creur[_1_]]

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in news:45bb75e2$0$24327$88260bb3
@free.teranews.com:

>
> "Alphonse Le Creur" > wrote in message
> .130...
>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>> Either that or yet another org has decided to do the right thing and
>>> ignore the whinings of the rah gaggle. :)
>>> "Al G" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>
>>>
>>> Some of you may remember the exchange a month ago with Zoom and
the
>>> Rocket Racing league. After commenting on Zoom's Bio, I got the
>>> following response from Sandy Davenport, the "Director of
>>> Communications"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you for your concern and alerting us to possible
>>> inaccuracies. We are looking into it and will update the bio if
>>> the questionable items cannot be verified.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sandy Davenport, Director of Communications, Rocket Racing League
>>>
>>> 1120 Commerce Dr. Suite B, Las Cruces, NM 88011
>>>
>>> Mailing Address:P O Box 16377, Las Cruces, NM 88004-6377
>>>
>>> 505-532-1543 Office, 505-639-0728 Cell, 505-532-1643 Fax
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Well, it's been a month and I haven't heard anything, so I
followed
>>> up with an email last week, asking if she had completed her
>>> investigation. I got no answer.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The Bio hasn't changed, and the "Director of Communications" isn't
>>> communicating, so I think we have our answer. I guess I have to
>>> conclude that honesty isn't their strong suit.
>>>
>> What's your excuse? Personal experience?
>
> You're the one out to get attention. You tell us.
>

Since you ask, I don't think you need an excuse..


It's just the way you are..

and attention? Moi?

Guess again, sunshine.

BTW, who's "us"

You and your marylin Monroe Mascot?

[Alphonse Le Creur[_1_]]

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
:

>
> "anon" > wrote in message
> ...
> Juan,
>
>> Do you think that Campbell has flown as many hours as claimed and in
>> as many different aircraft as claimed?
>
> The more relevant question is whether I care what the rah gaggle
> thinks about Jim's claims. The answer to that one is a resounding
> "no".

Your words, they say no, but your eyes,,,

[Juan Jimenez[_1_]]

"Alphonse Le Creur" > wrote in message
.130...
> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
> :
>
>>
>> "anon" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> Juan,
>>
>>> Do you think that Campbell has flown as many hours as claimed and in
>>> as many different aircraft as claimed?
>>
>> The more relevant question is whether I care what the rah gaggle
>> thinks about Jim's claims. The answer to that one is a resounding
>> "no".
>
> Your words, they say no, but your eyes,,,

....tell me you're hallucinating again.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[Alphonse Le Creur]

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in news:45c7aad1$0$16268$88260bb3
@free.teranews.com:

>
> "Alphonse Le Creur" > wrote in message
> .130...
>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>>
>>> "anon" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>> Juan,
>>>
>>>> Do you think that Campbell has flown as many hours as claimed and
in
>>>> as many different aircraft as claimed?
>>>
>>> The more relevant question is whether I care what the rah gaggle
>>> thinks about Jim's claims. The answer to that one is a resounding
>>> "no".
>>
>> Your words, they say no, but your eyes,,,
>
> ...tell me you're hallucinating again.


Why would you want me to tell you that? If I was would you try and
convince me you can fly?

[Juan Jimenez[_1_]]

"Alphonse Le Creur" > wrote in message
.130...
>>>>
>>>> The more relevant question is whether I care what the rah gaggle
>>>> thinks about Jim's claims. The answer to that one is a resounding
>>>> "no".
>>>
>>> Your words, they say no, but your eyes,,,
>>
>> ...tell me you're hallucinating again.
>
>
> Why would you want me to tell you that? If I was would you try and
> convince me you can fly?

Why would anyone care what you are convinced or not convinced of? :)



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[Alphonse Le Creure]

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in news:45d4d216$0$16331$88260bb3
@free.teranews.com:

>
> "Alphonse Le Creur" > wrote in message
> .130...
>>>>>
>>>>> The more relevant question is whether I care what the rah gaggle
>>>>> thinks about Jim's claims. The answer to that one is a resounding
>>>>> "no".
>>>>
>>>> Your words, they say no, but your eyes,,,
>>>
>>> ...tell me you're hallucinating again.
>>
>>
>> Why would you want me to tell you that? If I was would you try and
>> convince me you can fly?
>
> Why would anyone care what you are convinced or not convinced of? :)
>

I don't know. Why are you concerned what I'm convinced of, lameboi?




>