FYI Bio zoom ZZZZZZZZ [Archive]

ChuckSlusarczyk

December 13th 06, 01:01 PM

This is the updated zoom bio from the RRL web site it's a hoot!!Just for grins
I'm going to contact National Geographic.Popular Science and Popular Mechanics
to see if zoom ever had a published article in them. Here's where it's at:

www.rocketracingleague.com/bio_jim-campbell.html

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret

and now heeeerrreeesss the bio!!!
__________________________________________________ _____________________________

Jim Campbell
Advisor, Pilot, Aviation
James R. "Zoom" Campbell may be the world's busiest aviation journalist having
had his adventures and/or stories documented in US Aviator, Popular Science,
Popular Mechanics, Time, Air Progress, Sport Pilot, Kitplanes, National
Geographic, Private Pilot, Pacific Flyer, The Aero-News Network and over 100
other publications. The author of over 2000 magazine articles, tens of thousands
of news dispatches, the photographer of over 200 magazine covers, and arguably
one of the most experienced general and sport aviation journalist/test pilots in
the sport and general aviation writing business, Jim Campbell is driven by a
passion for aviation that few can match.
A commercially rated pilot, Campbell has earned Flight instructor Ratings
(CFI/A/I/ME/H) in fixed and rotary wing aircraft, and logged over 17,000 flight
hours in over 1100 different ultralights, jets, multi-engine A/C, helicopters,
gyroplanes, autogyros, sailplanes, seaplanes, kit aircraft and general aviation
birds.
Among Campbell's many other lofty accomplishments are his 1981 Ultralight World
Record High Altitude flight to 21,210 feet over Lakehurst, New Jersey; flying on
behalf of President Ronald Reagan as an airshow pilot during the 1981-82 Air and
Space Bicentennial; several years of film and TV aviation stunt work; his 1981
Ultralight Flight Across America; 17 published books in the aviation field (with
three more in the works for '06-'07); the first aviation journalist to solo and
evaluate the awesome Russian Sukhoi SU-26 and SU-31, the FEW P-51 Mustang, the
Unlimited 10-300 and many other high performance aircraft. Jim was also the
first fly-writer to sample and document the intriguing capabilities of the BD-10
Jet, the Glasair III, the Van's RV-6 and dozens of other pivotal aircraft.
The Editor-In-Chief and Chief of Flight Test Operations for the Aviation World's
Most Comprehensive DAILY News Service, the Aero-News Network; he is hard at work
on the next edition of the "SportPlane Resource Guide" and some aggressive
aerospace book projects. He is also heavily involved in a number of television,
radio and other media projects utilizing his aviation expertise.
More recently; Campbell led the news and photography team that provided primary
media pool services for the Ansari X PRIZE competition, including most of the
SpaceShipOne air-to-air photos that were published all over the world following
the three successful suborbital flights of Burt Rutan's world-changing
spacecraft. He has also served as principal Zero-G photographer during several
hundred parabolas for the Zero-G Corporation's Zero-Gravity flights. A graduate
of the National Test Pilot School, he is the CEO/Publisher of what has become
one of the aviation world's most widely read news services, the Aero-News
Network (http://www.aero-news.net).

Ron Wanttaja

December 13th 06, 03:05 PM

On 13 Dec 2006 05:01:04 -0800, ChuckSlusarczyk
> wrote:

>This is the updated zoom bio from the RRL web site it's a hoot!!Just for grins
>I'm going to contact National Geographic.Popular Science and Popular Mechanics
>to see if zoom ever had a published article in them. Here's where it's at:

Tony had me do some research during the lawsuit, Zoom did get an article or two
published in PM during the '80s. Never found anything in National Geographic;
someone said they heard it had been a letter, not an article.

For those who'd like an update to the Zoom lawsuit situation, here's my current
understanding:

1. Zoom's lawsuit against SnF's security company has been dismissed.

2. One of the two main complaints in the SnF case was dismissed...the one
relative to SnF posting his driver's license to assist security personnel.
Turns out, in Florida, the license is public record.

3. In January of this year, Zoom agreed to a deposition in March. Two weeks
prior to the deposition, he backed out, with his lawyer stating, ""...Mr.
Campbell will be out of the state during the month of March and possibly April."

Long trip.

4. Another set of depositions were scheduled for November, with SnF having Zoom
deposed and Zoom having five people scheduled to give depositions. Since
nothing has been added to the docket regarding rescheduling, I assume the
depositions were held as planned.

(Read the docket at:

https://ori2.polk-county.net/ct_web1/case_detail.asp?SearchType=Party+Name&ascaseid=272105&ascrttype=CR

5. In the lawsuits Zoom served at SnF 2005, Zoom gained a default judgement
against Powrachute for around $22,000. However, the company had been sold by
the time the suit was served, and judgement is thus against a Kansas company
that no longer exists (or if it still legally exists, it has no assets). It
seems that neither the sued version of Powrachute nor the current owner of the
aircraft line ever responded to the suit. This explains the default judgement,
and may indicate that it may be difficult to collect from either party.

6. Campbell also won a default judgement against Controlvision, but the
defendant's attorneys got it set aside in April. In August, Zoom said he was
ready to go to trial. A pretrial conference had been scheduled, and
Controlvision filed an objection. Zoom's attorney has since withdrew the notice
that they were ready for trial.

https://ori2.polk-county.net/ct_web1/case_detail.asp?SearchType=Party+Name&ascaseid=303383&ascrttype=CR

7. On the same date the motion was filed that indicated Zoom was ready to go to
trial with Controlvision, a similar motion was filed in Zoom's suit against
Liberty Aerospace. Zoom's attorney withdrew THIS notice a couple of days after
withdrawing the Controlvision one.

https://ori2.polk-county.net/ct_web1/case_detail.asp?SearchType=Party+Name&ascaseid=230604&ascrttype=CO

8. I don't know why the "ready for trial" notices were withdrawn. However,
they were both filed about the time the default judgement was being finalized in
the Powrachute case, and withdrawn about two months later. There are
undoubtedly good legal reasons why the notices were withdrawn, but note my
speculation about whether Zoom will actually ever collect anything from the
Powrachute default judgement. It may be that Zoom was anticipating using the
Powrachute judgement to fund his legal expenses in these trials. Alternately,
it may be that Zoom's attorney didn't want to be working on these cases with the
SnF depositions coming up.

Ron Wanttaja

BobR

December 13th 06, 03:38 PM

Gee...I wonder who wrote it for him?

They forgot to add that he walks on water and his **** doesn't stink.

ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
> This is the updated zoom bio from the RRL web site it's a hoot!!Just for grins
> I'm going to contact National Geographic.Popular Science and Popular Mechanics
> to see if zoom ever had a published article in them. Here's where it's at:
>
> www.rocketracingleague.com/bio_jim-campbell.html
>
>
> Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret
>
> and now heeeerrreeesss the bio!!!
> __________________________________________________ _____________________________
>
>
> Jim Campbell
> Advisor, Pilot, Aviation
> James R. "Zoom" Campbell may be the world's busiest aviation journalist having
> had his adventures and/or stories documented in US Aviator, Popular Science,
> Popular Mechanics, Time, Air Progress, Sport Pilot, Kitplanes, National
> Geographic, Private Pilot, Pacific Flyer, The Aero-News Network and over 100
> other publications. The author of over 2000 magazine articles, tens of thousands
> of news dispatches, the photographer of over 200 magazine covers, and arguably
> one of the most experienced general and sport aviation journalist/test pilots in
> the sport and general aviation writing business, Jim Campbell is driven by a
> passion for aviation that few can match.
> A commercially rated pilot, Campbell has earned Flight instructor Ratings
> (CFI/A/I/ME/H) in fixed and rotary wing aircraft, and logged over 17,000 flight
> hours in over 1100 different ultralights, jets, multi-engine A/C, helicopters,
> gyroplanes, autogyros, sailplanes, seaplanes, kit aircraft and general aviation
> birds.
> Among Campbell's many other lofty accomplishments are his 1981 Ultralight World
> Record High Altitude flight to 21,210 feet over Lakehurst, New Jersey; flying on
> behalf of President Ronald Reagan as an airshow pilot during the 1981-82 Air and
> Space Bicentennial; several years of film and TV aviation stunt work; his 1981
> Ultralight Flight Across America; 17 published books in the aviation field (with
> three more in the works for '06-'07); the first aviation journalist to solo and
> evaluate the awesome Russian Sukhoi SU-26 and SU-31, the FEW P-51 Mustang, the
> Unlimited 10-300 and many other high performance aircraft. Jim was also the
> first fly-writer to sample and document the intriguing capabilities of the BD-10
> Jet, the Glasair III, the Van's RV-6 and dozens of other pivotal aircraft.
> The Editor-In-Chief and Chief of Flight Test Operations for the Aviation World's
> Most Comprehensive DAILY News Service, the Aero-News Network; he is hard at work
> on the next edition of the "SportPlane Resource Guide" and some aggressive
> aerospace book projects. He is also heavily involved in a number of television,
> radio and other media projects utilizing his aviation expertise.
> More recently; Campbell led the news and photography team that provided primary
> media pool services for the Ansari X PRIZE competition, including most of the
> SpaceShipOne air-to-air photos that were published all over the world following
> the three successful suborbital flights of Burt Rutan's world-changing
> spacecraft. He has also served as principal Zero-G photographer during several
> hundred parabolas for the Zero-G Corporation's Zero-Gravity flights. A graduate
> of the National Test Pilot School, he is the CEO/Publisher of what has become
> one of the aviation world's most widely read news services, the Aero-News
> Network (http://www.aero-news.net).

BobR

December 13th 06, 03:43 PM

My oh my but we do sue a lot of our former advertisers don't we. I
wonder if KitPlanes and AVWEB have to sue so many of their advertisers.

Ron Wanttaja wrote:
> On 13 Dec 2006 05:01:04 -0800, ChuckSlusarczyk
> > wrote:
>
> >This is the updated zoom bio from the RRL web site it's a hoot!!Just for grins
> >I'm going to contact National Geographic.Popular Science and Popular Mechanics
> >to see if zoom ever had a published article in them. Here's where it's at:
>
> Tony had me do some research during the lawsuit, Zoom did get an article or two
> published in PM during the '80s. Never found anything in National Geographic;
> someone said they heard it had been a letter, not an article.
>
> For those who'd like an update to the Zoom lawsuit situation, here's my current
> understanding:
>
> 1. Zoom's lawsuit against SnF's security company has been dismissed.
>
> 2. One of the two main complaints in the SnF case was dismissed...the one
> relative to SnF posting his driver's license to assist security personnel.
> Turns out, in Florida, the license is public record.
>
> 3. In January of this year, Zoom agreed to a deposition in March. Two weeks
> prior to the deposition, he backed out, with his lawyer stating, ""...Mr.
> Campbell will be out of the state during the month of March and possibly April."
>
> Long trip.
>
> 4. Another set of depositions were scheduled for November, with SnF having Zoom
> deposed and Zoom having five people scheduled to give depositions. Since
> nothing has been added to the docket regarding rescheduling, I assume the
> depositions were held as planned.
>
> (Read the docket at:
>
> https://ori2.polk-county.net/ct_web1/case_detail.asp?SearchType=Party+Name&ascaseid=272105&ascrttype=CR
>
> 5. In the lawsuits Zoom served at SnF 2005, Zoom gained a default judgement
> against Powrachute for around $22,000. However, the company had been sold by
> the time the suit was served, and judgement is thus against a Kansas company
> that no longer exists (or if it still legally exists, it has no assets). It
> seems that neither the sued version of Powrachute nor the current owner of the
> aircraft line ever responded to the suit. This explains the default judgement,
> and may indicate that it may be difficult to collect from either party.
>
> 6. Campbell also won a default judgement against Controlvision, but the
> defendant's attorneys got it set aside in April. In August, Zoom said he was
> ready to go to trial. A pretrial conference had been scheduled, and
> Controlvision filed an objection. Zoom's attorney has since withdrew the notice
> that they were ready for trial.
>
> https://ori2.polk-county.net/ct_web1/case_detail.asp?SearchType=Party+Name&ascaseid=303383&ascrttype=CR
>
> 7. On the same date the motion was filed that indicated Zoom was ready to go to
> trial with Controlvision, a similar motion was filed in Zoom's suit against
> Liberty Aerospace. Zoom's attorney withdrew THIS notice a couple of days after
> withdrawing the Controlvision one.
>
> https://ori2.polk-county.net/ct_web1/case_detail.asp?SearchType=Party+Name&ascaseid=230604&ascrttype=CO
>
> 8. I don't know why the "ready for trial" notices were withdrawn. However,
> they were both filed about the time the default judgement was being finalized in
> the Powrachute case, and withdrawn about two months later. There are
> undoubtedly good legal reasons why the notices were withdrawn, but note my
> speculation about whether Zoom will actually ever collect anything from the
> Powrachute default judgement. It may be that Zoom was anticipating using the
> Powrachute judgement to fund his legal expenses in these trials. Alternately,
> it may be that Zoom's attorney didn't want to be working on these cases with the
> SnF depositions coming up.
>
> Ron Wanttaja

Harry K

December 13th 06, 04:06 PM

Al G[_1_]

December 13th 06, 04:52 PM

"ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
...
>

snip

> Among Campbell's many other lofty accomplishments are his 1981 Ultralight
> World
> Record High Altitude flight to 21,210 feet over Lakehurst, New Jersey

Really? Wouldn't the FAI know about it? A google search "FAI Campbell"
comes up with a Sue Campbell, but I didn't see a James. What am I missing?

Al G

Wayne Paul

December 13th 06, 05:18 PM

All official aviation related world records are maintained by the FAI. You
can view records at http://www.fai.org/records

When viewing the link, the first thing I noticed is that the FAI does not
have an "Ultralight" category. However, if you check airplanes under 300
kg/piston powered, you will not find him as the current or historical holder
of the an altitude record. The same is true for the Microlight category.

Wayne
HP-14 "6F"
http://www.soaridaho.com/Schreder

"Al G" > wrote in message
...
>
> "ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>
> snip
>
>> Among Campbell's many other lofty accomplishments are his 1981 Ultralight
>> World
>> Record High Altitude flight to 21,210 feet over Lakehurst, New Jersey
>
> Really? Wouldn't the FAI know about it? A google search "FAI Campbell"
> comes up with a Sue Campbell, but I didn't see a James. What am I missing?
>
> Al G
>
>

Wayne Paul

December 13th 06, 05:42 PM

I just noticed Steve Fossett's glider altitude record flight does not appear
in http://www.fai.org/records. However, I am sure it will be there in the
near future. (http://records.fai.org/gliding/pending.asp)

Wayne
HP-14 "6F"
http://www.soaridaho.com/Schreder

"Wayne Paul" > wrote in message
...
> All official aviation related world records are maintained by the FAI.
> You can view records at http://www.fai.org/records
>
> When viewing the link, the first thing I noticed is that the FAI does not
> have an "Ultralight" category. However, if you check airplanes under 300
> kg/piston powered, you will not find him as the current or historical
> holder of the an altitude record. The same is true for the Microlight
> category.
>
> Wayne
> HP-14 "6F"
> http://www.soaridaho.com/Schreder
>
>
>
> "Al G" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>
>> snip
>>
>>> Among Campbell's many other lofty accomplishments are his 1981
>>> Ultralight World
>>> Record High Altitude flight to 21,210 feet over Lakehurst, New Jersey
>>
>> Really? Wouldn't the FAI know about it? A google search "FAI Campbell"
>> comes up with a Sue Campbell, but I didn't see a James. What am I
>> missing?
>>
>> Al G
>>
>>
>
>

ChuckSlusarczyk

December 13th 06, 09:53 PM

In article >, Ron Wanttaja says...
>
>On 13 Dec 2006 05:01:04 -0800, ChuckSlusarczyk
> wrote:
>
>>This is the updated zoom bio from the RRL web site it's a hoot!!Just for grins
>>I'm going to contact National Geographic.Popular Science and Popular Mechanics
>>to see if zoom ever had a published article in them. Here's where it's at:
>
>Tony had me do some research during the lawsuit, Zoom did get an article or two
>published in PM during the '80s. Never found anything in National Geographic;
>someone said they heard it had been a letter, not an article.

I heard back from PM they said they have no searchable author data base.
National Geographic had a James Campbell who wrote an article about canoe trips
and the Everglades.Their base goes back to 1888. Hmmmm

Snip

..>4. Another set of depositions were scheduled for November, with SnF having
Zoom
>deposed and Zoom having five people scheduled to give depositions. Since
>nothing has been added to the docket regarding rescheduling, I assume the
>depositions were held as planned.

Can we get transcripts of the depositions? I'd love to see it.

See ya

Chuck RAH-14 ret and proud of it

olympusE1

December 14th 06, 12:37 AM

....from the november 2004 nat geo archives:

By Shelley Sperry

Jim Campbell waited a little longer than usual this year to predict who
would win the U.S. presidential election. With the Republican Party
convention held just before Labor Day, the University at Buffalo, SUNY
political scientist tweaked his model a bit to account for George W.
Bush receiving a post-convention bounce in the Labor Day Gallup Poll,
Campbell's most important factor in predicting the November vote. In
the end, he created post-convention and pre-convention models, and both
say that Bush will win. Campbell does not take into account the
presidential debates. Using pre-convention polling numbers, Campbell
says Bush wins 52.8 percent of the popular vote for the Republican and
Democratic parties. Post-convention numbers predict he wins 53.8
percent. But what about the all-important electoral college vote? "If
my forecast is close, within two points," Campbell declares, "Bush will
clearly win the electoral vote as well."

Campbell created his current forecasting model in 1990 using two kinds
of predictors: public opinion and economic growth. "The Labor Day
Gallup Poll of likely voters accounts for about two-thirds of the
model," he explains. That poll showed Bush ahead of Democrat John Kerry
by 7 percentage points. But Campbell believes we have to read polls
along with other factors to put them in context. "Historically, there
is a relationship between the economy and people's voting patterns." So
the second factor in the model is the gross domestic product (GDP)
growth rate in the second quarter of the election year. This year's
rate was 3.3 percent, and, according to Campbell, anything roughly over
3 percent favors the incumbent.

In early September, Campbell and colleagues who specialize in analyzing
elections and public opinion took part in a lively roundtable in
Chicago, where they discussed their 2004 election predictions. Of seven
diverse models, six forecasted Bush would win in November-and the
seventh saw another election "too close to call."

Although Democrats may see these as gloomy projections, they can take
heart from a similar group of prognosticators who picked Al Gore as the
winner of the 2000 election. That year Campbell came closest to
predicting the popular vote outcome, saying Gore would win 52.8
percent. Gore did win the popular vote, with 50.3 percent, but lost the
electoral college contest and the presidency. None of the pundits
predicted the election would be a virtual tie, ultimately settled by
the Supreme Court.

For more information about elections, polls, and predictions, Campbell
recommends the sources listed below.

Related Links
Update for The American Campaign
wings.buffalo.edu/polsci/faculty_and_research/campbell/campbell.htm
James E. Campbell provides an update to his book, The American
Campaign, which extends through the 2000 presidential election.

....now YOU know, and I know that James E. Campbell is not PsychoBoy,
despite Ms. Sperry's unfortunate truncation of his first name. BUT, we
all know that reality and Captain Zoom are complete strangers, so there
is little doubt that he would, somehow, some way, try to make the best
of this mention in geo.

al

Juan Jimenez

December 14th 06, 12:41 AM

"ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
...
>
> This is the updated zoom bio from the RRL web site it's a hoot!!Just for
> grins
> I'm going to contact National Geographic.Popular Science and Popular
> Mechanics
> to see if zoom ever had a published article in them.

No you won't. You'll motormouth as you always do, and never really follow up
on any of your diahrreal spiels. SOP for you. ZZzzz indeed.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez

December 14th 06, 01:01 AM

"Wayne Paul" > wrote in message
...
> All official aviation related world records are maintained by the FAI.
> You can view records at http://www.fai.org/records

This statement is false.

FAI only records aviation records for which it has chosen to establish
categories. It does not maintain "all official aviation related world
records."

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez

December 14th 06, 01:44 AM

http://www.aero-news.net/news/featurestories.cfm?ContentBlockID=816716A9-6B8C-4352-B653-17ABA431B643&Dynamic=1

FAI only records the records that it recognizes. For example, FAI does not
recognize microlight records for speed over a recognized course, but the NAA
does recognize those.

"Al G" > wrote in message
...
>
> "ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>
> snip
>
>> Among Campbell's many other lofty accomplishments are his 1981 Ultralight
>> World
>> Record High Altitude flight to 21,210 feet over Lakehurst, New Jersey
>
> Really? Wouldn't the FAI know about it? A google search "FAI Campbell"
> comes up with a Sue Campbell, but I didn't see a James. What am I missing?
>
> Al G
>
>

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Wayne Paul

December 14th 06, 01:50 AM

OK Juan, who then IS the official organization the maintains aviation world
records if it isn't the Federation Aeronautique Internationale?

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
.. .
>
> "Wayne Paul" > wrote in message
> ...
>> All official aviation related world records are maintained by the FAI.
>> You can view records at http://www.fai.org/records
>
> This statement is false.
>
> FAI only records aviation records for which it has chosen to establish
> categories. It does not maintain "all official aviation related world
> records."
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>

Juan Jimenez

December 14th 06, 01:59 AM

The NAA has some aviation-related records that FAI doesn't keep track of.
Guinness World Records has others as well. That's easy to verify.

"Wayne Paul" > wrote in message
...
> OK Juan, who then IS the official organization the maintains aviation
> world records if it isn't the Federation Aeronautique Internationale?
>
>
> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
> .. .
>>
>> "Wayne Paul" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> All official aviation related world records are maintained by the FAI.
>>> You can view records at http://www.fai.org/records
>>
>> This statement is false.
>>
>> FAI only records aviation records for which it has chosen to establish
>> categories. It does not maintain "all official aviation related world
>> records."
>>
>>
>> --
>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>
>
>

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Wayne Paul

December 14th 06, 02:50 AM

Juan, the NAA is an U.S. organization. I am only familiar with FAI glider
categories. The FAI does record glider close course speed records. (300 km,
500 km and 1000 km triangles as well as similar out and return records. In
years past there was also a 100 km category) I am sure the FAI maintains
similar close course speed records for airplanes/seaplanes.

I tried to find aviation records on the Geinness site
(http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/default.aspx); however was
unsuccessful.

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
.. .
> The NAA has some aviation-related records that FAI doesn't keep track of.
> Guinness World Records has others as well. That's easy to verify.
>
> "Wayne Paul" > wrote in message
> ...
>> OK Juan, who then IS the official organization the maintains aviation
>> world records if it isn't the Federation Aeronautique Internationale?
>>
>>
>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
>> .. .
>>>
>>> "Wayne Paul" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> All official aviation related world records are maintained by the FAI.
>>>> You can view records at http://www.fai.org/records
>>>
>>> This statement is false.
>>>
>>> FAI only records aviation records for which it has chosen to establish
>>> categories. It does not maintain "all official aviation related world
>>> records."
>>>

Dan[_2_]

December 14th 06, 03:29 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> http://www.aero-news.net/news/featurestories.cfm?ContentBlockID=816716A9-6B8C-4352-B653-17ABA431B643&Dynamic=1
>
Gee, he lost his chase plane according to your cite. No witnesses
no record.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[email protected]

December 14th 06, 03:30 AM

BobR wrote:
> Gee...I wonder who wrote it for him?
>
> They forgot to add that he walks on water and his **** doesn't stink.
>
>
>
> ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
> > This is the updated zoom bio from the RRL web site it's a hoot!!Just for grins
> > I'm going to contact National Geographic.Popular Science and Popular Mechanics
> > to see if zoom ever had a published article in them. Here's where it's at:
> >
> > www.rocketracingleague.com/bio_jim-campbell.html
> >
> >
> > Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret
> >
> > and now heeeerrreeesss the bio!!!
> > __________________________________________________ _____________________________

Wow he is now up to 17,000 hours just two years ago he was stuck at
13,000 hours!!! Must have been flying around 40 hours a week, every
week. How did he have time to do all his other duties or maybe he just
got a new pencil? Someone told me once that if Campbell did everything
he said he would have to be 75 years old. However, we will note that he
still hasn't test flown juans BD-5J...

Quite impressive without the stuff he left out,father, parachute
rigger,high altitude parachutist,NTSB consultant,Viet Nam veteran and
let's not forget all round hero for getting shot in the leg saving the
little girl from being raped while flying then Govenor Reagan on a
campaign trip.

Have to go for now, after printing zzzzoomys bio I got to disinfect
my printer.

Frank M.Hitlaw

[email protected]

December 14th 06, 03:37 AM

Ron Wanttaja

December 14th 06, 04:39 AM

On 13 Dec 2006 13:53:59 -0800, ChuckSlusarczyk
> wrote:

>>4. Another set of depositions were scheduled for November, with SnF having
>Zoom
>>deposed and Zoom having five people scheduled to give depositions. Since
>>nothing has been added to the docket regarding rescheduling, I assume the
>>depositions were held as planned.
>
>Can we get transcripts of the depositions? I'd love to see it.

Normally, yes. But Zoom has filed papers with the court that include claims SnF
has been "leaking" material to...wait for it...the Internet! He stated that he
wants some information kept from public records. Odd view for a journalist,
but, heck, he objected to the very *presence* of the news media at his FIRST SnF
trial.

My guess is that he's trying to keep the testimony of SnF's witnesses from the
record, as this would be the first public documentation of the reasons SnF
banned him.

Ron Wanttaja

ChuckSlusarczyk

December 14th 06, 01:12 PM

In article >, Ron Wanttaja says...

>>Can we get transcripts of the depositions? I'd love to see it.
>
>Normally, yes. But Zoom has filed papers with the court that include claims SnF
>has been "leaking" material to...wait for it...the Internet! He stated that he
>wants some information kept from public records. Odd view for a journalist,
>but, heck, he objected to the very *presence* of the news media at his FIRST SnF
>trial.

Sounds exactly like something he would do.What a phoney he sure likes to report
about other people but when it's about him somehow he thinks he's "special".

>
>My guess is that he's trying to keep the testimony of SnF's witnesses from the
>record, as this would be the first public documentation of the reasons SnF
>banned him.

I'm sure he doesn't want the truth revealed about the depositions he wants only
his version of the story told .If he so innocent he has nothing to hide....or
does he?? Credibility it was always about credibility.

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret

Al G[_1_]

December 14th 06, 04:23 PM

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
.. .
> The NAA has some aviation-related records that FAI doesn't keep track of.
> Guinness World Records has others as well. That's easy to verify.
>

The NAA is a US organization that sanctions and records US records. I am a
member and hold 3 records. There are several National record categories that
do not exist on a World Level, economy records for instance.

World records are sanctioned and recorded by the FAI. (Note the period) The
FAI is the ONLY internationally recognized authority. If you hold a World
record, I hold 2, your record is recorded by the FAI.

> FAI only records aviation records for which it has chosen to establish
> categories. It does not maintain "all official aviation related world
> records."
>

Was this attempt in an aircraft outside of the established categories? How?

Was this record attempt sanctioned by either organization?

Were there some kind of witnesses?

You can't just fly something somewhere and claim you hold a "World Record"
doing it.

Alan Gerharter

Wayne Paul

December 14th 06, 05:17 PM

Todd,

Thank you for the clarification. I knew the NAA had a relationship with the
FAI and that the SSA also. However, I didn't know it was SSA -> NAA -> FAI.

Wayne
HP-14 "6F"
http://www.soaridaho.com/Schreder

"T o d d P a t t i s t" > wrote in message
...
> "Al G" > wrote:
>
>>The NAA is a US organization that sanctions and records US records. I am a
>>member and hold 3 records. There are several National record categories
>>that
>>do not exist on a World Level, economy records for instance.
>>
>>World records are sanctioned and recorded by the FAI. (Note the period)
>>The
>>FAI is the ONLY internationally recognized authority. If you hold a World
>>record, I hold 2, your record is recorded by the FAI.
>
> Al G is correct here, but I'll add something to the
> relationships. The FAI sanctions all aviation world
> records. The FAI appoints a national organization for each
> country, and that org in the US is the NAA. The NAA can
> then pass authority for some areas to other organizations.
> The NAA has passed authority for glider records to the SSA
> (Soaring Society of America). Technically, world records
> pass from the SSA to the NAA, or from the NAA directly, to
> the FAI.
>
> The NAA/SSA handle National records and can do so in
> categories other than the categories recognized by the FAI.
> In the SSA they even have state records. I held 4 of those
> at various times (altitude and speed), flew a national
> record once that lasted about 24 hours (distance), so never
> was submitted, and even made a couple of world record
> attempts that required advance declaration, so I'm familiar
> with the process and organizations involved.
>
> I have no idea if Guinness recognizes any aviation records,
> but I have my doubts that they would recognize aviation
> related altitude records that were not also recognized by
> the FAI.
>
>>Was this attempt in an aircraft outside of the established categories?
>>How?
>>
>>Was this record attempt sanctioned by either organization?
>>
>>Were there some kind of witnesses?
>>
>>You can't just fly something somewhere and claim you hold a "World Record"
>>doing it.
>
> I agree with Al completely. If someone claims a world
> record, there should be something to back it up.
>
> --
> T o d d P a t t i s t
> (Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.)
>
> Make a commitment to learn something from every flight.
> Share what you learn.

[email protected]

December 14th 06, 05:41 PM

T o d d P a t t i s t wrote:
> "Al G" > wrote:
> ...
> >
> >You can't just fly something somewhere and claim you hold a "World Record"
> >doing it.

Of course you can.
If you do, you should expect to be doubted, especially if the claim
is false.

>
> I agree with Al completely. If someone claims a world
> record, there should be something to back it up.
>

FWIW, I don't recall Zoom claiming his 'record' was recognized by
anyone.

--

FF

Wayne Paul

December 14th 06, 08:04 PM

"T o d d P a t t i s t" > wrote in message
...
> "Wayne Paul" > wrote:
>
>>Thank you for the clarification. I knew the NAA had a relationship with
>>the
>>FAI and that the SSA also. However, I didn't know it was SSA -> NAA ->
>>FAI.
>
> The NAA charges the SSA some hefty fees, and the SSA has
> recently begun passing those fees along to people who set
> world records. The result is fewer world records. No one
> who has been involved in the process is sure what the NAA
> actually does, if anything, for those fees.
>
If I understand it correctly, historically the SSA paid a fee and as a
result we all got the sporting license required to claim NAA and FAI
records. (Something that I will never use flying a Schreder HP-14.)
Currently, if we want to claim a world record, we must purchase our own
sporting license. The license is a small cost compared to the cost of an
upgraded GPS/flight recorder. I currently fly with an EW Model D. It is
all I need for badges and contests.

Wayne
HP-14 "6F"
http://www.soaridaho.com/Schreder

DABEAR

December 15th 06, 08:18 AM

ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
> This is the updated zoom bio from the RRL web site it's a hoot!!Just for grins
> I'm going to contact National Geographic.Popular Science and Popular Mechanics
> to see if zoom ever had a published article in them. Here's where it's at:
>
> www.rocketracingleague.com/bio_jim-campbell.html
>
>
> Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret
>
> and now heeeerrreeesss the bio!!!
> __________________________________________________ _____________________________
>
>

> A commercially rated pilot, Campbell has earned Flight instructor Ratings
> (CFI/A/I/ME/H) in fixed and rotary wing aircraft, and logged over 17,000 flight
> hours in over 1100 different ultralights, jets, multi-engine A/C, helicopters,
> gyroplanes, autogyros, sailplanes, seaplanes, kit aircraft and general aviation
> birds.
> Among Campbell's many other lofty accomplishments are his 1981 Ultralight World
> Record High Altitude flight to 21,210 feet over Lakehurst, New Jersey; flying on
> behalf of President Ronald Reagan as an airshow pilot during the 1981-82 Air and
> Space Bicentennial; several years of film and TV aviation stunt work; his 1981
> Ultralight Flight Across America; 17 published books in the aviation field (with
> three more in the works for '06-'07); the first aviation journalist to solo and
> evaluate the awesome Russian Sukhoi SU-26 and SU-31, the FEW P-51 Mustang, the
> Unlimited 10-300 and many other high performance aircraft. Jim was also the
> first fly-writer to sample and document the intriguing capabilities of the BD-10
> Jet, the Glasair III, the Van's RV-6 and dozens of other pivotal aircraft.
>

Now, what I would like to see are his extensive logbooks documenting
all this ****, and from there, his certificates; plus the Police Report
on his getting shot in the leg saving the little girl, the NTSB report
that mentions Campbell coming forward as a witness to them in the
Cerritos Air Disaster, beyond Time Magazine, etc., etc., etc.

I remember when I brought up the fact this bio ~ and this is the third
rendition of a bio put up by/about/written by Campbell ~ indicated that
Campbell had test flown AND evaluated something like 1100 aircraft from
the age of thirteen. I questioned, editorially, "Who cares what a
thirteen year old's evaluation of an aircraft is?" In California, at
the time Campbell was thirteen, you had to be sixteen to get a license.
The RRL removed the bio, kept it dormant, then the changes were made
to the subsequent bio. "Test flown OR evaluated...la la la la la..."

The RRL, as it is, is nothing more than a fraud. Fraud has been
associated with a number of the people in it, including

1) the CEO, Granger Whitelaw, over the Amber Alert Portal issue in
Arizona;
2) Anousheh Ansari, accused with her husband Amid, of Insider Trading
in a stock issue in Massachusetts;
3) Mike Houghton, of the Reno Air Racing Association, whose fraud has
been documented at my websites, but more importantly, at the RARA site
www.airrace.org, which has finally pronounced (2006) itself as an
"Invitational, Entertainment Event" versus an open to all, Motorsports
competition, along with the fact he uses strong arm tactics and thugs
to get his way in Reno, and has Racketeering connections to corrupt in
Law Enforcement and business in the area;
4) his (Campbell's) good buddy, the Great and Magnificent Diamandis (OZ
~ the humbug), who despite the fact that he and his rocket scientists
can only "envision" (L.A. Daily News) that folks might see the Rocket
Racers at altitude because of the exhaust flame, and don't for sure
(!), know one way or the other, and whom, along with Whitelaw, think
they're going to change the face of Air Racing, despite having to place
limiters on the engine throttles to keep the aircraft from coming apart
in the hands of an agressive pilot, and who claim "Rocket Racers"
though the competitions will be conducted after the engines are off and
the racers in glide, sure make the concept of Rocket Racing as a
legitimate and viable sport Highly Questionable, especially when their
racers will max out at 300 mph and Unlimited Air Racing is currently
capable of speeds in the 500 mph lap venue; and then
5) Campbell, with a thirty year documented history of mental illness
and criminal misconduct that includes stalking, harassment, domestic
terrorism directed against fiance and ex-wife; impersonating a doctor;
prescribing medicines without a license; impersonating a Japan Air
Lines Boeing 747 pilot; trying to catch ultralights in his teeth
(Statue of Liberty, New York, with picture no less...); false
accusations against people he's worked with at Challenge publications;
allegations of making false statements to the Secret Service regarding
an alleged threat against the President by one of his enemies; his
Federal perjury which resulted in the temporary shut down of over 60 of
my websites, something which he will soon have to owe up to, hopefully
along with a stay in a Federal Penitentiary; his selling out as a
"Journalist;" his failure to abide by Journalistic Rules of Conduct and
Ethics; and on and on it goes with this clown, and the FAA and Law
Enforcement so far, have done virtually nothing about him. They take
away his license, then give it back to him, though he's diagnosed as a
schizophrenic by his Grandfather, a legitimate doctor.

His mental condition is known by the FAA and the NTSB and they give him
a license that no one else possessing his absolutely insane, if not
inane, mentality, would get ~ particularly when it comes to their own
Air Traffic Controllers! And then pilots are supposed to have a higher
medical standard then ATC!?

And then trying to profit personally on the blood of the victims of the
Cerritos/Aeromexico air disaster with his Time Magazine pronounciations
of Pull UP! Pull Up! For God's Sake Pull up!

His day is coming, mark my words on that. The government can carry him
around on their backs like a sacred cow all they want ~ especially a
sacred cow whose one religious belief they have in him surrounds him
giving them good press and his readers believing it as "Gospel" ~ but
enough exposure in the Press and in the Courts, and his downfall will
be just as hard and tragic as he will make it to be.

Hopefully, he won't be taking out an airliner full of people with him!

This individual shouldn't be flying; he shouldn't be in Journalism; he
should be institutionalized, preferably, in a Federal Penitentiary, and
anyone aiding and abetting his current existence in Journalism or
Aviation, should be sent there along with him as an Accessory to his
crimes. Especially, his good buddies at the FAA, Aero News and the
RRL.

Period.

Vietnam Veteran...bull...according to the paperwork I have, which is
nothing new on the internet, he didn't last half a year in the Air
Force. The Air Force won't release information on him nor why he was
discharged so quickly. Hey Campbell...let's see your DD Form 214
public, to include your RE code, moron!

Campbell reminds me of the Leonardo DiCaprio character from "Catch Me
If You Can." Only, he has nothing to offer that isn't already known as
fraud and criminal misconduct that the FAA and the Law could outsmart,
if they merely wanted to. Are prisons are full of people like him. I
say, make room for one more!!!

In fact, considering the conditions of the French Prison that held
DiCaprio's character, I say send him to a French prison. Get his stink
out of America, American Journalism and American Aerospace!

And as for Diamandis making a Rocket Racer out of this clown ~ I think
that holds up as the greatest proof of Diamandis' fraud, putting a
mental defective in the cockpit of a rocket powered plane in close
proximity to potentially hundreds of thousands of people on the
ground...

Diamandis annoints, and so be it! Someone needs to check the pilot
selection criteria at RRL and X Prize, for that matter, and the medical
requirements to be a Rocket Racer...they're getting a very dangerous
start from the Government, whose head is turned away from such a sore
subject as James R. "Captain Zoom" Cambell.

DABEAR

December 15th 06, 08:28 AM

BobR wrote:
> Gee...I wonder who wrote it for him?
>
> They forgot to add that he walks on water and his **** doesn't stink.

No, they merely got it wrong. **** floats...they mistook it for
walking.

DABEAR

December 15th 06, 08:42 AM

> Thank you for the clarification. I knew the NAA had a relationship with the
> FAI and that the SSA also. However, I didn't know it was SSA -> NAA -> FAI.

One additional clarification, and anyone can correct me if they care
to, but the NAA is the sanctioning authority for the FAI in regards to
records set in the United States. That makes the NAA subordinate to
the FAI, and the FAI the organization that establishes the World Record.

DABEAR

December 15th 06, 08:45 AM

<snipped> A google search "FAI Campbell" comes up with a Sue
Campbell, but I didn't see a James. What am I missing?

It's not yet in his bio...give it a week for the Rocket Scientists at
the RRL to consider...but Campbell also lays claim to being the subject
of the Johnny Cash song, "A Boy Named Sue..."

I wasn't sure if that meant he was prissy, litagious, or both...

DABEAR

December 15th 06, 08:48 AM

<snipped> I heard back from PM they said they have no searchable author
data base.
National Geographic had a James Campbell who wrote an article about
canoe trips
and the Everglades.Their base goes back to 1888. Hmmmm

Past life experience ala Shirley MacLaine. He saw a couple of guys in
a sinking canoe and yelled at the to "Pull Up! Pull up! For God's
sakes Pull Up!"

The last moments of their lives were spent staring at Campbell with a
really puzzled look on their faces...you know...like Deja Vu, only it
had been advanced to them in this case...

DABEAR

December 15th 06, 08:50 AM

> Wow! I was only into it about 2 lines before the BS rose over my head.
> If all the lies and distortions are extracted it doesn't leave much.

Hell, even Suzy Squeeze Me (Campbell's latest love interest...such a
listener!) can be deflated, much like one's Ego...

DABEAR

December 15th 06, 08:52 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> No you won't. You'll motormouth as you always do, and never really follow up
> on any of your diahrreal spiels. SOP for you. ZZzzz indeed.

According to the internet, he does follow up quite well. Have you even
bothered to read the documentation that's out there about your freaky
friend, Campbell?

Your boy is going down...quicker than a hooker on the Titanic...

I 'm hoping he takes some of his accessories with him! <G>

DABEAR

December 15th 06, 08:54 AM

Dan wrote:
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
> > http://www.aero-news.net/news/featurestories.cfm?ContentBlockID=816716A9-6B8C-4352-B653-17ABA431B643&Dynamic=1
> >
> Gee, he lost his chase plane according to your cite. No witnesses
> no record.
>
> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

As in, "No Guts, No Glory!" Or, "You had to be there!" LOL!

DABEAR

December 15th 06, 08:56 AM

> Have to go for now, after printing zzzzoomys bio I got to disinfect
> my printer.
>
> Frank M.Hitlaw

Better off buying a new one...some diseases are incurable. You know,
like Aids, certain Venereal Diseases out of Southeast Asia, and
"Campbell's Syndrome!"

DABEAR

December 15th 06, 08:59 AM

Mike Hogan wrote:

<snipped>.
>
> Does any organization recognize Mr. Campbell's altitude record?

Yeah, Aero News.Scam and the Rocket Racing Losers...

Now, whether or not any LEGITIMATE organization recognizes Mr.
Campbell's altitude record, I think there's a "Cannibas Collectors
Club" in Berkley, California...under the "You Must Be High"
Classification...

DABEAR

December 15th 06, 09:17 AM

<snipped>

>FWIW, I don't recall Zoom claiming his 'record' was recognized by
>anyone.

Then it's not a record. At best, it's a personal best or an oxymoron,
or an moron the size of a ox claiming he did something that he did not
do.

Either way, not a record. So why is the RRL falsely advertising that
he has a World Record and a number of achievements he does not possess?
Why is Campbell not correcting or proving the record(s) with his
logbooks, certificates and documentation from the FAI/NAI?

Perhaps, because they don't exist?

Or in a word that applies to all of Campbell's "friends:" "Fraud!"

The truly amazing thing that should garner note is that Campbell's
"friends" include the FAA and the NTSB!

Forget "Tombstone Mentality" in that case! Think of the Undertaker
having "License!" <G>

In the end, Campbell doesn't have to blow his own horn when others,
like Diamandis, Whitelaw and the RRL are blowing it for him...

....however, if he doesn't correct the record(s), then that's him saying
that the info is "True," when in fact it is not. In absence of the
denial of a statement, one is considered to be admitting that it's
true. Positive or Negative, if incorrect or untrue, the statement must
be denied.

That has been upheld in the Courts; that has been upheld in Journalism.

And if that is his record, then there should be a record of it and the
RRL should be providing proof of their statements, otherwise, they are
lying and are frauds as a result.

To remain silent when one knows that the Truth is otherwise...is
tantamount to lying. Some even consider it lying. What does that make
Campbell and his records claims, unproven for years, even decades?

DABEAR

December 15th 06, 09:39 AM

DABEAR wrote:
> <snipped>
> The truly amazing thing that should garner note is that Campbell's
> "friends" include the FAA and the NTSB!

>Forget "Tombstone Mentality" in that case! Think of the Undertaker
>having "License!" <G>

I'm replying to my own message to take this one statement one step
further:

Forget "Tombstone Mentality" in that case! Think of the Undertaker
having "License TO KILL!" <G> To have license to go out and kill so as
to keep his own business running and himself employed...

....that is the cat and canary relationship between the FAA and the
NTSB...through animous, they keep each other healthy and alive, so
neither really wants to kill the other though they claim they do.

The FAA brings the NTSB "business" (plane crash victims); the NTSB
keeps the FAA up to their ears in work ("You FAA gals and guys should
do something to correct the situation of all these plane crash
victims!").

And both use guys like Jim Campbell to stay alive...to have something
to do...and OH! WHAT JOY!

Campbell gives them good press in the process...until he or someone
else at his hand, becomes a corpse...or just another statistical "plane
crash victim."

....all thanks to their neglect. That includes Campbell, beyond the FAA
and the NTSB, as he should get off his ass and seriously go see a
doctor for the serious treatment the FAA and the NTSB have failed to
address "he needs" in his regard.

They're all guilty of his neglect, in other words.

No. Those are the words!

Blakey and her boyz need to be in prison on murder charges. The NTSB
needs to be disbanded since it has documented, all by itself, having to
repeatedly tell the FAA the same thing over and over again in the name
of "Accident Prevention!"

You've heard of File 13? You've heard of Catch 22? How about
Conundrum 69, wherein, the Government gives lip service to itself.
That is specifically, the relationship between the FAA and the NTSB,
and Captain Zoom is living proof of that!

Montblack

December 15th 06, 10:03 AM

("DABEAR" wrote)
> It's not yet in his bio...give it a week for the Rocket Scientists at the
> RRL to consider...but Campbell also lays claim to being the subject of the
> Johnny Cash song, "A Boy Named Sue..."
>
> I wasn't sure if that meant he was prissy, litagious, or both...

Not sure about the prissy part, but it appears to have litigious roots:

"Sue 'em," of course, later morphed into ...(wait for it)

...."Zzzooom"

Montblack

Montblack

December 15th 06, 10:16 AM

("DABEAR" wrote)
> To remain silent when one knows that the Truth is otherwise...is
> tantamount to lying. Some even consider it lying. What does that make
> Campbell and his records claims, unproven for years, even decades?

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0060665/quotes
A Man for All Seasons (1966)
By: Robert Bolt

Cromwell: Now, Sir Thomas, you stand on your silence.

Sir Thomas More: I do.

Cromwell: But, gentlemen of the jury, there are many kinds of silence.
Consider first the silence of a man who is dead. Let us suppose we go into
the room where he is laid out, and we listen: what do we hear? Silence. What
does it betoken, this silence? Nothing; this is silence pure and simple. But
let us take another case. Suppose I were to take a dagger from my sleeve and
make to kill the prisoner with it; and my lordships there, instead of crying
out for me to stop, maintained their silence. That would betoken! It would
betoken a willingness that I should do it, and under the law, they will be
guilty with me. So silence can, according to the circumstances, speak! Let
us consider now the circumstances of the prisoner's silence. The oath was
put to loyal subjects up and down the country, and they all declared His
Grace's title to be just and good. But when it came to the prisoner, he
refused! He calls this silence. Yet is there a man in this court - is there
a man in this country! - who does not know Sir Thomas More's opinion of this
title?

Crowd in court gallery: No!

Cromwell: Yet how can this be? Because this silence betokened, nay, this
silence was, not silence at all, but most eloquent denial!

Sir Thomas More: Not so. Not so, Master Secretary. The maxim is "Qui tacet
consentiret": the maxim of the law is "Silence gives consent". If therefore
you wish to construe what my silence betokened, you must construe that I
consented, not that I denied.

Cromwell: Is that in fact what the world construes from it? Do you pretend
that is what you wish the world to construe from it?

Sir Thomas More: The world must construe according to its wits; this court
must construe according to the law.

Montblack

Dan[_2_]

December 15th 06, 03:05 PM

DABEAR wrote:
>
>> Wow! I was only into it about 2 lines before the BS rose over my head.
>> If all the lies and distortions are extracted it doesn't leave much.
>
> Hell, even Suzy Squeeze Me (Campbell's latest love interest...such a
> listener!) can be deflated, much like one's Ego...
>
All it takes is a little prick.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

DABEAR

December 15th 06, 04:28 PM

Dan wrote:
> All it takes is a little prick.
>

Well, that describes Campbell figuratively, literally, and
anatomically! LOL! Is it a wonder that he's always "incorrect!?"

Harry K

December 15th 06, 04:31 PM

Dan wrote:
> DABEAR wrote:
> >
> >> Wow! I was only into it about 2 lines before the BS rose over my head.
> >> If all the lies and distortions are extracted it doesn't leave much.
> >
> > Hell, even Suzy Squeeze Me (Campbell's latest love interest...such a
> > listener!) can be deflated, much like one's Ego...
> >
> All it takes is a little prick.
>
> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

And _that_ I am sure he can supply.

Harry K

DABEAR

December 15th 06, 04:51 PM

> > All it takes is a little prick.
> >
> > Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>
> And _that_ I am sure he can supply.
>
> Harry K

DABEAR

December 15th 06, 04:57 PM

DABEAR wrote:
> > > All it takes is a little prick.
> > >
> > > Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
> >
> > And _that_ I am sure he can supply.
> >
> > Harry K

I was laughing so hard at this one I hit send by mistake!

I was going to say ~ would you care to place a wager on that!?

DABEAR

December 15th 06, 05:31 PM

Dan wrote:
> All it takes is a little prick.
>

Well, that describes Campbell figuratively, literally, and
anatomically! LOL! Is it a wonder that he's always "incorrect!?"

Al G[_1_]

December 15th 06, 06:36 PM

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
.. .
> The NAA has some aviation-related records that FAI doesn't keep track of.
> Guinness World Records has others as well. That's easy to verify.
>

Ok, Juan, I did.

James Campbell holds NO World records.
He holds NO National Records.
He is a confirmed Liar.

A thorough search of FAI records shows no James Campbell, in any
category.

The US National records are not available for online search, so I called
Art Greenfield at the NAA, yesterday. He did a physical search of the
archives, and sent me this email a few minutes ago:

Hi Al:

I can find no record in our archives of the 1981 flight by Jim Campbell. The
August 1983 edition of National Geographic contains an article mentioning it
as an "unofficial record," so that probably explains why I cannot find it in
our archives.

Hope this information helps,

Art

----------------------------------

A.W. Greenfield

Director, Contest and Records

National Aeronautic Association

1737 King Street, Suite 220

Alexandria, VA 22314

http://www.naa.aero

Tel (703) 527-0226 (ext. 102)

Fax (703) 527-0229

Mr Paul wrote:

>"Wayne Paul" > wrote in message
...
> All official aviation related world records are maintained by the FAI. You
> can view records at http://www.fai.org/records

To whit Juan replied:

>This statement is false.
>FAI only records aviation records for which it has chosen to establish
>categories. It does not maintain "all official aviation related world
>records."

Wrong, wrong, wrongitty wrong, wrong.

By Charter, that is exactly what the FAI does. From their website:
"FAI activities include the establishment of rules for the control and
certification of world aeronautical and astronautical records."

Categories start at 0kg, and go to unlimited. Outside your envelope?

Categories include Lighter than air, and heavier than air. Smoke and mirrors
are outside the category.

Some things not included in the FAI's categories:

1.) Magic

2.) Stunts

3.) Lies

The rocket racing league is shooting themselves in the foot here, big time.

Al G

John Ousterhout

December 16th 06, 12:17 AM

Al G wrote:
>
> James Campbell holds NO World records.
> He holds NO National Records.
> He is a confirmed Liar.

As a matter of fact Zoom was once determined to be a liar by an
Administrative Law Judge.

Go to http://ousterhout.net/ and select "The Captain Zoom story"
Then read "SE-4661, Zoom's NTSB Hearing Transcript" (or "SE-4661 explained")

Then read the bio at www.rocketracingleague.com/bio_jim-campbell.html

After you read them both, decide for yourself if Zoom has changed much.

- John Ousterhout
- rah/14

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 16th 06, 12:36 AM

"Wayne Paul" > wrote in message
...
> Juan, the NAA is an U.S. organization. I am only familiar with FAI glider
> categories.

That may explain why you think the FAI keeps all aviation related records.
It doesn't.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 16th 06, 12:38 AM

"Al G" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
> .. .
>> The NAA has some aviation-related records that FAI doesn't keep track of.
>> Guinness World Records has others as well. That's easy to verify.
>>
>
> The NAA is a US organization that sanctions and records US records. I am a
> member and hold 3 records. There are several National record categories
> that do not exist on a World Level, economy records for instance.
>
> World records are sanctioned and recorded by the FAI. (Note the period)
> The FAI is the ONLY internationally recognized authority. If you hold a
> World record, I hold 2, your record is recorded by the FAI.

Sorry, but you're wrong too. Only those records in categories the FAI
recognizes are sanctioned and recorded by FAI.

>> FAI only records aviation records for which it has chosen to establish
>> categories. It does not maintain "all official aviation related world
>> records."
>>
>
> Was this attempt in an aircraft outside of the established categories?
> How?
>
> Was this record attempt sanctioned by either organization?
>
> Were there some kind of witnesses?
>
> You can't just fly something somewhere and claim you hold a "World Record"
> doing it.

That's for you to find out. I simply pointed out that Wayne's statement, and
yours now, are incorrect.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 16th 06, 12:41 AM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> <snipped>
>
>>FWIW, I don't recall Zoom claiming his 'record' was recognized by
>>anyone.
>
> Then it's not a record.

Sorry, but that's wrong too. A record is a record if you document it to a
sufficient level that it can be verified. Whether or not the person chooses
to submit it to the FAI does not change that. An "FAI Record" is only such
if it is recognized by the FAI. Two different statements.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 16th 06, 12:42 AM

"Al G" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
> .. .
>> The NAA has some aviation-related records that FAI doesn't keep track of.
>> Guinness World Records has others as well. That's easy to verify.
>>
>
> Ok, Juan, I did.
>
> James Campbell holds NO World records.
> He holds NO National Records.
> He is a confirmed Liar.

Your opinion has been noted. <shrug>

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Al G[_1_]

December 16th 06, 12:42 AM

"John Ousterhout" > wrote in message
news:WWGgh.271544$FQ1.18418@attbi_s71...
> Al G wrote:
>>
>> James Campbell holds NO World records.
>> He holds NO National Records.
>> He is a confirmed Liar.
>
> As a matter of fact Zoom was once determined to be a liar by an
> Administrative Law Judge.
>

Well, sure, but that was just a judge, not a Flight Instructor!

I sent a copy of the letter from NAA, to the Rocket Racing league.

Al G

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 16th 06, 12:42 AM

"Dan" > wrote in message
...
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> http://www.aero-news.net/news/featurestories.cfm?ContentBlockID=816716A9-6B8C-4352-B653-17ABA431B643&Dynamic=1
>>
> Gee, he lost his chase plane according to your cite. No witnesses no
> record.
>
> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Still trying to prove intelligence? Notice the word "barograph" in the
article? <chuckle> Get over it.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 16th 06, 12:49 AM

"Al G" > wrote in message
...
>
> "John Ousterhout" > wrote in
> message news:WWGgh.271544$FQ1.18418@attbi_s71...
>> Al G wrote:
>>>
>>> James Campbell holds NO World records.
>>> He holds NO National Records.
>>> He is a confirmed Liar.
>>
>> As a matter of fact Zoom was once determined to be a liar by an
>> Administrative Law Judge.
>>
>
> Well, sure, but that was just a judge, not a Flight Instructor!
>
> I sent a copy of the letter from NAA, to the Rocket Racing league.

If you want to join RRL, have you considered just sending an application.

I find it intensely amusing how many of you schmucks run around trying to
make trouble for Campbell, and wind up bouncing off the wall, over and over
again. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Dan[_2_]

December 16th 06, 01:16 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> "Dan" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>> http://www.aero-news.net/news/featurestories.cfm?ContentBlockID=816716A9-6B8C-4352-B653-17ABA431B643&Dynamic=1
>>>
>> Gee, he lost his chase plane according to your cite. No witnesses no
>> record.
>>
>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>
> Still trying to prove intelligence? Notice the word "barograph" in the
> article? <chuckle> Get over it.
>
>
>
Yawn, is there an unbiased party who who verified calibration of
said barograph, sealed said barograph, placed said barograph in the
aircraft and verified that said barograph remained sealed with its
original seal and verified the maximum altitude upon completion of the
attempt? If so, who was this disinterested party and what organization,
if any, does he represent? Notary public? OK, what is his seal number
and state?

My point is he made a claim and has yet to prove it. If he wants to
be taken seriously on this point he should have submitted it to a
controlling authority. It really isn't that difficult to understand.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. It's just that
simple. You claim to have been a Marine, what would have happened to you
if you wore an unauthorized award, decoration or other distinctive
insignia on your uniform? It's all about integrity. I have seen
documentation of cambell's impersonation of a doctor, parachute
instructor etc. That is sufficient for me to doubt his claiming this
record.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Dan[_2_]

December 16th 06, 01:22 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> "DABEAR" > wrote in message
> oups.com...
>> <snipped>
>>
>>> FWIW, I don't recall Zoom claiming his 'record' was recognized by
>>> anyone.
>> Then it's not a record.
>
> Sorry, but that's wrong too. A record is a record if you document it to a
> sufficient level that it can be verified. Whether or not the person chooses
> to submit it to the FAI does not change that. An "FAI Record" is only such
> if it is recognized by the FAI. Two different statements.
>
The problem is cambell provides no disinterested documentation. I
don't think he can at this point. One of the advantages of an FAI
certified record is it's rather hard to disprove it.

I don't know about you, but if I had set a record and wanted to
announce it I'd have all the verification I could get and get it
recognized by FAI. Then again, if I had done what he said just for the
fun of it I would never claim the record.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 16th 06, 02:10 AM

"Dan" > wrote in message
...
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> "Dan" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>>> http://www.aero-news.net/news/featurestories.cfm?ContentBlockID=816716A9-6B8C-4352-B653-17ABA431B643&Dynamic=1
>>>>
>>> Gee, he lost his chase plane according to your cite. No witnesses no
>>> record.
>>>
>>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>>
>> Still trying to prove intelligence? Notice the word "barograph" in the
>> article? <chuckle> Get over it.
> Yawn, is there an unbiased party who who verified calibration of said
> barograph, sealed said barograph, placed said barograph in the aircraft
> and verified that said barograph remained sealed with its original seal
> and verified the maximum altitude upon completion of the attempt?

Go ask Jim. That is, assuming you can muster the cojones to do so, given no
one else around seems to have any when it comes to going to the source. All
bark, no bite.

> My point is he made a claim and has yet to prove it. If he wants to be
> taken seriously on this point he should have submitted it to a controlling
> authority. It really isn't that difficult to understand.

I don't think he really gives a damn what anyone else here thinks of what he
did or didn't do, Dan. If you haven't figured that out yet, here's your
chance.

Juan

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 16th 06, 02:10 AM

"Dan" > wrote in message
...
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> "DABEAR" > wrote in message
>> oups.com...
>>> <snipped>
>>>
>>>> FWIW, I don't recall Zoom claiming his 'record' was recognized by
>>>> anyone.
>>> Then it's not a record.
>>
>> Sorry, but that's wrong too. A record is a record if you document it to a
>> sufficient level that it can be verified. Whether or not the person
>> chooses to submit it to the FAI does not change that. An "FAI Record" is
>> only such if it is recognized by the FAI. Two different statements.
>>
> The problem is cambell provides no disinterested documentation.

Sorry, but no. Wrong answer.

Have you asked him? Never mind, I already know the answer.

The simple, incontrovertible fact is that you have no evidence to reach such
a conclusion. No one here does.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Dan[_2_]

December 16th 06, 02:25 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> "Dan" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>> "DABEAR" > wrote in message
>>> oups.com...
>>>> <snipped>
>>>>
>>>>> FWIW, I don't recall Zoom claiming his 'record' was recognized by
>>>>> anyone.
>>>> Then it's not a record.
>>> Sorry, but that's wrong too. A record is a record if you document it to a
>>> sufficient level that it can be verified. Whether or not the person
>>> chooses to submit it to the FAI does not change that. An "FAI Record" is
>>> only such if it is recognized by the FAI. Two different statements.
>>>
>> The problem is cambell provides no disinterested documentation.
>
> Sorry, but no. Wrong answer.
>
> Have you asked him? Never mind, I already know the answer.
>
> The simple, incontrovertible fact is that you have no evidence to reach such
> a conclusion. No one here does.
>
He hasn't yet provided proof in any publication. If you have such
proof provide it. As for asking him, why should I? It's up to him to
provide proof especially since he's on record about lying about other
accomplishments.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Dan[_2_]

December 16th 06, 02:30 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> "Dan" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>> "Dan" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>>>> http://www.aero-news.net/news/featurestories.cfm?ContentBlockID=816716A9-6B8C-4352-B653-17ABA431B643&Dynamic=1
>>>>>
>>>> Gee, he lost his chase plane according to your cite. No witnesses no
>>>> record.
>>>>
>>>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>>> Still trying to prove intelligence? Notice the word "barograph" in the
>>> article? <chuckle> Get over it.
>> Yawn, is there an unbiased party who who verified calibration of said
>> barograph, sealed said barograph, placed said barograph in the aircraft
>> and verified that said barograph remained sealed with its original seal
>> and verified the maximum altitude upon completion of the attempt?
>
> Go ask Jim. That is, assuming you can muster the cojones to do so, given no
> one else around seems to have any when it comes to going to the source. All
> bark, no bite.
>
>> My point is he made a claim and has yet to prove it. If he wants to be
>> taken seriously on this point he should have submitted it to a controlling
>> authority. It really isn't that difficult to understand.
>
> I don't think he really gives a damn what anyone else here thinks of what he
> did or didn't do, Dan. If you haven't figured that out yet, here's your
> chance.
>
> Juan
>
As a publisher he should care what people think of him. I used to
read ANN, but don't anymore. He's a proven liar which makes me suspect
everything he says.

On the other hand you criticize people who question his claims
without providing any proof of your own.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Montblack

December 16th 06, 05:06 AM

("John Ousterhout" wrote)
> Go to http://ousterhout.net/ and select "The Captain Zoom story"
> Then read "SE-4661, Zoom's NTSB Hearing Transcript" (or "SE-4661
> explained")
>
> Then read the bio at www.rocketracingleague.com/bio_jim-campbell.html

"April 1998 Jim Campbell sued me -- for posting a copy of a public record,
[NTSB hearing SE-4661], on my web page -- and 14 others for posting comment
critical of him on Usenet."

Page not found
The page you are looking for might have been removed,
had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable.

HTTP 404 - File not found

http://www.ousterhout.net/zoom/se4661.html
This page link is BAD

http://www.ousterhout.net/zoom/se-4661.html
This page link is GOOD. (I guessed <g>)

John,
The [NTSB hearing SE-4661] link needs the (-) between "se" and "4661"

Montblack

BobR

December 16th 06, 05:27 AM

It is a very simple concept, if you claim a WORLD RECORD which is what
Cambell clearly stated in the bio, it should be verifiable by a
recognized World Athority. What is that Athority and where can it be
verified. If it is not recorded and verifiable, it is BULL **** and
not a World Record. If yawn can provide the verifiable location of the
record he is just blowing air up everyones ass yet again.

Dan wrote:
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
> > "Dan" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> Juan Jimenez wrote:
> >>> "DABEAR" > wrote in message
> >>> oups.com...
> >>>> <snipped>
> >>>>
> >>>>> FWIW, I don't recall Zoom claiming his 'record' was recognized by
> >>>>> anyone.
> >>>> Then it's not a record.
> >>> Sorry, but that's wrong too. A record is a record if you document it to a
> >>> sufficient level that it can be verified. Whether or not the person
> >>> chooses to submit it to the FAI does not change that. An "FAI Record" is
> >>> only such if it is recognized by the FAI. Two different statements.
> >>>
> >> The problem is cambell provides no disinterested documentation.
> >
> > Sorry, but no. Wrong answer.
> >
> > Have you asked him? Never mind, I already know the answer.
> >
> > The simple, incontrovertible fact is that you have no evidence to reach such
> > a conclusion. No one here does.
> >
> He hasn't yet provided proof in any publication. If you have such
> proof provide it. As for asking him, why should I? It's up to him to
> provide proof especially since he's on record about lying about other
> accomplishments.
>
> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

John Ousterhout

December 16th 06, 05:57 AM

Montblack wrote:
> Page not found
> The page you are looking for might have been removed,
> had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable.
>
> HTTP 404 - File not found

Dear Mr. Black

Thank you for your valuable feedback. Your comments have been noted and
the deficiencies identified have been corrected.

YOU NICKING FUTPICKER! My wife the Grammar Nazi supplies all the
nicking futpicking that I can stand, thank you very much.

Sincerely yours
J. Ousterhout,
Webmonster - http://www.ousterhout.net
rah/14, EAA, AOPA, OPA, FAA, FFA, EIEIO

Dan[_2_]

December 16th 06, 06:54 AM

Montblack wrote:
> ("John Ousterhout" wrote)
>> Go to http://ousterhout.net/ and select "The Captain Zoom story"
>> Then read "SE-4661, Zoom's NTSB Hearing Transcript" (or "SE-4661
>> explained")
>>
>> Then read the bio at www.rocketracingleague.com/bio_jim-campbell.html
>
>
> "April 1998 Jim Campbell sued me -- for posting a copy of a public record,
> [NTSB hearing SE-4661], on my web page -- and 14 others for posting comment
> critical of him on Usenet."
>
>
> Page not found
> The page you are looking for might have been removed,
> had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable.
>
> HTTP 404 - File not found
>
> http://www.ousterhout.net/zoom/se4661.html
> This page link is BAD
>
> http://www.ousterhout.net/zoom/se-4661.html
> This page link is GOOD. (I guessed <g>)
>
> John,
> The [NTSB hearing SE-4661] link needs the (-) between "se" and "4661"
>
>
> Montblack
>
>

Which begs the question: did campbell ever get his license back?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Montblack

December 16th 06, 06:59 AM

("John Ousterhout" wrote)
> YOU NICKING FUTPICKER! My wife the Grammar Nazi supplies all the nicking
> futpicking that I can stand, thank you very much.

I'm telling Stella you called her a Grammar Nazi without offsetting it with
commas!

Um, ...you also called Margene a man. (>Dear Mr. Black)

You're on your own with that one, pal.

Mont
Feet up - typing away. Dr.'s orders! :-)

DABEAR

December 16th 06, 08:42 AM

<snipped>

Some things not included in the FAI's categories:

1.) Magic

2.) Stunts

3.) Lies

The rocket racing league is shooting themselves in the foot here, big
time.

Al G

They might have to add the Magic Category for Campbell as the "World's
Slowest Disappearing Act" ~ Thirty Years of criminal misconduct and
this clown is still loose on Society.

DABEAR

December 16th 06, 09:05 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> Sorry, but that's wrong too. A record is a record if you document it to a
> sufficient level that it can be verified. Whether or not the person chooses
> to submit it to the FAI does not change that. An "FAI Record" is only such
> if it is recognized by the FAI. Two different statements.

Nonsense!

Based on what you've just claimed, and considering the liars and frauds
that Jim Campbell hangs with, associates with, does business with and
attacks others with, he can sit in his office, get his friends
together, and set speed and altitude records from his chair behind his
desk and they'll happily verify those records for him because
"cheating" and "fraud" are what Campbell and his
friends/associates/business partners are all about, particularly in the
RRL. and at the Reno "Invitational" National Championship Air Races.

That's why we have the FAI and the NAA, among others...to prevent
cheating by prissy little schoolgirls like Campbell, with the FAI and
the NAA primarily serving to document with recording equipment, timing,
trained officials, and public event witnesses, all legitimate record
attempts, then to "certify" the record on behalf of the World and/or
the United States. It all boils down to a matter of trust between
countries, just like it boils down to trust between individuals and
groups, and any Group that backs Jim Campbell is suspect, because Jim
Campbell is a liar and a skunk of the lowest order (or odor, if you
prefer...), and no record claim by him not monitored by the FAI or the
NAA is worth the notepad he's written his claims on.

We have these groups specifically to verify and certify records, and
only recognize those records monitored by these groups because they
(FAI/NAA) can be trusted, overseen, and beyond that, exist because
liars and frauds like Jim Campbell exist in Aviation, and for that
matter, Journalism. That's their whole purpose...to thwart false
claims that undermine legitimate claims by others to the records they
hold. It's like Campbell claiming he's a "Vietnam Veteran." According
to what the US Air Force says, he didn't last but something like six
months, and never stepped foot in Vietnam.

Also, submitting records to the FAI after the fact, without the FAI
being present for the event, to monitor, oversee, verify and certify
the event...that's no record. That's a waste of time that will only be
recognized as such. Campbell's records are about as notable as
Campbell lighting one of his farts...

Campbell claims to be a "Vietnam Veteran," takes away from those who
served and are legitimate Vietnam Veterans. Campbell claiming to have
set records in Aerospace that he has not, takes away from those who
hold the records legitimately.

Campbell is nothing more than a fraud, a liar, along the lines of the
individual who ran into the Olympic Stadium in Los Angeles, claiming
victory in the Marathon, though he hadn't run the 26 miles, and though
the guy immediately behind him did and was the actual winner. Confused
the crowd, and caused that fraud to steal the applause, the laurels and
the glory, from the victor. From the true champion.

Campbell is lying filth and needs out of Aviation and Journalism. He
needs to be in a Federal Penitentiary for all the criminal misconduct
he has committed against others.

His day is coming, mark my words on that!

DABEAR

December 16th 06, 09:06 AM

DABEAR

December 16th 06, 09:24 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> Go ask Jim. That is, assuming you can muster the cojones to do so, given no
> one else around seems to have any when it comes to going to the source. All
> bark, no bite.

The last time somebody went to the source, the source was last seen
running "DOWN" the "UP" elevator, cowardly piece of filth that he is.
There are numerous records of confrontations being attempted to get
explanation from the source ~ from the Horse's Ass, if you will ~ but
Jimbo the Rocket Clown loves nothing more than to run.

It's your friend the pendejo that has no cojones, only running shoes
and fast ones at that. I'm surprised he hasn't claimed the records of
Jim Thorpe or Jesse Owens at this point. When it comes to the Rocket
Racer he's going to fly, I suspect it won't be a velocity, but a rocket
powered Nike of enormous proportions. In fact, was he just in Manitou
Springs, Colorado? They had a coffin race here with one dressed up as
a Rocket Ship with .50 caliber machine guns. I thought it might have
been Zoom's and was saddened not to find him in it, lying vertically
and holding Lillies, of course. That flower would go very well with
his liver...not to mention a nice Chianti and some Fava
beans...slurp...slurp...slurp.

But that's all right...someone's going to get to the source real soon.
He's got a lot to answer for, but when it comes to good reasons or good
excuses, or even bad ones, he's going to be empty-handed when it comes
to Lawful Right.

When you finally find him in the pit of quicksand he's made for
himself, do me a favor ~ do us all a favor ~ hand him an anvil or a
cannon ball. Try and make it quick. We don't care if "quick" equates
to "painless" for Jimbo the Glory Slut...we just want him gone.

And whatever you do, don't make the mistake of stepping into the
quicksand with him. It's not too late...despite your comments.

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 16th 06, 01:36 PM

"Dan" > wrote in message
...
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> "Dan" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>>> "DABEAR" > wrote in message
>>>> oups.com...
>>>>> <snipped>
>>>>>
>>>>>> FWIW, I don't recall Zoom claiming his 'record' was recognized by
>>>>>> anyone.
>>>>> Then it's not a record.
>>>> Sorry, but that's wrong too. A record is a record if you document it to
>>>> a
>>>> sufficient level that it can be verified. Whether or not the person
>>>> chooses to submit it to the FAI does not change that. An "FAI Record"
>>>> is
>>>> only such if it is recognized by the FAI. Two different statements.
>>>>
>>> The problem is cambell provides no disinterested documentation.
>>
>> Sorry, but no. Wrong answer.
>>
>> Have you asked him? Never mind, I already know the answer.
>>
>> The simple, incontrovertible fact is that you have no evidence to reach
>> such
>> a conclusion. No one here does.
>>
> He hasn't yet provided proof in any publication.

As I said here, no one here appears to have the balls to simply go up to him
and ask him. Pathetic. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 16th 06, 01:37 PM

"BobR" > wrote in message
s.com...
> It is a very simple concept, if you claim a WORLD RECORD which is what
> Cambell clearly stated in the bio, it should be verifiable by a
> recognized World Athority.

There's another simple concept -- opinions are like anuses, everyone has one
and in the case of the RAH Gaggle, they all stink.

BTW, when did the NAA or FAI start keeping track of microlight records?

>
>
> Dan wrote:
>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> > "Dan" > wrote in message
>> > ...
>> >> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> >>> "DABEAR" > wrote in message
>> >>> oups.com...
>> >>>> <snipped>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> FWIW, I don't recall Zoom claiming his 'record' was recognized by
>> >>>>> anyone.
>> >>>> Then it's not a record.
>> >>> Sorry, but that's wrong too. A record is a record if you document it
>> >>> to a
>> >>> sufficient level that it can be verified. Whether or not the person
>> >>> chooses to submit it to the FAI does not change that. An "FAI Record"
>> >>> is
>> >>> only such if it is recognized by the FAI. Two different statements.
>> >>>
>> >> The problem is cambell provides no disinterested documentation.
>> >
>> > Sorry, but no. Wrong answer.
>> >
>> > Have you asked him? Never mind, I already know the answer.
>> >
>> > The simple, incontrovertible fact is that you have no evidence to reach
>> > such
>> > a conclusion. No one here does.
>> >
>> He hasn't yet provided proof in any publication. If you have such
>> proof provide it. As for asking him, why should I? It's up to him to
>> provide proof especially since he's on record about lying about other
>> accomplishments.
>>
>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 16th 06, 01:38 PM

"Dan" > wrote in message
...
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> "Dan" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>>> "Dan" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>>>>> http://www.aero-news.net/news/featurestories.cfm?ContentBlockID=816716A9-6B8C-4352-B653-17ABA431B643&Dynamic=1
>>>>>>
>>>>> Gee, he lost his chase plane according to your cite. No witnesses
>>>>> no
>>>>> record.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>>>> Still trying to prove intelligence? Notice the word "barograph" in the
>>>> article? <chuckle> Get over it.
>>> Yawn, is there an unbiased party who who verified calibration of said
>>> barograph, sealed said barograph, placed said barograph in the aircraft
>>> and verified that said barograph remained sealed with its original seal
>>> and verified the maximum altitude upon completion of the attempt?
>>
>> Go ask Jim. That is, assuming you can muster the cojones to do so, given
>> no
>> one else around seems to have any when it comes to going to the source.
>> All
>> bark, no bite.
>>
>>> My point is he made a claim and has yet to prove it. If he wants to be
>>> taken seriously on this point he should have submitted it to a
>>> controlling
>>> authority. It really isn't that difficult to understand.
>>
>> I don't think he really gives a damn what anyone else here thinks of what
>> he
>> did or didn't do, Dan. If you haven't figured that out yet, here's your
>> chance.
>>
>> Juan
>>
> As a publisher he should care what people think of him.

Perhaps he doesn't care what YOU think. :)

> On the other hand you criticize people who question his claims without
> providing any proof of your own.

What makes you think I care what you think about what I post here, Dan?

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 16th 06, 01:42 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>> Go ask Jim. That is, assuming you can muster the cojones to do so, given
>> no
>> one else around seems to have any when it comes to going to the source.
>> All
>> bark, no bite.
>
> The last time somebody went to the source, the source was last seen
> running "DOWN" the "UP" elevator, cowardly piece of filth that he is.

Oh, please, take your prepubescent postings somewhere else. Last time I saw
someone go up to "the source" there were plenty of people around Campbell
and most of them have more aviation experience in their pinkies than you can
muster in your lifetime, Mark. I happened to be with him at the XPrize Cup.
Where were you? Toilet?

<mercy snip>

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 16th 06, 01:43 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>
>> Sorry, but that's wrong too. A record is a record if you document it to a
>> sufficient level that it can be verified. Whether or not the person
>> chooses
>> to submit it to the FAI does not change that. An "FAI Record" is only
>> such
>> if it is recognized by the FAI. Two different statements.
>
> Nonsense!

Your opinion has been noted.

<mercy snip>

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 16th 06, 01:44 PM

"John Ousterhout" > wrote in message
news:3VLgh.1098499$084.800306@attbi_s22...
> Montblack wrote:
>> Page not found
>> The page you are looking for might have been removed,
>> had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable.
>>
>> HTTP 404 - File not found
>
> Dear Mr. Black
>
> Thank you for your valuable feedback. Your comments have been noted and
> the deficiencies identified have been corrected.
>
> YOU NICKING FUTPICKER! My wife the Grammar Nazi supplies all the nicking
> futpicking that I can stand, thank you very much.
>
> Sincerely yours
> J. Ousterhout,
> Webmonster - http://www.ousterhout.net
> rah/14, EAA, AOPA, OPA, FAA, FFA, EIEIO

Why does this idiotic little tantrum not surprise me? :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 16th 06, 01:55 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> <snipped>
>
> Some things not included in the FAI's categories:

<mercy snipped>

Any aviation-related records on issues such as:

- size
- weight
- capacity
- feats of strength associated with or performed with aircraft
- repetition records associated with aircraft
- anything not covered by FAI categories but clearly aviation-related

Next!

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Dan[_2_]

December 16th 06, 02:29 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> "Dan" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>> "Dan" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>>>> "DABEAR" > wrote in message
>>>>> oups.com...
>>>>>> <snipped>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> FWIW, I don't recall Zoom claiming his 'record' was recognized by
>>>>>>> anyone.
>>>>>> Then it's not a record.
>>>>> Sorry, but that's wrong too. A record is a record if you document it to
>>>>> a
>>>>> sufficient level that it can be verified. Whether or not the person
>>>>> chooses to submit it to the FAI does not change that. An "FAI Record"
>>>>> is
>>>>> only such if it is recognized by the FAI. Two different statements.
>>>>>
>>>> The problem is cambell provides no disinterested documentation.
>>> Sorry, but no. Wrong answer.
>>>
>>> Have you asked him? Never mind, I already know the answer.
>>>
>>> The simple, incontrovertible fact is that you have no evidence to reach
>>> such
>>> a conclusion. No one here does.
>>>
>> He hasn't yet provided proof in any publication.
>
> As I said here, no one here appears to have the balls to simply go up to him
> and ask him. Pathetic. :)

No one should have to.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Dan[_2_]

December 16th 06, 02:30 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> "BobR" > wrote in message
> s.com...
>> It is a very simple concept, if you claim a WORLD RECORD which is what
>> Cambell clearly stated in the bio, it should be verifiable by a
>> recognized World Athority.
>
> There's another simple concept -- opinions are like anuses, everyone has one
> and in the case of the RAH Gaggle, they all stink.
>
Yours included.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Dan[_2_]

December 16th 06, 02:31 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> "Dan" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>> "Dan" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>>>> "Dan" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>>>>>> http://www.aero-news.net/news/featurestories.cfm?ContentBlockID=816716A9-6B8C-4352-B653-17ABA431B643&Dynamic=1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gee, he lost his chase plane according to your cite. No witnesses
>>>>>> no
>>>>>> record.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>>>>> Still trying to prove intelligence? Notice the word "barograph" in the
>>>>> article? <chuckle> Get over it.
>>>> Yawn, is there an unbiased party who who verified calibration of said
>>>> barograph, sealed said barograph, placed said barograph in the aircraft
>>>> and verified that said barograph remained sealed with its original seal
>>>> and verified the maximum altitude upon completion of the attempt?
>>> Go ask Jim. That is, assuming you can muster the cojones to do so, given
>>> no
>>> one else around seems to have any when it comes to going to the source.
>>> All
>>> bark, no bite.
>>>
>>>> My point is he made a claim and has yet to prove it. If he wants to be
>>>> taken seriously on this point he should have submitted it to a
>>>> controlling
>>>> authority. It really isn't that difficult to understand.
>>> I don't think he really gives a damn what anyone else here thinks of what
>>> he
>>> did or didn't do, Dan. If you haven't figured that out yet, here's your
>>> chance.
>>>
>>> Juan
>>>
>> As a publisher he should care what people think of him.
>
> Perhaps he doesn't care what YOU think. :)
>
>> On the other hand you criticize people who question his claims without
>> providing any proof of your own.
>
> What makes you think I care what you think about what I post here, Dan?
>
You keep piping up.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Dan[_2_]

December 16th 06, 02:46 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:
<snip>
>
> As I said here, no one here appears to have the balls to simply go up to him
> and ask him. Pathetic. :)

Why bother? He lied about the record once, he will only do it again.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 16th 06, 02:50 PM

"Dan" > wrote in message
...
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> "BobR" > wrote in message
>> s.com...
>>> It is a very simple concept, if you claim a WORLD RECORD which is what
>>> Cambell clearly stated in the bio, it should be verifiable by a
>>> recognized World Athority.
>>
>> There's another simple concept -- opinions are like anuses, everyone has
>> one and in the case of the RAH Gaggle, they all stink.
>>
> Yours included.

You're the one making opinions. Ring a bell? :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 16th 06, 02:51 PM

"Dan" > wrote in message
...
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> "Dan" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>>> "Dan" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>>>>> "Dan" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>>>>>>> http://www.aero-news.net/news/featurestories.cfm?ContentBlockID=816716A9-6B8C-4352-B653-17ABA431B643&Dynamic=1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gee, he lost his chase plane according to your cite. No
>>>>>>> witnesses no
>>>>>>> record.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>>>>>> Still trying to prove intelligence? Notice the word "barograph" in
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> article? <chuckle> Get over it.
>>>>> Yawn, is there an unbiased party who who verified calibration of
>>>>> said
>>>>> barograph, sealed said barograph, placed said barograph in the
>>>>> aircraft
>>>>> and verified that said barograph remained sealed with its original
>>>>> seal
>>>>> and verified the maximum altitude upon completion of the attempt?
>>>> Go ask Jim. That is, assuming you can muster the cojones to do so,
>>>> given no
>>>> one else around seems to have any when it comes to going to the source.
>>>> All
>>>> bark, no bite.
>>>>
>>>>> My point is he made a claim and has yet to prove it. If he wants to be
>>>>> taken seriously on this point he should have submitted it to a
>>>>> controlling
>>>>> authority. It really isn't that difficult to understand.
>>>> I don't think he really gives a damn what anyone else here thinks of
>>>> what he
>>>> did or didn't do, Dan. If you haven't figured that out yet, here's your
>>>> chance.
>>>>
>>>> Juan
>>>>
>>> As a publisher he should care what people think of him.
>>
>> Perhaps he doesn't care what YOU think. :)
>>
>>> On the other hand you criticize people who question his claims without
>>> providing any proof of your own.
>>
>> What makes you think I care what you think about what I post here, Dan?
>>
> You keep piping up.

As opposed to the gaggle coming out from under the rock every once in a
while and getting its nuts squashed, then forced to slime back under the
rock? :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 16th 06, 02:52 PM

"Dan" > wrote in message
...
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> "Dan" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>>> "Dan" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>>>>> "DABEAR" > wrote in message
>>>>>> oups.com...
>>>>>>> <snipped>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> FWIW, I don't recall Zoom claiming his 'record' was recognized by
>>>>>>>> anyone.
>>>>>>> Then it's not a record.
>>>>>> Sorry, but that's wrong too. A record is a record if you document it
>>>>>> to a
>>>>>> sufficient level that it can be verified. Whether or not the person
>>>>>> chooses to submit it to the FAI does not change that. An "FAI Record"
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> only such if it is recognized by the FAI. Two different statements.
>>>>>>
>>>>> The problem is cambell provides no disinterested documentation.
>>>> Sorry, but no. Wrong answer.
>>>>
>>>> Have you asked him? Never mind, I already know the answer.
>>>>
>>>> The simple, incontrovertible fact is that you have no evidence to reach
>>>> such
>>>> a conclusion. No one here does.
>>>>
>>> He hasn't yet provided proof in any publication.
>>
>> As I said here, no one here appears to have the balls to simply go up to
>> him and ask him. Pathetic. :)
>
> No one should have to.

As I said, no one here has the balls. All bark, no bite. Why post the issue
here, rather than asking him about it? You people are pathetic.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 16th 06, 02:53 PM

"Dan" > wrote in message
...
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
> <snip>
>>
>> As I said here, no one here appears to have the balls to simply go up to
>> him and ask him. Pathetic. :)
>
> Why bother? He lied about the record once, he will only do it again.

As I said, you people are pathetic. When confronted with a simple solution
that requires gonads, you slime and slink away with all sorts of excuses.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Harry K

December 16th 06, 03:04 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> "Dan" > wrote in message
> ...
> > Juan Jimenez wrote:
> > <snip>
> >>
> >> As I said here, no one here appears to have the balls to simply go up to
> >> him and ask him. Pathetic. :)
> >
> > Why bother? He lied about the record once, he will only do it again.
>
> As I said, you people are pathetic. When confronted with a simple solution
> that requires gonads, you slime and slink away with all sorts of excuses.
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

So why don't _you_ ask him and post the reply here? We can all use a
laugh.

Harry K

Dan[_2_]

December 16th 06, 03:08 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> "Dan" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> <snip>
>>> As I said here, no one here appears to have the balls to simply go up to
>>> him and ask him. Pathetic. :)
>> Why bother? He lied about the record once, he will only do it again.
>
> As I said, you people are pathetic. When confronted with a simple solution
> that requires gonads, you slime and slink away with all sorts of excuses.
>
>
>
OK, suppose I go up to him, ask him if he can prove his claim and he
tells me he can't or doesn't have to will that make you happy? The fact
remains he's a proven liar. You know it and I know it. For the record I
intend to ask him about some of his claims when I meet him.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Harry K

December 16th 06, 03:09 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> "Al G" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
> > .. .
> >> The NAA has some aviation-related records that FAI doesn't keep track of.
> >> Guinness World Records has others as well. That's easy to verify.
> >>
> >
> > Ok, Juan, I did.
> >
> > James Campbell holds NO World records.
> > He holds NO National Records.
> > He is a confirmed Liar.
>
> Your opinion has been noted. <shrug>
>
>

Looks to me, and anyone capable of reading, like a statement of fact,
not an opinion. YOu know, "fact" as in something that can be verified.

Harry K

Dan[_2_]

December 16th 06, 03:09 PM

Harry K wrote:
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> "Dan" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>>> As I said here, no one here appears to have the balls to simply go up to
>>>> him and ask him. Pathetic. :)
>>> Why bother? He lied about the record once, he will only do it again.
>> As I said, you people are pathetic. When confronted with a simple solution
>> that requires gonads, you slime and slink away with all sorts of excuses.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>
> So why don't _you_ ask him and post the reply here? We can all use a
> laugh.
>
> Harry K
>
Are you kidding? If campbell ever breaks wind yawn is going to get
wind burn on his face.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

John Ammeter

December 16th 06, 04:26 PM

I'm sure it would have to be a very small wager.... otherwise it might
fall off...

DABEAR wrote:
> DABEAR wrote:
>
>>>>All it takes is a little prick.
>>>>
>>>>Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>>>
>>>And _that_ I am sure he can supply.
>>>
>>>Harry K
>
>
> I was laughing so hard at this one I hit send by mistake!
>
> I was going to say ~ would you care to place a wager on that!?
>

DABEAR

December 16th 06, 06:59 PM

> Oh, please, take your prepubescent postings somewhere else. Last time I saw
> someone go up to "the source" there were plenty of people around Campbell
> and most of them have more aviation experience in their pinkies than you can
> muster in your lifetime, Mark. I happened to be with him at the XPrize Cup.
> Where were you? Toilet?

Flame ON

Well, then you're making a fool out of yourself because there is no
escalator at the X Prize facility in Mojave, if that's the one your
referring to. The incidents I referred to occurred in a Florida Mall,
Oshkosh and Sun 'N Fun.

I was also at the X Prize in Mojave...glad I didn't see you there
because I can handle just so much ignorance and BS out of a person in
day's time.

As for prepubescent postings, coming from the Human Version of the
Penis Enlargement Pump Owned By The Biggest, Most Cowardly Liar On
Earth, I take that as high praise!

Thanks Juan!

So, what's the deal...you two were in prison together and fell in
love!? LOL!

Oh, by the way, from the information I have, Campbell makes it a point
to run to groups of people so that he has a lot of people around him
because the coward doesn't want to get his ass beat!

One of these times, that's not going to help him.

So, why don't you dribble some intelligence out of your mouth instead
of the penile effluent of Jimbo the Rocket Clown? The only
documentation you have to support your claims is yourself and no other.
Jimbo has a thirty year record of criminal misconduct posted on the
internet already that disputes everything you spew.

Put that in your BD-5J and "Smoke It!" The hard way, if you get my
drift.

Flame OFF

Oh, and as for my Aviation experience, you have no knowledge of what I
know, so how do you make an intelligent contrast between those Campbell
sucks up to in a moment of absolute terror and what my education and
experience are?

Remember, he has six months of military experience that looks like it
ended with a less than honorable discharge. I have a DD-214 that
outlines my Aviation experience, among other things, along with an
Honorable Discharge, an RE Code of 1A, and a couple of Soldier of the
Year titles with it.

Go back to your boyfriend and wait for the hammer to fall...right on
your heads. I have a bigger complaint with those aiding and abetting
Campbell and his criminal misconduct than I do with the mental
defective himself. When he drug into a Federal Court to answer all the
charges, he's going to be whimpering, crying, whining...much like you
do here...and doing his damndest to claim he's Mentally Ill and
"innocent" as a result.

He should have gotten help, or at a minimum, I'm wondering if his
friends ~ people like you ~ are really his true friends by not urging
him to seek help and get his schizophrenia under control.

Also, Juan, if you and Jim are such great Journalists, why do you
trample all over the Freedom of Speech possessed by others? I mean
seriously, "take my comments elsewhere!?" From a "Noble Journalist"
such as yourself?

The fact is I spread these comments through my internet Press sites.
You'd better believe I'm taking them elsewhere, because anything I can
do to expose Jim Campbell for the creep and fraud that he is, is a GOOD
THING! ~ but I'm still posting here!

And how is it that we should consider you omnipotent when you have no
documentation, nor even Jim Campbell backing up your claims, nor Jim
Campbell even listing you at his website anymore ~ while thirty years
of documentation, medical records, court cases and transcripts, Police
complaints, et al, fly in the face of your blatant, mornic, prissy "I'M
ALWAYS RIGHT!" behavior!!??

Oh! I'm sorry! That's Right! You were trained by Campbell!

Hey, well, what can I say!? The leash looks good on you! But the
collar's a little butch...don't ya think!?

DABEAR

December 16th 06, 07:05 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> Any aviation-related records on issues such as:
>
> - size
> - weight
> - capacity
> - feats of strength associated with or performed with aircraft
> - repetition records associated with aircraft
> - anything not covered by FAI categories but clearly aviation-related
>
> Next!

Hey, moron! You left out "Relevance!"

"Feats of Strength?" HA! He's hardly the man of steel...

But he is repititious, just like you! Like I said, he trained you,
right!? Mmmm...maybe the collar doesn't look so bad on you after all.

I mean, good Lord ~ beyond James R. Campbell, you must be the most
insane person on the face of this Earth! I think we need to check in
and see who gave you a license ~ I think that in denial, as pilots go,
you're more dangerous than Campbell! And that's saying a lot!

There is no "next" in my response ~ since you're the only assclown
defending the son of a bitch.

And I have all the time in the World to respond to your rubbish.

DABEAR

December 16th 06, 07:07 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> > YOU NICKING FUTPICKER! My wife the Grammar Nazi supplies all the nicking
> > futpicking that I can stand, thank you very much.
> >
> > Sincerely yours
> > J. Ousterhout,
> > Webmonster - http://www.ousterhout.net
> > rah/14, EAA, AOPA, OPA, FAA, FFA, EIEIO
>
> Why does this idiotic little tantrum not surprise me? :)

Perhaps it's because you're the type of "Idiot" that can't recognize
when a guy is joking!?

BTW, Juan. I'm not joking. You're an Idiot!

DABEAR

December 16th 06, 07:10 PM

Dan wrote:
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
<snipped>
> > There's another simple concept -- opinions are like anuses, everyone has one
> > and in the case of the RAH Gaggle, they all stink.
> >
> Yours included.
>
> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

No Dan, just his all by itself.

DABEAR

December 16th 06, 07:14 PM

> What makes you think I care what you think about what I post here, Dan?

You keep piping up.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

In case you haven't been keeping score: that's Dan "Juan;" to Juan's
usual "Nothing!" LOL! Multiplied by Powers of Ten in Dan's clear
favor, since if brains were dynamite, Juan wouldn't have enough to blow
his nose with!

DABEAR

December 16th 06, 07:16 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

<snip>

> As I said here, no one here appears to have the balls to simply go up to him
> and ask him. Pathetic. :)

And as you've been informed, and there's plenty of documentation here
on the internet about him, when someone attempts to go up to him, he
doesn't have the balls to stay. He runs.

That's what frauds do, Juan...because they don't want to be caught.

DABEAR

December 16th 06, 07:19 PM

Juan wrote:

As I said, no one here has the balls. All bark, no bite. Why post the
issue
here, rather than asking him about it? You people are pathetic.

You know, I'll tell you what...I will make it a point, no ~ a Crusade ~
to get the truth out of your boyfriend in person! Face to face.

That should make both of you happy...ask Jim...make sure he's happy
about this...

DABEAR

December 16th 06, 07:22 PM

Juan wrote:

<snipped>

As opposed to the gaggle coming out from under the rock every once in a

while and getting its nuts squashed, then forced to slime back under
the
rock? :)

"getting its nuts squashed" ~ is that what you're here doing with your
mouth? And you kiss Jim Campbell with that mouth!?

No wonder he's mentally defective...

DABEAR

December 16th 06, 07:29 PM

John Ammeter wrote:
> I'm sure it would have to be a very small wager.... otherwise it might
> fall off...

LOL! Would serve him right for trying to weight it down so it doesn't
blow away in the wind of the next "Microlight" record the poor fool
tries to set! You know, he might actually be capable of setting such a
record if it weren't for the fact that "Yawn" has to sit on his lap and
hold it for him so it don't fly away! ROTFLMAO!!! All they have to do
is think about it, and they can teach it to fly formation with him so
Jimbo can get rid of some dead weight in his operations! HA!!! Then
technically, he sets "multiple" records at the same time.

The question is, how would the FAI record the record: To Campbell or
to a "Prick!?"

Oh, this is too much fun...

"Yawn!" ILOL!!! (Infinite Long on Laughs!!!)

I sure miss his brother...though Yawn is the funnier of the two!

john smith

December 16th 06, 08:00 PM

According to yesterday's (Dec 15, 2006) Wall Street Journal, former
astronaut and Southwest Airlines pilot Hoot Gibson is to become the
Rocket Racing League's COO.
How long before he gives Zoom the boot?

Dan[_2_]

December 16th 06, 08:26 PM

DABEAR wrote:
<snip>
> Remember, he has six months of military experience that looks like it
> ended with a less than honorable discharge.

If he got an honourable he was probably discharged for medical
reasons. Based on one of his court cases I'd say psychiatric. One can
only hope her served less than 180 days and so got no VA education
benefits. Has anyone seen his DD-214? Back when he was in he could gave
gotten a Conditional Discharge for "behaviour incompatable with military
service" which usually referred to homosexuality. Conditionals were
supposed to be neither honourable nor less than honourable. I make no
accusations just observations.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

DABEAR

December 16th 06, 09:10 PM

Dan wrote:

> If he got an honourable he was probably discharged for medical
> reasons. Based on one of his court cases I'd say psychiatric. One can
> only hope her served less than 180 days and so got no VA education
> benefits. Has anyone seen his DD-214? Back when he was in he could gave
> gotten a Conditional Discharge for "behaviour incompatable with military
> service" which usually referred to homosexuality. Conditionals were
> supposed to be neither honourable nor less than honourable. I make no
> accusations just observations.
>
> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

No mention of the term of discharge. Back in that day, the discharges
were less than honorable, but not dishonorable, and were termed "For
the Good of the Service." Not good, not bad, just mediocre, so let him
put up his DD 214 and answer all questions.

Better yet, I'm going to take a page from Juan (Page Juan?) and ask the
sleezeball to his face...Campbell can thank Juan for that personally.

Based on his conduct during that time frame, psychiatric or not, I say
he didn't fit in and on top of that, he screwed up.

DABEAR

December 16th 06, 09:21 PM

john smith wrote:
> According to yesterday's (Dec 15, 2006) Wall Street Journal, former
> astronaut and Southwest Airlines pilot Hoot Gibson is to become the
> Rocket Racing League's COO.
> How long before he gives Zoom the boot?

This would be a good thing as Gibson would bring credibility, focus and
positive direction to that dis-organization. Plus, he's one of the
nicest guys you'll ever meet.

I've got conflicting reports indicating that Whitelaw may or may not be
headed to prison in regards to the Amber Alert nonsense. This is a guy
who apparently helps businesses cheat on their taxes using Bermuda
online business registries. Not too impressive...

Campbell would not last long under Gibson. With the safety of the
pilots his highest priority, along with the safety of the event,
Gibson's not going to allow a Campbell to come in and "go for the
kill." Gibson has never struck me as liking ass-kissers, frauds,
wannabes...just professionals.

Gibson was one of those who investigated the Challenger disaster,
beyond flying his own Shuttle missions with his crews. A former
Formula One pilot and currently Unlimited Class and Jet Class flyer.
Flew Mike Keenum's Racde 99, Riff Raff, a Hawker Sea Fury. Built his
own Formula One, Yellow Peril, Race 22, which has campaigned throughout
the U.S. and into Canada. Put on a great lecture at Flabob EAA Chapter
1 during their open house years ago, showing his work on the IF1 racer.
Absolutely beautiful wing.

The issue then becomes one of: how long will Mike Houghton (Reno
"Invitational" Air Races) last, or does he have influence over Gibson.
I don't think Gibson will tolerate Houghton's antics long, either.

Add to that, with a little luck, Gibson and Curt Brown are friends and
you could see Brown signing on in a leadership role. Would really turn
that organization around, provided they're given a hands off (them),
free hand in making positive changes.

This would be a Class move away from Fraud and in the direction of
something tangible, if it occurs. And Gibson can be approached by the
Press...he's just matter of fact.

So there may be hope for the RRL, yet...I could even see its
advertising and marketing headed in a more honest direction if Gibson
comes onboard. A GOOD man!

DABEAR

December 16th 06, 10:30 PM

This is a follow up to the Hoot Gibson story. In actuality, he'll be
joining Benson Space in their Space Tourism plan, nothing to do with
the Rocket Racing League. Benson's gain, RRL's loss. Nothing has
changed for the positive at RRL...

john smith

December 17th 06, 12:00 AM

I screwed that story up, didn't I?
I looked at the headline and skimmed the first paragraph.
Should have read the whole story!
Apologies to all.

DABEAR wrote:

>This is a follow up to the Hoot Gibson story. In actuality, he'll be
>joining Benson Space in their Space Tourism plan, nothing to do with
>the Rocket Racing League. Benson's gain, RRL's loss. Nothing has
>changed for the positive at RRL...
>
>
>

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 12:54 AM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
> Juan wrote:
>
> <snipped>
>
> As opposed to the gaggle coming out from under the rock every once in a
>
> while and getting its nuts squashed, then forced to slime back under
> the
> rock? :)
>
> "getting its nuts squashed" ~ is that what you're here doing with your
> mouth? And you kiss Jim Campbell with that mouth!?
>
> No wonder he's mentally defective...

I'll give that... umm... 0.3 on a scale of one to 10. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 12:55 AM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
oups.com...
> Juan wrote:
>
> As I said, no one here has the balls. All bark, no bite. Why post the
> issue
> here, rather than asking him about it? You people are pathetic.
>
> You know, I'll tell you what...I will make it a point, no ~ a Crusade ~
> to get the truth out of your boyfriend in person! Face to face.

Sure you will. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 12:56 AM

"Harry K" > wrote in message
ps.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> "Dan" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> > <snip>
>> >>
>> >> As I said here, no one here appears to have the balls to simply go up
>> >> to
>> >> him and ask him. Pathetic. :)
>> >
>> > Why bother? He lied about the record once, he will only do it again.
>>
>> As I said, you people are pathetic. When confronted with a simple
>> solution
>> that requires gonads, you slime and slink away with all sorts of excuses.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>
> So why don't _you_ ask him and post the reply here? We can all use a
> laugh.

Of course you all can use a laugh, after all that running at the mouth. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 12:57 AM

"Dan" > wrote in message
...
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> "Dan" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>>> As I said here, no one here appears to have the balls to simply go up
>>>> to him and ask him. Pathetic. :)
>>> Why bother? He lied about the record once, he will only do it again.
>>
>> As I said, you people are pathetic. When confronted with a simple
>> solution that requires gonads, you slime and slink away with all sorts of
>> excuses.
> OK, suppose I go up to him, ask him if he can prove his claim and he
> tells me he can't or doesn't have to will that make you happy?

Dan, I told you, I don't _care_ what you think about Jim or what will make
you or anyone else happy. I simply pointed out the fact not one you has the
balls to go up and ask him about this.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 01:02 AM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
>
>> Oh, please, take your prepubescent postings somewhere else. Last time I
>> saw
>> someone go up to "the source" there were plenty of people around Campbell
>> and most of them have more aviation experience in their pinkies than you
>> can
>> muster in your lifetime, Mark. I happened to be with him at the XPrize
>> Cup.
>> Where were you? Toilet?
>
> Flame ON

Careful, you might get burned. :)

> Well, then you're making a fool out of yourself because there is no
> escalator at the X Prize facility in Mojave, if that's the one your
> referring to. The incidents I referred to occurred in a Florida Mall,
> Oshkosh and Sun 'N Fun.

You're not a comedian either. Keep your day job. :)

> I was also at the X Prize in Mojave...glad I didn't see you there
> because I can handle just so much ignorance and BS out of a person in
> day's time.

Sorry to hear you're so pitifully misinformed. XPrize Cup <> Mojave. Bring
some more quarters the next time. :)

<mercy snip>

> Oh, and as for my Aviation experience, you have no knowledge of what I
> know, so how do you make an intelligent contrast between those Campbell
> sucks up to in a moment of absolute terror and what my education and
> experience are?

Doesn't take a genius to get the picture from your postings. :)

<making a note: Mark here goes ape**** when someone reminds him of his
aviation "experience".>

Remember Mark, running an aviation picture web site doesn't count as
aviation experience. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 01:05 AM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ps.com...
>
> And as you've been informed, and there's plenty of documentation here
> on the internet about him, when someone attempts to go up to him, he
> doesn't have the balls to stay. He runs.

That's what they said about his waltzing right into Sun-N-Fun as well. Not
only did he prove the rah gaggle was as clueless as usual, both general
media in print and tv covered him when he proved everyone wrong.

Keep running at the mouth with your knowledge of facts, sonny. You're
batting close to zero already. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 01:05 AM

"Harry K" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> "Al G" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
>> > .. .
>> >> The NAA has some aviation-related records that FAI doesn't keep track
>> >> of.
>> >> Guinness World Records has others as well. That's easy to verify.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Ok, Juan, I did.
>> >
>> > James Campbell holds NO World records.
>> > He holds NO National Records.
>> > He is a confirmed Liar.
>>
>> Your opinion has been noted. <shrug>
>>
> Looks to me, and anyone capable of reading, like a statement of fact,
> not an opinion. YOu know, "fact" as in something that can be verified.

Your opinion has been noted as well. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 01:06 AM

"Mike Hogan" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 09:55:53 -0400, "Juan Jimenez" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"DABEAR" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>>>
>>> <snipped>
>>>
>>> Some things not included in the FAI's categories:
>>
>><mercy snipped>
>>
>>Any aviation-related records on issues such as:
>>
>>- size
>>- weight
>>- capacity
>>- feats of strength associated with or performed with aircraft
>>- repetition records associated with aircraft
>>- anything not covered by FAI categories but clearly aviation-related
>
> Mr. Jimenez, does any orgaization, anwhere, not controlled by Mr.
> Campbell, recognize Mr. Campbell's record as a current or past record?
> It's a simple question.

Go ask Mr. Campbell, Mike. Why come to me when you can go to the source? :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 01:07 AM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>> Any aviation-related records on issues such as:
>>
>> - size
>> - weight
>> - capacity
>> - feats of strength associated with or performed with aircraft
>> - repetition records associated with aircraft
>> - anything not covered by FAI categories but clearly aviation-related
>>
>> Next!
>
> Hey, moron! You left out "Relevance!"

What would you know about relevance, sonny? "Aviation-related". It's just
two words! Which one is giving you problems? Even a twit like you ought to
be able to figure that one out. :)

As I said, putz, the statement that FAI is the repository of all
"aviation-related" records is wrong. Period.

Next!

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 01:09 AM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>> > YOU NICKING FUTPICKER! My wife the Grammar Nazi supplies all the
>> > nicking
>> > futpicking that I can stand, thank you very much.
>> >
>> > Sincerely yours
>> > J. Ousterhout,
>> > Webmonster - http://www.ousterhout.net
>> > rah/14, EAA, AOPA, OPA, FAA, FFA, EIEIO
>>
>> Why does this idiotic little tantrum not surprise me? :)
>
> Perhaps it's because you're the type of "Idiot" that can't recognize
> when a guy is joking!?
>
> BTW, Juan. I'm not joking. You're an Idiot!

Is there a gibberish translator in the house? I can't make head nor nail of
that uber-babble you flung onto the screen during your latest spasmodic
seizure. In future, kindly proofread your posts before assaulting
unsuspecting readers of this message board with a litany of misspellings,
egregious grammatical errors, and other verbal atrocities.

Thanks for your contribution, but if I had wanted to hear from somebody with
your IQ, I'd be at my local supermarket talking to the vegetables. It's
truly amazing the way you never let an idea interrupt the flow of your
typing, but then, making sense isn't your area of expertise, is it? A long
period of non-posting would be most welcome on your part. Oh well, as the
late Douglas Adams said: "You live and learn. At any rate, you live."

You light up a room when you leave it. No doubt your life is so dull, that
you can actually write your diary one week in advance. I'd get more pleasure
from running my nostrils down a cactus, than reading another contribution
from you. Maybe you wouldn't be such a Jerk-In-The-Box if you didn't eat all
those paint chips and lead pencils when you were a kid; if your weren't so
fat that when you stand on the weighing scale, it reads: "Sorry, we don't
weigh livestock.", or if you didn't have a face that would give Freddie
Kruger nightmares. No, come to think of it, you would.

In conclusion, thank you. We were all refreshed and challenged by your
unique point of view. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

DABEAR

December 17th 06, 01:33 AM

john smith wrote:
> I screwed that story up, didn't I?

Nooooooo. Happens to the best of us.

Besides, if you want to read some really screwed up stories, try...

....wait for it...

Aero-News.Scam!

Now, just FYI, I found a great story on Hoot Gibson and am having a few
laughs with it...Hoot, whom I do not know personally, but whom I've
met, photographed and actually did some air to air work with, is a
great guy, so it was fun coming across this particular story:

http://www.gibson.com/Products/Places/Repair/Repair%20Stories/What%20a%20hoot_%20A%20chat%20with%20astro/

I'm glad you posted...I did some research on the Benson Space piece and
stumbled across the url'd story above. My headline with links is:

~~~~~~~~~~

"Editor's Choice

Extra!!! Extra!!! Extra!!!

Exclusive Link That Will Reveal All ~ Click Here For:

(Teaser 1) The Sensational Secret Life of Astronaut Robert L. "Hoot"
Gibson!!!

Exclusive Link That Will Reveal All ~ Click Here For:

(Teaser 2) "Everything You Ever Wanted To Know About "Hoot" Gibson But
Were Afraid To Ask!"

"You're Going to Thank Me! Hoot isn't...but you are!"

~ Ed."

~~~~~~~~~~

So, hell, yours was a great post for me!

Hey! Are we having fun yet!?

DABEAR

December 17th 06, 01:39 AM

Yawn wrote:

As I said, putz, the statement that FAI is the repository of all
"aviation-related" records is wrong. Period.

I think you're backpeddaling, Yawn. My argument, along with others, is
in regards to whom should be certifying records and why. Cheats like
Jim Campbell, supported by your arguments, could claim just about
anything without the FAI or the NAA around.

In fact, it's clear that's exactly what he's trying to pull...claim
records in categories that don't even exist except in the mind of a
legend in his own mind.

Nice try, Yawn...but this time, you backpeddaled into your own sword
and just lost the argument. You should have stuck with what you didn't
know...LOL!

DABEAR

December 17th 06, 01:42 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

>
> Is there a gibberish translator in the house?

Won't help in your case...but hey, that cactus idea was a pretty good
one!

Let me know if you need any assistance...LOL!

Getting your buttons pushed tonight, ain't ya Yawn!?

DABEAR

December 17th 06, 01:45 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> > You know, I'll tell you what...I will make it a point, no ~ a Crusade ~
> > to get the truth out of your boyfriend in person! Face to face.
>
> Sure you will. :)

Bank on it...I'll make sure to bring some friends with me. Cut your
cowardly friend off at the top and bottom of the escalator the next
time! Then we'll all see what he's got to say...

You see, the beauty of it is...he always advertises his appearances in
advance. Not that you can't smell him coming...you in particular.

Dan[_2_]

December 17th 06, 02:23 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> "Dan" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>> "Dan" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>>> <snip>
>>>>> As I said here, no one here appears to have the balls to simply go up
>>>>> to him and ask him. Pathetic. :)
>>>> Why bother? He lied about the record once, he will only do it again.
>>> As I said, you people are pathetic. When confronted with a simple
>>> solution that requires gonads, you slime and slink away with all sorts of
>>> excuses.
>> OK, suppose I go up to him, ask him if he can prove his claim and he
>> tells me he can't or doesn't have to will that make you happy?
>
> Dan, I told you, I don't _care_ what you think about Jim or what will make
> you or anyone else happy. I simply pointed out the fact not one you has the
> balls to go up and ask him about this.
>
>
>
>
You lie, if you didn't care you wouldn't respond to me. I have no
problem going up to him and asking, I just don't plan on making a
special trip to do so unless you or he pays for it. He won't respond to
my e-mails. Besides, he will lie to my face if I ever meet him just as
you have lied to me. Be confident that I will ask him if out paths ever
cross.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Dan[_2_]

December 17th 06, 02:28 AM

DABEAR wrote:
> john smith wrote:
>> I screwed that story up, didn't I?
>
>
> Nooooooo. Happens to the best of us.
>
> Besides, if you want to read some really screwed up stories, try...
>
> ...wait for it...
>
>
>
>
> Aero-News.Scam!
>
Or yawn's "reporting" on what really happened at S'n'F.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

>
>
>
>
> Now, just FYI, I found a great story on Hoot Gibson and am having a few
> laughs with it...Hoot, whom I do not know personally, but whom I've
> met, photographed and actually did some air to air work with, is a
> great guy, so it was fun coming across this particular story:
>
> http://www.gibson.com/Products/Places/Repair/Repair%20Stories/What%20a%20hoot_%20A%20chat%20with%20astro/
>
>
> I'm glad you posted...I did some research on the Benson Space piece and
> stumbled across the url'd story above. My headline with links is:
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~
>
> "Editor's Choice
>
> Extra!!! Extra!!! Extra!!!
>
> Exclusive Link That Will Reveal All ~ Click Here For:
>
> (Teaser 1) The Sensational Secret Life of Astronaut Robert L. "Hoot"
> Gibson!!!
>
> Exclusive Link That Will Reveal All ~ Click Here For:
>
> (Teaser 2) "Everything You Ever Wanted To Know About "Hoot" Gibson But
> Were Afraid To Ask!"
>
> "You're Going to Thank Me! Hoot isn't...but you are!"
>
> ~ Ed."
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~
>
> So, hell, yours was a great post for me!
>
> Hey! Are we having fun yet!?
>

Dan[_2_]

December 17th 06, 02:31 AM

DABEAR wrote:
> Yawn wrote:
>
> As I said, putz, the statement that FAI is the repository of all
> "aviation-related" records is wrong. Period.
>
>
> I think you're backpeddaling, Yawn. My argument, along with others, is
> in regards to whom should be certifying records and why. Cheats like
> Jim Campbell, supported by your arguments, could claim just about
> anything without the FAI or the NAA around.
>
> In fact, it's clear that's exactly what he's trying to pull...claim
> records in categories that don't even exist except in the mind of a
> legend in his own mind.
>
> Nice try, Yawn...but this time, you backpeddaled into your own sword
> and just lost the argument. You should have stuck with what you didn't
> know...LOL!
>
By yawn's "logic" if you write down (somewhere, anywhere) that you
have set a record then you have. That means campbell can write he flew a
B-17D to 50 kilofeet it's a record, true or not, since it has been recorded.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

DABEAR

December 17th 06, 02:35 AM

Yawn wrote:

>Sorry to hear you're so pitifully misinformed. XPrize Cup <> Mojave. Bring
>some more quarters the next time. :)

Why? Can't you afford to pay for your own rides?

Well, moron, sorry you missed the first launches, and as for the X
Prize Cup, Rutan wasn't launching so it wasn't worth the Editorial.

Yawn spewed:

>Doesn't take a genius to get the picture from your postings. :)

Well, at least you'll admit you're not a genius. Nor literate. Nor
much of a reader...

Yawn puked:

<making a note: Mark here goes ape**** when someone reminds him of his
aviation "experience".>

Not really...I was just laughing that you claim to be a journalist, but
here you are making comments without any research, just you or Jimbo as
the "authorities," and I wonder how you get away with calling
yourselves Journalists when you don't check your facts, you often twist
the facts, or you just downright lie. Like I said, have your boyfriend
produce his DD 214...let's see him take real pride in the fact that
he's a "Vietnam Veteran" if that be the truth...or let him take the
fall in the eyes of a nation full of Vietnam Veterans who did serve.

Let's also see him produce his logbooks to back up the claims made by
the RRL.

Further, let's have him explain his Aviation experiences as a pilot for
Japan Air Lines on Boeing 747s. Or the news article in my possession
and I believe ~ also posted on the internet ~ where he practiced
medicine without a license, prescribed pills illegally to a young woman
under his "care," and oh, how about Cerritos!?

And by GOD!!! I want his opinion on how "Ultralight" tastes!

Then, I want you to explain why a ****bird such as yourself works for
and defends an individual such as this...with all the documentation of
his thirty years of misconduct and criminal misconduct posted here on
the internet. SERIOUS criminal misconduct.

Because Yawn, quite frankly, you have no excuse. He has no excuse.
You're both a couple of scumbags and you deserve what you're both
ultimately, going to get.

Yawn weakly tried to parry:

>Remember Mark, running an aviation picture web site doesn't count as
>aviation experience. :)

We don't offer it up as Aviation Experience. If you want Aviation
Experience, you look to our backgrounds. That's the foundation of
knowledge on which we report. "Picture Websites" which are coming, are
referred to as "Photojournalism," and I would think that such a "Noble
Journalist" as yourself would know that. Unfortunately, you are not
noble, neither is Jim Campbell, nor is Aero-News.Net. You're all a
pack of two-faced hypocrites, particularly when it comes to attacking
veterans, then praising them in the same breath in your ignoble rag.

I don't think you know where you even stand on Veterans Issues, other
than if it serves you to praise them, you will for profit; if it
doesn't, you'll give guys like Dan, a retired Air Force Colonel, a hard
time here at this newsgroup.

I'm really looking forward to our first meeting. You, Jim and I...how
about that!? Are you both, by chance, familiar with the term, "Ambush
Journalism?" Ever watched Sixty Minutes, or did it have too many
pictures for you, too!?

At ILIPS Group, we're reporting news and disseminating information. If
you could read, you would know that. Thus, we have those pictures
there just for you! I'm sorry the type is so small these days, but you
of all people should know what a hellatious job it is to take
children's building blocks, and have to spell things out for you with
them. They just don't fit in the computer like they used to! Remember
when computers were big, Yawn (?)...oh, hell...look who I'm asking!
Those were before his time, little toddler that he is with his small,
toy, jet.

Besides...no one can see the pictures at Jimbo's website...and did you
miss the Red Bull article out of Australia by our correspondent there,
or Fleet Week by one of our Correspondents in California? Or how about
the F-35 story we put up in Press Release format from Lockheed? Ol'
Jimbo was backpeddaling this morning because we got that story out
before him. The only problem is, it's a PRESS RELEASE! There's no
scoop in a Press Release! What's he crying about!? He didn't get
scooped...Lockheed had the information up at their website before all
of us!

But the spy touch was cute: did you come up with some building blocks
so he could make up that "spy!?"

"WFAA-7 reports several hundred people turned out to witness the
aircraft takeoff from the Lockheed Martin facility. Accompanied by two
F-16s flying trail, the F-35's first flight is expected to last about
an hour."

"WFAA-7!?" Oh, give me a ****ing break! And what an outrageously poor
choice of acronym. We all know what FAA stands for. Hey Yawn! Does
the "W" stand for "WE!?" "We ****ed Another Aviator -7!"

Well, nice to know that the staff at Aero-News.Scam "read" us...sort
of, at least in your case. Tell them to stay tuned...we'll have some
major news ~ possibly even with pictures ~ coming soon in regards to
Jimbo the Rocket Clown and his friends. Going to be caustic to say the
least.

In one of the stories, seems Jimbo tried to cover up for his fraud in
Advertising one of his old rags, using inflated circulation figures.
When he got caught by a customer, he tried to turn the tables and take
attention off himself by accusing the customer of poor quality and
breach of contract with a few customers, and a few (hundred) other
libelous insinuations. However, the figures still stand as Jimbo
published in hard copy at that time...and Jimbo's screwd the pooch as a
result.

Then there's the Federal Perjury. Then, the Secret Service
allegations...I hear they scared him real bad! Then, stalking his wife
and fiance, then leaving a message on an answering machine after more
than half a dozen threatening messages, in which this degenerate,
domestic terrorist, whistles the theme to "Dragnet."

No wonder they call HIM psycho boy...I'm wondering what they say behind
your back for defending him so...that is, the SANE staff at Aero-News,
who should know better than to be working for Campbell.

And your name isn't even on the masthead anymore. You know what a
masthead is, right!? Has noting to do with Jim's puny member, unless
of course, you're trying to get your name on the masthead again.
That's why I figure you're hear...you ****ed him off and have to do
something spectacular on his behalf to defend him...so you can get back
on the masthead.

Unbelievable!

Hope you get around to the other websites we have online or coming up
online...hate to think you couldn't read your way past "one." Or had
to call up and borrow a line from Jim Campbell to even know whom I am
or that I have newsites and E-zines.

But that's not what matters...all that matters is that we know who you
and Jim are, what you are, what you've been up to, how each of you
profit on lies and fraud, and how you're going down in the end.

No pun intended...well, maybe.

Dan[_2_]

December 17th 06, 02:49 AM

DABEAR wrote:

<snip>

> I don't think you know where you even stand on Veterans Issues, other
> than if it serves you to praise them, you will for profit; if it
> doesn't, you'll give guys like Dan, a retired Air Force Colonel, a hard
> time here at this newsgroup.

Egad, bite your tongue, I was enlisted :) But thank you for your support.

>
> I'm really looking forward to our first meeting. You, Jim and I...how
> about that!? Are you both, by chance, familiar with the term, "Ambush
> Journalism?" Ever watched Sixty Minutes, or did it have too many
> pictures for you, too!?
>
Neither of them will meet you face to face alone and on camera. That
would take integrity and guts. If you do meet them be gentle, they are
delicate.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

BobR

December 17th 06, 02:56 AM

Like Campbell, Jaun is a legend in his own mind. He honestly believes
his pathetic replies are effective and someone actually believes
anything he says. He is about as worthless as a flea on an elephants
butt. Quit responding to the fool and just ignore him like you would
any other stupid moron. He is a total waste of your time and efforts.

DABEAR wrote:
> Juan wrote:
>
> <snipped>
>
> As opposed to the gaggle coming out from under the rock every once in a
>
> while and getting its nuts squashed, then forced to slime back under
> the
> rock? :)
>
> "getting its nuts squashed" ~ is that what you're here doing with your
> mouth? And you kiss Jim Campbell with that mouth!?
>
> No wonder he's mentally defective...

Stuart & Kathryn Fields

December 17th 06, 03:00 AM

I think all of you should write Campbell a thank you note for all of the
entertainment he has provided even if it is indirectly. As a
rec.aviation.homebuilt NG this sounds more like grade school bashing
practice. I wish there could be interesting aviation related interchanges
that focussed on a technical issue that attracted this much attention.

--
Stuart Fields
Experimental Helo magazine
P. O. Box 1585
Inyokern, CA 93527
(760) 377-4478
(760) 408-9747 general and layout cell
(760) 608-1299 technical and advertising cell

www.vkss.com
www.experimentalhelo.com

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
> > This is the updated zoom bio from the RRL web site it's a hoot!!Just for
grins
> > I'm going to contact National Geographic.Popular Science and Popular
Mechanics
> > to see if zoom ever had a published article in them. Here's where it's
at:
> >
> > www.rocketracingleague.com/bio_jim-campbell.html
> >
> >
> > Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret
> >
> > and now heeeerrreeesss the bio!!!
> >
__________________________________________________ __________________________
___
> >
> >
>
> > A commercially rated pilot, Campbell has earned Flight instructor
Ratings
> > (CFI/A/I/ME/H) in fixed and rotary wing aircraft, and logged over 17,000
flight
> > hours in over 1100 different ultralights, jets, multi-engine A/C,
helicopters,
> > gyroplanes, autogyros, sailplanes, seaplanes, kit aircraft and general
aviation
> > birds.
> > Among Campbell's many other lofty accomplishments are his 1981
Ultralight World
> > Record High Altitude flight to 21,210 feet over Lakehurst, New Jersey;
flying on
> > behalf of President Ronald Reagan as an airshow pilot during the 1981-82
Air and
> > Space Bicentennial; several years of film and TV aviation stunt work;
his 1981
> > Ultralight Flight Across America; 17 published books in the aviation
field (with
> > three more in the works for '06-'07); the first aviation journalist to
solo and
> > evaluate the awesome Russian Sukhoi SU-26 and SU-31, the FEW P-51
Mustang, the
> > Unlimited 10-300 and many other high performance aircraft. Jim was also
the
> > first fly-writer to sample and document the intriguing capabilities of
the BD-10
> > Jet, the Glasair III, the Van's RV-6 and dozens of other pivotal
aircraft.
> >
>
>
> Now, what I would like to see are his extensive logbooks documenting
> all this ****, and from there, his certificates; plus the Police Report
> on his getting shot in the leg saving the little girl, the NTSB report
> that mentions Campbell coming forward as a witness to them in the
> Cerritos Air Disaster, beyond Time Magazine, etc., etc., etc.
>
> I remember when I brought up the fact this bio ~ and this is the third
> rendition of a bio put up by/about/written by Campbell ~ indicated that
> Campbell had test flown AND evaluated something like 1100 aircraft from
> the age of thirteen. I questioned, editorially, "Who cares what a
> thirteen year old's evaluation of an aircraft is?" In California, at
> the time Campbell was thirteen, you had to be sixteen to get a license.
> The RRL removed the bio, kept it dormant, then the changes were made
> to the subsequent bio. "Test flown OR evaluated...la la la la la..."
>
> The RRL, as it is, is nothing more than a fraud. Fraud has been
> associated with a number of the people in it, including
>
> 1) the CEO, Granger Whitelaw, over the Amber Alert Portal issue in
> Arizona;
> 2) Anousheh Ansari, accused with her husband Amid, of Insider Trading
> in a stock issue in Massachusetts;
> 3) Mike Houghton, of the Reno Air Racing Association, whose fraud has
> been documented at my websites, but more importantly, at the RARA site
> www.airrace.org, which has finally pronounced (2006) itself as an
> "Invitational, Entertainment Event" versus an open to all, Motorsports
> competition, along with the fact he uses strong arm tactics and thugs
> to get his way in Reno, and has Racketeering connections to corrupt in
> Law Enforcement and business in the area;
> 4) his (Campbell's) good buddy, the Great and Magnificent Diamandis (OZ
> ~ the humbug), who despite the fact that he and his rocket scientists
> can only "envision" (L.A. Daily News) that folks might see the Rocket
> Racers at altitude because of the exhaust flame, and don't for sure
> (!), know one way or the other, and whom, along with Whitelaw, think
> they're going to change the face of Air Racing, despite having to place
> limiters on the engine throttles to keep the aircraft from coming apart
> in the hands of an agressive pilot, and who claim "Rocket Racers"
> though the competitions will be conducted after the engines are off and
> the racers in glide, sure make the concept of Rocket Racing as a
> legitimate and viable sport Highly Questionable, especially when their
> racers will max out at 300 mph and Unlimited Air Racing is currently
> capable of speeds in the 500 mph lap venue; and then
> 5) Campbell, with a thirty year documented history of mental illness
> and criminal misconduct that includes stalking, harassment, domestic
> terrorism directed against fiance and ex-wife; impersonating a doctor;
> prescribing medicines without a license; impersonating a Japan Air
> Lines Boeing 747 pilot; trying to catch ultralights in his teeth
> (Statue of Liberty, New York, with picture no less...); false
> accusations against people he's worked with at Challenge publications;
> allegations of making false statements to the Secret Service regarding
> an alleged threat against the President by one of his enemies; his
> Federal perjury which resulted in the temporary shut down of over 60 of
> my websites, something which he will soon have to owe up to, hopefully
> along with a stay in a Federal Penitentiary; his selling out as a
> "Journalist;" his failure to abide by Journalistic Rules of Conduct and
> Ethics; and on and on it goes with this clown, and the FAA and Law
> Enforcement so far, have done virtually nothing about him. They take
> away his license, then give it back to him, though he's diagnosed as a
> schizophrenic by his Grandfather, a legitimate doctor.
>
> His mental condition is known by the FAA and the NTSB and they give him
> a license that no one else possessing his absolutely insane, if not
> inane, mentality, would get ~ particularly when it comes to their own
> Air Traffic Controllers! And then pilots are supposed to have a higher
> medical standard then ATC!?
>
> And then trying to profit personally on the blood of the victims of the
> Cerritos/Aeromexico air disaster with his Time Magazine pronounciations
> of Pull UP! Pull Up! For God's Sake Pull up!
>
> His day is coming, mark my words on that. The government can carry him
> around on their backs like a sacred cow all they want ~ especially a
> sacred cow whose one religious belief they have in him surrounds him
> giving them good press and his readers believing it as "Gospel" ~ but
> enough exposure in the Press and in the Courts, and his downfall will
> be just as hard and tragic as he will make it to be.
>
> Hopefully, he won't be taking out an airliner full of people with him!
>
> This individual shouldn't be flying; he shouldn't be in Journalism; he
> should be institutionalized, preferably, in a Federal Penitentiary, and
> anyone aiding and abetting his current existence in Journalism or
> Aviation, should be sent there along with him as an Accessory to his
> crimes. Especially, his good buddies at the FAA, Aero News and the
> RRL.
>
> Period.
>
> Vietnam Veteran...bull...according to the paperwork I have, which is
> nothing new on the internet, he didn't last half a year in the Air
> Force. The Air Force won't release information on him nor why he was
> discharged so quickly. Hey Campbell...let's see your DD Form 214
> public, to include your RE code, moron!
>
> Campbell reminds me of the Leonardo DiCaprio character from "Catch Me
> If You Can." Only, he has nothing to offer that isn't already known as
> fraud and criminal misconduct that the FAA and the Law could outsmart,
> if they merely wanted to. Are prisons are full of people like him. I
> say, make room for one more!!!
>
> In fact, considering the conditions of the French Prison that held
> DiCaprio's character, I say send him to a French prison. Get his stink
> out of America, American Journalism and American Aerospace!
>
> And as for Diamandis making a Rocket Racer out of this clown ~ I think
> that holds up as the greatest proof of Diamandis' fraud, putting a
> mental defective in the cockpit of a rocket powered plane in close
> proximity to potentially hundreds of thousands of people on the
> ground...
>
> Diamandis annoints, and so be it! Someone needs to check the pilot
> selection criteria at RRL and X Prize, for that matter, and the medical
> requirements to be a Rocket Racer...they're getting a very dangerous
> start from the Government, whose head is turned away from such a sore
> subject as James R. "Captain Zoom" Cambell.
>

DABEAR

December 17th 06, 03:32 AM

Dan wrote:

> Egad, bite your tongue, I was enlisted :) But thank you for your support.

My bad...I thought I saw Colonel and should have checked it, but I'm
tired tonight and this isn't War & Peace...this is usenet!

Dan also wrote:

> Neither of them will meet you face to face alone and on camera. That
> would take integrity and guts. If you do meet them be gentle, they are
> delicate.
>
> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Delicate isn't the word I'd use. Cowards...that's a more correct word
and determination.

The way Yawn talks, I'd figure he's want a face to face confrontation.
He won't be hard to find...all I have to do is look for Campbell, check
his crotch, and Yawn will be there.

As for Campbell, he definitely has to be cornered. He's a "scaredy
cat," always has been and will ~ I believe ~ wilter like Evangelist Jim
Bakker when faced with what I've got coming for him. He'll be under
the table crying, trying on dresses, makeup, anything to look insane.

Unfortunately, he's not insane. He's had thirty years to get medical
help and has apparently avoided it, since his conduct after thirty
years is unchanged. He likes being "Mentally Ill," and figures it will
be an out at Court time if he ever gets caught.

Wrong. Mental Illness is not an excuse for crime. It might mitigate
punishment, it might be a reason for the crime, but it's no excuse, not
out of an individual who has had thirty years to get help, and more
importantly, knows "money" and has money as his motive. Money over
vengeance, even. That greed of his shows intelligence in the face of
his illness, therefore, the Courts and Prosecution will ask:

Why wasn't Jim Campbell smart enough, over a thirty year period, after
the encounters he has had with doctors; knowing his condition and
acknowledging it in court; even his family knowing his condition and
urging him to seek help; and, even as a fraud, here's Campbell still
able to run several large organizations despite his "illness..."

....why wasn't Jim Campbell smart enough to go get himself some help and
capitalize on his potential for success, if he would merely just get
some help.

Fact is, he was and is right now. Thirty years of failure to seek help
are going to be his ultimate downfall.

Insanity defense is hard to prove and mostly ignored by Courts and
Juries. Especially, where murder is not involved, but greed is. Lust
for power is. Gloryhounding is.

Campbell doesn't stand a chance. But I've got plenty on him and more
coming and I am well within time limits thanks to New Discovery.
Thanks to Campbell himself and the folks here at RAH documenting the
"Rocket Clown's" misbehavior all these years.

Those aiding and abetting Campbell are whom I'm most concerned
about...their crimes are significantly greater, because they are in
their right minds and are using this mental defective for their own
greedy purposes, manipulating him towards their own ends as they are
superior thinkers to him. He loves to be told he's a great guy...he
loves the bennies and perks...they'll tell him he's a "great guy,"
knowing, it's not true, and rather, knowing that he's a sick individual
committing crimes, but they're going to get something from him in the
end, so the "ends justifies the means."

They care less about his health than he does. They are not his true
friends.

They're the ones that should really pay, above and beyond what Campbell
must pay for, and I learned a whole helluva lot about one of them
tonight.

I was told there was a party, it was in Yawn's mouth, and everybody was
coming. How true, because boy did he spew afterwards!

And when he did, he gave away a lot about himself, his boss, Aero-News
and those they associate with.

Weak. And that's what I needed to know, though I gleaned a whole
helluva lot more just by letting him spew.

The next few months are going to be ineresting, not only in Journalism,
but in Law.

And Jimbo's time is running out...

DABEAR

December 17th 06, 03:37 AM

Morgans[_2_]

December 17th 06, 03:46 AM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> This is a follow up to the Hoot Gibson story. In actuality, he'll be
> joining Benson Space in their Space Tourism plan, nothing to do with
> the Rocket Racing League. Benson's gain, RRL's loss. Nothing has
> changed for the positive at RRL...

I don't see the RRL lasting ling enough to get off the ground.

The whole concept is just....

STUpiD !!!
--
Jim in NC

Stella Starr

December 17th 06, 04:10 AM

Yes (comma) that should be (quote) my wife (comma) the Grammar Nazi
(comma)(ellipsis) (quote) etc. Oyster will be disciplined.
Happy holidays and stuff to you and Ms. Black (smiley)

Montblack wrote:
> ("John Ousterhout" wrote)
>> YOU NICKING FUTPICKER! My wife the Grammar Nazi supplies all the nicking
>> futpicking that I can stand, thank you very much.
>
>
> I'm telling Stella you called her a Grammar Nazi without offsetting it with
> commas!
>
> Um, ...you also called Margene a man. (>Dear Mr. Black)
>
> You're on your own with that one, pal.
>
>
> Mont
> Feet up - typing away. Dr.'s orders! :-)
>
>

John Ammeter

December 17th 06, 04:25 AM

You getting out the black leather outfit?? I'm told he really likes it
if you wear those special high heels...

J

Stella Starr wrote:
> Yes (comma) that should be (quote) my wife (comma) the Grammar Nazi
> (comma)(ellipsis) (quote) etc. Oyster will be disciplined.
> Happy holidays and stuff to you and Ms. Black (smiley)
>
> Montblack wrote:
>
>> ("John Ousterhout" wrote)
>>
>>> YOU NICKING FUTPICKER! My wife the Grammar Nazi supplies all the
>>> nicking futpicking that I can stand, thank you very much.
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm telling Stella you called her a Grammar Nazi without offsetting it
>> with commas!
>>
>> Um, ...you also called Margene a man. (>Dear Mr. Black)
>>
>> You're on your own with that one, pal.
>>
>>
>> Mont
>> Feet up - typing away. Dr.'s orders! :-)
>>

Drew Dalgleish

December 17th 06, 06:20 AM

Hey I think you guys should cut Juan some slack cuz i think he knows
what he's talking about. after all IIRC he holds a world record
himself for the worlds smallest jet thats never flown.

Al G

December 17th 06, 06:21 AM

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
.. .

>
> "Mike Hogan" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 09:55:53 -0400, "Juan Jimenez" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"DABEAR" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>>>>
>>>> <snipped>
>>>>
>>>> Some things not included in the FAI's categories:
>>>
>>><mercy snipped>
>>>
>>>Any aviation-related records on issues such as:
>>>
>>>- size
>>>- weight
>>>- capacity
>>>- feats of strength associated with or performed with aircraft
>>>- repetition records associated with aircraft
>>>- anything not covered by FAI categories but clearly aviation-related
>>
>> Mr. Jimenez, does any orgaization, anwhere, not controlled by Mr.
>> Campbell, recognize Mr. Campbell's record as a current or past record?
>> It's a simple question.
>
> Go ask Mr. Campbell, Mike. Why come to me when you can go to the source?
> :)

I got an email from Zoom yesterday. Beyond the usual stuff: threats, get
a lawyer, besmirched his rep, I made false claims, etc. he admits his flight
constituted no more than an "unofficial record". He's kinda shy, and doesn't
want me to reveal or rely on anything he says. You know the "Legal" notice:
"No one is authorized to copy, use, disclose, distribute or rely on this
information.". Anyway, he did answer my question. No, his flight was not
sanctioned by any recognized authority. He made no mention of any barograph
or other recoding instrument to verify any accomplishment. It is in no way a
recognized "World Record". He apparently took off, went away for a while,
came back, landed, and claimed a "Record". I believe he has many pictures on
the ground.

My position remains unchanged. His Bio has inaccuracies that should be
corrected. I notified the RRL through their web contact button of the
inaccuracy of the "World Record" claim. Zoom should change his Bio to
reflect fact.

The Rocket Racing League, is in its infancy. Right now it needs support
and sponsors, and credibility.

Zoom isn't helping there a bit.

Al G

DABEAR

December 17th 06, 10:06 AM

Drew Dalgleish wrote:
> Hey I think you guys should cut Juan some slack cuz i think he knows
> what he's talking about. after all IIRC he holds a world record
> himself for the worlds smallest jet thats never flown.

LOL! And never will fly...

Yeah, here's a guy who is trying to defend a Journalist who is a known
liar and a fraud, and Yawn is a liar in his own right and no Journalist
as a result, just like his master.

Yawn deserves no slack, especially in the rope that hangs him. He
clearly doesn't know what he's talking about because he cannot support
the statements he makes with documented evidence or facts, nor does he
research those whom he attacks. He lies in the face of documented
facts. He libels and slanders others in the process. He tries to
mislead others when he can't get away with a lie.

Real Journalists don't do that.

That is pretty funny, though...the "world's smallest jet that has never
flown!" And he questions my aviation experience NOT with his own, not
even knowing one iota about my own experience, but tries to contrast me
with others that his master hides among after he screws up and is
afraid of getting beat up. Doesn't mention whom they are...wants us to
take his word on faith, just like his master. And still doesn't know
if they indeed, know more than I, because he hasn't done his research.

Quite the pair...Yawn and Jimbo the Rocket Clown!

[email protected]

December 17th 06, 11:02 AM

Stuart & Kathryn Fields wrote:
> I think all of you should write Campbell a thank you note for all of the
> entertainment he has provided even if it is indirectly. As a
> rec.aviation.homebuilt NG this sounds more like grade school bashing
> practice. I wish there could be interesting aviation related interchanges
> that focussed on a technical issue that attracted this much attention.
>
> --
> Stuart Fields
> Experimental Helo magazine
> P. O. Box 1585
> Inyokern, CA 93527
> (760) 377-4478
> (760) 408-9747 general and layout cell
> (760) 608-1299 technical and advertising cell
>
> www.vkss.com
> www.experimentalhelo.com
>
>
> "DABEAR" > wrote in message
> ups.com...
> >
> > ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
> > > This is the updated zoom bio from the RRL web site it's a hoot!!Just for
> grins
> > > I'm going to contact National Geographic.Popular Science and Popular
> Mechanics
> > > to see if zoom ever had a published article in them. Here's where it's
> at:
> > >
> > > www.rocketracingleague.com/bio_jim-campbell.html
> > >
> > >
> > > Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret
> > >
> > > and now heeeerrreeesss the bio!!!
> > >
> __________________________________________________ __________________________
> ___
> > >
> > >
> >
> > > A commercially rated pilot, Campbell has earned Flight instructor
> Ratings
> > > (CFI/A/I/ME/H) in fixed and rotary wing aircraft, and logged over 17,000
> flight
> > > hours in over 1100 different ultralights, jets, multi-engine A/C,
> helicopters,
> > > gyroplanes, autogyros, sailplanes, seaplanes, kit aircraft and general
> aviation
> > > birds.
> > > Among Campbell's many other lofty accomplishments are his 1981
> Ultralight World
> > > Record High Altitude flight to 21,210 feet over Lakehurst, New Jersey;
> flying on
> > > behalf of President Ronald Reagan as an airshow pilot during the 1981-82
> Air and
> > > Space Bicentennial; several years of film and TV aviation stunt work;
> his 1981
> > > Ultralight Flight Across America; 17 published books in the aviation
> field (with
> > > three more in the works for '06-'07); the first aviation journalist to
> solo and
> > > evaluate the awesome Russian Sukhoi SU-26 and SU-31, the FEW P-51
> Mustang, the
> > > Unlimited 10-300 and many other high performance aircraft. Jim was also
> the
> > > first fly-writer to sample and document the intriguing capabilities of
> the BD-10
> > > Jet, the Glasair III, the Van's RV-6 and dozens of other pivotal
> aircraft.
> > >
> >
> >
> > Now, what I would like to see are his extensive logbooks documenting
> > all this ****, and from there, his certificates; plus the Police Report
> > on his getting shot in the leg saving the little girl, the NTSB report
> > that mentions Campbell coming forward as a witness to them in the
> > Cerritos Air Disaster, beyond Time Magazine, etc., etc., etc.
> >
> > I remember when I brought up the fact this bio ~ and this is the third
> > rendition of a bio put up by/about/written by Campbell ~ indicated that
> > Campbell had test flown AND evaluated something like 1100 aircraft from
> > the age of thirteen. I questioned, editorially, "Who cares what a
> > thirteen year old's evaluation of an aircraft is?" In California, at
> > the time Campbell was thirteen, you had to be sixteen to get a license.
> > The RRL removed the bio, kept it dormant, then the changes were made
> > to the subsequent bio. "Test flown OR evaluated...la la la la la..."
> >
> > The RRL, as it is, is nothing more than a fraud. Fraud has been
> > associated with a number of the people in it, including
> >
> > 1) the CEO, Granger Whitelaw, over the Amber Alert Portal issue in
> > Arizona;
> > 2) Anousheh Ansari, accused with her husband Amid, of Insider Trading
> > in a stock issue in Massachusetts;
> > 3) Mike Houghton, of the Reno Air Racing Association, whose fraud has
> > been documented at my websites, but more importantly, at the RARA site
> > www.airrace.org, which has finally pronounced (2006) itself as an
> > "Invitational, Entertainment Event" versus an open to all, Motorsports
> > competition, along with the fact he uses strong arm tactics and thugs
> > to get his way in Reno, and has Racketeering connections to corrupt in
> > Law Enforcement and business in the area;
> > 4) his (Campbell's) good buddy, the Great and Magnificent Diamandis (OZ
> > ~ the humbug), who despite the fact that he and his rocket scientists
> > can only "envision" (L.A. Daily News) that folks might see the Rocket
> > Racers at altitude because of the exhaust flame, and don't for sure
> > (!), know one way or the other, and whom, along with Whitelaw, think
> > they're going to change the face of Air Racing, despite having to place
> > limiters on the engine throttles to keep the aircraft from coming apart
> > in the hands of an agressive pilot, and who claim "Rocket Racers"
> > though the competitions will be conducted after the engines are off and
> > the racers in glide, sure make the concept of Rocket Racing as a
> > legitimate and viable sport Highly Questionable, especially when their
> > racers will max out at 300 mph and Unlimited Air Racing is currently
> > capable of speeds in the 500 mph lap venue; and then
> > 5) Campbell, with a thirty year documented history of mental illness
> > and criminal misconduct that includes stalking, harassment, domestic
> > terrorism directed against fiance and ex-wife; impersonating a doctor;
> > prescribing medicines without a license; impersonating a Japan Air
> > Lines Boeing 747 pilot; trying to catch ultralights in his teeth
> > (Statue of Liberty, New York, with picture no less...); false
> > accusations against people he's worked with at Challenge publications;
> > allegations of making false statements to the Secret Service regarding
> > an alleged threat against the President by one of his enemies; his
> > Federal perjury which resulted in the temporary shut down of over 60 of
> > my websites, something which he will soon have to owe up to, hopefully
> > along with a stay in a Federal Penitentiary; his selling out as a
> > "Journalist;" his failure to abide by Journalistic Rules of Conduct and
> > Ethics; and on and on it goes with this clown, and the FAA and Law
> > Enforcement so far, have done virtually nothing about him. They take
> > away his license, then give it back to him, though he's diagnosed as a
> > schizophrenic by his Grandfather, a legitimate doctor.
> >
> > His mental condition is known by the FAA and the NTSB and they give him
> > a license that no one else possessing his absolutely insane, if not
> > inane, mentality, would get ~ particularly when it comes to their own
> > Air Traffic Controllers! And then pilots are supposed to have a higher
> > medical standard then ATC!?
> >
> > And then trying to profit personally on the blood of the victims of the
> > Cerritos/Aeromexico air disaster with his Time Magazine pronounciations
> > of Pull UP! Pull Up! For God's Sake Pull up!
> >
> > His day is coming, mark my words on that. The government can carry him
> > around on their backs like a sacred cow all they want ~ especially a
> > sacred cow whose one religious belief they have in him surrounds him
> > giving them good press and his readers believing it as "Gospel" ~ but
> > enough exposure in the Press and in the Courts, and his downfall will
> > be just as hard and tragic as he will make it to be.
> >
> > Hopefully, he won't be taking out an airliner full of people with him!
> >
> > This individual shouldn't be flying; he shouldn't be in Journalism; he
> > should be institutionalized, preferably, in a Federal Penitentiary, and
> > anyone aiding and abetting his current existence in Journalism or
> > Aviation, should be sent there along with him as an Accessory to his
> > crimes. Especially, his good buddies at the FAA, Aero News and the
> > RRL.
> >
> > Period.
> >
> > Vietnam Veteran...bull...according to the paperwork I have, which is
> > nothing new on the internet, he didn't last half a year in the Air
> > Force. The Air Force won't release information on him nor why he was
> > discharged so quickly. Hey Campbell...let's see your DD Form 214
> > public, to include your RE code, moron!
> >
> > Campbell reminds me of the Leonardo DiCaprio character from "Catch Me
> > If You Can." Only, he has nothing to offer that isn't already known as
> > fraud and criminal misconduct that the FAA and the Law could outsmart,
> > if they merely wanted to. Are prisons are full of people like him. I
> > say, make room for one more!!!
> >
> > In fact, considering the conditions of the French Prison that held
> > DiCaprio's character, I say send him to a French prison. Get his stink
> > out of America, American Journalism and American Aerospace!
> >
> > And as for Diamandis making a Rocket Racer out of this clown ~ I think
> > that holds up as the greatest proof of Diamandis' fraud, putting a
> > mental defective in the cockpit of a rocket powered plane in close
> > proximity to potentially hundreds of thousands of people on the
> > ground...
> >
> > Diamandis annoints, and so be it! Someone needs to check the pilot
> > selection criteria at RRL and X Prize, for that matter, and the medical
> > requirements to be a Rocket Racer...they're getting a very dangerous
> > start from the Government, whose head is turned away from such a sore
> > subject as James R. "Captain Zoom" Cambell.
> >

This thread is sort of important,if you follow the history of zzzoom
you will find the internet was his downfall. Prior to the net He would
go back and forth across the country. Get into a mess on the east coast
head for California ect. The net tied all his B.S. together and allowed
the real story out. It is very important that people have the real
facts on zzzoomy , not just the crap he spews.

For jaun if you believe everything that your hero writes, believe him
when he said he beat feet when I approached him. He did and then he
called the police. At another time when I walked up to him he said that
I was breaking the law by approaching him. I said you are such a bad
ass why don't we go out behind the hangar and settle this man to man,
again he called the police. When Chuck and I tried to thank him in
person for a chicken dinner, he called the police and threatened us
with arrest. Then to add insult to that he accused us in print of
stealing his chicken. That is totally false we stood in line and we
were served like everyone else. An amusing fact was zzzoom was really
the chicken thief. He didn't pay the Lakeland Boys and Girls club that
catered the party. He did finally pay up only after they sued him.

Jeez juan I'll bet you are as brave as your hero, what a cowardly
piece of crap.

Frank M.Hitlaw

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 02:37 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>> > You know, I'll tell you what...I will make it a point, no ~ a Crusade ~
>> > to get the truth out of your boyfriend in person! Face to face.
>>
>> Sure you will. :)
>
> Bank on it...

Sure you will. LOL!

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 02:38 PM

"Dan" > wrote in message
...
> You lie, if you didn't care you wouldn't respond to me.

That's kinda like the Shrub saying people give a **** about this
pigheadedness when they criticize him. Spare me. :)

> I have no problem going up to him and asking, I just don't plan on making
> a ....

Excuses, excuses....

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 02:39 PM

"Dan" > wrote in message
...
> DABEAR wrote:
>> john smith wrote:
>>> I screwed that story up, didn't I?
>>
>>
>> Nooooooo. Happens to the best of us.
>>
>> Besides, if you want to read some really screwed up stories, try...
>>
>> ...wait for it...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Aero-News.Scam!
>>
> Or yawn's "reporting" on what really happened at S'n'F.

That's the beauty of it, I didn't have to report anything that day, the
print and TV media in the Lakeland area did that for us. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 02:43 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Yawn wrote:
>
>>Sorry to hear you're so pitifully misinformed. XPrize Cup <> Mojave. Bring
>>some more quarters the next time. :)
>
> Why? Can't you afford to pay for your own rides?

I prefer it when other people pay for the ride because they value my work.
Ever hear of the concept?

> Not really...I was just laughing that you claim to be a journalist...

<mercy snip>

And now you're an expert on who is and isn't a journalist too? :)

<2nd mercy snip of ape**** Mark responding to aviation experience comment.
Check.> :)

> "Picture Websites" which are coming, are referred to as
> "Photojournalism,"....

<bzzz!> Wrong answer, putz. Photojournalism has to do with associating
images with news, not collecting aviation pictures, which, as I said, has
nothing to do with claiming aviation experience.

Next!

<3rd mercy snip... nothing of consequences encountered that would indicate
intelligence> :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 02:44 PM

"Stuart & Kathryn Fields" > wrote in message
.. .
>I think all of you should write Campbell a thank you note for all of the
> entertainment he has provided even if it is indirectly. As a
> rec.aviation.homebuilt NG this sounds more like grade school bashing
> practice. I wish there could be interesting aviation related interchanges
> that focussed on a technical issue that attracted this much attention.

Remind yourself that anything related to the rah gaggle of idiots is just
that, grade school children posting. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 02:46 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Yawn wrote:
>
> As I said, putz, the statement that FAI is the repository of all
> "aviation-related" records is wrong. Period.
>
>
> I think you're backpeddaling, Yawn.

You? Thinking? LOL! :)

> My argument, along with others, is in regards to whom should be certifying
> records and why.

Oh, I get it. You're assuming I give a **** what you think, Markyboi. Toldya
it was a bad idea for you to try to think. :)

Next!

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 02:47 PM

"Dan" > wrote in message
...
>
> By yawn's "logic" if you write down (somewhere, anywhere) that you have
> set a record then you have.

And by Dan "Get Over it"'s Logic the word "barograph" means "somewhere,
anywhere". Why do you keep sticking your foot in your mouth, Dan? Because
it feels good when you need to pull it out? :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 02:50 PM

"Mike Hogan" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 21:06:09 -0400, "Juan Jimenez" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Mike Hogan" > wrote in message
...
>>> On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 09:55:53 -0400, "Juan Jimenez" >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"DABEAR" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>>>>>
>>>>> <snipped>
>>>>>
>>>>> Some things not included in the FAI's categories:
>>>>
>>>><mercy snipped>
>>>>
>>>>Any aviation-related records on issues such as:
>>>>
>>>>- size
>>>>- weight
>>>>- capacity
>>>>- feats of strength associated with or performed with aircraft
>>>>- repetition records associated with aircraft
>>>>- anything not covered by FAI categories but clearly aviation-related
>>>
>>> Mr. Jimenez, does any orgaization, anwhere, not controlled by Mr.
>>> Campbell, recognize Mr. Campbell's record as a current or past record?
>>> It's a simple question.
>>
>>Go ask Mr. Campbell, Mike. Why come to me when you can go to the source?
>>:)
>
> I did, 3 days ago. He hasn't answered. That's why I asked you. You
> seem to know a lot about him, I thought you might know.

Nope, sorry. He's the source. :)

> I've also asked the reference librarian at the URL (which used to mean
> University Research Library, back in the day) and he's a pilot so he's
> familiar with NAA and FAI, he looked through his databases and
> couldn't find anything.

That's been discussed here as well.

> So, since Mr. Campbell isn't answering, do you believe that any
> orgaization has recognized his record?

That may depend on whether or not any organization was keeping track of
microlight records back in 1981. I can't find any references to any
microlight records that far back in either NAA or FAI, nor can I even find
the date when the CIMA commission was created.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 02:51 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Drew Dalgleish wrote:
>> Hey I think you guys should cut Juan some slack cuz i think he knows
>> what he's talking about. after all IIRC he holds a world record
>> himself for the worlds smallest jet thats never flown.
>
> LOL! And never will fly...

LOL! Another ****ant putz prediction from the person who claims running an
aviation pictures website qualifies as "aviation experience." :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 02:56 PM

"Al G" > wrote in message
...
>>
>> Go ask Mr. Campbell, Mike. Why come to me when you can go to the source?
>> :)
>
> He made no mention of any barograph or other recoding instrument to verify
> any accomplishment.

http://www.aero-news.net/Community/DiscussTopic.cfm?TopicID=1905&Refresh=1

The barograph is mentioned right there next to the altitude, Al.

Are you sure you got that email from Jim? :)

Juan

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

DABEAR

December 17th 06, 03:40 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> That's the beauty of it, I didn't have to report anything that day, the
> print and TV media in the Lakeland area did that for us. :)

A double-edged sword that's going to take down your boss and you.

DABEAR

December 17th 06, 03:43 PM

BobR wrote:
> Like Campbell, Jaun is a legend in his own mind. He honestly believes
> his pathetic replies are effective and someone actually believes
> anything he says. He is about as worthless as a flea on an elephants
> butt. Quit responding to the fool and just ignore him like you would
> any other stupid moron. He is a total waste of your time and efforts.

Yeah, his responses have kind of petered out, but he's given up enough
information in this one thread alone to make what's going to happen
next a whole helluva lot of fun!

Chris Wells

December 17th 06, 03:45 PM

I don't know about you guys, but whenever I see one of Juan's posts, I get a crisp, clear mental image of a small, persistently-yapping chihuahua.

I don't think you guys are being fair to him. He seems to be almost as mentally unstable as Jim Campbell. Has anyone seen this BD-5J of his actually flying?

DABEAR

December 17th 06, 03:50 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> LOL! Another ****ant putz prediction from the person who claims running an
> aviation pictures website qualifies as "aviation experience." :)

Naw, I'll just borrow a quote from you and say that it's "obvious by
your posts."

Instead of running your mouth here you could be out finishing your toy
plane with its snowmobile engine.

Well, pretty soon, that ghoul Campbell will be profiting once again off
the dead...and not as the result of one of your test flights or another
Air Disaster in which he tells tail-less aircraft to pull up...it'll be
a report on how the FAA grounded a guy's project before it flew because
he kleco'd it to death and as we all know, pigs and porcupines don't
fly! LOL!

Hey Juan, it's been real, it's been fun, but it ain't been real fun,
therefore, so long!

Keep an eye out for this website: www.theextremist.us . It's under
construction at this time. We'll even have some pictures there for
you! LOL!

Dan[_2_]

December 17th 06, 04:12 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> "Dan" > wrote in message
> ...
>> DABEAR wrote:
>>> john smith wrote:
>>>> I screwed that story up, didn't I?
>>>
>>> Nooooooo. Happens to the best of us.
>>>
>>> Besides, if you want to read some really screwed up stories, try...
>>>
>>> ...wait for it...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Aero-News.Scam!
>>>
>> Or yawn's "reporting" on what really happened at S'n'F.
>
> That's the beauty of it, I didn't have to report anything that day, the
> print and TV media in the Lakeland area did that for us. :)
>
>
>
And they reported the opposite of what campbell and you tell us.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Harry K

December 17th 06, 04:32 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> "Al G" > wrote in message
> ...
> >>
> >> Go ask Mr. Campbell, Mike. Why come to me when you can go to the source?
> >> :)
> >
> > He made no mention of any barograph or other recoding instrument to verify
> > any accomplishment.
>
> http://www.aero-news.net/Community/DiscussTopic.cfm?TopicID=1905&Refresh=1
>
> The barograph is mentioned right there next to the altitude, Al.
>
> Are you sure you got that email from Jim? :)
>
> Juan
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Supposing (and that is a looonnng 'suppose') that the barograph
actually existed. What part of a barograph that wasn't sealed and
certified by a disinterestped party did you not understand? Claiming
that "I made a record and here is the barograph" Is just about as
credible as "I made a record and (points) there is the cloud I flew
above in that (points) plane"
That is, exactly no credibility at all.

Harry K

Jerry Springer

December 17th 06, 05:11 PM

red12049[_1_]

December 17th 06, 05:37 PM

Kinda funny actually.... I lived in New Jersey during the time period
mentioned. Couldn't remember a show in Lakehurst. Thought maybe it was my
Air Force bias, so I did a search. And searched. And searched some more.
I cannot find a single historical reference to an airshow at Lakehurst in
1981. Found several references for the Memorial Day airshow at McGuire AFB,
which is what I thought I remembered. Not far apart geographically, but
worlds apart for a pilot. For the record, the Mcguire airshow is one of the
largest in the east each year. I sincerely doubt, given factors such as
parking, crowd & traffic control and airspace control, that two military
installations so close to each other would have competing airshows. Makes
this whole insane asylum even more interesting and mysterious.

"Harry K" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> "Al G" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >>
>> >> Go ask Mr. Campbell, Mike. Why come to me when you can go to the
>> >> source?
>> >> :)
>> >
>> > He made no mention of any barograph or other recoding instrument to
>> > verify
>> > any accomplishment.
>>
>> http://www.aero-news.net/Community/DiscussTopic.cfm?TopicID=1905&Refresh=1
>>
>> The barograph is mentioned right there next to the altitude, Al.
>>
>> Are you sure you got that email from Jim? :)
>>
>> Juan
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>
> Supposing (and that is a looonnng 'suppose') that the barograph
> actually existed. What part of a barograph that wasn't sealed and
> certified by a disinterestped party did you not understand? Claiming
> that "I made a record and here is the barograph" Is just about as
> credible as "I made a record and (points) there is the cloud I flew
> above in that (points) plane"
> That is, exactly no credibility at all.
>
> Harry K
>

DABEAR

December 17th 06, 05:55 PM

Jerry Springer wrote:

> Juan and Jim are getting exactly what they want, they get off on seeing
> their names written about over and over again. <snipped>

Jerry

It's a good point, but remember, these threads are separated into
different topics allowing folks to avoid threads involving Captain Zoom
by mere mention of his name in the headlines.

There's also an old saying that applies to both and it's critical: "Be
careful what you wish ~ you might get it."

The "joy" with which they embrace their evil ~ as reflected in their
writings and postings ~ will come back to haunt them at a later date,
especially considering Campbell's thirty-year history of misconduct and
criminal misconduct, including stalking and domestic terrorism.

I think Juan's the only one getting off right now. Campbell is laying
might low and watching his P's & Q's very carefully. All that's needed
is one honest Federal Judge, and he goes to prison for life on charges
of Federal Perjury alone. The thirty years of Criminal misconduct
seals his fate on those recent charges alone. "Habitual Criminal"
becomes an issue, and like I said, he's being aided and abetted...so
those are the ones that matter at this point in time, three decades
later, especially where the FAA and NTSB are involved, know his
history, and have done nothing about him though now benefitting from
good publicity given to them by him.

Al G

December 17th 06, 06:32 PM

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
.. .
>
> "Al G" > wrote in message
> ...
>>>
>>> Go ask Mr. Campbell, Mike. Why come to me when you can go to the source?
>>> :)
>>
>> He made no mention of any barograph or other recoding instrument to
>> verify any accomplishment.
>
> http://www.aero-news.net/Community/DiscussTopic.cfm?TopicID=1905&Refresh=1
>
> The barograph is mentioned right there next to the altitude, Al.
>

Didn't see it in the email.

> Are you sure you got that email from Jim? :)
>

I can't tell you or I'd have to kill you. You have seen some of his email
haven't you? Apparently I should be seeking legal council right now.

I've got no big thing for zoom, generally he is harmless to the well
informed.

I have not said anywhere that his flight didn't occur.

I have said that he is claiming a title he has not earned, and that I, as
one who has earned the title, object.

All I ask is that he remove reference to "World Record", and replace it with
something more appropriate, say "Personal Best".

If an advisory board member of an aviation organization claimed to be a
pilot and wasn't, would you correct him?

That too is easily verifiable, and there is but one recognized authority.
You wouldn't accept someone's unofficial license, would you?

Al G

Jethro

December 17th 06, 07:16 PM

The issue of a record is fairly easily dispensed with if not silenced.
Without the benefit of independant documentation the attempt or feat simply
never occurred. There are many persons today with the opinion that Jacob
Brodbeck or Gustav Whitehead achieved the world's first powered flight years
before the Wright brothers. The claims are not silenced by the fact that
only the Wrights had their attempt (and success) documented properly. The
others are simply pretenders, they may not be liars, but they hold no record
and all the claims in the world will not change recorded fact.

The same principal may well apply in the case your ZZZ fellow. He makes an
unrecognized claim, there appears to be no record of fact to back the claim
and in official terms that means it never happened, he is (or was) also a
self admitted liar. But that is unlikely to stifle the claim, especially
from someone so clearly enamoured of himself.

John Ousterhout

December 17th 06, 07:49 PM

Al G wrote:
> I got an email from Zoom yesterday. Beyond the usual stuff: threats, get
> a lawyer, besmirched his rep, I made false claims, etc.

Congratulations, you've won a T-Shirt.
http://ousterhout.net/gallery/I've_been_zoomed.jpg

Wear it proudly.

John Ousterhout
- rah-14

Al G

December 17th 06, 08:37 PM

"John Ousterhout" > wrote in message
news:fbhhh.274084$FQ1.4251@attbi_s71...
> Al G wrote:
>> I got an email from Zoom yesterday. Beyond the usual stuff: threats,
>> get a lawyer, besmirched his rep, I made false claims, etc.
>
> Congratulations, you've won a T-Shirt.
> http://ousterhout.net/gallery/I've_been_zoomed.jpg
>
> Wear it proudly.
>
> John Ousterhout
> - rah-14

No **** John? Damn, I'm, well, Honored. I'd like to thank my parents, and
teachers, and all the little people that made my rise to ultimate success a
reality.

By the way, I got another nasty gram. What is "Tortuous Interference"
anyway? I wish Tony was here...

Al G

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 08:42 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>> That's the beauty of it, I didn't have to report anything that day, the
>> print and TV media in the Lakeland area did that for us. :)
>
> A double-edged sword that's going to take down your boss and you.

Is that a promise? How precious. <chuckle>

BTW, you're doing a great job of proving how much of an ignorant slut you
truly are. Jim's not my boss. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 08:42 PM

"Dan" > wrote in message
...
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> "Dan" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> DABEAR wrote:
>>>> john smith wrote:
>>>>> I screwed that story up, didn't I?
>>>>
>>>> Nooooooo. Happens to the best of us.
>>>>
>>>> Besides, if you want to read some really screwed up stories, try...
>>>>
>>>> ...wait for it...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Aero-News.Scam!
>>>>
>>> Or yawn's "reporting" on what really happened at S'n'F.
>>
>> That's the beauty of it, I didn't have to report anything that day, the
>> print and TV media in the Lakeland area did that for us. :)
> And they reported the opposite of what campbell and you tell us.

I know you have trouble reading. It's ok for you to admit it. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 08:45 PM

"Jerry Springer" > wrote in message
news:5Tehh.402$HT5.139@trnddc02...
> Stuart & Kathryn Fields wrote:
>> I think all of you should write Campbell a thank you note for all of the
>> entertainment he has provided even if it is indirectly. As a
>> rec.aviation.homebuilt NG this sounds more like grade school bashing
>> practice. I wish there could be interesting aviation related
>> interchanges
>> that focussed on a technical issue that attracted this much attention.
>>
>
> Juan and Jim are getting exactly what they want, they get off on seeing
> their names written about over and over again.

Nice try, but not even close. Jim doesn't read usenet. And all I get a kick
out of is yanking the chains and watching the rah monkeys jump up and down.
:)

You see, kiddo, if what I wanted was attention, why do I only respond to
posts, rather than creating the threads? Keep your day job, you're not a
shrink either. Better direct your therapy efforts at the Chuck Steak, he's
the one who keeps posting on and on and on about Jim. Seems like Jim really
did do a good job on him.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 08:46 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ps.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>> LOL! Another ****ant putz prediction from the person who claims running
>> an
>> aviation pictures website qualifies as "aviation experience." :)
>
> Naw, I'll just borrow a quote from you and say that it's "obvious by your
> posts."

The only thing obvious from your posts is how boring you are...

<mercy snip>

So, what is your aviation experience, Markyboi? :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 08:47 PM

"Harry K" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> "Al G" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >>
>> >> Go ask Mr. Campbell, Mike. Why come to me when you can go to the
>> >> source?
>> >> :)
>> >
>> > He made no mention of any barograph or other recoding instrument to
>> > verify
>> > any accomplishment.
>>
>> http://www.aero-news.net/Community/DiscussTopic.cfm?TopicID=1905&Refresh=1
>>
>> The barograph is mentioned right there next to the altitude, Al.
>>
>> Are you sure you got that email from Jim? :)
>>
>> Juan
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>
> Supposing (and that is a looonnng 'suppose') that the barograph
> actually existed. What part of a barograph that wasn't sealed and
> certified by a disinterestped party did you not understand? Claiming
> that "I made a record and here is the barograph" Is just about as
> credible as "I made a record and (points) there is the cloud I flew
> above in that (points) plane"
> That is, exactly no credibility at all.

So go ask. That was Lakehurst NAS. Plenty of people were there. I'm sure you
can find someone who was there and can prove or disprove. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 08:55 PM

"Al G" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
> .. .
>>
>> "Al G" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>>
>>>> Go ask Mr. Campbell, Mike. Why come to me when you can go to the
>>>> source? :)
>>>
>>> He made no mention of any barograph or other recoding instrument to
>>> verify any accomplishment.
>>
>> http://www.aero-news.net/Community/DiscussTopic.cfm?TopicID=1905&Refresh=1
>>
>> The barograph is mentioned right there next to the altitude, Al.
>>
> Didn't see it in the email.
>
>> Are you sure you got that email from Jim? :)
>
> I can't tell you or I'd have to kill you. You have seen some of his email
> haven't you? Apparently I should be seeking legal council right now.

Unhuh. Yeah, sure.

> I've got no big thing for zoom, generally he is harmless to the well
> informed.
>
> I have not said anywhere that his flight didn't occur.
>
> I have said that he is claiming a title he has not earned, and that I, as
> one who has earned the title, object.
>
> All I ask is that he remove reference to "World Record", and replace it
> with something more appropriate, say "Personal Best".

I admit that sounds reasonable, if in fact the events are as you describe
them.

> If an advisory board member of an aviation organization claimed to be a
> pilot and wasn't, would you correct him?

In that we do agree.

> That too is easily verifiable, and there is but one recognized authority.
> You wouldn't accept someone's unofficial license, would you?

Except for the fact that you can ask to be removed from public records that
state you have a license. Go look up Jim in the FAA pilot database. He's not
there, but he definitely has a pilot's license, I have seen it.

Juan

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 08:57 PM

"Jethro" > wrote in message
...
> The issue of a record is fairly easily dispensed with if not silenced.
> Without the benefit of independant documentation the attempt or feat
> simply never occurred.

So, if no one hears the tree fall, it never happened. Interesting. :)

> There are many persons today with the opinion that Jacob Brodbeck or
> Gustav Whitehead achieved the world's first powered flight years before
> the Wright brothers. The claims are not silenced by the fact that only the
> Wrights had their attempt (and success) documented properly.

Silenced? I believe you can rest assured such is not the case. Go look him
up on Google. It's amazing how loud silence can actually be, if you're
listening. :)

Juan

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

DABEAR

December 17th 06, 09:16 PM

Yawn wrote:

>Nice try, but not even close. Jim doesn't read usenet. And all I get a kick
>out of is yanking the chains and watching the rah monkeys jump up and down.
>:)

It's been documented that Campbell has posted here before. Especially
his threats that everyone should "govern themselves accordingly," a
line he stole from a Judge who stated that to him in a trial where he
came an inch from being cited for Contempt. That trial transcript is
also recorded on the internet.

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 10:50 PM

"Chris Wells" > wrote in message
...
>
> I don't know about you guys, but whenever I see one of Juan's posts, I
> get a crisp, clear mental image of a small, persistently-yapping
> chihuahua.

You shouldn't eat so much taco bell, not with all that e-coli flopping
around. Gives you hallucinations. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 10:53 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
> Yawn wrote:
>
>>Nice try, but not even close. Jim doesn't read usenet. And all I get a
>>kick
>>out of is yanking the chains and watching the rah monkeys jump up and
>>down.
>>:)
>
> It's been documented that Campbell has posted here before.

You think, retard? LOL! Of course, that has nothing to do with my statement,
but hey, it's ok, you're lacking in mental skills to match the size of your
mouth, so it's cool. I won't hold that against you.

Tell you one thing, though, you need to do something about those pictures of
yourself you put on all those websites you have "under construction." For
one thing, your posture sucks and you look like an idiot in a flight jacket
and an unshaved face. Tom Cruise you're not, bubba. For another thing, you
need to understand that creating a ****load of websites using the same
braindead, ugly template and claiming you're the news service for half the
world doesn't mean squat in real time. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Jethro

December 17th 06, 10:54 PM

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
.. .
>
> Silenced? I believe you can rest assured such is not the case. Go look him
> up on Google. It's amazing how loud silence can actually be, if you're
> listening. :)
>
> Juan

I have no doubt that he will never be silenced, nor his critics. The one
blessing is that unlike the Wrights nobody will likely be arguing about ZZZ
in a hundred years. It's not so much if a tree falls, it's more a case of if
you rob a liquor store and nobody can place you at the scene, you didn't do
it in the eyes of any judge. I know a man who claims to have hit twenty
hole-in-one shots, all without witnesses. I completely disregard his claim,
as I do some others. I've hit a single hole-in-one and doubt I'll ever hit
another, but my name is on the clubhouse wall and his isn't.

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 10:54 PM

"Richard Riley" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 15:45:28 +0000, Chris Wells
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>I don't know about you guys, but whenever I see one of Juan's posts, I
>>get a crisp, clear mental image of a small, persistently-yapping
>>chihuahua.
>>
>>I don't think you guys are being fair to him. He seems to be almost as
>>mentally unstable as Jim Campbell. Has anyone seen this BD-5J of his
>>actually flying?
>
> I don't think he's ever claimed that it's flown.
>
> Juan's is an unusual hobby, hooking up with frauds and defending them
> against all odds. I can't see that it's profitable, but if he enjoys
> it, I suppose that's all that matters.
>
> On the other hand, maybe he's got enough sense to not actually put his
> life on the line, when he's got young offspring to around. It's a
> heck of a decision to look your child in the face and tell him you
> might not come back from this flight, you might never see him again,
> because you want to go fly an impractical airplane for fun.

Kinda like some of the rah gaggle and planes flying into the ground because
no one could get the engine install right? :)

One thing's for sure, you must not have children. And if you do, I hope you
don't treatment like your hero did. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 10:58 PM

"Richard Riley" > wrote in message
...
>
> I would LIKE it to succeed. I think it would be a wonderful thing.
> But Mr. Campbell's involvement is a huge handicap for them to
> overcome. Iif you were, say, Red Bull or Garmin and you were thinking
> about droping 7 figures into this to sponsor a plane, you'd do your
> due dilligence, run a google search on everyone involved and find
> Ouster's site. At that point you'd stop returning phone calls.

LOL! talk about delusions of grandeur... how many of ANN's sponsors do you
think have received emails or letters from the rah yapping and whining team?
Probably most of them. As you can see, each and everyone of you has achieved
exactly the same result from attacking Jim in front of anyone.

Squat.

What I recommend for you is that you confront the consequences of letting
your jealousy at not being in as much as the long list for the toilet
cleaning team at RRL influence so many of your thoughts...

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 11:00 PM

"Richard Riley" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:49:31 GMT, John Ousterhout
> > wrote:
>
>>Al G wrote:
>>> I got an email from Zoom yesterday. Beyond the usual stuff: threats,
>>> get
>>> a lawyer, besmirched his rep, I made false claims, etc.
>>
>>Congratulations, you've won a T-Shirt.
>>http://ousterhout.net/gallery/I've_been_zoomed.jpg
>>
>>Wear it proudly.
>>
>>John Ousterhout
>>- rah-14
>
> Wow, John, it's been years since we've gotten a new inductee.
>
> I've been wondering who's been keeping Zoomer stable since Tim Kern
> left and got airbrushed. I guess it's just been a matter of time.

If you think Tim was the one keeping Jim stable... man, all I can tell you
is the depth of your ignorance is absolutely astounding.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 17th 06, 11:07 PM

"Jethro" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
> .. .
>>
>> Silenced? I believe you can rest assured such is not the case. Go look
>> him up on Google. It's amazing how loud silence can actually be, if
>> you're listening. :)
>>
>> Juan
>
> I have no doubt that he will never be silenced, nor his critics. The one
> blessing is that unlike the Wrights nobody will likely be arguing about
> ZZZ in a hundred years.

Could be, but you can rest assured the chances of someone talking about you
in a hundred years is but a very small fraction of that. :)

> It's not so much if a tree falls, it's more a case of if you rob a liquor
> store and nobody can place you at the scene, you didn't do it in the eyes
> of any judge.

<chuckle> The last time I checked, Lakehurst NAS used to draw literally
hundreds of thousands of people, particularly for their Blue Angels
performances. You gotta work on your analogies, pal.

> I know a man who claims to have hit twenty hole-in-one shots, all without
> witnesses. I completely disregard his claim, as I do some others. I've hit
> a single hole-in-one and doubt I'll ever hit another, but my name is on
> the clubhouse wall and his isn't.

I tried golf. Once, got a birthday gift, 10 hours of lessons. Was being
taught how to hit the ball with the #1, at the driving range. I sucked, then
got a bit better and whacked one hard, up and straight down the range. The
ball happened to hit a bird, one of those long legged white ones that hang
out at landfills and near shorelines. I'm probably the only person in Puerto
Rico to have ever accomplished such a feat at a driving range. There must
have been some 50 people there, all practicing, just a 30 second walk from
the clubhouse. They were all astounded. No plaque on the wall, no record.
The only one I care about who was there to remember was my son. Do you think
I give a flying intercourse who else remembers, whether any photos were
taken, who were the witnesses, etc.? :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Dan[_2_]

December 17th 06, 11:13 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> "Dan" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>> "Dan" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> DABEAR wrote:
>>>>> john smith wrote:
>>>>>> I screwed that story up, didn't I?
>>>>> Nooooooo. Happens to the best of us.
>>>>>
>>>>> Besides, if you want to read some really screwed up stories, try...
>>>>>
>>>>> ...wait for it...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Aero-News.Scam!
>>>>>
>>>> Or yawn's "reporting" on what really happened at S'n'F.
>>> That's the beauty of it, I didn't have to report anything that day, the
>>> print and TV media in the Lakeland area did that for us. :)
>> And they reported the opposite of what campbell and you tell us.
>
> I know you have trouble reading. It's ok for you to admit it. :)
>
>
>
I thought you said you didn't care what I think. If so, why do you
keep squeaking up?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Dan[_2_]

December 17th 06, 11:17 PM

Al G wrote:
> "John Ousterhout" > wrote in message
> news:fbhhh.274084$FQ1.4251@attbi_s71...
>> Al G wrote:
>>> I got an email from Zoom yesterday. Beyond the usual stuff: threats,
>>> get a lawyer, besmirched his rep, I made false claims, etc.
>> Congratulations, you've won a T-Shirt.
>> http://ousterhout.net/gallery/I've_been_zoomed.jpg
>>
>> Wear it proudly.
>>
>> John Ousterhout
>> - rah-14
>
> No **** John? Damn, I'm, well, Honored. I'd like to thank my parents, and
> teachers, and all the little people that made my rise to ultimate success a
> reality.
>
> By the way, I got another nasty gram. What is "Tortuous Interference"
> anyway? I wish Tony was here...
>
> Al G
>
>
It means you confused him. Did you use facts?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Dan[_2_]

December 17th 06, 11:18 PM

Richard Riley wrote:
> On 17 Dec 2006 13:16:29 -0800, "DABEAR" >
> wrote:
>
>> Yawn wrote:
>>
>>> Nice try, but not even close. Jim doesn't read usenet. And all I get a kick
>>> out of is yanking the chains and watching the rah monkeys jump up and down.
>>> :)
>> It's been documented that Campbell has posted here before. Especially
>> his threats that everyone should "govern themselves accordingly," a
>> line he stole from a Judge who stated that to him in a trial where he
>> came an inch from being cited for Contempt. That trial transcript is
>> also recorded on the internet.
>
> Sorry to correct you, Bear. Campbell was using that line for many
> years - probably decades - before that trial. Ron W knows which trial
> it was, I'm sure - I think it was a Federal Judge, in one of
> Campbell's various suits against Sun n Fun.
>
> Of course, that's what made it hillarious when the judge hit him with
> it.
>
Did campbell comprehend it at the time as applying to him?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Dan[_2_]

December 17th 06, 11:21 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> "Al G" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
>> .. .
>>> "Al G" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>> Go ask Mr. Campbell, Mike. Why come to me when you can go to the
>>>>> source? :)
>>>> He made no mention of any barograph or other recoding instrument to
>>>> verify any accomplishment.
>>> http://www.aero-news.net/Community/DiscussTopic.cfm?TopicID=1905&Refresh=1
>>>
>>> The barograph is mentioned right there next to the altitude, Al.
>>>
>> Didn't see it in the email.
>>
>>> Are you sure you got that email from Jim? :)
>> I can't tell you or I'd have to kill you. You have seen some of his email
>> haven't you? Apparently I should be seeking legal council right now.
>
> Unhuh. Yeah, sure.
>
>> I've got no big thing for zoom, generally he is harmless to the well
>> informed.
>>
>> I have not said anywhere that his flight didn't occur.
>>
>> I have said that he is claiming a title he has not earned, and that I, as
>> one who has earned the title, object.
>>
>> All I ask is that he remove reference to "World Record", and replace it
>> with something more appropriate, say "Personal Best".
>
> I admit that sounds reasonable, if in fact the events are as you describe
> them.
>
>> If an advisory board member of an aviation organization claimed to be a
>> pilot and wasn't, would you correct him?
>
> In that we do agree.
>
>> That too is easily verifiable, and there is but one recognized authority.
>> You wouldn't accept someone's unofficial license, would you?
>
> Except for the fact that you can ask to be removed from public records that
> state you have a license. Go look up Jim in the FAA pilot database. He's not
> there, but he definitely has a pilot's license, I have seen it.
>
> Juan
>
It was revoked for his having failed a medical by being mentally ill.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Dan[_2_]

December 17th 06, 11:22 PM

Richard Riley wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 15:45:28 +0000, Chris Wells
> > wrote:
>
>> I don't know about you guys, but whenever I see one of Juan's posts, I
>> get a crisp, clear mental image of a small, persistently-yapping
>> chihuahua.
>>
>> I don't think you guys are being fair to him. He seems to be almost as
>> mentally unstable as Jim Campbell. Has anyone seen this BD-5J of his
>> actually flying?
>
> I don't think he's ever claimed that it's flown.
>
> Juan's is an unusual hobby, hooking up with frauds and defending them
> against all odds. I can't see that it's profitable, but if he enjoys
> it, I suppose that's all that matters.
>
> On the other hand, maybe he's got enough sense to not actually put his
> life on the line, when he's got young offspring to around. It's a
> heck of a decision to look your child in the face and tell him you
> might not come back from this flight, you might never see him again,
> because you want to go fly an impractical airplane for fun.

He reproduced?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

John Ousterhout

December 17th 06, 11:24 PM

DABEAR wrote:
> [Zoom's] threats that everyone should "govern themselves accordingly,"
> a line he stole from a Judge who stated that to him in a trial where he
> came an inch from being cited for Contempt. That trial transcript is
> also recorded on the internet.

Actually Zoom has used the "Govern Yourself Accordingly" threat for
years. I first saw it about 1995.

Then in one of those GREAT KARMA moments (08-27-99) Zoom was told
"Conduct yourself accordingly" in court by a Federal Judge.
http://www.ousterhout.net/zoom/fed-snf.html

I doubt that he appreciated the irony.

John Ousterhout
rah-14

Dan[_2_]

December 17th 06, 11:27 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> "DABEAR" > wrote in message
> ups.com...
>> Yawn wrote:
..
>>
> Tell you one thing, though, you need to do something about those pictures of
> yourself you put on all those websites you have "under construction." For
> one thing, your posture sucks and you look like an idiot in a flight jacket
> and an unshaved face. Tom Cruise you're not, bubba. For another thing, you
> need to understand that creating a ****load of websites using the same
> braindead, ugly template and claiming you're the news service for half the
> world doesn't mean squat in real time. :)
>

Better watch out, big guy, I think yawn is lusting after you.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Jethro

December 18th 06, 12:00 AM

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
.. .
> Could be, but you can rest assured the chances of someone talking about
> you in a hundred years is but a very small fraction of that. :)
>
I have never sought attention or the recognition of others, in fact I
dislike it. So I am quite glad that nobody will be discussing me in any way
next week let alone in years.

>> It's not so much if a tree falls, it's more a case of if you rob a liquor
>> store and nobody can place you at the scene, you didn't do it in the eyes
>> of any judge.
>
> <chuckle> The last time I checked, Lakehurst NAS used to draw literally
> hundreds of thousands of people, particularly for their Blue Angels
> performances. You gotta work on your analogies, pal.

All those people and nobody to document or witness? And yet the claimant
doesn't appear to be the type to avoid the limelight. Curious. Is the
analogy imperfect? Lets see: lack of witnesses, didn't happen, I hit all the
main points. Oh well, analogies are seldom perfect.

Sorry you didn't like golf, it's a social sport. Driving ranges are not much
like golf, I know some fellows that are pure dynamite on a driving mat who
play fairly poorly. I play mediocre golf, but my partners and I usually
manage to have a pleasant day. Last word to you of course (like I could stop
you!).

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 12:02 AM

> >Congratulations, you've won a T-Shirt.
> >http://ousterhout.net/gallery/I've_been_zoomed.jpg

Hey John:

Can I use a copy of that T-shirt photo at my new website (?)...credit
will be give! New Site below:

www.theextremist.us

BRDB!!!

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 12:21 AM

Dan wrote:

> Better watch out, big guy, I think yawn is lusting after you.
>
> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

ROTFLMAO!

Damn! I don't think I own a flight jacket. I've got a pic of me in a
parka at the top of Pike's Peak and that's about it...

Yawn's only bitching because his name and photo isn't up at
Aero_Schmooz.Scam! Hell, Campbell hides his own photo there so people
won't know what he looks like, come find him and beat his ass royally!

At my websites, I put my name, address, phone number, e-mail addresses
up, and one time, even put maps up one time to where I lived and
invited anyone having a bone to pick with me to just follow the
instructions and come find me!

I think ol' Yawn's upset because of the new website he's contributing
too...

www.theextremist.us

....which reminds me...I got to get my picture up there, too. I've been
fighting fire with fire and slamming their egos by being "more
egotistical than thou" (Yes, deliberately!) putting all my pictures up.
Unshaven, slob, back in the day while in uniform, whatever.

I should really make them weep by putting pictures of my cats's asses
up because my cats' asses have better appearances than their mugs
anyday, especially Campbell.

It's hilarious! No recent photo of me, except maybe one, and Juan's
throwing a tantrum! I'm fifty years old and in most of the pictures
I'm still a kid. At my grandson's train page, I'm going to have a shot
of him with me as his webmaster, and the picture there will be me at
nine years of age!

"Unshaven!" of course, since it seems to turn Yawn on so...

Well, that's what Juan gets for being a liar. We have no shortage of
space here at ILIPS Group International for good writers who are
concerned journalists and tell the truth. We have no room however for
liars like Juan Jimenez, and if I find out he's working for a
legitimate Press, which Aero-News.Net patently is not, I'm going to
have a chat with the Editor, send him some of Juan's dirt, and let's
see how long Juan lasts in the Real World of Journalism.

Yawn's on his way to getting the boot ~ straight up his ass!

He can go down with Campbell; go down on Campbell; I don't care. He's
not a true journalist so he means nothing to me, and him taking me to
task over my websites is one of the funniest things I've ever heard!
That's like Forrest Gump trying to give writer's advice to Tolstoy...

"War and **** Happens!"

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 12:22 AM

Richard Riley wrote:

> Big companies are a hard sell anyway. They're risk averse. Someone
> on their board is going to ask "what happens if one of these airplanes
> crashes into the crowd?" Then they'll ask "What happens if we sponsor
> someone with a 30 year history of mental illness, and HE crashes into
> the crowd?" The answer would be "Gross neglegence and the victims own
> our company."

Right on, Richard!

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 12:26 AM

John Ousterhout wrote:

> Then in one of those GREAT KARMA moments (08-27-99) Zoom was told
> "Conduct yourself accordingly" in court by a Federal Judge.
> http://www.ousterhout.net/zoom/fed-snf.html
>
> I doubt that he appreciated the irony.
>
> John Ousterhout
> rah-14

That's the one! Ousterhout shoots, he scores!

These are the moments of GREAT KARMA that I love:

Juan: Nothing!

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 12:58 AM

Yawnita Jimenez wrote:

>As you can see, each and everyone of you has achieved
>exactly the same result from attacking Jim in front of anyone.

>Squat.

I for one, disagree. Campbell is noticably absent from usenet, though
he used to post his garbage here left and right. He's been cooling his
heels more at more at Aero-Schmooz.Flim-Flam.

He's started putting out more threatening messages as of late, behind
the scenes, meaning something's getting to him because he's been
holding back up until now, an no longer is out front with his critical,
libelous, inane, if not insane, remarks.

Campbell's quiet as the grave right now, most likely because people are
complaining about him and his bad press is getting noticed by sponsors,
the RRL has clearly made two sets of changes to his bio so far to clean
up the stupidity he wrote about himself ~ hasn't worked, though.

All in all, I'd say the pressure of complaints on sponsors and the RRL,
whose leaders have enough troubles of their own to explain in regards
to fraud, insider trading, safety issues, lack of enthusiasm over their
new sport, etc., etc., etc.

I'd say Jimbo has his sock puppet Yawn over here to try and dampen
spirits in his place, so Jimbo doesn't look bad and he can have
plausible deniability over anything of his Yawnita spews, above or
below the belt.

In fact, the very presence of Yawnita here attempting to answer every
criticism of RRL and Campbell ~ and Yawn's the only one talking on
Jimbo's behalf ~ well, as a Publisher, Editor and Writer, who has
observed grass roots movements and Civil Rights fights in the midst,
I'd say your communications ARE getting through and Campbell's taking a
pounding.

In that event, you have to ignore Chewbacca the Yawnita here and keep
those cards and letters coming the RRL's direction. Start actually
writing their sponsors more! The Sponsors are the last people the RRL
wants bothered. Bother them enough and the you'll soon have the RRL's
ear, particularly in regards to Campbell, who is dead weight to them.

They'd be better off using Getty Images, AP, Reuters, for their news
services, rather than Campbell. The fact they use Campbell tells me
their budget is suffering and can't afford professionals, only Jim,
Yawnita and the Amateurs of Aero-Schmooz, who are probably paying them
to represent them (poorly, on both counts!)

Isn't there a movement in regards to quashing Campbell's "Pilot's
Guide" at Oshkosh?

Perhaps it's time to hammer with both organizations, on the very fact
that Campbell is a stalker of women, his employees, others he's worked
with...and ask them if they want that mentality representing them, or
they taking the hit from Women's Advocacy Groups for supporting him.

Both organizations need to be pinned down for an answer: are they
merely an extension of Jim's "Little Rascal's Hee-man Women Haters
Club," or progressive, pro-active, supporters of Women in Aviation.

And that's just one Achilles Heel that Campbell possesses, and he's a
virtual centipede when it comes to negative issues. Ever seen a
centipede fall all over itself without being drunk!? <G>

Makes you wonder if there are going to be any women rocket racers at
RRL, or maybe they share Jim's animousity towards women. That's a
question that needs to be asked, because as it has been pointed out
here, is Campbell an asset to them, or a liability, RRL or Oshkosh
(EAA)?

The more writing and complaining, the more Campbell becomes a
liability, and I believe he is one now as it is...and I think most
share my opinion on that here in this newsgroup.

"Me thinks Jim Campbell has Yawnita over here protesting too much..."

Take a cue from it...your complaints to those associating with the
mentally defective Jim Campbell aren't failing ~ they're working! Why
would Yawnita be here...to admit to yanking chains is to admit to being
sick like Campbell, especially if you note between the lines how much
Yawnita enjoys the "evil" of it.

No, Yawnita is here because your complaints are having an impact and
Jim Campbell is once again threatened.

To paraphrase Fredrick Douglass, "One Gallant Rush" will set you free
of Campbell.

So don't listnen to the Yawnster here...write more, not less!

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 01:02 AM

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 01:19 AM

Richard Riley wrote:

> Of course, that's what made it hillarious when the judge hit him with
> it.

Yeah, you're RIGHT! That's even FUNNIER!

Hell, I don't mind being wrong...now I have new, more insulting write
up I can do on him!

LOL!

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 02:04 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> Tom Cruise you're not, bubba. For another thing, you
> need to understand that creating a ****load of websites using the same
> braindead, ugly template and claiming you're the news service for half the
> world doesn't mean squat in real time. :)

Real Time?

Campbell had to backpedal to claim he had Real Time on the F-35 First
Flight though I had the Press Release up hours after the flight and
before he published. More than twelve hours before!

In Real Time, one is AT the first flight, not reporting it from under
their desk 2000 miles away, while hiding from individuals trying to
confront you about your lies in the Press.

So don't give me any of your **** about Campbell's false advertising in
regards to Real Time. His stories are old before Yahoo gets to them,
and Yahoo doesn't get to them for days. Everyone here knows that so
your lies ain't flying right now, like all the lies you've told before
now in this same thread. You're a dick. You're a liar! You have no
honor! You defend a common criminal and you slap the face of every
veteran that has ever lived by attacking veterans here on this
newsgroup, then by defending an individual who claims to be a Vietnam
Veteran, yet he didn't last six months in the Air Force, and there's
nothing further from the truth!

All he has to do is put his DD Form 214 out there for public viewing
and scrutiny. Otherwise, he's just another fraudulant fool trying to
take glory from the guys that really deserve it, and you're doing
backflips to help him. At least he's sick, what's your excuse,
pudknocker!?

Also, in Real Time, you're broadcasting the news and its not tape
delayed. In news, your report the good and the bad, not just the good
about your friends, and the bad about your/their enemies. That's
Journalism. You don't withhold the truth from The People, and you
never lie to them, as you've been doing here, Juanita.

No wonder you clowns want to chase records your way, not the
established way, the latter being honest, the former being calculated
and completed between a cocktail napkin and Microsoft Flight
Simulation.

As for your Tom Cruise fixation, I do not know where you're coming
from, but you strike me as being awful gay in your "Protection" of your
girlfriend, the prissy Ms. Campbell! Take your wierd fixations
elsewhere...take them over to Jim. I'm sure ~ knowing what kind of man
he is(n't), he'd appreciate them. Put your face down in his lap like
you've been doing and play "Tom Cruise Groupie" with him. It's
gibberish to me...beyond being revealing about your lack of manhood and
its relation to your "employment" at Aero-Loose.Pet.

Or, maybe you should work on your sense of humor. I feel like I'm in a
battle of wits with an unarmed man.

As for the websites, we're still in design and layout on most and just
having fun. We've had a five year plan, it's worked well, and can
extend it if we need. We don't sell advertising, we don't sell
subscriptions, we don't mess around with fancy bells and whistles, and
more importantly, unlike you, Campbell and Aero-Scaro.Blip, which will
someday, "Dissappear from the screen," we don't lie to our readers.

We have a few websites up and operational with the remainder coming
online throughout 2007, www.theextremist.us even before the end of the
month, so if no one at Aero-News.Sluts bothered to tell you that,
you're total and complete ignorance would be understandable, except in
an earlier message, you cited one website; now you're citing a
****load; and you ~ an alleged Journalist ~ still don't have your facts
straight, and apparently still can't read.

And statistically speaking, "****load!?" Can you count better than you
can read or research the facts!? I don't have the confidence in you to
believe that you can. You're so knowledgable, Juanita, why don't you
tell me just how many websites I have!

****load...Jesus Rodrieguez! Give the boy an abacus since he can't
count and can't work a calculator on his computer.

Now, ****bird...I challenge you to come to the source. You want facts,
you won't get them from Campbell and making them up by yourself won't
do....as I said before, you're an Idiot!

My address is all over those websites and my travel plans don't begin
until February, therefore, get your facts straight by going to the
source, Captain Zoom Jr!

That's the same challenge you've been throwing around here like a
medicine ball, so let's see how your own argument works on you.

You might have to take an airplane since, with all your "Aviation
Experience," you can't seem to get one built, let alone flown, but just
the same, walk like you talk. Hop on someone else's completed, tested,
sound, flyable machine ~ something that will only occur in your life,
in your dreams ~ and if you want to know about me, come on down for an
interview. I'll let you all in on what's going to happen to your
girlfriend around Springtime, and unless she likes FBI Agents real
well, it won't be a case of "LOVE!"

The information has to be released anyhow in discovery, so I don't care
if it gets released now or then, but have the balls ~ the cojones as
you call them ~ to come get your facts straight from me.

Frankly, I think you're a coward and you won't show!

So, start reading www.theextremist.us, which is under construction
right now, I'm doing file transfers and linking right now, tonight, and
will be during the week; where you can find much of the same
information that's been on the internet for years, only, this time its
being prepared for use in a Federal Case involving your boss committing
in excess of 40 counts of Federal Perjury in filing a false and
friviolous DMCA Complaint ~ as usual ~ in order to prevent release of
information about his criminal misconduct and also, how he turned his
worthless, yellow back, on a dying man with a legitmate case against
his "new friends" in "Reno," who apparently offered him bribes.

One other thing:

Yawn, you must be spinning like a lathe in his BD-5 right now! On
jacks, that is...

You know, you of all people should thank me for posting so many large
images of teeny tiny airplanes in flight!

Might be the only time you get to see one in flight, considering your
apparent lack of craftmanship contributing to your own parts-o-rama
sitting ~ rotting ~ on the ground for so long...

The funny thing is, if I remember correctly, I think the snowmobile
engine is worth more than the plane designed around it.

Wish I could say the same about the builder on either count! Probably
get your supplies at "No" Value Hardware...

Can't wait til they announce the attempted First Flight of "The Kleco
Bomb" in 2047....I might live that long. But frankly, I'd rather be in
Philadelphia...

You know what they say: "Seen one plane crash and burn, seen them
all!"

So, you probably get your rocks off in your BD-5 by having your friend
Jimbo come over and lift you up in it, to fly you around the yard.

Yeah, no engine, no gas, no quarter slot, no fuselage, no wings, no
instruments, no landing gear, no glory....and how ironic in the engine
department...since that motormouth of yours works not only on Jimbo's
crotch, but frankly, could power the U.S.S. Nimitz!

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 18th 06, 05:27 AM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>> Tom Cruise you're not, bubba. For another thing, you
>> need to understand that creating a ****load of websites using the same
>> braindead, ugly template and claiming you're the news service for half
>> the
>> world doesn't mean squat in real time. :)
>
> Real Time?

Yes. Real Time. You know the concept, right? The world outside your own
self-inflated claims? :)

<mercy snip>

You're a master at verbal diahrrea. I'll give you that. :)

27 paragraphs and not one coherent thought. File that one with FAI, putz! :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 18th 06, 05:27 AM

"Richard Riley" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 18:54:54 -0400, "Juan Jimenez" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Richard Riley" > wrote in message
...
>>> On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 15:45:28 +0000, Chris Wells
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>I don't know about you guys, but whenever I see one of Juan's posts, I
>>>>get a crisp, clear mental image of a small, persistently-yapping
>>>>chihuahua.
>>>>
>>>>I don't think you guys are being fair to him. He seems to be almost as
>>>>mentally unstable as Jim Campbell. Has anyone seen this BD-5J of his
>>>>actually flying?
>>>
>>> I don't think he's ever claimed that it's flown.
>>>
>>> Juan's is an unusual hobby, hooking up with frauds and defending them
>>> against all odds. I can't see that it's profitable, but if he enjoys
>>> it, I suppose that's all that matters.
>>>
>>> On the other hand, maybe he's got enough sense to not actually put his
>>> life on the line, when he's got young offspring to around. It's a
>>> heck of a decision to look your child in the face and tell him you
>>> might not come back from this flight, you might never see him again,
>>> because you want to go fly an impractical airplane for fun.
>>
>>Kinda like some of the rah gaggle and planes flying into the ground
>>because
>>no one could get the engine install right? :)
>>
>>One thing's for sure, you must not have children. And if you do, I hope
>>you
>>don't treatment like your hero did. :)
>
> Ummm... you want to try that in English?

Still confused, Riley? Par for the course.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 18th 06, 05:30 AM

"Richard Riley" > wrote in message
...

> Since I'm building stuff that's going on the RRL airplanes and getting
> paid for it, there's no jealousy here. It's genuine concern.

Do they know it's you? There might be genuine concern there indeed.

> The RRL won't succeed if they get the same sponsors ANN has now
> (especially with Zoom's habit of suing his sponsors). RRL needs a
> whole different group, companies with serious money that are trying to
> get massive exposure. They don't need Hydroswing doors, they need
> Target. Not Avidyne, Burger King. Not Cirrus, Sears.

When you get the governor of New Mexico saying RRL will be bigger than
NASCAR, that kinda gets the ball rolling. Takes time. :)

Are you _that_ upset the closest you're going to come to flying something
like RRL will be the smell of resin?

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 18th 06, 05:31 AM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ps.com...
>
> Yawnita Jimenez wrote:
>
>>As you can see, each and everyone of you has achieved
>>exactly the same result from attacking Jim in front of anyone.
>
>>Squat.
>
>
> I for one, disagree.

And I for one don't give a flying intercourse what you agree or disagree
with, because the facts speak for themselves. :)

<mercy snip, more verbal diahrrea>

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 18th 06, 05:31 AM

"Dan" > wrote in message
...
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> "Dan" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>>> "Dan" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> DABEAR wrote:
>>>>>> john smith wrote:
>>>>>>> I screwed that story up, didn't I?
>>>>>> Nooooooo. Happens to the best of us.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Besides, if you want to read some really screwed up stories, try...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...wait for it...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Aero-News.Scam!
>>>>>>
>>>>> Or yawn's "reporting" on what really happened at S'n'F.
>>>> That's the beauty of it, I didn't have to report anything that day, the
>>>> print and TV media in the Lakeland area did that for us. :)
>>> And they reported the opposite of what campbell and you tell us.
>>
>> I know you have trouble reading. It's ok for you to admit it. :)
> I thought you said you didn't care what I think. If so, why do you keep
> squeaking up?

Sorry to confuse you. that's the sound of my heel. Look up. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 18th 06, 05:35 AM

"Jethro" > wrote in message
...
>
> All those people and nobody to document or witness?

It was 25 years ago. Are you good at detective work? Have fun! :)

> Sorry you didn't like golf, it's a social sport. Driving ranges are not
> much like golf, I know some fellows that are pure dynamite on a driving
> mat who play fairly poorly. I play mediocre golf, but my partners and I
> usually manage to have a pleasant day. Last word to you of course (like I
> could stop you!).

Be glad to.

Puertoricans don't need a sport to socialize, and we don't have to work at
it (or pay for it) to have a pleasant day with our friends. To us, it comes
naturally. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 18th 06, 05:45 AM

BTW, Markyboi, we're still waiting to tell us all about your "aviation
experience." Or are you just yet another wannabe flunkie groupie hanging
behind the fuel cans hoping something will rub off on you? :)

And what's this pompous bull**** on one of your cookie-cutter wannabe
websites?

"Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Images of Light Internet Press Service (ILIPS),
Enchantment State News Service, Topaz State News Service, Centennial State
News Service, Lone Star State News Service, Aloha State News Service, Silver
State News Service, Golden State News Service, Copper State News Service,
Enchantment State Photo News, Centennial State Photo News, Lone Star State
Photo News, Aloha State Photo News, Topaz State Photo News, Silver State
Photo News, Golden State Photo News, Copper State Photo News & Mark S.
'Bear' Daniels "

Copyright 2025? HAHAHAHAH! What is this? Do you, like, wear Ted Turner
shorts and weird **** like that? Not only are you an aviation wannabe, you
also a CNN wannabe? Maybe even an ANN wannabe? <chuckle>

<somebody open the pig trough trapdoor, here he comes with another oral
diahrrea attack...> LMAO! :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 18th 06, 05:50 AM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Dan wrote:
>
>> Better watch out, big guy, I think yawn is lusting after you.
>>
>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>
> Damn! I don't think I own a flight jacket. I've got a pic of me in a
> parka at the top of Pike's Peak and that's about it...

See, Markyboi, that's the problem when your strategy for pretending you're a
big shot journalist is to create all sort of bull**** under-construction
"news service" web sites with absurd copyright statements. Sooner or later
forgetfulness catches up to you and bites a good sized chunk off your
wannabe ass.

Pike's Peak?? HAHAHAH!!! Hell of shot of the "Pike's Peak Marina!" ROFLMAO!
Heck, it's not even a flight jacket, it's a Wannabe Jacket! LOL!

http://www.lonestarstatenews.com/images/daniels_1987_cvr.jpg

<special-ed snip> <chuckle>

Next!

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 18th 06, 06:01 AM

BTW, Markyboi, I hear you were doing your wannabe "journalist" thing and
trying to boycott a supermarket chain in Nevada... LOL!

-------

BOYCOTT!!!
Unfair to Veterans and Disabled Veterans!
First Amendment Violator!
Management Molesters of Women in the workplace via Corporate Condoned Sexual
Harassment!
A Family that Thinks Itself Above the Laws Set Down for All of Us!
An Organized Crime Family Involved in Civil Rights Violations and
Racketeering!
A Family That Pays For It's Abuses Out of Your Pocket!
A Family of Frauds!
BOYCOTT!!!
DON'T SHOP AT SCOLARI'S FOOD & DRUG COMPANY!
Don't let them utilize your money for illicit purposes!

-------

I also heard your "boycott" was successful, until you broke down and waltzed
into the store with a paper bag over your head 'cause you needed some
Preparation-H! LMAO!

This web site is hilarious! http://www.waterworkscase.com/ Last updated
April 13, 2006. <chuckle> Is this what you use as evidence that you're a
"reputable" journalist? LOL! The links don't even work, nimrod! :)

I tell you, Markyboi, you're just a barrel of laughs, and a slamdunk
candidate for FNG in the rah gaggle! Hahahahaha!!! :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 06:47 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> Oh, I get it. You're assuming I give a **** what you think, Markyboi. Toldya
> it was a bad idea for you to try to think. :)

I never assume anything about assholes, Yawnita. They're too damned
predictable...

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 06:50 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> http://www.aero-news.net/news/featurestories.cfm?ContentBlockID=816716A9-6B8C-4352-B653-17ABA431B643&Dynamic=1

Oh, so Campbell sent you here to rehash his grandiose Barnstorming
piece...

Why bother...no one wants to read his lies, let alone yours.

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 07:00 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> I prefer it when other people pay for the ride because they value my work.
> Ever hear of the concept?

Yes, but apparently you haven't. No one values the word or work of a
liar, Yawnita.

> And now you're an expert on who is and isn't a journalist too? :)

Only when it comes to liars...like you and Jimbo, Yawnita.

> <bzzz!> Wrong answer, putz. Photojournalism has to do with associating
> images with news, not collecting aviation pictures, which, as I said, has
> nothing to do with claiming aviation experience.

You need to go back to school, if you've ever been there in the first
place. Photojournalism is much more than you claim. All you have to
do is watch a few of the slide galleries at MSNBC to know that!

And no real journalist takes lessons from liars pretending to be
Journalists, Yawnita.

Speaking of liars, working on a story now about your girlfriend Jimbo
and her false claim to being a Vietnam Veteran.

How does it feel to defend someone guilty of such a charge? Pretty
good?

Not when you get caught in the process...dishonorable mention, Juan
Jimenez, Aero-News.Net.

Anthony W

December 18th 06, 07:00 AM

DABEAR wrote:
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> http://www.aero-news.net/news/featurestories.cfm?ContentBlockID=816716A9-6B8C-4352-B653-17ABA431B643&Dynamic=1
>
> Oh, so Campbell sent you here to rehash his grandiose Barnstorming
> piece...
>
> Why bother...no one wants to read his lies, let alone yours.

Jive Yuan a break, it's hard for him to think for himself with zzzoom'z
hand up his ass.

Tony

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 07:04 AM

Anthony W wrote:

> Jive Yuan a break, it's hard for him to think for himself with zzzoom'z
> hand up his ass.
>
> Tony

Fists of Fury, huh? LOL!!!

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 07:19 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> See, Markyboi, that's the problem when your strategy for pretending you're a
> big shot journalist is to create all sort of bull**** under-construction
> "news service" web sites with absurd copyright statements. Sooner or later
> forgetfulness catches up to you and bites a good sized chunk off your
> wannabe ass.
>
> Pike's Peak?? HAHAHAH!!! Hell of shot of the "Pike's Peak Marina!" ROFLMAO!
> Heck, it's not even a flight jacket, it's a Wannabe Jacket! LOL!
>
> http://www.lonestarstatenews.com/images/daniels_1987_cvr.jpg
>
> <special-ed snip> <chuckle>

THAT's the picture you're referring to!!??

Yawnita, I guess when they handed out the brains you thought they said
"trains" and went behind the door and played with yours!

That's not a flight jacket or even a military leather jacket. The shot
was from 1987 at Catalina Island in California and the jacket was off
the shelf from Wilson's leather!

Get your facts straight, freak. Not everything in the world worn by
people on vacation is a military flight jacket. Jesus, you do have a
Tom Cruise Top Gun fixation/fantasy. Seek therapy! Seek help! Take
Campbell with you!

I don't have a single shot of me in a flight jacket. I wouldn't lower
myself to be so cliche...not like you.

LOL!!!

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 07:22 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>
> You're a master at verbal diahrrea. I'll give you that. :)
>
> 27 paragraphs and not one coherent thought. File that one with FAI, putz! :)

Must have struck a chord with you, though...look how ****y you just
got! Damn! Get that woman a bucket of water and douse her!

Yeah, I figured you couldn't read. Either that, or absent rebuttal,
you're admitting everything is true.

Sucks to be you! LOL!!!

Hey, look...if you want to silence me, just silence yourself. I would
like to get back to work. Somebody's got to make up for the gap you
Faux Journalists create...in the truth.

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 07:27 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> And I for one don't give a flying intercourse what you agree or disagree
> with, because the facts speak for themselves. :)
>
> <mercy snip, more verbal diahrrea>

DAMN, you're ****y tonight! Time of the month again, Yawnita!? Oh, I
know!

You and Jim ain't having sex regularly!

It is that time! Yeah, yeah, yeah...I knew it!

It's time for Yawnita to go buy some batteries for her marital aid...

....the BD-5J!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Still won't fly! LOL!!!

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 07:32 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> Are you _that_ upset the closest you're going to come to flying something
> like RRL will be the smell of resin?

Better than an unbuilt Bede that's never smelled "flight" and never
will! LOL!!!

Don't get ****y, now! Not my fault you didn't go to Embry Riddle! And
if you did, not my fault that you didn't learn a damned thing while you
were there! HA!

Yeah, if I were you, I'd forget about Klecos and Resin...get yourself
some charcoal lighter and some hot wing sauce and have at it! A BD-5J
tastes better than crow...so I hear! :)

And could be worse...at least you weren't building an EMU!

ROTFLMAO!!!

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 07:41 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> BTW, Markyboi, we're still waiting to tell us all about your "aviation
> experience." Or are you just yet another wannabe flunkie groupie hanging
> behind the fuel cans hoping something will rub off on you? :)

Oh, hell, boy...you been jacking your jaw talking about things you
claim to know about me but don't. And I ain't about to spell out my
Aviation Experience to you because the next thing I know, you'll be on
my doorstep begging me to help you with that friggin' BD-NOFLY!

HA!

Man-oh-man, Yawnita, you are a HOOT tonight!

> And what's this pompous bull**** on one of your cookie-cutter wannabe
> websites?
>
> "Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Images of Light Internet Press Service (ILIPS),
> Enchantment State News Service, Topaz State News Service, Centennial State
> News Service, Lone Star State News Service, Aloha State News Service, Silver
> State News Service, Golden State News Service, Copper State News Service,
> Enchantment State Photo News, Centennial State Photo News, Lone Star State
> Photo News, Aloha State Photo News, Topaz State Photo News, Silver State
> Photo News, Golden State Photo News, Copper State Photo News & Mark S.
> 'Bear' Daniels "
>
> Copyright 2025? HAHAHAHAH! What is this? Do you, like, wear Ted Turner
> shorts and weird **** like that? Not only are you an aviation wannabe, you
> also a CNN wannabe? Maybe even an ANN wannabe? <chuckle>

Ah, **** No! CNN is past its prime already. Repetitive, like ANN and
Campbell, with his bull**** Barnstorming story, and ANN is a career
killer! Look at Campbell! LOL!!! Hell, look at you!

ROTFLMAO!

No, I may be honest, but I'm lazy. I got sick of changing the year
every year! HA!

> <somebody open the pig trough trapdoor, here he comes with another oral
> diahrrea attack...> LMAO! :)

That's funny: the "Pig Trough Trapdoor!" Did your momma give your
mouth that foul name? Pretty brave to admit it here! But, I guess
that's the first truthful reference you've made in regards to eating
Campbell's ass.

Hey, boy...you know that won't look good on a resume, right!? But you
do it anyway....hmm.

Sort of like the honey wagon driver who was told to quit. His
response:

"WHAT! AND GIVE UP FLYING!?"

LOL!!!

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 08:02 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> BTW, Markyboi, I hear you were doing your wannabe "journalist" thing and
> trying to boycott a supermarket chain in Nevada... LOL!

You're kind of people, Juan? You looked more like a Piggly Wiggly man
to me...

> I also heard your "boycott" was successful, until you broke down and waltzed
> into the store with a paper bag over your head 'cause you needed some
> Preparation-H! LMAO!

That's more your style, Juan...everyone here knows that. Jimbo sure
does...: )

>
> This web site is hilarious! http://www.waterworkscase.com/ Last updated
> April 13, 2006. <chuckle> Is this what you use as evidence that you're a
> "reputable" journalist? LOL! The links don't even work, nimrod! :)

Yeah, we kind of had to put that one on hold, seeing as your girlfriend
Jimbo betrayed one of the Plaintiffs in that case. The poor guy died
before getting justice out of those Reno freaks your girlfriend
associates with now. And we're planning to redesign the site, put up a
tribute to our friend, and then your girlfriend is going to answer for
her greed in selling out three worthy individuals with good cases each.
And you're going to be exposed for aiding and abetting her.

Tough ****, kid!

> I tell you, Markyboi, you're just a barrel of laughs, and a slamdunk
> candidate for FNG in the rah gaggle! Hahahahaha!!! :)

I'm sorry, but that is high praise! I didn't expect that from you,
Juan. Thanks!

Yeah, I'd love to be associated with that group, but ~ I don't think
they'd allow a low life like you on the nominating committee, and I
think the group is closed because there's only one RAH-15, there will
only ever be one RAH-15, and they have more Class than you because they
know better than to associate with scum like Jim Campbell and his lying
Aero-News.Net...especially for personal profit and gain, which makes me
wonder what you're doing here since, if you were profiting and gaining
at Aero-News, you wouldn't NEED to be here!

That's pretty funny in a sense, but also rather sick and sad about you.
But not surprising, since if you think about it, only two types of
people come here:

Those that aspire.

Those who are complete failures and think they have license to
criticize those whom aspire.

And as for RAH-15, they wouldn't turn their backs on anyone needing
justice, especially not a dying man. Your friend did, and you defend
him and criticize good men in the process. You defend a cowardly loser
who claims to be a Vietnam Veteran ~ wounded in action ~ who never
stepped foor in the Nam.

What does that make you, Juan?

You will go down with him. You and Campbell will go down together.
And you remember my face from those pictures. Might be the smartest
thing you ever do in your worthless, evil, small-minded, pathetic,
meanignless life.

Because I'll tell you what...where Campbell is, I know you'll be. My
friend died in May. Campbell's greed and cowardice denied him justice.
Campbell's going to pay. So are you.

Avenging lost friends...gives a man new meaning! Running from
Avengers, puts blisters on cowards feet...you both get yourselves some
good running shoes...

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 18th 06, 03:30 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ps.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> http://www.aero-news.net/news/featurestories.cfm?ContentBlockID=816716A9-6B8C-4352-B653-17ABA431B643&Dynamic=1
>
> Oh, so Campbell sent you here to rehash his grandiose Barnstorming
> piece...
>
> Why bother...no one wants to read his lies, let alone yours.

Especially when all you yapping mutts say he should have registered the
record with FAI, when in fact FAI did not begin accepting records in the
microlight category until 1984.

> Dear Sir,
>
> A quick search in our database shows that the first microlight record
> approved was a 'distance in a straight line' flight made by Jonathan
> DAVIES (UK) on 3rd
> March 1984. Details are available at
> http://records.fai.org/microlight/history.asp?id1=RAL1&id2=84
>
> I hope this information helps.

Way to go, nimrod.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 18th 06, 03:34 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> I prefer it when other people pay for the ride because they value my
>> work.
>> Ever hear of the concept?
>
> Yes, but apparently you haven't. No one values the word or work of a
> liar, Yawnita.

Is that why you're running around in a wannabe flight suit?

Sorry to burst your bubble, but I get paid $1000 a day just to talk +
expenses. I teach, in Puerto Rico, the mainland and overseas, on IT
management subjects.'

You, on the otherhand, wear a leash and yap like a little dog. :)

> You need to go back to school, if you've ever been there in the first
> place. Photojournalism is much more than you claim. All you have to
> do is watch a few of the slide galleries at MSNBC to know that!

And of course, since you're such a respected journalist, you think you can
teach anyone what the subject is? BZZZT! Wrong answer again, nimrod. You
see, there is a person in my family who, unlike you, is a true
photojournalist. Here, nimrod, read the description of this photo, this is
what true photojournalists do. This one happens to be my brother.

http://imagery.gettyimages.com/YIF2006/source/gallery.aspx?section=nws&gallery=18&slide=4&stslide=1

Sit on that one while I whittle you another one, dip****. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 18th 06, 03:35 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>> See, Markyboi, that's the problem when your strategy for pretending
>> you're a
>> big shot journalist is to create all sort of bull**** under-construction
>> "news service" web sites with absurd copyright statements. Sooner or
>> later
>> forgetfulness catches up to you and bites a good sized chunk off your
>> wannabe ass.
>>
>> Pike's Peak?? HAHAHAH!!! Hell of shot of the "Pike's Peak Marina!"
>> ROFLMAO!
>> Heck, it's not even a flight jacket, it's a Wannabe Jacket! LOL!
>>
>> http://www.lonestarstatenews.com/images/daniels_1987_cvr.jpg
>>
>> <special-ed snip> <chuckle>
>
> THAT's the picture you're referring to!!??
>
> Yawnita, I guess when they handed out the brains you thought they said
> "trains" and went behind the door and played with yours!
>
> That's not a flight jacket or even a military leather jacket.

No ****, dip****. That's why I toldya it's a Wannabe Jacket, putz. Can't
even read now, eh? :)

Next! :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 18th 06, 03:37 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>
>> You're a master at verbal diahrrea. I'll give you that. :)
>>
>> 27 paragraphs and not one coherent thought. File that one with FAI, putz!
>> :)
>
> Must have struck a chord with you, though...look how ****y you just
> got! Damn! Get that woman a bucket of water and douse her!

LOL! You're the one going ape**** with kilometric diahrrea's, Markyboi. Look
in the mirror, if you can stand it. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 18th 06, 03:39 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>> Are you _that_ upset the closest you're going to come to flying something
>> like RRL will be the smell of resin?
>
> Better than an unbuilt Bede that's never smelled "flight" and never will!
> LOL!!!

POP! There goes another Nimrod Markyboi bubble! HAHAHAHAH!!!

http://www.bd5.com/airworthy.pdf

This is just too easy. Like taking candy from a yapping chihuahua. <chuckle>

We're still waiting for your "aviation experience," putz!

Next! :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 18th 06, 03:47 PM

"Richard Riley" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 01:30:26 -0400, "Juan Jimenez" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Richard Riley" > wrote in message
...
>>
>>> Since I'm building stuff that's going on the RRL airplanes and getting
>>> paid for it, there's no jealousy here. It's genuine concern.
>>
>>Do they know it's you? There might be genuine concern there indeed.
>>
>
> Uh, yeah. At least, the check is made out to me.

Yeah, that's what they all say. :)

> Like I said, I want to see them succeed. Having a nutball with a 30 year
> nutball track
> record as their public face is a bad idea.

I know, that's why you're not their public face. If RRL ever got wind of
your thread postings here they would be even less inclined to consider you
for that latrine duty...

> How about John Conrad? Don't know him? Heck of a story. He's
> believable too, a former Sheriff's deputy who became an Episcopal
> Priest.

Hate to burst your bubble but "priests" are not exactly the most believable
people these days.

Don't tell me. You voted for Foley. :)

>>When you get the governor of New Mexico saying RRL will be bigger than
>>NASCAR, that kinda gets the ball rolling. Takes time. :)
>
> Yeah, 'cause ya know, Governors of small, impoverished states are
> experts on popular entertainment.

I'll make sure and remind RRL and the governor's office that one of their
contractors said that. :)

>>Are you _that_ upset the closest you're going to come to flying something
>>like RRL will be the smell of resin?
>
> Since my airplane is a) significantly faster than theirs (they're
> limited by the Velocity's Vne)

D-OH! So was Rutan and his XCOR-powered Ez, but obviously that wasn't even
NEAR the point, was it? ROFLMAO! :)

> c) I've gotten repeated offers to buy mine and convert it to a rocket
> plane

Oh, that's precious. If I remember correctly there are three companies
considering building BD-5R's with the short A wings. :)

Trust me, RRL pilot destined to be you are not, young paduan. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 18th 06, 03:48 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>
>
>> Oh, I get it. You're assuming I give a **** what you think, Markyboi.
>> Toldya
>> it was a bad idea for you to try to think. :)
>
> I never assume anything about assholes
> They're too damned predictable...

Okdok, you're now official the expert on predictable assholes. Go forth and
investigate, Markyboi. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 18th 06, 03:51 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
oups.com...

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> BTW, Markyboi, we're still waiting to tell us all about your "aviation
> experience." Or are you just yet another wannabe flunkie groupie hanging
> behind the fuel cans hoping something will rub off on you? :)

> Oh, hell, boy...you been jacking your jaw talking about things you
> claim to know about me but don't. And I ain't about to spell out my
> aviation Experience to you because the next thing I know, you'll be on
> my doorstep begging me to help you with that friggin' BD-NOFLY!

In other words, the translation... "I better shut my trap, tuck my tail
between my legs and run like hell before I make an idiot of myself and
confirm I'm just a flight line wannabe, nothing but the gas boy."

> Copyright 2025? HAHAHAHAH! What is this? Do you, like, wear Ted Turner
> shorts and weird **** like that? Not only are you an aviation wannabe, you
> also a CNN wannabe? Maybe even an ANN wannabe? <chuckle>

> Ah, **** No! CNN is past its prime already. Repetitive, like ANN and
> Campbell, with his bull**** Barnstorming story, and ANN is a career
> killer!

Repetitive???? HAHAHAHA!!!! All we have to do to discern the meaning of
"repetitive" is take a look at your prepubescent websites! :)

> That's funny: the "Pig Trough Trapdoor!" Did your momma give your
> mouth that foul name?

Yup, she made it just for you, nimrod. :)

And we're stiiiiilllll waiting for the slightest inkling of aviation
experience (other than standing next to Panavia Tornado's with a dip****
look on your face). LOL! :)

Next! :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 18th 06, 04:03 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
>> This web site is hilarious! http://www.waterworkscase.com/ Last updated
>> April 13, 2006. <chuckle> Is this what you use as evidence that you're a
>> "reputable" journalist? LOL! The links don't even work, nimrod! :)
>
> Yeah, we kind of had to put that one on hold, seeing as your girlfriend
> Jimbo betrayed one of the Plaintiffs in that case.

Unhuh. That must be why virtually none of the links work, eh? Seems to me
like it was put on hold for you with a size 12 boot. Bull****us Interruptus,
the call it. :)

>> I tell you, Markyboi, you're just a barrel of laughs, and a slamdunk
>> candidate for FNG in the rah gaggle! Hahahahaha!!! :)
>
> I'm sorry, but that is high praise! I didn't expect that from you,
> Juan. Thanks!

No problem, I'm sure you'll get a kick about being appointed the RAH Mascot.
We've even got a photograph of you already to suit your new job! :)

http://www.bd5.com/images/rah_gaggle_mascot.jpg

Hell, even the angle of the pic is perfect for ya. :)

<mercy snip due to the predictable ape**** diahrrea attack...> :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 18th 06, 04:07 PM

"Mike Hogan" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 10:50:21 -0400, "Juan Jimenez" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Mike Hogan" > wrote in message
...
>>> On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 21:06:09 -0400, "Juan Jimenez" >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Mike Hogan" > wrote in message
...
>>>>> On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 09:55:53 -0400, "Juan Jimenez" >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"DABEAR" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <snipped>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Some things not included in the FAI's categories:
>>>>>>
>>>>>><mercy snipped>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Any aviation-related records on issues such as:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>- size
>>>>>>- weight
>>>>>>- capacity
>>>>>>- feats of strength associated with or performed with aircraft
>>>>>>- repetition records associated with aircraft
>>>>>>- anything not covered by FAI categories but clearly aviation-related
>>>>>
>>>>> Mr. Jimenez, does any orgaization, anwhere, not controlled by Mr.
>>>>> Campbell, recognize Mr. Campbell's record as a current or past record?
>>>>> It's a simple question.
>>>>
>>>>Go ask Mr. Campbell, Mike. Why come to me when you can go to the source?
>>>>:)
>>>
>>> I did, 3 days ago. He hasn't answered. That's why I asked you. You
>>> seem to know a lot about him, I thought you might know.
>>
>>Nope, sorry. He's the source. :)
>>
>>> I've also asked the reference librarian at the URL (which used to mean
>>> University Research Library, back in the day) and he's a pilot so he's
>>> familiar with NAA and FAI, he looked through his databases and
>>> couldn't find anything.
>>
>>That's been discussed here as well.
>>
>>> So, since Mr. Campbell isn't answering, do you believe that any
>>> orgaization has recognized his record?
>>
>>That may depend on whether or not any organization was keeping track of
>>microlight records back in 1981. I can't find any references to any
>>microlight records that far back in either NAA or FAI, nor can I even find
>>the date when the CIMA commission was created.
>
> CIMA was created in 1979. The first microlight records were awarded in
> 1981 for flights in 1980. They awarded the first The Colibri Diploma
> to Steve Hunt in 1983.

My information, which came directly from FAI this morning, is that the first
microlight record was awarded in 1984, not 1981.

>> When did FAI start accepting and recording records in the microlight
>> category? What year?
>
> Dear Sir,
>
> A quick search in our database shows that the first microlight record
> approved was a 'distance in a straight line' flight made by Jonathan
> DAVIES (UK) on 3rd
> March 1984. Details are available at
>
> http://records.fai.org/microlight/history.asp?id1=RAL1&id2=84
>
> I hope this information helps.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 04:22 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> Except for the fact that you can ask to be removed from public records that
> state you have a license. Go look up Jim in the FAA pilot database. He's not
> there, but he definitely has a pilot's license, I have seen it.
>
> Juan

Well, the real questions is, with all these claims of him flying so
many thousands of hours, is he actually using that license or are the
hours faked...

....have you also seen his logbooks? Can he back up every flight
claimed with his, own, written record?

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 04:27 PM

Richard Riley wrote:

> On the other hand, maybe he's got enough sense to not actually put his
> life on the line, when he's got young offspring to around. It's a
> heck of a decision to look your child in the face and tell him you
> might not come back from this flight, you might never see him again,
> because you want to go fly an impractical airplane for fun.

Oh, that ain't so much the problem. The problem is when you're telling
your kid this for the millionth time, ten years later, and the parts
are still in the box, and he's going off to college...

....will he think you insincere!?

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 18th 06, 04:27 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> Except for the fact that you can ask to be removed from public records
>> that
>> state you have a license. Go look up Jim in the FAA pilot database. He's
>> not
>> there, but he definitely has a pilot's license, I have seen it.
>>
>> Juan
>
> Well, the real questions is, with all these claims of him flying so
> many thousands of hours, is he actually using that license or are the
> hours faked...

You're the expert on claiming aviation experience, why don't you ask him? :)

> ...have you also seen his logbooks? Can he back up every flight
> claimed with his, own, written record?

Can you back up any aviation experience of yours with any documentation,
putz? :)

You see, cowards like you who turn tail and grow yellow stripes when asked
to back up their saliva about "aviation experience" with facts do not rate
any explanations. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

ChuckSlusarczyk

December 18th 06, 04:34 PM

In article >, Al G says...
>
>
>"John Ousterhout" > wrote in message
>news:fbhhh.274084$FQ1.4251@attbi_s71...
>> Al G wrote:
>>> I got an email from Zoom yesterday. Beyond the usual stuff: threats,
>>> get a lawyer, besmirched his rep, I made false claims, etc.
>>
>> Congratulations, you've won a T-Shirt.
>> http://ousterhout.net/gallery/I've_been_zoomed.jpg
>>
>> Wear it proudly.
>>
>> John Ousterhout
>> - rah-14
>
>No **** John? Damn, I'm, well, Honored. I'd like to thank my parents, and
>teachers, and all the little people that made my rise to ultimate success a
>reality.
>
>By the way, I got another nasty gram. What is "Tortuous Interference"
>anyway? I wish Tony was here...

Gee
I go Deer Hunting for a few days and all this fun happens. I shot a World Record
Doe last week at a hunting show.I took pictures but they didn't come out.And I
cut it up and ate it before I knew the pictures were bad...Darn,... But'it's the
truth ...Honest!!
A World Record by the Greatest Hunting Aviator ever .Over 17,000 deer since I
was 13 HONEST!! The last one did a loop and a roll before spinning down the hill
ANOTHER WORLD RECORD for shot Deer in an aerobatic performance. HONEST!! Ask my
friend Pancho he'll swear to it !!He hold's the record for the slowest flying
small jet.Its so sloow that the wheels have only moved 5" in the last 10 years
during it's take off roll.WOW WHAT A RECORD!!

Al G I see you contacted zoom at jauns request and got his answer to your
question.So congrats to you on your "I've been zoomed" award your now a member
of the "zoomed and survived fraternity" "the many,the proud the zoomed". The
list is a who's who of aviation be proud, for now you know the thrill of being
told the stirring phrases "Tortuous Interference,guilty of slander and govern
yourself accordingly" among others. Wear it proudly.

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 04:36 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> You're the expert on claiming aviation experience, why don't you ask him? :)

Plan to! His Attorneys as well. It's called a subpoena.

> Can you back up any aviation experience of yours with any documentation,
> putz? :)

Sure can...they can get that in discovery as well.

> You see, cowards like you who turn tail and grow yellow stripes when asked
> to back up their saliva about "aviation experience" with facts do not rate
> any explanations. :)

Like I said, my address is all over those websites. Come visit in
person and see the record. Then talk to me about cowardice...

And just the same, we've got to get the new masthead completed for all
the sites, so I'll make sure to include as much of the record there as
I can. Needs to be there anyway...

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 04:41 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> One thing's for sure, you must not have children. And if you do, I hope you
> don't treatment like your hero did. :)

You want to give us another lecture on English Grammer? Also, isn't
Puertoricans as you have it spelled, two words: Puerto Ricans.

Is Jimbo the Rocket Clown back teaching college ~ English as a second
language?

God help Puerto Rico!

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 04:45 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> If you think Tim was the one keeping Jim stable... man, all I can tell you
> is the depth of your ignorance is absolutely astounding.

Ahhh, so ALL of his writers finally got in there and held him down!

Now, what about this ecoli that he's been feeding you, Juan? Is that
why you act so high? "Socializing" with Jim?

Anthony W

December 18th 06, 04:46 PM

DABEAR wrote:
> Anthony W wrote:
>
>> Jive Yuan a break, it's hard for him to think for himself with zzzoom'z
>> hand up his ass.
>>
>> Tony
>
> Fists of Fury, huh? LOL!!!

I think of him as a ventriloquist's dummy and zzzoom has his hand up the
ass wiggling his fingers to make yuan speak...

Tony

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 04:49 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> Okdok, you're now official the expert on predictable assholes. Go forth and
> investigate, Markyboi. :)

Well, we could poll the newsgroup here and see if I'm right or wrong
about you and Jim?

Seeing as how they're "good men" unlike you and Jim, I don't know what
their answer will be?

Care to take a chance?

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 05:27 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> Is that why you're running around in a wannabe flight suit?

Prove that it's a flight suit or a wannabe one, Juan. I sure as hell
wasn't at the airport. And I don't own a box of BD-5J parts,
unaproved, and walk around my living room in a flight suit telling my
son how I'm gonna die in the damned thing! LOL!

> Sorry to burst your bubble, but I get paid $1000 a day just to talk +
> expenses. I teach, in Puerto Rico, the mainland and overseas, on IT
> management subjects.'

Well, that's pretty darned good, Juan. So, what'cha doing here?
ROTFLMAOx10!!!

> You, on the otherhand, wear a leash and yap like a little dog. :)

Isn't this plagarism, Yawn. I mean seriously, didn't someone make
reference to you as a yapping little dog in an earlier post? You got
anything original to come back with? Does the "J" in BD-5J mean "Juan"
or "Jerkoff" or both?

> And of course, since you're such a respected journalist, you think you can
> teach anyone what the subject is?

Never said that...is that what Journalists do, Juan...they put words
into other people's mouths? And Plagarize? And lie? And defend
known criminals?

>BZZZT! Wrong answer again, nimrod. You
> see, there is a person in my family who, unlike you, is a true
> photojournalist. Here, nimrod, read the description of this photo, this is
> what true photojournalists do. This one happens to be my brother.
>
> http://imagery.gettyimages.com/YIF2006/source/gallery.aspx?section=nws&gallery=18&slide=4&stslide=1

I see no photo credit indicating your brother took the shot. I see
Jose Jimenez ~ that tells me Bill Dana took the shot. Seriously
Juan...how many Jose Jimenez' are there in the World? In Puerto Rico?
In New York State? Florida?

I mean, you lie so much Juan, who's going to believe you? And how many
other shots has your bother taken? Especially for Getty? We need
facts. We need verifiable proof. Otherwise, you're already no better
than Jim Campbell, when it comes to lying, and claiming the service of
others.

And man, if I were making $100.00 teaching a day, I sure wouldn't be
here. And the only reason I am here, is to glean information about
you. I got a story coming up to go with all them pictures, and all the
other information I have about you and your boss.

> Sit on that one while I whittle you another one, dip****. :)

Sophisticated, $100.00 an hour teacher, spending his precious time and
money on usenet, defending a known criminal who claims to be a Vietnam
Veteran but isn't; claims to have a brother who epitomizes
photojournalism but hasn't read a single volume of "Best of
Photojournalism" to know that he is already rebutted in his statement
that "all Photojournalism associates Photography with News," has
himself never worked a day in Journalism or Photojournalism, seeing as
he has already violated Journalistic Ethics by lying, as has his boss,
a fraud; claims to "Travel the World" teaching, yet offers no
verifiable, documentable proof; possesses poor English grammar while
criticizing that of others;

....and can't get the smallest airplane in the World built, despite
earning $100.00 an hour traveling the World teaching! I mean, with
that kind of money, you could PAY someone to finish it for you! Hell,
the damned thing is so small, you could put it in your carry-on, take
it with you, finish it on the road, and fly it home!

You're a big talker Juan, but like your boss, proof is in the pudding.

And as for waiting for you to whittle your turds, man I'll be a
skeleton with my dust mixed into the keyboard here, if I have to wait
the time it takes you to whittle Turds and build BD-5Js!

And for someone who is Puerto Rican and espouses socializing and happy
times ~ and I knew a great man from Puerto Rico, who saved the lives of
two pilots in my unit at unbelievable risk to his own, one of the most
pleasant and happiest men on Earth ~ I don't exactly think you're a
very social human being by being here on this website, attacking people
because you enjoy the evil of it, and bathe in evil by defending your
girlfriend the criminal James R. Campbell.

I don't see where there's any honor or joy or happiness in anything you
do, embracing evil like you do. Being unsocial as you are. Lacking
social skills so much that he believes he can pull the wool over the
eyes of others with illogical conclusions, that are not coincidentally,
the same tactics and Modus Operandi of his teacher, the criminal James
R. Campbell.

Who do you think you're fooling here, Juan? The people on this
newsgroup are the very people who know when the Omnipotent have
arrived, and how much the Omnipotent really know, when they're writing
up illogical conclusions.

1) I travel the World teaching at $100.00 per hour +!
2) Why am I here at this newsgroup spewing filth in regards to things
I know nothing about, and people whom I know nothing about, because if
have no social skills and am a Troll who likes to visit newsgroups and
harass the good people there!!??

Juan, you not only DON'T KNOW your ass from a hole in the ground, but
you can't even eyeball a civilian produced leather jacket having no
relation or even correlation to a Military issue Flight Jacket, in
contrast to the real thing.

How stupid can you be!?

More than your teacher, the criminal James R. Campbell, Faux Journalist
and lying Publisher/Editor of Aero-News.Net, a corporate mouthpiece for
anyone who will pay Campbell to be so?

Don't let that happen Juan. Change your ways...before it's too late.
And I have a feeling it's too late already, but I think human beings
should give other human beings one last chance before it's too late.

An accessory to fruad, or a $100.00 an hour teacher?

What you would have us believe would render us totally, mentally,
incompetant. So what does that make you for spewing your lies and your
grandiose Social Level here at a newsgroup for Rec.Aviation.Homebuilts?

Do you see any logic in that? I sure don't.

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 05:37 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> I'll give that... umm... 0.3 on a scale of one to 10. :)

High praise again!? Damn, Juan, you even hand out high praise when
you're ****y?

I don't know about the rest of you, but he's being pretty good to me!

Better not let Campbell find that out! You'll have to go back to your
$100.00 an hour teaching job (And yes, I know you said $1,000.00," but
this is too rich to resist! LOL!

You got to figure Juan...suppose you were traveling the World teaching
at only $100.00" an hour. That's a good wage and you can still have
someone else build your BD-5J for you.

But a thousand dollars an hour, Juan, and no BD-5J to show for it. And
all the time spent on usenet trying to lie your way into a Social
position so elevated it would give SR-71 pilots nosebleeds?

Think, before you speak, Juan. The more grandiose you become, the
easier it is to spot you as a liar.

Campbell teaches you everything he knows and still you know nothing?

Now, I've just got to wonder why that is...LOL!

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 05:42 PM

Anthony W wrote:

> I think of him as a ventriloquist's dummy and zzzoom has his hand up the
> ass wiggling his fingers to make yuan speak...
>
> Tony

Actually, Tony, I think you're pretty close, but when one, like Juan,
is a sellout to a fraud and criminal like Campbell, by now, Juan is
taught to stick his own hand up his own ass and wiggle his fingers like
Campbell would.

When you're an apprentice of James R. Campbell, that's what a good
apprentice does!

And for less than $1,000.00 an hour!

Gotta hurt! In more ways than one! LOL!!!

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 05:53 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> Especially when all you yapping mutts say he should have registered the
> record with FAI, when in fact FAI did not begin accepting records in the
> microlight category until 1984.

No Juan, we're merely saying that if he truly wanted to set a record,
why not approach the NAA or the FAI, create the new category, then set
the record?

Otherwise, he's just jerking off, and it's not a record he remains
quiet about, a personal best kind of thing that one guy knows he's done
something no one else so far has been capable of, and he warms himself
in private glow from the fires of that fact; Jimbo's trying to claim
credit for something that was never verified nor was any real attempt
made to verify it, because even as Jimbo might tell you, were he a Real
Journalist, the Press can be called in to verify such attempts...but
the FAI is still the sanctioning authority in the end. But at least
you have the Press behind you!

Now how dumb was that for the Master Journalist James R. Campbell NOT
to have the Press on standby for a record attempt, even if the FAI had
no interest in the event?

On the yapping Mutt issue, you should stop plagiarizing right now. Not
befitting a Journalist, Juan. Of course, we're still waiting to see
real Journalism out of Aero-News.Net, instead of that paid for
advertising you guys call Journalism. And your plagiarizms.

Also, double-edged sword. For me to have Aviation Experience, I must
show you documented information? Is that how it works?

I want all of ANN to provide me with their documented Aviation
Experience and I'll gladly do the same for them.

The demand on me was made recently, so I'll need some time.

The demand on you boyz and girlz (especially your boss) was made
decades ago...why haven't you produced your records? The logbooks, the
Certificates, the Medicals, the Airmen's Certificate in particular?

All of ANN...not just you, not just Jimbo, but all of ANN.

Kind of up's the ante, dont'cha think!? <G>

anon

December 18th 06, 06:35 PM

I think the RRL would like to hear from us.

Maybe, I'll hear from Campbell again, like after I gave an overseas magazine
the heads-up on Zoom after he was announced as a columnist.

Jim, why don't you call me on a Sunday, like you did before, while I was
visiting my dying grandmother.

Ace

Anthony W

December 18th 06, 06:48 PM

DABEAR wrote:
> Anthony W wrote:
>
>
>> I think of him as a ventriloquist's dummy and zzzoom has his hand up the
>> ass wiggling his fingers to make yuan speak...
>>
>> Tony
>
> Actually, Tony, I think you're pretty close, but when one, like Juan,
> is a sellout to a fraud and criminal like Campbell, by now, Juan is
> taught to stick his own hand up his own ass and wiggle his fingers like
> Campbell would.
>
> When you're an apprentice of James R. Campbell, that's what a good
> apprentice does!
>
> And for less than $1,000.00 an hour!
>
> Gotta hurt! In more ways than one! LOL!!!

I'm still not 100% sure yuanita exists and isn't an on-line persona of
old zzzoomer himself. I've never been zoomed but my company doesn't
sell aviation products...

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 06:56 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> "DABEAR" > wrote in message
> ups.com...
> > Yawn wrote:
> >
> >>Nice try, but not even close. Jim doesn't read usenet. And all I get a
> >>kick
> >>out of is yanking the chains and watching the rah monkeys jump up and
> >>down.
> >>:)
> >
> > It's been documented that Campbell has posted here before.
>
> You think, retard? LOL!

Actually, I know. Here's an archived link:

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.aviation.homebuilt/msg/b265fb5ad6d56bcb

I'm not sure if you've heard of it, especially considering that you
only recently heard of me and had to backpeddal quickly to try and get
"dirt" on me that you criticize me with here at this newsgroup. But
hell, I'll give you credit, because unlike you're boss, you at least go
searching for facts before you abuse and misuse the same!

That's an attaboy ~ take it ~ you EARNED it! Your boss, the criminal
James R. Campbell, hasn't.

Anyhow, to make a short story long, try http://www.ousterhout.net and
read about Captain Zoom there. At a mimimum, there are three links
regarding Zoom's responses to his critics and on USENET! Check those
out, and you will have your facts straight. Your boss has been on
usenet, but may not have imparted that knowledge to you, and further,
may have withheld it from you...as he does with so many others.

Especially when he's attacking CGS (past reference) but not mentioning
about his own inflated circulation figures, with which he was swindling
CGS and others out of Advertising revenue, and further, how he

1) defrauds people with such figures, was challenged, and was
2)in the process of getting caught, then
3)has a knee jerk reaction, and goes immediately to cover for whiners
and complainers with highly questionable (potentially immoral) "beefs"
against Chuck S, so as to divert attention from himself in regards to
his criminal fraud, while at the same time,
4)binding Chuck S's hands in such a litagious manner, that Chuck S has
to deal with the complainers and can't mount an offense against the
criminal James R. Campbell,
5) all because Campbell has an unfair and inappropriately, unethically
used advantage over Chuck S ~ Campbell has a publication with which he
can fool others until he gets caught. 6) Not the same for Chuck S has
no publication, therefore cannot rebut Campbell's comments in the same
Public Forum, so
7) he's double-screwed by this fraud, liar and libeller, the criminal
James R. Campbell, and the con man Campbell gets away with another
crime.

Let's not forget, this has been his Modus Operandi since the age of
seventeen. So Campbell has criminal experience in advance and because
of it, and his position as a "Journalist," which is take, he none the
less has the element of surprise in that, he's behind Journalism's
reputation for being fair and unbiased, while he himself is nothing
more or less than a viper; a snake.

So, you need to do better at checking your facts Juan, but like I
said...at least you check something before you twist, manipulate, use
and abuse those facts in your facetious attacks on others. Because
that's all your attacks are when you take facts and twist the truth out
of them...facetious. Meaningless. Lies even.

So, if we could get you to stop doing the latter, you might give up
your $1000.00 an hour phantom teaching job and become a Real
Journalist, before it's too late.

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 07:02 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> LOL! You're the one going ape**** with kilometric diahrrea's, Markyboi. Look
> in the mirror, if you can stand it. :)

Hey ~ if you don't have the attentions span or perhaps possess a
learning disorder, that doesn't make me the ****y one. I have no
reason to be frustrated other than to watch an individual such as
yourself throw his good reputation away.

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 07:07 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> This is just too easy. Like taking candy from a yapping chihuahua. <chuckle>
>
> We're still waiting for your "aviation experience," putz!

Juan, that entry was made one year ago. Have you flown it yet? Do you
have pictures of you and it at the same time ~ you in the cockpit ~ in
flight?

Simple question...just like Jimbo's medical can be revoked, so too, can
an airworthiness certificate.

Again, we have you plagiarizing on the yapping chihuahua bit. Have you
nothing original to contribute?

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 07:11 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

Hate to burst your bubble but "priests" are not exactly the most
believable
people these days.

Don't tell me. You voted for Foley. :)

Coming from Campbell or one of his groupies, that's worse than the pot
calling the kettle "black." That's like the sex pot calling the kettle
kinky! LOL!!!

DABEAR

December 18th 06, 07:21 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> No ****, dip****. That's why I toldya it's a Wannabe Jacket, putz. Can't
> even read now, eh? :)

Can't stop plagiarizing I see...for wasn't it I that questioned your
reading ability?

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 18th 06, 07:36 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>> One thing's for sure, you must not have children. And if you do, I hope
>> you
>> don't treatment like your hero did. :)
>
> You want to give us another lecture on English Grammer? Also, isn't
> Puertoricans as you have it spelled, two words: Puerto Ricans.

You can't even come up with an original web site and you think you're going
teach me grammar. LOL!

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 18th 06, 07:39 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>
>> Is that why you're running around in a wannabe flight suit?
>
> Prove that it's a flight suit or a wannabe one, Juan.

Easy. You're a wannabe. Therefore, anything you wear is wannabe clothing. :)

>> Sorry to burst your bubble, but I get paid $1000 a day just to talk +
>> expenses. I teach, in Puerto Rico, the mainland and overseas, on IT
>> management subjects.'
>
> Well, that's pretty darned good, Juan. So, what'cha doing here?
> ROTFLMAOx10!!!

Yanking your chain and watching you dance. Cheap entertainment. :)

>>BZZZT! Wrong answer again, nimrod. You
>> see, there is a person in my family who, unlike you, is a true
>> photojournalist. Here, nimrod, read the description of this photo, this
>> is
>> what true photojournalists do. This one happens to be my brother.
>>
>> http://imagery.gettyimages.com/YIF2006/source/gallery.aspx?section=nws&gallery=18&slide=4&stslide=1
>
> I see no photo credit indicating your brother took the shot.

That's because you need to put your official Rice Krispies Nimrod Glasses
on, putz. Bottom right. :)

> I see Jose Jimenez ~ that tells me Bill Dana took the shot.

Bill Dana's? LOL! He's dead, kinda like your reputation. :)

<mercy snip on ape**** diahrrea>

This is just too predictable. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 18th 06, 07:39 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>
>
>> I'll give that... umm... 0.3 on a scale of one to 10. :)

<Mercy snip> Ctrl-F on "intelligence" <not found>

Yup, as I suspected. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 18th 06, 07:40 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>
>> Especially when all you yapping mutts say he should have registered the
>> record with FAI, when in fact FAI did not begin accepting records in the
>> microlight category until 1984.
>
> No Juan, we're merely saying that if he truly wanted to set a record,
> why not approach the NAA or the FAI, create the new category, then set
> the record?

Backpedaling on the story? So soon? Now he was supposed to create the
category too???? HAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

<more diahrrea snips>

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 18th 06, 07:42 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> "DABEAR" > wrote in message
>> ups.com...
>> > Yawn wrote:
>> >
>> >>Nice try, but not even close. Jim doesn't read usenet. And all I get a
>> >>kick
>> >>out of is yanking the chains and watching the rah monkeys jump up and
>> >>down.
>> >>:)
>> >
>> > It's been documented that Campbell has posted here before.
>>
>> You think, retard? LOL!
>
> Actually, I know. Here's an archived link:
>
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.aviation.homebuilt/msg/b265fb5ad6d56bcb

Not ****, sherlock. You actually keep these? My goodness, I didn't know you
were so infatuated with Jim that you keep track of ancient history posts.
LOL!

<mercy snip>

<Dip**** even missed the sarcasm.... oh, well, par for the nimrod course.>

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 18th 06, 07:42 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>> This is just too easy. Like taking candy from a yapping chihuahua.
>> <chuckle>
>>
>> We're still waiting for your "aviation experience," putz!

<mercy snip>

Markyboi, we're STILL waiting for your "aviation experience."

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 18th 06, 07:43 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>
>> No ****, dip****. That's why I toldya it's a Wannabe Jacket, putz. Can't
>> even read now, eh? :)
>
> Can't stop plagiarizing I see...for wasn't it I that questioned your
> reading ability?

You're so confused you can't even remember your own posts. Pathetic! :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 18th 06, 07:45 PM

"ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
...
> In article >, Al G says...
> Gee
> I go Deer Hunting for a few days and all this fun happens. I shot a World
> Record
> Doe last week at a hunting show.

That's what Cheney said too.

So, ChuckieSteak, when are you going to follow up on your BS story of
tracking down all the stories? :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 18th 06, 07:49 PM

The RAH Yapping Mascot > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
>> You're the expert on claiming aviation experience, why don't you ask him?
>> :)
>
> Plan to! His Attorneys as well. It's called a subpoena.

Unhuh. Sure you will. Hold your breath until you do it. :)

>> Can you back up any aviation experience of yours with any documentation,
>> putz? :)
>
> Sure can...they can get that in discovery as well.

Sure they will. One empty, solitary piece of paper. Here you are, in front
of all the people you think you're going to impress, and you can't produce
one single line of aviation experience, short of standing next to airplanes
and trying your best to pretend you're the Barney Fife of the flight ramp.
All you do is squirm like a wannabe worm and orally excrete all sorts of
excuses not do respond. You're such a dip****. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

December 18th 06, 07:51 PM

The RAH Gaggle Mascot > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>
>> Okdok, you're now official the expert on predictable assholes. Go forth
>> and
>> investigate, Markyboi. :)
>
> Well, we could poll the newsgroup here and see if I'm right or wrong about
> you and Jim?

Try field experimentation first. There's 15 of them in the gaggle, and you
love assholes so much, go forth and investigate, boi. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Al G[_1_]

December 18th 06, 07:58 PM

"ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
...
> In article >, Al G says...
>>
>>
>>"John Ousterhout" > wrote in
>>message
>>news:fbhhh.274084$FQ1.4251@attbi_s71...
>>> Al G wrote:
>>>> I got an email from Zoom yesterday. Beyond the usual stuff:
>>>> threats,
>>>> get a lawyer, besmirched his rep, I made false claims, etc.
>>>
>>> Congratulations, you've won a T-Shirt.
>>> http://ousterhout.net/gallery/I've_been_zoomed.jpg
>>>
>>> Wear it proudly.
>>>
>>> John Ousterhout
>>> - rah-14
>>
>>No **** John? Damn, I'm, well, Honored. I'd like to thank my parents, and
>>teachers, and all the little people that made my rise to ultimate success
>>a
>>reality.
>>
>>By the way, I got another nasty gram. What is "Tortuous Interference"
>>anyway? I wish Tony was here...
>
> Gee
> I go Deer Hunting for a few days and all this fun happens. I shot a World
> Record
> Doe last week at a hunting show.I took pictures but they didn't come
> out.And I
> cut it up and ate it before I knew the pictures were bad...Darn,...
> But'it's the
> truth ...Honest!!
> A World Record by the Greatest Hunting Aviator ever .Over 17,000 deer
> since I
> was 13 HONEST!! The last one did a loop and a roll before spinning down
> the hill
> ANOTHER WORLD RECORD for shot Deer in an aerobatic performance. HONEST!!
> Ask my
> friend Pancho he'll swear to it !!He hold's the record for the slowest
> flying
> small jet.Its so sloow that the wheels have only moved 5" in the last 10
> years
> during it's take off roll.WOW WHAT A RECORD!!
>
> Al G I see you contacted zoom at jauns request and got his answer to your
> question.So congrats to you on your "I've been zoomed" award your now a
> member
> of the "zoomed and survived fraternity" "the many,the proud the zoomed".
> The
> list is a who's who of aviation be proud, for now you know the thrill of
> being
> told the stirring phrases "Tortuous Interference,guilty of slander and
> govern
> yourself accordingly" among others. Wear it proudly.
>
> Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret
>

Chuck, you guys have touched my heart..., sniff..., bubble...choke...

Someone else used the phrase RAH 15, and I almost cried.

Thanks, I hope I live up to the standard you folks have set. By the way,
this is an "Internationally Recognized" group isn't it? I'd hate to have
some
"unofficial" litigants running around out there.

While it is not my MO to go stomping around in mine fields, I did
contact
Col. Rick Searfoss, Chief Pilot and Spokesperson, with a synopsis of the
situation.

Al G