Paul Tomblin

[Juan Jimenez]

Paul, If you have a beef with me and you feel strongly enough about it to
post on Wikipedia, you should, at the very least, make sure you have a
something approaching a clue when it comes to the subject on which you are
commenting. Not following this simple guideline can make you look very
foolish in front of a very big audience.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[ChuckSlusarczyk]

In article >, Juan Jimenez says...
>
>Paul, If you have a beef with me and you feel strongly enough about it to
>post on Wikipedia, you should, at the very least, make sure you have a
>something approaching a clue when it comes to the subject on which you are
>commenting. Not following this simple guideline can make you look very
>foolish in front of a very big audience.

Paul that statement is coming from a guy who doesn't follow his own advice and
has the gall to preach to you. Sheesh!!! He's worrying that "you'll" look
foolish while he been making a fool of himself on the net for a long time.

Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret

"cfedibility it was always about credibility" ..... chuck s

[Paul Tomblin]

In a previous article, "Juan Jimenez" > said:
>Paul, If you have a beef with me and you feel strongly enough about it to
>post on Wikipedia, you should, at the very least, make sure you have a
>something approaching a clue when it comes to the subject on which you are
>commenting. Not following this simple guideline can make you look very
>foolish in front of a very big audience.

So are you saying that I was wrong when I said it hasn't flown yet?
Because either that would be a lie, or your for-sale page where you say it
has 0 flight hours is a lie.

Or are you saying that lots of people say it will never fly? Because I
can point to about a dozen on this newsgroup.

I stand by what I said. It's all true.

If it's so damn safe, fly it and show us what it and you are made of.

--
Paul Tomblin > http://blog.xcski.com/
You can drag any rat out of the sewer and teach it to get some work done in
Perl, but you cannot teach it serious programming.
-- Erik Naggum

[ChuckSlusarczyk]

In article >, Paul Tomblin says...
>
>In a previous article, "Juan Jimenez" > said:
>>Paul, If you have a beef with me and you feel strongly enough about it to
>>post on Wikipedia, you should, at the very least, make sure you have a
>>something approaching a clue when it comes to the subject on which you are
>>commenting. Not following this simple guideline can make you look very
>>foolish in front of a very big audience.
>
>So are you saying that I was wrong when I said it hasn't flown yet?
>Because either that would be a lie, or your for-sale page where you say it
>has 0 flight hours is a lie.
>
>Or are you saying that lots of people say it will never fly? Because I
>can point to about a dozen on this newsgroup.
>
>I stand by what I said. It's all true.
>
>If it's so damn safe, fly it and show us what it and you are made of.

Paul your being too logical in your approach to jaun he'll blow it off and make
another tangential accusation.

Chuck S

[BobR]

Besides Zoom, I can't think of anybody who has made more stupid and
unfounded comments on subjects they don't have a clue about than Jaun.
He has been making himself look like the fools fool before the RAH
newsgroup for a long time but that is far from his only forum for
showing his ignorance. View his profile history on the Google Groups
to see just how far he will go to do just what he warned Paul about.
Then again, who to better give advice on that subject than one who
never misses a chance to do just that. Finally, maybe we have found
something that Jaun is an expert at.


ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
> In article >, Juan Jimenez says...
> >
> >Paul, If you have a beef with me and you feel strongly enough about it to
> >post on Wikipedia, you should, at the very least, make sure you have a
> >something approaching a clue when it comes to the subject on which you are
> >commenting. Not following this simple guideline can make you look very
> >foolish in front of a very big audience.
>
> Paul that statement is coming from a guy who doesn't follow his own advice and
> has the gall to preach to you. Sheesh!!! He's worrying that "you'll" look
> foolish while he been making a fool of himself on the net for a long time.
>
> Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret
>
> "cfedibility it was always about credibility" ..... chuck s

[DABEAR]

Paul Tomblin wrote:

> If it's so damn safe, fly it and show us what it and you are made of.

Outside...Inside...Outside In...Inside
Out...Assembled...Disassembled...machst nichts.

Or, he might surprise us all...

I can see him in black fedora, black cape and green facepaint, flying
high above Oshkosh, the Emerald City of Aviation, skywriting with black
smoke pouring from the tail:

"Surrender RAH-14!"

Then, in an ironic act mimmicking what we all currently think about the
chances of his actually flying the "Butterball Bullet," Flying Monkeys
will come out of his butt, making the cockpit even more cramped and
worse...one will be trying to take over the controls from the Yawnster
Monster.

All will have the face of Juan, except the one desiring the controls,
and that one will look like Captain Zoom...who will have no Gods before
him.

Just Butt Monkeys like Juan.

[Dan[_2_]]

DABEAR wrote:
> Paul Tomblin wrote:
>
>> If it's so damn safe, fly it and show us what it and you are made of.
>
> Outside...Inside...Outside In...Inside
> Out...Assembled...Disassembled...machst nichts.
>
> Or, he might surprise us all...
>
> I can see him in black fedora, black cape and green facepaint, flying
> high above Oshkosh, the Emerald City of Aviation, skywriting with black
> smoke pouring from the tail:
>
> "Surrender RAH-14!"
>
> Then, in an ironic act mimmicking what we all currently think about the
> chances of his actually flying the "Butterball Bullet," Flying Monkeys
> will come out of his butt, making the cockpit even more cramped and
> worse...one will be trying to take over the controls from the Yawnster
> Monster.
>
> All will have the face of Juan, except the one desiring the controls,
> and that one will look like Captain Zoom...who will have no Gods before
> him.
>
> Just Butt Monkeys like Juan.
>

Place your bets, will the yawn dart ever fly?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[Dan[_2_]]

BobR wrote:
> Besides Zoom, I can't think of anybody who has made more stupid and
> unfounded comments on subjects they don't have a clue about than Jaun.
> He has been making himself look like the fools fool before the RAH
> newsgroup for a long time but that is far from his only forum for
> showing his ignorance. View his profile history on the Google Groups
> to see just how far he will go to do just what he warned Paul about.
> Then again, who to better give advice on that subject than one who
> never misses a chance to do just that. Finally, maybe we have found
> something that Jaun is an expert at.
>

You didn't know yawn was a goalie on his school javelin team?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[DABEAR]

Dan wrote:

> You didn't know yawn was a goalie on his school javelin team?
>
> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Too bad he wasn't a "receiver!"

[Paul Tomblin]

In a previous article, Dan > said:
>Place your bets, will the yawn dart ever fly?

And will it ever sell?


--
Paul Tomblin > http://blog.xcski.com/
We don't need a fountain of youth. We need a fountain of smart.
-- Bill Mattocks's .sig

[John Ousterhout]

Dan wrote:

> Place your bets, will the yawn dart ever fly?
>
> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

The odds are against it; Twenty to Juan.

- John Ousterhout -

[Juan Jimenez[_1_]]

"Paul Tomblin" > wrote in message
...
> In a previous article, "Juan Jimenez" > said:
>>Paul, If you have a beef with me and you feel strongly enough about it to
>>post on Wikipedia, you should, at the very least, make sure you have a
>>something approaching a clue when it comes to the subject on which you are
>>commenting. Not following this simple guideline can make you look very
>>foolish in front of a very big audience.
>
> So are you saying that I was wrong when I said it hasn't flown yet?

I assume you can read as well as write, right? Go look at my response to
your wikipedia comment. Speaks for itself.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[Paul Tomblin]

In a previous article, "Juan Jimenez" > said:
>"Paul Tomblin" > wrote in message
...
>> So are you saying that I was wrong when I said it hasn't flown yet?
>
>I assume you can read as well as write, right? Go look at my response to
>your wikipedia comment. Speaks for itself.

I did. You said I should "limit your comments to subject in which you
have at least an inkling of knowledge". But the fact remains that every
single thing I said in my post was 100% factual.

So yeah, it speaks for itself. It's a prime example of how you attack the
messenger when you can't find fault in the message.

--
Paul Tomblin > http://blog.xcski.com/
"Whoah, whoah! A fat sarcastic Star Trek fan? You must be a devil with the
ladies!" - Simpsons

[Juan Jimenez[_1_]]

"Paul Tomblin" > wrote in message
...
> In a previous article, "Juan Jimenez" > said:
>>"Paul Tomblin" > wrote in message
...
>>> So are you saying that I was wrong when I said it hasn't flown yet?
>>
>>I assume you can read as well as write, right? Go look at my response to
>>your wikipedia comment. Speaks for itself.
>
> I did. You said I should "limit your comments to subject in which you
> have at least an inkling of knowledge".

Exactly.

> But the fact remains that every single thing I said in my post was 100%
> factual.

About as factual as the rumblings of dip**** couch potato armchair
quarterbacks. You don't know squat about BD-5's, squat about BD-5J's and
certainly squat about my aircraft, seeing as you have never even bothered to
asked me. What you posted are not facts, they are opinions, which like
assholes, usually stink. You want to be shown up as a fool on wikipedia, go
right ahead! You go, boi. Just remember that audience is orders of magnitude
larger than this one.

> So yeah, it speaks for itself. It's a prime example of how you attack the
> messenger when you can't find fault in the message.

Bzzzt! Wrong answer. Bring more quarters the next time.

Next!



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[BobR]

Hell, he was apparently even a failure at that too.

Dan wrote:
> BobR wrote:
> > Besides Zoom, I can't think of anybody who has made more stupid and
> > unfounded comments on subjects they don't have a clue about than Jaun.
> > He has been making himself look like the fools fool before the RAH
> > newsgroup for a long time but that is far from his only forum for
> > showing his ignorance. View his profile history on the Google Groups
> > to see just how far he will go to do just what he warned Paul about.
> > Then again, who to better give advice on that subject than one who
> > never misses a chance to do just that. Finally, maybe we have found
> > something that Jaun is an expert at.
> >
>
> You didn't know yawn was a goalie on his school javelin team?
>
> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[Mark Hickey]

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote:

>"Paul Tomblin" > wrote
>> In a previous article, "Juan Jimenez" > said:
>>>"Paul Tomblin" > wrote

>> I did. You said I should "limit your comments to subject in which you
>> have at least an inkling of knowledge".
>
>Exactly.
>
>> But the fact remains that every single thing I said in my post was 100%
>> factual.
>
>About as factual as the rumblings of dip**** couch potato armchair
>quarterbacks. You don't know squat about BD-5's, squat about BD-5J's and
>certainly squat about my aircraft, seeing as you have never even bothered to
>asked me. What you posted are not facts, they are opinions, which like
>assholes, usually stink. You want to be shown up as a fool on wikipedia, go
>right ahead! You go, boi. Just remember that audience is orders of magnitude
>larger than this one.
>
>> So yeah, it speaks for itself. It's a prime example of how you attack the
>> messenger when you can't find fault in the message.
>
>Bzzzt! Wrong answer. Bring more quarters the next time.

Funny how Juan actually goes out of his way to prove your premise.

He counters facts with nothing more than blathering and insults. On
the (very) rare occasion when he can actually refute another post
(such as details on his airworthiness certificate), he lists plenty of
information.

So it's really trivial to determine when a r.a.h. post about Zoom
and/or Juan is irrefutable. If the reply contains nothing but
insults, obscenity and flippant comments, the original post can be
admitted as certified gospel.

In essence, Juan is a truth detector with the bulbs wired backward.

And the sad thing is, he honestly believes that he's defending himself
and his reputation with nonsense like he types above. Or maybe it's
just ironic, I dunno... hard to apply the term "sad" to someone who's
doing it to himself on purpose.

Mark "facts is facts" Hickey

[Gig 601XL Builder]

"Paul Tomblin" > wrote in message
...
> In a previous article, Dan > said:
>>Place your bets, will the yawn dart ever fly?
>
> And will it ever sell?
>

Maybe he can work a deal with Moller and do a two for one deal on E-Bay.

[Juan Jimenez[_1_]]

"BobR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
> Hell, he was apparently even a failure at that too.

Only failure around here is you, remember? Did they strike that one off your
credit record yet? And are you still whining about the money you gave Jim
Bede?

Get a life, Bob. It will help ease the pain of knowing you'll never achieve
anything close to what I have done so far. :)



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[Juan Jimenez[_1_]]

"Mark Hickey" > wrote in message
...
>
> Funny how Juan actually goes out of his way to prove your premise.
>
> He counters facts with nothing more than blathering and insults.

As opposed to what, your inconsequential babbling and your belief that
anyone on the other side of the keyboard gives a damn what you type? LOL!

Everything I have said is documented. Don't like that? That's a personal
problem, speak to your mommy. :)

Next! :)



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[Dan[_2_]]

John Ousterhout wrote:
> Dan wrote:
>
>> Place your bets, will the yawn dart ever fly?
>>
>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>
> The odds are against it; Twenty to Juan.
>
> - John Ousterhout -
>
>
>
Juana bet?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[DABEAR]

Juan Jimenez wrote:


> Get a life, Bob. It will help ease the pain of knowing you'll never achieve
> anything close to what I have done so far. :)


All Hanoi Juan has accomplished in life is to betray a lot of brave
guys who served while his meal ticket didn't. And if his
accomplishments are so great, why does he have to come here and "try"
to brag about them and put others down?

We're still waiting on your boss to post his logbooks and DD 214. And
we're waiting on Hanoi Juan to make a name for himself in his
homeland...

The Sewers of North Vietnam...

[DABEAR]

Juan Jimenez wrote:


> Get a life, Bob. It will help ease the pain of knowing you'll never achieve
> anything close to what I have done so far. :)


All Hanoi Juan has accomplished in life is to betray a lot of brave
guys who served while his meal ticket didn't. And if his
accomplishments are so great, why does he have to come here and "try"
to brag about them and put others down?

We're still waiting on your boss to post his logbooks and DD 214. And
we're waiting on Hanoi Juan to make a name for himself in his
homeland...

The Sewers of North Vietnam...

[BobR]

You have got to love Jaun and his ego. Why he thinks anyone would want
to sink to his level in life as a low life asshole is beyond me. I
don't know if he was in the military or not but I do know what he has
become and that accomplishment is something that I can live a long and
happy life without.


DABEAR wrote:
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>
> > Get a life, Bob. It will help ease the pain of knowing you'll never achieve
> > anything close to what I have done so far. :)
>
>
> All Hanoi Juan has accomplished in life is to betray a lot of brave
> guys who served while his meal ticket didn't. And if his
> accomplishments are so great, why does he have to come here and "try"
> to brag about them and put others down?
>
> We're still waiting on your boss to post his logbooks and DD 214. And
> we're waiting on Hanoi Juan to make a name for himself in his
> homeland...
>
> The Sewers of North Vietnam...

[DABEAR]

BobR wrote:

> You have got to love Jaun and his ego. Why he thinks anyone would want
> to sink to his level in life as a low life asshole is beyond me. I
> don't know if he was in the military or not but I do know what he has
> become and that accomplishment is something that I can live a long and
> happy life without.


Yeah, this clown actually served in the Marines and now spends his time
sucking up to a guy who ~ at a minimum ~ has on two occasions claimed
to have been 1) a wounded Vietnam veteran and 2) a U.S. Army veteran of
Vietnam, who was at My Lai and witnessed the massacre there, then
claimed he was being followed by the CIA because of "what he knew!".

And THIS is the highest accomplishment Hanoi Juan has to claim in
life..."servicing" Captain Zoom and running a harassment campain on
behalf of the most insane liar in the Universe; that harassment
campaign being conducted on those who paid Hanoi Juan's wages ~ the
same wages that Yumpin' Yimenez used to support his family with ~ a
harassment campaign that includes attacking other veterans that dissent
with the liar Campbell, all right here on USENET.

That's Hanoi Juan's idea of "having a life!" That and not flying his
POS "Butterball Bomb" in the year since it's been "Airworthy."
Something that really tells you just how "Airworthy" it isn't! That
and the engine shutting down after ten hours and needing to be taken
apart for repair...

Proof postive that when your engine starts making metal and the metal
turns out to be chicken wire, time to fire the "Crew Cheap!"

I hope this clown doesn't work for the airlines...

In fact, seeing as how he was at Tustin, I wonder how many CH-46s and
Marines are currently sitting on the bottom of the ocean thanks to
Juan.

If it's more than four, he's Al Qaeda's first "Ace!"

[Mark Hickey]

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote:

>
>"Mark Hickey" > wrote in message
...
>>
>> Funny how Juan actually goes out of his way to prove your premise.
>>
>> He counters facts with nothing more than blathering and insults.
>
>As opposed to what, your inconsequential babbling and your belief that
>anyone on the other side of the keyboard gives a damn what you type? LOL!
>
>Everything I have said is documented. Don't like that? That's a personal
>problem, speak to your mommy. :)
>
>Next! :)

Juan, they get it - I appreciate you jumping in to prove my point, but
it's really quite unnecessary by now.

Mark "guess you can't help it" Hickey

[BobR]

Hell man, you are still giving him way too much credit. He is not even
a success at being a loser.


DABEAR wrote:
> BobR wrote:
>
> > You have got to love Jaun and his ego. Why he thinks anyone would want
> > to sink to his level in life as a low life asshole is beyond me. I
> > don't know if he was in the military or not but I do know what he has
> > become and that accomplishment is something that I can live a long and
> > happy life without.
>
>
> Yeah, this clown actually served in the Marines and now spends his time
> sucking up to a guy who ~ at a minimum ~ has on two occasions claimed
> to have been 1) a wounded Vietnam veteran and 2) a U.S. Army veteran of
> Vietnam, who was at My Lai and witnessed the massacre there, then
> claimed he was being followed by the CIA because of "what he knew!".
>
> And THIS is the highest accomplishment Hanoi Juan has to claim in
> life..."servicing" Captain Zoom and running a harassment campain on
> behalf of the most insane liar in the Universe; that harassment
> campaign being conducted on those who paid Hanoi Juan's wages ~ the
> same wages that Yumpin' Yimenez used to support his family with ~ a
> harassment campaign that includes attacking other veterans that dissent
> with the liar Campbell, all right here on USENET.
>
> That's Hanoi Juan's idea of "having a life!" That and not flying his
> POS "Butterball Bomb" in the year since it's been "Airworthy."
> Something that really tells you just how "Airworthy" it isn't! That
> and the engine shutting down after ten hours and needing to be taken
> apart for repair...
>
> Proof postive that when your engine starts making metal and the metal
> turns out to be chicken wire, time to fire the "Crew Cheap!"
>
> I hope this clown doesn't work for the airlines...
>
> In fact, seeing as how he was at Tustin, I wonder how many CH-46s and
> Marines are currently sitting on the bottom of the ocean thanks to
> Juan.
>
> If it's more than four, he's Al Qaeda's first "Ace!"

[Juan Jimenez[_1_]]

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>
>> Get a life, Bob. It will help ease the pain of knowing you'll never
>> achieve
>> anything close to what I have done so far. :)
>

<mercy snip>

Speak when spoken to, coward. Back to your sandbox. Shoo. :)




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[DABEAR]

BobR wrote:
> Hell man, you are still giving him way too much credit. He is not even
> a success at being a loser.


LOL!!!

I can't, man! It would be an insult to losers!

Even the Devil will have to look six stories down to punish Juan when
the time comes...because Hell is going to be too good for him! HA!

[DABEAR]

John Ousterhout wrote:
> Dan wrote:
>
> > Place your bets, will the yawn dart ever fly?
> >
> > Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>
> The odds are against it; Twenty to Juan.
>
> - John Ousterhout -

Now wait just a minute here!

Does "straight down" count!? 'Cause if it does, I'll throw some money
into the smoking hole, er..."kitty!"