Sebring and Hitlaw [Archive]

Pages : [1] 2

Juan Jimenez

January 12th 07, 03:14 AM

Yo Hitlaw, have you been spotted at the Sebring show? <chuckle>

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[email protected]

January 12th 07, 03:59 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> Yo Hitlaw, have you been spotted at the Sebring show? <chuckle>
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Yes I was!!! And I also was within arms length from your puppet
master, he didn't even say hello. He did his normal run over and join
into a conversation with some people so he would have a witness if I
decided to terrorize him and then he left the premises. I looked around
behind him expecting to find you liplocked to his ass but fortunately
for you I had no such luck.

Besides what business is it of yours where I show up. For the record
I'll likely be there all four days then it is off to some other far off
land.

Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring,

[email protected]

January 12th 07, 07:07 AM

wrote:
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
> > Yo Hitlaw, have you been spotted at the Sebring show? <chuckle>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>
> Yes I was!!! And I also was within arms length from your puppet
> master, he didn't even say hello. He did his normal run over and join
> into a conversation with some people so he would have a witness if I
> decided to terrorize him and then he left the premises. I looked around
> behind him expecting to find you liplocked to his ass but fortunately
> for you I had no such luck.
>
> Besides what business is it of yours where I show up. For the record
> I'll likely be there all four days then it is off to some other far off
> land.
>
> Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring,

Geez, it sure is nice to be treated like a celebrity. Brad and
Angelina spotted in Hollywood,Madonna seen in London and Frank spotted
at the LSA Expo in Florida.

zzzzoom spots me turns pale, hides,then flees. The real gut buster
was the next thing he does is to notify the other half of the bull****
brotherhood.

Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring

[email protected]

January 12th 07, 07:09 AM

[email protected]

January 12th 07, 07:09 AM

[email protected]

January 12th 07, 07:18 AM

wrote:

Sorry about the multiple post pushed the send key once and got three
messages.

Frank;

Anthony W

January 12th 07, 07:26 AM

wrote:
> wrote:
>
>
> Sorry about the multiple post pushed the send key once and got three
> messages.
>
> Frank;

No worries, it's happens to everybody that posts on newsgroups sooner or
later.

Tony

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 12th 07, 08:36 PM

> wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> Yo Hitlaw, have you been spotted at the Sebring show? <chuckle>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>
> Yes I was!!! And I also was within arms length from your puppet
> master, he didn't even say hello.

You made the mistake of doing that while he was accompanied. It seems the
real story is quite different, which does not surprise me one bit. He almost
didn't recognize you, apparently you're fatter and uglier than when he last
saw you ten years ago. Something about a restraining order a woman filed
against you? :)

So, are you still stalking other people's girlfriends or just visiting your
mom? :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 12th 07, 08:42 PM

> wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> wrote:
>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> > Yo Hitlaw, have you been spotted at the Sebring show? <chuckle>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>
>> Yes I was!!! And I also was within arms length from your puppet
>> master, he didn't even say hello. He did his normal run over and join
>> into a conversation with some people so he would have a witness if I
>> decided to terrorize him and then he left the premises. I looked around
>> behind him expecting to find you liplocked to his ass but fortunately
>> for you I had no such luck.
>>
>> Besides what business is it of yours where I show up. For the record
>> I'll likely be there all four days then it is off to some other far off
>> land.
>>
>> Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring,
>
> Geez, it sure is nice to be treated like a celebrity. Brad and
> Angelina spotted in Hollywood,Madonna seen in London and Frank spotted
> at the LSA Expo in Florida.
>
> zzzzoom spots me turns pale, hides,then flees. The real gut buster
> was the next thing he does is to notify the other half of the bull****
> brotherhood.

I told him FrankieBoy said he wants to meet me in Singapore, that's why he
called me when he thought he had seen you. Why do you make funny faces at
people, Frankie? Haven't grown up yet? Oh, of course, I forgot, you're still
living with your mom, except when you need to make money and need to travel
to do so. You and Daniels appear to have a lot in common, with this thing
about living with
moms long after you should have been weaned. :)

So what's this about you stalking women and getting slapped with restraining
orders? Hmm... sounds like the typical behaviour of someone who claims to be
one thing on the Internet but is a total putz in real life. <chuckle> Is
that the only way you can meet women?

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Morgans[_2_]

January 12th 07, 09:51 PM

"Anthony W" > wrote

> No worries, it's happens to everybody that posts on newsgroups sooner or
> later.

No, it has never happened to me!
--
Jim in NC

Morgans[_2_]

January 12th 07, 09:52 PM

"Anthony W" > wrote

> No worries, it's happens to everybody that posts on newsgroups sooner or
> later.

No, it has never happened to me!
--
Jim in NC

<ggg>

[email protected]

January 12th 07, 10:36 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> > wrote in message
> oups.com...
> >
> > wrote:
> >> Juan Jimenez wrote:
> >> > Yo Hitlaw, have you been spotted at the Sebring show? <chuckle>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
> >>
> >> Yes I was!!! And I also was within arms length from your puppet
> >> master, he didn't even say hello. He did his normal run over and join
> >> into a conversation with some people so he would have a witness if I
> >> decided to terrorize him and then he left the premises. I looked around
> >> behind him expecting to find you liplocked to his ass but fortunately
> >> for you I had no such luck.
> >>
> >> Besides what business is it of yours where I show up. For the record
> >> I'll likely be there all four days then it is off to some other far off
> >> land.
> >>
> >> Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring,
> >
> > Geez, it sure is nice to be treated like a celebrity. Brad and
> > Angelina spotted in Hollywood,Madonna seen in London and Frank spotted
> > at the LSA Expo in Florida.
> >
> > zzzzoom spots me turns pale, hides,then flees. The real gut buster
> > was the next thing he does is to notify the other half of the bull****
> > brotherhood.
>
> I told him FrankieBoy said he wants to meet me in Singapore, that's why he
> called me when he thought he had seen you. Why do you make funny faces at
> people, Frankie? Haven't grown up yet? Oh, of course, I forgot, you're still
> living with your mom, except when you need to make money and need to travel
> to do so. You and Daniels appear to have a lot in common, with this thing
> about living with
> moms long after you should have been weaned. :)
>
> So what's this about you stalking women and getting slapped with restraining
> orders? Hmm... sounds like the typical behaviour of someone who claims to be
> one thing on the Internet but is a total putz in real life. <chuckle> Is
> that the only way you can meet women?
>
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

I can understand that your mother wouldn't want you to stay with her
while you were on vacation. Mine kind of likes to see me once in a
while. This is the first time I spent in Sebring in over 12 years so
big deal.

Please show proof to me that I had a restraining order enforced on
me, again your normal line of bull****. You make a statement with
absolutely no proof and you will never have any because it doesn't
exist. And if you are talking about zzzzooms lawsuit remember one thing
peckerbreath I WON that one.

You and zzzoom are ones to talk about fat, what does he go now about
300 on the hoof from the photos you are not that far behind.

Please explain the comment about meeting women. I can't figure out
what you are talking about and I am pretty sure you don't know either.

Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 13th 07, 03:01 AM

> wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> I can understand that your mother wouldn't want you to stay with her
> while you were on vacation.

Wow, ten year vacation. That's some record! :)

> Please show proof to me that I had a restraining order enforced on
> me, again your normal line of bull****.

Ask Laurel, she's the one who asked for it, no? :)

> You and zzzoom are ones to talk about fat, what does he go now about
> 300 on the hoof from the photos you are not that far behind.

LOL! Last time I weighed myself was last week. 225, bubba. Do you even own a
scale?

> Please explain the comment about meeting women. I can't figure out
> what you are talking about....

That's what I thought, thanks for the confirmation. :)

> ...and I am pretty sure you don't know either.

Sure, Frank, keep guessing. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[email protected]

January 13th 07, 07:05 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> > wrote in message
> ups.com...
> >
> > I can understand that your mother wouldn't want you to stay with her
> > while you were on vacation.
>
> Wow, ten year vacation. That's some record! :)
>
> > Please show proof to me that I had a restraining order enforced on
> > me, again your normal line of bull****.
>
> Ask Laurel, she's the one who asked for it, no? :)
>
> > You and zzzoom are ones to talk about fat, what does he go now about
> > 300 on the hoof from the photos you are not that far behind.
>
> LOL! Last time I weighed myself was last week. 225, bubba. Do you even own a
> scale?
>
> > Please explain the comment about meeting women. I can't figure out
> > what you are talking about....
>
> That's what I thought, thanks for the confirmation. :)
>
> > ...and I am pretty sure you don't know either.
>
> Sure, Frank, keep guessing. :)
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Put up or shut up . Put some proof on the board showing that she or
anyone else has ever had a restraining order against me. Can't be done
cause it has never happened.I think your pal is the expert on
restraining orders,doesn't Sun N Fun have one against him. (Zoom Free
Zone)

Are you trying to say that I have been living here in Sebring for the
last ten years? Again put up or shut up.I sure as hell got alot of
frequent flyer miles on Singapore Airlines for being being here.

225 lbs bull****, your shadow weighs that much.

One other thing you got ass backwards zzzzoom is the lucky one that
he had an escort.

Get back to me when you have some hard facts to back up what you put
into this post. If not crawl back under your rock or more likely crawl
back up zzzooms ass.

Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring

[email protected]

January 13th 07, 07:06 AM

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 13th 07, 06:36 PM

> wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Put up or shut up . Put some proof on the board showing that she or
> anyone else has ever had a restraining order against me. Can't be done
> cause it has never happened.I think your pal is the expert on
> restraining orders,doesn't Sun N Fun have one against him. (Zoom Free
> Zone)

Like I said, ask Laurel. Interesting how much you're avoiding that word in
your replies, eh? :)

> 225 lbs bull****, your shadow weighs that much.

Oh, don't worry boy, you'll see proof of that soon enough. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 13th 07, 06:37 PM

Why are you so nervous that you keep posting things twice? :)

> wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> > wrote in message
>> ups.com...
>> >
>> > I can understand that your mother wouldn't want you to stay with her
>> > while you were on vacation.
>>
>> Wow, ten year vacation. That's some record! :)
>>
>> > Please show proof to me that I had a restraining order enforced on
>> > me, again your normal line of bull****.
>>
>> Ask Laurel, she's the one who asked for it, no? :)
>>
>> > You and zzzoom are ones to talk about fat, what does he go now about
>> > 300 on the hoof from the photos you are not that far behind.
>>
>> LOL! Last time I weighed myself was last week. 225, bubba. Do you even
>> own a
>> scale?
>>
>> > Please explain the comment about meeting women. I can't figure out
>> > what you are talking about....
>>
>> That's what I thought, thanks for the confirmation. :)
>>
>> > ...and I am pretty sure you don't know either.
>>
>> Sure, Frank, keep guessing. :)
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>
> Put up or shut up . Put some proof on the board showing that she or
> anyone else has ever had a restraining order against me. Can't be done
> cause it has never happened.I think your pal is the expert on
> restraining orders,doesn't Sun N Fun have one against him. (Zoom Free
> Zone)
>
> Are you trying to say that I have been living here in Sebring for the
> last ten years? Again put up or shut up.I sure as hell got alot of
> frequent flyer miles on Singapore Airlines for being being here.
>
> 225 lbs bull****, your shadow weighs that much.
>
> One other thing you got ass backwards zzzzoom is the lucky one that
> he had an escort.
>
> Get back to me when you have some hard facts to back up what you put
> into this post. If not crawl back under your rock or more likely crawl
> back up zzzooms ass.
>
> Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring
>

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

red12049[_1_]

January 13th 07, 08:25 PM

What I find interesting is that you make the accusation, and then point to
someone else to provide your proof for you, and that this has been your
pattern for years, here and on other newsgroups as well. Actions, Juan, not
words. Someone else here mentioned that YOU define who YOU are. He was
correct.

The following was copied from an ANN page that I believe was posted around
1999.

"So... Who Are We?
We are the Aero-News Network: An Online Daily Aviation Aerospace News
Resource. We have a strong commitment to safety, consumer activism,
Aero-education, and Aero-entertainment (let's face it, the main reason most
of us come to aviation is because it is a lot of fun and we dare not forget
that no matter how serious the subject matter may be). ANN will be, at
first, what we make it, but ultimately it will be what YOU make it. We
implore you all to demand the very best of us, to offer your suggestions,
questions, criticism, and News-Spy Tips... and to participate fully in every
aspect of ANN's growth and posture. We ask you to be highly critical of us,
and to take your time to point out what we're doing wrong or not doing at
all, and what you think we need to be addressing. So... that in the long
run, when people ask who those ANN guys are; that, in addition to folks like
Jim Campbell, Pete Combs, Juan Jimenez, Kevin O'Brien, John Ballantyne,
Aleta Vinas, Rose Dorcey and many other talented fly-writers and
photographers, that YOUR names, wishes and concerns will be a big part of it
as well."

I truly wish that those who go to the ANN site could read the above, and
then be given a quick tour here. Try telling those readers that your
personna here is not who you "really" are, and that you act this way just
for fun. Actions, Juan, not words.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Juan Jimenez" >
Newsgroups: rec.aviation.homebuilt
Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 1:36 PM
Subject: Re: Sebring and Hitlaw

>
> > wrote in message
> ups.com...
>>
>> Put up or shut up . Put some proof on the board showing that she or
>> anyone else has ever had a restraining order against me. Can't be done
>> cause it has never happened.I think your pal is the expert on
>> restraining orders,doesn't Sun N Fun have one against him. (Zoom Free
>> Zone)
>
> Like I said, ask Laurel. Interesting how much you're avoiding that word in
> your replies, eh? :)
>
>> 225 lbs bull****, your shadow weighs that much.
>
> Oh, don't worry boy, you'll see proof of that soon enough. :)
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>

> wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> > wrote in message
>> ups.com...
>> >
>> > I can understand that your mother wouldn't want you to stay with her
>> > while you were on vacation.
>>
>> Wow, ten year vacation. That's some record! :)
>>
>> > Please show proof to me that I had a restraining order enforced on
>> > me, again your normal line of bull****.
>>
>> Ask Laurel, she's the one who asked for it, no? :)
>>
>> > You and zzzoom are ones to talk about fat, what does he go now about
>> > 300 on the hoof from the photos you are not that far behind.
>>
>> LOL! Last time I weighed myself was last week. 225, bubba. Do you even
>> own a
>> scale?
>>
>> > Please explain the comment about meeting women. I can't figure out
>> > what you are talking about....
>>
>> That's what I thought, thanks for the confirmation. :)
>>
>> > ...and I am pretty sure you don't know either.
>>
>> Sure, Frank, keep guessing. :)
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>
> Put up or shut up . Put some proof on the board showing that she or
> anyone else has ever had a restraining order against me. Can't be done
> cause it has never happened.I think your pal is the expert on
> restraining orders,doesn't Sun N Fun have one against him. (Zoom Free
> Zone)
>
> Are you trying to say that I have been living here in Sebring for the
> last ten years? Again put up or shut up.I sure as hell got alot of
> frequent flyer miles on Singapore Airlines for being being here.
>
> 225 lbs bull****, your shadow weighs that much.
>
> One other thing you got ass backwards zzzzoom is the lucky one that
> he had an escort.
>
> Get back to me when you have some hard facts to back up what you put
> into this post. If not crawl back under your rock or more likely crawl
> back up zzzooms ass.
>
> Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring
>

[email protected]

January 13th 07, 09:16 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> Why are you so nervous that you keep posting things twice? :)
>
> > wrote in message
> ups.com...
> >
> > Juan Jimenez wrote:
> >> > wrote in message
> >> ups.com...
> >> >
> >> > I can understand that your mother wouldn't want you to stay with her
> >> > while you were on vacation.
> >>
> >> Wow, ten year vacation. That's some record! :)
> >>
> >> > Please show proof to me that I had a restraining order enforced on
> >> > me, again your normal line of bull****.
> >>
> >> Ask Laurel, she's the one who asked for it, no? :)
> >>
> >> > You and zzzoom are ones to talk about fat, what does he go now about
> >> > 300 on the hoof from the photos you are not that far behind.
> >>
> >> LOL! Last time I weighed myself was last week. 225, bubba. Do you even
> >> own a
> >> scale?
> >>
> >> > Please explain the comment about meeting women. I can't figure out
> >> > what you are talking about....
> >>
> >> That's what I thought, thanks for the confirmation. :)
> >>
> >> > ...and I am pretty sure you don't know either.
> >>
> >> Sure, Frank, keep guessing. :)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
> >
> > Put up or shut up . Put some proof on the board showing that she or
> > anyone else has ever had a restraining order against me. Can't be done
> > cause it has never happened.I think your pal is the expert on
> > restraining orders,doesn't Sun N Fun have one against him. (Zoom Free
> > Zone)
> >
> > Are you trying to say that I have been living here in Sebring for the
> > last ten years? Again put up or shut up.I sure as hell got alot of
> > frequent flyer miles on Singapore Airlines for being being here.
> >
> > 225 lbs bull****, your shadow weighs that much.
> >
> > One other thing you got ass backwards zzzzoom is the lucky one that
> > he had an escort.
> >
> > Get back to me when you have some hard facts to back up what you put
> > into this post. If not crawl back under your rock or more likely crawl
> > back up zzzooms ass.
> >
> > Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

For certain I am not nervous about you, just wait porky when you are
not hiding behind a keyboard we will see just how nervous you will be.

Regarding Laurel I recently talked to her. She is doing well and she
is a real airline captain, not a phoney wannabe like your butt buddy.

Again put some facts on the table lardo...

Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 13th 07, 09:46 PM

> wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> For certain I am not nervous about you, just wait porky when you are
> not hiding behind a keyboard we will see just how nervous you will be.`

You calling _me_ porky, you half-wit mastodon? LOL! That's funny! *8)

> Regarding Laurel I recently talked to her. She is doing well and she
> is a real airline captain, not a phoney wannabe like your butt buddy.
>
> Again put some facts on the table lardo...

Sure you did, buttface. Kinda like when you said you were just visiting in
Sebring and claim Jim was running from you again. You can't even get the
facts from your own life right. Hell, you claim you're an A&P and you don't
even show up anywhere on the FAA's database! :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 13th 07, 09:49 PM

"red12049" > wrote in message
...

<mercy snip>

Your chosen mama's dress in which you choose to hide speaks perfectly to the
content of your post. Gibberish indeed! LOL!

> The following was copied from an ANN page that I believe was posted around
> 1999.

Hey! Look, Sherlock! A clue! Proving something I've never denied! What a
concept, putz! :)

Take your medicine. Come back when you make some sense. LOL!

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[email protected]

January 14th 07, 01:48 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> "red12049" > wrote in message
> ...
>
> <mercy snip>
>
> Your chosen mama's dress in which you choose to hide speaks perfectly to the
> content of your post. Gibberish indeed! LOL!
>
> > The following was copied from an ANN page that I believe was posted around
> > 1999.
>
> Hey! Look, Sherlock! A clue! Proving something I've never denied! What a
> concept, putz! :)
>
> Take your medicine. Come back when you make some sense. LOL!
>
>
>

Ask your butt buddy to tell you the truth when he left Sebring on
Thursday,it was within minutes of seeing me.Went out there again today
but I didn't see him is in hiding?

I do have an A&P license for the record I also have a Sr Parachute
Riggers rating. Again this is unlike your phoney wannabe bull**** buddy
it is real. Didn't they say something in the NTSB court hearing about
zzzoomy signing off a reserve without one. What do you have, anything?

I have a better one if I can swing another trip to the States I will
be at Sun N Fun. I can get in and we know who can't hahahaha !!!!

Later porko,

Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

red12049[_1_]

January 14th 07, 01:15 PM

Juan,

As I said in my previous post.... YOU prove who YOU are....for the world to
see.

> Your chosen mama's dress in which you choose to hide speaks perfectly to
> the content of your post. Gibberish indeed! LOL!

If you wish to speak of gibberish, look no further than the sentence above.

> Hey! Look, Sherlock! A clue! Proving something I've never denied! What a
> concept, putz! :)

Juan, all I was "proving" is that your behavior here neither fits nor befits
the paragraph I quoted from ANN.

> Take your medicine. Come back when you make some sense. LOL!

I neither take nor need any medicine, other than the occaisional aspirin.
Just because my previous post may not make sense to you, does not mean it
does not make sense to others. You show us who you are... in every action
you take here. In fact Juan, why don't you put a link on your website
directing your visitors here, so they can see your "other" persona. Might
be enlightening.

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
...
>
> "red12049" > wrote in message
> ...
>
> <mercy snip>
>
> Your chosen mama's dress in which you choose to hide speaks perfectly to
> the content of your post. Gibberish indeed! LOL!

>
>> The following was copied from an ANN page that I believe was posted
>> around 1999.
>
> Hey! Look, Sherlock! A clue! Proving something I've never denied! What a
> concept, putz! :)
>
> Take your medicine. Come back when you make some sense. LOL!
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>

ChuckSlusarczyk

January 14th 07, 08:55 PM

In article . com>,
says...
>
>
wrote:
>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> > Yo Hitlaw, have you been spotted at the Sebring show? <chuckle>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>
>> Yes I was!!! And I also was within arms length from your puppet
>> master, he didn't even say hello. He did his normal run over and join
>> into a conversation with some people so he would have a witness if I
>> decided to terrorize him and then he left the premises. I looked around
>> behind him expecting to find you liplocked to his ass but fortunately
>> for you I had no such luck.
>>
>> Besides what business is it of yours where I show up. For the record
>> I'll likely be there all four days then it is off to some other far off
>> land.
>>
>> Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring,
>
> Geez, it sure is nice to be treated like a celebrity. Brad and
>Angelina spotted in Hollywood,Madonna seen in London and Frank spotted
>at the LSA Expo in Florida.
>
> zzzzoom spots me turns pale, hides,then flees. The real gut buster
>was the next thing he does is to notify the other half of the bull****
>brotherhood.
>
> Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring

Hey Frank
I remember just how fast he ran to call the cops when we ate some of his
chicken. I bet he ran like that all his life .Maybe you should have told zoom
that jaun said you didn't have the balls to meet zoom face to face. I guess we
all know who lacks the testicular fortitude round these parts,and it ain't you
LOL!!!

Chuck S

[email protected]

January 15th 07, 05:26 AM

ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
> In article . com>,
> says...
> >
> >
> wrote:
> >> Juan Jimenez wrote:
> >> > Yo Hitlaw, have you been spotted at the Sebring show? <chuckle>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
> >>
> >> Yes I was!!! And I also was within arms length from your puppet
> >> master, he didn't even say hello. He did his normal run over and join
> >> into a conversation with some people so he would have a witness if I
> >> decided to terrorize him and then he left the premises. I looked around
> >> behind him expecting to find you liplocked to his ass but fortunately
> >> for you I had no such luck.
> >>
> >> Besides what business is it of yours where I show up. For the record
> >> I'll likely be there all four days then it is off to some other far off
> >> land.
> >>
> >> Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring,
> >
> > Geez, it sure is nice to be treated like a celebrity. Brad and
> >Angelina spotted in Hollywood,Madonna seen in London and Frank spotted
> >at the LSA Expo in Florida.
> >
> > zzzzoom spots me turns pale, hides,then flees. The real gut buster
> >was the next thing he does is to notify the other half of the bull****
> >brotherhood.
> >
> > Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring
>
>
> Hey Frank
> I remember just how fast he ran to call the cops when we ate some of his
> chicken. I bet he ran like that all his life .Maybe you should have told zoom
> that jaun said you didn't have the balls to meet zoom face to face. I guess we
> all know who lacks the testicular fortitude round these parts,and it ain't you
> LOL!!!
>
> Chuck S

Hi Chuck;

It's pretty amazing when just the fact that the moozzz seeing me at a
public event is enough to throw him and his butt boy into a tizzie. Of
course with him not having the balls to say something directly to me it
can't be expected that he would have the balls to admit to how it
really went down. The only thing posted on Thursday by ANN's EIC or his
mouthpiece yawn regarding the first day of the LSA Expo was the fact
that I was spotted there. Now that shows where their priorities are,
yes sir we cover the important news concerning aviation.

As for the Puerto Rican hippo he can't even keep his stories
straight. A little over a year ago he was accusing me of working on the
Mandala 737 that crashed in Medan Indonesia. In this thread he inferred
that I wasn't an A&P. Also he made the statement that I have been here
in Sebring staying at my mothers for the past 10 years. Either I am an
A&P and was overseas working or I don't have a license and have been
here in Florida. That shows that he just spews this stuff to try to
stir up crap. We'll see how how he is when he isn't hiding behind a
keyboard probably a whimp and a blimp all rolled into one.

Frank M.Hitlaw, assistant chief chicken thief;
P.S. Say hello to El Pollo Loco for me...

ChuckSlusarczyk

January 15th 07, 01:43 PM

>
> As for the Puerto Rican hippo he can't even keep his stories
>straight. A little over a year ago he was accusing me of working on the
>Mandala 737 that crashed in Medan Indonesia. In this thread he inferred
>that I wasn't an A&P. Also he made the statement that I have been here
>in Sebring staying at my mothers for the past 10 years. Either I am an
>A&P and was overseas working or I don't have a license and have been
>here in Florida. That shows that he just spews this stuff to try to
>stir up crap. We'll see how how he is when he isn't hiding behind a
>keyboard probably a whimp and a blimp all rolled into one.

It's both of their standard procedures ,make an accusation designed to harm
someone then refuse to back it up with facts.Both zoom and jaun are poor excuses
for journalists good Journalists have facts ,names ,dates etc. not just a
comment. zoom is jelous of Laurel because she is doing so well without him .Now
that she made Captain she accomplished a lot more in the last few years then
zoom has all his life. A lot of us are very proud of her.

Mr tuff guy jaun met some RAH guys at one of the airshows and he was a mr milk
toast all polite and pleasent.Even brought his kid along to hide behind just in
case.For all his bluster and bravado on the net he was a little mouse when
meeting RAH guys face to face or should I say mano i mano? LOL!!!

No worries Frank he doesn't want to meet you face to face it's easy to be brave
from behind a keyboard. Have a nice vacation and say Hi to Mom for me .

See ya

Chuck (aka el Pollo Loco) S RAH-14/1 ret

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 15th 07, 03:31 PM

> wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Ask your butt buddy to tell you the truth when he left Sebring on
> Thursday,it was within minutes of seeing me.Went out there again today
> but I didn't see him is in hiding?

You sure have some kind of fixation on Jim's butt. Is that why you moved to
Indonesia? :)

> I do have an A&P license for the record I also have a Sr Parachute
> Riggers rating. Again this is unlike your phoney wannabe bull**** buddy
> it is real. Didn't they say something in the NTSB court hearing about
> zzzoomy signing off a reserve without one. What do you have, anything?

You say you have all that, but you're not on the database. I am. Speaks more
about you than it does about anyone else. :)

> I have a better one if I can swing another trip to the States I will
> be at Sun N Fun. I can get in and we know who can't hahahaha !!!!

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Yeah, right, Crisco-Brain. Watch and weep! LOL!

http://www.bd5.com/snf/jimsnf1.jpg
http://www.bd5.com/snf/jimsnf2.jpg
http://www.bd5.com/snf/jimsnf3.jpg
http://www.bd5.com/snf/jimsnf4.jpg
http://www.bd5.com/snf/jimsnf5.jpg

Any more ****forbrains comments you want to make, Mr. Lardbrain? :)

<chuckle> This is just too easy. Typical of stealing candy from overweight
rah gagglers. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 15th 07, 03:32 PM

"red12049" > wrote in message
...

> Juan, all I was "proving" is that your behavior here neither fits nor
> befits the paragraph I quoted from ANN.

And you think you're the judge of that. That's called a "delusion." Look it
up. Then take your meds. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 15th 07, 03:34 PM

"ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
...
> I remember just how fast he ran to call the cops when we ate some of his
> chicken.

As opposed to you mouthing off about ducks in a row for years now, and
claiming jim was taking pictures of you and changing lenses when he only had
one, or that he couldn't get into SNF when it was you who was not anywhere
to be seen when we went looking for you?

All bark, no bite, all mouth, no credibility. LOL! :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Joe Kultgen

January 15th 07, 04:20 PM

ChuckSlusarczyk > wrote in
:

>
> It's both of their standard procedures ,make an accusation designed to
> harm someone then refuse to back it up with facts.Both zoom and jaun
> are poor excuses for journalists good Journalists have facts ,names
> ,dates etc. not just a comment. zoom is jelous of Laurel because she
> is doing so well without him .Now that she made Captain she
> accomplished a lot more in the last few years then zoom has all his
> life. A lot of us are very proud of her.
>
> Mr tuff guy jaun met some RAH guys at one of the airshows and he was a
> mr milk toast all polite and pleasent.Even brought his kid along to
> hide behind just in case.For all his bluster and bravado on the net he
> was a little mouse when meeting RAH guys face to face or should I say
> mano i mano? LOL!!!
>
> No worries Frank he doesn't want to meet you face to face it's easy to
> be brave from behind a keyboard. Have a nice vacation and say Hi to
> Mom for me .
>
> See ya
>
> Chuck (aka el Pollo Loco) S RAH-14/1 ret
>

I'm back to check out the group after a decade of trying to get something
done, (pointless, but I had to try..:-), and I see things haven't changed
much at all.

Chuck, Ron, and a handful of others are still posting mostly on topic.
Zoom has found a new shill. The legal climate for the light aviation
community hasn't changed much. The folks who were doing interesting and
creative things still are. The only trend I've noticed is that they're
less likely to talk about it here. Blogs have entered the scene and it's
much nicer to discuss what you're doing with a closed circle of people
sharing your interests, rather than post in a more public forum. Because
there's still the same mob of self annointed experts howling that
whatever you're doing is impossible. When you demonstrate that you've
been doing it regularly and publicly for years, they switch to howling
about safety issues.

I'm kind of curious about one thing though. Whatever happened to that
guy who was suing the FAA under provisions of the ADA claiming the weight
limits for ultralights discriminated against heavy people?

Later,
Joe

olympusE1

January 15th 07, 04:23 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

>
> You say you have all that, but you're not on the database. I am. Speaks more
> about you than it does about anyone else. :)
>

....ummm, check your facts, Mr. Jimenez, or at least do a search of the
database you're quoting to ensure that what you are saying is remotely
accurate. Mr. Hitlaw is indeed on the FAA database, and has current
A&P and Senior Parachure Rigger (chest) certificates.

That speaks more about you, and your tactics, than it does about anyone
else.

As for yourself, are you the Juan Jimenez with the student ticket since
2000, or the Juan Carlos Jimenez who's had a Private ticket since 1987?

Just curious, mostly so to read the snide reaction you'll undoubtedly
have to this post.

Morgans[_2_]

January 15th 07, 06:23 PM

"Joe Kultgen" > wrote

> I'm kind of curious about one thing though. Whatever happened to that
> guy who was suing the FAA under provisions of the ADA claiming the weight
> limits for ultralights discriminated against heavy people?

That's a new one to me, and I've been around here about 10 years. I may
have forgotten about it if it was way back when, but I can say with some
confidence that there has been nobody around here with that kind of claim,
in the past couple years.

You know as well as anyone that the signal to noise ratio goes up and down,
over time. I would have to say that there is a pretty high noise factor, at
the present time. There have been some interesting discussions, from time
to time. As you could imagine, there has been a fair amount of discussion
about the sport pilot and sport plane rules, with some good points being
made.

For some really interesting (not) stuff, google for treadmill takeoff. You
will see that there are still a lot of dense people around. <g>
--
Jim in NC

Montblack

January 15th 07, 06:28 PM

("Joe Kultgen" wrote)
> I'm kind of curious about one thing though. Whatever happened to that guy
> who was suing the FAA under provisions of the ADA claiming the weight
> limits for ultralights discriminated against heavy people?

This sound delicious...

Any news out there?

Montblack
Under 3 bills ...finally!

Montblack

January 15th 07, 06:36 PM

("Morgans" wrote)
> For some really interesting (not) stuff, google for treadmill takeoff.
> You will see that there are still a lot of dense people around. <g>

HEY!

Montblack

Maxwell

January 15th 07, 06:42 PM

"Morgans" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Joe Kultgen" > wrote
>
>> I'm kind of curious about one thing though. Whatever happened to that
>> guy who was suing the FAA under provisions of the ADA claiming the weight
>> limits for ultralights discriminated against heavy people?
>
> That's a new one to me, and I've been around here about 10 years. I may
> have forgotten about it if it was way back when, but I can say with some
> confidence that there has been nobody around here with that kind of claim,
> in the past couple years.
>
> You know as well as anyone that the signal to noise ratio goes up and
> down, over time. I would have to say that there is a pretty high noise
> factor, at the present time. There have been some interesting
> discussions, from time to time. As you could imagine, there has been a
> fair amount of discussion about the sport pilot and sport plane rules,
> with some good points being made.
>
> For some really interesting (not) stuff, google for treadmill takeoff.
> You will see that there are still a lot of dense people around. <g>
> --
> Jim in NC
>

I didn't turn up much on treadmill takeoff.

Morgans[_2_]

January 15th 07, 06:47 PM

"Montblack" > wrote in message
...
> ("Morgans" wrote)
>> For some really interesting (not) stuff, google for treadmill takeoff.
>> You will see that there are still a lot of dense people around. <g>
>
>
> HEY!

What, hitting too close to home? <GGG>
--
Jim in NC

Morgans[_2_]

January 15th 07, 06:48 PM

"Maxwell" > wrote

> I didn't turn up much on treadmill takeoff.

I didn't intend to say that you, or anyone in particular participated in
that thread.
--
Jim in NC

Maxwell

January 15th 07, 06:53 PM

"Morgans" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Maxwell" > wrote
>
>> I didn't turn up much on treadmill takeoff.
>
> I didn't intend to say that you, or anyone in particular participated in
> that thread.
> --
> Jim in NC
>

Understood. I just wasn't finding anything in the search for
rec.aviation.homebuilt, it was over in piloting.

Morgans[_2_]

January 15th 07, 06:56 PM

"Maxwell" > wrote

> Understood. I just wasn't finding anything in the search for
> rec.aviation.homebuilt, it was over in piloting.

Aaah. Understood. Sorry!
--
Jim in NC

[email protected]

January 15th 07, 07:20 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> "ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
> ...
> > I remember just how fast he ran to call the cops when we ate some of his
> > chicken.
>
> As opposed to you mouthing off about ducks in a row for years now, and
> claiming jim was taking pictures of you and changing lenses when he only had
> one, or that he couldn't get into SNF when it was you who was not anywhere
> to be seen when we went looking for you?
>
> All bark, no bite, all mouth, no credibility. LOL! :)
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Hey jumbo get your stories straight. Now you're saying I was in
Indonesia hiding from your cowardly pal.
Earlier in this thread you said I was here in Sebring for the last 10
years. Other guys didn't have any problem finding me in the data base
why did you?

We need to really get to the bottom of why you left Texas. I know
that Texans don't take well to homosexuals does this have something to
do with your move? I checked your profile(the one right beside your
name here) and found that you have posted on a Homosexual politics news
group. Why does this kind of activity interest you, inquiring minds
want to know?

Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring

[email protected]

January 15th 07, 07:47 PM

wrote:
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
> > "ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > > I remember just how fast he ran to call the cops when we ate some of his
> > > chicken.
> >
> > As opposed to you mouthing off about ducks in a row for years now, and
> > claiming jim was taking pictures of you and changing lenses when he only had
> > one, or that he couldn't get into SNF when it was you who was not anywhere
> > to be seen when we went looking for you?
> >
> > All bark, no bite, all mouth, no credibility. LOL! :)
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>
> Hey jumbo get your stories straight. Now you're saying I was in
> Indonesia hiding from your cowardly pal.
> Earlier in this thread you said I was here in Sebring for the last 10
> years. Other guys didn't have any problem finding me in the data base
> why did you?
>
> We need to really get to the bottom of why you left Texas. I know
> that Texans don't take well to homosexuals does this have something to
> do with your move? I checked your profile(the one right beside your
> name here) and found that you have posted on a Homosexual politics news
> group. Why does this kind of activity interest you, inquiring minds
> want to know?
>
> Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring

For the record,it was posted on alt.politics.homosexuality on Oct
26,2006 at 11:43 am. It's in your profile so fess up why does this type
of activity interest you? Come on tubby tell us.

Wanna bet your butt boy doesn't get into Sun N Fun this year, put up
or shut up!!!

Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring

[email protected]

January 15th 07, 11:14 PM

Montblack wrote:
> ("Joe Kultgen" wrote)
> > I'm kind of curious about one thing though. Whatever happened to that guy
> > who was suing the FAA under provisions of the ADA claiming the weight
> > limits for ultralights discriminated against heavy people?
>
>
> This sound delicious...
>
> Any news out there?
>
>
> Montblack
> Under 3 bills ...finally!

He shouldn't sue the FAA... following the sensible advice of lawyers I
believe it is McDonalds and Burger King responsible for the weight
issues of most American, and television and laziness etc. etc. Sue them
all!!

Joe Kultgen

January 16th 07, 12:00 AM

"Morgans" > wrote in
:

>
> "Joe Kultgen" > wrote
>
>> I'm kind of curious about one thing though. Whatever happened to
>> that guy who was suing the FAA under provisions of the ADA claiming
>> the weight limits for ultralights discriminated against heavy people?
>
> That's a new one to me, and I've been around here about 10 years. I
> may have forgotten about it if it was way back when, but I can say
> with some confidence that there has been nobody around here with that
> kind of claim, in the past couple years.
>

IIRC it was back around '96 and the guy was contending that the FAA limit
of 254 pounds max empty weight made ultralights dangerously unsafe for
anyone much over the FAA standard person weight of 170. I believe he was
looking for an exemption that would let him fly his two person trainer with
a single seat. Ring any bells? I think the guy lived in Florida.

Joe

red12049[_1_]

January 16th 07, 12:29 AM

Ummmm.... Yes, Juan, I am the judge of that, for me. And I can even point
it out to others, so they can make their own judgements, for themselves. As
can you. That is not a delusion Juan, that is life.

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
...
>
> "red12049" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> Juan, all I was "proving" is that your behavior here neither fits nor
>> befits the paragraph I quoted from ANN.
>
> And you think you're the judge of that. That's called a "delusion." Look
> it up. Then take your meds. :)
>
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>

Montblack

January 16th 07, 12:31 AM

wrote)
> For the record,it was posted on alt.politics.homosexuality on Oct 26,2006
> at 11:43 am. It's in your profile so fess up why does this type of
> activity interest you? Come on tubby tell us.

I've got profile info that shows I was at alt.global-warming. It was a
cross-posted thread I answered.

If APH is a newsgroup he reads, and participates in, who the hell are you to
dictate whether that's "approved" or not?

Sorry for coming across tersely, but...

Montblack
"My dear fellow! This isn't Spain ... this is England!"
A Man For All Seasons (1966)
Winner of six Academy Awards - including Best Picture

Morgans[_2_]

January 16th 07, 04:06 AM

"Joe Kultgen" > wrote
>
> IIRC it was back around '96 and the guy was contending that the FAA limit
> of 254 pounds max empty weight made ultralights dangerously unsafe for
> anyone much over the FAA standard person weight of 170. I believe he was
> looking for an exemption that would let him fly his two person trainer
> with
> a single seat. Ring any bells? I think the guy lived in Florida.

Nope. Sorry. I might look for some info tomorrow, if I have any time.
Thanks for the lead.
--
Jim in NC

[email protected]

January 16th 07, 06:09 AM

..
Montblack wrote:
> wrote)
> > For the record,it was posted on alt.politics.homosexuality on Oct 26,2006
> > at 11:43 am. It's in your profile so fess up why does this type of
> > activity interest you? Come on tubby tell us.
>
>
> I've got profile info that shows I was at alt.global-warming. It was a
> cross-posted thread I answered.
>
> If APH is a newsgroup he reads, and participates in, who the hell are you to
> dictate whether that's "approved" or not?
>
> Sorry for coming across tersely, but...
>
>
> Montblack
> "My dear fellow! This isn't Spain ... this is England!"
> A Man For All Seasons (1966)
> Winner of six Academy Awards - including Best Picture

You have to take the previous post with the one you noted. Yawn has
posted more inuendos and flat out lies about me and others on this news
group. Also in the past he has made several post about Dan USAF ret.
Inferring that he had posted on some alternate lifestyle news group.
That really isn't anyones business,however being that yawn is living in
a glass house and throwing stones I was just showing his hypocrisy. I
never said anything about me approving. I did the very same thing to
him he has done to me and others. On the other hand I should have
followed the old sage about getting down in the mud and fighting with a
pig ,you will get dirty and the pig likes that.

Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring

Montblack

January 16th 07, 07:01 AM

)
> You have to take the previous post with the one you noted. Yawn has
> posted more inuendos and flat out lies about me and others on this news
> group. Also in the past he has made several post about Dan USAF ret.
> Inferring that he had posted on some alternate lifestyle news group.
> That really isn't anyones business,however being that yawn is living in
> a glass house and throwing stones I was just showing his hypocrisy. I
> never said anything about me approving. I did the very same thing to
> him he has done to me and others. On the other hand I should have
> followed the old sage about getting down in the mud and fighting with a
> pig ,you will get dirty and the pig likes that.

I enjoy reading JJ, the few times he actually reasons out a reply.
Regrettably, he usually ends up going 'personal' in his posts ...plus, that
whole credibility issue! Oh well.

Like I said before, sorry for the tone - it was the direction I saw
(non-Juan) things heading that made me squirm.

As far a Sebring goes: I bumped into this website tonight and noticed they
were manufactured at Sebring:

http://www.leza-aircam.com/AirCam%20Photos.htm
AirCam

Montblack

ChuckSlusarczyk

January 16th 07, 02:11 PM

In article >, Montblack says...
>
wrote)
>> For the record,it was posted on alt.politics.homosexuality on Oct 26,2006
>> at 11:43 am. It's in your profile so fess up why does this type of
>> activity interest you? Come on tubby tell us.
>
>
>I've got profile info that shows I was at alt.global-warming. It was a
>cross-posted thread I answered.
>
>If APH is a newsgroup he reads, and participates in, who the hell are you to
>dictate whether that's "approved" or not?
>
>Sorry for coming across tersely, but...

I think Frank was making a point here in that this is what jaun does all the
time.He did this with Dan he does it with me and others.Frankly I don't give a
rats patooti what groups jaun likes to visit or whether he's in the closet or
not. That's between him ,his boyfriend , his wife or who ever. What is erksome
are his comments regarding other people and his attempts to hang inuendo on
them. Such as "well at least my kids never were taken by Social Services"
implying that the person he's talking to has had that happen. So I see it as
what's good for the Goose etc.. so I don't sympathize when someone gives jaun a
taste of his own medicine.

See ya

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret

ChuckSlusarczyk

January 16th 07, 09:03 PM

In article >, Richard Riley says...
>>so I don't sympathize when someone gives jaun a
>>taste of his own medicine.
>
>The big taste will be in a few years, when Juan Jr. Googles himself
>and finds his dad. Imagine a teenager full of rebellion hormones
>finding out what that dad is like outside the house.

An even bigger taste will be when jaunito's little buddies do the Googling
....ahhh the joys of peer pressure .Gee jaunito did your Papacito really say all
that stuff on the web?? er, ah, well, ah,not exactly that must be another jaun
jiminez ...yeah that's it ,it's another jaun ,yeah ah that's not my papa it's
somebody else's,yeah that's the ticket ,it's somebody else with the same name
,ah my Papa ain't that dumb to make a jerk of himself on the web No no no not my
Papa he's a journalist,and a test pilot he once taxied a BD-5J 50' down the
driveway. He's a Marine hero ,he told me so and he's got lots of medals ,yeah
that's it lots of medals ah ...yeah he's a journalist ,that's another jaun not
my pop Oh Noooo .....

Chuck(can't wait) S RAH-14/1 ret

ChuckSlusarczyk

January 16th 07, 10:00 PM

In article >, Juan Jimenez says...
>
>
>"ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
...
>> I remember just how fast he ran to call the cops when we ate some of his
>> chicken.
>
>As opposed to you mouthing off about ducks in a row for years now,

don't worry about the Ducks their fine and multiplying..

and
>claiming jim was taking pictures of you and changing lenses when he only had
>one,

He did take my picture it was published on the Awful News Network you know that
so why are you lying that he didn't?? As far as the lens goes I saw him put the
long lens on maybe he didn't have another one but so what? He still took a
picture of me and Bink in our booth and I have a picture of him with the long
lens on his camera taken by one of my guys .So what!!

>or that he couldn't get into SNF when it was you who was not anywhere
>to be seen when we went looking for you?

He isn't allowed into SnF and he got in by a fluke, if you couldn't find me you
weren't looking .If you were looking for me somebody around my booth would have
said so, everyone in my booth knows what zoom looks like.

>
>All bark, no bite, all mouth, no credibility. LOL! :)

Say what you want but I test flew all the planes I ever built so it's not all
bark-bite and mouth .That description fits you way better then me OH Great
Coward to test fly your BD lawn dart. As far as credibility goes it's not my
credibility that's in doubt around here.I didn't have to sneak into SnF and hope
certain people didn't see me because believe me I wish I would have spotted zoom
on the grounds just to watch how fast they threw his butt out.LOL!!!

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret

DABEAR

January 17th 07, 09:54 AM

wrote:
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
> > Yo Hitlaw, have you been spotted at the Sebring show? <chuckle>

> I looked around
> behind him expecting to find you liplocked to his ass but fortunately
> for you I had no such luck.

<snipped>

> Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring,

Aw, but Frank, Juan's more efficient than that. In a true, tribue to
Darwin's theory, he no longer lip locks anymore. He's "evolved" into
Captain's Zoom's rectum! That's why he appeared to be missing. If not
for the smell, there'd be no way to know he's in the area...LOL!!!

DABEAR

January 17th 07, 10:10 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

Well, if it isn't Yawnita. Back jackin' her jaw again.

Hey, Juan ~ I hear I got a stalker...am I going to have to get a
restraining order on you?

I wouldn't bother...saves me having to come find you, Netizen.

The exposes on you two "Vietnam Veterans" will be up shortly. Your
buddy My Lai Jim ought to be pretty happy, knowing how he loves the
publicity.

DABEAR

January 17th 07, 10:15 AM

wrote:

>
> Please explain the comment about meeting women. I can't figure out
> what you are talking about and I am pretty sure you don't know either.
>
> Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring

Too many goats in Puerto Rico...doesn't need women since he can have
sex anytime he wants, providing he can tape the goat's mouth so the
goat tenders don't find out...

YEE HAW, Juan! RIDE 'EM COWBOY!

One of these days he might just buy his own ~ so hear it scream! You
know ~ when the goat sess him coming...

JUAAAAAAANNNN!!! DAA~ DY!

DABEAR

January 17th 07, 10:18 AM

wrote:

> zzzzoom spots me turns pale, hides,then flees. The real gut buster
> was the next thing he does is to notify the other half of the bull****
> brotherhood.
>
> Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring

Are you sure that it's you that Zoom is afraid of? I hear he's scared
of his shadow because it looks like Juan Jimenez, is glued to his a$$
and is constantly trying to hump him! With his nose!

DABEAR

January 17th 07, 10:22 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> LOL! Last time I weighed myself was last week. 225, bubba. Do you even own a
> scale?

Yeah, but Juan, that's just the fat waves around your neck! Did you
forget the mention the two tons...

....between your ears!

Should have laid off those C-rations in Vietnam, boy. Especially the
John Wayne bars...and the pound cake.

And if ol' Frank let you use his scale, he'd have to wear a flak vest
and helmet himself, and dig a fox hole for cover when the damned thing
exploded after you put your two love handles on it...

....you know..."love handles!"

What Captain Zoom calls your "Ears."

DABEAR

January 17th 07, 10:25 AM

wrote:

> I can understand that your mother wouldn't want you to stay with her
> while you were on vacation.

Juan outlived his welcome in the goat pen, trying to interbreed with
other family members.

>Mine kind of likes to see me once in a while.

Juan's a$$ is so big there's no "not" seeing him.

I hear the Greek Navy likes to use it as a "target."

DABEAR

January 17th 07, 10:29 AM

wrote:

> If not crawl back under your rock or more likely crawl
> back up zzzooms ass.

He is Zoom's ass. Just tell him to pucker, Frank. That'll shut him
up. Then watch as Zoom explodes from constipation. Considering how
full of crap he already is, it will take less than sixty seconds.

DABEAR

January 17th 07, 10:35 AM

red12049 wrote:

> I truly wish that those who go to the ANN site could read the above, and
> then be given a quick tour here. Try telling those readers that your
> personna here is not who you "really" are, and that you act this way just
> for fun. Actions, Juan, not words.

Juan doesn't seem to be part of that team anymore. He thinks he's a
Journalist, but knows nothing about the First Amendment and likes to
spend his "Journalist" time on USENET telling people "STFU!"

So much for Juan's concept of "Freedom of Speech"

Proof that Juan was never in Vietnam ~ he wouldn't be here today. His
"fellow" Marines would have frag'd the traitor! I'm surprised his
family hasn't, ahhh, but the night is still young...

DABEAR

January 17th 07, 10:39 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> You calling _me_ porky, you half-wit mastodon? LOL! That's funny! *8)

"Porky Pig" Jimenez...the one that likes to slide up to the trough and
say "That's Not All Folks! I'm still a work in progress!"

Yeah, and so's a Black Hole...

DABEAR

January 17th 07, 10:43 AM

red12049 wrote:

> > Your chosen mama's dress in which you choose to hide speaks perfectly to
> > the content of your post. Gibberish indeed! LOL!
>
> If you wish to speak of gibberish, look no further than the sentence above.

Don't forget the "half-wit Mastadon" comment! I hear even to come up
with these lines, Yawnita has to plagarize what his wife has to say to
him...LOL!

DABEAR

January 17th 07, 10:48 AM

ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:

..Maybe you should have told zoom
> that jaun said you didn't have the balls to meet zoom face to face. I guess we
> all know who lacks the testicular fortitude round these parts,and it ain't you
> LOL!!!
>
> Chuck S

Now, Chuck, that's not true! Jim Campbell has ALWAYS had the
"Testicular Fortitude!" It just imploded when he was a teenager and
he's spent the rest of his life "Feelin' like a woman," as Shania Twain
might put it!

Constantly going through life with a man's testicles in his mouth...in
particular, his own! LOL!!!

DABEAR

January 17th 07, 11:00 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> All bark, no bite, all mouth, no credibility. LOL! :)

Man! That's worse than the pot calling the kettle "black1" That's the
"sex pot" calling the kettle "kinky!"

Juan has to plagarize to use the word "credibility" in a sentence!
Still doesn't know what the word means!

DABEAR

January 17th 07, 11:06 AM

wrote:

I checked your profile(the one right beside your
> name here) and found that you have posted on a Homosexual politics news
> group. Why does this kind of activity interest you, inquiring minds
> want to know?

Well, he thinks he's a Super Hero like Captain Zoom, but ain't nothing
more or less than an ugly fat man hanging around with a sixteen year
old boy taking pictures of each other.

As close as ol' Yawnita will get to "Super Hero Status" will be
watching "Porkins" get toasted in the movie Star Wars!

Yeah, ol' "Porko" would eat Captain Zoom's s--t for a mile just to see
where it came from...

DABEAR

January 17th 07, 11:08 AM

Montblack wrote:
> ("Joe Kultgen" wrote)
> > I'm kind of curious about one thing though. Whatever happened to that guy
> > who was suing the FAA under provisions of the ADA claiming the weight
> > limits for ultralights discriminated against heavy people?
>
>
> This sound delicious...
>
> Any news out there?

Yeah, I hear he built the World's Smallest BD-5 as revenge, but revenge
isn't complete until you can fit your fat a$$ into the cockpit and fly
the thing without crashing and burning on an El Pollo Loco grill...

DABEAR

January 17th 07, 11:16 AM

ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:

>so I don't sympathize when someone gives jaun a
> taste of his own medicine.
>
> See ya
>
> Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret

Right on! And when you do, you're actually giving Captain Zoom a taste
of his own medicine, since Yumping Yimenez is nothing more or less than
a sock puppet and mouthpiece for Jim Campbell. Campbell is too afraid
to show here himself anymore...so he sends and coaches Yawnita.

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 17th 07, 03:52 PM

"olympusE1" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> ...ummm, check your facts, Mr. Jimenez, or at least do a search of the
> database you're quoting to ensure that what you are saying is remotely
> accurate. Mr. Hitlaw is indeed on the FAA database, and has current
> A&P and Senior Parachure Rigger (chest) certificates.

No, he's not. There is no Hitlaw in the database, either in the US or in
Indonesia.

> As for yourself, are you the Juan Jimenez with the student ticket since
> 2000, or the Juan Carlos Jimenez who's had a Private ticket since 1987?

Neither. I have a private ticket, single and multiengine land, and I have
never been off the database. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 17th 07, 03:55 PM

> wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> "ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > I remember just how fast he ran to call the cops when we ate some of
>> > his
>> > chicken.
>>
>> As opposed to you mouthing off about ducks in a row for years now, and
>> claiming jim was taking pictures of you and changing lenses when he only
>> had
>> one, or that he couldn't get into SNF when it was you who was not
>> anywhere
>> to be seen when we went looking for you?
>>
>> All bark, no bite, all mouth, no credibility. LOL! :)
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>
> Hey jumbo get your stories straight. Now you're saying I was in
> Indonesia hiding from your cowardly pal.

Ah, no, Frankieboy, not even close. You were in Indonesia, but it appears it
was about your fixations with men's butts, not about Jim per se. :)

I know it's difficult for you, but try to follow the thread. :)

> We need to really get to the bottom of why you left Texas. I know
> that Texans don't take well to homosexuals does this have something to
> do with your move?

My, you're _really_ fixated on homosexuals, eh? I think we are indeed
getting very close to the core of your problems.

I left Texas for something you will never understand, for the benefit of my
son's education. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 17th 07, 03:55 PM

> wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> For the record,it was posted on alt.politics.homosexuality on Oct
> 26,2006 at 11:43 am. It's in your profile so fess up why does this type
> of activity interest you? Come on tubby tell us.

Politics has always interested, and so has fighting bigotry.

What's your excuse, ugly? :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 17th 07, 03:56 PM

> wrote in message
ps.com...
> .
> Montblack wrote:
>> wrote)
>> > For the record,it was posted on alt.politics.homosexuality on Oct
>> > 26,2006
>> > at 11:43 am. It's in your profile so fess up why does this type of
>> > activity interest you? Come on tubby tell us.
>>
>>
>> I've got profile info that shows I was at alt.global-warming. It was a
>> cross-posted thread I answered.
>>
>> If APH is a newsgroup he reads, and participates in, who the hell are you
>> to
>> dictate whether that's "approved" or not?
>>
>> Sorry for coming across tersely, but...
>>
>>
>> Montblack
>> "My dear fellow! This isn't Spain ... this is England!"
>> A Man For All Seasons (1966)
>> Winner of six Academy Awards - including Best Picture
>
> You have to take the previous post with the one you noted.

<mercy snip>

translation: ("OUCH! Damn, that bitch slap hurt! Do it again!")
hahahahahaha!!!!

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 17th 07, 03:58 PM

"Richard Riley" > wrote in message
...
>
> The big taste will be in a few years, when Juan Jr. Googles himself
> and finds his dad. Imagine a teenager full of rebellion hormones
> finding out what that dad is like outside the house.

Hate to burst your bubble yet again boy, but my son already knows exactly
what I post. Unlike you, I have no need to hide what I write from children,
mine or otherwise. <chuckle>

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 17th 07, 03:59 PM

"ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
...
> In article >, Richard Riley
> says...
>>>so I don't sympathize when someone gives jaun a
>>>taste of his own medicine.
>>
>>The big taste will be in a few years, when Juan Jr. Googles himself
>>and finds his dad. Imagine a teenager full of rebellion hormones
>>finding out what that dad is like outside the house.
>
> An even bigger taste will be when jaunito's little buddies do the
> Googling
> ...ahhh the joys of peer pressure .

Is that kinda like the joys of peer pressure when beloved billionaire war
heros die in things you build? :)

good thing my son will never have to sue me to get paid for honest work. nor
will he ever have to worry about child abuse. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 17th 07, 04:00 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
>
>>so I don't sympathize when someone gives jaun a
>> taste of his own medicine.
>>
>> See ya
>>
>> Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret
>
> Right on! And when you do, you're actually giving Captain Zoom a taste
> of his own medicine,

<mercy snip>

Yo, lardball, ChuckSteak has been yapping about ducks in a row and trying to
get even with Jim for years. It's never worked for him, and it will never
work for you either. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 17th 07, 04:00 PM

"red12049" > wrote in message
...
> Ummmm.... Yes, Juan, I am the judge of that, for me. And I can even point
> it out to others, so they can make their own judgements, for themselves.
> As can you. That is not a delusion Juan, that is life.

That's what "reverends" do as well. Knock yourself out. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 17th 07, 04:03 PM

"ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
...
> In article >, Juan Jimenez
> says...
>>
>>
>>"ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
...
>>> I remember just how fast he ran to call the cops when we ate some of his
>>> chicken.
>>
>>As opposed to you mouthing off about ducks in a row for years now,
>
> don't worry about the Ducks their fine and multiplying..

And doing absolutely nothing but making a stink in your backyard. All bark,
no bite, all yapping, no credibility. :)

> As far as the lens goes I saw him put the
> long lens on maybe he didn't have another one but so what?

So what is that you're a liar. Always have been, always will be. :)

> He still took a picture of me and Bink in our booth and I have a picture
> of him with the long
> lens on his camera taken by one of my guys .So what!!

Oh, boohoo, ChuckieSteak is angry someone took a picture of him! Someone
give the boy a tissue. :)

> He isn't allowed into SnF and he got in by a fluke

A fluke indeed, right through the front door when the SNF management told
him he couldn't have a press pass but could buy a ticket. Riiiiight. :)

<chuckle>

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 17th 07, 04:04 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>

Looks like someone finally dug the tub-o-lard and his mother from the
Colorado snow. Still living in that motel room with your ma? :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 17th 07, 04:06 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Montblack wrote:
>> ("Joe Kultgen" wrote)
>> > I'm kind of curious about one thing though. Whatever happened to that
>> > guy
>> > who was suing the FAA under provisions of the ADA claiming the weight
>> > limits for ultralights discriminated against heavy people?
>>
>>
>> This sound delicious...
>>
>> Any news out there?
>
> Yeah, I hear he built the World's Smallest BD-5 as revenge, but revenge
> isn't complete until you can fit your fat a$$ into the cockpit and fly
> the thing without crashing and burning on an El Pollo Loco grill...

Sorry, bubba, but I can fit into my BD-5. Is there _any_ cockpit into which
all 400+ lbs of you can be squished into?

That also happens to explain why you can't come up with any proof of
aviation experience. Not only do you have none, you couldn't get any even if
you tried, other than buying double seats on Southwest. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

ChuckSlusarczyk

January 17th 07, 05:56 PM

In article >, Juan Jimenez says...
>
>Is that kinda like the joys of peer pressure when beloved billionaire war
>heros die in things you build? :)

The NTSB probable cause says it all my conscience is clear .But I do feel bad
it happened.

>
>good thing my son will never have to sue me to get paid for honest work. nor
>will he ever have to worry about child abuse. :)

Once again I'll ask what son sued me for "honest work" Name please ,when etc.
Credibility jaunita ,it's about credibility .

Child abuse?? What child abuse?? Same reply what child ,when ,where? Credibility
jaun ,it's about credibility and you still have none. Prove what you say that's
all. What a phony you are and I bet your son is just as bad :-)

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret
>
>

olympusE1

January 17th 07, 06:09 PM

yes, he is. check it again, Mr. Jimenez.

here's the link to the query page.

https://amsrvs.registry.faa.gov/airmeninquiry/default.asp

you are wrong. let's see if you are adult enough to admit it.

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> "olympusE1" > wrote in message
> ups.com...
> >
> > ...ummm, check your facts, Mr. Jimenez, or at least do a search of the
> > database you're quoting to ensure that what you are saying is remotely
> > accurate. Mr. Hitlaw is indeed on the FAA database, and has current
> > A&P and Senior Parachure Rigger (chest) certificates.
>
> No, he's not. There is no Hitlaw in the database, either in the US or in
> Indonesia.
>
> > As for yourself, are you the Juan Jimenez with the student ticket since
> > 2000, or the Juan Carlos Jimenez who's had a Private ticket since 1987?
>
> Neither. I have a private ticket, single and multiengine land, and I have
> never been off the database. :)
>
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

BobR

January 17th 07, 06:37 PM

>
> I left Texas for something you will never understand, for the benefit of my
> son's education. :)
>

That is probably the first thing you have ever written that I could
actually believe without some question.

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> > wrote in message
> ups.com...
> >
> > Juan Jimenez wrote:
> >> "ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> > I remember just how fast he ran to call the cops when we ate some of
> >> > his
> >> > chicken.
> >>
> >> As opposed to you mouthing off about ducks in a row for years now, and
> >> claiming jim was taking pictures of you and changing lenses when he only
> >> had
> >> one, or that he couldn't get into SNF when it was you who was not
> >> anywhere
> >> to be seen when we went looking for you?
> >>
> >> All bark, no bite, all mouth, no credibility. LOL! :)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
> >
> > Hey jumbo get your stories straight. Now you're saying I was in
> > Indonesia hiding from your cowardly pal.
>
> Ah, no, Frankieboy, not even close. You were in Indonesia, but it appears it
> was about your fixations with men's butts, not about Jim per se. :)
>
> I know it's difficult for you, but try to follow the thread. :)
>
> > We need to really get to the bottom of why you left Texas. I know
> > that Texans don't take well to homosexuals does this have something to
> > do with your move?
>
> My, you're _really_ fixated on homosexuals, eh? I think we are indeed
> getting very close to the core of your problems.
>
> I left Texas for something you will never understand, for the benefit of my
> son's education. :)
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

ChuckSlusarczyk

January 17th 07, 08:41 PM

In article >, Juan Jimenez says...
>
>
>"DABEAR" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>>
>> ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
>>
>>>so I don't sympathize when someone gives jaun a
>>> taste of his own medicine.
>>>
>>> See ya
>>>
>>> Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret
>>
>> Right on! And when you do, you're actually giving Captain Zoom a taste
>> of his own medicine,
>
><mercy snip>
>
>Yo, lardball,

(sounds like he's talking to me )

> ChuckSteak has been yapping about ducks in a row and trying to
>get even with Jim for years.

(now it sounds like he's talking to someone else)

>It's never worked for him, and it will never
>work for you either. :)

(I guess he's still talking to someone else who is trying to get even with zoom)

Maybe I'm confused but just who is jaun addressing at the same time to different
people ? :-) Ahhh what a journalist and what mastery of the English
language.LOL!!!

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret.

ChuckSlusarczyk

January 17th 07, 08:49 PM

In article >, Juan Jimenez says...
>
>> He isn't allowed into SnF and he got in by a fluke
>
>A fluke indeed, right through the front door when the SNF management told
>him he couldn't have a press pass but could buy a ticket. Riiiiight. :)

Management said it was alright? NOT Some lower level guy made a decision to let
him in unaware of zooms true status.If Management would have known zoom would
have been arrested on the spot. Besides I had a $100 reward to anyone who
spotted zoom and told me where he was. Gee you could have made a $100. In fact
the reward still holds true at this years SnF so if all zoom has to do is buy a
ticket and get in, then have him come to me and collect the $100.Shouldn't be a
problem if it's all legit...

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret

red12049[_1_]

January 17th 07, 11:33 PM

Do you have a problem with reverends, or other religious professionals?

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
...
>
> "red12049" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Ummmm.... Yes, Juan, I am the judge of that, for me. And I can even
>> point it out to others, so they can make their own judgements, for
>> themselves. As can you. That is not a delusion Juan, that is life.
>
> That's what "reverends" do as well. Knock yourself out. :)
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>

ChuckSlusarczyk

January 18th 07, 01:02 AM

In article >, Juan Jimenez says...
>
>
> wrote in message
ups.com...
>>
>> For the record,it was posted on alt.politics.homosexuality on Oct
>> 26,2006 at 11:43 am. It's in your profile so fess up why does this type
>> of activity interest you? Come on tubby tell us.
>
>Politics has always interested, and so has fighting bigotry.

Fighting bigotry?? LOL!! on the alt politics homosexuality group ??? LOL!!!
go get 'em tiger.
If I said ...Yup I went to the nudist page ...but I didn't look I'm just
fighting bigotry against nudists next I went to fight bigotry at the naked ladys
page ...Yess sur reee bob I'm fightin' bigotry ...I don't care what pages you go
to as I said before it's between you ,your boyfriend ,your wife or who ever
..Just don't be so judgemental towards other people when maybe you got something
in the closet. By the way It's OK to come out of the closet frankly I don't give
a hoot.

>
>What's your excuse, ugly? :)

Ugly???? sounds like a bigot statement to me, uttered by MR Bigot fighter hmmmm
I guess you only fight certain bigotry.Bigotry toward ugly people don't count I
guess.

What a PHONY

Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret

olympusE1

January 18th 07, 01:24 AM

Fighting bigotry? Jimenez? Oh please. Here is a little ditty he
posted on dfw.politics:

"So, now you white trash ****forbrains don't like it that Pizza Patron
has a
policy of accepting pesos in payment for pizzas, just like other
companies
along the border such as Wal-Mart, HEB Supermarkets and other
businesses do
along the border?

Take your bull**** whining somewhere else, dip****s. This is America.
Nobody
gives a damn what you hypocritical useless, lazy schmucks think about
this.
We already OWN Texas. Don't like it? Pick up your fat white asses, pack
your
ugly big hair bitches and move. That's right. Get the **** out.

But remember, wherever you go, you will find we already there, so
either
shut the **** up and deal with it, or find some other country that'll
tolerate your whining."

Sounds a bit "pink" to me...

> Fighting bigotry?? LOL!! on the alt politics homosexuality group ??? LOL!!!
> go get 'em tiger.
> If I said ...Yup I went to the nudist page ...but I didn't look I'm just
> fighting bigotry against nudists next I went to fight bigotry at the naked ladys
> page ...Yess sur reee bob I'm fightin' bigotry ...I don't care what pages you go
> to as I said before it's between you ,your boyfriend ,your wife or who ever
> .Just don't be so judgemental towards other people when maybe you got something
> in the closet. By the way It's OK to come out of the closet frankly I don't give
> a hoot.
>
> >
> >What's your excuse, ugly? :)
>
>
> Ugly???? sounds like a bigot statement to me, uttered by MR Bigot fighter hmmmm
> I guess you only fight certain bigotry.Bigotry toward ugly people don't count I
> guess.
>
> What a PHONY
>
> Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret

DABEAR

January 18th 07, 03:09 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> Looks like someone finally dug the tub-o-lard and his mother from the
> Colorado snow. Still living in that motel room with your ma? :)

Hey Juan ~ your wife still doing that act with the Donkey in Tijuana!?
I heard her fat ugly man was layered in all areas but two, and one of
those areas was the feet...

....strange name for her act: "The BJ in TJ!" I wonder what that could
mean...

DABEAR

January 18th 07, 03:13 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> I left Texas for something you will never understand, for the benefit of my
> son's education. :)

Yeah, and Waco just wasn't happening for you...

....have you tried Guyana?

DABEAR

January 18th 07, 03:19 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> Sorry, bubba, but I can fit into my BD-5. Is there _any_ cockpit into which
> all 400+ lbs of you can be squished into?
>
> That also happens to explain why you can't come up with any proof of
> aviation experience. Not only do you have none, you couldn't get any even if
> you tried, other than buying double seats on Southwest. :)

Hey Porky! If you could fit that cockpit, you'd be flying! I hear you
can't even fit Donkey Girl's cockpit...some material defect (beyond the
mental defects) related to your tiny feet. You know, if you wouldn't
stick them in your mouth so much, they wouldn't shrink. Same with
another portion of your anatomy...related to your feet.

Yep, get that boy a BD-5J-A380! And a "lollipop!" Preferably,
Campbell's, so both can sleep.

DABEAR

January 18th 07, 03:45 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> Yo, lardball, ChuckSteak has been yapping about ducks in a row and trying to
> get even with Jim for years. It's never worked for him, and it will never
> work for you either. :)

www.waterworkscase.com

It's not about getting even...it's about exposing not one, but now two
dangerous fakes, frauds, individuals that are dangers to themselves and
for that matter, others.

Fake Vietnam Veterans in particular. Fake "pilots." "Fake "Aviation
Experts." Add to that, Two "guys" who claim flying exploits
extraordinaire, but don't have the logbooks to back it up. Both have
many things in common, including pathological lying, aircraft they
don't fly, a love for each other's rear ends and getting their fannies
waxed twenty-five times a day by the RAH-14 and people not even
associated with the RAH-14...just individuals that know sleeze when
they see it.

And as for "lardball," it's fun to watch that fat condom around the
base of your pecker-head ~ you know, the one your neck is suffocating
in ~ shimmy when you talk, Pork Rind!

And I love how you plagarize others to come with your insults because,
like your butt buddy the assclown Jim Campbell, neither of you have any
originality. Anal-ity, perhaps, but never originality.

I laugh even when you say you "left Texas." We call that a "Cattle
Drive" seeing as how your heffer ass equates to three and a half herds.
But when you say you left for the benefit of your son's education, I
have to highly doubt that one unless of course...

....you left your son behind!

No sixteen year old should be hanging with a fat ugly man who is
nothing more or less in life than "mediocre" ~ which explains why he is
nothing "more" nor is he "less." Other than in the fat department...

And as for your BD-5J ~ not only are you yellow and afraid to fly it,
even better ~ you're trying to apply "legal clauses" to a sale that's
never going to happen, because legal clauses are attached to the
contract.

My belief is that thing is loaded down with "Unapproved Parts!"
Dangerous ones at that! Otherwise, you'd be flying it, not trying to
sell it off for a "Moto-glider," since you obviously can't handle a
"High Performance Aircraft" versus the "Moped of the Air." I doubt you
could handle a moped on the ground.

You let me know if you get the courage to try once your knees stop
shaking, either from fear or the tonnage they're trying to
support...and that's just in stretch marks.

It's like that old joke: A man asks a kid what he would do if he saw
two trains about to collide...

The kid says "I'd go get my cousin!" The man replies, "Could your
cousin stop the accident from happening!?" And the kids says...

"No, he just loves train wrecks!"

Oh, and people here have been asking you and Captain Peckerhead to
provide your logbooks and True Aviation Experience for what looks like
"years." No doubt about that in "Boom's" history, because I have
thirty years plus of that history between the internet and the
documentation I've received. On top of everything else, the two of you
are Fake Journalists as well, which is a whole new danger that
positions you two assclowns to do tremendous damage to the reputations
of other Journalists as well.

So, I've made you the deal before, I'll make it to you again.

Let's all get together with our information in one place, at one time,
with all our fellow members of the Press ~ well, at least mine, since
you boys are fakes and frauds ~ and layout the information for all to
see. Have RAH-14 there and anyone from this group or others who wants
to know the Truth about who has what experience and who doesn't. We
can make that meeting for an Air Show that we'll all be attending, like
Oshkosh, with its massive Press Corps presence so no one gets missed.

That's right Porky Pig...I don't tolerate hippo-creeps (hypocrites).
How about we meet at the Ultralight field at Oshkosh and settle all
affairs there?

Balls in your court...not to mention...your mouth, Pork Rind!

Montblack

January 18th 07, 03:54 AM

("DABEAR" wrote)
> ...have you tried Guyana?

Yes. :-)

http://www.rum.cz/galery/sam/gy/demerara/img/gy12.jpg
Mmm... 5 Year Old Rum <g>

Margene's brother-in-law is from Guyana. He went home for a visit and
brought back bottles of the '12 Year Old Rum' and some '5 Year Old Rum.' We
ended up with a couple of bottles. I do believe one of the bottles ended up
flying down to Iowa City last Thanksgiving, in a Pathfinder.

<http://www.alexisparkinn.com/Photogallery2/2005-Thanksgiving/sJoe%20&%20a%20bottle%20of%20rum%20with%20Atlas%20in%20sno w%2011-05.jpg>
The teenager pirated his parent's bottle.

<http://www.alexisparkinn.com/Photogallery2/2005-Thanksgiving/sJoe%20&%20a%20bottle%20of%20rum2%20with%20Atlas%20in%20sn ow%2011-05.jpg>
Guyana Rum heading for its new home.

Montblack-wants-a-cracker

Dan[_2_]

January 18th 07, 04:08 AM

DABEAR wrote:
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>> Looks like someone finally dug the tub-o-lard and his mother from the
>> Colorado snow. Still living in that motel room with your ma? :)
>
> Hey Juan ~ your wife still doing that act with the Donkey in Tijuana!?
> I heard her fat ugly man was layered in all areas but two, and one of
> those areas was the feet...
>
> ...strange name for her act: "The BJ in TJ!" I wonder what that could
> mean...
>

Y'know, it's one thing to attack a person personally and another to
attack that person's family. I personally feel family is off limits. I
don't see the need to stoop to yawn's level.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

BobR

January 18th 07, 04:14 AM

DABEAR wrote:
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>
> > I left Texas for something you will never understand, for the benefit of my
> > son's education. :)
>
> Yeah, and Waco just wasn't happening for you...
>
> ...have you tried Guyana?

Just think of it this way, Like father like son. Now do you doubt his
statement?

ChuckSlusarczyk

January 18th 07, 04:33 AM

In article m>, olympusE1
says...
>
>Fighting bigotry? Jimenez? Oh please. Here is a little ditty he
>posted on dfw.politics:
>
>"So, now you white trash ****forbrains don't like it that Pizza Patron
>has a
>policy of accepting pesos in payment for pizzas, just like other
>companies
>along the border such as Wal-Mart, HEB Supermarkets and other
>businesses do
>along the border?
>
>Take your bull**** whining somewhere else, dip****s. This is America.
>Nobody
>gives a damn what you hypocritical useless, lazy schmucks think about
>this.
>We already OWN Texas. Don't like it? Pick up your fat white asses, pack
>your
>ugly big hair bitches and move. That's right. Get the **** out.
>
>But remember, wherever you go, you will find we already there, so
>either
>shut the **** up and deal with it, or find some other country that'll
>tolerate your whining."

If "our" jaun wrote that then it speaks volumes about him.Talk about a
bigot.He's right about one thing tho,this is America and if we don't wake up
there will be a whole lot more of jauns and their attitudes like "We already OWN
Texas" Thanks jaun for those eye opening comments. I'm sending another $100 to
the Minutemen tomorrow because of you. THIS IS America and you'd better learn to
speak English and if your illegal get the hell out. You just made me more fed up
with the illegals.

Chuck S

olympusE1

January 18th 07, 04:46 AM

....yes, "our" juan wrote it... he must have, because, as a world famous
journalist and contributor to the Aero Snooze Service (ASS) he WOULD
know that if you put something, which someone else said, on paper (or
its digital equivalent) you must put quotes around it, as I did when I
included it in my post. no quotes, no attribution... QED, it is the
spew of Jimenez.

BTW, Mr. Hitlaw, I have an address in Singapore you might be interested
in visiting this spring.

ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
> In article m>, olympusE1
> says...
> >
> >Fighting bigotry? Jimenez? Oh please. Here is a little ditty he
> >posted on dfw.politics:
> >
> >"So, now you white trash ****forbrains don't like it that Pizza Patron
> >has a
> >policy of accepting pesos in payment for pizzas, just like other
> >companies
> >along the border such as Wal-Mart, HEB Supermarkets and other
> >businesses do
> >along the border?
> >
> >Take your bull**** whining somewhere else, dip****s. This is America.
> >Nobody
> >gives a damn what you hypocritical useless, lazy schmucks think about
> >this.
> >We already OWN Texas. Don't like it? Pick up your fat white asses, pack
> >your
> >ugly big hair bitches and move. That's right. Get the **** out.
> >
> >But remember, wherever you go, you will find we already there, so
> >either
> >shut the **** up and deal with it, or find some other country that'll
> >tolerate your whining."
>
> If "our" jaun wrote that then it speaks volumes about him.Talk about a
> bigot.He's right about one thing tho,this is America and if we don't wake up
> there will be a whole lot more of jauns and their attitudes like "We already OWN
> Texas" Thanks jaun for those eye opening comments. I'm sending another $100 to
> the Minutemen tomorrow because of you. THIS IS America and you'd better learn to
> speak English and if your illegal get the hell out. You just made me more fed up
> with the illegals.
>
> Chuck S

DABEAR

January 18th 07, 05:07 AM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

>Politics has always interested, and so has fighting bigotry.

>What's your excuse, ugly? :)

This man is too stupid to see and understand what he has just written.

Perhaps he should spend his time fighting for his own literacy, because
I question whether or not he fights against bigotry, as he might allude
here, or rather ~ in fact ~ fights for bigotry and practices it daily
in his USENET posts as the Archie Bunker of Puerto Rico.

He certainly doesn't fight for the First Amendment.

His own bigotry is repesentative of his own literacy, the former being
substantial, the latter being so insignificant that he has yet to
impress anyone here.

All in all ~ what we have here in Juan Jimenez is a waste of a human
life.

A "Hundred Dollar An Hour Teacher" who flies all over the World!

More like a "Hundred Dollar Hooker" who has never seen a payday and her
ignorance is the reason why.

Morgans[_2_]

January 18th 07, 05:20 AM

"Dan" > wrote

> Y'know, it's one thing to attack a person personally and another to
> attack that person's family. I personally feel family is off limits. I
> don't see the need to stoop to yawn's level.

DABEAR has long ago gone below the levels of decency I would expect to find
here, on his way to insulting another. It does not matter how much it is
deserved, to me.

It matters how you go about it. The pride you keep in yourself.

There is no high ground anywhere around these exchanges, anymore. Isn't it
about time for this round to end?
--
Jim in NC

DABEAR

January 18th 07, 05:26 AM

Dan wrote:

> Y'know, it's one thing to attack a person personally and another to
> attack that person's family. I personally feel family is off limits. I
> don't see the need to stoop to yawn's level.
>
> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

My job as an Alternative Journalist is to get down to the levels of
others that some people in Journalism feel they are to "high up" to
stoop to. That is their mistake. That is the greatest mistake made
these days by Mainstream Media and the people get hurt in the process.

Guys like Juan claim the High Road and put their victims into the High
Road level scenario, so that they can avoid attack on the Low Road they
pursue in life and in reality. Which means that Juan makes a Low Road
attack, burdens his victim with a High Road response based on their
conscience, not his, and will often get away with his crime as a
result, because others do prefer to stick to the High Road, even when
the dredges of life are trying to act "the conscience."

My method preaches this: "meet them on the Low Road, wait for them in
the shadows with a Louisville Slugger, and not only beat the s--t out
of them when they show, but anyone who shows with them. Family,
Friends, Accessories included. Teach them the lesson and exaggerate
the lesson through escalation. See what the Low Road crybabies do then
when they get a taste of their own medicine.

....but never instigate the attack! Only respond when the other guy
instigates. Which is what I'm doing.

It is about giving them a taste of their own medicine. Something that
Yawn and his Master, James R. Campbell, who can't show his face here
(so he sends Yawn to do his bidding,) are really going to hate in the
days to come. And as for those days to come, I'm talking about the
remainder of their worthless, yellow, lives.

Review the attacks Mr. Jimenez has made on the family members of others
today. See if he didn't attack first. See if he didn't attack someone
else's family before mine (Mr. Hitlaw's).

Mr. Hitlaw owns Juan Jimenez, Jim Campbell and the other dredges of
Society like them.

I'm not interested in ownership of these types. I'm interested in
their personal destruction at their own hands, and speeding them on
greased roller skates towards that end.

You could have spoke to Mr. Jimenez first but didn't. But that's all
right...I like to protect my own, anyway.

If Mr. Jimenez were as concerned about family as you are, he would not
insult the families of others. Therefore, Mr. Jimenez is going to
learn the hard way by enduring one hundred fold the rubbish he heaps on
the families of others, and for that matter, innocent others anywhere
his stink exists.

And he will have no one to blame in the end but himself.

DABEAR

January 18th 07, 05:30 AM

BobR wrote:

> Just think of it this way, Like father like son. Now do you doubt his
> statement?

I totally agree. And it is a constant, never-ending, tragedy.

DABEAR

January 18th 07, 05:41 AM

Morgans wrote:

> DABEAR has long ago gone below the levels of decency I would expect to find
> here, on his way to insulting another. It does not matter how much it is
> deserved, to me.
>
> It matters how you go about it. The pride you keep in yourself.
>
> There is no high ground anywhere around these exchanges, anymore. Isn't it
> about time for this round to end?
> --
> Jim in NC

I believe Juan started the thread with attacks on Hitlaw, who's a good
man. Why don't you talk to Juan about having him end this thread.
Since you're all emotional about Juan getting a bad deal. Since you're
worried about the bully getting his ass beat.

I'm just here for the work and the research I gain going after the
corrupt. It's my job you see...I take pride in that. Not being afraid
to stand up to the wicked and give them a taste of their own medicine
under the terms and conditions they impose on others.

I've not attacked you yet...nor have I attacked any others. Just Juan
and his boss.

And I haven't told either of them to cease their First Amendment Rights
to Free Speech and Expression; nor you either. And won't...

Nor have I harassed any of you...and won't. Only the harasser is the
one that interests me.

Morgans[_2_]

January 18th 07, 07:19 AM

>>I believe Juan started the thread with attacks on Hitlaw, who's a good
>>man. Why don't you talk to Juan about having him end this thread.
>>Since you're all emotional about Juan getting a bad deal. Since you're
>>worried about the bully getting his ass beat.

Doesn't matter who started it, at this point. You have made your point, so
has he. I didn't ask you to stop it, or anyone else, either. I asked
nobody. I only asked if it was time for it to end.

I'm not "all emotional" about anything, either. By the way, who's the
bully, here... Seems like you have that covered. He's clearly lost, yet he
and you both continue, making no point at all. It is all pure bile.

>>I'm just here for the work and the research I gain going after the
>>corrupt. It's my job you see...I take pride in that. Not being afraid
>>to stand up to the wicked and give them a taste of their own medicine
>>under the terms and conditions they impose on others.

I'm impressed that you have stood up to him. I'm sure everyone is. Wow.
Big deal.

>>I've not attacked you yet...nor have I attacked any others. Just Juan
>>and his boss.

Once again, big deal.

>>And I haven't told either of them to cease their First Amendment Rights
>>to Free Speech and Expression; nor you either. And won't...

Nor have I.

>>Nor have I harassed any of you...and won't. Only the harasser is the
>>one that interests me.

Big deal.

I quit caring, long ago. I have not seen a word JJJuan wrote, since long
ago, except as quoted by others. I have not seen anything you wrote for the
last day or two, except as quoted by others. See any simmularity?

He lost long ago in my eyes. You have lost lately, by continuing.

I don't care if you continue. I have not asked you to stop. I, nor anyone
else should not have to. I don't care.

Is it that you have to get the last word? I now give you that opportunity;
at least for me. What you do with JJJuan is entirey up to you. YOU decide
when you have won.

RAH deserves better.
--
Jim in NC

Alphonse Le Creur.[_1_]

January 18th 07, 07:23 AM

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
:

>
> "DABEAR" > wrote in message
> oups.com...
>>
>> Montblack wrote:
>>> ("Joe Kultgen" wrote)
>>> > I'm kind of curious about one thing though. Whatever happened to
>>> > that guy
>>> > who was suing the FAA under provisions of the ADA claiming the
>>> > weight limits for ultralights discriminated against heavy people?
>>>
>>>
>>> This sound delicious...
>>>
>>> Any news out there?
>>
>> Yeah, I hear he built the World's Smallest BD-5 as revenge, but
>> revenge isn't complete until you can fit your fat a$$ into the
>> cockpit and fly the thing without crashing and burning on an El Pollo
>> Loco grill...
>
> Sorry, bubba, but I can fit into my BD-5.

Funny how you haven't got the confidence to fly it then. .

Scott[_1_]

January 18th 07, 11:49 AM

What?! Are you saying the apple doesn't fall far from the tree and that
Juan isn't setting a good example for his son? Oh, pshaw ;)

Scott

ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:

What a phony you are and I bet your son is just as bad :-)
>
> Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret
>
>>
>

ChuckSlusarczyk

January 18th 07, 01:11 PM

In article >, Scott says...
>
>What?! Are you saying the apple doesn't fall far from the tree and that
>Juan isn't setting a good example for his son? Oh, pshaw ;)
>
>Scott
>
>
>ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
>
> What a phony you are and I bet your son is just as bad :-)

No...honest...that's what I think,Oh pshaw not withstanding LOL!!! Now I'm gonna
go out on a limb and go as far as to say "like Father like son"..I know... I
know ,that's a pretty wild opinion but I said it :-)

Oh Pshaw ...I love it I haven't that for a very very long time almost made me
spew my de-caf this AM.

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret

Dan[_2_]

January 18th 07, 02:41 PM

Morgans wrote:
> "Dan" > wrote
>
>> Y'know, it's one thing to attack a person personally and another to
>> attack that person's family. I personally feel family is off limits. I
>> don't see the need to stoop to yawn's level.
>
> DABEAR has long ago gone below the levels of decency I would expect to find
> here, on his way to insulting another. It does not matter how much it is
> deserved, to me.
>
> It matters how you go about it. The pride you keep in yourself.
>
> There is no high ground anywhere around these exchanges, anymore. Isn't it
> about time for this round to end?

Agreed.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Dan[_2_]

January 18th 07, 02:44 PM

DABEAR wrote:
> Dan wrote:
>
>> Y'know, it's one thing to attack a person personally and another to
>> attack that person's family. I personally feel family is off limits. I
>> don't see the need to stoop to yawn's level.
>>
>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>
<snip>
>
> You could have spoke to Mr. Jimenez first but didn't. But that's all
> right...I like to protect my own, anyway.
>
Yes, I could have "spoke" to yawn first, but I learned long ago to
not expect better from him.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Dan[_2_]

January 18th 07, 02:49 PM

ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
> In article >, Scott says...
>> What?! Are you saying the apple doesn't fall far from the tree and that
>> Juan isn't setting a good example for his son? Oh, pshaw ;)
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>
>> ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
>>
>> What a phony you are and I bet your son is just as bad :-)
>
> No...honest...that's what I think,Oh pshaw not withstanding LOL!!! Now I'm gonna
> go out on a limb and go as far as to say "like Father like son"..I know... I
> know ,that's a pretty wild opinion but I said it :-)
>
> Oh Pshaw ...I love it I haven't that for a very very long time almost made me
> spew my de-caf this AM.
>
> Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret
>

Didn't Richard "Rick" Pshaw invent the taxi cab?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Morgans[_2_]

January 18th 07, 03:49 PM

"Dan" > wrote

> Yes, I could have "spoke" to yawn first, but I learned long ago to not
> expect better from him.

My reasoning, also.
--
Jim in NC

DABEAR

January 18th 07, 03:56 PM

Morgans wrote:

> Doesn't matter who started it, at this point.

Yeah, actually it does.

>You have made your point, so
> has he. I didn't ask you to stop it, or anyone else, either. I asked
> nobody. I only asked if it was time for it to end.

Not without taking a shot at my morality. Your moral compass has no
place on Juan's choice of battlefield. I hadn't had communications
with him in some while. He went into hiding. That's it. He invoked
my name in his fight with Hitlaw, I just learned about it, I have a
response.

If you want moral threads, take yourself out of this one and start
them. Then invite others over to your threads to discuss more
pertinent, ON TOPIC issues. Don't impose your morality on me, though.

> I'm not "all emotional" about anything, either. By the way, who's the
> bully, here... Seems like you have that covered. He's clearly lost, yet he
> and you both continue, making no point at all. It is all pure bile.

I didn't see him as losing. Especially, when he and his Master
continue their tirades for what is it now?

TWENTY years!?

> I'm impressed that you have stood up to him. I'm sure everyone is. Wow.
> Big deal.

I am not impressed with your stand in particular. Comments like "Wow.
Big deal," are clearly for those who are tired of battle. Moral is
down. But I'm not here to impress you people. I am new to Campbell's
ways, got Zoomed, and now I'm going to pound the you know what out of
him for it. I have two individuals involved in claiming they are
Journalists and committing acts involving lying to their readers, their
advertisers, about their advertisers, about other individuals who do
not deserve the good press they give them. Then, both are walking
safety hazards in regards to Aviation. And no one in the Federal
Government is doing anything about them, and in fact, are aiding and
abetting both.

These confrontations here are nothing...USENET confrontations are a
joke. It's when Juan and his Master Jim Campbell, get confronted face
to face, get confronted in the Alternative Press and the Xtreme
Alternative Press, then get confronted in Mainstream Press, along with
their supporters, which include thugs at the RARA (Reno Air Races) and
some frauds at the RRL ~ both of which have announced publicly, in the
Press, that they are working together at this time...

.... then real progress can be made getting those two clowns under
control. But the Press right now isn't involved. We've contacted the
mainstream Press in regards to some of the fraud issues your boyz Jim
and Juan are connected to. Only one response out of over sixty sent.
The Press is poised to make a bigger hero out of Jim Campbell than what
he makes out of himself.

When they do, what is your argument going to be then?

> I quit caring, long ago.

Then why are you here? Start a moral thread of your own elsewhere.
Start more than one. But if this fight is not for you, don't be here
for it. There is no shame. You quit caring and I'm sure everyone
understands why and is fine with that. You are a Godly and moral man,
of that I'm sure. But I'm not here to fight Godly and moral men. I'm
here to fight the opposite. And each man possesses his own moral
compass.

But let's not be mistaken here...there are other issues beyond the
legitimate issues posed by RAH-14 against Campbell and Jimenez. I have
my own fight with these two clowns. You indicated that DA BEAR "long
ago..." went lower than ...

This is not a RAH-14 fight anymore. There are several NEW, independent
fights underway and RAH-14 has a library of information that can prove
quite useful if presented in a Court of Law, to the new causes. I am
here doing research on behalf of those other causes. Anything I can do
to assist RAH-14 against these immoral clowns I would dearly love to.
But I'm not here to fight for RAH-14, per se ~ there's still a lot of
vigor in the original members as it is; I'm not here to impress; I'm
here to pick a fight with the Bullies that have been ailing all of you,
because they've been "out there" in the world beyond USENET, ailing
others too ~ though I dare say, these other RAH-14 cases can benefit
them, even after twenty years of fighting ~ I am here on behalf of two
other causes and am prodding and provoking Ol' Juan, and Jimbo the
Rocket Clown right behind him, into making mistakes and giving up
information, and so far, they have given up yarns.

So STUPID are these two, Juan and Jim, that I can flat out announce
this here and they will take cover for a while, stop talking, stop
fighting, hide, whatever, but I can count on them to be back. Juan is
only here because Jim can't be. Jim keeps getting his fanny waxed and
that's not good at a time when he's about to materialize as the "Hero"
he has always proclaimed himself to be. That is because, after
trampling all his victims and their rights over thirty-plus years of
time, he is now networked with RRL, RARA and the Mainstream Press, like
Boyle at MSNBC, to have any story told about him that he wants. All
are working together to protect him at this time.

A Court filing by the Spring will stop that.

I haven't been here that long. Some of the people here have been here
since this group's existence, fighting the malarkey of Jim Campbell,
and now, his Agent and Vector, Juan Jimenez. I've just joined the
fight. And I won't be quitting the fight until the July/August time
frame next year at the earliest, when I expect it will be concluded in
favor of those in the new causes poised against Campbell and more
importantly, those who aide and abet him.

The more important fight is in Court anyhow. The problem is, obtaining
the evidence and witnesses needing to take those two down for the
criminal actions and misconduct. The evidence against them all by
itself, is substantial and more than what's needed. My individual case
~ involving Federal Perjury by Mr. Campbell ~ is just icing on the cake
and is still within time limits due to New Discovery...

....that Discovery being the "thirty years of documented misconduct"
that has been in existence all along. I only discovered it recently as
the result of a lucky Google Search.

So pardon me if I have vigor in this fight that you don't. This is a
new fight now, and you don't have to be here for it. You have done
your part. You can withdraw without one ounce of shame being attached
to it. However, I can't. I am sworn to the U.S. Government to
eradicate people like Jim Campbell from Society's existence. And I
take my oath seriously.

>I have not seen a word JJJuan wrote, since long
> ago, except as quoted by others. I have not seen anything you wrote for the
> last day or two, except as quoted by others. See any simmularity?

He's still posting and will be until he's taken down. I hadn't seen
anything recently until I came across the thread the other day. He got
knocked down like you said, but opened his big mouth for something
other than food, and spat something he shouldn't have. He screwed up
in other words, because those I have been speaking with believe he
received an order to shut up in my regards and avoid confrontation with
me at all costs.

His Vanity and Ego are bigger than his a$$ might ever be, and as
someone has pointed out here, the shadow of his a$$ alone, is in excess
of the 200+ pound weight he claims describes his entire, worthless,
sagging, frame.

> He lost long ago in my eyes. You have lost lately, by continuing.

To parapharase: "Wow! Big Deal!"

I've only been in the fight just over a year against these people...and
I don't plan on staying until the second anniversary. I intend to end
their misconduct quickly. And I have just the leverage to do that.
And the abilities in a Court of Law to back it up.

> I don't care if you continue. I have not asked you to stop. I, nor anyone
> else should not have to. I don't care.

Then why the low shot directed against me? I'm not interested AT ALL
in a fight with you. No doubt in my mind you're a good man. Whatever
animousity exists between you and I over these two posts, I'd like to
end that right now. However, I am not ending my pursuit of Justice for
myself and in particular, for a man who died because Campbell revealed
himself to be a fake Journalist, sold out, and would not help that man,
who had a legitimate case against Thugs and Racketeers operating behind
Aviation as their facade. I intend to pound Campbell and Jimenez
mercilessly, and frankly, this is where the battles have been laid out
for some twenty years (more or less)...this is likely where they will
continue. There are others here interested in continuing fights on
their own or collectively, based on a different moral compass...that
which they possess, which differs from yours or mine.

However, Jimbo and Yawn fight dirty. Very dirty. Then they invoke the
High Ground Moral Clause on others, while sniveling their existence in
the muck and the mire that few care to roll up their sleeves and dive
into, because they too, like you, are good men and prefer the High
Ground, even if they lose.

Losing against these two, however, and those that aide, abet, assoicate
with, and/or support them, is not an option. There are greater issues
in Law beyond these two existing in outlying cases you know nothing
about, but that both men are connected to. THOSE are my fight and this
one is joined so I can glean information out of these two that has not
been forthcoming in the amounts that I need ~ to include offers of
witness testimony, by at least one witness who has up and disappeared
after the offer ~ that could bury Campbell in a Federal prison for the
remainder of his life and totally bring the hammer down on Jimenez'
head for his work as an accessory in Campbell's scheming.

Both men know that and both men are deathly afraid. Their valor, like
their claims, totally faux. They will melt through the floor cracks
and drip down into hell, of the Court that exist beneath the witness
stand, where they will sit and be scrutinized in examination and
cross-examination. As will their friends in RRL and RARA, among
others.

So, there are OTHER cases...be advised of that. None having anything
to do with the RAH-14 group, though the cases of RAH-14 and this new
fight against Campbell could find themselves in a win-win scenario with
cooperation. Campbell's Modus Operandi is the same...that is the
critical key to conviction.

However, without cooperation, I have to fight my way, not the way of
another man, no matter how Golden his Moral Compass is, and let me tell
you ~ and I mean this in all sincerity ~ your's shines! No doubt in
my mind you are, in your own way, correct about the Higher Ground. But
these people respect no such arguments and in fact, invoke the clause
on their victim's collective conscience, and they escape prosecution of
their crimes because of the goodness of others.

100 good cops will not stop these people. 14 Good Cops shall not stop
them. 14 Good Cops in cooperation with One bad cop shall.

> Is it that you have to get the last word? I now give you that opportunity;

Already took it. Let's you and I bury the hatchett. I have no fight
with you. I know that you are correct in your own way. However, your
ways are not my ways and that is also painfully clear.

And my philosophy is now alongside that of Emerson, who essentially
says: "I cannot care about what other people say ~ there is but what I
must do." So, unfortunately, no matter what other people say about me,
or think about me, or how they judge me in the end and for all time, I
am fighting the ruthless and must fight them more ruthlessly than
anyone could possibly envision or imagine.

I have just joined this fight. Take a breather. You don't ever have
to fight them anymore. You have done enough. Let their newer victims
take up the fight and kick their butts up between their ears.

It will be so much easier for us, the new victims, since the Old
Victims and RAH-14 have done such a decent job of tenderizing their
rumps for roasting!

>
> RAH deserves better.

That's why it's time RAH won! In Public view on the enemy's
battlefield of its own choosing. That's why I mentioned Juan having
started this. Not some childish excuse or defense, but rather, an
issue of Juan choosing the battlefield he thought he could win on. He
must be fought, and so too Campbell, on the battlefields of their
choosing, because victory in battle is based literally on the term
"High Ground." Those that have it...win. Those that don't...lose.
Those who claim it and lose...never had the High Ground in the first
place. And I have already mentioned about those two invoking the High
Ground against their victims, while wallowing in the sewage themselves.

The battle is to reclaim stolen "High Ground" and to punish those
guilty of doing the stealing and living their lives as the human
incarnation of raw sewage.

Twenty years of struggle against these two mental defects is long
enough. Time to go for the kill. The evidence against Campbell et
all, is substantial. The witnesses in testimony would be profound.
The government will have to act or lose a tremendous amount of face.

The case is a good one and well positioned against these two and
others...all someone has to do is act and you will be free of the
burden of their oppression. Twenty years lifted off the shoulders of
good people deserving justice. That is what can occur at this point in
time.

> --
> Jim in NC

I mean you no harm; I leave you particularly, in peace.

DA BEAR (a.k.a. Mark S. "Bear" Daniels)

DABEAR

January 18th 07, 04:12 PM

Dan wrote:

> Yes, I could have "spoke" to yawn first, but I learned long ago to
> not expect better from him.

Understood. However, my responde to Jim in NC will address the issue
of why I fight and on the ground of the enemy's choosing, so I'll leave
you with that. I have no fight with you and as with Jim in NC, I leave
you in peace as well, but am staying for Jimenez and Campbell. I have
work to do in regards to these two and it's dirtier than you'll ever
know and has to be to defeat their tactic of fighting dirty, then
invoking the High Ground Moral Clause on their victims. Plus, there
are other (several) cases you're unaware of not connected but
potentially benficial ~ and vice versa ~ to what RAH-14 has put
together.

All involving vast amounts of history that can take them down once and
for all time. If we get support and cooperation.

Just the same, their new misconduct has been so bad that we may take
them down anyway.

Again, I leave you in peace. I have NO fight with you. But I'm
staying for Juan and Jimbo at ANN.

My communications with you and Jim in NC are at closure.

Dan[_2_]

January 18th 07, 05:41 PM

Richard Riley wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 08:49:44 -0600, Dan > wrote:
>
>>> Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret
>>>
>> Didn't Richard "Rick" Pshaw invent the taxi cab?
>>
>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>
> Yes, but his son, GB Pshaw was a playwrite, like Pshakespeare. You
> may have seen his "Pygmalion" - which was made into the musical "Pi
> Phair Plady."

Yes, the P is silent just like the P in swimming.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Montblack

January 18th 07, 06:17 PM

("Richard Riley" wrote)
> Yes, but his son, GB Pshaw was a playwrite, like Pshakespeare. You may
> have seen his "Pygmalion" - which was made into the musical "Pi Phair
> Plady."

The rain in Spain stays mainly in the plane!
By George, she's got it! By George, she's got it!

Perhaps it rained on one of these planes:
http://www.zi.ku.dk/personal/drnash/model/spain/index.html
Great site! <click> .....The planes. The planes.

Now once again, where does it rain?
On the plane! On the plane!
And where's that blasted plane?
In Spain! In Spain!

Montblack
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pygmalion_%281938_film%29
Pygmalion (1938)

Montblack

January 18th 07, 06:31 PM

("Dan" wrote)
>> Yes, but his son, GB Pshaw was a playwrite, like Pshakespeare. You may
>> have seen his "Pygmalion" - which was made into the musical "Pi Phair
>> Plady."

> Yes, the P is silent just like the P in swimming.

Did you noticed he misspelled a word that starts with the letter "P"?

Playwright.

Montblack <p>
"Now that's some phunny stuph."

Whome?

January 18th 07, 07:45 PM

Bull****, all of it. All you are proving is that you are just as deranged as
they are.

Anyone with any sense just deletes Jaun's **** as soon as it pops up, and
waits in the hope that someone will write something constructive and on
topic, soon.

You and Jaun both just run through RAH like a 6 week old puppys, just ****ing
all overy every thread you choose to join, and to hell with someone's topic.
And as long as all you spoiled third graders continue to play here, everyone
involved will suffer.

Wake up child, if it's not about homebuilt aircraft, it doesn't belong here,
and you are the one that should find a new forum.

Dan[_2_]

January 18th 07, 09:17 PM

Montblack wrote:
> ("Dan" wrote)
>>> Yes, but his son, GB Pshaw was a playwrite, like Pshakespeare. You may
>>> have seen his "Pygmalion" - which was made into the musical "Pi Phair
>>> Plady."
>
>> Yes, the P is silent just like the P in swimming.
>
>
> Did you noticed he misspelled a word that starts with the letter "P"?
>
> Playwright.
>
>
> Montblack <p>
> "Now that's some phunny stuph."
>
>
Picky picky.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Morgans[_2_]

January 18th 07, 10:53 PM

"Whome?" > wrote

> You and Jaun both just run through RAH like a 6 week old puppys, just
> ****ing
> all overy every thread you choose to join, and to hell with someone's
> topic.
> And as long as all you spoiled third graders continue to play here,
> everyone
> involved will suffer.

I will say that I take offense at being compared to Juan in any manner, and
I believe the other long time members of this group would support that.

So, cowardice unanimous Whome, what have you done to discuss anything on
topic in this group. Anything? If so, I can't recall.

At any rate, I'll go back to ignoring you and your ilk, and to positively
contributing to the ideas and camaraderie that make this homebuilding group
a bright spot in the usenet system.
--
Jim in NC

Whome?

January 18th 07, 11:14 PM

On 1/18/2007 4:53:02 PM, "Morgans" wrote:
>
>"Whome?" > wrote
>
>> You and Jaun both just run through RAH like a 6 week old puppys, just
>> ****ing
>> all overy every thread you choose to join, and to hell with someone's
>> topic.
>> And as long as all you spoiled third graders continue to play here,
>> everyone
>> involved will suffer.
>
>I will say that I take offense at being compared to Juan in any manner, and
>I believe the other long time members of this group would support that.
>
>So, cowardice unanimous Whome, what have you done to discuss anything on
>topic in this group. Anything? If so, I can't recall.
>
>At any rate, I'll go back to ignoring you and your ilk, and to positively
>contributing to the ideas and camaraderie that make this homebuilding group
>a bright spot in the usenet system.

I wasn't talking to you.

Scott[_1_]

January 18th 07, 11:44 PM

Sorry Chuck...wouldn't want you to burn your testicles with hot java!
Wouldn't want Juan to lump you with the rest of the group who apparently
don't have balls enough to read his hero story from the Marines (I do
HAVE the balls and read it (and I did)...just didn't find the point he
wanted me to find and he gave up on me and probably just kill-filed me. ;)

Now, after that is all said and done, you weren't implying I'm old, were
you? ;)

Scott

ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:

> In article >, Scott says...
>
>>What?! Are you saying the apple doesn't fall far from the tree and that
>>Juan isn't setting a good example for his son? Oh, pshaw ;)
>>
>>Scott
>>
>>
>>ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
>>
>> What a phony you are and I bet your son is just as bad :-)
>
>
> No...honest...that's what I think,Oh pshaw not withstanding LOL!!! Now I'm gonna
> go out on a limb and go as far as to say "like Father like son"..I know... I
> know ,that's a pretty wild opinion but I said it :-)
>
> Oh Pshaw ...I love it I haven't that for a very very long time almost made me
> spew my de-caf this AM.
>
> Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret
>

Scott[_1_]

January 18th 07, 11:46 PM

Could be! Go ahead and make the claim...if Julio doesn't have to
provide facts to back up what he says, why should anyone else? (Other
than the credibility thing) ;)

Scott

Dan wrote:

> ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
>
>> In article >, Scott says...
>>
>>> What?! Are you saying the apple doesn't fall far from the tree and
>>> that Juan isn't setting a good example for his son? Oh, pshaw ;)
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>>
>>> ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
>>>
>>> What a phony you are and I bet your son is just as bad :-)
>>
>>
>> No...honest...that's what I think,Oh pshaw not withstanding LOL!!! Now
>> I'm gonna
>> go out on a limb and go as far as to say "like Father like son"..I
>> know... I
>> know ,that's a pretty wild opinion but I said it :-)
>>
>> Oh Pshaw ...I love it I haven't that for a very very long time almost
>> made me
>> spew my de-caf this AM.
>>
>> Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret
>>
>
> Didn't Richard "Rick" Pshaw invent the taxi cab?
>
> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Scott[_1_]

January 18th 07, 11:50 PM

I think that was supposed to be "swimming pool" :)

Scott

>
>
> Yes, the P is silent just like the P in swimming.
>
> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 19th 07, 01:38 PM

"BobR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
> >
>> I left Texas for something you will never understand, for the benefit of
>> my
>> son's education. :)
>>
>
> That is probably the first thing you have ever written that I could
> actually believe without some question.

No, it's not, but you're close.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 19th 07, 01:38 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>
>> I left Texas for something you will never understand, for the benefit of
>> my
>> son's education. :)
>
> Yeah, and Waco just wasn't happening for you...
>
> ...have you tried Guyana?

Nope. What's your excuse?

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 19th 07, 01:39 PM

"ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
...
> In article >, Juan Jimenez
> says...
>>
>>
> wrote in message
ups.com...
>>>
>>> For the record,it was posted on alt.politics.homosexuality on Oct
>>> 26,2006 at 11:43 am. It's in your profile so fess up why does this type
>>> of activity interest you? Come on tubby tell us.
>>
>>Politics has always interested, and so has fighting bigotry.
>
> Fighting bigotry?? LOL!! on the alt politics homosexuality group ???
> LOL!!!

Yes. I'd fight against ugliness too but you, daniels and hitlaw are a lost
cause.

Remember, it's all about the credibility you don't have, Chucksteak. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 19th 07, 01:41 PM

"Richard Riley" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:58:13 -0400, "Juan Jimenez" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Richard Riley" > wrote in message
...
>>>
>>> The big taste will be in a few years, when Juan Jr. Googles himself
>>> and finds his dad. Imagine a teenager full of rebellion hormones
>>> finding out what that dad is like outside the house.
>>
>>Hate to burst your bubble yet again boy, but my son already knows exactly
>>what I post.
>>Unlike you, I have no need to hide what I write from children,
>>mine or otherwise. <chuckle>
>
> When he gets kicked out of 7th grade for writing about his schoolmates
> and teachers on his myspace page, remember this.

LOL! 7th grade happened years ago, sonny. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 19th 07, 01:43 PM

"ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
...
> In article >, Juan Jimenez
> says...
>>
>>Is that kinda like the joys of peer pressure when beloved billionaire war
>>heros die in things you build? :)
>
> The NTSB probable cause says it all my conscience is clear .But I do feel
> bad
> it happened.
>>
>>good thing my son will never have to sue me to get paid for honest work.
>>nor
>>will he ever have to worry about child abuse. :)
>
>
> Once again I'll ask what son sued me for "honest work" Name please ,when
> etc.
> Credibility jaunita ,it's about credibility .
>
> Child abuse?? What child abuse?? Same reply what child ,when ,where?
> Credibility
> jaun ,it's about credibility and you still have none. Prove what you say
> that's
> all. What a phony you are and I bet your son is just as bad :-)

I don't have to prove it, kiddo. My son has never had to sue me to get paid
for work he does for me, and he has never been abused. If you know
otherwise, let us know.

What's the matter, Chucksteak, something ring a bell? :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 19th 07, 01:47 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> www.waterworkscase.com

Ah, a web site that reflects your penchant for hot air, all bark and no
bite. :)

> It's not about getting even...it's about exposing not one, but now two
> dangerous fakes, frauds, individuals that are dangers to themselves and
> for that matter, others.

Is that what you think you are doing, lardball? :)

> And as for "lardball," it's fun to watch that fat condom around the
> base of your pecker-head ~ you know, the one your neck is suffocating
> in ~ shimmy when you talk, Pork Rind!

What's the matter, lardball, don't like it when you're forcefed your own BS?

<mercy yap, yap, yapping snip>

You still in that motel with your mom? :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 19th 07, 01:47 PM

Nah, I just ignore them. What's your excuse? :)

"red12049" > wrote in message
...
> Do you have a problem with reverends, or other religious professionals?
>
>
> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "red12049" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Ummmm.... Yes, Juan, I am the judge of that, for me. And I can even
>>> point it out to others, so they can make their own judgements, for
>>> themselves. As can you. That is not a delusion Juan, that is life.
>>
>> That's what "reverends" do as well. Knock yourself out. :)
>>
>>
>> --
>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>
>
>

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 19th 07, 01:52 PM

"ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
...
> In article >, Juan Jimenez
> says...
>>
>>> He isn't allowed into SnF and he got in by a fluke
>>
>>A fluke indeed, right through the front door when the SNF management told
>>him he couldn't have a press pass but could buy a ticket. Riiiiight. :)
>
>
> Management said it was alright?

That's right, chucksteak. Took them half an hour to make up their mind too,
mostly because their lawyers were probably telling them it was a bad idea to
pull childish stunts in front of the general media, just like it was a very
bad idea to tell the Polk County tourism office they had a high ticket sales
number, and then tell the IRS that they had a much lower number (and it
doesn't surprise me that you stand behind people who pull fraudulent stunts
like that and then get caught). We just waited, and he was sold a ticket and
waltzed right in. :)

The pics are there on my web site. Watch and weep, just like Hitlaw.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 19th 07, 01:54 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ps.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>> Looks like someone finally dug the tub-o-lard and his mother from the
>> Colorado snow. Still living in that motel room with your ma? :)
>
> Hey Juan ~ your wife still doing that act with the Donkey in Tijuana!?
> I heard her fat ugly man was layered in all areas but two, and one of
> those areas was the feet...
>
> ...strange name for her act: "The BJ in TJ!" I wonder what that could
> mean...

Still living in the hotel with his ma. Check. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 19th 07, 02:01 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Dan wrote:
>
>> Y'know, it's one thing to attack a person personally and another to
>> attack that person's family. I personally feel family is off limits. I
>> don't see the need to stoop to yawn's level.
>>
>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>
> My job as an Alternative Journalist...

As a WHAT? LOL! Does that include being investigated by the FBI for making
threatening calls to entities that happen to be associated with ANN?

And yet.... believe me, I don't want to make a monkey out of you. Why should
I take all the credit? You're doing such a good job of it, go right ahead.
:)

<mercy snip>

<somebody bring a mop, the giant hairball foamed all over the place again>

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 19th 07, 02:12 PM

"Alphonse Le Creur." > wrote in message
.130...
>>
>> Sorry, bubba, but I can fit into my BD-5.
>
> Funny how you haven't got the confidence to fly it then. .

Funny how everyone who knows they'll never own one expresses their feelings
in terms of something they will never have a chance to do. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 19th 07, 02:13 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>> Sorry, bubba, but I can fit into my BD-5. Is there _any_ cockpit into
>> which
>> all 400+ lbs of you can be squished into?
>>
>> That also happens to explain why you can't come up with any proof of
>> aviation experience. Not only do you have none, you couldn't get any even
>> if
>> you tried, other than buying double seats on Southwest. :)
>
> Hey Porky! If you could fit that cockpit, you'd be flying! I hear you
> can't even fit Donkey Girl's cockpit...some material defect (beyond the
> mental defects) related to your tiny feet. You know, if you wouldn't
> stick them in your mouth so much, they wouldn't shrink. Same with
> another portion of your anatomy...related to your feet.
>
> Yep, get that boy a BD-5J-A380! And a "lollipop!" Preferably,
> Campbell's, so both can sleep.

No aviation experience because he's the poster boy for the Goodyear Blimp.
Check! :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 19th 07, 02:20 PM

I checked that already, Alan.

FAA REGISTRY
Name Inquiry - List Results
Total Names found for HITLAW
in the country of UNITED STATES is 0

FAA REGISTRY
Name Inquiry - List Results
Total Names found for HITLAW
in the country of INDONESIA is 0

"olympusE1" > wrote in message
oups.com...
> yes, he is. check it again, Mr. Jimenez.
>
> here's the link to the query page.
>
> https://amsrvs.registry.faa.gov/airmeninquiry/default.asp
>
> you are wrong. let's see if you are adult enough to admit it.
>
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> "olympusE1" > wrote in message
>> ups.com...
>> >
>> > ...ummm, check your facts, Mr. Jimenez, or at least do a search of the
>> > database you're quoting to ensure that what you are saying is remotely
>> > accurate. Mr. Hitlaw is indeed on the FAA database, and has current
>> > A&P and Senior Parachure Rigger (chest) certificates.
>>
>> No, he's not. There is no Hitlaw in the database, either in the US or in
>> Indonesia.
>>
>> > As for yourself, are you the Juan Jimenez with the student ticket since
>> > 2000, or the Juan Carlos Jimenez who's had a Private ticket since 1987?
>>
>> Neither. I have a private ticket, single and multiengine land, and I have
>> never been off the database. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

BobR

January 19th 07, 05:31 PM

Damn Richard, why did you have to go and explain to that "Computer Know
It All" how to do a simple search? It was so much more fun watching
him repeat the same stupid mistake over and over again while thinking
he was so smart. It does explain how he comes up with some of the crap
he does from time to time.

Richard Riley wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:20:58 -0400, "Juan Jimenez" >
> wrote:
>
> >I checked that already, Alan.
> >
> >FAA REGISTRY
> >Name Inquiry - List Results
> >Total Names found for HITLAW
> >in the country of UNITED STATES is 0
> >
> >FAA REGISTRY
> >Name Inquiry - List Results
> >Total Names found for HITLAW
> >in the country of INDONESIA is 0
>
> It's a real puzzler. I can see how that one would have stumped you.
> In the future, when you're searching a database and you don't know
> some of the search values, use a wild card or leave them blank.
>
> Enter Last Name: Hitlaw First Name: Frank (or just the initial F, no
> period)
>
> Leave the country blank. Leave all other fields blank. Anyone who
> does that and clicks |GO| comes up with the following result.
>
> (extra line breaks removed)
> ************************************************** *
> FRANK MITCHELL HITLAW
> Address
> Address is not available
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Medical
> Medical Class : Second Medical Date: 11/1991
> MUST WEAR CORRECTIVE LENSES FOR NEAR AND DISTANT VISION.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CertIficates
> 1 of 3
> 1 2 3
> DOI : 02/01/1991
> CertIficate: PRIVATE PILOT
>
> Rating(s):
>
> PRIVATE PILOT
> AIRPLANE SINGLE ENGINE LAND
>
> ************************************************** ***
> FRANK MITCHELL HITLAW
> Address
> Address is not available
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Medical
> Medical Class : Second Medical Date: 11/1991
> MUST WEAR CORRECTIVE LENSES FOR NEAR AND DISTANT VISION.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> CertIficates
> 2 of 3
> 1 2 3
> DOI : 05/29/1992
>
> CertIficate: MECHANIC
>
> Rating(s):
>
> MECHANIC
> AIRFRAME
> POWERPLANT
>
> ************************************************** *****
> FRANK MITCHELL HITLAW
> Address
> Address is not available
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Medical
> Medical Class : Second Medical Date: 11/1991
> MUST WEAR CORRECTIVE LENSES FOR NEAR AND DISTANT VISION.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CertIficates
>
> 3 of 3
> 1 2 3
>
> DOI : 03/17/1975
> CertIficate: SENIOR PARACHUTE RIGGER
>
> Rating(s):
>
> SENIOR PARACHUTE RIGGER
> CHEST
>
> Limits
> SEAL SYMBOL MIV.
> ************************************************** *****

olympusE1

January 19th 07, 06:07 PM

....if you have indeed "checked that already" then why is it that you, a
"Certified Computer Network expert" can't find it, and my 16 year old
son, along with everyone else on this newsgroup who tries, can?

I'm sorry, but I just don't believe you.

You're wrong, Mr. Jimenez, just like you were when we had the
discussion vis a vis filing for bankruptcy under Chapter 7 codes.
Hitlaw is in the database, and one can file for dissolution under
Chapter 7.

I'll spare you the <chuckles>s, the <lol>s, the <lmao>s and other
assorted snide remarks.

You are wrong. There is nothing bad about being wrong; what annoys me,
and 99.9999999 percent of the people on this newsgroup, is that you can
look at a blue sky, declare that it is pink, and then insult everyone
who has the temerity to insist that it is blue.

By the way, if you want to find Mr. Hitlaw in the database, DO NOT
input a country or a state; just his first and last name. The address,
which is not shown, is obviously in neither the US or Florida. After
you've done that, please come back online and apologize, or at the very
least, admit you were wrong.

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> I checked that already, Alan.
>
> FAA REGISTRY
> Name Inquiry - List Results
> Total Names found for HITLAW
> in the country of UNITED STATES is 0
>
> FAA REGISTRY
> Name Inquiry - List Results
> Total Names found for HITLAW
> in the country of INDONESIA is 0
>
> "olympusE1" > wrote in message
> oups.com...
> > yes, he is. check it again, Mr. Jimenez.
> >
> > here's the link to the query page.
> >
> > https://amsrvs.registry.faa.gov/airmeninquiry/default.asp
> >
> > you are wrong. let's see if you are adult enough to admit it.
> >
> >
> > Juan Jimenez wrote:
> >> "olympusE1" > wrote in message
> >> ups.com...
> >> >
> >> > ...ummm, check your facts, Mr. Jimenez, or at least do a search of the
> >> > database you're quoting to ensure that what you are saying is remotely
> >> > accurate. Mr. Hitlaw is indeed on the FAA database, and has current
> >> > A&P and Senior Parachure Rigger (chest) certificates.
> >>
> >> No, he's not. There is no Hitlaw in the database, either in the US or in
> >> Indonesia.
> >>
> >> > As for yourself, are you the Juan Jimenez with the student ticket since
> >> > 2000, or the Juan Carlos Jimenez who's had a Private ticket since 1987?
> >>
> >> Neither. I have a private ticket, single and multiengine land, and I have
> >> never been off the database. :)
>
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

DABEAR

January 19th 07, 06:23 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> As a WHAT? LOL! Does that include being investigated by the FBI for making
> threatening calls to entities that happen to be associated with ANN?

Made a copy of this one. Big mistake, Juan. Took your lying too far.
I made contact with the FBI in Denver twenty minutes ago and have the
procedure to determine if any such investigation is underway.

Your libelous allegations are denied in their entirety. Your boss
(Campbell at ANN), his bosses at the RRL and you will be held
responsible for this statement. Will take roughly two weeks to thirty
days to get the report back.

I hve made no threatening phone calls to anyone. I have not been
contacted by the FBI regarding any such allegations ever.

If such charges have been filed, it might be just enough to get you off
the hook, but whoever filed the charges filed false charges and then it
becomes a matter of lying to the FBI and possibly Federal Perjury after
that. Your boss is good for Federal Perjury...he's caught as it
is...I'd love to see more charges added. I'll have to wait a month to
find out, but I will find out.

If anyone else has been falsely charged by Juan with being investigated
by the FBI, just contact me at:

which will show as:

bearz (three times) @

yahoo.com

I have the procedure written down verbatim from the Denver FBI. The
report can be easily obtained through the Criminal Justice Information
Services of the FBI.

DABEAR

January 19th 07, 06:25 PM

BobR

January 19th 07, 08:12 PM

After
> you've done that, please come back online and apologize, or at the very
> least, admit you were wrong.
>

You have got to be kidding. That is something that Jaun and his idol
Zoom have never done.

olympusE1 wrote:
> ...if you have indeed "checked that already" then why is it that you, a
> "Certified Computer Network expert" can't find it, and my 16 year old
> son, along with everyone else on this newsgroup who tries, can?
>
> I'm sorry, but I just don't believe you.
>
> You're wrong, Mr. Jimenez, just like you were when we had the
> discussion vis a vis filing for bankruptcy under Chapter 7 codes.
> Hitlaw is in the database, and one can file for dissolution under
> Chapter 7.
>
> I'll spare you the <chuckles>s, the <lol>s, the <lmao>s and other
> assorted snide remarks.
>
> You are wrong. There is nothing bad about being wrong; what annoys me,
> and 99.9999999 percent of the people on this newsgroup, is that you can
> look at a blue sky, declare that it is pink, and then insult everyone
> who has the temerity to insist that it is blue.
>
> By the way, if you want to find Mr. Hitlaw in the database, DO NOT
> input a country or a state; just his first and last name. The address,
> which is not shown, is obviously in neither the US or Florida. After
> you've done that, please come back online and apologize, or at the very
> least, admit you were wrong.
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
> > I checked that already, Alan.
> >
> > FAA REGISTRY
> > Name Inquiry - List Results
> > Total Names found for HITLAW
> > in the country of UNITED STATES is 0
> >
> > FAA REGISTRY
> > Name Inquiry - List Results
> > Total Names found for HITLAW
> > in the country of INDONESIA is 0
> >
> > "olympusE1" > wrote in message
> > oups.com...
> > > yes, he is. check it again, Mr. Jimenez.
> > >
> > > here's the link to the query page.
> > >
> > > https://amsrvs.registry.faa.gov/airmeninquiry/default.asp
> > >
> > > you are wrong. let's see if you are adult enough to admit it.
> > >
> > >
> > > Juan Jimenez wrote:
> > >> "olympusE1" > wrote in message
> > >> ups.com...
> > >> >
> > >> > ...ummm, check your facts, Mr. Jimenez, or at least do a search of the
> > >> > database you're quoting to ensure that what you are saying is remotely
> > >> > accurate. Mr. Hitlaw is indeed on the FAA database, and has current
> > >> > A&P and Senior Parachure Rigger (chest) certificates.
> > >>
> > >> No, he's not. There is no Hitlaw in the database, either in the US or in
> > >> Indonesia.
> > >>
> > >> > As for yourself, are you the Juan Jimenez with the student ticket since
> > >> > 2000, or the Juan Carlos Jimenez who's had a Private ticket since 1987?
> > >>
> > >> Neither. I have a private ticket, single and multiengine land, and I have
> > >> never been off the database. :)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

olympusE1

January 19th 07, 08:46 PM

....hope springs eternal. besides it's one way he can look ridiculous
without saying a single word... and that is, after all, the point of
the exercise, is it not?

BobR wrote:
> After
> > you've done that, please come back online and apologize, or at the very
> > least, admit you were wrong.
> >
>
> You have got to be kidding. That is something that Jaun and his idol
> Zoom have never done.
>
>
> olympusE1 wrote:
> > ...if you have indeed "checked that already" then why is it that you, a
> > "Certified Computer Network expert" can't find it, and my 16 year old
> > son, along with everyone else on this newsgroup who tries, can?
> >
> > I'm sorry, but I just don't believe you.
> >
> > You're wrong, Mr. Jimenez, just like you were when we had the
> > discussion vis a vis filing for bankruptcy under Chapter 7 codes.
> > Hitlaw is in the database, and one can file for dissolution under
> > Chapter 7.
> >
> > I'll spare you the <chuckles>s, the <lol>s, the <lmao>s and other
> > assorted snide remarks.
> >
> > You are wrong. There is nothing bad about being wrong; what annoys me,
> > and 99.9999999 percent of the people on this newsgroup, is that you can
> > look at a blue sky, declare that it is pink, and then insult everyone
> > who has the temerity to insist that it is blue.
> >
> > By the way, if you want to find Mr. Hitlaw in the database, DO NOT
> > input a country or a state; just his first and last name. The address,
> > which is not shown, is obviously in neither the US or Florida. After
> > you've done that, please come back online and apologize, or at the very
> > least, admit you were wrong.
> >
> > Juan Jimenez wrote:
> > > I checked that already, Alan.
> > >
> > > FAA REGISTRY
> > > Name Inquiry - List Results
> > > Total Names found for HITLAW
> > > in the country of UNITED STATES is 0
> > >
> > > FAA REGISTRY
> > > Name Inquiry - List Results
> > > Total Names found for HITLAW
> > > in the country of INDONESIA is 0
> > >
> > > "olympusE1" > wrote in message
> > > oups.com...
> > > > yes, he is. check it again, Mr. Jimenez.
> > > >
> > > > here's the link to the query page.
> > > >
> > > > https://amsrvs.registry.faa.gov/airmeninquiry/default.asp
> > > >
> > > > you are wrong. let's see if you are adult enough to admit it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Juan Jimenez wrote:
> > > >> "olympusE1" > wrote in message
> > > >> ups.com...
> > > >> >
> > > >> > ...ummm, check your facts, Mr. Jimenez, or at least do a search of the
> > > >> > database you're quoting to ensure that what you are saying is remotely
> > > >> > accurate. Mr. Hitlaw is indeed on the FAA database, and has current
> > > >> > A&P and Senior Parachure Rigger (chest) certificates.
> > > >>
> > > >> No, he's not. There is no Hitlaw in the database, either in the US or in
> > > >> Indonesia.
> > > >>
> > > >> > As for yourself, are you the Juan Jimenez with the student ticket since
> > > >> > 2000, or the Juan Carlos Jimenez who's had a Private ticket since 1987?
> > > >>
> > > >> Neither. I have a private ticket, single and multiengine land, and I have
> > > >> never been off the database. :)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

red12049

January 19th 07, 10:37 PM

My excuse for what, Juan?

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
...
> Nah, I just ignore them. What's your excuse? :)
>
> "red12049" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Do you have a problem with reverends, or other religious professionals?
>>
>>
>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "red12049" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Ummmm.... Yes, Juan, I am the judge of that, for me. And I can even
>>>> point it out to others, so they can make their own judgements, for
>>>> themselves. As can you. That is not a delusion Juan, that is life.
>>>
>>> That's what "reverends" do as well. Knock yourself out. :)
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>

Scott[_1_]

January 19th 07, 11:02 PM

Well, try it AGAIN, dude. http://www.faa.gov or try starting here:
https://amsrvs.registry.faa.gov/airmeninquiry/default.asp

You must enter info about YOURSELF first before it will let you search
for certificates. Maybe that's why it didn't work, either you don't
exist or you lied about YOUR information as you enetered it.

I found 3 certificates for a Frank Mitchell Hitlaw (on my first try).

Copied here so you don't keep telling ME to prove it:

FRANK MITCHELL HITLAW

Address

Address is not available

Medical

Medical Class : Second Medical Date: 11/1991

# MUST WEAR CORRECTIVE LENSES FOR NEAR AND DISTANT VISION.

CertIficates
1 of 3

DOI : 02/01/1991
CertIficate: PRIVATE PILOT
Rating(s):

PRIVATE PILOT
AIRPLANE SINGLE ENGINE LAND

-----------------------------------------------------------

CertIficates
2 of 3

DOI : 05/29/1992
CertIficate: MECHANIC
Rating(s):

MECHANIC
AIRFRAME
POWERPLANT

------------------------------------------------------------

CertIficates
3 of 3

DOI : 03/17/1975
CertIficate: SENIOR PARACHUTE RIGGER
Rating(s):

SENIOR PARACHUTE RIGGER
CHEST

Must have been a slipslod attempt on your part if you couldn't find the
above info...

Scott

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> I checked that already, Alan.

Scott[_1_]

January 19th 07, 11:05 PM

Rrrriiiiiight...can't wait to see THAT one! ;)

Scott

olympusE1 wrote:

After
> you've done that, please come back online and apologize, or at the very
> least, admit you were wrong.
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>>I checked that already, Alan.
>>
>>FAA REGISTRY
>>Name Inquiry - List Results
>>Total Names found for HITLAW
>>in the country of UNITED STATES is 0
>>
>>FAA REGISTRY
>>Name Inquiry - List Results
>>Total Names found for HITLAW
>>in the country of INDONESIA is 0

wmbjk

January 19th 07, 11:39 PM

On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:16:47 -0800, Richard Riley
> wrote:

>On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:20:58 -0400, "Juan Jimenez" >
>wrote:
>
>>I checked that already, Alan.
>>
>>FAA REGISTRY
>>Name Inquiry - List Results
>>Total Names found for HITLAW
>>in the country of UNITED STATES is 0
>>
>>FAA REGISTRY
>>Name Inquiry - List Results
>>Total Names found for HITLAW
>>in the country of INDONESIA is 0
>
>It's a real puzzler. I can see how that one would have stumped you.
>In the future, when you're searching a database and you don't know
>some of the search values, use a wild card or leave them blank.
>
>Enter Last Name: Hitlaw First Name: Frank (or just the initial F, no
>period)
>
>Leave the country blank. Leave all other fields blank. Anyone who
>does that and clicks |GO| comes up with the following result.
>
>(extra line breaks removed)
>************************************************** *
>FRANK MITCHELL HITLAW
>Address
>Address is not available
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Medical
>Medical Class : Second Medical Date: 11/1991
>MUST WEAR CORRECTIVE LENSES FOR NEAR AND DISTANT VISION.

<snipped>

I predict that Juan will now issue a sincere and heartfelt apology.
Then Dick Cheney will don a tie-dyed T-shirt and chain himself to a
redwood, and Moller will pilot the Skycar to the moon.

Wayne

[email protected]

January 20th 07, 01:00 AM

wmbjk wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:16:47 -0800, Richard Riley
> > wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:20:58 -0400, "Juan Jimenez" >
> >wrote:
> >
> >>I checked that already, Alan.
> >>
> >>FAA REGISTRY
> >>Name Inquiry - List Results
> >>Total Names found for HITLAW
> >>in the country of UNITED STATES is 0
> >>
> >>FAA REGISTRY
> >>Name Inquiry - List Results
> >>Total Names found for HITLAW
> >>in the country of INDONESIA is 0
> >
> >It's a real puzzler. I can see how that one would have stumped you.
> >In the future, when you're searching a database and you don't know
> >some of the search values, use a wild card or leave them blank.
> >
> >Enter Last Name: Hitlaw First Name: Frank (or just the initial F, no
> >period)
> >
> >Leave the country blank. Leave all other fields blank. Anyone who
> >does that and clicks |GO| comes up with the following result.
> >
> >(extra line breaks removed)
> >************************************************** *
> >FRANK MITCHELL HITLAW
> >Address
> >Address is not available
> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >Medical
> >Medical Class : Second Medical Date: 11/1991
> >MUST WEAR CORRECTIVE LENSES FOR NEAR AND DISTANT VISION.
>
> <snipped>
>
> I predict that Juan will now issue a sincere and heartfelt apology.
> Then Dick Cheney will don a tie-dyed T-shirt and chain himself to a
> redwood, and Moller will pilot the Skycar to the moon.
>
> Wayne

For what its worth my home of record when I am overseas is here in
Florida. Makes it easier to keep my bills paid and a place for my
magazines to collect.

Here is the part that will confuse chubby, If a plane is registered
with a PK prefix for Indonesia your US A&P is not valid to sign
anything off. You are required to have a DGAC issued Certificate of
Maintenance Approval(COMA) I was issued COMA 0196 in Dec 2002. It was
for B747-100 through 400 series airframe and engines and the 727-200
and JT8D engines. I never checked the Indonesian DGACs data base to see
if I was in it. I would probably bet against it because of some of the
things I know about how the DGAC operates.In their main office there is
a large bullpen for the inspectors maybe a 100 or more cubicles and
just two computer terminals. A unique thing over there is all
maintenance licensing is by specific type. It is also required that you
have a formal schooling on each item airframe or engine. You can have
25 years documented experience but no formal school no deal.

When we first arrived we were issued IDs from Indonesian Airlines,
everyone was listed as a captain. Didn't make any difference
mechanic,pilot or office help we were all listed as Captains.

Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring

BobR

January 20th 07, 03:02 AM

Yeah, but in this case Jaun is no baby even if he does act like one
most of the time.

Richard Riley wrote:
> On 19 Jan 2007 09:31:02 -0800, "BobR" >
> wrote:
>
> >Damn Richard, why did you have to go and explain to that "Computer Know
> >It All" how to do a simple search? It was so much more fun watching
> >him repeat the same stupid mistake over and over again while thinking
> >he was so smart. It does explain how he comes up with some of the crap
> >he does from time to time.
> >
>
> I'm afraid age and parenthood has made me soft.
>
> When a baby taking his first steps falls and you don't catch him the
> first time, that's just the way it is, you can't hover over him. If
> you don't catch him the second time, you know it's part of the
> learning process.
>
> But if you don't catch him the third time, you're just being mean.

Dan[_2_]

January 20th 07, 03:29 AM

DABEAR wrote:
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>> As a WHAT? LOL! Does that include being investigated by the FBI for making
>> threatening calls to entities that happen to be associated with ANN?
>
>
> Made a copy of this one. Big mistake, Juan. Took your lying too far.
> I made contact with the FBI in Denver twenty minutes ago and have the
> procedure to determine if any such investigation is underway.
>
> Your libelous allegations are denied in their entirety.

To prove libel damages do you not have to prove injury? How were you
injured by the rants of yawn on RAH?

I'm not a lawyer, but I saw one on TV. As much as I'd like to see
yawn receive some wall to wall counsellings if I sat on your jury I'd
vote against you based on what has been presented here thus far.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Morgans[_6_]

January 20th 07, 03:42 AM

"Whome?" > wrote

> I wasn't talking to you.

Good.

See how I did that? I included the name of the last person in the
conversation that I was replying to.

It is clear who the reply is talking to, when replying in this manner.

You should try it.
--
Jim in NC

Mark Hickey

January 20th 07, 03:49 AM

"olympusE1" > wrote:

>By the way, if you want to find Mr. Hitlaw in the database, DO NOT
>input a country or a state; just his first and last name. The address,
>which is not shown, is obviously in neither the US or Florida. After
>you've done that, please come back online and apologize, or at the very
>least, admit you were wrong.

When that happens, you're going to have to install transponders on
pigs so you can track 'em in the pattern as they fly around. Juan's
gone well out of his way to make sure that it's absolutely clear that
he is free from social responsibility, manners, conscience or tact. I
for one believe him on those points.

Mark "flying pork alert" Hickey

BobR

January 20th 07, 03:54 AM

You are not a lawyer but you must have stayed at a Holiday Inn Express
last night. <BG>

Dan wrote:
> DABEAR wrote:
> > Juan Jimenez wrote:
> >
> >> As a WHAT? LOL! Does that include being investigated by the FBI for making
> >> threatening calls to entities that happen to be associated with ANN?
> >
> >
> > Made a copy of this one. Big mistake, Juan. Took your lying too far.
> > I made contact with the FBI in Denver twenty minutes ago and have the
> > procedure to determine if any such investigation is underway.
> >
> > Your libelous allegations are denied in their entirety.
>
> To prove libel damages do you not have to prove injury? How were you
> injured by the rants of yawn on RAH?
>
> I'm not a lawyer, but I saw one on TV. As much as I'd like to see
> yawn receive some wall to wall counsellings if I sat on your jury I'd
> vote against you based on what has been presented here thus far.
>
> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Whome?

January 20th 07, 05:10 AM

Jim,

If your news reader doesn't afford you the ability to tell who is, or who is
not, posting under one of your messages, then maybe "you should try" a more
functional news reader.

DABEAR

January 20th 07, 05:54 AM

Dan wrote:

> To prove libel damages do you not have to prove injury? How were you
> injured by the rants of yawn on RAH?
>
> I'm not a lawyer, but I saw one on TV. As much as I'd like to see
> yawn receive some wall to wall counsellings if I sat on your jury I'd
> vote against you based on what has been presented here thus far.

And as I stated before, there are other cases beyond RAH-14. At least
four cases. All the cases involve fraud. The majority of the cases
involve fraud against the Government and the People. There are three
private party cases beyond those, which are rapidly expanding, and
three cases involving Veteran's issues.

There are other people beyond Juan. Juan is just a sockpuppet. He
ain't about nuthin'...but those using him and manipulating him as a
front man are.

It's very simple: Anything that falsely, wrongly damages credibility
and/or reputation, injures. Keywords:

"Falsely, Wrongly," as in with "intent" and/or "criminal intent."

More important: Juan claims to be a Journalist and lies. Same as his
boss, Campbell. Those acts affect all Journalism. And injure
reputable Journalists. That is more important than his nonsensical
libel, IF he has libeled. His information could come from a secondary
or third party source. In that event, he might believe what he said is
true. If true, then someone has filed false charges. If not true,
then Juan's left hanging in the wind except that, two of his Masters
are responsible for his actions. Unless they admit they told Juan
wrongly. That lets him off the hook because he believed it to be true.
The others can potentially incur liability, whether he believes what
they said, whether their statements are true, or not..

Key to finding out if Juan has just made a tactical error and exposed
his Masters' misdeeds with the FBI, is merely to file an inquiry with
the FBI, provide proof of ID, a fingerprint card, and a request for any
information about investigations in progress. Rule of thumb: if the
FBI have not contacted you first, then you're not being investigated.

I have had no contacts from the FBI regarding charges against me and
two with the FBI this week in regards to cases I have against others.
There are more contacts to come from me to them. None that I know of
from them to me, but I'm not going to wait to find out, because the
charges are false.

It's hilarious, but I hate telephones and I hardly use them. They're a
nuissance in my book. So why would I call my enemies on one, threaten,
and run the risk of being recorded by anyone, let alone, Law
Enforcement?

Anything I have to say I say in my Press or in Court OR (preferred) to
their worthless faces.

You do not have all the facts. You do not know the cases. You are not
on the jury. We are not on TV. You have not been injured by Campbell,
is my understanding from a third party source. My people and I have
been.

Malicously.

Now, as I stated before, I do not wish a fight with you. I'm here for
Juan and his Masters. My cases involve them, not you. My
communications with you are at closure. I will not be responding to
any further or your posts. If you wish, my contact information is
listed in a previous post. Contact me privately for more information.
That I'm all right with.

Drew Dalgleish

January 20th 07, 06:02 AM

On 19 Jan 2007 10:07:46 -0800, "olympusE1" >
wrote:

>...if you have indeed "checked that already" then why is it that you, a
>"Certified Computer Network expert" can't find it, and my 16 year old
>son, along with everyone else on this newsgroup who tries, can?
>
>I'm sorry, but I just don't believe you.
>
>You're wrong, Mr. Jimenez, just like you were when we had the
>discussion vis a vis filing for bankruptcy under Chapter 7 codes.
>Hitlaw is in the database, and one can file for dissolution under
>Chapter 7.
>
>I'll spare you the <chuckles>s, the <lol>s, the <lmao>s and other
>assorted snide remarks.
>
You forgot the mercy snips everytime someone else speaks the truth.

>You are wrong. There is nothing bad about being wrong; what annoys me,
>and 99.9999999 percent of the people on this newsgroup, is that you can
>look at a blue sky, declare that it is pink, and then insult everyone
>who has the temerity to insist that it is blue.
>
>By the way, if you want to find Mr. Hitlaw in the database, DO NOT
>input a country or a state; just his first and last name. The address,
>which is not shown, is obviously in neither the US or Florida. After
>you've done that, please come back online and apologize, or at the very
>least, admit you were wrong.
>
>Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> I checked that already, Alan.
>>
>> FAA REGISTRY
>> Name Inquiry - List Results
>> Total Names found for HITLAW
>> in the country of UNITED STATES is 0
>>
>> FAA REGISTRY
>> Name Inquiry - List Results
>> Total Names found for HITLAW
>> in the country of INDONESIA is 0
>>
>> "olympusE1" > wrote in message
>> oups.com...
>> > yes, he is. check it again, Mr. Jimenez.
>> >
>> > here's the link to the query page.
>> >
>> > https://amsrvs.registry.faa.gov/airmeninquiry/default.asp
>> >
>> > you are wrong. let's see if you are adult enough to admit it.
>> >
>> >
>> > Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> >> "olympusE1" > wrote in message
>> >> ups.com...
>> >> >
>> >> > ...ummm, check your facts, Mr. Jimenez, or at least do a search of the
>> >> > database you're quoting to ensure that what you are saying is remotely
>> >> > accurate. Mr. Hitlaw is indeed on the FAA database, and has current
>> >> > A&P and Senior Parachure Rigger (chest) certificates.
>> >>
>> >> No, he's not. There is no Hitlaw in the database, either in the US or in
>> >> Indonesia.
>> >>
>> >> > As for yourself, are you the Juan Jimenez with the student ticket since
>> >> > 2000, or the Juan Carlos Jimenez who's had a Private ticket since 1987?
>> >>
>> >> Neither. I have a private ticket, single and multiengine land, and I have
>> >> never been off the database. :)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>

Whome?

January 20th 07, 08:32 AM

Then how did you respond to DABEARs message on the 1/17 in less than 20
minutes. I might have been born in the morning, but it wasn't yesterday
morning. Go bull**** someone else.

Dan[_2_]

January 20th 07, 12:48 PM

BobR wrote:
> You are not a lawyer but you must have stayed at a Holiday Inn Express
> last night. <BG>
>
> Dan wrote:
>> DABEAR wrote:
>>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>>
>>>> As a WHAT? LOL! Does that include being investigated by the FBI for making
>>>> threatening calls to entities that happen to be associated with ANN?
>>>
>>> Made a copy of this one. Big mistake, Juan. Took your lying too far.
>>> I made contact with the FBI in Denver twenty minutes ago and have the
>>> procedure to determine if any such investigation is underway.
>>>
>>> Your libelous allegations are denied in their entirety.
>> To prove libel damages do you not have to prove injury? How were you
>> injured by the rants of yawn on RAH?
>>
>> I'm not a lawyer, but I saw one on TV. As much as I'd like to see
>> yawn receive some wall to wall counsellings if I sat on your jury I'd
>> vote against you based on what has been presented here thus far.
>>
>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>

You peeked?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Robert Bonomi

January 20th 07, 06:47 PM

In article >, Dan > wrote:
>DABEAR wrote:
>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>
>>> As a WHAT? LOL! Does that include being investigated by the FBI for making
>>> threatening calls to entities that happen to be associated with ANN?
>>
>>
>> Made a copy of this one. Big mistake, Juan. Took your lying too far.
>> I made contact with the FBI in Denver twenty minutes ago and have the
>> procedure to determine if any such investigation is underway.
>>
>> Your libelous allegations are denied in their entirety.
>
> To prove libel damages do you not have to prove injury?

In point of legal fact, "No."

> How were you
>injured by the rants of yawn on RAH?

There are three separate lines of reasoning to support a defamation claim:
1) the hypothetical 'reasonable person', would give credence to the
utterances, and you would suffer (and probably have suffered) harm
thereby.
2) "actual" harm can be shown. e.g. somebody told you they wouldn't do
business because of what 'so-and-so said'.
3) Certain types of assertations that are considered to be 'automatically'
defamatory, unless one is in possession of ironclad proof of the truth
thereof. This is a special situation, known as "Libel per se". One
example is that of stating that a _married_ woman is "unfaithful".

"Type 3" claims _rarely_ go to trial -- defendant's lawyer advises that
defendant does not have a possible defense, and urges settlement. On the
rare case where it does go to trial, essentially the only issue is 'how
much' plaintiff is going to get.

'Type 2' claims are comparatively *uncommon*. Finding the party who will
testify that they believed, _and_acted_upon_, the defamation is very
difficult.

The majority of actual defamation actions are based on something that
was said publicly, in a manner/forum such that it is deemed reasonably
believable. "Background of", and "familiarity with" the parties making
the statements and/or those named therein, is -not- a prerequisite for
evaluation of the 'believability' of the statement.

Additional note: yawn's habit of 'posing the matter as a question', with
an 'ill-defined referent' does *not* evade liability. He can claim till
he's blue in the face that he "wasn't referring to "any actions involving
so-and-so" with that 'question' -- but it is a matter of what the 'reasonable
man' would believe he meant, not what he -says- he meant.

Yawn _has_ 'crossed the line' of actionable defamation in his postings to
this newsgroup, *many* times.

He does it, because he believes he can 'get away with it', since his victims
don't have the 'spare resources' to haul him into court -- and he's close
enough to "judgement proof" that no attorney would take a case on contingency
basis.

> I'm not a lawyer, but I saw one on TV. As much as I'd like to see
>yawn receive some wall to wall counsellings if I sat on your jury I'd
>vote against you based on what has been presented here thus far.

Based on _that_, you wouldn't get on the jury in the first place. :)
You've already decided you know what the law is, without listening to
the judge's instructions.

Morgans[_6_]

January 20th 07, 07:59 PM

"Whome?" > wrote in message
...
> Jim,
>
> If your news reader doesn't afford you the ability to tell who is, or who
> is
> not, posting under one of your messages, then maybe "you should try" a
> more
> functional news reader.

It works just fine, until I delete a person from the right to appear on my
machine.

Why can't you just follow a very simple newsgroup convention, and quote the
person you are replying to, in part at least?

I know the answer. Not my problem, microsoft sucks, ... yada, yada, yada.

Oh, by the way, you just lost the right to appear on my machine.

Plonk
--
Jim in NC

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 20th 07, 09:05 PM

For trying to transpose your own problems to others, and on the basis of
"religion" at that. :)

"red12049" > wrote in message
...
> My excuse for what, Juan?
>
> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Nah, I just ignore them. What's your excuse? :)
>>
>> "red12049" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Do you have a problem with reverends, or other religious professionals?
>>>
>>>
>>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> "red12049" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> Ummmm.... Yes, Juan, I am the judge of that, for me. And I can even
>>>>> point it out to others, so they can make their own judgements, for
>>>>> themselves. As can you. That is not a delusion Juan, that is life.
>>>>
>>>> That's what "reverends" do as well. Knock yourself out. :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>
>
>

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 20th 07, 09:06 PM

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>> As a WHAT? LOL! Does that include being investigated by the FBI for
>> making
>> threatening calls to entities that happen to be associated with ANN?
>
>
> Made a copy of this one. Big mistake, Juan.

When it comes to you, Daniels, the only mistake anyone can make is not
locking the refrigerator.

Trust me on this one, putz, your verbal diahrreas mean nothing to me. :)

<mercy snip>

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 20th 07, 09:07 PM

"BobR" > wrote in message
ps.com...
> Damn Richard, why did you have to go and explain to that "Computer Know
> It All" how to do a simple search? It was so much more fun watching
> him repeat the same stupid mistake over and over again while thinking
> he was so smart. It does explain how he comes up with some of the crap
> he does from time to time.

First it was crapola, now it's down to crap, what's next, Bob? :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 20th 07, 09:12 PM

"Richard Riley" > wrote in message
...
>
> It's a real puzzler. I can see how that one would have stumped you.
> In the future, when you're searching a database and you don't know
> some of the search values, use a wild card or leave them blank.

That's exactly what I did.

The question remains, is this the same Frank Hitlaw? Director of Maintenace
at Far 129 airlines less than 10 years since he got his A&P ticket? Sorry,
but I don't buy it. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 20th 07, 09:14 PM

"olympusE1" > wrote in message
ps.com...
> ...if you have indeed "checked that already" then why is it that you, a
> "Certified Computer Network expert"

You must be thinking of the wrong person, or else you're making the common
mistake of parroting what other RAH gagglers say, Alan. Bad idea.

> I'm sorry, but I just don't believe you.

Well, then you're making yet another common mistakes, that of thinking I
care. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 20th 07, 09:16 PM

"Mark Hickey" > wrote in message
...
>
> When that happens, you're going to have to install transponders on
> pigs so you can track 'em in the pattern as they fly around. Juan's
> gone well out of his way to make sure that it's absolutely clear that
> he is free from social responsibility, manners, conscience or tact. I
> for one believe him on those points.

In other words, feeding the RAH gaggle the same thing it dishes out. Can't
handle it? Get out of the kitchen. :)

You can ask for something you're not willing to give. Ask ChuckSteak about
that, he knows exactly what I am talking about. So does Hitlaw. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Dan[_2_]

January 20th 07, 09:19 PM

Robert Bonomi wrote:
> In article >, Dan > wrote:
<snip>
>
>> I'm not a lawyer, but I saw one on TV. As much as I'd like to see
>> yawn receive some wall to wall counsellings if I sat on your jury I'd
>> vote against you based on what has been presented here thus far.
>
> Based on _that_, you wouldn't get on the jury in the first place. :)
> You've already decided you know what the law is, without listening to
> the judge's instructions.
>
>
Two procedural points: you assume facts not in evidence in that I
have not received judge's instructions as yet and, law or not, several
people have said just as "libelous" things as yawn is accused of.
Example: the donkey act comment. My decision would be based on the
"clean hands" concept. To me this means don't come to me to side with
you when you have done the same.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

red12049[_1_]

January 20th 07, 10:36 PM

Juan,

Please read back your own posts. You brought up "Reverends", not I. I
simply asked, since you brought them up, if you had a problem with them
also.

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
.. .
> For trying to transpose your own problems to others, and on the basis of
> "religion" at that. :)
>
> "red12049" > wrote in message
> ...
>> My excuse for what, Juan?
>>
>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Nah, I just ignore them. What's your excuse? :)
>>>
>>> "red12049" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Do you have a problem with reverends, or other religious professionals?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> "red12049" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> Ummmm.... Yes, Juan, I am the judge of that, for me. And I can even
>>>>>> point it out to others, so they can make their own judgements, for
>>>>>> themselves. As can you. That is not a delusion Juan, that is life.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's what "reverends" do as well. Knock yourself out. :)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>

red12049[_1_]

January 20th 07, 10:39 PM

No Juan, that ISN'T the question. Please keep your own statements
straight... YOU said you could not find Mr. Hitlaw in the database, not that
the one that turned up wasn't the same.

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
.. .
>
> "Richard Riley" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> It's a real puzzler. I can see how that one would have stumped you.
>> In the future, when you're searching a database and you don't know
>> some of the search values, use a wild card or leave them blank.
>
> That's exactly what I did.
>
> The question remains, is this the same Frank Hitlaw? Director of
> Maintenace at Far 129 airlines less than 10 years since he got his A&P
> ticket? Sorry, but I don't buy it. :)
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>

ChuckSlusaczyk

January 20th 07, 10:54 PM

In article >, Juan Jimenez says...
>In other words, feeding the RAH gaggle the same thing it dishes out. Can't
>handle it? Get out of the kitchen. :)
>
>You can ask for something you're not willing to give. Ask ChuckSteak about
>that, he knows exactly what I am talking about. So does Hitlaw. :)

And just exactly is what? All I know is you lied about Frank and his credentials
..Does Pink Elephant know just how bad a computer operator you are? and you
teach?? Can't even find correct info on the net that a 16 yr old could find. Not
much of a journalist either .Phony and no credibility .way to go jaun ya liar.

Chuck S

BobR

January 21st 07, 01:16 AM

Standard Zoom and Jaun technique...when the FACTS are presented and
they don't support their lie, either deny the facts, deny they said
that, or change the argument. In this case, its all three. At least
one of Jaun's statements were true...HE COULDN'T FIND Hitlaw in the
database. That fact shouldn't be a surprise for anyone here.

red12049 wrote:
> No Juan, that ISN'T the question. Please keep your own statements
> straight... YOU said you could not find Mr. Hitlaw in the database, not that
> the one that turned up wasn't the same.
>
> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
> .. .
> >
> > "Richard Riley" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >>
> >> It's a real puzzler. I can see how that one would have stumped you.
> >> In the future, when you're searching a database and you don't know
> >> some of the search values, use a wild card or leave them blank.
> >
> > That's exactly what I did.
> >
> > The question remains, is this the same Frank Hitlaw? Director of
> > Maintenace at Far 129 airlines less than 10 years since he got his A&P
> > ticket? Sorry, but I don't buy it. :)
> >
> >
> > --
> > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
> >

olympusE1

January 21st 07, 01:45 AM

....oh I don't think you care, Mr. Jimenez... my threshold for
self-delusion is far below yours. You obviously don't care about
anyone or anything, other than the sound of your own voice and the
clacking of your keyboard. What I do think is that you're neither man
enough nor mature enough, despite your advancing years, to admit when
you're wrong; your latest retort is yet another descent into nonsense
where you babble on about how the name in the FAA database must be
"some other Frank Hitlaw." Your insatiable need to annoy people is
beyond belief, and THAT, Mr. Jimenez is what I define as a bad idea.
What you think of that definition is, in itself, the definition of
irrelevance, but I will tell you this: One day you're going to annoy
the wrong person despite your "yo soy mas macho" nonsense here. Having
been within arms length of you on three occasions in the past 18
months, I can attest to this:

And as for "Certified Computer Network Expert" I got that from YOUR BD5
website. You've spent "320 hours of study and 800 pages of reading" to
have achieved the certification from the firm for which you now lecture
under contract according to your website. (While I know that your
quotation of those figures is meant to impress, in my case you're
talking/typing to someone who goes through a couple thousand pages of
manuals every time the rat *******s at Adobe come out with another
version of Photoshop. My "certificates" for wading through those
tomes, though, have "pay to the order of" on them, and that's just fine
and dandy with me. Too, I know for a fact that at least one of the
people you regularly belittle here has a pair of postgraduate degrees
from a university that the pink elephants mention attending in THEIR
bios...)

So there you go, Mr. Jimenez: We have to agree to disagree. It is my
opinion that you are a rude, petulant, self-centered and self-absorbed
overweight child, and I imagine that you would disagree with that
opinion.

With that, plonk!

Off you and your opinions, and your excuses, and your snide remarks,
and most especially your childish emoticons go into the trash bin.

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> "olympusE1" > wrote in message
> ps.com...
> > ...if you have indeed "checked that already" then why is it that you, a
> > "Certified Computer Network expert"
>
> You must be thinking of the wrong person, or else you're making the common
> mistake of parroting what other RAH gagglers say, Alan. Bad idea.
>
> > I'm sorry, but I just don't believe you.
>
> Well, then you're making yet another common mistakes, that of thinking I
> care. :)
>
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

olympusE1

January 21st 07, 01:48 AM

olympusE1

January 21st 07, 01:53 AM

....oh I don't think you care, Mr. Jimenez... my threshold for
self-delusion is far below yours. You obviously don't care about
anyone or anything, other than the sound of your own voice and the
clacking of your keyboard. What I do think is that you're neither man

enough nor mature enough, despite your advancing years, to admit when
you're wrong; your latest retort is yet another descent into nonsense
where you babble on about how the name in the FAA database must be
"some other Frank Hitlaw." Your insatiable need to annoy people is
beyond belief, and THAT, Mr. Jimenez is what I define as a bad idea.
What you think of that definition is, in itself, the definition of
irrelevance.

And as for "Certified Computer Network Expert" I got that from YOUR BD5

website. You've spent "320 hours of study and 800 pages of reading" to

have achieved the certification from the firm for which you now lecture

under contract according to your website. (While I know that your
quotation of those figures is meant to impress, [otherwise why would
you spend so much time tooting your own horn] in my case you're
talking/typing to someone who goes through a couple thousand pages of
manuals every time the rat *******s at Adobe come out with another
version of Photoshop. My "certificates" for wading through those
tomes, though, have "pay to the order of" on them, and that's just fine

and dandy with me.)

So there you go, Mr. Jimenez: We have to agree to disagree. It is my
opinion that you are a rude, petulant, self-centered and self-absorbed
overweight child, and I imagine that you would disagree with that
opinion.

With that, plonk!

Off you and your opinions, and your excuses, and your snide remarks,
and most especially your childish emoticons go into the trash bin.

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> "olympusE1" > wrote in message
> ps.com...
> > ...if you have indeed "checked that already" then why is it that you, a
> > "Certified Computer Network expert"
>
> You must be thinking of the wrong person, or else you're making the common
> mistake of parroting what other RAH gagglers say, Alan. Bad idea.
>
> > I'm sorry, but I just don't believe you.
>
> Well, then you're making yet another common mistakes, that of thinking I
> care. :)
>
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

BobR

January 21st 07, 02:18 AM

Well, Jaun has most clearly won another convert. Seems you have summed
up in one post that which is Jaun and how the majority (if not all) of
the participants in RAH feel about him. Well Said!

I did love your point about his "Certified Computer Network Expert"
boast. Seems Jaun has this need to constantly try to impress with his
self proclaimed "accomplishments". He somehow thinks that he has done
so much more than anyone else simply because others find no need to try
and impress everyone with what they have done. My experience has been
that those who shout the loudest about what they have done and what
their qualifications are have the least to boast about.

olympusE1 wrote:
> ...oh I don't think you care, Mr. Jimenez... my threshold for
> self-delusion is far below yours. You obviously don't care about
> anyone or anything, other than the sound of your own voice and the
> clacking of your keyboard. What I do think is that you're neither man
> enough nor mature enough, despite your advancing years, to admit when
> you're wrong; your latest retort is yet another descent into nonsense
> where you babble on about how the name in the FAA database must be
> "some other Frank Hitlaw." Your insatiable need to annoy people is
> beyond belief, and THAT, Mr. Jimenez is what I define as a bad idea.
> What you think of that definition is, in itself, the definition of
> irrelevance, but I will tell you this: One day you're going to annoy
> the wrong person despite your "yo soy mas macho" nonsense here. Having
> been within arms length of you on three occasions in the past 18
> months, I can attest to this:
>
> And as for "Certified Computer Network Expert" I got that from YOUR BD5
> website. You've spent "320 hours of study and 800 pages of reading" to
> have achieved the certification from the firm for which you now lecture
> under contract according to your website. (While I know that your
> quotation of those figures is meant to impress, in my case you're
> talking/typing to someone who goes through a couple thousand pages of
> manuals every time the rat *******s at Adobe come out with another
> version of Photoshop. My "certificates" for wading through those
> tomes, though, have "pay to the order of" on them, and that's just fine
> and dandy with me. Too, I know for a fact that at least one of the
> people you regularly belittle here has a pair of postgraduate degrees
> from a university that the pink elephants mention attending in THEIR
> bios...)
>
> So there you go, Mr. Jimenez: We have to agree to disagree. It is my
> opinion that you are a rude, petulant, self-centered and self-absorbed
> overweight child, and I imagine that you would disagree with that
> opinion.
>
> With that, plonk!
>
> Off you and your opinions, and your excuses, and your snide remarks,
> and most especially your childish emoticons go into the trash bin.
>
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
> > "olympusE1" > wrote in message
> > ps.com...
> > > ...if you have indeed "checked that already" then why is it that you, a
> > > "Certified Computer Network expert"
> >
> > You must be thinking of the wrong person, or else you're making the common
> > mistake of parroting what other RAH gagglers say, Alan. Bad idea.
> >
> > > I'm sorry, but I just don't believe you.
> >
> > Well, then you're making yet another common mistakes, that of thinking I
> > care. :)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Highflyer

January 21st 07, 04:06 AM

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
...
>
> "ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
> ...
>> In article >, Juan Jimenez
>> says...
>>>
>>>Is that kinda like the joys of peer pressure when beloved billionaire war
>>>heros die in things you build? :)
>>
>> The NTSB probable cause says it all my conscience is clear .But I do
>> feel bad
>> it happened.
>>>
>>>good thing my son will never have to sue me to get paid for honest work.
>>>nor
>>>will he ever have to worry about child abuse. :)
>>
>>
>> Once again I'll ask what son sued me for "honest work" Name please ,when
>> etc.
>> Credibility jaunita ,it's about credibility .
>>
>> Child abuse?? What child abuse?? Same reply what child ,when ,where?
>> Credibility
>> jaun ,it's about credibility and you still have none. Prove what you say
>> that's
>> all. What a phony you are and I bet your son is just as bad :-)
>
> I don't have to prove it, kiddo. My son has never had to sue me to get
> paid for work he does for me, and he has never been abused. If you know
> otherwise, let us know.
>
> What's the matter, Chucksteak, something ring a bell? :)

I sure am glad MY son never had to pretend he didn't know me because of
something I said in public!

Highflyer

Scott[_1_]

January 21st 07, 05:02 AM

I could have sworn you said you had some certificate in computer
networking or something like that? Do you have some sort of paperwork
that says you are "computer literate"? If so, another poster (and
myself) think you should have been able to find a Hitlaw in the database
with some sort of computer training you said you have. Whether or not
it is the same person you repeatedly speak about is irrelevant. You
apparently did not get a single hit on "Hitlaw". Several of us did.

Scott

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> "olympusE1" > wrote in message
> ps.com...
>
>>...if you have indeed "checked that already" then why is it that you, a
>>"Certified Computer Network expert"
>
>
> You must be thinking of the wrong person, or else you're making the common
> mistake of parroting what other RAH gagglers say, Alan. Bad idea.
>
>
>>I'm sorry, but I just don't believe you.
>
>
> Well, then you're making yet another common mistakes, that of thinking I
> care. :)
>
>
>
>

ChuckSlusarczyk

January 21st 07, 02:57 PM

In article om>, BobR says...
>
>Standard Zoom and Jaun technique...when the FACTS are presented and
>they don't support their lie, either deny the facts, deny they said
>that, or change the argument. In this case, its all three. At least
>one of Jaun's statements were true...HE COULDN'T FIND Hitlaw in the
>database. That fact shouldn't be a surprise for anyone here.

Hats off to those who ARE computer savvy enough to have caught jaun in his own
incompetence. Ya never know who's the person behind the name tag "or" what they
know. Time and time again I've seen the brightest,the smartest the most
experienced never say much on their own behalf or toot their own horn.

As Sister Mary Holy Smoke used to say "an empty can makes the most
noise".However when needed these "real experts" come out and show that the
loudmouth is just that a loudmouth. I love when that happens and kudos to you
all.

Over the years of the zoom wars I've seen this happen a few times.Such as the
time zoom was boasting about pulling in excess of 10 g's positive and 9 negative
in a Sukoi. As you can imagine those of us who put up a resistance to such
statements caught holy hell from his zoomness for attacking him. One respondent
seemed to be quite knowledgeable the the effects of G forces on the human body.
After a heated exchange between zoom and that person where zoom said that that
person didn't know what they were talking about.

That person posted who they were and where they worked.Turns out she was a
Medical Dr and Engineer at some centrifuge facility and did G studies every day.
zoom as usual tucked tail and ran.Just like jaun is doing or will do shortly. It
is now known as "the Battle of the Sukoi G's" and is worth a combat ribbon for
the participants.

The same when zoom posted under a different name and swore it wasn't him.An
English Major who taught at a Major University promptly showed that zoom was the
author of the posts by comparing the posts and the distinctive writing style of
zoom. Now known as the "Battle of the ellipses"

Then the time zoom didn't know who was countering him on legal matters saying
that this guy didn't know what he was talking about. I bet zoom rues the day he
threatened that poster with a lawsuit then found out he just threatened a
lawyer. That was zooms introduction to Tony Pucillo .I bet zoom has regretted
telling Tony "he's in violation of law and my attorney has been notified".

There are other instances but the lesson here is to be truthful about who you
are and don't pick fights with someone who may be smarter then you :-) jaun and
zoom are so alike it's bizarre. This time jaun once again proved that he lacks
credibility and is also incompetent on a computeras well. Life can be good :-)

Chuck S RAH 14-1 ret

"credibility it was always about credibility" chuck s

[email protected]

January 21st 07, 11:40 PM

ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
> In article om>, BobR says...
> >
> >Standard Zoom and Jaun technique...when the FACTS are presented and
> >they don't support their lie, either deny the facts, deny they said
> >that, or change the argument. In this case, its all three. At least
> >one of Jaun's statements were true...HE COULDN'T FIND Hitlaw in the
> >database. That fact shouldn't be a surprise for anyone here.
>
> Hats off to those who ARE computer savvy enough to have caught jaun in his own
> incompetence. Ya never know who's the person behind the name tag "or" what they
> know. Time and time again I've seen the brightest,the smartest the most
> experienced never say much on their own behalf or toot their own horn.
>
> As Sister Mary Holy Smoke used to say "an empty can makes the most
> noise".However when needed these "real experts" come out and show that the
> loudmouth is just that a loudmouth. I love when that happens and kudos to you
> all.
>
> Over the years of the zoom wars I've seen this happen a few times.Such as the
> time zoom was boasting about pulling in excess of 10 g's positive and 9 negative
> in a Sukoi. As you can imagine those of us who put up a resistance to such
> statements caught holy hell from his zoomness for attacking him. One respondent
> seemed to be quite knowledgeable the the effects of G forces on the human body.
> After a heated exchange between zoom and that person where zoom said that that
> person didn't know what they were talking about.
>
> That person posted who they were and where they worked.Turns out she was a
> Medical Dr and Engineer at some centrifuge facility and did G studies every day.
> zoom as usual tucked tail and ran.Just like jaun is doing or will do shortly. It
> is now known as "the Battle of the Sukoi G's" and is worth a combat ribbon for
> the participants.
>
> The same when zoom posted under a different name and swore it wasn't him.An
> English Major who taught at a Major University promptly showed that zoom was the
> author of the posts by comparing the posts and the distinctive writing style of
> zoom. Now known as the "Battle of the ellipses"
>
> Then the time zoom didn't know who was countering him on legal matters saying
> that this guy didn't know what he was talking about. I bet zoom rues the day he
> threatened that poster with a lawsuit then found out he just threatened a
> lawyer. That was zooms introduction to Tony Pucillo .I bet zoom has regretted
> telling Tony "he's in violation of law and my attorney has been notified".
>
> There are other instances but the lesson here is to be truthful about who you
> are and don't pick fights with someone who may be smarter then you :-) jaun and
> zoom are so alike it's bizarre. This time jaun once again proved that he lacks
> credibility and is also incompetent on a computeras well. Life can be good :-)
>
> Chuck S RAH 14-1 ret
>
> "credibility it was always about credibility" chuck s

Chuck;

Isn't it amazing that a computer expert can't find me in a government
data base. Seems everyone else didn't have a problem finding me ,that
is if it is me. You know that there is always the possibility that
another Frank M.Hitlaw earned a Private pilot ,A&P and Sr parachute
riggers ratings on exactly the same days as I said I got them. In juan
and zzzoom speak that would be a logical conclusion because it fits
their warped reality.

Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring

[email protected]

January 21st 07, 11:40 PM

Harry K

January 22nd 07, 03:51 AM

wrote:
> ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
> > In article om>, BobR says...
> > >
> > >Standard Zoom and Jaun technique...when the FACTS are presented and
> > >they don't support their lie, either deny the facts, deny they said
> > >that, or change the argument. In this case, its all three. At least
> > >one of Jaun's statements were true...HE COULDN'T FIND Hitlaw in the
> > >database. That fact shouldn't be a surprise for anyone here.
> >
> > Hats off to those who ARE computer savvy enough to have caught jaun in his own
> > incompetence. Ya never know who's the person behind the name tag "or" what they
> > know. Time and time again I've seen the brightest,the smartest the most
> > experienced never say much on their own behalf or toot their own horn.
> >
> > As Sister Mary Holy Smoke used to say "an empty can makes the most
> > noise".However when needed these "real experts" come out and show that the
> > loudmouth is just that a loudmouth. I love when that happens and kudos to you
> > all.
> >
> > Over the years of the zoom wars I've seen this happen a few times.Such as the
> > time zoom was boasting about pulling in excess of 10 g's positive and 9 negative
> > in a Sukoi. As you can imagine those of us who put up a resistance to such
> > statements caught holy hell from his zoomness for attacking him. One respondent
> > seemed to be quite knowledgeable the the effects of G forces on the human body.
> > After a heated exchange between zoom and that person where zoom said that that
> > person didn't know what they were talking about.
> >
> > That person posted who they were and where they worked.Turns out she was a
> > Medical Dr and Engineer at some centrifuge facility and did G studies every day.
> > zoom as usual tucked tail and ran.Just like jaun is doing or will do shortly. It
> > is now known as "the Battle of the Sukoi G's" and is worth a combat ribbon for
> > the participants.
> >
> > The same when zoom posted under a different name and swore it wasn't him.An
> > English Major who taught at a Major University promptly showed that zoom was the
> > author of the posts by comparing the posts and the distinctive writing style of
> > zoom. Now known as the "Battle of the ellipses"
> >
> > Then the time zoom didn't know who was countering him on legal matters saying
> > that this guy didn't know what he was talking about. I bet zoom rues the day he
> > threatened that poster with a lawsuit then found out he just threatened a
> > lawyer. That was zooms introduction to Tony Pucillo .I bet zoom has regretted
> > telling Tony "he's in violation of law and my attorney has been notified".
> >
> > There are other instances but the lesson here is to be truthful about who you
> > are and don't pick fights with someone who may be smarter then you :-) jaun and
> > zoom are so alike it's bizarre. This time jaun once again proved that he lacks
> > credibility and is also incompetent on a computeras well. Life can be good :-)
> >
> > Chuck S RAH 14-1 ret
> >
> > "credibility it was always about credibility" chuck s
>
> Chuck;
>
> Isn't it amazing that a computer expert can't find me in a government
> data base. Seems everyone else didn't have a problem finding me ,that
> is if it is me. You know that there is always the possibility that
> another Frank M.Hitlaw earned a Private pilot ,A&P and Sr parachute
> riggers ratings on exactly the same days as I said I got them. In juan
> and zzzoom speak that would be a logical conclusion because it fits
> their warped reality.
>
> Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring

I suspect he did find it and figured that if he claimed he couldn't no
one would check. Seeing how he likes to lie and has displayed
considerable stupidity that would fit.

Harry K

olympusE1

January 22nd 07, 03:58 AM

....saying he's displayed "considerable stupidity" ranks right up there,
in studies done by the Department of Measureable Understatement, with
"boy, that sure was some loud noise at Cape Canaveral the other day..."

Harry K wrote:
> wrote:
> > ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
> > > In article om>, BobR says...
> > > >
> > > >Standard Zoom and Jaun technique...when the FACTS are presented and
> > > >they don't support their lie, either deny the facts, deny they said
> > > >that, or change the argument. In this case, its all three. At least
> > > >one of Jaun's statements were true...HE COULDN'T FIND Hitlaw in the
> > > >database. That fact shouldn't be a surprise for anyone here.
> > >
> > > Hats off to those who ARE computer savvy enough to have caught jaun in his own
> > > incompetence. Ya never know who's the person behind the name tag "or" what they
> > > know. Time and time again I've seen the brightest,the smartest the most
> > > experienced never say much on their own behalf or toot their own horn.
> > >
> > > As Sister Mary Holy Smoke used to say "an empty can makes the most
> > > noise".However when needed these "real experts" come out and show that the
> > > loudmouth is just that a loudmouth. I love when that happens and kudos to you
> > > all.
> > >
> > > Over the years of the zoom wars I've seen this happen a few times.Such as the
> > > time zoom was boasting about pulling in excess of 10 g's positive and 9 negative
> > > in a Sukoi. As you can imagine those of us who put up a resistance to such
> > > statements caught holy hell from his zoomness for attacking him. One respondent
> > > seemed to be quite knowledgeable the the effects of G forces on the human body.
> > > After a heated exchange between zoom and that person where zoom said that that
> > > person didn't know what they were talking about.
> > >
> > > That person posted who they were and where they worked.Turns out she was a
> > > Medical Dr and Engineer at some centrifuge facility and did G studies every day.
> > > zoom as usual tucked tail and ran.Just like jaun is doing or will do shortly. It
> > > is now known as "the Battle of the Sukoi G's" and is worth a combat ribbon for
> > > the participants.
> > >
> > > The same when zoom posted under a different name and swore it wasn't him.An
> > > English Major who taught at a Major University promptly showed that zoom was the
> > > author of the posts by comparing the posts and the distinctive writing style of
> > > zoom. Now known as the "Battle of the ellipses"
> > >
> > > Then the time zoom didn't know who was countering him on legal matters saying
> > > that this guy didn't know what he was talking about. I bet zoom rues the day he
> > > threatened that poster with a lawsuit then found out he just threatened a
> > > lawyer. That was zooms introduction to Tony Pucillo .I bet zoom has regretted
> > > telling Tony "he's in violation of law and my attorney has been notified".
> > >
> > > There are other instances but the lesson here is to be truthful about who you
> > > are and don't pick fights with someone who may be smarter then you :-) jaun and
> > > zoom are so alike it's bizarre. This time jaun once again proved that he lacks
> > > credibility and is also incompetent on a computeras well. Life can be good :-)
> > >
> > > Chuck S RAH 14-1 ret
> > >
> > > "credibility it was always about credibility" chuck s
> >
> > Chuck;
> >
> > Isn't it amazing that a computer expert can't find me in a government
> > data base. Seems everyone else didn't have a problem finding me ,that
> > is if it is me. You know that there is always the possibility that
> > another Frank M.Hitlaw earned a Private pilot ,A&P and Sr parachute
> > riggers ratings on exactly the same days as I said I got them. In juan
> > and zzzoom speak that would be a logical conclusion because it fits
> > their warped reality.
> >
> > Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring
>
> I suspect he did find it and figured that if he claimed he couldn't no
> one would check. Seeing how he likes to lie and has displayed
> considerable stupidity that would fit.
>
> Harry K

olympusE1

January 22nd 07, 03:04 PM

....oldest cliche' in the world, richard: "those who can't do, teach."

> I curious - when you do your "computer consulting" is it the same way
> you do the BD5 - tell everyone how much you know, and how they should
> do stuff, and how wonderful the product is, without ever really doing
> it yourself?

ChuckSlusarczyk

January 22nd 07, 11:21 PM

In article om>, olympusE1
says...
>
>...oldest cliche' in the world, richard: "those who can't do, teach."
>
>
>> I curious - when you do your "computer consulting" is it the same way
>> you do the BD5 - tell everyone how much you know, and how they should
>> do stuff, and how wonderful the product is, without ever really doing
>> it yourself?
>

yawn sure got quiet after it was proven that not only is he a liar, he is not
credible and last but not least incompetent. That's a hoot.Next he'll tell us it
wasn't him but another jaun LOL!!!

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret

Scott[_1_]

January 23rd 07, 02:05 AM

Oh God! You mean there's more than ONE? ****! Blows my whole theory
that lightning never strikes the same place (newsgroup in this case)
twice...

Scott

ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:

> In article om>, olympusE1
> says...
>
>>...oldest cliche' in the world, richard: "those who can't do, teach."
>>
>>
>>
>>>I curious - when you do your "computer consulting" is it the same way
>>>you do the BD5 - tell everyone how much you know, and how they should
>>>do stuff, and how wonderful the product is, without ever really doing
>>>it yourself?
>>
>
> yawn sure got quiet after it was proven that not only is he a liar, he is not
> credible and last but not least incompetent. That's a hoot.Next he'll tell us it
> wasn't him but another jaun LOL!!!
>
> Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret
>

Dan[_2_]

January 23rd 07, 02:27 AM

Scott wrote:
> Oh God! You mean there's more than ONE? ****! Blows my whole theory
> that lightning never strikes the same place (newsgroup in this case)
> twice...
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
>
>> In article om>,
>> olympusE1
>> says...
>>
>>> ...oldest cliche' in the world, richard: "those who can't do, teach."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I curious - when you do your "computer consulting" is it the same way
>>>> you do the BD5 - tell everyone how much you know, and how they should
>>>> do stuff, and how wonderful the product is, without ever really doing
>>>> it yourself?
>>>
>>
>> yawn sure got quiet after it was proven that not only is he a liar, he
>> is not
>> credible and last but not least incompetent. That's a hoot.Next he'll
>> tell us it
>> wasn't him but another jaun LOL!!!
>>
>> Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret
>>
6 of jaun, half dozen of another jaun?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Alphonse Le Creur[_1_]

January 23rd 07, 06:47 AM

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
:

>
> "Alphonse Le Creur." > wrote in message
> .130...
>>>
>>> Sorry, bubba, but I can fit into my BD-5.
>>
>> Funny how you haven't got the confidence to fly it then. .
>
> Funny how everyone who knows they'll never own one expresses their
> feelings in terms of something they will never have a chance to do. :)
>

I'm absolutely certain I'll never own one.

I'll also never eat broken glass, bath in **** or drive hot needles into
my eyes.

But that's besides the point,.

Point is; you're too big a fairy and to little a pilot to fly it
yourself..

Period.

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 24th 07, 01:48 AM

Of course I brought it up, you then tried to make some comedy of it. Keep
your day job. :)

"red12049" > wrote in message
...
> Juan,
>
> Please read back your own posts. You brought up "Reverends", not I. I
> simply asked, since you brought them up, if you had a problem with them
> also.
>
>
> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
> .. .
>> For trying to transpose your own problems to others, and on the basis of
>> "religion" at that. :)
>>
>> "red12049" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> My excuse for what, Juan?
>>>
>>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Nah, I just ignore them. What's your excuse? :)
>>>>
>>>> "red12049" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> Do you have a problem with reverends, or other religious
>>>>> professionals?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "red12049" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> Ummmm.... Yes, Juan, I am the judge of that, for me. And I can even
>>>>>>> point it out to others, so they can make their own judgements, for
>>>>>>> themselves. As can you. That is not a delusion Juan, that is life.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's what "reverends" do as well. Knock yourself out. :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>
>
>

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 24th 07, 01:49 AM

No, son, you don't understand, you don't determine what is the question. :)

"red12049" > wrote in message
...
> No Juan, that ISN'T the question. Please keep your own statements
> straight... YOU said you could not find Mr. Hitlaw in the database, not
> that the one that turned up wasn't the same.
>
> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
> .. .
>>
>> "Richard Riley" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> It's a real puzzler. I can see how that one would have stumped you.
>>> In the future, when you're searching a database and you don't know
>>> some of the search values, use a wild card or leave them blank.
>>
>> That's exactly what I did.
>>
>> The question remains, is this the same Frank Hitlaw? Director of
>> Maintenace at Far 129 airlines less than 10 years since he got his A&P
>> ticket? Sorry, but I don't buy it. :)
>>
>>
>> --
>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>
>
>

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 24th 07, 01:53 AM

"Richard Riley" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 17:12:37 -0400, "Juan Jimenez" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Richard Riley" > wrote in message
...
>>>
>>> It's a real puzzler. I can see how that one would have stumped you.
>>> In the future, when you're searching a database and you don't know
>>> some of the search values, use a wild card or leave them blank.
>>
>>That's exactly what I did.
>>
>
> Really? That's very odd. Because that's not the results that you cut
> and pasted before -
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> FAA REGISTRY
> Name Inquiry - List Results
> Total Names found for HITLAW
> in the country of UNITED STATES is 0
>
> FAA REGISTRY
> Name Inquiry - List Results
> Total Names found for HITLAW
> in the country of INDONESIA is 0
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Now if I go to the FAA registry, and search for Hitlaw and click off
> United States for the country, I get
>
>
> FAA REGISTRY
> Name Inquiry - List Results
> Total Names found for HITLAW
> in the country of UNITED STATES is 0
>
> Which is the same result that you got. And if I click off Indonesia,
> I get the same Indonesia result that you got.
>
> So I'm thinking that you probably didn't leave the country blank. It's
> OK, that's the kind of error that non-computer people make all the
> time. There isn't any way for you to have known, it just comes with
> experience.
>
> I curious - when you do your "computer consulting" is it the same way
> you do the BD5 - tell everyone how much you know, and how they should
> do stuff, and how wonderful the product is, without ever really doing
> it yourself?

Not really, but since you're not the one paying the grand/day to have me
teach, your opinion on the subject is irrelevant, isn't it? <chuckle>

Nice try, but this is prepubescent quality material, par for the course for
your leval of intelligence. :)

Of course, it never ocurred to your braindead intellect that a database
which allows such a query ought to be able to find a record based on last
name and country, no? But of course, you're in the same situation as the
FAA, couldn't construct a proper SQL query if your life depended on it.
Right. <chuckle>

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 24th 07, 01:54 AM

I go quiet because I'm working. You go quiet because billionaire war heros
die on your airplanes. Guess which one is worse, boy. :)

"ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
...
>
> yawn sure got quiet after it was proven that not only is he a liar, he is
> not
> credible and last but not least incompetent. That's a hoot.Next he'll tell
> us it
> wasn't him but another jaun LOL!!!
>
> Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret
>

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 24th 07, 01:58 AM

"olympusE1" > wrote in message
ps.com...
> ...oh I don't think you care, Mr. Jimenez... my threshold for
> self-delusion is far below yours.

Oh, bull****. I'm still waiting for you to have the balls to confront me at
OSH like you said you would, years ago. Shut up and go back to your high
chair, boy.

> And as for "Certified Computer Network Expert" I got that from YOUR BD5
> website. You've spent "320 hours of study and 800 pages of reading" to
> have achieved the certification from the firm for which you now lecture
> under contract according to your website.

Your reading skills suck. The certification has nothing to do with networks.
:)

BTW, why do you have images on your "web site" from companies who fired you?
Isn't that unethical? :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 24th 07, 02:02 AM

"ChuckSlusaczyk" > wrote in message
...
> In article >, Juan Jimenez
> says...
>>In other words, feeding the RAH gaggle the same thing it dishes out. Can't
>>handle it? Get out of the kitchen. :)
>>
>>You can ask for something you're not willing to give. Ask ChuckSteak about
>>that, he knows exactly what I am talking about. So does Hitlaw. :)
>
> And just exactly is what? All I know is you lied about Frank and his
> credentials

Let me refresh your memory, boy.

This is what started it. You were shown it again several times. You have
admitted that you did in fact start it and you have refused, like a good
little ****ant coward that you are, to apologize, and now you whine like a
stuck pig everytime I forcefeed you your own crap with a ramrod several
times a month.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.aviation.homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/209482904328b687/63be5e18d190b5c2?lnk=st&q=Slusarczyk+toadie&rnum=1#63be5e18d190b5c2

Any more war heroes stupid enough to buy airplanes from you lately?

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 24th 07, 02:03 AM

"Highflyer" > wrote in message
...
>
> I sure am glad MY son never had to pretend he didn't know me because of
> something I said in public!

Sorry to hear that, what did you say that caused that reaction? :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

ChuckSlusarczyk

January 24th 07, 02:36 AM

In article >, Juan Jimenez says...
>Let me refresh your memory, boy.
>
>This is what started it. You were shown it again several times. You have
>admitted that you did in fact start it and you have refused, like a good
>little ****ant coward that you are, to apologize, and now you whine like a
>stuck pig everytime I forcefeed you your own crap with a ramrod several
>times a month.
>
>http://groups.google.com/group/rec.aviation.homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/209482904328b687/63be5e18d190b5c2?lnk=st&q=Slusarczyk+toadie&rnum=1#63be5e18d190b5c2
>
>Any more war heroes stupid enough to buy airplanes from you lately?

Yawn...Apologize for what?? calling a toady a toady?? Fat chance.What I said
was true then and true now, once a toady always a toady,and a racist one at
that. Remember the Alamo!!

Chuck S rAH-14/1 ret. and proud of it

Robert Bonomi

January 24th 07, 02:37 AM

In article >, Dan > wrote:
>Scott wrote:
>> Oh God! You mean there's more than ONE? ****! Blows my whole theory
>> that lightning never strikes the same place (newsgroup in this case)
>> twice...
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>
>>
>> ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
>>
>>> In article om>,
>>> olympusE1
>>> says...
>>>
>>>> ...oldest cliche' in the world, richard: "those who can't do, teach."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I curious - when you do your "computer consulting" is it the same way
>>>>> you do the BD5 - tell everyone how much you know, and how they should
>>>>> do stuff, and how wonderful the product is, without ever really doing
>>>>> it yourself?
>>>>
>>>
>>> yawn sure got quiet after it was proven that not only is he a liar, he
>>> is not
>>> credible and last but not least incompetent. That's a hoot.Next he'll
>>> tell us it
>>> wasn't him but another jaun LOL!!!
>>>
>>> Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret
>>>
>6 of jaun, half dozen of another jaun?

Rumor mill has it, he's going to change his name. to 'Ahmal'.

After all, When you've seen jaun, you've seen ahmal.

*groan*

Montblack

January 24th 07, 03:08 AM

("Juan Jimenez" wrote)
>I go quiet because I'm working. You go quiet because billionaire war heros
>die on your airplanes. Guess which one is worse, boy. :)

Scott Crossfield died in a Cessna 210 last year.

Can you count the similarities between the two accidents, Juan?

A well proven design
A respected company
An American hero
Fateful decisions made by the pilot...

Montblack

olympusE1

January 24th 07, 03:19 AM

....logic won't work in pinkie's world...

On Jan 23, 8:08 pm, "Montblack"
> wrote:
> ("Pinkie Pendejo" wrote)
>
> >I go quiet because I'm working. You go quiet because billionaire war heros
> >die on your airplanes. Guess which one is worse, boy. :)Scott Crossfield died in a Cessna 210 last year.
>
> Can you count the similarities between the two accidents, Juan?
>
> A well proven design
> A respected company
> An American hero
> Fateful decisions made by the pilot...
>
> Montblack

olympusE1

January 24th 07, 03:24 AM

....it just doesn't make any difference to pinkie... he couldn't find
it, ergo, it doesn't exist. of course, you and i and everyone else can
find the record, but because pinkie can't no-one can.

must be wonderful to be him, eh?

On Jan 23, 6:53 pm, "Pinkie Pendejo" > wrote:
>
>
> Nice try, but this is prepubescent quality material, par for the course for
> your leval of intelligence. :)
>
> Of course, it never ocurred to your braindead intellect that a database
> which allows such a query ought to be able to find a record based on last
> name and country, no? But of course, you're in the same situation as the
> FAA, couldn't construct a proper SQL query if your life depended on it.
> Right. <chuckle>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -

red12049[_1_]

January 24th 07, 03:38 AM

Juan,

I didn't try to make "anything" of it, I simply asked you a question about
your comment? Is there something incorrect about the procedure I followed?

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
.. .
> Of course I brought it up, you then tried to make some comedy of it. Keep
> your day job. :)
>
> "red12049" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Juan,
>>
>> Please read back your own posts. You brought up "Reverends", not I. I
>> simply asked, since you brought them up, if you had a problem with them
>> also.
>>
>>
>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
>> .. .
>>> For trying to transpose your own problems to others, and on the basis of
>>> "religion" at that. :)
>>>
>>> "red12049" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> My excuse for what, Juan?
>>>>
>>>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> Nah, I just ignore them. What's your excuse? :)
>>>>>
>>>>> "red12049" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> Do you have a problem with reverends, or other religious
>>>>>> professionals?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "red12049" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>> Ummmm.... Yes, Juan, I am the judge of that, for me. And I can
>>>>>>>> even point it out to others, so they can make their own judgements,
>>>>>>>> for themselves. As can you. That is not a delusion Juan, that is
>>>>>>>> life.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's what "reverends" do as well. Knock yourself out. :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>

red12049[_1_]

January 24th 07, 03:39 AM

Juan,

Since "I" don't get to make that determination, who does?

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
.. .
> No, son, you don't understand, you don't determine what is the question.
> :)
>
> "red12049" > wrote in message
> ...
>> No Juan, that ISN'T the question. Please keep your own statements
>> straight... YOU said you could not find Mr. Hitlaw in the database, not
>> that the one that turned up wasn't the same.
>>
>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
>> .. .
>>>
>>> "Richard Riley" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> It's a real puzzler. I can see how that one would have stumped you.
>>>> In the future, when you're searching a database and you don't know
>>>> some of the search values, use a wild card or leave them blank.
>>>
>>> That's exactly what I did.
>>>
>>> The question remains, is this the same Frank Hitlaw? Director of
>>> Maintenace at Far 129 airlines less than 10 years since he got his A&P
>>> ticket? Sorry, but I don't buy it. :)
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>

red12049[_1_]

January 24th 07, 03:48 AM

Juan,

For whatever it may be worth, I read that whole thread. You posted this
publicly, but did not explain the manner in which it relates to whatever may
be tormenting you. I see only a 5 plus year old version of what I am seeing
here now: Everybody insulting everybody, with you seeming to be at the
center. What am I missing here?

As an aside, I have read most of your posts regaring the Walton crash.
Somehow, "war hero" and "stupid" don't seem to go together, and I am sure
the surviving family would be distressed to see him referred to in this
manner. It also trivializes all of our military service, including yours.

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
.. .
>
> "ChuckSlusaczyk" > wrote in message
> ...
>> In article >, Juan Jimenez
>> says...
>>>In other words, feeding the RAH gaggle the same thing it dishes out.
>>>Can't
>>>handle it? Get out of the kitchen. :)
>>>
>>>You can ask for something you're not willing to give. Ask ChuckSteak
>>>about
>>>that, he knows exactly what I am talking about. So does Hitlaw. :)
>>
>> And just exactly is what? All I know is you lied about Frank and his
>> credentials
>
> Let me refresh your memory, boy.
>
> This is what started it. You were shown it again several times. You have
> admitted that you did in fact start it and you have refused, like a good
> little ****ant coward that you are, to apologize, and now you whine like a
> stuck pig everytime I forcefeed you your own crap with a ramrod several
> times a month.
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.aviation.homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/209482904328b687/63be5e18d190b5c2?lnk=st&q=Slusarczyk+toadie&rnum=1#63be5e18d190b5c2
>
> Any more war heroes stupid enough to buy airplanes from you lately?
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>

ChuckSlusarczyk

January 24th 07, 03:50 AM

In article >, Montblack says...
>
>("Juan Jimenez" wrote)
>>I go quiet because I'm working. You go quiet because billionaire war heros
>>die on your airplanes. Guess which one is worse, boy. :)
>
>
>Scott Crossfield died in a Cessna 210 last year.
>
>Can you count the similarities between the two accidents, Juan?
>
>A well proven design
>A respected company
>An American hero
>Fateful decisions made by the pilot...
>
>
>Montblack
\
Thank you !!

Chuck S

ChuckSlusarczyk

January 24th 07, 03:53 AM

In article >, Robert Bonomi says...
>>>>
>>6 of jaun, half dozen of another jaun?
>
>Rumor mill has it, he's going to change his name. to 'Ahmal'.
>
>After all, When you've seen jaun, you've seen ahmal.
>
>
>*groan*

Good one!!LOL!!

Chuck S

Dan[_2_]

January 24th 07, 04:15 AM

Robert Bonomi wrote:
> In article >, Dan > wrote:
>> Scott wrote:
>>> Oh God! You mean there's more than ONE? ****! Blows my whole theory
>>> that lightning never strikes the same place (newsgroup in this case)
>>> twice...
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article om>,
>>>> olympusE1
>>>> says...
>>>>
>>>>> ...oldest cliche' in the world, richard: "those who can't do, teach."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I curious - when you do your "computer consulting" is it the same way
>>>>>> you do the BD5 - tell everyone how much you know, and how they should
>>>>>> do stuff, and how wonderful the product is, without ever really doing
>>>>>> it yourself?
>>>> yawn sure got quiet after it was proven that not only is he a liar, he
>>>> is not
>>>> credible and last but not least incompetent. That's a hoot.Next he'll
>>>> tell us it
>>>> wasn't him but another jaun LOL!!!
>>>>
>>>> Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret
>>>>
>> 6 of jaun, half dozen of another jaun?
>
> Rumor mill has it, he's going to change his name. to 'Ahmal'.
>
> After all, When you've seen jaun, you've seen ahmal.
>
>
> *groan*
>
Look, pal, just 'cause I did it....... :)

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Alphonse Le Creur[_1_]

January 24th 07, 04:20 AM

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
:

> Of course I brought it up, you then tried to make some comedy of it.
> Keep your day job. :)
>

Which is more than you can do, apparently.

BobR

January 24th 07, 04:36 AM

Jaun knows better but he uses it as a weapon to attack Chuck. Its just
another lie that he repeats over and over. Why he continues to do so
when everybody knows its a lie, can read the reports and easily
determine that he is lying is anybodys guess.

Just know this, Jaun will always get the last word. So, as long as you
continue to reply to his rants, he will always make one more response.

On Jan 23, 9:08 pm, "Montblack"
> wrote:
> ("Juan Jimenez" wrote)
>
> >I go quiet because I'm working. You go quiet because billionaire war heros
> >die on your airplanes. Guess which one is worse, boy. :)Scott Crossfield died in a Cessna 210 last year.
>
> Can you count the similarities between the two accidents, Juan?
>
> A well proven design
> A respected company
> An American hero
> Fateful decisions made by the pilot...
>
> Montblack

Alphonse Le Creur[_1_]

January 24th 07, 04:48 AM

"BobR" > wrote in
ups.com:

> Jaun knows better but he uses it as a weapon to attack Chuck. Its
> just another lie that he repeats over and over. Why he continues to
> do so when everybody knows its a lie, can read the reports and easily
> determine that he is lying is anybodys guess.
>
> Just know this, Jaun will always get the last word. So, as long as
> you continue to reply to his rants, he will always make one more
> response.

I count on it.

Scott[_1_]

January 24th 07, 12:30 PM

I love the small print at the bottom of the Certificate..."The ITIL
certification scheme is officially supported by" ... SCHEME...I LOVE IT!

What IS I.T.? Last time I checked IT had to do with Information
Technology (specifically, the exchange of information between
computers). Computers exchange information over networks. How can you
get a Manager's Certificate in IT Service Management without knowing
networking?

I'm attending the University of Wisconsin and am close to graduating
with a Bachelor's in Information and Communications Technology. They
also offer a degree in Information Technology Management (which sounds
like your certificate). Here is a snippet from that course of study:

"The technical curriculum in the telecommunication area focuses on
contemporary methods of analysis, design, and telecommunication systems
solutions. Technical courses are delivered in areas including telephony,
networking, telecommunication policy and regulation, administration,
video, imaging, and multimedia. Students completing this program will
earn these highly respected certifications: Cisco CCNA and CCDA and one
or more of the following: Cisco CCNP and Cisco CCDP."

Hmmm...involves NETWORKING.

Scott

Juan Jimenez wrote:

>
>
> Your reading skills suck. The certification has nothing to do with networks.
> :)

Scott[_1_]

January 24th 07, 12:33 PM

Whoa...good one. Let's see how Juan wrangles out of that one. It
should be pretty entertaining...well, maybe not.

Scott

Montblack wrote:

> ("Juan Jimenez" wrote)
>
>>I go quiet because I'm working. You go quiet because billionaire war heros
>>die on your airplanes. Guess which one is worse, boy. :)
>
>
>
> Scott Crossfield died in a Cessna 210 last year.
>
> Can you count the similarities between the two accidents, Juan?
>
> A well proven design
> A respected company
> An American hero
> Fateful decisions made by the pilot...
>
>
> Montblack
>
>

ChuckSlusarczyk

January 24th 07, 01:44 PM

In article >, Juan Jimenez says...

>Any more war heroes stupid enough to buy airplanes from you lately?

So now your saying John Walton is "stupid". I realize your tring to hurt me but
to attack the memory of a Class guy like John is beneath contempt.

I knew for a long time that you were a classless person but I found out recently
from postings on other sites that your also a racist and a bigot. Here's what
you posted:

"Better to send the white trash back to the European Ghettos and let the
hispanics fill the gap with people interested in working then whining"

White trash? Now I think we see the true picture of jaun jeminez and it isn't
pretty. Wonder what Pink Elephant will think?

Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret

"Remember the Alamo ...again"

Barnyard BOb

January 27th 07, 04:44 AM

>>Rumor mill has it, he's going to change his name to 'Ahmal'.
>>
>>After all, When you've seen jaun, you've seen ahmal.
>>
>>
>>*groan*
>
>Good one!!LOL!!
>
>Chuck S
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Hi, Nefoo Chuck.

Just dropped in to see if a certain motor mouth wannabe ever
shut his pie hole long enough to make a smoking BD-5 hole.

No joy, howsome ever.....

It's a kick to see that regardless of Jaunz bizarre machinations,
r.a.h. continues unfazed with its healthy sense of humor.

- Unka' BOb -

The more people I meet,
the more I love my dog
and George Carlin humor.

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 27th 07, 04:26 PM

It's not you. That's really all you need to know. :)

"red12049" > wrote in message
...
> Juan,
>
> Since "I" don't get to make that determination, who does?
>
>
> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
> .. .
>> No, son, you don't understand, you don't determine what is the question.
>> :)
>>
>> "red12049" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> No Juan, that ISN'T the question. Please keep your own statements
>>> straight... YOU said you could not find Mr. Hitlaw in the database, not
>>> that the one that turned up wasn't the same.
>>>
>>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
>>> .. .
>>>>
>>>> "Richard Riley" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> It's a real puzzler. I can see how that one would have stumped you.
>>>>> In the future, when you're searching a database and you don't know
>>>>> some of the search values, use a wild card or leave them blank.
>>>>
>>>> That's exactly what I did.
>>>>
>>>> The question remains, is this the same Frank Hitlaw? Director of
>>>> Maintenace at Far 129 airlines less than 10 years since he got his A&P
>>>> ticket? Sorry, but I don't buy it. :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>
>
>

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 27th 07, 04:28 PM

"Montblack" > wrote in message
...
> ("Juan Jimenez" wrote)
>>I go quiet because I'm working. You go quiet because billionaire war heros
>>die on your airplanes. Guess which one is worse, boy. :)
>
> Scott Crossfield died in a Cessna 210 last year.
>
> Can you count the similarities between the two accidents, Juan?
>
> A well proven design
> A respected company
> An American hero
> Fateful decisions made by the pilot...

You missed one. No one has died in anything I have built.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 27th 07, 04:29 PM

"BobR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
> Jaun knows better but he uses it as a weapon to attack Chuck. Its just
> another lie that he repeats over and over.

That a billionaire war hero and children's advocate died in one of Chuck's
airplanes is a lie? Who is lying now?

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 27th 07, 04:36 PM

Close to graduating with a degree in ICT and doesn't know the difference
between systems management and service management, and has not been
introduced to ITIL or its ITSM component, the defacto worldwide standard for
_service_ management, which has nothing to do with managing networks. That's
about par for what universities put out these days as an excuse for
graduates. You should be asking for a refund.

Educate yourself, kiddo. Trust me when I tell you it would behoove you to be
aware of a service management framework on which IBM, HP, Microsoft and many
other worldwide companies base their service management methodologies. If
you don't think this is important, go to monster.com, enter ITIL as a search
term and watch what comes out. As of right no less than 866 job posting
mention it and/or require it. Top it off with the fact that the federal
government will soon require it as a prerequisite to doing business (on the
basis of ISO 20000) and maybe you'll get the picture.

http://www.itil.co.uk

Juan

"Scott" > wrote in message
.. .
>I love the small print at the bottom of the Certificate..."The ITIL
>certification scheme is officially supported by" ... SCHEME...I LOVE IT!
>
> What IS I.T.? Last time I checked IT had to do with Information
> Technology (specifically, the exchange of information between computers).
> Computers exchange information over networks. How can you get a Manager's
> Certificate in IT Service Management without knowing networking?
>
> I'm attending the University of Wisconsin and am close to graduating with
> a Bachelor's in Information and Communications Technology. They also
> offer a degree in Information Technology Management (which sounds like
> your certificate). Here is a snippet from that course of study:
>
>
> "The technical curriculum in the telecommunication area focuses on
> contemporary methods of analysis, design, and telecommunication systems
> solutions. Technical courses are delivered in areas including telephony,
> networking, telecommunication policy and regulation, administration,
> video, imaging, and multimedia. Students completing this program will earn
> these highly respected certifications: Cisco CCNA and CCDA and one or more
> of the following: Cisco CCNP and Cisco CCDP."
>
> Hmmm...involves NETWORKING.
>
> Scott
>
>
>
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Your reading skills suck. The certification has nothing to do with
>> networks. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 27th 07, 04:38 PM

"ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
...
> In article >, Juan Jimenez
> says...
>>Let me refresh your memory, boy.
>>
>>This is what started it. You were shown it again several times. You have
>>admitted that you did in fact start it and you have refused, like a good
>>little ****ant coward that you are, to apologize, and now you whine like a
>>stuck pig everytime I forcefeed you your own crap with a ramrod several
>>times a month.
>>
>>http://groups.google.com/group/rec.aviation.homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/209482904328b687/63be5e18d190b5c2?lnk=st&q=Slusarczyk+toadie&rnum=1#63be5e18d190b5c2
>>
>>Any more war heroes stupid enough to buy airplanes from you lately?
>
> Yawn...Apologize for what?? calling a toady a toady??

That is why you deserve no respect, and enjoy no credibility with anyone
outside your dozen or so groupies.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 27th 07, 04:45 PM

"red12049" > wrote in message
...
> Juan,
>
> For whatever it may be worth, I read that whole thread. You posted this
> publicly, but did not explain the manner in which it relates to whatever
> may be tormenting you. I see only a 5 plus year old version of what I am
> seeing here now: Everybody insulting everybody, with you seeming to be at
> the center. What am I missing here?

Tormenting me? <guffaw!>

This is entertainment. It occupies a tiny fraction of my time, kiddo.
chucksteak is the kind of moron who goes around usenet blindly insulting and
attacking anyone associated with Jim Campbell. That's the sort of person who
deserves no respect, and gets none from anyone outside his demented gaggle
of wackos. Take Daniels, for example. Certifiable by any standard. Most of
the other ones are in the same category. The steak came real close to
admitting he was wrong and apologizing some time ago, but pulled back at the
last minute because he just couldn't bring himself to behave like a man.
That would have ended it there, but since it didn't, and he keeps engaging
in the same behaviour, I'll be yanking his chain and watching him dance for
the foreseeable future. As entertainment. :)

> As an aside, I have read most of your posts regaring the Walton crash.
> Somehow, "war hero" and "stupid" don't seem to go together, and I am sure
> the surviving family would be distressed to see him referred to in this
> manner. It also trivializes all of our military service, including yours.

Nice try, but not even close, kiddo. That's the kind of selective reading
grade-school kids use to get over on their parents. Try again some other
time. :)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 27th 07, 04:47 PM

"ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
...
> In article >, Juan Jimenez
> says...
>
>>Any more war heroes stupid enough to buy airplanes from you lately?
>
> So now your saying John Walton is "stupid".

No. You are.

I'm asking if any billionaire war heroes have made a stupid decision to buy
one your airplanes since then. Doing so would indeed be a stupid thing to
do. :)

Back to your rock, chucksteak. You have no class, no respect and no
credibility. Deal with it.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 27th 07, 04:48 PM

Oh, I'm sure it will come to you, someday.

"red12049" > wrote in message
...
> Juan,
>
> I didn't try to make "anything" of it, I simply asked you a question about
> your comment? Is there something incorrect about the procedure I
> followed?
>
>
> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
> .. .
>> Of course I brought it up, you then tried to make some comedy of it. Keep
>> your day job. :)
>>
>> "red12049" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Juan,
>>>
>>> Please read back your own posts. You brought up "Reverends", not I. I
>>> simply asked, since you brought them up, if you had a problem with them
>>> also.
>>>
>>>
>>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
>>> .. .
>>>> For trying to transpose your own problems to others, and on the basis
>>>> of "religion" at that. :)
>>>>
>>>> "red12049" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> My excuse for what, Juan?
>>>>>
>>>>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> Nah, I just ignore them. What's your excuse? :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "red12049" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> Do you have a problem with reverends, or other religious
>>>>>>> professionals?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "red12049" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>> Ummmm.... Yes, Juan, I am the judge of that, for me. And I can
>>>>>>>>> even point it out to others, so they can make their own
>>>>>>>>> judgements, for themselves. As can you. That is not a delusion
>>>>>>>>> Juan, that is life.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's what "reverends" do as well. Knock yourself out. :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>
>
>

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez[_1_]

January 27th 07, 04:49 PM

"Alphonse Le Creur" > wrote in message
.130...
> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
> :
>
>> Of course I brought it up, you then tried to make some comedy of it.
>> Keep your day job. :)
>
> Which is more than you can do, apparently.

Sorry to hurt your feelings, but I'm booked solid through April. What's your
excuse for losing your job?

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Alan Baker

January 27th 07, 07:17 PM

In article >,
"Juan Jimenez" > wrote:

> "Montblack" > wrote in message
> ...
> > ("Juan Jimenez" wrote)
> >>I go quiet because I'm working. You go quiet because billionaire war heros
> >>die on your airplanes. Guess which one is worse, boy. :)
> >
> > Scott Crossfield died in a Cessna 210 last year.
> >
> > Can you count the similarities between the two accidents, Juan?
> >
> > A well proven design
> > A respected company
> > An American hero
> > Fateful decisions made by the pilot...
>
> You missed one. No one has died in anything I have built.

Has anything you've built every been flown?

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed
the demo of the iPhone speakerphone.

BobR

January 27th 07, 07:49 PM

Thats because YOU haven't built anything. Two BD5's not finished and
a BD5J bought finished and tinkered on but never finished and flown.
Now compare that to Chucks record. You can't so don't even try.

On Jan 27, 10:28 am, "Juan Jimenez" > wrote:
> "Montblack" > wrote in ...
>
> > ("Juan Jimenez" wrote)
> >>I go quiet because I'm working. You go quiet because billionaire war heros
> >>die on your airplanes. Guess which one is worse, boy. :)
>
> > Scott Crossfield died in a Cessna 210 last year.
>
> > Can you count the similarities between the two accidents, Juan?
>
> > A well proven design
> > A respected company
> > An American hero
> > Fateful decisions made by the pilot...You missed one. No one has died in anything I have built.
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

BobR

January 27th 07, 07:53 PM

You are...and you know it. Want to try and tell Van's that everyone
who has died in one of his planes was his fault? Or maybe Cessna or
Cirrus? That is what you are stating by trying to blame Chuck for
this one. That is a low blow even for a moron like you.

On Jan 27, 10:29 am, "Juan Jimenez" > wrote:
> "BobR" > wrote in oglegroups.com...
>
> > Jaun knows better but he uses it as a weapon to attack Chuck. Its just
> > another lie that he repeats over and over.That a billionaire war hero and children's advocate died in one of Chuck's
> airplanes is a lie? Who is lying now?
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

BobR

January 27th 07, 07:59 PM

Guess the EAA must be one of his groupies since they voted him into
the Ultralight Hall of Fame. Must have been why he was selected for
that TV Program a couple years back. I could go on but you wouldn't
get the message anyway. Chuck has a thousand times more respect than
you will ever think of having. Now go kiss zooms ass, I know he
respects you for it.

On Jan 27, 10:38 am, "Juan Jimenez" > wrote:
> "ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in ...
>
> > In article >, Juan Jimenez
> > says...
> >>Let me refresh your memory, boy.
>
> >>This is what started it. You were shown it again several times. You have
> >>admitted that you did in fact start it and you have refused, like a good
> >>little ****ant coward that you are, to apologize, and now you whine like a
> >>stuck pig everytime I forcefeed you your own crap with a ramrod several
> >>times a month.
>
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/rec.aviation.homebuilt/browse_thread/t...
>
> >>Any more war heroes stupid enough to buy airplanes from you lately?
>
> > Yawn...Apologize for what?? calling a toady a toady??That is why you deserve no respect, and enjoy no credibility with anyone
> outside your dozen or so groupies.
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

BobR

January 27th 07, 08:02 PM

NO, he has never actually built anything. Even the BD5J that he has
was built by someone else.

On Jan 27, 1:17 pm, Alan Baker > wrote:
> In article >,
> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Montblack" > wrote in message
> ...
> > > ("Juan Jimenez" wrote)
> > >>I go quiet because I'm working. You go quiet because billionaire war heros
> > >>die on your airplanes. Guess which one is worse, boy. :)
>
> > > Scott Crossfield died in a Cessna 210 last year.
>
> > > Can you count the similarities between the two accidents, Juan?
>
> > > A well proven design
> > > A respected company
> > > An American hero
> > > Fateful decisions made by the pilot...
>
> > You missed one. No one has died in anything I have built.Has anything you've built every been flown?
>
> --
> "The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
> "I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed
> the demo of the iPhone speakerphone.- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -

Alan Baker

January 27th 07, 08:14 PM

In article om>,
"BobR" > wrote:

> On Jan 27, 1:17 pm, Alan Baker > wrote:
> > In article >,
> > "Juan Jimenez" > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > "Montblack" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > > > ("Juan Jimenez" wrote)
> > > >>I go quiet because I'm working. You go quiet because billionaire war
> > > >>heros
> > > >>die on your airplanes. Guess which one is worse, boy. :)
> >
> > > > Scott Crossfield died in a Cessna 210 last year.
> >
> > > > Can you count the similarities between the two accidents, Juan?
> >
> > > > A well proven design
> > > > A respected company
> > > > An American hero
> > > > Fateful decisions made by the pilot...
> >
> > > You missed one. No one has died in anything I have built.
> >
> >Has anything you've built every been flown?
>
> NO, he has never actually built anything. Even the BD5J that he has
> was built by someone else.
>

1. He may have built a desk, or a table somewhere along the way..

2. Please don't top post. It makes it harder to follow the conversation.

3. Your message had my reply attached to the last of the previous
poster's text. I had to fix it.

> >
> > --
> > "The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
> > "I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed
> > the demo of the iPhone speakerphone.- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text
> > -

4. Could you find a newsreader that knows how to snip signatures?

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed
the demo of the iPhone speakerphone.

Dan[_2_]

January 27th 07, 08:22 PM

BobR wrote:
> Thats because YOU haven't built anything. Two BD5's not finished and
> a BD5J bought finished and tinkered on but never finished and flown.
> Now compare that to Chucks record. You can't so don't even try.
>
>
Actually yawn pushes it around the floor while making jet engine noises.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Alan Baker

January 27th 07, 08:26 PM

In article >,
Richard Riley > wrote:

> On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 20:14:47 GMT, Alan Baker >
> wrote:
> >> > --
> >> > "The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully"
> >> > --
> >> > "I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed
> >> > the demo of the iPhone speakerphone.- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted
> >> > text
> >> > -
> >
> >4. Could you find a newsreader that knows how to snip signatures?
>
> Do you know of one? I haven't seen one.

Mine: MT-Newswatcher...

....for Mac OS X.

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed
the demo of the iPhone speakerphone.

Morgans

January 27th 07, 09:12 PM

"Alan Baker" > wrote

> 4. Could you find a newsreader that knows how to snip signatures?

Are you kidding? That would be WAY too much trouble, to trim all of those
lies. His computer would probably catch on fire, taking over the identity
of all of the lies he writes.
--
Jim in NC

red12049[_1_]

January 27th 07, 10:10 PM

Juan,

I have typed to you in a civilized and gentlemanly manner. I have asked
questions about points you have raised, in a genuine attempt to learn what
is going on. Ihave quoted portions of your messages, without changing any
meaning, in an attempt to keep the discussion on target. In response I get
things such as these:

Quoted from Juan:

Oh, I'm sure it will come to you, someday.

"red12049" > wrote in message
...
> Juan,
>
> I didn't try to make "anything" of it, I simply asked you a question about
> your comment? Is there something incorrect about the procedure I followed?

Quoted from Juan:

Any more war heroes stupid enough to buy airplanes from you lately?

> As an aside, I have read most of your posts regaring the Walton crash.
> Somehow, "war hero" and "stupid" don't seem to go together, and I am sure
> the surviving family would be distressed to see him referred to in this
> manner. It also trivializes all of our military service, including yours.

Nice try, but not even close, kiddo. That's the kind of selective reading
grade-school kids use to get over on their parents. Try again some other
time. :)

Quoted from Jaun:

It's not you. That's really all you need to know. :)

All the emoticons and such don't change the tone and meanings of your
replies one iota. No selective reading on my part Juan, YOU changed your
sentence re: Mr. Walton after I and Chuck called you on it. You may call
this humor, but humor is not usally consistently demeaning and insulting. I
have tried to have an intelligent and non demeaning discussion with you.
Your choice whether to continue in the same vein or not.

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
.. .
> It's not you. That's really all you need to know. :)
>
> "red12049" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Juan,
>>
>> Since "I" don't get to make that determination, who does?
>>
>>
>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
>> .. .
>>> No, son, you don't understand, you don't determine what is the question.
>>> :)
>>>
>>> "red12049" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> No Juan, that ISN'T the question. Please keep your own statements
>>>> straight... YOU said you could not find Mr. Hitlaw in the database, not
>>>> that the one that turned up wasn't the same.
>>>>
>>>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
>>>> .. .
>>>>>
>>>>> "Richard Riley" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's a real puzzler. I can see how that one would have stumped you.
>>>>>> In the future, when you're searching a database and you don't know
>>>>>> some of the search values, use a wild card or leave them blank.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's exactly what I did.
>>>>>
>>>>> The question remains, is this the same Frank Hitlaw? Director of
>>>>> Maintenace at Far 129 airlines less than 10 years since he got his A&P
>>>>> ticket? Sorry, but I don't buy it. :)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>

Alphonse Le Creur[_1_]

January 27th 07, 11:01 PM

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
:

>
> "Alphonse Le Creur" > wrote in message
> .130...
>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>> Of course I brought it up, you then tried to make some comedy of it.
>>> Keep your day job. :)
>>
>> Which is more than you can do, apparently.
>
> Sorry to hurt your feelings, but I'm booked solid through April.
> What's your excuse for losing your job?

Oh boy, another IKYABWAI.

And booked solid through april?

Bwahwahhwhahwhahwhahwhhahwhahwhahhwhahwhahwhahhwha hwhahwhhahwhahwh!

Alphonse Le Creur[_1_]

January 27th 07, 11:58 PM

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
:

>
> "ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in
> message ...
>> In article >, Juan
>> Jimenez says...
>>>Let me refresh your memory, boy.
>>>
>>>This is what started it. You were shown it again several times. You
>>>have admitted that you did in fact start it and you have refused,
>>>like a good little ****ant coward that you are, to apologize, and now
>>>you whine like a stuck pig everytime I forcefeed you your own crap
>>>with a ramrod several times a month.
>>>
>>>
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.aviation.homebuilt/browse_thread/th
>>>read/209482904328b687/63be5e18d190b5c2?
lnk=st&q=Slusarczyk+toadie&rnum
>>>=1#63be5e18d190b5c2
>>>
>>>Any more war heroes stupid enough to buy airplanes from you lately?
>>
>> Yawn...Apologize for what?? calling a toady a toady??
>
> That is why you deserve no respect, and enjoy no credibility with
> anyone outside your dozen or so groupies.
>

Wow, one could write a book on the way your mental gymnasics keep you on
your hamster wheel.

Perhaps one will.

Alphonse Le Creur[_1_]

January 28th 07, 12:00 AM

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
:

> Oh, I'm sure it will come to you, someday.

It will certainly never come to you.

And you know it, don't you?

[email protected]

January 28th 07, 12:39 AM

On Jan 27, 11:49 pm, "Juan Jimenez" > wrote:
> "Alphonse Le Creur" > wrote in messagenews:Xns98C22C38A687Fnunyfjukkinbidness@207 .14.116.130...
>
> > "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
> :
>
> >> Of course I brought it up, you then tried to make some comedy of it.
> >> Keep your day job. :)
>
> > Which is more than you can do, apparently.Sorry to hurt your feelings, but I'm booked solid through April. What's your
> excuse for losing your job?

Sounds like a quote from the zzzoom history book. In the early 90's
his answering machine would say if you are calling to book him for an
airshow he was booked through the next season.

Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

[email protected]

January 28th 07, 12:57 AM

On Jan 27, 11:47 pm, "Juan Jimenez" > wrote:
> "ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in ...
>
> > In article >, Juan Jimenez
> > says...
>
> >>Any more war heroes stupid enough to buy airplanes from you lately?
>
> > So now your saying John Walton is "stupid".No. You are.
>
> I'm asking if any billionaire war heroes have made a stupid decision to buy
> one your airplanes since then. Doing so would indeed be a stupid thing to

A really stupid decision would be to buy the piece of horse **** you
are trying to sell. You can't even start it much less fit your fat ass
into it. On the off chance you could squish you lard ass into it you
would too cowardly to fly it anyway.

Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring

> do. :)
>
> Back to your rock, chucksteak. You have no class, no respect and no
> credibility. Deal with it.
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

BobR

January 28th 07, 01:10 AM

>.All the emoticons and such don't change the tone and meanings of your
>replies one iota. No selective reading on my part Juan, YOU changed your
>sentence re: Mr. Walton after I and Chuck called you on it. You may call
>this humor, but humor is not usally consistently demeaning and insulting. I
>have tried to have an intelligent and non demeaning discussion with you.
>Your choice whether to continue in the same vein or not.

You are attempting the impossible...an intelligent and non demeaning
discussion with Jaun.

On Jan 27, 4:10 pm, "red12049" > wrote:
> Juan,
>
> I have typed to you in a civilized and gentlemanly manner. I have asked
> questions about points you have raised, in a genuine attempt to learn what
> is going on. Ihave quoted portions of your messages, without changing any
> meaning, in an attempt to keep the discussion on target. In response I get
> things such as these:
>
> Quoted from Juan:
>
> Oh, I'm sure it will come to you, someday.
>
> "red12049" > wrote in ...
>
> > Juan,
>
> > I didn't try to make "anything" of it, I simply asked you a question about
> > your comment? Is there something incorrect about the procedure I followed?Quoted from Juan:
>
> Any more war heroes stupid enough to buy airplanes from you lately?
>
> > As an aside, I have read most of your posts regaring the Walton crash.
> > Somehow, "war hero" and "stupid" don't seem to go together, and I am sure
> > the surviving family would be distressed to see him referred to in this
> > manner. It also trivializes all of our military service, including yours.Nice try, but not even close, kiddo. That's the kind of selective reading
> grade-school kids use to get over on their parents. Try again some other
> time. :)
>
> Quoted from Jaun:
>
> It's not you. That's really all you need to know. :)
>
> All the emoticons and such don't change the tone and meanings of your
> replies one iota. No selective reading on my part Juan, YOU changed your
> sentence re: Mr. Walton after I and Chuck called you on it. You may call
> this humor, but humor is not usally consistently demeaning and insulting. I
> have tried to have an intelligent and non demeaning discussion with you.
> Your choice whether to continue in the same vein or not.
>
> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in s.com...
>
>
>
> > It's not you. That's really all you need to know. :)
>
> > "red12049" > wrote in message
> ...
> >> Juan,
>
> >> Since "I" don't get to make that determination, who does?
>
> >> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
> .. .
> >>> No, son, you don't understand, you don't determine what is the question.
> >>> :)
>
> >>> "red12049" > wrote in message
> ...
> >>>> No Juan, that ISN'T the question. Please keep your own statements
> >>>> straight... YOU said you could not find Mr. Hitlaw in the database, not
> >>>> that the one that turned up wasn't the same.
>
> >>>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
> .. .
>
> >>>>> "Richard Riley" > wrote in message
> ...
>
> >>>>>> It's a real puzzler. I can see how that one would have stumped you.
> >>>>>> In the future, when you're searching a database and you don't know
> >>>>>> some of the search values, use a wild card or leave them blank.
>
> >>>>> That's exactly what I did.
>
> >>>>> The question remains, is this the same Frank Hitlaw? Director of
> >>>>> Maintenace at Far 129 airlines less than 10 years since he got his A&P
> >>>>> ticket? Sorry, but I don't buy it. :)
>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com
>
> >>> --
> >>> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com
>
> > --
> > Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -

Harry K

January 28th 07, 02:50 AM

On Jan 27, 12:22 pm, Dan > wrote:
> BobR wrote:
> > Thats because YOU haven't built anything. Two BD5's not finished and
> > a BD5J bought finished and tinkered on but never finished and flown.
> > Now compare that to Chucks record. You can't so don't even try.Actually yawn pushes it around the floor while making jet engine noises.
>
> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Really? I don't think he even knows what a jet engine sounds like.

Harry K

Alan Baker

January 28th 07, 05:26 AM

In article >,
Richard Riley > wrote:

> On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 20:26:06 GMT, Alan Baker >
> wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Do you know of one? I haven't seen one.
> >
> >Mine: MT-Newswatcher...
> >
> >...for Mac OS X.
>
> Shoulda known.

:-D

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed
the demo of the iPhone speakerphone.

ChuckSlusarczyk

January 28th 07, 06:54 PM

In article >, Barnyard BOb says...
>
>
>
>>>Rumor mill has it, he's going to change his name to 'Ahmal'.
>>>
>>>After all, When you've seen jaun, you've seen ahmal.
>>>
>>>
>>>*groan*
>>
>>Good one!!LOL!!
>>
>>Chuck S
>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Hi, Nefoo Chuck.
>
>Just dropped in to see if a certain motor mouth wannabe ever
>shut his pie hole long enough to make a smoking BD-5 hole.
>
>No joy, howsome ever.....
>
>It's a kick to see that regardless of Jaunz bizarre machinations,
>r.a.h. continues unfazed with its healthy sense of humor.
>
> - Unka' BOb -
>
Hey Unka' Bob

Nice to hear from you .The fun goes on, yawn and zoom area belly full of laughs
LOL!!
No smoking hole yet but I wouldn't hold my breath.jaun lacks the necessary
testicular fortitude to do a test flight but what he has plenty of is mouth just
like zoom.

Those two are a barrel full of laughs and what makes it funnier is they think
people take them serious LOL!!

Well it's time for some piwo and perogi stop by again.

See ya
Nefoo Chuck

Scott[_1_]

January 28th 07, 06:58 PM

Have you built ANYTHING to completion where someone COULD die in
something you built? Sounds like a challenge to me...

Scott

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> "Montblack" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>("Juan Jimenez" wrote)
>>
>>>I go quiet because I'm working. You go quiet because billionaire war heros
>>>die on your airplanes. Guess which one is worse, boy. :)
>>
>>Scott Crossfield died in a Cessna 210 last year.
>>
>>Can you count the similarities between the two accidents, Juan?
>>
>>A well proven design
>>A respected company
>>An American hero
>>Fateful decisions made by the pilot...
>
>
> You missed one. No one has died in anything I have built.
>
>
>

Scott[_1_]

January 28th 07, 07:26 PM

So, tell me what an IT Service Manager does. Spell it out. In our
company, we have an IT Manager that sets up routers, switches, etc. Has
to know how to use a computer and how to set them up to work over
networks so that information can be exchanged. Do you manage service
people at GeekSquad or do you manage people who setup and maintain
corporate networks?

The whole point of this goes back to a bunch of us (supposedly
uneducated types) who found Hitlaw in the FAA database using the
simplest of search procedures, with "no" IT knowledge of any sort and
you, the IT expert couldn't do it. How can you manage people if you
can't do the work yourself? As a manager, if you were required to fill
in for a vacation of one of your subordinates, how could you do their job?

Scott

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> Close to graduating with a degree in ICT and doesn't know the difference
> between systems management and service management, and has not been
> introduced to ITIL or its ITSM component, the defacto worldwide standard for
> _service_ management, which has nothing to do with managing networks. That's
> about par for what universities put out these days as an excuse for
> graduates. You should be asking for a refund.
>
> Educate yourself, kiddo. Trust me when I tell you it would behoove you to be
> aware of a service management framework on which IBM, HP, Microsoft and many
> other worldwide companies base their service management methodologies. If
> you don't think this is important, go to monster.com, enter ITIL as a search
> term and watch what comes out. As of right no less than 866 job posting
> mention it and/or require it. Top it off with the fact that the federal
> government will soon require it as a prerequisite to doing business (on the
> basis of ISO 20000) and maybe you'll get the picture.
>
> http://www.itil.co.uk
>
> Juan
>
> "Scott" > wrote in message
> .. .
>
>>I love the small print at the bottom of the Certificate..."The ITIL
>>certification scheme is officially supported by" ... SCHEME...I LOVE IT!
>>
>>What IS I.T.? Last time I checked IT had to do with Information
>>Technology (specifically, the exchange of information between computers).
>>Computers exchange information over networks. How can you get a Manager's
>>Certificate in IT Service Management without knowing networking?
>>
>>I'm attending the University of Wisconsin and am close to graduating with
>>a Bachelor's in Information and Communications Technology. They also
>>offer a degree in Information Technology Management (which sounds like
>>your certificate). Here is a snippet from that course of study:
>>
>>
>>"The technical curriculum in the telecommunication area focuses on
>>contemporary methods of analysis, design, and telecommunication systems
>>solutions. Technical courses are delivered in areas including telephony,
>>networking, telecommunication policy and regulation, administration,
>>video, imaging, and multimedia. Students completing this program will earn
>>these highly respected certifications: Cisco CCNA and CCDA and one or more
>>of the following: Cisco CCNP and Cisco CCDP."
>>
>>Hmmm...involves NETWORKING.
>>
>>Scott
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Your reading skills suck. The certification has nothing to do with
>>>networks. :)
>
>
>
>

Scott[_1_]

January 28th 07, 07:28 PM

What do you do after April? That's only a few months away...

Scott

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> "Alphonse Le Creur" > wrote in message
> .130...
>
>>"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
:
>>
>>
>>>Of course I brought it up, you then tried to make some comedy of it.
>>>Keep your day job. :)
>>
>>Which is more than you can do, apparently.
>
>
> Sorry to hurt your feelings, but I'm booked solid through April. What's your
> excuse for losing your job?
>
>
>

Scott[_1_]

January 28th 07, 08:09 PM

Why get a refund? I want to work with the equipment, not sit on my ass
and boss others around and take all the glory for their fine work...I
guess I got an extra dose of humility when they were handing it out.

Scott

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> Close to graduating with a degree in ICT and doesn't know the difference
> between systems management and service management, and has not been
> introduced to ITIL or its ITSM component, the defacto worldwide standard for
> _service_ management, which has nothing to do with managing networks. That's
> about par for what universities put out these days as an excuse for
> graduates. You should be asking for a refund.
>
> Educate yourself, kiddo. Trust me when I tell you it would behoove you to be
> aware of a service management framework on which IBM, HP, Microsoft and many
> other worldwide companies base their service management methodologies. If
> you don't think this is important, go to monster.com, enter ITIL as a search
> term and watch what comes out. As of right no less than 866 job posting
> mention it and/or require it. Top it off with the fact that the federal
> government will soon require it as a prerequisite to doing business (on the
> basis of ISO 20000) and maybe you'll get the picture.
>
> http://www.itil.co.uk
>
> Juan
>

ChuckSlusarczyk

January 28th 07, 08:37 PM

In article >, Juan Jimenez says...
>> Yawn...Apologize for what?? calling a toady a toady??
>
>That is why you deserve no respect, and enjoy no credibility with anyone
>outside your dozen or so groupies.

I don't want or need you to give me credibility or respect,your opinion is worth
nothing. Just for your information it took more then 12 so called rah groupies
to get me elected to the EAA Hall of Fame. So as far as respect and credibility
is concerned I have it where it counts and I'm grateful for it.
So back into the racist closet where you belong mr "we own Texas".. LOL!!!

Remember the Alamo

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret

ChuckSlusarczyk

January 28th 07, 08:42 PM

In article >, Juan Jimenez says...
>> Can you count the similarities between the two accidents, Juan?
>>
>> A well proven design
>> A respected company
>> An American hero
>> Fateful decisions made by the pilot...
>
>You missed one. No one has died in anything I have built.

You missed one...what have you ever built and flown??? I can build a model
airplane that will fly longer then your BD ,in fact I can build a model airplane
with a rubber band that can fly longer then you can keep your mouth shut :-)

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret

Robert Bonomi

January 29th 07, 07:43 AM

In article >,
Juan Jimenez > wrote:
>
>"BobR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>> Jaun knows better but he uses it as a weapon to attack Chuck. Its just
>> another lie that he repeats over and over.
>
>That a billionaire war hero and children's advocate died in one of Chuck's
>airplanes is a lie? Who is lying now?

Has anyone _survived_ a flight in a jet you built?

red12049[_1_]

January 29th 07, 11:28 AM

Juan,

Attempting to converse with someone who uses the tactics you do is
fruitless. I won't be posting anymore, but will end with this. In one of
your posts you said:

"ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
...
> In article >, Juan Jimenez
> says...
>>
>>Is that kinda like the joys of peer pressure when beloved billionaire war
>>heros die in things you build? :)
>
> The NTSB probable cause says it all my conscience is clear .But I do feel
> bad
> it happened.

Juan, Chuck never built that airplane. He supplied a kit to a buyer. And
that buyer seems to have been having problems before the fatal crash. The
following is direct from the NTSB report:

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

According to the CGS dealer, prior to accepting the completed airplane in
West Virginia, the pilot

performed several flights in the accident airplane. During one flight, the
pilot left a cordless

drill on the top of the engine prior to takeoff. During the flight, the
cordless drill fell off

the engine and contacted the composite propeller. The propeller sustained
damage, and the pilot

successfully landed the airplane without further incident. The damaged
propeller was removed and

replaced. The dealer reported the pilot, on previous flights, had "no
trouble handing the

aircraft, seemed comfortable with the aircraft."

In May 2005, the pilot departed West Virginia for Jackson, Wyoming, in the
accident airplane.

According to witnesses, the airplane landed at Cram Field Airport (BUB),
Burwell, Nebraska, to

refuel. During takeoff from BUB, a piece of luggage fell from the rear of
the airplane. The pilot

returned to the airport to retrieve the luggage. A short time later, the
pilot contacted the

witnesses and reported that he had damaged the landing gear during the
landing at BUB.

According to a friend of the pilot, the pilot stated that he did not
properly latch the flaps

during the landing at BUB. While over the runway, with the flaps set in the
full position, the

flap handle disengaged, and the flaps went to the full retracted position.
Subsequently, the

airplane landed hard on the runway damaging the landing gear and fuselage
structure. The pilot

then partially disassembled the airplane, transported the airplane via truck
to Jackson, and

performed repairs to the airplane.

After the incident in Nebraska, the kit manufacturer and the dealer offered
to personally assist

the pilot in Jackson with the repairs to the airplane; however, the pilot
declined the offer for

on-scene assistance. The pilot received a various number of new replacement
components from the

kit manufacturer. Several of the pilot's friends assisted the pilot during
various phases of the

repairs. At some point during the repairs, the pilot removed the rear
floorboard, rear control

stick, rear seat and restraint system, the nose-mounted heater, the fuselage
cover, and the gap

cover. Because the windscreen was sewn into the fuselage covering, the pilot
crafted a Lexan

windscreen and riveted it onto the fuselage structure. The pilot did not
replace the fuselage

cover, gap covers or doors after the repairs were completed. The pilot's
friends also reported

that the pilot had been using an inspection mirror to search for metal
shavings in the rectangular

cutout of the boom tube during the days preceding the accident.

The accident flight was the third flight since the hard landing in Nebraska
and subsequent repairs.

During the first flight, the pilot experienced a "tail-heavy" feeling, and
he thought that the

removal of the heater had shifted the center-of-gravity (CG). The pilot
replaced the smaller

aft-mounted (near rear seat) battery with a heavier battery, which the pilot
mounted in the nose of

the airplane. The pilot reported no further problems to friends and family
regarding a CG issue.

During the second flight, the pilot experienced an overheating engine. The
pilot removed the

engine cooling air scoops from the fuselage cover (which were originally
sewn onto the fuselage

cover), and directly attached the air scoops to the fuselage structure with
rivets. The pilot

reported no further discrepancies with the airplane to his friends.

The wreckage was released to a family representative.

The accident airplane was built and completed in May 2005 by a CGS Aviation
approved dealer located

in West Virginia, in conjunction with partial assistance by the pilot. The
airplane building

records and logbooks were not obtained. According to the dealer and
acquaintances of the pilot,

the airplane had accumulated approximately 45 hours at the time of the
accident.

The accident airplane was eligible for certification in the experimental
light-sport aircraft

category. According to CFR Part 21.191(i)(1), after January 31, 2008, an
experimental certificate

would not be issued for the accident airplane. The airplane was not eligible
for certification in

the ultralight category due to a fuel capacity of greater than 10 gallons.
According to the kit

manufacturer and dealer, the pilot had intended on registering the airplane
with the FAA; however,

he had not completed the process at the time of the accident.

The cause of the acident, according to the NTSB is as follows:

The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of
this accident as follows:

The loss of airplane pitch control resulting from the pilot/owner's improper
reinstallation of the rear locking collar on the elevator control torque
tube, which allowed the torque tube to move rearward during flight and
loosen the elevator control cable tension.

Juan, that airplane is no more Chuck's than a 32 Ford hotrod is still a
Ford.

And yes, Juan, I stand by my statement:

"red12049" > wrote in message
...
> Juan,
>
> For whatever it may be worth, I read that whole thread. You posted this
> publicly, but did not explain the manner in which it relates to whatever
> may be tormenting you. I see only a 5 plus year old version of what I am
> seeing here now: Everybody insulting everybody, with you seeming to be at
> the center. What am I missing here?

Tormenting me? <guffaw!>

This is entertainment. It occupies a tiny fraction of my time, kiddo.
chucksteak is the kind of moron who goes around usenet blindly insulting and
attacking anyone associated with Jim Campbell. That's the sort of person who
deserves no respect, and gets none from anyone outside his demented gaggle
of wackos. Take Daniels, for example. Certifiable by any standard. Most of
the other ones are in the same category. The steak came real close to
admitting he was wrong and apologizing some time ago, but pulled back at the
last minute because he just couldn't bring himself to behave like a man.
That would have ended it there, but since it didn't, and he keeps engaging
in the same behaviour, I'll be yanking his chain and watching him dance for
the foreseeable future. As entertainment. :)

And this is why:

"ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
...
> In article >, Juan Jimenez
> says...
>>Let me refresh your memory, boy.
>>
>>This is what started it. You were shown it again several times. You have
>>admitted that you did in fact start it and you have refused, like a good
>>little ****ant coward that you are, to apologize, and now you whine like a
>>stuck pig everytime I forcefeed you your own crap with a ramrod several
>>times a month.
>>
>>http://groups.google.com/group/rec.aviation.homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/209482904328b687/63be5e18d190b5c2?lnk=st&q=Slusarczyk+toadie&rnum=1#63be5e18d190b5c2
>>
>>Any more war heroes stupid enough to buy airplanes from you lately?
>
> Yawn...Apologize for what?? calling a toady a toady??

That is why you deserve no respect, and enjoy no credibility with anyone
outside your dozen or so groupies.

Anyone that would purposefully destroy their own reputation in ANY venue,
even one such as this, for the purpose YOU stated above, has deviated from
normal human behavior. And before you come back with a retort about me,
please remember that you know NOTHING about my background. Anything you
might post from this point forward about Chuck's airplanes, or about me for
that matter, is subject to being viewed as lies and innuendo for no
discernable purpose other than salving your own torment.

And yes Juan, we know you don't care. You only do it for
"entertainment"....So "entertain" away.

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
.. .
> Oh, I'm sure it will come to you, someday.
>
> "red12049" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Juan,
>>
>> I didn't try to make "anything" of it, I simply asked you a question
>> about your comment? Is there something incorrect about the procedure I
>> followed?
>>
>>
>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
>> .. .
>>> Of course I brought it up, you then tried to make some comedy of it.
>>> Keep your day job. :)
>>>
>>> "red12049" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Juan,
>>>>
>>>> Please read back your own posts. You brought up "Reverends", not I. I
>>>> simply asked, since you brought them up, if you had a problem with them
>>>> also.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
>>>> .. .
>>>>> For trying to transpose your own problems to others, and on the basis
>>>>> of "religion" at that. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> "red12049" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> My excuse for what, Juan?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> Nah, I just ignore them. What's your excuse? :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "red12049" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>> Do you have a problem with reverends, or other religious
>>>>>>>> professionals?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "red12049" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>> Ummmm.... Yes, Juan, I am the judge of that, for me. And I can
>>>>>>>>>> even point it out to others, so they can make their own
>>>>>>>>>> judgements, for themselves. As can you. That is not a delusion
>>>>>>>>>> Juan, that is life.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That's what "reverends" do as well. Knock yourself out. :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>

DABEAR

January 29th 07, 02:42 PM

Juan Jimenez wrote:

>Take Daniels, for example. Certifiable by any standard.

Actually Juan, I'm not the one running around telling lies about
people, like you and your "mental" mentor, James R. "Captain Zoom"
Campbell:

Captain Zoom's latest complaint per his established Modus Operandi:

Please be advised that my name is Jim Campbell, Editor-In-Chief of
the
Aero-News Network and an internationally syndicated journalist. A
Mark
Daniels, the publisher of a site currently hosted by you, using the
domain of www.waterworkscase.com has been stalking myself, my company
and
a number of other persons from the aerospace industry for a fair
amount
of time.
If you look at the site in question, it will not take you long to see
that we have been dealing with a disturbed and obsessed personality
that
may pose an extreme danger to myself and others. He is currently
under
investigation for threats in which "bombs and guns" were supposed to
be
used to settle a score he feels against Mike Houghton, the head of
the
Reno Air Races.
He has threatened myself and a number of associates demanding
personal
information, publication of this latest manifesto, and other bizarre
actions. He has promised to publish my personal information,
including
banking and credit card records in order to create harm to myself. He
has
already posted my driver's license records in apparent violation of
Florida Law. He has threatened me with death and other forms of
punishment
for failing to publish his demands in the past. He has a number of
other sites dedicated to perpetrating his agenda, threatening those
with
whom he finds fault, rife with accusations of undocumented/unproven/
false
criminal behavior against some highly respected members of the
aerospace community, including XPrize founder Dr. Peter Diamandis.
On a less important but possibly more immediately actionable note,
this
person has stolen numerous photographs form the Aero-News Network,
which are our copyrighted property and has republished them without
permission and despite numerous orders to desist.
The guy has been hard to track down, having recently fled California
to
a location in Colorado where we are now attempting to seek legal
protection. As you may know, this is a slow process, and until we can
get
some relief, we feel ourselves to be at risk with each day. We demand
that
the site be taken down as a hazard to the lives and well-being of
myself, my staff, my family and my associates. We have real concerns
that
this man is capable of acting in a harmful manner and that such sites
only give rise to his fantasies of self-importance and the only
arbiter of
what is truthful about a number of subjects... despite the lack of
any
supporting evidence.
Further; the theft of our copyrighted property, the publication of my
personal information (in violation of law) show a clear dispensation
toward illegal behavior that can be allowable under your terms of
services. We strongly recommend that the site be eliminated from your
service
in order to ease the harm we may be subjected to and to avoid the
liability that your company may undertake through your the potential
refusal
to act, now that you have been officially notified of our concerns. I
would welcome contact with your organization at any time to discuss
this
matter. You may reach my personal forwarding number 24/7 at
800-356-7767 and I assure you that we would not alert you to these
matters if we
did not feel that the situation was very serious and requiring your
immediate intervention.

James Richard Campbell
Editor-In-Chief, Aero-News Network, Inc.
800-356-7767
Thank you,

hostmonster.com

Remember, folks: this is from the "Internationally Syndicated
Journalist," Captain Zoom!

LOL!!!

Here's my response for the time being. We'll be responding shortly in
Federal Court, but have to wait a few days for a move to Dallas. We
have a family emergency there and are postponing our Colorado plans.
We'll be in the Dallas Ft. Worth area near Kaufmann or Scurry, Texas
as it stands:

This is a copy of the ticket I just sent...I was in the hospital
between January 19th and last night, the 26th, and could not respond
until now...BRDB!!!

This is in regards to the shutdown of my websites from January 20,
2007, to January 26, 2007.
The charges made by Mr. James R. Campbell are false and improperly
filed under DMCA, which Mr. Campbell is known to be familiar with.
Mr. Campbell filed a DMCA complaint previously chalked with Federally-
punishable perjury, got caught in his perjury, was publicly exposed
for it and is attempting to avoid the proper filing of a DMCA
complaint to avoid multiple charges of perjury once again.
Mr. Campbell has attempted to circumvent the Law by avoiding DMCA in
his complaint, under which he must swear under penalty of perjury
(Federal) that what he says is true.
None of my websites should have been shut down based on an "e-mail"
with unproven statements that cannot be proven because they are
untrue.
In regards to the issues raised by Mr. Campbell in his complaint:
"Please be advised that my name is Jim Campbell, Editor-In-Chief of
the
Aero-News Network and an internationally syndicated journalist."
Mr. Campbell has been previously diagnosed with Narcissistic
Personality Disorder. SEE NTSB SE-4661 file attached or at:
http://www.ousterhout.net/zoom/se-4661.txt
Campbell has an inflated view of himself as an "internationally
syndicated journalist." To the best of our knowledge and belief, Mr.
Campbell is not in syndication. Yahoo linking to his stories does not
constitute syndication.
Frankly, he is not a journalist as journalists are not allowed to lie
to their readers or others. Included among his lifetime of lying,
Campbell has impersonated doctors SEE Link below:
http://www.ousterhout.net/zoom/tulsa.html
....and pilots for Japan Air Lines. Campbell has claimed to be a
wounded "Purple Heart" Vietnam Veteran. Campbell has claimed to have
been at My Lai and that the CIA was chasing him. A review of NTSB
SE-4661 at:
http://www.ousterhout.net/zoom/se-4661.txt
....has Mr. Campbell himself, debunking his own myth, indicating he was
never in Vietnam. I am a 100% service connected disabled veteran and
this is an issue very important to Vietnam Veterans in particular, and
myself, a veteran of eight years of honorable service post-Vietnam
(after Vietnam). The issue is known as "Stolen Valor" and Mr.
Campbell is well documented in the Federal Public Record (NTSB
SE-4661) as guilty of the charge.
"A Mark Daniels, the publisher of a site currently hosted by you,
using the domain of www.waterworkscase.com has been stalking myself,
my company and a number of other persons from the aerospace industry
for a fair amount
of time."
Mr. Campbell fails to provide names of those he claims that I am
stalking so that a number can be arrived at and stories verified. He
fails to provide dates, incidents, witnesses, etc. This is an
established Modus Operandi with Mr. Campbell.
Mr. Campbell's word has been given too much credibility by your
organization, particularly since he failed to file a proper DMCA
complaint with sworn oath. That failure to follow DMCA should have
raised red flags right away.
A review of www.ousterhout.net will give you a good feel for Mr.
Campbell's lack of credibility and also will raise the issue of
"others" hurt by Campbell in the process of his publishing. Click on
the links to "Jim Campbell" and/or "Captain Zoom."

"If you look at the site in question, it will not take you long to
see
that we have been dealing with a disturbed and obsessed personality
that may pose an extreme danger to myself and others. He is currently
under investigation for threats in which "bombs and guns" were
supposed to be used to settle a score he feels against Mike Houghton,
the head of the
Reno Air Races."
The website www.waterworkscase.com is an expose involving issues of
fraud, Civil Rights Violations and racketeering. I do not need to use
"bombs and guns" in regards to settling this affair. I have not
threatened the use of "bombs and guns." I do not know whom Mr.
Campbell is attributing this quote to and if such a threat was in
existence, you would think that Mr. Campbell or others would have
filed it by now. At present, I have not been contacted by any
investigators in regards to any such threats, therefore, Mr. Campbell
needs to provide proof that a complaint was filed to Law Enforcement.
Again, the issue is Mr. Campbell's lack of credibility.
"He has threatened myself and a number of associates demanding
personal
information,"
I have threatened no one. I have only imparted the knowledge that
legal action will be taken, an impartation that is required by Law in
California. By imparting the knowledge, the Courts' belief is that
the other individual has the opportunity to change their minds about
their actions and avoid lawsuit, something that burdens the time of an
already busy judicial system.
"publication of this latest manifesto,"
What manifesto? I have issued no manifesto. I have had no
communications with Mr. Campbell in well over a year.
If I did issue a "manifesto," I could publish the document at my own
websites. I would lose credibility if I published at Campbell's
operation. Would you please forward the document that Mr. Campbell is
referring to so that I can be enlightened?
"and other bizarre
actions."
What bizarre actions? Coming from a man who has committed Federal
Perjury in the filing of a DMCA complaint, and now tries to propigate
more lies by circumventing DMCA, I would have my concerns in regards
to believing him, especially when one reads:
http://www.ousterhout.net/zoom/se-4661.txt
Would you please forward a list of the bizzare actions cited by Mr.
Campbell?
"He has promised to publish my personal information, including
banking and credit card records in order to create harm to myself."
I have made no such statement. A review of the Court cases at
Ousterhout.Net would indicate he has no credit cards, considering
those he has cheated in the past.
Would you please forward a copy of any such alleged statement that Mr.
Campbell refers to, purportedly made by me?
"He has already posted my driver's license records in apparent
violation of Florida Law."
Would you please forward a copy of the Law Mr. Campbell is referring
to and be advised, that the information we published that has been
taken down under protest and which we would like to put back up
immediately, is public record, has been disemminated over the internet
for almost the past five years, was publicly posted by Sun 'N Fun at
their Air Show event in 2002 so that their Security could identify Mr.
Campbell and have him removed from their facilities. Mr. Campbell has
accused by them of stalking, harassment, breach of contract with the
vendor "The Boys and Girls Club of America" over alleged non-paymnet
for services rendered at one of his Air Show parties, attempting to
entrap event officials into nuissance lawsuits, false police reports,
trespassing, etc. All this can be found at
www.ousterhout.net
We are also informed and believe that Mr. Campbell has already been
rebuffed by a Florida Court on this very issue.
Please do note at www.ousterhout.net that much of what Mr. Campbell
alleges against myself and others he is in actuality, guilty of
himself. Campbell is also alleged to have initiated a Secret Service
complaint against an enemy involving a threat against the President of
the United States. Campbell is believed to have initiated threats
against himself, then claim others were threatening him.

"He has threatened me with death and other forms of punishment
for failing to publish his demands in the past."
I have made no demands of Mr. Campbell in the past and we have the
documentation to back that up as well. I have not threatened Mr.
Campbell or any other with death. The Law is the only punishment,
should Mr. Campbell or others be found guilty as charged. Mr.
Campbell needs to be exposed to and punished by the legal system. Mr.
Campbell's Narcissism comes to the forefront when he thinks himself so
important that he would allege that people want to kill him, injure
him, want him dead, whatever.
Mr. Campbell is not that important. We are concentrating on him at
this time due to his lack of credibility and the finding of his thirty
year history of mental illness, which includes schizophrenia, and
numerous acts of criminal misconduct. Truly, when you see Mr.
Campbell's record at Ousterhout.Net, which was prepared LONG before I
learned of Mr. Campbell's misdeeds, you will wonder about his leanings
towards crime, versus that which he alleges against me near the end of
his false complaint.
By the way, when we published said documentation (e-mail exchanges
between Campbell and I from over a year ago) refuting Mr. Campbell's
claims ~ particularly in his own words ~ Mr. Campbell filed his first
DMCA complaint and shut us down to cover up and avoid exposure.
Campbell committed substantial Federal Perjury when he did, and that
case has been subsequently supported in our favor by discovery of Mr.
Campbell's thirty year history of mental illness and criminal
misconduct, all outlined at www.ousterhout.net and elsewhere.
"He has a number of other sites dedicated to perpetrating his agenda,"
Our agenda is news reporting. My websites include Aviation & Marine
USA, Silver State News Service, Centennial State News Service, Topaz
State News Service, Lone Star State News Service, et al. We publish
under and are protected by the First Amendment, Copyright Law and
Section 107, Fair Use, among others. Section 107 states:
"TITLE 17--COPYRIGHTS
CHAPTER 1--SUBJECT MATTER AND SCOPE OF COPYRIGHT
Sec. 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair
use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in
copies
or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for
purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching
(including
multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not
an
infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a
work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered
shall
include--
(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such
use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational
purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in
relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value
of the copyrighted work.

The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of
fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above
factors.
(Pub. L. 94-553, title I, Sec. 101, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2546;
Pub.
L. 101-650, title VI, Sec. 607, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5132; Pub. L.
102-492, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3145.)"
We investigate cases as necessary under our duties and
responsibilities per the First Amendment in support of the "Public's
Right To Know" and as a Public Watchdog. Had Mr. Campbell mentioned
the websites, he would have lost credibility just by their very
names. Only my news and Editorial sites have any interest in Mr.
Campbell, and though we are concentrating on him at this moment due to
that aforementioned thirty year history of mental illness and criminal
misconduct, he is but a small cog in the overall case. In the end,
Mr. Campbell is not that important, but his lack of credibility and
prior involvement in fraud is, not to mention, those with whom he
associates and their histories.
"threatening those with whom he finds fault,"
We do not threaten, we only impart knowledge of the actions we can and
will lawfully take.
"rife with accusations of undocumented/unproven/false
criminal behavior against some highly respected members of the
aerospace community, including X Prize founder Dr. Peter Diamandis."
This statement is false as can be seen by NTSB SE-4661 at:
http://www.ousterhout.net/zoom/se-4661.txt
Mr. Campbell is not the authority on whom can or cannot be respected
in this world. The evidence exists despite Mr. Campbell's smoke and
mirror sping that it does not. The evidence has been on the internet
for decades and was there long before I knew of Campbell's misconduct
myself.
Mr. Campbell is also an agent of Dr. Diamandis, having been selected
by Dr. Diamandis to fly one of his "rocket racers" in the Rocket
Racing League. I believe his operations to be fraudulent. Mr.
Campbell receives perks and benefits from Dr. Diamandis and has a
conflict of interest in not revealing the truth of his relationship
with Dr. Diamandis, which can be found at:
www.rocketracingleague.com
http://www.rocketracingleague.com/pilot_jim_campbell.html
http://www.rocketracingleague.com/company_leadership-team.html
http://www.rocketracingleague.com/bio_jim-campbell.html
....under "Bio," "Pilots" and Advisory Board.
Such a shame Mr. Campbell omitted this conflict of interest in regards
to his complaint. My Conflict of Interest in his regard is listed
towards the top of the page at
www.waterworkscase.com
No "ifs, ands or buts" about it.
When you review NTSB Report SE-4661 and the other information
regarding Mr. Campbell at
www.ousterhout.net
....you will soon see why I question Diamandis and his association with
frauds like Campbell. I question Dr. Diamandis' pilot selection
process, seeing how the mentally ill Mr. Campbell got through it. Mr.
Campbell has laid claims which we believe are false, to piloting
experience which we believe he does not possess. Dr. Diamandis has
laid or made claims about "Rocket Racing" that are highly
questionable. For example, the racers are not under rocket power, but
rather, only gliding after the engines have shut off, therefore, how
are they "rocket racers?" They are depicted in artist's concept as
low to the ground in competition, when in fact, their altitudes during
the event will be so high that they may not be seen by the human eye
and must be watched on television. Who wants to travel around the
World to sit down and watch an event on television?
The Public will spend money going into one of Dr. Diamandis' events.
Will they get their moneys' worth, or will they be defrauded. That is
an issue of Editorial, criticism, critique, covered under Section 107,
Fair Use.
As a "Journalist," Mr. Campbell should know this. Yet, he publishes
nothing in dissent, only goes behind the scenes to shut other
publications, his dissenters and his enemies down.

"On a less important but possibly more immediately actionable note,
this
person has stolen numerous photographs form the Aero-News Network,
which are our copyrighted property and has republished them without
permission and despite numerous orders to desist."
This is a bald-faced lie. A review of the Rocket Racing League
website shows where I obtained the images from, which I am entitled to
use under Section 102 of the Copyright Act, Fair Use, Editorial,
Criticism, Critique. There is no mention of Aero-News having
copyright over the images.
The images were not taken from the Aero-News Network website. Again,
my use of the images are protected under Section 102, Fair Use, of the
Copyright Act under Editorial use. Mr. Campbell has been well aware
of this for years, the information being published at another
dissenting website,

www.ousterhout.net
....for over a decade.
Additionally, we cite the case Online Policy Group vs Diebold, in
which a Court indicates that Copyright violation does not occur when
materials published are in the Public Interest and Public Good via the
exposing of misconduct of another/other parties. That case can also
be found on the internet at:
http://www.phillipsnizer.com/library/internetlib_subject.cfm?
TopicID=22
"The guy has been hard to track down, having recently fled California
to
a location in Colorado where we are now attempting to seek legal
protection."
Fled? Track down? I have no criminal charges filed against me
anywhere that I am aware of. I have no knowledge of any
investigations being underway as claimed by Mr. Campbell. The move to
Colorado was to assist my mother in building her place in Cotopaxi,
Colorado. My current address and telephone number is listed at a
number of my websites. However, be advised, we have a family
emergency in Texas and will shortly be moving there. My mother's
eighty year old sister is seriously ill, as is her daughter, my
cousin. My mother is going there to assist them and I will be setting
up Regional Headquarters for the South in that location. The address
will then change to the area around Dallas, once new housing has been
acquired. The move is to occur on February 2-3, 2007.
"As you may know, this is a slow process, and until we can get
some relief, we feel ourselves to be at risk with each day."
The process might be quicker if he had made contact by e-mail, seeing
as how my e-mail address hasn't changed, or if he had looked over my
other "numerous" websites he claims I have, to find the address, such
as the one that exists at:
www.centennialstatenews.com which covers Colorado, the place Mr.
Campbell claims I have fled to. Kind of strange, fleeing somewhere,
like you were under threat of legal action, then announcing where
exactly you are...

"We demand that the site be taken down as a hazard to the lives and
well-being of myself, my staff, my family and my associates."
The site is expose and contains no threats. The materials, much of
which are Public Record and/or permitted use by Ousterhout.Net and
others, have been in publication for years, including those published
by Mr. Campbell himself in his faux journalistic endeavors or on
USENET and/or in e-mails, letters and fax's.
If Mr. Campbell had any real concern over his safety, why did he
commit these crimes and misdeeds in the first place? No one I know or
know of wants the man dead. They want him in prison, where he
belongs.

"We have real concerns that
this man is capable of acting in a harmful manner and that such sites
only give rise to his fantasies of self-importance and the only
arbiter of what is truthful about a number of subjects... despite the
lack of any
supporting evidence."
Again, I refer you to NTSB SE-4661 and Dr. Thomas Powers' testimony in
regards to Mr. Campbell's Narcissistic Personality Disorder. I also
refer you to the comment "despite the lack of any supporting
evidence," which is rebutted by www.ousterhout.net, USENET and
www.waterworkscase.com, plus other documentation we're still trying to
get installed on the new website.
Mr. Campbell alleges what he is most guilty of.

"Further; the theft of our copyrighted property, the publication of
my
personal information (in violation of law) show a clear dispensation
toward illegal behavior that can be allowable under your terms of
services."
Not when I can quote the Law and Mr. Campbell cannot. In that regard,
Mr. Campbell tries to hide the truth with generic statements not
supported by the facts.
"We strongly recommend that the site be eliminated from your service
in order to ease the harm we may be subjected to and to avoid the
liability that your company may undertake through your the potential
refusal to act, now that you have been officially notified of our
concerns."
You have just been threatened by Mr. Campbell, as have so many
others. You are being exploited by Mr. Campbell in his attempts at
cover up and blocking the Public from knowing the Truth about him and
those he associates with.
Please SEE:
"A Guide For The Zoomed" at:
http://www.wanttaja.com/zguide.htm
This is Mr. Ron Wanttaja's website and he too, has been "Zoomed" by
James R. "Captain Zoom" Campbell, and provides information as to
whether or not Jim "Zoom" Campbell will actually sue, especially since
both you and I (and Mr. Campbell) all know that you have no liability
in this matter over what I publish Editorially.
Again, Mr. Campbell's attempt here is to circumvent DMCA to avoid
additional counts of Federal Perjury. This should not be allowed. My
sites should not have been shut down with just an e-mail. DMCA is
Law. The procedure is Law. The issue becomes one of Due Process and
the Law having precedence over private contracts under Severability.
You protect yourselves by having a complainant file a proper DMCA
complaint. Go back and have Mr. Campbell file a proper DMCA complaint
with the charges included as he initially stated them and as they are
quoted here.
See if he commits to more Perjury...

"I would welcome contact with your organization at any time to discuss
this matter. You may reach my personal forwarding number 24/7 at
800-356-7767"
Due to Mr. Campbell's credibility factor of "Zero," all communications
with him should be by the book, in writing, per DMCA.

"and I assure you that we would not alert you to these matters if we
did not feel that the situation was very serious and requiring your
immediate intervention."
Since you are not Law Enforcement ~ why is he treating you as such as
opposed to actually filing criminal complaints?
How about the fact that he lies...
Use caution in your dealings with Mr. Campbell. Verbal communications
are only something he will lie about, unless you take good notes,
which are of course, admissable in a Court of Law. Even then, he will
try to lie his way out of a bad situation, thus documented evidence
and writings should be mandatory, especially in regards to DMCA
issues.
My position is that DMCA has precedence over Terms of Service. If TOS
are in conflict with DMCA, the wiser move is to force the DMCA
complaint so that the complainant must swear an oath under Penalty of
Federal Perjury. Those that are lying, may balk, as Mr. Campbell has
done with his latest complaint by avoiding and circumventing any
mention of DMCA.
You took this individual's word without him committing to a sworn oath
under Federal Perjury Laws that what he was saying was true. You shut
down all my websites as a result and that has caused me harm,
particularly, since I was hospitalized with Bilateral Pulmonary
Embolism (Blood Clotting of the Lungs) at the time, when Mr. Campbell
filed his false complaint.
We are not interested in suing you whatsoever. We have no intention
of suing you. Yours is a minor mistake that will work towards our
advantage against Mr. Campbell in Court when that time comes. Too
many others have made this same mistake with him. So there will be no
lawsuit. Your tech support responded expeditiously in putting the
sites back up when we agreed to the removal, under protest to Mr.
Campbell which will be addressed in our Criminal and Civil Actions
against him. Your people in Tech Support have been attentive to the
issues we rose and suggested we contact you with a complaint of our
own against Mr. Campbell.
We wish to put the DMV information back up and ~ per suggestion by
your Tech Support ~ are making contact (e-mail sent initialy earlier
today) with the Florida DMV as we speak to confirm what we know, and
that's the issue of the DMV information, dated April 10, 2002, being
Public Record and publishable, not to mention. already disemminated
over the internet and protected by the First Amendment.
We request the documented information and any notes about what you
were told by Mr. Campbell if you spoke with him over the telephone.
We strongly recommend that you review the information at the
Ousterhout and Wanttaja websites.
Mr. Campbell is not what he makes himself out to be. He's gotten away
with it for thirty years. We will go to Court shortly to see that he
is dealt with by the Law and his misconduct brought to an immediate
end.
We request clarification as to the alleged "Copyrighted" photos as the
only offensive material mentioned by your Tech Support was the DMV
flyer.
We want to ensure a good relationship with you. We will deal with Mr.
Campbell and his criminal history in a Court of Law. We only seek to
bring the guilty to justice, not the innocent.

Please notify me immediately if the attached files (below) do not
transmit to you. I will copy and paste and send on notepad via e-
mail.
Best Regards,
Mark S. "Bear" Daniels
Publisher
ILIPS Group
www.ilips.net

~~~~~

I'm preparing Federal complaints at this time against the cowards
James R. Campbell and Juan Jimenez at this time.

All their charges are denied in their entirety.

Hey! Do Campbell's charges look familiar to anyone!? <G>

If brains were dynamite, these two boyz wouldn't have enough
collectively to blow one of their noses with! LOL!!!

Campbell apparently filed an injunction against the server, which is
why my websites are once again shut down. We'll get the move to Texas
done and you're loking at the future owner of his own server.
Campbell's trying to avoid me like the plague, so he's attempting to
leave me out of the litigation by claiming he doesn't know my
location, though it's posted at a number of my websites.

We'll go to Court and take the fight to him now...anyone care to
testify about being "Zoomed?" Looking for witnesses that want Justice
served like crow for the eating in Jim Campbell's regard.

We're supposed to have a decision some time today in regards to the
shutdown, however, this server was only temporary anyway. Having
one's own server forces complainants to 1) Obey the guidelines of
Federal Law under the DMCA and 2) serve the owner and the one they
should truly be complaining about or to...

I wonder if Jimbo will leave his forwarding service number for me when
he complains! His possession of such a service should tell everyone
about just how many folks he has victimized over the past thirty
years. His reign of Narcissim is about over...

Montblack

January 29th 07, 06:56 PM

("Juan Jimenez" wrote)
> That a billionaire war hero and children's advocate died in one of Chuck's
> airplanes is a lie? Who is lying now?

Juan, your smear campaign should also include:

Red Wing Boots
Levi's Blue Jeans
Wal-Mart socks
Columbia jackets...

From: Good Morning Vietnam (1987)

Whoa, there, Dick. Put the brakes on. I wanted to wait till the airman left
to talk with you. Uh, Dick, I'm transferring you.

Transferring me, sir?

Mm-hmm.

Where to, sir?

You're going to Guam.

Guam, sir! There's nothin' goin' on in Guam! Why Guam?

Dick, I've covered for you a lot of times 'cause I thought you was a little
crazy.

But you're not crazy. You're mean. And this is just radio.

Montblack
http://www.script-o-rama.com/movie-transcripts-a.html

Dan[_2_]

January 29th 07, 08:54 PM

Harry K wrote:
>
> On Jan 27, 12:22 pm, Dan > wrote:
>> BobR wrote:
>>> Thats because YOU haven't built anything. Two BD5's not finished and
>>> a BD5J bought finished and tinkered on but never finished and flown.
>>> Now compare that to Chucks record. You can't so don't even try.Actually yawn pushes it around the floor while making jet engine noises.
>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>
> Really? I don't think he even knows what a jet engine sounds like.
>
> Harry K
>
He says "zoom, zoom."

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

ChuckSlusarczyk

January 29th 07, 09:02 PM

In article . com>, DABEAR
says...Major snip

>We'll go to Court and take the fight to him now...anyone care to
>testify about being "Zoomed?" Looking for witnesses that want Justice
>served like crow for the eating in Jim Campbell's regard.

I would gladly testify as to how I got "zoomed" and I'll bring my ducks :-)

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret

Roger[_4_]

January 30th 07, 02:37 AM

On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:54:49 -0600, Dan > wrote:

>Harry K wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 27, 12:22 pm, Dan > wrote:
>>> BobR wrote:
>>>> Thats because YOU haven't built anything. Two BD5's not finished and
>>>> a BD5J bought finished and tinkered on but never finished and flown.
>>>> Now compare that to Chucks record. You can't so don't even try.Actually yawn pushes it around the floor while making jet engine noises.
>>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>>
>> Really? I don't think he even knows what a jet engine sounds like.
>>
>> Harry K
>>
>He says "zoom, zoom."

I always thought they sounded like a big hot air leak...er ...never
mind.

>
>Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com

ChuckSlusarczyk

January 30th 07, 01:24 PM

In article . com>, DABEAR
says...
>
>Captain Zoom's latest complaint per his established Modus Operandi:

>zoom says:

>Please be advised that my name is Jim Campbell, Editor-In-Chief of
>the
>Aero-News Network and an internationally syndicated journalist.

Usual self puffing can you be considered "syndicated" if all you have is a web
site?

> has been stalking myself, my company and
>a number of other persons from the aerospace industry for a fair
>amount of time.

The term "Stalking" and some vague victims and vague time span. A good start to
a zoom rant.

>If you look at the site in question, it will not take you long to see
>that we have been dealing with a disturbed and obsessed personality
>that
>may pose an extreme danger to myself and others.

Kettle ,pot black. Typical zoomer.

> He is currently
>under
>investigation for threats in which "bombs and guns" were supposed to
>be
>used to settle a score he feels against Mike Houghton, the head of
>the
>Reno Air Races.

Threats ,bombs and guns. He's setting a good pace and hitting all the usual
terms.Vintage zoom.

>He has threatened myself and a number of associates demanding
>personal
>information, publication of this latest manifesto, and other bizarre
>actions.

More threats and terms like manifesto and bizarre. Manifesto is a rarely used
zoom term ,extra credit for innovation :-)

> He has promised to publish my personal information,
>including
>banking and credit card records in order to create harm to myself.

Hmm as if zoom has never done that to other people.If good for goose etc.He's
hitting his stride.

>He has
>already posted my driver's license records in apparent violation of
>Florida Law.

Key word here is "apparent" zoom knows it isn't a violation of Florida law but
implys it might be. almost full speed.

> He has threatened me with death and other forms of
>punishment
>for failing to publish his demands in the past.

More threats and now punishment.He's on a roll.

>He has a number of
>other sites dedicated to perpetrating his agenda, threatening those
>with
>whom he finds fault, rife with accusations of undocumented/unproven/
>false
>criminal behavior against some highly respected members of the
>aerospace community, including XPrize founder Dr. Peter Diamandis.

More threats and finally a name. I love the term "undocumented/ unproven/false
criminal behavior". Terms used against zoomie all the time LOL!! Boy he's in
fine form now.LOL!!

>On a less important but possibly more immediately actionable note,
>this

"Actionable" first time this showed up in this rant.He slightly altering course
and hitting afterburner.

>person has stolen numerous photographs form the Aero-News Network,

Ahha "stolen " my God this might be a record event in the making he has really
hit his stride now .Everybody steals from him.Getting close to boilerplate zoom
but with enough variables to make it interesting.

>which are our copyrighted property and has republished them without
>permission and despite numerous orders to desist.

Good stuff but used many times before.Maybe he's tiring in the stretch.

>"having recently fled California "

if you move your fleeing in zooms world .Kinda like jaun fleeing to PR LOL!!

> we feel ourselves to be at risk with each day. We demand
>that
>the site be taken down as a hazard to the lives and well-being of
>myself, my staff, my family and my associates.

Used to be myself,my staff,my wife, my dog but the same crap .Starting to slow
down and lose stride.

>only give rise to his fantasies of self-importance and the only
>arbiter of
>what is truthful about a number of subjects... despite the lack of
>any
>supporting evidence.

ROTFL!! Kettle ,pot ,black.Might be getting his second wind.

>" to avoid the
>liability that your company may undertake through your the potential
>refusal
>to act,"

He's closing in for the kill he just gave the first indication of a veiled
threat to the provider.More vintage zoom. Shoukd be going for the finish.

> now that you have been officially notified of our concerns

"Officially notified" not just a phonecall but an official notification. I
wouldn't have expected any less from the zoomster LOL!!He just coasted past the
finish all out of steam....

Snip some blah,blah ,blah.

Well...This was a tough one to judge accurately because it contained a lot of
the usual terms such as:

"Stalking, Vagueness, accusing others of being disturbed, Extreme
danger,investigations,bombs and guns,Threats, Bizzare actions, Violation of law,
death threats, criminal behavior, Actionable, stolen property, copyrighted,
Liability and finally the always present Offical notification".

It was pretty good in as far as he didn't miss anything however it's all been
used before. It was good entertainment but wasn't anything new. So on the Billy
Bob rating system I'd give it a 8.5 ,might have given it a 9 if he said "Govern
yourself accordingly" but he didn't .

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret

DABEAR

January 30th 07, 02:11 PM

On Jan 30, 6:24 am, ChuckSlusarczyk
> wrote:
> In article . com>, DABEAR
> says...
>
>
>
> >Captain Zoom's latest complaint per his established Modus Operandi:
> >zoom says:

ROTFLMAO!!!

Yeah, like I said...any of those charges look familar to anyone!? LOL
Cubed!!!