Re: Licenses for 10.2?

[Michael Baldwin, Bruce]

Phil Kyle wrote:
> ah > verbally sodomised in
> :
>
> > Phil Kyle wrote:
> >> Craig Oldfield > verbally sodomised in
> >> :
> >>
> >>> In article >,
> >>> says...
> >>>
> >>>> I think the point has been missed. The cost of having each by a copy
> >>>> is not an issue. The issue is that each need to buy a copy or
> >>>> download a copy. The process is to have one master copy from which
> >>>> all install dvds are made. This is to insure that all installs are
> >>>> identical with identical versions and builds of all software. QA has
> >>>> to stamp all dvds
> >>>
> >>> It seems you don't want an answer, why don't you just find something
> >>> that fits your license requirements and buy it rather than whining on?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Because then you'd have nothing to whine about.
> >>
> >
> > Pardon, but the froup is called "alt.os.linux.suse"
> >
> > Thx.
>
> Why would you want to sue them anyway?

They are desperately seeking suse.

> --
> Phil Kyle™
>
> T
> h i
> i s
> s l
> f i l
> S o n o
> i u e n
> g r s g