Michael Baldwin, Bruce
February 7th 07, 06:45 AM
On Feb 3, 9:34 pm, Bruce AKA the alleged jmalloy
> wrote:
> tholeled nonsense:
>
> > At least this time you didn't stupidly deny having written "Tholeln"
> > in a subject line prior to a particular date, Malloy.
>
> Ah, Tholeln, what do you know? Answer: nothing, as usual. I deny
> having written "Tholeln" in a subject line prior to a particular date,
> Tholeln. And to answer your querulous objection in advance, prove the
> date is the one of those I have in mind, Tholeln.
Dickless has no mind, Bruce.
> > Of course,
> > you're the one who likes to portray himself as someone who doesn't
> > know what he's talking about:
>
> Oh, but I *do* know what I'm talking about, Tholen, unlike certain
> people to whom I am responding at the moment, Tholen. But thanks for lying!
Dickless is a known liar, Bruce.
> > Still waiting for a response to
>
> ...Q's supplied with A's -- by himself. Go figure.
I'd rather not, Bruce.
> wrote:
> tholeled nonsense:
>
> > At least this time you didn't stupidly deny having written "Tholeln"
> > in a subject line prior to a particular date, Malloy.
>
> Ah, Tholeln, what do you know? Answer: nothing, as usual. I deny
> having written "Tholeln" in a subject line prior to a particular date,
> Tholeln. And to answer your querulous objection in advance, prove the
> date is the one of those I have in mind, Tholeln.
Dickless has no mind, Bruce.
> > Of course,
> > you're the one who likes to portray himself as someone who doesn't
> > know what he's talking about:
>
> Oh, but I *do* know what I'm talking about, Tholen, unlike certain
> people to whom I am responding at the moment, Tholen. But thanks for lying!
Dickless is a known liar, Bruce.
> > Still waiting for a response to
>
> ...Q's supplied with A's -- by himself. Go figure.
I'd rather not, Bruce.