Re: Vangaurd Explorer I launch Jan 31, 1958 exlaunch1958.jpg

[Peter Hucker]

On Sat, 04 Nov 2006 22:31:18 -0000, Dave Kearton > wrote:

> Peter Hucker wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:07:16 -0000, Dave Kearton
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Alan Erskine wrote:
>>>> > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> As for the size, I post them as I find them and I WILL NOT BE
>>>>> REDUCING the size to suit you no matter how much you complain. So
>>>>> if you don't like them, write a filter not load them or to just
>>>>> delete them.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not suggesting that you reduce the size; just post the image in
>>>> one piece. It's easy enough to do.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It's highly likely that J3's server has a maximum message size of
>>> 600K. When Ozemail was into binaries, it's size was 500K, the
>>> putsch I'm using now has a better size at 1300K.
>>>
>>>
>>> Certainly you can set the message sizes larger - or unlimited - but
>>> if the original server rejects them as too big, nobody sees them.
>>
>> I've never seen a server with a limit of lesss than 1MB. My current
>> one is 10MB.
>
>
>
>
>
> Alright smart guy, post a 10mb message here (or in alt.test) I'll wait.

In alt.test, subject "10MB test - 9748.jpg"


--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

Never dive into deep concrete.

[Dave Kearton]

Peter Hucker wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Nov 2006 22:31:18 -0000, Dave Kearton
> > wrote:
>
>> Peter Hucker wrote:
>>> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:07:16 -0000, Dave Kearton
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alan Erskine wrote:
>>>>> > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> As for the size, I post them as I find them and I WILL NOT BE
>>>>>> REDUCING the size to suit you no matter how much you complain.
>>>>>> So if you don't like them, write a filter not load them or to
>>>>>> just delete them.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not suggesting that you reduce the size; just post the image
>>>>> in one piece. It's easy enough to do.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It's highly likely that J3's server has a maximum message size of
>>>> 600K. When Ozemail was into binaries, it's size was 500K, the
>>>> putsch I'm using now has a better size at 1300K.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Certainly you can set the message sizes larger - or unlimited - but
>>>> if the original server rejects them as too big, nobody sees them.
>>>
>>> I've never seen a server with a limit of lesss than 1MB. My current
>>> one is 10MB.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Alright smart guy, post a 10mb message here (or in alt.test) I'll
>> wait.
>
> In alt.test, subject "10MB test - 9748.jpg"



Haven't seen it yet on the 3 servers that I subscribe to, the real test is
to send it from J3's account.




--

Cheers

Dave Kearton

[Peter Hucker]

On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 22:41:14 -0000, Dave Kearton > wrote:

> Peter Hucker wrote:
>> On Sat, 04 Nov 2006 22:31:18 -0000, Dave Kearton
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Peter Hucker wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:07:16 -0000, Dave Kearton
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Alan Erskine wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It's highly likely that J3's server has a maximum message size of
>>>>> 600K. When Ozemail was into binaries, it's size was 500K, the
>>>>> putsch I'm using now has a better size at 1300K.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Certainly you can set the message sizes larger - or unlimited - but
>>>>> if the original server rejects them as too big, nobody sees them.
>>>>
>>>> I've never seen a server with a limit of lesss than 1MB. My current
>>>> one is 10MB.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Alright smart guy, post a 10mb message here (or in alt.test) I'll
>>> wait.
>>
>> In alt.test, subject "10MB test - 9748.jpg"
>
>
>
> Haven't seen it yet on the 3 servers that I subscribe to, the real test is
> to send it from J3's account.

If you can't see it, you're using servers that don't do big messages. I wouldn't put up with a server like that.

--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

What is the first thing a blonde learns when she takes driving lessons?
You can also sit upright in a car.

[Dave Kearton]

Peter Hucker wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 22:41:14 -0000, Dave Kearton
> > wrote:
>
>> Peter Hucker wrote:
>>> On Sat, 04 Nov 2006 22:31:18 -0000, Dave Kearton
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Peter Hucker wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:07:16 -0000, Dave Kearton
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Alan Erskine wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's highly likely that J3's server has a maximum message size of
>>>>>> 600K. When Ozemail was into binaries, it's size was 500K, the
>>>>>> putsch I'm using now has a better size at 1300K.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Certainly you can set the message sizes larger - or unlimited -
>>>>>> but if the original server rejects them as too big, nobody sees
>>>>>> them.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've never seen a server with a limit of lesss than 1MB. My
>>>>> current one is 10MB.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Alright smart guy, post a 10mb message here (or in alt.test)
>>>> I'll wait.
>>>
>>> In alt.test, subject "10MB test - 9748.jpg"
>>
>>
>>
>> Haven't seen it yet on the 3 servers that I subscribe to, the real
>> test is to send it from J3's account.
>
> If you can't see it, you're using servers that don't do big messages.
> I wouldn't put up with a server like that.



....or yours hasn't passed it on, we have no guarantee that your server
acepted it. Nobody else has seen it.


Either way, to me it's no loss.



--

Cheers

Dave Kearton

[Peter Hucker]

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 21:04:28 -0000, Dave Kearton > wrote:

> Peter Hucker wrote:
>> On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 22:41:14 -0000, Dave Kearton
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Peter Hucker wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 04 Nov 2006 22:31:18 -0000, Dave Kearton
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Peter Hucker wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Alright smart guy, post a 10mb message here (or in alt.test)
>>>>> I'll wait.
>>>>
>>>> In alt.test, subject "10MB test - 9748.jpg"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Haven't seen it yet on the 3 servers that I subscribe to, the real
>>> test is to send it from J3's account.
>>
>> If you can't see it, you're using servers that don't do big messages.
>> I wouldn't put up with a server like that.
>
>
>
> ...or yours hasn't passed it on, we have no guarantee that your server
> acepted it. Nobody else has seen it.
>
>
> Either way, to me it's no loss.

My server has accepted it, as I can see it and redownload it.

--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

I dialed one of those 900 numbers to get some financial advice. They advised me not to dial 900 numbers.