Log in

View Full Version : See if you have what it takes to be a pilot !!!


Dave Kearton
January 4th 07, 09:51 PM
Can you focus on the parrot for 10 seconds ?

§qu@r3 Wh33£s
January 4th 07, 10:33 PM
On this day of this month, in a year likely to be unrecorded in human
history, Dave Kearton wrote:

>
> Can you focus on the parrot for 10 seconds ?


Uhm, what parrot.....?

I see a pair uh _______, but no parrot.


--
Half of the harm that is done in this world is due to people who want to
feel important. They don't mean to do harm but the harm does not interest
them.

-T.S. Eliot, poet (1888-1965)

§qu@r3 Wh33£s
January 4th 07, 10:33 PM
On this day of this month, in a year likely to be unrecorded in human
history, Dave Kearton wrote:

>
> Can you focus on the parrot for 10 seconds ?


Uhm, what parrot.....?

I see a pair uh _______, but no parrot.


--
Half of the harm that is done in this world is due to people who want to
feel important. They don't mean to do harm but the harm does not interest
them.

-T.S. Eliot, poet (1888-1965)

No Name
January 4th 07, 10:41 PM
You must be a newbie to I-net porn. That is a camel-toe pic although I
prefer to call it a pussy-toe.
I have cats, not camels in my house. The "Lolita" code word in the upper
right corner usually denotes underage, i.e kittens not pussies. Geezers
like us should be looking for MILF pictures. (Mothers I'd Love to ****)

"Dave Kearton" > wrote in message
...
>
>
>
> Can you focus on the parrot for 10 seconds ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

No Name
January 4th 07, 10:41 PM
You must be a newbie to I-net porn. That is a camel-toe pic although I
prefer to call it a pussy-toe.
I have cats, not camels in my house. The "Lolita" code word in the upper
right corner usually denotes underage, i.e kittens not pussies. Geezers
like us should be looking for MILF pictures. (Mothers I'd Love to ****)

"Dave Kearton" > wrote in message
...
>
>
>
> Can you focus on the parrot for 10 seconds ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Mitchell Holman
January 4th 07, 10:48 PM
"Dave Kearton" > wrote in news:oFenh.965
:

>
>
>
> Can you focus on the parrot for 10 seconds ?
>


Can you focus on the Dragons wing for five seconds?

Mitchell Holman
January 4th 07, 10:48 PM
"Dave Kearton" > wrote in news:oFenh.965
:

>
>
>
> Can you focus on the parrot for 10 seconds ?
>


Can you focus on the Dragons wing for five seconds?

Dave Kearton
January 4th 07, 11:11 PM
wrote:
> You must be a newbie to I-net porn. That is a camel-toe pic although I
> prefer to call it a pussy-toe.
> I have cats, not camels in my house. The "Lolita" code word in the
> upper right corner usually denotes underage, i.e kittens not pussies.
> Geezers like us should be looking for MILF pictures. (Mothers I'd
> Love to ****)
>
>


Thanks for the clue. If I'd known it was related to under age porn, it
would have been shredded as soon as it appeared in the inbox.




--

Cheers

Dave Kearton

Dave Kearton
January 4th 07, 11:11 PM
wrote:
> You must be a newbie to I-net porn. That is a camel-toe pic although I
> prefer to call it a pussy-toe.
> I have cats, not camels in my house. The "Lolita" code word in the
> upper right corner usually denotes underage, i.e kittens not pussies.
> Geezers like us should be looking for MILF pictures. (Mothers I'd
> Love to ****)
>
>


Thanks for the clue. If I'd known it was related to under age porn, it
would have been shredded as soon as it appeared in the inbox.




--

Cheers

Dave Kearton

Dutch
January 4th 07, 11:40 PM
"Dave Kearton" > wrote in message
...
>
>
>
> Can you focus on the parrot for 10 seconds ?
>

What parrot ?

"Dutch"

Dutch
January 4th 07, 11:40 PM
"Dave Kearton" > wrote in message
...
>
>
>
> Can you focus on the parrot for 10 seconds ?
>

What parrot ?

"Dutch"

Luke
January 5th 07, 02:09 AM
"Dave Kearton" > wrote in message
...
> wrote:
> > You must be a newbie to I-net porn. That is a camel-toe pic although I
> > prefer to call it a pussy-toe.
> > I have cats, not camels in my house. The "Lolita" code word in the
> > upper right corner usually denotes underage, i.e kittens not pussies.
> > Geezers like us should be looking for MILF pictures. (Mothers I'd
> > Love to ****)
> >
> >
>
>
> Thanks for the clue. If I'd known it was related to under age porn, it
> would have been shredded as soon as it appeared in the inbox.


Don't sweat the underage allegation. The word 'Lolita' may be used to
invoke the impression that the models are young, but the copyright owner is
a US registered dotcom, and as such, the owners are easily tracked down. No
one is stupid enough to put thier address on a picture of a young lady that
does not have proof of 18 or over on file.


Luke

Luke
January 5th 07, 02:09 AM
"Dave Kearton" > wrote in message
...
> wrote:
> > You must be a newbie to I-net porn. That is a camel-toe pic although I
> > prefer to call it a pussy-toe.
> > I have cats, not camels in my house. The "Lolita" code word in the
> > upper right corner usually denotes underage, i.e kittens not pussies.
> > Geezers like us should be looking for MILF pictures. (Mothers I'd
> > Love to ****)
> >
> >
>
>
> Thanks for the clue. If I'd known it was related to under age porn, it
> would have been shredded as soon as it appeared in the inbox.


Don't sweat the underage allegation. The word 'Lolita' may be used to
invoke the impression that the models are young, but the copyright owner is
a US registered dotcom, and as such, the owners are easily tracked down. No
one is stupid enough to put thier address on a picture of a young lady that
does not have proof of 18 or over on file.


Luke

Alan Erskine
January 5th 07, 02:29 AM
"Dave Kearton" > wrote in message
...
>
>
>
> Can you focus on the parrot for 10 seconds ?

Oh my god; I could be a pilot. <tears>


--
Alan Erskine

Alan Erskine
January 5th 07, 02:29 AM
"Dave Kearton" > wrote in message
...
>
>
>
> Can you focus on the parrot for 10 seconds ?

Oh my god; I could be a pilot. <tears>


--
Alan Erskine

Dave Kearton
January 5th 07, 02:34 AM
Alan Erskine wrote:
> "Dave Kearton" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>>
>>
>> Can you focus on the parrot for 10 seconds ?
>
> Oh my god; I could be a pilot. <tears>



OK - without looking at the picture ........



.....what were the flap settings ?



--

Cheers

Dave Kearton

Dave Kearton
January 5th 07, 02:34 AM
Alan Erskine wrote:
> "Dave Kearton" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>>
>>
>> Can you focus on the parrot for 10 seconds ?
>
> Oh my god; I could be a pilot. <tears>



OK - without looking at the picture ........



.....what were the flap settings ?



--

Cheers

Dave Kearton

No Name
January 5th 07, 02:40 AM
"Luke" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Dave Kearton" > wrote in message
> ...
> > wrote:
> > > You must be a newbie to I-net porn. That is a camel-toe pic although I
> > > prefer to call it a pussy-toe.
> > > I have cats, not camels in my house. The "Lolita" code word in the
> > > upper right corner usually denotes underage, i.e kittens not pussies.
> > > Geezers like us should be looking for MILF pictures. (Mothers I'd
> > > Love to ****)
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > Thanks for the clue. If I'd known it was related to under age porn,
it
> > would have been shredded as soon as it appeared in the inbox.
>
>
> Don't sweat the underage allegation. The word 'Lolita' may be used to
> invoke the impression that the models are young, but the copyright owner
is
> a US registered dotcom, and as such, the owners are easily tracked down.
No
> one is stupid enough to put thier address on a picture of a young lady
that
> does not have proof of 18 or over on file.
>
>
> Luke
>
I agree, "Lolita" is an advertising gimmick, and the label is no real proof
of anything. The picture itself is obviously not of a pre-teen or child.

No Name
January 5th 07, 02:40 AM
"Luke" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Dave Kearton" > wrote in message
> ...
> > wrote:
> > > You must be a newbie to I-net porn. That is a camel-toe pic although I
> > > prefer to call it a pussy-toe.
> > > I have cats, not camels in my house. The "Lolita" code word in the
> > > upper right corner usually denotes underage, i.e kittens not pussies.
> > > Geezers like us should be looking for MILF pictures. (Mothers I'd
> > > Love to ****)
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > Thanks for the clue. If I'd known it was related to under age porn,
it
> > would have been shredded as soon as it appeared in the inbox.
>
>
> Don't sweat the underage allegation. The word 'Lolita' may be used to
> invoke the impression that the models are young, but the copyright owner
is
> a US registered dotcom, and as such, the owners are easily tracked down.
No
> one is stupid enough to put thier address on a picture of a young lady
that
> does not have proof of 18 or over on file.
>
>
> Luke
>
I agree, "Lolita" is an advertising gimmick, and the label is no real proof
of anything. The picture itself is obviously not of a pre-teen or child.

Jon Anderson
January 5th 07, 03:26 AM
Alan Erskine wrote:

> Oh my god; I could be a pilot. <tears>

Well I just saved myself the cost of some expensive lessons.... <G>


Jon

Jon Anderson[_2_]
January 5th 07, 03:26 AM
Alan Erskine wrote:

> Oh my god; I could be a pilot. <tears>

Well I just saved myself the cost of some expensive lessons.... <G>


Jon

John Lloyd
January 7th 07, 09:10 AM
§qu@r3 Wh33£s > wrote in news:Jgfnh.560095$R63.387291
@pd7urf1no:

> On this day of this month, in a year likely to be unrecorded in human
> history, Dave Kearton wrote:
>
>>
>> Can you focus on the parrot for 10 seconds ?
>
>
> Uhm, what parrot.....?
>
> I see a pair uh _______, but no parrot.
>
>

Where's the rest of the camel, guys?

John Lloyd
January 7th 07, 09:10 AM
§qu@r3 Wh33£s > wrote in news:Jgfnh.560095$R63.387291
@pd7urf1no:

> On this day of this month, in a year likely to be unrecorded in human
> history, Dave Kearton wrote:
>
>>
>> Can you focus on the parrot for 10 seconds ?
>
>
> Uhm, what parrot.....?
>
> I see a pair uh _______, but no parrot.
>
>

Where's the rest of the camel, guys?

MaXiLeeCH
January 7th 07, 09:59 AM
"John Lloyd" > wrote in message
. 145...
> §qu@r3 Wh33£s > wrote in news:Jgfnh.560095$R63.387291
> @pd7urf1no:
>
>> On this day of this month, in a year likely to be unrecorded in human
>> history, Dave Kearton wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Can you focus on the parrot for 10 seconds ?
>>
>>
>> Uhm, what parrot.....?
>>
>> I see a pair uh _______, but no parrot.
>>
>>
>
> Where's the rest of the camel, guys?

Who cares???? :)


Jeff C.

MaXiLeeCH
January 7th 07, 09:59 AM
"John Lloyd" > wrote in message
. 145...
> §qu@r3 Wh33£s > wrote in news:Jgfnh.560095$R63.387291
> @pd7urf1no:
>
>> On this day of this month, in a year likely to be unrecorded in human
>> history, Dave Kearton wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Can you focus on the parrot for 10 seconds ?
>>
>>
>> Uhm, what parrot.....?
>>
>> I see a pair uh _______, but no parrot.
>>
>>
>
> Where's the rest of the camel, guys?

Who cares???? :)


Jeff C.

Google