View Full Version : Planes On Poles - Bakersfield CA F84 2.jpg (1/1)
Mitchell Holman
January 17th 07, 03:11 AM
mat
January 17th 07, 06:13 AM
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 21:11:01 -0600, Mitchell Holman
> wrote:
Unusual F-84 --- one of two made with turboprops.....
XF-84H
Two F-84Fs were converted into experimental aircraft. Each was fitted
with a Allison XT40-A-1 turboprop engine of 5,850 shaft horsepower
(4,365 kW) driving a supersonic propeller. Ground crews dubbed the
XF-84H, the Thunderscreech due to its extreme noise level.[1]
mat
January 17th 07, 06:13 AM
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 21:11:01 -0600, Mitchell Holman
> wrote:
Unusual F-84 --- one of two made with turboprops.....
XF-84H
Two F-84Fs were converted into experimental aircraft. Each was fitted
with a Allison XT40-A-1 turboprop engine of 5,850 shaft horsepower
(4,365 kW) driving a supersonic propeller. Ground crews dubbed the
XF-84H, the Thunderscreech due to its extreme noise level.[1]
Mechanical Menace
January 17th 07, 11:11 AM
mat wrote in :
> On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 21:11:01 -0600, Mitchell Holman
> > wrote:
>
>
> Unusual F-84 --- one of two made with turboprops.....
>
>
> XF-84H
> Two F-84Fs were converted into experimental aircraft. Each was fitted
> with a Allison XT40-A-1 turboprop engine of 5,850 shaft horsepower
> (4,365 kW) driving a supersonic propeller. Ground crews dubbed the
> XF-84H, the Thunderscreech due to its extreme noise level.[1]
>
>
>
Thunderscreech!!
Made a sound that nausiated the pilots and crews.
Great phenomenon!
Cheers,
Dennis
Mechanical Menace
January 17th 07, 11:11 AM
mat wrote in :
> On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 21:11:01 -0600, Mitchell Holman
> > wrote:
>
>
> Unusual F-84 --- one of two made with turboprops.....
>
>
> XF-84H
> Two F-84Fs were converted into experimental aircraft. Each was fitted
> with a Allison XT40-A-1 turboprop engine of 5,850 shaft horsepower
> (4,365 kW) driving a supersonic propeller. Ground crews dubbed the
> XF-84H, the Thunderscreech due to its extreme noise level.[1]
>
>
>
Thunderscreech!!
Made a sound that nausiated the pilots and crews.
Great phenomenon!
Cheers,
Dennis
January 19th 07, 02:31 AM
On 17-Jan-2007, Mechanical Menace > wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 21:11:01 -0600, Mitchell Holman
> > > wrote:
> >
> >
> > Unusual F-84 --- one of two made with turboprops.....
> >
> >
> > XF-84H
> > Two F-84Fs were converted into experimental aircraft. Each was fitted
> > with a Allison XT40-A-1 turboprop engine of 5,850 shaft horsepower
> > (4,365 kW) driving a supersonic propeller. Ground crews dubbed the
> > XF-84H, the Thunderscreech due to its extreme noise level.[1]
> >
> >
> >
>
> Thunderscreech!!
>
> Made a sound that nausiated the pilots and crews.
> Great phenomenon!
>
> Cheers,
Good idea that proved wrong, The plane actually had worse performance than
the straight jet.
January 19th 07, 02:31 AM
On 17-Jan-2007, Mechanical Menace > wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 21:11:01 -0600, Mitchell Holman
> > > wrote:
> >
> >
> > Unusual F-84 --- one of two made with turboprops.....
> >
> >
> > XF-84H
> > Two F-84Fs were converted into experimental aircraft. Each was fitted
> > with a Allison XT40-A-1 turboprop engine of 5,850 shaft horsepower
> > (4,365 kW) driving a supersonic propeller. Ground crews dubbed the
> > XF-84H, the Thunderscreech due to its extreme noise level.[1]
> >
> >
> >
>
> Thunderscreech!!
>
> Made a sound that nausiated the pilots and crews.
> Great phenomenon!
>
> Cheers,
Good idea that proved wrong, The plane actually had worse performance than
the straight jet.
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.