Big John Bites Dicks (Security Clearance)

[Badwater Bill]

>
>I haven't gone to the archives and looked at prior activities of BWB
>but if they match what has shown up on r.a.h. lately and what others
>have said about him, then I can get his clearances pulled if they are
>still active.
>
>I'm not making threats, just pointing out what can be done in the
>system.
>
>In this PC world today, it is easy to cut someone out of the pattern.
>
>
>Big John

"I can get his clearances pulled if they are still active."

"I"m not making threats, just pointing out what can be done in the
system." ----Great sentence for a typical lame brain Nazi.

Don't you love it? Some annonymous prick struts in with his gut
retracted, and his chest standing out and threatens to take away a
man's livelihood. This is the kind of pond scum that I hated in the
government. While the President of the United States, gets blow jobs
in the White House, some little prick like this coward is turned lose
on me and my staff. This is the kind of cocksucker who would send you
to to concentration camp if you had an uncle that was a Jew. The
world is full of them.

Johnny Ammeter mentions some stuff above about why I hated having a
clearance. This prick here is why I hated having a clearance. This
jack-off is like taking a minority who has been picked on his whole
life and giving him a badge. This is exactly the kind of prick that
the security forces of ALL governments are loaded with. This jack-off
probably can't fly, most likely has no formal education and probably
retired as an NCO at an E-4 or E-5. You notice he doesn't say he was
a pilot in the Air Force. But he puts that tag on himself here
because this is an airplane group and he assumes it will lend a bit of
credibility to his dishonorable ass. Give a prick like this an inch
and he'll take a mile. He'll **** with a full colonel just because he
can, and he's jealous enough to be motivated to do it.

This prick is the type of little root-worm who walks around a guys
neighborhood asking all of the neighbors how much he drinks and what
his character is all about. Then he writes a report that ****s the
subject out of his clearance...and submits that report on a Friday
just before he himself goes out to a gay bar and sucks someone's dick
or ****s his daughter.

I'd like to meet you in real life, you ****ing coward. God how I'd
love to meet a muther ****er like you. You better hope I never find
out who you are.

Anybody know who this asshole is? Email me and tell me. I may make
him my hobby and hunt him down like an animal.

"I can get his clearances pulled if they are still active."

You go do it, you jack off. You go and do it. I'll see you in Hell.

BWB

[Paul Dowgewicz]

Here's the Security Abuse Item of the Day

http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/2003-08-06-janitor_x.htm

A janitor had his clearance revoked because he declared bankruptcy 19
years ago.

Why don't we just remove blue and green from the terror alert levels?
We'll never go there as long as the people who decide the level are the
same ones who would lose their power if the level were lowered.

[Ron Wanttaja]

On Wed, 06 Aug 2003 22:28:18 -0400, Paul Dowgewicz >
wrote:

>Here's the Security Abuse Item of the Day
>
>http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/2003-08-06-janitor_x.htm
>
>A janitor had his clearance revoked because he declared bankruptcy 19
>years ago.

I've heard a lot of anecdotal stories along this one. One guy got turned
down, and raised a fuss. Turned out he'd had the nickname "Klepto" in
grade school. For stealing apples from a tree on the way home...the name
was short for "Apple Kleptomaniac"

My favorite story is about a guy who was filling out his applications, and
came across the question: "Have you or any member of your family ever taken
any action to subvert or overthrow the government of the United States?"

He thought for a moment, then answered, "yes."

Incredibly, the security investigators missed it. The last bureaucratic
who had to sign off on the papers noticed it, and raised a huge stink. The
applicant was brought into the office, and they demanded to know why he
answered "yes" to that question.

"Because my great-grandpappy fought for the South in the War Between the
States."

The story goes that they subsequently inserted the word, "immediate" before
"family."

I got interviewed for a friend's clearance a couple of months back. They
asked me if I knew whether he had contacts in the news media.

"Yes," I said, "me!"

Ron wanttaja

[pac plyer]

Big John > wrote
>
> This doesn't make much sense with the filter deleted parts but don't
> have to listen/read any filth and trashing by a nut case.
>
>
> Big John

Yeah Big John,

Sorry to be the one to tell you this, but IMHO you're going to miss a
lot that way. Just my observation from lurking here since 95'

Just because you've got a civilian scientist behaving badly is no
reason to seal-off the base and issue the "go-code." (Dr.
StrangeWater for example) You can still protect your "bodily fluids"
without going critical.

Ever listen to gangster wrap?... the crap has taken over the world.
Every other word is profane. They blast that crap everywhere but
Singapore and Mainland China. It's a different world now for you and
me and we're just going to have to adapt.

Just don't agitate Dr. StrangeWater, and you two might become friends
in about 200 years. Sorry if some of this cracks me up, but I've been
watching a lot of Peter Sellers movies lately.

Cheers,

pacplyer
ex MAC mo-fo
(supplemental)

[Snowbird]

(Mike Gaspard) wrote in message >...

Would you gents mind changing the Subject: line? Evidently
the target couldn't care less, but I find it somewhat unbecoming
to propegate ill natured personal attacks on a veteran of our armed
forces. Especially foul-mouthed attacks which complain of
behavior the attacker has previously indulged in himself
(threatening to get someone fired on the basis of newsgroup
posts, which of course is not what happened here just what's
being complained of as best I can tell. FWIW)

> I knew a guy when I was in the Air Force that got his clearance
> yanked. Some O.S.I. agents were doing a routine (supposedly) security
> check on the Data Processing Center where he worked, and asked if he
> knew of any weaknesses in the system. So he says, "Oh sure, I could
> trash this thing so bad you wouldn't believe it".
>
> Boom. Goodbye clearance.

Well, there may be more basis to it, but it wouldn't surprise me.

In one of Feynman's books he describes how he identified a security
breach, where he could obtain the last number of the secure file
drawer combinations if the drawer was left open. He reported it
along with suggestions to fix the problem. The result was a memo
to everyone that they had to write a report and change their
combination if Feynman entered their office. Yeah, that fixed
the problem.

Cheers,
Sydney

[Big John]

Sydney

In the Nuc business there are very strict codes that have to be
followed both in the office AND OUT. Any deviation from what is
considered normal is subject to close scrutiny and if true out you go.
Safety is paramount and crazy behavior is a key item that will get you
booted.

It's even stricter than the PC 'race card' that we see exploited so
often now days.

Some of the rants I've seen here, if the individual is still active in
the Nuc business, would get him thrown out.

With Home Land Security added on, things are getting tighter than a
drum head.

Nuff said.


Big John

Things that may be written about me, don't worry Sydney.

1. Have a lot filtered now and can filter more.
2. Have broad shoulders and can carry the weight of the world on them
(like I have in the past).


On 7 Aug 2003 20:25:14 -0700, (Snowbird)
wrote:

(Mike Gaspard) wrote in message >...
>
>Would you gents mind changing the Subject: line? Evidently
>the target couldn't care less, but I find it somewhat unbecoming
>to propegate ill natured personal attacks on a veteran of our armed
>forces. Especially foul-mouthed attacks which complain of
>behavior the attacker has previously indulged in himself
>(threatening to get someone fired on the basis of newsgroup
>posts, which of course is not what happened here just what's
>being complained of as best I can tell. FWIW)
>
>> I knew a guy when I was in the Air Force that got his clearance
>> yanked. Some O.S.I. agents were doing a routine (supposedly) security
>> check on the Data Processing Center where he worked, and asked if he
>> knew of any weaknesses in the system. So he says, "Oh sure, I could
>> trash this thing so bad you wouldn't believe it".
>>
>> Boom. Goodbye clearance.
>
>Well, there may be more basis to it, but it wouldn't surprise me.
>
>In one of Feynman's books he describes how he identified a security
>breach, where he could obtain the last number of the secure file
>drawer combinations if the drawer was left open. He reported it
>along with suggestions to fix the problem. The result was a memo
>to everyone that they had to write a report and change their
>combination if Feynman entered their office. Yeah, that fixed
>the problem.
>
>Cheers,
>Sydney

[Ron Wanttaja]

On 7 Aug 2003 20:25:14 -0700, (Snowbird) wrote:

>
>Would you gents mind changing the Subject: line?

While I agree with you (and usually change the subject line myself), lately
we've been getting a batch of folks who complain when you do that....

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 00:45:28 -0500, Big John > wrote:

]In the Nuc business there are very strict codes that have to be
]followed both in the office AND OUT. Any deviation from what is
]considered normal is subject to close scrutiny and if true out you go.
]Safety is paramount and crazy behavior is a key item that will get you
]booted.

Wasn't just nuke programs...had the same sort of thing ('Human Reliability
Program') while I was in ADCOM. Monitor your co-worker, report if he or
she starts acting funny, has marital problems, shows unexplained wealth,
etc. Oddly enough, the fact that a batch of us lieutenants all owned
fairly late model sports cars (Corvettes, Porsches, Trans-Ams, etc.) seemed
to be considered normal. :-)

I always think of the Alistair MacLean quote: "There are prisons in
America and cushy hotels in Moscow filled with people who had top security
clearances...." At some point, you just have to trust people.

In all honesty, I *really* pity the poor security folks nowadays. Thirty
years ago, they had to worry that someone would contact the Russians and
obtain a tiny camera which would allow them to shoot five or six grainy,
poorly-exposed photos of classified documents. Nowadays, you can go online
and buy a watch with a built-in USB storage system (including the
connecting cable, which tucks into the band) and walk home with hundreds of
classified documents invisibly strapped onto your wrist.

http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/watches/5eec/

Twenty years ago, we couldn't bring calculators with memories into the work
areas (I once had a security officer pick up a calculator I was using and
ask, "Is that a classified number?"). Today, most engineering and
management types are wedded to their PDAs, and the security guys either
have to allow them in or cripple the true work.

No. I wouldn't want to be a security officer.

Ron Wanttaja

[Michael Pilla]

"Ron Wanttaja" > wrote in message
...
SNIP
> In all honesty, I *really* pity the poor security folks nowadays. Thirty
> years ago, they had to worry that someone would contact the Russians and
> obtain a tiny camera which would allow them to shoot five or six grainy,
> poorly-exposed photos of classified documents. Nowadays, you can go
online
> and buy a watch with a built-in USB storage system (including the
> connecting cable, which tucks into the band) and walk home with hundreds
of
> classified documents invisibly strapped onto your wrist.
>
> http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/watches/5eec/
>
> Twenty years ago, we couldn't bring calculators with memories into the
work
> areas (I once had a security officer pick up a calculator I was using and
> ask, "Is that a classified number?"). Today, most engineering and
> management types are wedded to their PDAs, and the security guys either
> have to allow them in or cripple the true work.

Security level must have been low if PDAs were allowed in/out without
checking/vetting several steps along the way. PDAs still had to be cleared,
initially, where I worked two years ago and they were checked going in and
out of the secured facility. One chap made the mistake of replacing his PDA
with a newer model and was more than a bit perturbed as they proceeded to
dismantle it in front of him - basically destroyed the unit. I guess that
was part of the intent. :-)

There is security, and then there is real security. :-)

Michael Pilla

[Snowbird]

Ron Wanttaja > wrote in message >...
> On 7 Aug 2003 20:25:14 -0700, (Snowbird) wrote:
> >Would you gents mind changing the Subject: line?

> While I agree with you (and usually change the subject line myself), lately
> we've been getting a batch of folks who complain when you do that....

There's a Far Side cartoon which features a man standing in front
of two doors labeled "damned if you do" and "damned if you don't",
with a devil poking him with a pitchfork and saying "c'mon, c'mon...
you've got to choose, it's either one or the other"

> No. I wouldn't want to be a security officer.

Concur. There's also that fact that whatever screening criteria
are being used, they've spectacularly failed to catch several
very damaging "moles"

Cheers
Sydney

[Badwater Bill]

>"It's light blue."
>"No, it's light gray."
>"What?!? It's white!"
>"No way stupid, it's light blue!"
>"Light gray!"
>"White, moron! White, white, WHITE!"
>
>So there may have been more to his clearance revocation than just the
>one statement:-)
>
>
>Mike


There probably was, but there needn't have been. I've had people
under me I had to go to battle for over ridiculous things similar to
this. Once the security root-worms get you in their sights, you
become interesting to them. They then start digging. All of what
they can dig up can be circumstantial, doesn't matter. If they can
simply tell a reasonably convincing story that your "Character" might
not be good, you lose the clearance.

Yes, it can be based upon their perception of your "Character" and
that alone. I've seen it happen. I think the FAA has acted about as
poorly in some cases since a certificate is not a right, it's a
privilege.

Dr. Strangewater

[Ron Wanttaja]

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 12:50:07 GMT, "Michael Pilla" >
wrote:


>> Twenty years ago, we couldn't bring calculators with memories into the work
>> areas (I once had a security officer pick up a calculator I was using and
>> ask, "Is that a classified number?"). Today, most engineering and
>> management types are wedded to their PDAs, and the security guys either
>> have to allow them in or cripple the true work.
>
>Security level must have been low if PDAs were allowed in/out without
>checking/vetting several steps along the way.

There are generally three phases of security:

1. "Never heard of them"
2. "Oh my God, no! Keep them out of here!"
3. "Well, all right, but....."

I've seen this process happen on several types of new technology. Soon
after they reluctantly agreed that you could bring in calculators with
memory, someone showed up with a TI-59 with the magnetic-card read/write
capability.

As far as the PDAs were concerned, initially they were looked on as nothing
more than the electronic equivalents of paper notepads or upgraded versions
of multifunction calculators. Then some bright spark realized that many of
them had wireless transmission capability (e.g., "beaming") and the
knee-jerk happened. Eventually, they're to the point where they approve
them on an individual model-by-model basis depending upon the capability of
the unit, and upon a manager's signoff that the unit is vital to work
performance. So when you see PDAs, they have big ugly "Security Approved"
stickers on them.

I've always been fascinated with the differences in security levels between
government agencies, and between those agencies and the contractors that do
the work for them. In the past, I've had to undergo routine exit searches
on mildly sensitive programs, and while on another program we were sealed
in a metal TEMPEST enclosure to do our work, while our customer had
ordinary offices with windows that opened. I still am appalled at how easy
it was for Wen Ho Lee....

Ron Wanttaja

[[email protected]]

On Thu, 07 Aug 2003 23:50:54 -0500, Big John >
wrote:

>When stationed in Canal Zone, I and a couple of my friends bought a
>brass mine high in the Andes in Peru.
>
>I ended up the managing partner.

>If you have a serious interest in a long term investment let me know.
>
>Big John
>

My mettalurgy might be a bit rusty but I thought Brass was a
combination of copper and tin....

Boy that mine must really be valuable then....;-]

Q

[Snowbird]

(pac plyer) wrote in message >...

> So you and the trolls win Sydney. Google's a tape-recorder and it can
> be played back any time. Can't you just let it go for a while and see
> what happens? :-)

Pac, sweetie (I hope you don't mind...you're so *cute*!), think
what you like. I wish you the best...I do, really!

I don't think I have tuppence of influence here. Speak or
don't speak, no difference. How could it be otherwise? No
one controls my behavior, I am responsible. Likewise with
others.

Google's not necessary. Newsreaders showing the current
crop tell the scoop, in my view. I'd be happy to be shown
wrong. I'm not holding my breath.

Further discussion, just spitting upwind, as I see it.

Godspeed!
Sydney

[Wise One]

(Snowbird) wrote in message ...

> A friend's neighbor has a pot-bellied pig. 5 years ago it was
> funny and entertaining and more-or-less fit to come in the
> living room. Now it's a big stanky porker which smushes the
> veggies and tears up the flower beds every time it gets loose,
> and it's just not going to be able to revert to anything else
> no matter how much they wish it would.

Them things are nasty. I had a friend that had one. It was cute at
first but like you said it got big and lazy. One night they was
watching TV and it started licking itself. It shot off across the
room and hit my bud's wife in the chin. My bud got rid of it first
thing the next morning. I think I would have had bacon.

[pac plyer]

So much for my unmoderated newsgroup argument. This one's just to get
"Festus" the troll off the board. Time to let this thread die I
think.

pac

[Badwater Bill]

ust my observation from lurking here since 95'
>
>Likewise. I remember Bill Phillips first posts with the OMABP,
>and some other sterling and entertaining posts. But that was
>then, this is now.
>
>Pac plyer, sorry to be the one to tell you this, but you're
>either hopelessly naive or uninformed about some matters (and
>I don't mean minutia of who sad what when on USENET).
>
>I don't mean to insult you, but it's like you're the USENET
>equivalent of a case study from that 'ol pop-psy book "Women
>who love too much: when you keep wishing and hoping he'll
>change".
>
>A friend's neighbor has a pot-bellied pig. 5 years ago it was
>funny and entertaining and more-or-less fit to come in the
>living room. Now it's a big stanky porker which smushes the
>veggies and tears up the flower beds every time it gets loose,
>and it's just not going to be able to revert to anything else
>no matter how much they wish it would.

Yeah, Sydney, it's pigs like you that dog people around and make
posting here a chore.

You've never said anything I've seen here that contributed to the
field of aviation. All you have ever done is bitch about what I've
posted, or the quality of some CFI that gave your husband a BFR. This
post of yours here is typical. Nothing to do with flying, just taking
shots at someone else and trying to couch it in civil drivel.

All I've ever seen here that's come from your computer are complaints,
not solutions, to GA problems. I consider you a whiner with a
negative attitude and a know nothing.

What post have you EVER made that had anything positive to say about
aviation? I missed it. I think you are the utlimate gossip and you
are always negative.

In the early days of posting here I had thick skin to low-time
know-it-all pilots like you. My thick skin has been eaten away by all
the dweebs (like you) who have never flown much but who all have big
opinions about everything they know nothing about.

You lead the pack in my opinion.

Have a nice day moron.

BWB





>Cheers,
>Sydney

[Snowbird]

(Stella"Star o' t'West") wrote in message >...
> Badwater Bill sez:
> >Yeah, Sydney, it's pigs like you that dog people around and make
> >posting here a chore.

> Hey, why does Sydney get all the venom?

Stella,

I don't care about the venom myself. When I'm using a news source
w/out killfiles, I'm able to ignore anything I don't choose to read.
Anyone who knows us knows what we do at the airport, anyone who
doesn't know us can speculate as they please, they just look
kinda silly in my opinion.

But what I do notice is the apparent "double standard."

When anyone else complains about something another person posts
the response is loud and immediate: THEN DON'T READ IT!!! Use
a killfile, ignore it, what-have-you. The "Group Think" (from
at least part of the group) seems to be that using the group
as a vehicle for persistant, prolonged personal vendettas and
attacks is acceptable "social norm" because if knowledgeable
people really want to stay around they'll just killfile or
ignore what they don't want to read. I disagree, but O.K., that's
the theory.

Mr. Phillips, on the other hand, is apparently such a shy and
delicate flower that his intestinal equilibrium is disturbed
by the mere knowledge that something he doesn't like is being
posted. The mere existance of such posts (which he could killfile,
or ignore, as his cronies advise others to do) "makes posting a
chore" and totally CONTROLS HIS BEHAVIOR, making it impossible
for HIM to write interesting and topical aviation posts.

Hello? Are killfiles (or simply exercise of self-restraint)
too difficult for our resident self-proclaimed genius to master?

Isn't there a contradiction (and a double standard) here?

> Speaking of know-it-alls who are always negative.... Pot. Kettle.

Indeed. I find "PAC plyer"s apparent conviction that Bill will
spontaneously recover from 4 years of spewing off-topic personal
attacks and venom and once more contribute entertaining and fascinating
posts "Precious And Charming", but the evidence appears to indicate
to the contrary. Like I said, I'd be happy to be mistaken.

All the best,
Sydney

[Badwater Bill]

>>
>
>http://www.scottandmichelle.net/scott/dtv.html
>
>You could be in Pheonix or Tuscon, but the beam you're in covers Las Vegas. It
>doesn't cover most of California. Google says no one named either mturner or pac
>plyer ever posted in alt.dis or alt.dis.information.
>
>Only Bill would ever suggest that Sydney should appologize to Bill.

BBWWAHAHHAHHAAAAAA

That is funny.

Hey Pac. Are you at Sandy? If so, give old Paul Muskat a big sloppy
wet kiss on the lips from Badwater Bill and tell him to kiss my entire
ass.

Bridget is too good for that old coot!

In fact, come to think of it, you might be Paul. Be careful about
telling these assholes anything of any substance. The comment about
your hangar is not real good. Many of these *******s will make you
their hobby and report you for something like that just for fun. This
crowd is such a fun loving group, when I owned an RV-6 that I parked
outside, they slashed my tires for a couple posts I made.

They are a lovely group of cock suckers, Pac. Watch your six.

BWB



>
>>If this weenie responds, would somebody copy his full post in their
>>response please so I can see it. I'd like to know what the rest of
>>this worm's comments are. Somebody tell me his name!
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>BWB, whoops, pacplyer

[Badwater Bill]

>Hey, why does Sydney get all the venom? Just because she knows what she's
>talking about and doesn't like bad tempered rat-*******s with nothing useful to
>contribute, she gets the full brunt of your girls-have-cooties attitude.

Because I think she's a ****.

>
>I'd be jealous if you weren't such a slimeball, Bill. You've managed to sour
>every place you appear and drive off all your friends.

You are still jealous...and my friends are right here moron. And, I
haven't even started souring things like I might if I get ****ed.

>
>People who've earned the respect and friendship of those who know them don't
>like you. Why doesn't that make you go away?

I have so many friends, I need to dispose of some of them. I even
have Auxiliary friends. As far as I'm concerned, I could give a ****
less who responds to my posts.

In fact, why do you find it so necessary to comment, you annoymous
cowardly little faggot prick?

Do a Google search on everything Sydney has posted over the years
then try to distill off any contribution she's ever made to this group
concerning flying or building. If you can find anything that is not
some regurgitation of something someone else has posted, I'll eat my
hat. All I've ever seen her do it set herself up as some kind of
expert commentary-generating bitch who takes shots at the real people
here who do go out and do it everyday.

I doubt that she's even an average pilot from the bull **** she's
posted here over the years. She argues with people who have been
flight instructors for 30 years, or flying the big iron for the same
amount of time as if she were a professional pilot herself. That's
the problem with an open forum like this, even an idiot has the same
priority to post on a subject they know nothing about. But a
professional pilot or mechanic comes in here giving the group real
data and real information and they get trounced by the weekend pilots
like Sydney. The professionals see the bull ****, give up, and leave.
It hurts the entire group.

It's obvious who walks the walk in here. There's a pecking order,
and I think that many, like her, are too dumb to know the difference
between a solo student and an ATP when they post. It's them who are
the noise and pollution of RAH, not me. It's them and the cowards
like you who are annonymous chicken****s who have the big opinions
that can't hold water but hide behind your computer screen in horror
should you be found out.

BWB




>
>Speaking of know-it-alls who are always negative.... Pot. Kettle.

[pac plyer]

(Badwater Bill) wrote
> Hey Pac. Are you at Sandy? If so, give old Paul Muskat a big sloppy
> wet kiss on the lips from Badwater Bill and tell him to kiss my entire
> ass.
>
> Bridget is too good for that old coot!
>
> In fact, come to think of it, you might be Paul. Be careful about
> telling these assholes anything of any substance. The comment about
> your hangar is not real good. Many of these *******s will make you
> their hobby and report you for something like that just for fun. This
> crowd is such a fun loving group, when I owned an RV-6 that I parked
> outside, they slashed my tires for a couple posts I made.
>
> They are a lovely group of cock suckers, Pac. Watch your six.
>
> BWB

Yeah Bad,

Thanks for the heads up. Don't worry; I made up a lot of that just
for Red Herring effect. I figured as much about the anonymous posters
during the Capt/Dr wars so I didn't post anything until I could find a
really good lawyer. He's an ex-judge and he just doesn't loose cases.
Counter-suit is his forte'.

If any tire-slashers show up at my buildings, they're on a private
farm adjoining midfield the airport with a taxiway easement, so I
generally shoot first and ask questions later. ;-) And, I've been
reported so many times for so many things, my file is already full...
but not to worry... I have pals in the FAA who trained me to fly jets
years ago... they're getting pretty old but as long as they hang in
there I'm covered. I'm waiting for Paul to get back to me. Looking
forward to talking to myself.. I mean... looking forward to talking
with you. ;-)

pacwater, ooops I mean,

Badplyer, ooops...

what the hell .. they're on to us!
(this oughta confuse 90% of the dweebs)

[nafod40]

pac plyer wrote:

>
> pacwater, ooops I mean,
>
> Badplyer, ooops...
>
> what the hell .. they're on to us!
> (this oughta confuse 90% of the dweebs)

Need help? You might want to try...

Bad Bilgewater
Bill Backwater
Biff Backwasher

I think they're all untaken.

[pac plyer]

(Snowbird) wrote
<snip a lot of hurt feelings here>
> Indeed. I find "PAC plyer"s apparent conviction that Bill will
> spontaneously recover from 4 years of spewing off-topic personal
> attacks and venom and once more contribute entertaining and fascinating
> posts "Precious And Charming", but the evidence appears to indicate
> to the contrary. Like I said, I'd be happy to be mistaken.
>
> All the best,
> Sydney


Sydney, Sydney, Sydney,

You claim to want the verbal abuse to end, but then you persist in
inflaming the situation. If I didn't know better, I'd swear you must
be related to Tarver. (He seems to enjoy abuse.)

I thought the pig thing was rather mindless, but must have something
to do with fond memories of parties with farm animals or something. I
won't ask :-) See, like the power worm thing, this is a joke. :-D

It's Usenet. Lighten up already. Either your butt floss is wound a
little too tight or I'd swear you have a crush on Badwater Bill. He
doesn't look at you as his equal, and it's just killing you. I think
you know why. I think you suspect he's larger than life, and there's
just nothing you can do to get an "atta-girl" from him. "That damn
man!" is about all you can come up with. BTW, you're not a
hot-blooded Irish girl are you? ;-) (Damn, this is kinda turning me
on!)


Some off-the-cuff questions:

Do you have any formal education? (I'm sure you do.)

Would you use this pig analogy in the presence of one of your
professors? (I'm sure you would not.)

Try a little reverse-psychology. Try showing a little respect to Dr.
Philips. His only defense against your torture is more profanity.
You should be intelligent enough to figure that out.

pacplyer
RAH soap reviews

[Badwater Bill]

On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 19:27:33 +0000 (UTC), nafod40
> wrote:

>pac plyer wrote:
>
>>
>> pacwater, ooops I mean,
>>
>> Badplyer, ooops...
>>
>> what the hell .. they're on to us!
>> (this oughta confuse 90% of the dweebs)
>
>Need help? You might want to try...
>
>Bad Bilgewater
>Bill Backwater
>Biff Backwasher
>
>I think they're all untaken.

I like Bedwetter Bill best!

BWB

[Lady Pilot]

(Badwater Bill) wrote in news:3f4521d8.570722156
@news.west.earthlink.net:

> Lady Pilot. What it is? How you been? Haven't heard a word out of
> you in two years. I do remember some "Stella" broad a couple years
> ago. Weren't you arguing with her about something in them thar days?
> In fact I saw a photo of her once, IIRC.

You mean you forgot that conversation a little while ago? I'm hurt. When
are we going to go flying?

> Hey, babe, you still want to get it on?

With you? Any time, big boy. Does it still glow in the dark? Hee hee hee.

> Who was that asshole who kept calling you a **** everytime he posted?
> My mind is going. I can't remember the driveling details of the RAH
> wars of the past.

Of course not! Not with the amount of ethanol we both consume! Who can
remember anything?

LP

[John Ousterhout]

On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 14:09:37 GMT, (Badwater
Bill) wrote:

>I have so many friends, I need to dispose of some of them.

One less now.

- John Ousterhout -

[Badwater Bill]

>
>> Who was that asshole who kept calling you a **** everytime he posted?
>> My mind is going. I can't remember the driveling details of the RAH
>> wars of the past.
>
>Of course not! Not with the amount of ethanol we both consume! Who can
>remember anything?
>

Even more to the point, who wants to remember?

BWB

[Dave American]

(Badwater Bill) wrote in
:

>
>>
>>> Who was that asshole who kept calling you a **** everytime he posted?
>>> My mind is going. I can't remember the driveling details of the RAH
>>> wars of the past.
>>
>>Of course not! Not with the amount of ethanol we both consume! Who can
>>remember anything?
>>
>
> Even more to the point, who wants to remember?
>

Obviously.

What was it Billy, the uncle molesting you? The other kids laughing at you?
The adults continuing to laugh at you as you got old, ugly, pathetic and
drunker?
All of the above?

[QW]

(pac plyer) wrote in
om:

> (Badwater Bill) wrote
>> Hey Pac. Are you at Sandy? If so, give old Paul Muskat a big sloppy
>> wet kiss on the lips from Badwater Bill and tell him to kiss my entire
>> ass.
>>
>> Bridget is too good for that old coot!
>>
>> In fact, come to think of it, you might be Paul. Be careful about
>> telling these assholes anything of any substance. The comment about
>> your hangar is not real good. Many of these *******s will make you
>> their hobby and report you for something like that just for fun. This
>> crowd is such a fun loving group, when I owned an RV-6 that I parked
>> outside, they slashed my tires for a couple posts I made.
>>
>> They are a lovely group of cock suckers, Pac. Watch your six.
>>
>> BWB
>
> Yeah Bad,
>
> Thanks for the heads up. Don't worry; I made up a lot of that just
> for Red Herring effect. I figured as much about the anonymous posters
> during the Capt/Dr wars so I didn't post anything until I could find a
> really good lawyer. He's an ex-judge and he just doesn't loose cases.
> Counter-suit is his forte'.
>
> If any tire-slashers show up at my buildings, they're on a private
> farm adjoining midfield the airport with a taxiway easement, so I
> generally shoot first and ask questions later. ;-) And, I've been
> reported so many times for so many things, my file is already full...
> but not to worry... I have pals in the FAA who trained me to fly jets
> years ago... they're getting pretty old but as long as they hang in
> there I'm covered. I'm waiting for Paul to get back to me. Looking
> forward to talking to myself.. I mean... looking forward to talking
> with you. ;-)


Wanna bet?