"British trace missile in copter strike to Iran"

[Mike[_7_]]

British trace missile in copter strike to Iran
By Sean Rayment
LONDON SUNDAY TELEGRAPH
Published March 4, 2007

LONDON -- A missile that brought down a Royal Air Force Lynx
helicopter and killed five British service members was smuggled into
Iraq by Iranian agents, an official inquiry into the attack will
reveal.
The Sunday Telegraph has learned that a British Army Board of
Inquiry (BOI) into the events surrounding the May attack will state
that the weapon, a shoulder-launched surface-to-air missile known as
an SA14 Strella, came from Iran.
The attack, which was responsible for the death of Flight Lt.
Sarah Mulvihill, the first British servicewoman to be killed on active
service since World War II, appears to provide further evidence of
Iran's direct involvement in the deaths of British troops serving in
Iraq.
A Defense Ministry spokesman declined to comment on the inquiry.
"The board of inquiry process has not yet been concluded. It would
be wrong to speculate about the cause of the crash until this process
has finished," a ministry spokesman said.
It is understood that the inquiry, which has assessed evidence
from military engineers and scientists, will conclude that the
aircraft was shot down with an Iranian SA14 missile. The inquiry,
which is conducted by senior air force and army officers, will deliver
its finding to defense chiefs next month.
The report also will reveal whether the helicopter's self-defense
systems were working properly and whether they provided adequate
protection from a missile fired from relatively short range.
Traditionally, the role of a military board of inquiry, which can
examine everything from the loss of a piece of equipment to the deaths
of servicemen, is not to attribute "blame" for a particular incident.
Instead, senior officers make recommendations to prevent another
similar incident.
The Foreign Office is expected to use the findings to step up
diplomatic pressure on the Iranian government, which has been asked to
crack down on units within its defense and security services believed
to be supplying weapons and bomb-making technology to insurgents in
Iraq.
Dozens of British soldiers have been killed in Iraq by improvised
explosive devices in the form of roadside bombs, thought to have
either been manufactured in Iran or by insurgents trained by the
Iranians.
Hundreds of thousands of Strellas were produced by the Soviet
Union in the 1970s and were used to equip armies throughout the Warsaw
Pact, Central Asia and the Middle East, including Syria and Iran. The
same weapon system is also thought to have been responsible for
bringing down several U.S. helicopters in Iraq.
Although the weapon is cheap to produce and easy to assemble,
operators need some skill to use it effectively, suggesting that the
missile was fired either by an Iranian agent or by someone who had
been trained by a skilled soldier.
The attack also claimed the life of the most senior British
officer to have been killed in the three-year conflict, Wing Cmdr.
John Coxen, 46, who was about to take over command of the British
helicopter fleet in southern Iraq.
The other three men killed were the pilot, Lt. Cmdr. Darren
Chapman, 40; his co-pilot, Capt. David Dobson, 27; and the door
gunner, Marine Paul Collins, 21.
The Lynx Mark 7 was traveling low over central Basra on a sortie
to familiarize Cmdr. Coxen with the dangers his pilots might face.
Although it was believed at first that the helicopter had been brought
down by a "lucky hit" from a rocket-propelled grenade, British troops
found discarded missile parts in a nearby building after the incident.

[Mike[_7_]]

British trace missile in copter strike to Iran
By Sean Rayment
LONDON SUNDAY TELEGRAPH
Published March 4, 2007

LONDON -- A missile that brought down a Royal Air Force Lynx
helicopter and killed five British service members was smuggled into
Iraq by Iranian agents, an official inquiry into the attack will
reveal.
The Sunday Telegraph has learned that a British Army Board of
Inquiry (BOI) into the events surrounding the May attack will state
that the weapon, a shoulder-launched surface-to-air missile known as
an SA14 Strella, came from Iran.
The attack, which was responsible for the death of Flight Lt.
Sarah Mulvihill, the first British servicewoman to be killed on active
service since World War II, appears to provide further evidence of
Iran's direct involvement in the deaths of British troops serving in
Iraq.
A Defense Ministry spokesman declined to comment on the inquiry.
"The board of inquiry process has not yet been concluded. It would
be wrong to speculate about the cause of the crash until this process
has finished," a ministry spokesman said.
It is understood that the inquiry, which has assessed evidence
from military engineers and scientists, will conclude that the
aircraft was shot down with an Iranian SA14 missile. The inquiry,
which is conducted by senior air force and army officers, will deliver
its finding to defense chiefs next month.
The report also will reveal whether the helicopter's self-defense
systems were working properly and whether they provided adequate
protection from a missile fired from relatively short range.
Traditionally, the role of a military board of inquiry, which can
examine everything from the loss of a piece of equipment to the deaths
of servicemen, is not to attribute "blame" for a particular incident.
Instead, senior officers make recommendations to prevent another
similar incident.
The Foreign Office is expected to use the findings to step up
diplomatic pressure on the Iranian government, which has been asked to
crack down on units within its defense and security services believed
to be supplying weapons and bomb-making technology to insurgents in
Iraq.
Dozens of British soldiers have been killed in Iraq by improvised
explosive devices in the form of roadside bombs, thought to have
either been manufactured in Iran or by insurgents trained by the
Iranians.
Hundreds of thousands of Strellas were produced by the Soviet
Union in the 1970s and were used to equip armies throughout the Warsaw
Pact, Central Asia and the Middle East, including Syria and Iran. The
same weapon system is also thought to have been responsible for
bringing down several U.S. helicopters in Iraq.
Although the weapon is cheap to produce and easy to assemble,
operators need some skill to use it effectively, suggesting that the
missile was fired either by an Iranian agent or by someone who had
been trained by a skilled soldier.
The attack also claimed the life of the most senior British
officer to have been killed in the three-year conflict, Wing Cmdr.
John Coxen, 46, who was about to take over command of the British
helicopter fleet in southern Iraq.
The other three men killed were the pilot, Lt. Cmdr. Darren
Chapman, 40; his co-pilot, Capt. David Dobson, 27; and the door
gunner, Marine Paul Collins, 21.
The Lynx Mark 7 was traveling low over central Basra on a sortie
to familiarize Cmdr. Coxen with the dangers his pilots might face.
Although it was believed at first that the helicopter had been brought
down by a "lucky hit" from a rocket-propelled grenade, British troops
found discarded missile parts in a nearby building after the incident.

[Hertz_Donut]

"Mike" > wrote in message
news:repost.88401.1173235525.141777.49730@j27g2000 cwj.googlegroups.com...
> British trace missile in copter strike to Iran
> By Sean Rayment
> LONDON SUNDAY TELEGRAPH
> Published March 4, 2007
>
> LONDON -- A missile that brought down a Royal Air Force Lynx
> helicopter and killed five British service members was smuggled into
> Iraq by Iranian agents, an official inquiry into the attack will
> reveal.
> The Sunday Telegraph has learned that a British Army Board of
> Inquiry (BOI) into the events surrounding the May attack will state
> that the weapon, a shoulder-launched surface-to-air missile known as
> an SA14 Strella, came from Iran.
> The attack, which was responsible for the death of Flight Lt.
> Sarah Mulvihill, the first British servicewoman to be killed on active
> service since World War II, appears to provide further evidence of
> Iran's direct involvement in the deaths of British troops serving in
> Iraq.
> A Defense Ministry spokesman declined to comment on the inquiry.
> "The board of inquiry process has not yet been concluded. It would
> be wrong to speculate about the cause of the crash until this process
> has finished," a ministry spokesman said.
> It is understood that the inquiry, which has assessed evidence
> from military engineers and scientists, will conclude that the
> aircraft was shot down with an Iranian SA14 missile. The inquiry,
> which is conducted by senior air force and army officers, will deliver
> its finding to defense chiefs next month.
> The report also will reveal whether the helicopter's self-defense
> systems were working properly and whether they provided adequate
> protection from a missile fired from relatively short range.
> Traditionally, the role of a military board of inquiry, which can
> examine everything from the loss of a piece of equipment to the deaths
> of servicemen, is not to attribute "blame" for a particular incident.
> Instead, senior officers make recommendations to prevent another
> similar incident.
> The Foreign Office is expected to use the findings to step up
> diplomatic pressure on the Iranian government, which has been asked to
> crack down on units within its defense and security services believed
> to be supplying weapons and bomb-making technology to insurgents in
> Iraq.
> Dozens of British soldiers have been killed in Iraq by improvised
> explosive devices in the form of roadside bombs, thought to have
> either been manufactured in Iran or by insurgents trained by the
> Iranians.
> Hundreds of thousands of Strellas were produced by the Soviet
> Union in the 1970s and were used to equip armies throughout the Warsaw
> Pact, Central Asia and the Middle East, including Syria and Iran. The
> same weapon system is also thought to have been responsible for
> bringing down several U.S. helicopters in Iraq.
> Although the weapon is cheap to produce and easy to assemble,
> operators need some skill to use it effectively, suggesting that the
> missile was fired either by an Iranian agent or by someone who had
> been trained by a skilled soldier.
> The attack also claimed the life of the most senior British
> officer to have been killed in the three-year conflict, Wing Cmdr.
> John Coxen, 46, who was about to take over command of the British
> helicopter fleet in southern Iraq.
> The other three men killed were the pilot, Lt. Cmdr. Darren
> Chapman, 40; his co-pilot, Capt. David Dobson, 27; and the door
> gunner, Marine Paul Collins, 21.
> The Lynx Mark 7 was traveling low over central Basra on a sortie
> to familiarize Cmdr. Coxen with the dangers his pilots might face.
> Although it was believed at first that the helicopter had been brought
> down by a "lucky hit" from a rocket-propelled grenade, British troops
> found discarded missile parts in a nearby building after the incident.
>
>

Mike;

Thanks for this one!


Unfortunately, it is likely to upset the libs that haunt this group...

Honu

[TJ]

Sean Rayment at his worst yet again.

The Lynx was Royal Marines. The RAF does not operate Lynx.
Rayment is notorious for gaffs. He claimed that the RAF completely
lost a Harrier in Afghanistan due to a mortar attack. None were lost.
One slightly damaged and repaired on site. One repaired back in UK.

[DDAY]

----------
In article . com>, "TJ"
> wrote:

> Sean Rayment at his worst yet again.
>
> The Lynx was Royal Marines. The RAF does not operate Lynx.
> Rayment is notorious for gaffs. He claimed that the RAF completely
> lost a Harrier in Afghanistan due to a mortar attack. None were lost.
> One slightly damaged and repaired on site. One repaired back in UK.

Did I miss something or did the reporter completely leave out a key
detail--the date of the attack?



D

[Jack Linthicum]

On Mar 7, 11:56 pm, "DDAY" > wrote:
> ----------
> In article . com>, "TJ"
>
> > wrote:
> > Sean Rayment at his worst yet again.
>
> > The Lynx was Royal Marines. The RAF does not operate Lynx.
> > Rayment is notorious for gaffs. He claimed that the RAF completely
> > lost a Harrier in Afghanistan due to a mortar attack. None were lost.
> > One slightly damaged and repaired on site. One repaired back in UK.
>
> Did I miss something or did the reporter completely leave out a key
> detail--the date of the attack?
>
> D

May 6, 2006, why do you ask? Also, the statement is always an official
inquiry into the attack "will"reveal. It's been four days, any actual
statement or was that it? Other question, if the missile was a Strela
SA-14 how did they know the Iranians smuggled it in? IIRC Saddam had a
few of those and the al-Qaeda worked Afghanistan with them.

14 May 2006
RUSSIANS' MISSILE HIT OUR LYNX

THE British helicopter shot down by Iraqi terrorists in Basra was hit
with a Russian-made heat-seeking missile, say military experts.

A team investigating last weekend's tragedy, in which five service
personnel died, believes an SA 14 Strela rocket was used, not a rocket-
propelled grenade as first thought.

The shoulder-held SA 14 launcher has been upgraded recently to help it
deceive a helicopter's defence systems.

The missile that hit the Royal Navy Lynx helicopter was fired from
next to the Basra headquarters of Moqtadr al-Sadr's insurgent Mehdi
Army.
http://www.sundaymirror.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=17075094&method=full&siteid=62484&headline=russians--missile-hit-our-lynx--name_page.html

[zoot]

On 8 mar, 19:06, "Jack Linthicum" > wrote:
> On Mar 7, 11:56 pm, "DDAY" > wrote:
>
> > ----------
> > In article . com>, "TJ"
>
> > > wrote:
> > > Sean Rayment at his worst yet again.
>
> > > The Lynx was Royal Marines. The RAF does not operate Lynx.
> > > Rayment is notorious for gaffs. He claimed that the RAF completely
> > > lost a Harrier in Afghanistan due to a mortar attack. None were lost.
> > > One slightly damaged and repaired on site. One repaired back in UK.
>
> > Did I miss something or did the reporter completely leave out a key
> > detail--the date of the attack?
>
> > D
>
> May 6, 2006, why do you ask? Also, the statement is always an official
> inquiry into the attack "will"reveal. It's been four days, any actual
> statement or was that it? Other question, if the missile was a Strela
> SA-14 how did they know the Iranians smuggled it in? IIRC Saddam had a
> few of those and the al-Qaeda worked Afghanistan with them.
>
> 14 May 2006
> RUSSIANS' MISSILE HIT OUR LYNX
>
> THE British helicopter shot down by Iraqi terrorists in Basra was hit
> with a Russian-made heat-seeking missile, say military experts.
>
> A team investigating last weekend's tragedy, in which five service
> personnel died, believes an SA 14 Strela rocket was used, not a rocket-
> propelled grenade as first thought.
>
> The shoulder-held SA 14 launcher has been upgraded recently to help it
> deceive a helicopter's defence systems.
>
> The missile that hit the Royal Navy Lynx helicopter was fired from
> next to the Basra headquarters of Moqtadr al-Sadr's insurgent Mehdi
> Army.http://www.sundaymirror.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=17075094&method=full&s...

Do you know that the agressors receive weapons from US and UK..
Zoot

[Jack Linthicum]

On Mar 9, 10:05 am, "zoot" > wrote:
> On 8 mar, 19:06, "Jack Linthicum" > wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 7, 11:56 pm, "DDAY" > wrote:
>
> > > ----------
> > > In article . com>, "TJ"
>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > Sean Rayment at his worst yet again.
>
> > > > The Lynx was Royal Marines. The RAF does not operate Lynx.
> > > > Rayment is notorious for gaffs. He claimed that the RAF completely
> > > > lost a Harrier in Afghanistan due to a mortar attack. None were lost.
> > > > One slightly damaged and repaired on site. One repaired back in UK.
>
> > > Did I miss something or did the reporter completely leave out a key
> > > detail--the date of the attack?
>
> > > D
>
> > May 6, 2006, why do you ask? Also, the statement is always an official
> > inquiry into the attack "will"reveal. It's been four days, any actual
> > statement or was that it? Other question, if the missile was a Strela
> > SA-14 how did they know the Iranians smuggled it in? IIRC Saddam had a
> > few of those and the al-Qaeda worked Afghanistan with them.
>
> > 14 May 2006
> > RUSSIANS' MISSILE HIT OUR LYNX
>
> > THE British helicopter shot down by Iraqi terrorists in Basra was hit
> > with a Russian-made heat-seeking missile, say military experts.
>
> > A team investigating last weekend's tragedy, in which five service
> > personnel died, believes an SA 14 Strela rocket was used, not a rocket-
> > propelled grenade as first thought.
>
> > The shoulder-held SA 14 launcher has been upgraded recently to help it
> > deceive a helicopter's defence systems.
>
> > The missile that hit the Royal Navy Lynx helicopter was fired from
> > next to the Basra headquarters of Moqtadr al-Sadr's insurgent Mehdi
> > Army.http://www.sundaymirror.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=17075094&method=full&s...
>
> Do you know that the agressors receive weapons from US and UK..
> Zoot

We sold Saddam a pack of the SA-14s and other goodies. You will have
to define "aggressor" better, after all we invaded them.

[DDAY]

----------
In article . com>, "Jack
Linthicum" > wrote:

>> Did I miss something or did the reporter completely leave out a key
>> detail--the date of the attack?
>
> May 6, 2006, why do you ask? Also, the statement is always an official

Because it's a pretty important piece of information and the reporter seems
to have forgotten to include it.



D