Larry Dighera
March 10th 07, 07:05 PM
AOPA CRUNCHES THE NUMBERS FOR FAA FUNDING PLAN
Staffers at AOPA have been sorting through the FAA's funding
proposal to figure out exactly what all the proposed changes would
cost. They've found that if the FAA gets its way, fliers of
piston-engine aircraft would see their fees increase $100 million per
year -- more than triple what they pay today. Fees for turbine-powered
GA aircraft would also more than triple, adding up to an extra $868
million per year. The big winners would be the "legacy" airlines,
whose taxes would be cut by more than one-fourth, saving them about
$1.7 billion a year. The low-cost airlines would see a 15-percent cut,
saving about $286 million per year. "It's no wonder the airlines love
this proposal so much," said AOPA President Phil Boyer. "Not only
would they pay less, they'd have more control over who uses the air
traffic control system, and they'd have the majority vote in setting
the fees they charge themselves and others."
http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archives/avflash/821-full.html#194617
RACCA, HAI JOINS RANKS AGAINST USER FEES
The Regional Air Cargo Carriers Association (RACCA) and Helicopter
Association International (HAI) recently joined ranks with other
aviation groups to take a stand against the FAA's proposed change to a
system funded by user fees. In a statement to members of Congress
),
RACCA said the proposal would triple the fuel taxes paid by its
members. The group also said the cost of collecting new fees for GA
operations and services would be prohibitive. "If implemented, the
proposal puts the FAA in the position of being a tax collector,
diluting its mandated focus on aviation safety issues," according to
RACCA. Meanwhile, last week at Heli-Expo HAI President Matthew Zuccaro
said his organization is "strenuously opposed" to the FAA's user-fee
proposal, charging that the fourfold fuel tax increase and other
additional untold fees are "not acceptable."
http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archives/avflash/821-full.html#194614
Staffers at AOPA have been sorting through the FAA's funding
proposal to figure out exactly what all the proposed changes would
cost. They've found that if the FAA gets its way, fliers of
piston-engine aircraft would see their fees increase $100 million per
year -- more than triple what they pay today. Fees for turbine-powered
GA aircraft would also more than triple, adding up to an extra $868
million per year. The big winners would be the "legacy" airlines,
whose taxes would be cut by more than one-fourth, saving them about
$1.7 billion a year. The low-cost airlines would see a 15-percent cut,
saving about $286 million per year. "It's no wonder the airlines love
this proposal so much," said AOPA President Phil Boyer. "Not only
would they pay less, they'd have more control over who uses the air
traffic control system, and they'd have the majority vote in setting
the fees they charge themselves and others."
http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archives/avflash/821-full.html#194617
RACCA, HAI JOINS RANKS AGAINST USER FEES
The Regional Air Cargo Carriers Association (RACCA) and Helicopter
Association International (HAI) recently joined ranks with other
aviation groups to take a stand against the FAA's proposed change to a
system funded by user fees. In a statement to members of Congress
),
RACCA said the proposal would triple the fuel taxes paid by its
members. The group also said the cost of collecting new fees for GA
operations and services would be prohibitive. "If implemented, the
proposal puts the FAA in the position of being a tax collector,
diluting its mandated focus on aviation safety issues," according to
RACCA. Meanwhile, last week at Heli-Expo HAI President Matthew Zuccaro
said his organization is "strenuously opposed" to the FAA's user-fee
proposal, charging that the fourfold fuel tax increase and other
additional untold fees are "not acceptable."
http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archives/avflash/821-full.html#194614