Log in

View Full Version : Ford V-6 engine work


Corky Scott
August 12th 03, 05:14 PM
I got a call from the Upper Valley Machine Shop Thursday of last week.
Will was headed for Watkins Glenn for the Bush Nothern tour and he
wanted me to come down and get my engine, it was ready to be picked
up.

Will has had the engine for about a year now. His business is a
single person operation and he doesn't lack for work. He made sure I
understood that right at the beginning that he would be unable to get
to it immediately. I told him I did not need it immediately, and he
was good as his word. ;-)

In my last talk with him, I explained that I did not want him to
install the pistons to the crank. I had to mount the drive cog for
the PSRU and it's best to do that with no drag from pistons sliding up
and down in the cylinders.

But I did want him to install the crank, and to use the ARP studs for
the main bearing caps rather than the old bearing bolts, or even
rather than buying new bearing bolts, which he did.

So he wheeled it out the door to my pickup, which I happened to be
driving that day, and together we lifted it into the bed. It was
wrapped with plastic to protect it from rusting in the monsoon like
weather we've been having lately.

In addition, I picked up the two spare heads I'd given him, the
pistons and the rest of the ARP studs for the cylinder heads.

So here's what my $860 has bought me in machine work on the engine.

The block was baked, then shot peened and then blasted clean. That
entire process takes about half an hour. Next, the block was rough
bored to .0028 over so we could see if that would take care of any
cylinder irregularities. It was obvious that the rough bore had
cleaned up the cylinders so we settled on pistons that were a standard
..0030 over. I got those from Wiseco, the company that makes pistons
for a huge number of vendors including many Detroit automakers.

The pistons turned out to be the ones that David Blanton developed
with Wiseco expertise. Basically Blanton explained what he needed and
Wiseco machined them. The design was tested by Blanton for a number
of years and the design was specified for use when converting a Ford
3.8L V-6. Wiseco has a number of these sitting on their shelf, but
they did not happen to have a .0030 over set, so mine got newly
machined.

Will's honing policy is to wait till he actually has the pistons in
hand before honing so that he can mike them to be positive about the
piston clearance. When I handed him the pistons, he was surprised to
see that the clearance was specified at .0060. That's a lot of
clearance, more than twice what you usually see for street cars, but
the engine isn't going in a street car, it will be operated at a
continuous 50% to 75% power setting, and at times will be at 100%
rated power during take off and climb. The clearance reflects racing
and testing experience and we did no second guessing.

In addition to the honing, the block was decked, the bearing surfaces
were trued, the cam bearings were installed and all the casting plugs
replaced.

The heads were bead blasted and degreased. All valves were inspected
and six new intake valves were ordered as none of the originals passed
inspection, they'd been damaged by water corrosion while the engine
sat in storage. The heads needed a bit of grinding and polishing, and
were also planed to make sure that they were completely flat.

Next, the connecting rods were inspected and trued, and the wrist pins
were installed attaching the pistons to the connecting rods. The
wrist pins were a story in themselves. Normally, when you buy
pistons, they come with wrist pins. But mine did not. When I called
Wiseco, they told me that Blanton had made them agree not to send
wrist pins because he believed that the Ford wrist pins were perfectly
adaquate for the job, and they have proven to be. So Wiseco agreed
not to send any wrist pins with Blanton pistons. The problem was I
didn't know this, and had tossed all twelve of them. Now I had to
find some and had a consideable amount of difficulty finding them.
Bruce Frank stepped in to the story here and found some at an auto
parts place near him and made the connection for me.

Within a week, they'd arrived and I handed them to Will. He said that
he had to hone the pistons slightly to get them to fit but they were
otherwise ok.

Finally, I asked Will to gap and fit the rings to the pistons as I did
not have the tools for that and he did. He also does this all day
long so I felt comfortable with his handling this part of the
assembly.

So that's what I offloaded at home, a bare block with all the
necessary machine work done and the crank installed, plus two machined
heads, the pistons and the ARP studs for the cylinder head
installation. In addition, I had the spare heads which I'll use by
mocking up the other engine so I can see how the cowl will work.

This past weekend I fitted the flywheel to the crank and then bolted
the drive cog of the PSRU to the flywheel to check for runnout. I had
bought a custom flywheel from Northwest Aero for the Ford V-6. The
flywheel is a shiny work of art. I cleaned up the cog, fit it to the
flywheel and aligned it to the crank. The crank bolt holes are offset
so that the flywheel can go only one way. In the recesses of my mind,
I'm sort of remembering that this is because the flywheel is part of
the crank balancing. The flywheel has two large holes machined in it
both on the same side so it's apparent that it's weighted to affect
balance.

Anyway, the flywheel includes the ring gear for the starter. The ring
gear sets against a flange machined in the flywheel, and is then held
to the flange with three round head machine screws. The center of the
flywheel has an insert that is bolted to the flywheel. The insert has
nubs on both sides, the one fitting into a hollow in the crankshaft,
the outer fitting into the drive cog.

All fits were tight, and I had to draw the cog and flywheel onto the
crank by starting the bolts, which where were allen head cap screws,
little by little, one at a time working around all six of them.

Eventually the cog and flywheel bottomed and I torqued them to 40 ft
lbs. When I bolt the flywheel on permanently, I'll torque them to the
requested 45 ft lbs.

All this was to check for runnout of the drive cog. You want the
minimum you can achieve. To check, I broke out the old dial guage set
I had which I had not used since I was an auto mechanic some 20 years
ago. It was the type that you clamped to something and then threaded
in an elbow rod and clamped the dial guage to the elbow and adjusted
it to the angle best suited for reading.

Initially I was stymied as the cog was some six inches above the
engine block and the elbow did not reach high enough or over far
enough to get the dial guage inside the cog. But I inserted a long
bolt into the block and clamped the arm to it and found I could now
get the head inside the cog.

It was the inside of the cog that I had to use for this reading as the
outside is ribbed to drive the huge Gates belt. After some initial
false starts, I was able to adjust the dial guage properly and gently
turn the crank using the flywheel and observe the dial guage. I'm
pleased to report that the cog ran pretty much dead true with hardly
any discernable reading. Can't ask for much more than that.

So now I removed the flywheel, the cog remained pressed to the
flywheel, I'll leave it like that for when I install it for good the
next time.

Corky Scott

Barnyard BOb --
August 12th 03, 08:22 PM
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 16:14:27 GMT,
(Corky Scott) wrote:

>The block was baked, then shot peened and then blasted clean. That
>entire process takes about half an hour. Next, the block was rough
>bored to .0028 over so we could see if that would take care of any
>cylinder irregularities. It was obvious that the rough bore had
>cleaned up the cylinders so we settled on pistons that were a standard
>.0030 over. I got those from Wiseco, the company that makes pistons
>for a huge number of vendors including many Detroit automakers.

>Corky Scott
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Could you possibly mean...

..028
..030

28 thousandths
30 thousandths


Barnyard BOb --

Larry Smith
August 12th 03, 08:31 PM
"Corky Scott" > wrote in message
...
> I got a call from the Upper Valley Machine Shop Thursday of last week.
> Will was headed for Watkins Glenn for the Bush Nothern tour and he
> wanted me to come down and get my engine, it was ready to be picked
> up.

Good stuff, Corky. Keep it coming.
>
> Will has had the engine for about a year now. His business is a
> single person operation and he doesn't lack for work. He made sure I
> understood that right at the beginning that he would be unable to get
> to it immediately. I told him I did not need it immediately, and he
> was good as his word. ;-)
>

Larry Smith
August 12th 03, 08:39 PM
"Oinka BOob --" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 16:14:27 GMT,
> (Corky Scott) wrote:
>
> >The block was baked, then shot peened and then blasted clean. That
> >entire process takes about half an hour. Next, the block was rough
> >bored to .0028 over so we could see if that would take care of any
> >cylinder irregularities. It was obvious that the rough bore had
> >cleaned up the cylinders so we settled on pistons that were a standard
> >.0030 over. I got those from Wiseco, the company that makes pistons
> >for a huge number of vendors including many Detroit automakers.
>
> >Corky Scott
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Could you possibly mean...
>
> .028
> .030
>
> 28 thousandths
> 30 thousandths

Probably. For acft cylinders, .003's not enough* and .030's too many.
But then how would Oinka BOob know? He's never bored nuthin' but people.






*Sometimes they'll hone out that much and use oversize rings.

Corky Scott
August 12th 03, 09:05 PM
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 14:22:27 -0500, Barnyard BOb -- >
wrote:

>On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 16:14:27 GMT,
(Corky Scott) wrote:
>
>>The block was baked, then shot peened and then blasted clean. That
>>entire process takes about half an hour. Next, the block was rough
>>bored to .0028 over so we could see if that would take care of any
>>cylinder irregularities. It was obvious that the rough bore had
>>cleaned up the cylinders so we settled on pistons that were a standard
>>.0030 over. I got those from Wiseco, the company that makes pistons
>>for a huge number of vendors including many Detroit automakers.
>
>>Corky Scott
>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>Could you possibly mean...
>
>.028
>.030
>
>28 thousandths
>30 thousandths
>
>
>Barnyard BOb --
>

My apologies. I don't use a micrometer much and every time I do I
have to study and learn it over and over again.

I meant to say that the cylinders were rough bored to twenty eight
thousandths over, then honed to the final size which incorporated the
sixty thousandths piston clearance.

If that's .060" clearance, then that's what I meant to say.

I always read those numbers as first place to the right of the decimal
as tenths, second hundredths and third place thousandths.

So is .060" reading 6 hundredths, or 60 thousandths. Or are they the
same? It's always been a mystery to me.

Corky Scott

Ernesto Sanchez
August 13th 03, 02:58 AM
Do you have any photos yet?
Ernesto
http://home1.gte.net/res0391z/index.html

Corrie
August 13th 03, 07:51 AM
(Corky Scott) wrote in message >...

> I always read those numbers as first place to the right of the decimal
> as tenths, second hundredths and third place thousandths.

That's correct.

> So is .060" reading 6 hundredths, or 60 thousandths. Or are they the
> same? It's always been a mystery to me.

Exactly. One split into ten parts = tenths. A tenth split into ten
parts = hundredths. A hundredth split into ten parts = thousandths.
Ten thousandths = one hundredth. Ten hundredths = one tenth. Ten
tenths = one.

But hey, what's a little factor of ten between friends?

Corrie

Barnyard BOb --
August 13th 03, 11:33 AM
>>Could you possibly mean...
>>
>>.028
>>.030
>>
>>28 thousandths
>>30 thousandths
>>
>>
>>Barnyard BOb --
>>
>
>My apologies. I don't use a micrometer much and every time I do I
>have to study and learn it over and over again.

I sympathize, since I did use a micrometer for many years. <g>
[Got that... big mouth Latchless Larry?]

>I meant to say that the cylinders were rough bored to twenty eight
>thousandths over, then honed to the final size which incorporated the
>sixty thousandths piston clearance.
>
>If that's .060" clearance, then that's what I meant to say.

To throw you another curve....
I'm thinking your piston clearance is really .006 or 6 thousandths.
Clare or Bruce may be chiming in on this one. <g>

>I always read those numbers as first place to the right of the decimal
>as tenths, second hundredths and third place thousandths.
>
>So is .060" reading 6 hundredths, or 60 thousandths. Or are they the
>same? It's always been a mystery to me.
>
>Corky Scott

600 ten thousandths
60 thousandths
6 hundredths
..6 tenths....

All the same thing.


Barnyard Bob -

Gregg Germain
August 13th 03, 12:38 PM
Hey Croky,

What airplane is this for?


--


--- Gregg
"Improvise, adapt, overcome."

Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
Phone: (617) 496-1558

Corky Scott
August 13th 03, 01:44 PM
On 13 Aug 2003 07:38:50 -0400, Gregg Germain
> wrote:

>Hey Croky,
>
> What airplane is this for?
>
>
>--
>
>
>--- Gregg
> "Improvise, adapt, overcome."

>Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
>Phone: (617) 496-1558
>

A Christavia Mk4. It's a largish four place high wing monoplane with
STOL performance. Empty weight is 1350 and gross wt is 2150.

Corky Scott

Corky Scott
August 13th 03, 01:45 PM
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 01:58:48 GMT, "Ernesto Sanchez" >
wrote:

>Do you have any photos yet?
>Ernesto
>http://home1.gte.net/res0391z/index.html
>
>
There are a few photos in the Christavia Yahoo group. I have a few I
took of cog and flywheel I'll upload today if I can find the time.

Corky Scott

Larry Smith
August 13th 03, 02:01 PM
"Corky Scott" > wrote in message
...
> On 13 Aug 2003 07:38:50 -0400, Gregg Germain
> > wrote:
>
> >Hey Croky,
> >
> > What airplane is this for?
> >
> >
> >--
> >
> >
> >--- Gregg
> > "Improvise, adapt, overcome."
>
> >Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
> >Phone: (617) 496-1558
> >
>
> A Christavia Mk4. It's a largish four place high wing monoplane with
> STOL

Ahhhh. Swope Farm and Mile Hi Fields beckon.

I'm envious, Corky.




performance. Empty weight is 1350 and gross wt is 2150.
>
> Corky Scott

Gregg Germain
August 13th 03, 02:07 PM
Corky Scott > wrote:
: On 13 Aug 2003 07:38:50 -0400, Gregg Germain
: > wrote:

:>Hey Croky,
:>
:> What airplane is this for?
:>
:>
:>--
:>
:>
:>--- Gregg
:> "Improvise, adapt, overcome."

:>Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
:>Phone: (617) 496-1558
:>

: A Christavia Mk4. It's a largish four place high wing monoplane with
: STOL performance. Empty weight is 1350 and gross wt is 2150.

: Corky Scott

Corky,

Did a goggle search, saw your web page. Very cool. Good luck with
it.



--- Gregg
"Improvise, adapt, overcome."

Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
Phone: (617) 496-1558

------------ And now a word from our sponsor ----------------------
For a quality mail server, try SurgeMail, easy to install,
fast, efficient and reliable. Run a million users on a standard
PC running NT or Unix without running out of power, use the best!
---- See http://netwinsite.com/sponsor/sponsor_surgemail.htm ----

Barnyard BOb --
August 13th 03, 03:27 PM
>Barnyard BOb -- wrote:
>
>>600 ten thousandths
>>60 thousandths
>>6 hundredths
>>.6 tenths....
>>
>>All the same thing.
>
>When talking about inches, all that stuff you wrote equals 60 mils
>which is a heck of a lot easier to say than "60 thousandths of an
>inch". Heck, I can't even say the word "thousandths" with any degree
>of clarity unless I say it really really slow. There ought to be a
>law against such words. :)
>
>For the record, one mil = 1/1000 of an inch.
>
>And yes, Bob, you are surely correct about the 30 mil overbore and 6
>mil piston/cylinder clearance.
>
>David O -- http://www.AirplaneZone.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Indubitably, Dave, indubitably. 8-)


Barnyard BOb -- Peter Piper picked a peck of pickled peppers

Peter Dohm
August 14th 03, 04:03 AM
Larry Smith wrote:

----snip----

> Ahhhh. Swope Farm and Mile Hi Fields beckon.
>
> I'm envious, Corky.
>

You're a better man than me. I took a look at the pictures and prose earlier in
the thread. Swope farm didn't look too bad since the 134 foot elevation change
is worth a little more than 50 knots, by my calculation, that the engine need
not contribute; although you'd better be ready when you're ready. On the other
hand, I'd rather just watch mile high from a safe distance; or better yet, not
in "real time".

Peter

Bruce A. Frank
August 19th 03, 05:10 AM
Though "thousandths" is the correct word most of the machinists I've
worked with just say "thousands"

--
Bruce A. Frank



David O wrote:
>
> Barnyard BOb -- > wrote:
>
> >600 ten thousandths
> >60 thousandths
> >6 hundredths
> >.6 tenths....
> >
> >All the same thing.
>
> When talking about inches, all that stuff you wrote equals 60 mils
> which is a heck of a lot easier to say than "60 thousandths of an
> inch". Heck, I can't even say the word "thousandths" with any degree
> of clarity unless I say it really really slow. There ought to be a
> law against such words. :)
>
> For the record, one mil = 1/1000 of an inch.
>
> And yes, Bob, you are surely correct about the 30 mil overbore and 6
> mil piston/cylinder clearance.
>
> David O -- http://www.AirplaneZone.com

Model Flyer
August 19th 03, 03:06 PM
"Bruce A. Frank" > wrote in message
...
> Though "thousandths" is the correct word most of the machinists
I've
> worked with just say "thousands"
>

Oddly I always said, "thow" ie. "30 thow"
--

..
--
Cheers,
Jonathan Lowe
modelflyer at antispam dot net

Antispam trap in place


> --
> Bruce A. Frank
>
>
>
> David O wrote:
> >
> > Barnyard BOb -- > wrote:
> >
> > >600 ten thousandths
> > >60 thousandths
> > >6 hundredths
> > >.6 tenths....
> > >
> > >All the same thing.
> >
> > When talking about inches, all that stuff you wrote equals 60
mils
> > which is a heck of a lot easier to say than "60 thousandths of an
> > inch". Heck, I can't even say the word "thousandths" with any
degree
> > of clarity unless I say it really really slow. There ought to be
a
> > law against such words. :)
> >
> > For the record, one mil = 1/1000 of an inch.
> >
> > And yes, Bob, you are surely correct about the 30 mil overbore
and 6
> > mil piston/cylinder clearance.
> >
> > David O -- http://www.AirplaneZone.com

clare @ snyder.on .ca
August 21st 03, 02:29 AM
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 05:33:03 -0500, Barnyard BOb -- >
wrote:

>
>>>Could you possibly mean...
>>>
>>>.028
>>>.030
>>>
>>>28 thousandths
>>>30 thousandths
>>>
>>>
>>>Barnyard BOb --
>>>
>>
>>My apologies. I don't use a micrometer much and every time I do I
>>have to study and learn it over and over again.
>
>I sympathize, since I did use a micrometer for many years. <g>
>[Got that... big mouth Latchless Larry?]
>
>>I meant to say that the cylinders were rough bored to twenty eight
>>thousandths over, then honed to the final size which incorporated the
>>sixty thousandths piston clearance.
>>
>>If that's .060" clearance, then that's what I meant to say.
>
>To throw you another curve....
>I'm thinking your piston clearance is really .006 or 6 thousandths.
>Clare or Bruce may be chiming in on this one. <g>
>
Standard "rule of thumb" for engines you had no specs for was 2 thou
plus 2 thou per inch diameter. Which would be roughly 8 thou.
Camground pistons were usually fitted a bit tighter. Like about half
or less.
Factory spec for a 3.8 is 0.0014 to 0.0028

clare @ snyder.on .ca
August 21st 03, 02:30 AM
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 07:23:47 -0400, David O
> wrote:

>"Bruce A. Frank" > wrote:
>
>>Though "thousandths" is the correct word most of the machinists I've
>>worked with just say "thousands"
>
>Yes, in the right context "thousands" sounds like a lazy "thousandths"
>anyway. Given my trouble saying "thousandths", I'll have to remember
>that.
>
>David O -- http://www.AirplaneZone.com
>
Every machinist or mechanic I've ever met just calls them Thous.

David O
August 21st 03, 12:04 PM
clare @ snyder.on .ca wrote:

>>Yes, in the right context "thousands" sounds like a lazy "thousandths"
>>anyway. Given my trouble saying "thousandths", I'll have to remember
>>that.
>>
>>David O -- http://www.AirplaneZone.com


>Every machinist or mechanic I've ever met just calls them Thous.

I've heard both used in my somewhat limited exposure to that world.
Now if I started saying "thousandths" or "thous" instead of "mils" in
my professional work (EE, pc board fab, etc), I'd get strange looks
indeed. "Mil" has "of an inch" in the definition which pleases my
engineering sensibilities.

Along similar lines, before "Hertz" was adopted by SI in the late
'60s, most folks just said "kilocycles" instead of "kilocycles per
second". Hertz has "per second" as part of its definition which also
pleases my engineering sensibilities. A lot of hams, however, were
miffed when their beloved "kay cee" was supplanted through a tribute
to a dead German physicist.

David O -- http://www.AirplaneZone.com

Google