Michael Baldwin, Bruce
May 3rd 07, 10:21 AM
Completely anal retentive kookdancing queen, Dickless Davie
the "irrelevaant" Ignoranus, whined and
tholed like the antagonistic arsehole that he is:
> Michael Baldwin Bruce writes:
You forgot the comma again, Dickless. What is it with you and commas?
> 8102> What a Shocktakovich!
>
> 8103> Shazam!
>
> 8103> Anything would make her day.
>
> 8103> What about my back?
>
> 8104> Completely anal retentive kookdancing queen, Dickless Davie
> 8104> the "irrelevaant" Ignoranus, whined and
> 8104> tholed like the antagonistic arsehole that he is:
>
> 8104> Shut up,
>
> Practice what you peach, Bruce.
What does fruit have to do with classical music, Dickless?
> 8104> Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems,
> Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Still suffering from atrribution problems,
Dickless?
> 8104> Ding!
>
> I'm well aware that you're a ding-a-ling, Bruce. No need to tell me
> about it, Bruce.
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? There's nobody here by that name. And you
are a ding-aling.
> 8104> Shut up,
>
> Practice what you peach, Bruce.
What does fruit have to do with classical music, Dickless?
> 8104> Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems,
> Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Still suffering from atrribution problems,
Dickless?
> 8105> Is Vic there?
>
> What does your ongoing "kookdance" have to do with classical music, Bruce?
> As usual, I won't get any explanation for the alleged relevance to classical
> music from Bruce.
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? There's nobody here by that name.
Now, what is the relevance of fruit to classical music, Dickless?
> ah thole writes:
>
> 1249> ALL HAEL TEH MIGHTY FROUP COUNT!!1!
>
> 1249> ALL HAEL TEH MIGHT POAST COUNT!!!!
>
> 1250> Hi, Alexa!
>
> 1251> I hate rayon.
>
> 1252> And no stupid top-posting either.
>
> 1253> Quiet ko0k.
>
> 1254> Got . . . so . . . old . . . .
>
> 1255> Yup.
>
> Hypocritically, you didn't take it to email, ah. No surprise
> there, really.
What a pair of kooks.
> writes:
>
> 119> But sometimes you post there.
>
> Non sequitur.
>
> 119> Why should it have any relevance to classical music when most of what
> 119> you quoted was not posted here?
>
> How much is "most", tallis?
>
> 119> It also had nothing to do with you,
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 119> so why did you put it in the digest?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, tallis?
>
> 120> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,rec.music.classical
>
> 120> Cuter than you ever were.
>
> What does that have to do with classical music, tallis?
>
> 120> Hahahaha.
>
> What does your laughter have to do with classical music, tallis?
>
> 120> That must have made your day.
>
> What does that have to do with classical music, tallis?
>
> 120> He's back.
>
> Courtesy of you, tallis?
>
> 121> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical,alt.usenet.kooks
>
> 121> Thanks again for sharing his brilliance with rec.music.classical,
> 121> which he usually leaves off his newsgroup list.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition of any brilliance being demonstrated
> by Deco, tallis.
>
> 121> It is brilliant in comparison to your contribution.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 121> When was the last time that you actually talked about music here.
>
> Non sequitur.
>
> 121> At least I have the excuse of youth
>
> Immaturity is a better description, tallis. I've seen youth that are
> far more mature than you, tallis.
>
> 121> - what excuse do you have for your immaturity, Tholen?
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
> 121> Of course it's not certain
>
> That's not the way you stated it, tallis.
>
> 121> - I could get hit by a bus on my way home -
> 121> but people in my familly usually live to at least 90.
>
> At what age did they stop being trolls, tallis?
>
> 121> Yes, kooky, I was.
>
> And kooky you still are, tallis.
>
> 121> Which I wasn't.
>
> Thus I was correct, tallis.
>
> 121> I would never call Deco "kooky":
>
> Classic illogic on your part, tallis.
>
> 121> you're the one with all the awards.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 121> presupposition failure
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 121> on your part
>
> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 121> The point was not off-topic messages, but a test post in the wrong
> 121> group.
>
> On what basis do you make that claim, tallis?
>
> 121> Strange idea of fairness you have.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 121> How do you think she feels, or do you even care?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, tallis?
>
> 121> She's a music student.
>
> Non sequitur.
>
> 121> on your part
>
> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 121> Still beating your wife, Tholen?
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
> 121> Ok, most.
>
> On what basis do you speak for most, tallis?
>
> 121> on your part
>
> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 121> So what do you call the way you go after Deco and Bruce?
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
> 121> Still beating your wife, Tholen?
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
> 121> Blow thy horn, hunter....
>
> Non sequitur.
>
> 121> What does it have to do with you?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, tallis?
>
> 121> It should not be included in the digest.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 121> What does it have to do with you?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, tallis?
>
> 121> What does it have to do with you?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, tallis?
>
> 121> You tell us
>
> Illogical, given that I can't read your mind, tallis. Classic
> evasion of the question on your part, tallis.
>
> 121> - you're the one who mentioned th astronomy club in rmcr.
>
> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, tallis?
> The meeting was simultaneous with a Rostropovich concert. The
> two activities were competing for audience. That much was quite
> clear. Amazing that it had to be spelled out for you.
What does that have to do with classical music, Dickless?
> David Gray Porter writes:
>
> 806> Seek professional help yourself before you suggest it to anyone else.
>
> You are the one who posted the test, Porter. Nobody else did.
> Clearly, you are the one with the obsession, Porter. Someone
> else seeking professional help will do nothing to cure you of
> your obsession, Porter.
>
> Unfortunately, there is probably no cure for the illogic of your
> response, Porter.
Shut up, Dickless.
> alias # today total year 3 year 2 year 1
> -------------- ------- ----- ----- ------ ------
> deco 13 4062 3722 2268 0
> bruce 4 3158 2867 1979 0
Ding!
> ah 7 624 320 112 0
> honestjohn 445 90 0 0
> kyle 328 313 0 0
> hucker 282 44 4 2
> clarinet.fan 204 0 0 0
> double-a 147 145 1 0
> haslam 139 534 198 677
> tallis 3 111 0 0 0
> snarky 103 0 0 0
> lora 70 0 0 0
> demon 60 11 0 0
> hunt 47 0 0 0
> text 45 0 0 0
> crightingale 38 0 0 0
> mars 38 0 0 0
> loonie 35 178 62 0
> "nightingale" 31 0 59 0
> bookman 26 44 15 4
> freespeechstore 26 2 0 0
> bisectional 24 154 377 0
> odd 23 0 0 0
> puddleduck 23 0 0 0
> hagar 22 1 0 0
> kadaitcha 20 40 13 0
> nightbat 19 37 3 0
> tom 18 0 0 0
> wehrung 18 27 75 262
> crane 16 0 0 0
> hillstrom 16 31 0 0
> nemo 16 0 0 0
> warhol 16 0 0 0
> h0plibbb_oili 14 26 0 0
> crighton 13 0 0 0
> elizabot 11 6 51 0
> kirk 11 0 0 0
> nightingale^2 10 10 0 0
> krp 9 2 0 0
> pluto 8 0 0 0
> porsche 8 0 0 0
> buzzard 7 0 0 0
> me 7 0 0 0
> schmidt 7 0 0 0
> android 6 0 0 0
> aratzio 6 54 133 0
> holly 6 0 0 0
> neill 6 0 0 0
> newsgroup 6 0 0 0
> raoul 6 0 0 0
> rien 6 0 0 0
> homintern 5 0 0 0
> hubert 5 0 0 0
> monaghan 5 15 4 0
> paul 5 0 0 0
> porter 1 5 37 0 163
> professeur 5 0 0 0
> sleepyhead 5 0 0 0
> bruening 4 0 0 0
> ross 4 62 319 10
> b s 3 0 0 0
> cujo 3 9 2 0
> davie 3 14 105 0
> dog3 3 0 0 0
> goat 3 0 0 0
> guth 3 0 0 0
> igor 3 0 0 0
> malloy 3 47 30 1
> prufrock 3 0 0 0
> singer 3 17 0 0
> bartlo 2 0 1 303
> byrd 2 0 0 10
> craig 2 0 0 0
> dakkash 2 0 0 0
> daniels 2 5 67 165
> fEkLaaar 2 0 0 0
> gym 2 0 0 0
> holmes 2 0 0 0
> kolle 2 3 20 264
> mdhjwh 2 0 0 0
> pervert 2 0 0 0
> pounder 2 0 0 0
> prai jei 2 3 9 11
> sameasb4 2 0 0 0
> snuhwolf5150 2 0 0 0
> stone 2 25 8 0
> teddysnips 2 0 0 0
> twittering 2 36 10 0
> .@. 1 0 0 0
> baba 1 0 0 0
> balmer 1 6 0 0
> blade 1 0 0 0
> bloamy 1 0 0 0
> blu 1 0 0 0
> dizzy 1 132 135 522
> eBayer 1 0 0 0
> fjiluk 1 0 0 0
> gamble 1 5 1 13
> granzeau 1 0 0 0
> hammes 1 0 0 0
> harding 1 0 0 0
> harrington 1 0 0 0
> harry 1 0 0 0
> ilechko 1 0 0 0
> imposter 1 18 12 0
> jay 1 0 0 0
> jones 1 0 0 0
> lamey 1 0 0 0
> leach 1 39 0 0
> leyland 1 0 0 0
> lincoln 1 0 0 0
> lord 1 0 0 0
> marko 1 0 0 0
> meow 1 1 4 0
> metro 1 0 0 0
> nightmist 1 0 0 0
> plow 1 4 0 0
> podguszer 1 0 0 1
> requiem 1 0 0 0
> robb 1 0 0 0
> rock 1 0 0 0
> roofshadow 1 0 0 0
> ryan 1 0 0 0
> sanchez 1 0 0 0
> santos 1 0 0 0
> silverfin 1 0 0 0
> steveo 1 0 0 0
> tracey 1 0 0 0
> wake 1 0 0 0
> widdershins 1 11 0 4
> yu 1 0 0 0
> -------------- ------- ----- ----- ------ ------
> 131 28 10549 11687 9100 10033
Shut up, Dickless.
the "irrelevaant" Ignoranus, whined and
tholed like the antagonistic arsehole that he is:
> Michael Baldwin Bruce writes:
You forgot the comma again, Dickless. What is it with you and commas?
> 8102> What a Shocktakovich!
>
> 8103> Shazam!
>
> 8103> Anything would make her day.
>
> 8103> What about my back?
>
> 8104> Completely anal retentive kookdancing queen, Dickless Davie
> 8104> the "irrelevaant" Ignoranus, whined and
> 8104> tholed like the antagonistic arsehole that he is:
>
> 8104> Shut up,
>
> Practice what you peach, Bruce.
What does fruit have to do with classical music, Dickless?
> 8104> Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems,
> Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Still suffering from atrribution problems,
Dickless?
> 8104> Ding!
>
> I'm well aware that you're a ding-a-ling, Bruce. No need to tell me
> about it, Bruce.
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? There's nobody here by that name. And you
are a ding-aling.
> 8104> Shut up,
>
> Practice what you peach, Bruce.
What does fruit have to do with classical music, Dickless?
> 8104> Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems,
> Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Still suffering from atrribution problems,
Dickless?
> 8105> Is Vic there?
>
> What does your ongoing "kookdance" have to do with classical music, Bruce?
> As usual, I won't get any explanation for the alleged relevance to classical
> music from Bruce.
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? There's nobody here by that name.
Now, what is the relevance of fruit to classical music, Dickless?
> ah thole writes:
>
> 1249> ALL HAEL TEH MIGHTY FROUP COUNT!!1!
>
> 1249> ALL HAEL TEH MIGHT POAST COUNT!!!!
>
> 1250> Hi, Alexa!
>
> 1251> I hate rayon.
>
> 1252> And no stupid top-posting either.
>
> 1253> Quiet ko0k.
>
> 1254> Got . . . so . . . old . . . .
>
> 1255> Yup.
>
> Hypocritically, you didn't take it to email, ah. No surprise
> there, really.
What a pair of kooks.
> writes:
>
> 119> But sometimes you post there.
>
> Non sequitur.
>
> 119> Why should it have any relevance to classical music when most of what
> 119> you quoted was not posted here?
>
> How much is "most", tallis?
>
> 119> It also had nothing to do with you,
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 119> so why did you put it in the digest?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, tallis?
>
> 120> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,rec.music.classical
>
> 120> Cuter than you ever were.
>
> What does that have to do with classical music, tallis?
>
> 120> Hahahaha.
>
> What does your laughter have to do with classical music, tallis?
>
> 120> That must have made your day.
>
> What does that have to do with classical music, tallis?
>
> 120> He's back.
>
> Courtesy of you, tallis?
>
> 121> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical,alt.usenet.kooks
>
> 121> Thanks again for sharing his brilliance with rec.music.classical,
> 121> which he usually leaves off his newsgroup list.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition of any brilliance being demonstrated
> by Deco, tallis.
>
> 121> It is brilliant in comparison to your contribution.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 121> When was the last time that you actually talked about music here.
>
> Non sequitur.
>
> 121> At least I have the excuse of youth
>
> Immaturity is a better description, tallis. I've seen youth that are
> far more mature than you, tallis.
>
> 121> - what excuse do you have for your immaturity, Tholen?
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
> 121> Of course it's not certain
>
> That's not the way you stated it, tallis.
>
> 121> - I could get hit by a bus on my way home -
> 121> but people in my familly usually live to at least 90.
>
> At what age did they stop being trolls, tallis?
>
> 121> Yes, kooky, I was.
>
> And kooky you still are, tallis.
>
> 121> Which I wasn't.
>
> Thus I was correct, tallis.
>
> 121> I would never call Deco "kooky":
>
> Classic illogic on your part, tallis.
>
> 121> you're the one with all the awards.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 121> presupposition failure
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 121> on your part
>
> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 121> The point was not off-topic messages, but a test post in the wrong
> 121> group.
>
> On what basis do you make that claim, tallis?
>
> 121> Strange idea of fairness you have.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 121> How do you think she feels, or do you even care?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, tallis?
>
> 121> She's a music student.
>
> Non sequitur.
>
> 121> on your part
>
> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 121> Still beating your wife, Tholen?
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
> 121> Ok, most.
>
> On what basis do you speak for most, tallis?
>
> 121> on your part
>
> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 121> So what do you call the way you go after Deco and Bruce?
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
> 121> Still beating your wife, Tholen?
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
> 121> Blow thy horn, hunter....
>
> Non sequitur.
>
> 121> What does it have to do with you?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, tallis?
>
> 121> It should not be included in the digest.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 121> What does it have to do with you?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, tallis?
>
> 121> What does it have to do with you?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, tallis?
>
> 121> You tell us
>
> Illogical, given that I can't read your mind, tallis. Classic
> evasion of the question on your part, tallis.
>
> 121> - you're the one who mentioned th astronomy club in rmcr.
>
> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, tallis?
> The meeting was simultaneous with a Rostropovich concert. The
> two activities were competing for audience. That much was quite
> clear. Amazing that it had to be spelled out for you.
What does that have to do with classical music, Dickless?
> David Gray Porter writes:
>
> 806> Seek professional help yourself before you suggest it to anyone else.
>
> You are the one who posted the test, Porter. Nobody else did.
> Clearly, you are the one with the obsession, Porter. Someone
> else seeking professional help will do nothing to cure you of
> your obsession, Porter.
>
> Unfortunately, there is probably no cure for the illogic of your
> response, Porter.
Shut up, Dickless.
> alias # today total year 3 year 2 year 1
> -------------- ------- ----- ----- ------ ------
> deco 13 4062 3722 2268 0
> bruce 4 3158 2867 1979 0
Ding!
> ah 7 624 320 112 0
> honestjohn 445 90 0 0
> kyle 328 313 0 0
> hucker 282 44 4 2
> clarinet.fan 204 0 0 0
> double-a 147 145 1 0
> haslam 139 534 198 677
> tallis 3 111 0 0 0
> snarky 103 0 0 0
> lora 70 0 0 0
> demon 60 11 0 0
> hunt 47 0 0 0
> text 45 0 0 0
> crightingale 38 0 0 0
> mars 38 0 0 0
> loonie 35 178 62 0
> "nightingale" 31 0 59 0
> bookman 26 44 15 4
> freespeechstore 26 2 0 0
> bisectional 24 154 377 0
> odd 23 0 0 0
> puddleduck 23 0 0 0
> hagar 22 1 0 0
> kadaitcha 20 40 13 0
> nightbat 19 37 3 0
> tom 18 0 0 0
> wehrung 18 27 75 262
> crane 16 0 0 0
> hillstrom 16 31 0 0
> nemo 16 0 0 0
> warhol 16 0 0 0
> h0plibbb_oili 14 26 0 0
> crighton 13 0 0 0
> elizabot 11 6 51 0
> kirk 11 0 0 0
> nightingale^2 10 10 0 0
> krp 9 2 0 0
> pluto 8 0 0 0
> porsche 8 0 0 0
> buzzard 7 0 0 0
> me 7 0 0 0
> schmidt 7 0 0 0
> android 6 0 0 0
> aratzio 6 54 133 0
> holly 6 0 0 0
> neill 6 0 0 0
> newsgroup 6 0 0 0
> raoul 6 0 0 0
> rien 6 0 0 0
> homintern 5 0 0 0
> hubert 5 0 0 0
> monaghan 5 15 4 0
> paul 5 0 0 0
> porter 1 5 37 0 163
> professeur 5 0 0 0
> sleepyhead 5 0 0 0
> bruening 4 0 0 0
> ross 4 62 319 10
> b s 3 0 0 0
> cujo 3 9 2 0
> davie 3 14 105 0
> dog3 3 0 0 0
> goat 3 0 0 0
> guth 3 0 0 0
> igor 3 0 0 0
> malloy 3 47 30 1
> prufrock 3 0 0 0
> singer 3 17 0 0
> bartlo 2 0 1 303
> byrd 2 0 0 10
> craig 2 0 0 0
> dakkash 2 0 0 0
> daniels 2 5 67 165
> fEkLaaar 2 0 0 0
> gym 2 0 0 0
> holmes 2 0 0 0
> kolle 2 3 20 264
> mdhjwh 2 0 0 0
> pervert 2 0 0 0
> pounder 2 0 0 0
> prai jei 2 3 9 11
> sameasb4 2 0 0 0
> snuhwolf5150 2 0 0 0
> stone 2 25 8 0
> teddysnips 2 0 0 0
> twittering 2 36 10 0
> .@. 1 0 0 0
> baba 1 0 0 0
> balmer 1 6 0 0
> blade 1 0 0 0
> bloamy 1 0 0 0
> blu 1 0 0 0
> dizzy 1 132 135 522
> eBayer 1 0 0 0
> fjiluk 1 0 0 0
> gamble 1 5 1 13
> granzeau 1 0 0 0
> hammes 1 0 0 0
> harding 1 0 0 0
> harrington 1 0 0 0
> harry 1 0 0 0
> ilechko 1 0 0 0
> imposter 1 18 12 0
> jay 1 0 0 0
> jones 1 0 0 0
> lamey 1 0 0 0
> leach 1 39 0 0
> leyland 1 0 0 0
> lincoln 1 0 0 0
> lord 1 0 0 0
> marko 1 0 0 0
> meow 1 1 4 0
> metro 1 0 0 0
> nightmist 1 0 0 0
> plow 1 4 0 0
> podguszer 1 0 0 1
> requiem 1 0 0 0
> robb 1 0 0 0
> rock 1 0 0 0
> roofshadow 1 0 0 0
> ryan 1 0 0 0
> sanchez 1 0 0 0
> santos 1 0 0 0
> silverfin 1 0 0 0
> steveo 1 0 0 0
> tracey 1 0 0 0
> wake 1 0 0 0
> widdershins 1 11 0 4
> yu 1 0 0 0
> -------------- ------- ----- ----- ------ ------
> 131 28 10549 11687 9100 10033
Shut up, Dickless.