Michael Baldwin, Bruce
May 5th 07, 02:55 PM
Completely anal retentive kookdancing queen, Dickless Davie
the "irrelevaant" Ignoranus, whined and
tholed like the antagonistic arsehole that he is:
> Michael Baldwin Bruce writes:
Having attribution problems again, Dickless?
> 8106> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings,rec.music.classical ,demon.local,ne.weather,rec.aviation.products
Thanks for making that easy for me, Dickless.
> 8106> And you wonder why I went in Haydn.
What? No witty reparte, Dickless?
> 8107> Completely anal retentive kookdancing queen, Dickless Davie
> 8107> the "irrelevaant" Ignoranus, whined and
> 8107> tholed like the antagonistic arsehole that he is:
>
> Who is "Dickless Davie ", Bruce? Still suffering
> from attribution problems, Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you still suffering from chronic
stupidity?
> 8107> You forgot the comma again, Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems,
> Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you still suffering from chronic
stupidity?
> 8107> What is it with you and commas?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, Bruce?
Note: no response.
> 8107> What does fruit have to do with classical music,
>
> Non sequitur.
Classic evasion.
> 8107> Dickless?
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems,
> Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you still suffering from chronic
stupidity?
> 8107> Who is "Bruce",
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, Bruce?
Note: no response.
> 8107> Dickless?
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems,
> Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you still suffering from chronic
stupidity?
> 8107> Still suffering from atrribution problems,
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
On your part, Dickless.
> 8107> Dickless?
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems,
> Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you still suffering from chronic
stupidity?
> 8107> Who is "Bruce",
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, Bruce?
Classic evasion.
> 8107> Dickless?
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems,
> Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you still suffering from chronic
stupidity?
> 8107> There's nobody here by that name.
>
> What does that to do with classical music, Bruce?
Classic evasion.
> 8107> And you are a ding-aling.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part, Dickless.
> 8107> What does fruit have to do with classical music,
>
> Non sequitur.
Yes, you are non sequitur, Dickless.
> 8107> Dickless?
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems,
> Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you still suffering from chronic
stupidity?
> 8107> Who is "Bruce",
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you still suffering from chronic
stupidity?
> 8107> Dickless?
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems,
> Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you still suffering from chronic
stupidity?
> 8107> Still suffering from atrribution problems,
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
On your part, Dickless.
> 8107> Dickless?
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems,
> Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you still suffering from chronic
stupidity?
> 8107> Who is "Bruce",
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, Bruce?
Classic evasion.
> 8107> Dickless?
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems,
> Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you still suffering from chronic
stupidity?
> 8107> There's nobody here by that name.
>
> What does that to do with classical music, Bruce?
Non sequitur.
> 8107> Now, what is the relevance of fruit to classical music,
>
> Non sequitur.
On your part.
> 8107> Dickless?
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems,
> Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you still suffering from chronic
stupidity?
> 8107> What a pair of kooks.
>
> Art Deco and Michael Baldwin Bruce.
What does that have to do with classical music, Dickless?
> 8107> What does that have to do with classical music,
>
> The meeting was simultaneous with a Rostropovich concert. The
> two activities were competing for audience. That much was quite
> clear. Amazing that it had to be spelled out for you, Bruce. Again.
> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Bruce?
Non sequitur.
> 8107> Dickless?
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems,
> Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you still suffering from chronic
stupidity?
> 8107> Shut up,
>
> Practice what you preach, Bruce.
Yes, you should, Dickless. Now, who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you
still suffering from chronic stupidity?
> 8107> Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems,
> Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you still suffering from chronic
stupidity?
> 8107> Ding!
>
> I'm well aware that you're a ding-a-ling, Bruce. No need to tell me
> about it.
Non sequitur and rather ironic.
> 8107> Shut up,
>
> Practice what you preach, Bruce.
Yes, you should, Dickless.
> 8107> Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems,
> Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you still suffering from chronic
stupidity?
> 8108> Goat ****er!
>
> 8109> So how does Foamy fish for ice anyway?
>
> 8110> The kid seems to be enjoying it. I wonder why?
>
> What does your ongoing "kookdance" have to do with classical music, Bruce?
> As usual, I won't get any explanation for the alleged relevance to classical
> music from Bruce.
What does your inclusion of posts not posted to rec.music.classical
have to do with classical music, Dickless?
> "Kooks don't think rationally, Bruce."
> --Michael Baldwin Bruce
Indeed.
> Phil Kyle writes:
>
> 710> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.fan.a rt-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.astronomy,demon.local,al t.fan.steveleyland,alt.astronomy
>
> 710> ALL HAEL TEH MIGHT POAST COUNT!!!!
>
> 711> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.fan.a rt-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.astronomy,demon.local,al t.fan.steveleyland,alt.astronomy
>
> 711> ALL HAEL TEH MIGHT POAST COUNT!!!!
>
> 712> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advo cacy
>
> 712> Shuttup, Protobrain.
>
> 713> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advo cacy
>
> 713> Shuttup, Protobrain.
>
> 714> Newsgroups: alt.satellite.tv.europe,alt.usage.english,demon.lo cal,uk.media.radio.bbc-r4,aus.invest,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.research,comp.os.o s2.advocacy
>
> 714> Quiet ko0k.
>
> 715> Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan. rush-limbaugh,alt.bad.clams,demon.local,alt.usenet.kook s,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
> 715> Quiet ko0k.
>
> 716> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local
>
> 716> But...the...light...is....so....inviting
>
> 717> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advo cacy
>
> 717> And no stupid top-posting either.
>
> 718> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advo cacy
>
> 718> And no stupid top-posting either.
>
> 719> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advo cacy
>
> 719> And no stupid top-posting either.
>
> 720> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local
>
> 720> Yup.
>
> 721> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local
>
> 721> Yup.
>
> 722> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local
>
> 722> They're a bunch of knocked off Germans.
>
> What does that have to do with OS/2, Kyle?
Shut up, Dickless.
> "Nightingale" > writes:
>
> 86> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,rec.music.classical
>
> 86> What are you, an accountant or something?
>
> 86> You're erroneously presupposing the existance of any logic at all.
>
> 87> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical
>
> 87> Where is the irony?
>
> In that "Lora" is an "antagonistic maroon", Nightingale.
>
> 87> Seriously, Tholen, it was a joke.
>
> Classic rationalization of Lora's hypocrisy.
>
> 87> I can't predict everything about you,
>
> Irrelevant, given that I didn't ask you to, Nightingale.
>
> 87> but you are quite consistent in some ways, like digesting
> 87> off-topic posts even from people who tried to be friends,
>
> Do you play favorites, Nightingale? For example, do you tell
> non-friends that they shouldn't drink and drive, but keep quiet
> when your friends do it?
>
> 87> and taking bait from trolls like Porter.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
> 87> Another joke - perhaps not a very good one, but perfectly sequitur to
> 87> MBB's groaner.
>
> Classic rationalization of Lora's hypocrisy.
>
> 87> What makes you think I was talking about him?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, Nightingale?
>
> 87> It was a reply to him talking about somebody else - guess who ;-)
>
> What does your request have to do with classical music, Nightingale?
>
> 87> You posted things here that we would not have otherwise seen - that's
> 87> wider distribution.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 87> Sarchasm noted.
>
> What is "Sarchasm", Nightingale?
>
> 87> True, but what purpose is served by reading and replying to his bait?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, Nightingale?
>
> 87> Unless you are an Ives fanatic, he has very little to say that is
> 87> worth reading.
>
> Hence he's desperate for attention. That's one way to explain his
> obsession.
>
> 87> And you, a kook in denial.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 87> It's actually your words that I was quoting.
>
> The quotation was from Lora, Nightingale, not you. Still suffering from
> reading comprehension problems, Nightingale?
>
> 87> What did you mean by writing that?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, Nightingale?
>
> 87> And we would not have seen most of them without your reposting.
>
> Who are you speaking for when you say "we", Nightingale?
>
> 87> Thanks.
>
> What does your thanks have to do with classical music, Nightingale?
>
> 87> You didn't admit it
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
> 87> - my point is proven.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
> 87> I show up every once in a while when I'm not busy with more
> 87> interesting things - you've been doing it for many years.
>
> Non sequitur, given that the discussion was about "Lora", not about
> "Nightingale", Nightingale.
>
> 87> Who's obsessed?
>
> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Nightingale?
> Clearly Porter is obsessed. But what does your question have to do
> with classical music, Nightingale?
>
> 87> You could just plonk him.
>
> Illogical, given that plonking won't prevent him from starting new
> threads with content irrelevant to the newsgroup, Nightingale.
And how does that affect your ability to plonk him, Dickless?
Now, what does your inability to plonk someone have to do with
classical music, Dickless?
> alias # today total year 3 year 2 year 1
> -------------- ------- ----- ----- ------ ------
> deco 17 4115 3722 2268 0
> bruce 5 3163 2867 1979 0
Ole!
> ah 624 320 112 0
> honestjohn 445 90 0 0
> kyle 13 357 313 0 0
> hucker 282 44 4 2
> clarinet.fan 204 0 0 0
> double-a 147 145 1 0
> haslam 139 534 198 677
> tallis 111 0 0 0
> snarky 103 0 0 0
> lora 80 0 0 0
> demon 60 11 0 0
> hunt 47 0 0 0
> text 45 0 0 0
> crightingale 38 0 0 0
> mars 38 0 0 0
> loonie 35 178 62 0
> "nightingale" 2 33 0 59 0
> bookman 26 44 15 4
> freespeechstore 26 2 0 0
> bisectional 24 154 377 0
> odd 23 0 0 0
> puddleduck 23 0 0 0
> hagar 22 1 0 0
> kadaitcha 20 40 13 0
> nightbat 19 37 3 0
> tom 18 0 0 0
> wehrung 18 27 75 262
> crane 16 0 0 0
> hillstrom 16 31 0 0
> nemo 16 0 0 0
> warhol 16 0 0 0
> h0plibbb_oili 14 26 0 0
> crighton 13 0 0 0
> elizabot 11 6 51 0
> kirk 11 0 0 0
> nightingale^2 10 10 0 0
> krp 9 2 0 0
> porter 9 37 0 163
> pluto 8 0 0 0
> porsche 8 0 0 0
> buzzard 7 0 0 0
> me 7 0 0 0
> schmidt 7 0 0 0
> android 6 0 0 0
> aratzio 6 54 133 0
> holly 6 0 0 0
> neill 6 0 0 0
> newsgroup 6 0 0 0
> raoul 6 0 0 0
> rien 6 0 0 0
> homintern 5 0 0 0
> hubert 5 0 0 0
> monaghan 5 15 4 0
> paul 5 0 0 0
> professeur 5 0 0 0
> sleepyhead 5 0 0 0
> bruening 4 0 0 0
> ross 4 62 319 10
> b s 3 0 0 0
> cujo 3 9 2 0
> davie 3 14 105 0
> dog3 3 0 0 0
> goat 3 0 0 0
> guth 3 0 0 0
> igor 3 0 0 0
> malloy 3 47 30 1
> prufrock 3 0 0 0
> singer 3 17 0 0
> bartlo 2 0 1 303
> byrd 2 0 0 10
> craig 2 0 0 0
> dakkash 2 0 0 0
> daniels 2 5 67 165
> fEkLaaar 2 0 0 0
> gym 2 0 0 0
> holmes 2 0 0 0
> kolle 2 3 20 264
> mdhjwh 2 0 0 0
> pervert 2 0 0 0
> pounder 2 0 0 0
> prai jei 2 3 9 11
> sameasb4 2 0 0 0
> snuhwolf5150 2 0 0 0
> stone 2 25 8 0
> teddysnips 2 0 0 0
> twittering 2 36 10 0
> .@. 1 0 0 0
> baba 1 0 0 0
> balmer 1 6 0 0
> blade 1 0 0 0
> bloamy 1 0 0 0
> blu 1 0 0 0
> dizzy 1 132 135 522
> eBayer 1 0 0 0
> fjiluk 1 0 0 0
> gamble 1 5 1 13
> granzeau 1 0 0 0
> hammes 1 0 0 0
> harding 1 0 0 0
> harrington 1 0 0 0
> harry 1 0 0 0
> ilechko 1 0 0 0
> imposter 1 18 12 0
> jay 1 0 0 0
> jones 1 0 0 0
> lamey 1 0 0 0
> leach 1 39 0 0
> leyland 1 0 0 0
> lincoln 1 0 0 0
> lookingglass 1 0 0 0
> lord 1 0 0 0
> marko 1 0 0 0
> meow 1 1 4 0
> metro 1 0 0 0
> nightmist 1 0 0 0
> plow 1 4 0 0
> podguszer 1 0 0 1
> requiem 1 0 0 0
> robb 1 0 0 0
> rock 1 0 0 0
> roofshadow 1 0 0 0
> ryan 1 0 0 0
> sanchez 1 0 0 0
> santos 1 0 0 0
> silverfin 1 0 0 0
> steveo 1 0 0 0
> tracey 1 0 0 0
> wake 1 0 0 0
> widdershins 1 11 0 4
> yu 1 0 0 0
> -------------- ------- ----- ----- ------ ------
> 132 37 10653 11687 9100 10033
Shut up, Dickless.
the "irrelevaant" Ignoranus, whined and
tholed like the antagonistic arsehole that he is:
> Michael Baldwin Bruce writes:
Having attribution problems again, Dickless?
> 8106> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings,rec.music.classical ,demon.local,ne.weather,rec.aviation.products
Thanks for making that easy for me, Dickless.
> 8106> And you wonder why I went in Haydn.
What? No witty reparte, Dickless?
> 8107> Completely anal retentive kookdancing queen, Dickless Davie
> 8107> the "irrelevaant" Ignoranus, whined and
> 8107> tholed like the antagonistic arsehole that he is:
>
> Who is "Dickless Davie ", Bruce? Still suffering
> from attribution problems, Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you still suffering from chronic
stupidity?
> 8107> You forgot the comma again, Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems,
> Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you still suffering from chronic
stupidity?
> 8107> What is it with you and commas?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, Bruce?
Note: no response.
> 8107> What does fruit have to do with classical music,
>
> Non sequitur.
Classic evasion.
> 8107> Dickless?
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems,
> Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you still suffering from chronic
stupidity?
> 8107> Who is "Bruce",
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, Bruce?
Note: no response.
> 8107> Dickless?
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems,
> Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you still suffering from chronic
stupidity?
> 8107> Still suffering from atrribution problems,
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
On your part, Dickless.
> 8107> Dickless?
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems,
> Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you still suffering from chronic
stupidity?
> 8107> Who is "Bruce",
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, Bruce?
Classic evasion.
> 8107> Dickless?
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems,
> Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you still suffering from chronic
stupidity?
> 8107> There's nobody here by that name.
>
> What does that to do with classical music, Bruce?
Classic evasion.
> 8107> And you are a ding-aling.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part, Dickless.
> 8107> What does fruit have to do with classical music,
>
> Non sequitur.
Yes, you are non sequitur, Dickless.
> 8107> Dickless?
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems,
> Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you still suffering from chronic
stupidity?
> 8107> Who is "Bruce",
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you still suffering from chronic
stupidity?
> 8107> Dickless?
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems,
> Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you still suffering from chronic
stupidity?
> 8107> Still suffering from atrribution problems,
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
On your part, Dickless.
> 8107> Dickless?
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems,
> Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you still suffering from chronic
stupidity?
> 8107> Who is "Bruce",
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, Bruce?
Classic evasion.
> 8107> Dickless?
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems,
> Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you still suffering from chronic
stupidity?
> 8107> There's nobody here by that name.
>
> What does that to do with classical music, Bruce?
Non sequitur.
> 8107> Now, what is the relevance of fruit to classical music,
>
> Non sequitur.
On your part.
> 8107> Dickless?
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems,
> Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you still suffering from chronic
stupidity?
> 8107> What a pair of kooks.
>
> Art Deco and Michael Baldwin Bruce.
What does that have to do with classical music, Dickless?
> 8107> What does that have to do with classical music,
>
> The meeting was simultaneous with a Rostropovich concert. The
> two activities were competing for audience. That much was quite
> clear. Amazing that it had to be spelled out for you, Bruce. Again.
> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Bruce?
Non sequitur.
> 8107> Dickless?
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems,
> Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you still suffering from chronic
stupidity?
> 8107> Shut up,
>
> Practice what you preach, Bruce.
Yes, you should, Dickless. Now, who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you
still suffering from chronic stupidity?
> 8107> Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems,
> Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you still suffering from chronic
stupidity?
> 8107> Ding!
>
> I'm well aware that you're a ding-a-ling, Bruce. No need to tell me
> about it.
Non sequitur and rather ironic.
> 8107> Shut up,
>
> Practice what you preach, Bruce.
Yes, you should, Dickless.
> 8107> Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems,
> Bruce?
Who is "Bruce", Dickless? Are you still suffering from chronic
stupidity?
> 8108> Goat ****er!
>
> 8109> So how does Foamy fish for ice anyway?
>
> 8110> The kid seems to be enjoying it. I wonder why?
>
> What does your ongoing "kookdance" have to do with classical music, Bruce?
> As usual, I won't get any explanation for the alleged relevance to classical
> music from Bruce.
What does your inclusion of posts not posted to rec.music.classical
have to do with classical music, Dickless?
> "Kooks don't think rationally, Bruce."
> --Michael Baldwin Bruce
Indeed.
> Phil Kyle writes:
>
> 710> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.fan.a rt-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.astronomy,demon.local,al t.fan.steveleyland,alt.astronomy
>
> 710> ALL HAEL TEH MIGHT POAST COUNT!!!!
>
> 711> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.fan.a rt-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.astronomy,demon.local,al t.fan.steveleyland,alt.astronomy
>
> 711> ALL HAEL TEH MIGHT POAST COUNT!!!!
>
> 712> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advo cacy
>
> 712> Shuttup, Protobrain.
>
> 713> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advo cacy
>
> 713> Shuttup, Protobrain.
>
> 714> Newsgroups: alt.satellite.tv.europe,alt.usage.english,demon.lo cal,uk.media.radio.bbc-r4,aus.invest,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.research,comp.os.o s2.advocacy
>
> 714> Quiet ko0k.
>
> 715> Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan. rush-limbaugh,alt.bad.clams,demon.local,alt.usenet.kook s,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
> 715> Quiet ko0k.
>
> 716> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local
>
> 716> But...the...light...is....so....inviting
>
> 717> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advo cacy
>
> 717> And no stupid top-posting either.
>
> 718> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advo cacy
>
> 718> And no stupid top-posting either.
>
> 719> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advo cacy
>
> 719> And no stupid top-posting either.
>
> 720> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local
>
> 720> Yup.
>
> 721> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local
>
> 721> Yup.
>
> 722> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local
>
> 722> They're a bunch of knocked off Germans.
>
> What does that have to do with OS/2, Kyle?
Shut up, Dickless.
> "Nightingale" > writes:
>
> 86> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,rec.music.classical
>
> 86> What are you, an accountant or something?
>
> 86> You're erroneously presupposing the existance of any logic at all.
>
> 87> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical
>
> 87> Where is the irony?
>
> In that "Lora" is an "antagonistic maroon", Nightingale.
>
> 87> Seriously, Tholen, it was a joke.
>
> Classic rationalization of Lora's hypocrisy.
>
> 87> I can't predict everything about you,
>
> Irrelevant, given that I didn't ask you to, Nightingale.
>
> 87> but you are quite consistent in some ways, like digesting
> 87> off-topic posts even from people who tried to be friends,
>
> Do you play favorites, Nightingale? For example, do you tell
> non-friends that they shouldn't drink and drive, but keep quiet
> when your friends do it?
>
> 87> and taking bait from trolls like Porter.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
> 87> Another joke - perhaps not a very good one, but perfectly sequitur to
> 87> MBB's groaner.
>
> Classic rationalization of Lora's hypocrisy.
>
> 87> What makes you think I was talking about him?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, Nightingale?
>
> 87> It was a reply to him talking about somebody else - guess who ;-)
>
> What does your request have to do with classical music, Nightingale?
>
> 87> You posted things here that we would not have otherwise seen - that's
> 87> wider distribution.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 87> Sarchasm noted.
>
> What is "Sarchasm", Nightingale?
>
> 87> True, but what purpose is served by reading and replying to his bait?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, Nightingale?
>
> 87> Unless you are an Ives fanatic, he has very little to say that is
> 87> worth reading.
>
> Hence he's desperate for attention. That's one way to explain his
> obsession.
>
> 87> And you, a kook in denial.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 87> It's actually your words that I was quoting.
>
> The quotation was from Lora, Nightingale, not you. Still suffering from
> reading comprehension problems, Nightingale?
>
> 87> What did you mean by writing that?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, Nightingale?
>
> 87> And we would not have seen most of them without your reposting.
>
> Who are you speaking for when you say "we", Nightingale?
>
> 87> Thanks.
>
> What does your thanks have to do with classical music, Nightingale?
>
> 87> You didn't admit it
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
> 87> - my point is proven.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
> 87> I show up every once in a while when I'm not busy with more
> 87> interesting things - you've been doing it for many years.
>
> Non sequitur, given that the discussion was about "Lora", not about
> "Nightingale", Nightingale.
>
> 87> Who's obsessed?
>
> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Nightingale?
> Clearly Porter is obsessed. But what does your question have to do
> with classical music, Nightingale?
>
> 87> You could just plonk him.
>
> Illogical, given that plonking won't prevent him from starting new
> threads with content irrelevant to the newsgroup, Nightingale.
And how does that affect your ability to plonk him, Dickless?
Now, what does your inability to plonk someone have to do with
classical music, Dickless?
> alias # today total year 3 year 2 year 1
> -------------- ------- ----- ----- ------ ------
> deco 17 4115 3722 2268 0
> bruce 5 3163 2867 1979 0
Ole!
> ah 624 320 112 0
> honestjohn 445 90 0 0
> kyle 13 357 313 0 0
> hucker 282 44 4 2
> clarinet.fan 204 0 0 0
> double-a 147 145 1 0
> haslam 139 534 198 677
> tallis 111 0 0 0
> snarky 103 0 0 0
> lora 80 0 0 0
> demon 60 11 0 0
> hunt 47 0 0 0
> text 45 0 0 0
> crightingale 38 0 0 0
> mars 38 0 0 0
> loonie 35 178 62 0
> "nightingale" 2 33 0 59 0
> bookman 26 44 15 4
> freespeechstore 26 2 0 0
> bisectional 24 154 377 0
> odd 23 0 0 0
> puddleduck 23 0 0 0
> hagar 22 1 0 0
> kadaitcha 20 40 13 0
> nightbat 19 37 3 0
> tom 18 0 0 0
> wehrung 18 27 75 262
> crane 16 0 0 0
> hillstrom 16 31 0 0
> nemo 16 0 0 0
> warhol 16 0 0 0
> h0plibbb_oili 14 26 0 0
> crighton 13 0 0 0
> elizabot 11 6 51 0
> kirk 11 0 0 0
> nightingale^2 10 10 0 0
> krp 9 2 0 0
> porter 9 37 0 163
> pluto 8 0 0 0
> porsche 8 0 0 0
> buzzard 7 0 0 0
> me 7 0 0 0
> schmidt 7 0 0 0
> android 6 0 0 0
> aratzio 6 54 133 0
> holly 6 0 0 0
> neill 6 0 0 0
> newsgroup 6 0 0 0
> raoul 6 0 0 0
> rien 6 0 0 0
> homintern 5 0 0 0
> hubert 5 0 0 0
> monaghan 5 15 4 0
> paul 5 0 0 0
> professeur 5 0 0 0
> sleepyhead 5 0 0 0
> bruening 4 0 0 0
> ross 4 62 319 10
> b s 3 0 0 0
> cujo 3 9 2 0
> davie 3 14 105 0
> dog3 3 0 0 0
> goat 3 0 0 0
> guth 3 0 0 0
> igor 3 0 0 0
> malloy 3 47 30 1
> prufrock 3 0 0 0
> singer 3 17 0 0
> bartlo 2 0 1 303
> byrd 2 0 0 10
> craig 2 0 0 0
> dakkash 2 0 0 0
> daniels 2 5 67 165
> fEkLaaar 2 0 0 0
> gym 2 0 0 0
> holmes 2 0 0 0
> kolle 2 3 20 264
> mdhjwh 2 0 0 0
> pervert 2 0 0 0
> pounder 2 0 0 0
> prai jei 2 3 9 11
> sameasb4 2 0 0 0
> snuhwolf5150 2 0 0 0
> stone 2 25 8 0
> teddysnips 2 0 0 0
> twittering 2 36 10 0
> .@. 1 0 0 0
> baba 1 0 0 0
> balmer 1 6 0 0
> blade 1 0 0 0
> bloamy 1 0 0 0
> blu 1 0 0 0
> dizzy 1 132 135 522
> eBayer 1 0 0 0
> fjiluk 1 0 0 0
> gamble 1 5 1 13
> granzeau 1 0 0 0
> hammes 1 0 0 0
> harding 1 0 0 0
> harrington 1 0 0 0
> harry 1 0 0 0
> ilechko 1 0 0 0
> imposter 1 18 12 0
> jay 1 0 0 0
> jones 1 0 0 0
> lamey 1 0 0 0
> leach 1 39 0 0
> leyland 1 0 0 0
> lincoln 1 0 0 0
> lookingglass 1 0 0 0
> lord 1 0 0 0
> marko 1 0 0 0
> meow 1 1 4 0
> metro 1 0 0 0
> nightmist 1 0 0 0
> plow 1 4 0 0
> podguszer 1 0 0 1
> requiem 1 0 0 0
> robb 1 0 0 0
> rock 1 0 0 0
> roofshadow 1 0 0 0
> ryan 1 0 0 0
> sanchez 1 0 0 0
> santos 1 0 0 0
> silverfin 1 0 0 0
> steveo 1 0 0 0
> tracey 1 0 0 0
> wake 1 0 0 0
> widdershins 1 11 0 4
> yu 1 0 0 0
> -------------- ------- ----- ----- ------ ------
> 132 37 10653 11687 9100 10033
Shut up, Dickless.