I can see it

[Hunter]

I can see it in the near future, the new CVN-82 USS Hillary R.Clinton saling
side by side with her sister ship CVN-79 USS William J.Clinton

[Paul Elliot]

Hunter wrote:
> I can see it in the near future, the new CVN-82 USS Hillary R.Clinton saling
> side by side with her sister ship CVN-79 USS William J.Clinton
>
>

EEWWWwwww!
:-)

--
Heaven is where the police are British, the chefs Italian, the mechanics
German, the lovers French and it is all organized by the Swiss.

Hell is where the police are German, the chefs British, the mechanics
French, the lovers Swiss and it is all organized by Italians.

http://new.photos.yahoo.com/paul1cart/albums/

[Bill Kambic]

On Tue, 8 May 2007 12:42:02 +0200, "Hunter" > wrote:

>I can see it in the near future, the new CVN-82 USS Hillary R.Clinton saling
>side by side with her sister ship CVN-79 USS William J.Clinton

I can seem them exchanging air strikes.

Is there a USS MONICA LEWINSKY in the future of the "service" fleet?
:-)

[Paul Elliot]

Bill Kambic wrote:
> On Tue, 8 May 2007 12:42:02 +0200, "Hunter" > wrote:
>
>> I can see it in the near future, the new CVN-82 USS Hillary R.Clinton saling
>> side by side with her sister ship CVN-79 USS William J.Clinton
>
> I can seem them exchanging air strikes.
>
> Is there a USS MONICA LEWINSKY in the future of the "service" fleet?
> :-)

Uh, that would be an SSN, I think. Always going down.

--
Heaven is where the police are British, the chefs Italian, the mechanics
German, the lovers French and it is all organized by the Swiss.

Hell is where the police are German, the chefs British, the mechanics
French, the lovers Swiss and it is all organized by Italians.

http://new.photos.yahoo.com/paul1cart/albums/

[Airyx]

On May 8, 10:20 am, Paul Elliot > wrote:
> Bill Kambic wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 May 2007 12:42:02 +0200, "Hunter" > wrote:
>
> >> I can see it in the near future, the new CVN-82 USS Hillary R.Clinton saling
> >> side by side with her sister ship CVN-79 USS William J.Clinton
>
> > I can seem them exchanging air strikes.
>
> > Is there a USS MONICA LEWINSKY in the future of the "service" fleet?
> > :-)
>
> Uh, that would be an SSN, I think. Always going down.

Cigar shaped as well.

[®i©ardo]

Airyx wrote:
> On May 8, 10:20 am, Paul Elliot > wrote:
>> Bill Kambic wrote:
>>> On Tue, 8 May 2007 12:42:02 +0200, "Hunter" > wrote:
>>>> I can see it in the near future, the new CVN-82 USS Hillary R.Clinton saling
>>>> side by side with her sister ship CVN-79 USS William J.Clinton
>>> I can seem them exchanging air strikes.
>>> Is there a USS MONICA LEWINSKY in the future of the "service" fleet?
>>> :-)
>> Uh, that would be an SSN, I think. Always going down.
>
> Cigar shaped as well.
>
Would they be into watersports as well?

....and still on nautical note, with sexual overtones, we have:

A family of whales was swimming around on a nice day. Suddenly a boat
with harpooners came and killed the baby whale. A few years went by and
the same boat came around again. When the father whale saw it, he said
that they should pay those *******s back for killing their son. He
turned to the wife and said "lets go under the boat and blow as hard as
we can then tip the boat over." The wife agreed, so they went under the
boat and blew as hard as they could and tipped the boat over. They went
back to the top and saw all of the men swimming to rafts and grabbing
life jackets. The dad whale says "We didn't do enough to them to pay
them back, lets go eat some of them now." The wife said "now hold on a
minute I agreed to the blow job but I'm not going to swallow any sea men."

--
Moving things in still pictures!

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

"Hunter" > wrote in message
...
>I can see it in the near future, the new CVN-82 USS Hillary R.Clinton
>saling side by side with her sister ship CVN-79 USS William J.Clinton

There may be a fallicy in this.
One must consider the fact that the very existance of these two people in
the political/military equation of the United States may well have denied
the building of these two ships and therefore the ships might not exist at
all.
Just a thought :-))
DH

[Mike Kanze]

Classifications are wrong:

William J. Clinton (YSR-69)
Hillary R. Clinton (IX-580)

http://www.nvr.navy.mil/class.htm

--
Mike Kanze

"I always get a laugh out of those women's lower back tattoos having Han (Chinese) characters. At least half of them would probably translate to 'Kung Pao Chicken With Singapore Rice Noodles' or similar."


"Hunter" > wrote in message ...
I can see it in the near future, the new CVN-82 USS Hillary R.Clinton saling
side by side with her sister ship CVN-79 USS William J.Clinton

[Tex Houston]

"Mike Kanze" > wrote in message
. ..

"I always get a laugh out of those women's lower back tattoos having Han
(Chinese) characters. At least half of them would probably translate to
'Kung Pao Chicken With Singapore Rice Noodles' or similar."

How about "A cheap dish but very tasty." ?

Tex

[Peter Skelton]

On Tue, 8 May 2007 12:44:45 -0600, "Tex Houston"
> wrote:

>
>"Mike Kanze" > wrote in message
. ..
>
>"I always get a laugh out of those women's lower back tattoos having Han
>(Chinese) characters. At least half of them would probably translate to
>'Kung Pao Chicken With Singapore Rice Noodles' or similar."
>
>How about "A cheap dish but very tasty." ?
>
Translated from Japanese on the beach at Sandbanks

"restricted entry staff only"


Peter Skelton

[Bill Kambic]

On Tue, 8 May 2007 12:44:45 -0600, "Tex Houston"
> wrote:

>
>"Mike Kanze" > wrote in message
. ..
>
>"I always get a laugh out of those women's lower back tattoos having Han
>(Chinese) characters. At least half of them would probably translate to
>'Kung Pao Chicken With Singapore Rice Noodles' or similar."
>
>How about "A cheap dish but very tasty." ?

Or, "If you are what you eat I'm cheap, fast, and easy!"

[Airyx]

On May 8, 12:07 pm, "Mike Kanze" > wrote:
> Classifications are wrong:
>
> William J. Clinton (YSR-69)
> Hillary R. Clinton (IX-580)

Bwaaa, Sludge Removal Barge...very good.

[KENG]

Paul Elliot wrote:
> Bill Kambic wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 8 May 2007 12:42:02 +0200, "Hunter" > wrote:
>>
>>> I can see it in the near future, the new CVN-82 USS Hillary R.Clinton
>>> saling side by side with her sister ship CVN-79 USS William J.Clinton
>>
>>
>> I can seem them exchanging air strikes.
>>
>> Is there a USS MONICA LEWINSKY in the future of the "service" fleet?
>> :-)
>
>
> Uh, that would be an SSN, I think. Always going down.
>
And full of seamen

[Mike Kanze]

>Or, "If you are what you eat I'm cheap, fast, and easy!"

Reminds me of:

"If you are what you eat, and you don't know what you're eating - do you know who you are?"


Good follow-ons, you guys.

--
Mike Kanze

"I always get a laugh out of those women's lower back tattoos having Han (Chinese) characters. At least half of them would probably translate to 'Kung Pao Chicken With Singapore Rice Noodles' or similar."


"Bill Kambic" > wrote in message ...
On Tue, 8 May 2007 12:44:45 -0600, "Tex Houston"
> wrote:

>
>"Mike Kanze" > wrote in message
. ..
>
>"I always get a laugh out of those women's lower back tattoos having Han
>(Chinese) characters. At least half of them would probably translate to
>'Kung Pao Chicken With Singapore Rice Noodles' or similar."
>
>How about "A cheap dish but very tasty." ?

Or, "If you are what you eat I'm cheap, fast, and easy!"

[Peter Stickney]

Bill Kambic wrote:

> On Tue, 8 May 2007 12:42:02 +0200, "Hunter" > wrote:
>
>>I can see it in the near future, the new CVN-82 USS Hillary R.Clinton
>>saling side by side with her sister ship CVN-79 USS William J.Clinton
>
> I can seem them exchanging air strikes.
>
> Is there a USS MONICA LEWINSKY in the future of the "service" fleet?

Suction Dredge, IIRC.

--
Pete Stickney
Without data, all you have is an opinion

[Leanne]

"Peter Stickney" > wrote in message
...
> Bill Kambic wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 8 May 2007 12:42:02 +0200, "Hunter" > wrote:
>>
>>>I can see it in the near future, the new CVN-82 USS Hillary R.Clinton
>>>saling side by side with her sister ship CVN-79 USS William J.Clinton
>>
>> I can seem them exchanging air strikes.
>>
>> Is there a USS MONICA LEWINSKY in the future of the "service" fleet?
>
> Suction Dredge, IIRC.

There used to be a suction vessel, for oil spills, at Pearl Harbor, called
the Juicy Scoopy.

Leanne

[[email protected]]

On May 8, 5:42 am, "Hunter" > wrote:
> I can see it in the near future, the new CVN-82 USS Hillary R.Clinton saling
> side by side with her sister ship CVN-79 USS William J.Clinton

There's actually a USS Hillary R. Clinton in the "Axis of Time" series
of historical fiction novels. Named after the assasinated 44th
president of the United States, "The most uncompromising wartime
president the country ever had", the Big Hill is thrown back in time
and emerges near Midway Island just before the decisive battle between
the U.S. and Japan. General time-travel chaos ensues.

[Mike Kanze]

>the Big Hill is thrown back in time and emerges near Midway Island just before the decisive battle between the U.S. and Japan.

>The most uncompromising wartime president the country ever had

Sounds like a not-very-original plotline rip-off of the movie The Final Countdown (1980), not to mention a characterization paralleling Margaret Thatcher's during the Falklands campaign.

--
Mike Kanze

"I always get a laugh out of those women's lower back tattoos having Han (Chinese) characters. At least half of them would probably translate to 'Kung Pao Chicken With Singapore Rice Noodles' or similar."


> wrote in message ps.com...
On May 8, 5:42 am, "Hunter" > wrote:
> I can see it in the near future, the new CVN-82 USS Hillary R.Clinton saling
> side by side with her sister ship CVN-79 USS William J.Clinton

There's actually a USS Hillary R. Clinton in the "Axis of Time" series
of historical fiction novels. Named after the assasinated 44th
president of the United States, "The most uncompromising wartime
president the country ever had", the Big Hill is thrown back in time
and emerges near Midway Island just before the decisive battle between
the U.S. and Japan. General time-travel chaos ensues.

[[email protected]]

Yes, well, if this movie season is any proof, originality doesn't
sell. (Sequels and remakes do, however).

On May 11, 12:03 pm, "Mike Kanze" > wrote:
> >the Big Hill is thrown back in time and emerges near Midway Island just before the decisive battle between the U.S. and Japan.
> >The most uncompromising wartime president the country ever had
>
> Sounds like a not-very-original plotline rip-off of the movie The Final Countdown (1980), not to mention a characterization paralleling Margaret Thatcher's during the Falklands campaign.
>
> --
> Mike Kanze
>
> "I always get a laugh out of those women's lower back tattoos having Han (Chinese) characters. At least half of them would probably translate to 'Kung Pao Chicken With Singapore Rice Noodles' or similar."
>
> > wrote in glegroups.com...
>
> On May 8, 5:42 am, "Hunter" > wrote:
> > I can see it in the near future, the new CVN-82 USS Hillary R.Clinton saling
> > side by side with her sister ship CVN-79 USS William J.Clinton
>
> There's actually a USS Hillary R. Clinton in the "Axis of Time" series
> of historical fiction novels. Named after the assasinated 44th
> president of the United States, "The most uncompromising wartime
> president the country ever had", the Big Hill is thrown back in time
> and emerges near Midway Island just before the decisive battle between
> the U.S. and Japan. General time-travel chaos ensues.

[vincent norris]

>> "I always get a laugh out of those women's lower back tattoos having Han
>> (Chinese) characters. At least half of them would probably translate to
>> 'Kung Pao Chicken With Singapore Rice Noodles' or similar."
>>
>> How about "A cheap dish but very tasty." ?
>
> Or, "If you are what you eat I'm cheap, fast, and easy!"
>

You young whippersnappers probably don't remember this, but in one issue
in 1946, Life Magazine, which then ran a "picture of the week,"
published a rear-view picture of a woman wearing a stunningly beautiful
robe, made of flaming red satin, with a huge dragon embroidered all
over the back. It went all the way up one side and across the shoulders
and down the other side. And of course there were a lot of Chinese
characters.

In 1946 there were U.S.Marines in China. The picture's caption said that
the woman's husband, a Marine captain, had sent it to her.

A week or two later, the "Letters to the Editor" column contained a
brief letter from a Professor of Chinese at some university. It said,
"You may be interested to know that the inscription on that robe says,
"I am Nanking's finest prostitute."

vince norris

[Mike Kanze]

Vince,

Before my time on this mortal coil, but it underscores my point. I'll bet there are any number of these "artworks" whose owners would be horrified to learn what's actually being said.

At least "Property of Hells Angels MC" one can understand.

--
Mike Kanze

"I always get a laugh out of those women's lower back tattoos having Han (Chinese) characters. At least half of them would probably translate to 'Kung Pao Chicken With Singapore Rice Noodles' or similar."

"vincent norris" > wrote in message ...
>> "I always get a laugh out of those women's lower back tattoos having Han
>> (Chinese) characters. At least half of them would probably translate to
>> 'Kung Pao Chicken With Singapore Rice Noodles' or similar."
>>
>> How about "A cheap dish but very tasty." ?
>
> Or, "If you are what you eat I'm cheap, fast, and easy!"
>

You young whippersnappers probably don't remember this, but in one issue
in 1946, Life Magazine, which then ran a "picture of the week,"
published a rear-view picture of a woman wearing a stunningly beautiful
robe, made of flaming red satin, with a huge dragon embroidered all
over the back. It went all the way up one side and across the shoulders
and down the other side. And of course there were a lot of Chinese
characters.

In 1946 there were U.S.Marines in China. The picture's caption said that
the woman's husband, a Marine captain, had sent it to her.

A week or two later, the "Letters to the Editor" column contained a
brief letter from a Professor of Chinese at some university. It said,
"You may be interested to know that the inscription on that robe says,
"I am Nanking's finest prostitute."

vince norris

[Charlie Wolf]

If that's not existential, I don't know what is....
Regards,

On Tue, 8 May 2007 12:50:08 -0400, "Dudley Henriques"
> wrote:

>
>"Hunter" > wrote in message
...
>>I can see it in the near future, the new CVN-82 USS Hillary R.Clinton
>>saling side by side with her sister ship CVN-79 USS William J.Clinton
>
>There may be a fallicy in this.
>One must consider the fact that the very existance of these two people in
>the political/military equation of the United States may well have denied
>the building of these two ships and therefore the ships might not exist at
>all.
>Just a thought :-))
>DH
>

[Mike Kanze]

Dudley & Charlie,

Never underestimate the desire of a politician to have some edifice with his / her name on it, or the desire of his or her acolytes to make it happen. Particularly something BIG like a CV.

--
Mike Kanze

"Son, this is a Washington, D.C. kind of lie. It's when the other person knows you're lying and also knows you know he knows."

- Robert Leffingwell (Henry Fonda), Advise And Consent, 1962

"Charlie Wolf" > wrote in message ...
If that's not existential, I don't know what is....
Regards,

On Tue, 8 May 2007 12:50:08 -0400, "Dudley Henriques"
> wrote:

>
>"Hunter" > wrote in message
...
>>I can see it in the near future, the new CVN-82 USS Hillary R.Clinton
>>saling side by side with her sister ship CVN-79 USS William J.Clinton
>
>There may be a fallicy in this.
>One must consider the fact that the very existance of these two people in
>the political/military equation of the United States may well have denied
>the building of these two ships and therefore the ships might not exist at
>all.
>Just a thought :-))
>DH
>

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

And now.....on to the REAL question of the day. Did Erwin Schrodinger like
cats or not. Personally I have no superposition on this issue. :-))
Dudley Henriques



"Charlie Wolf" > wrote in message
...
> If that's not existential, I don't know what is....
> Regards,
>
> On Tue, 8 May 2007 12:50:08 -0400, "Dudley Henriques"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>"Hunter" > wrote in message
...
>>>I can see it in the near future, the new CVN-82 USS Hillary R.Clinton
>>>saling side by side with her sister ship CVN-79 USS William J.Clinton
>>
>>There may be a fallicy in this.
>>One must consider the fact that the very existance of these two people in
>>the political/military equation of the United States may well have denied
>>the building of these two ships and therefore the ships might not exist at
>>all.
>>Just a thought :-))
>>DH
>>
>

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

You might REALLY have a handle on this one Mike :-)))
Dudley Henriques
"Mike Kanze" > wrote in message
. ..
Dudley & Charlie,

Never underestimate the desire of a politician to have some edifice with his
/ her name on it, or the desire of his or her acolytes to make it happen.
Particularly something BIG like a CV.

--
Mike Kanze

"Son, this is a Washington, D.C. kind of lie. It's when the other person
knows you're lying and also knows you know he knows."

- Robert Leffingwell (Henry Fonda), Advise And Consent, 1962

"Charlie Wolf" > wrote in message
...
If that's not existential, I don't know what is....
Regards,

On Tue, 8 May 2007 12:50:08 -0400, "Dudley Henriques"
> wrote:

>
>"Hunter" > wrote in message
...
>>I can see it in the near future, the new CVN-82 USS Hillary R.Clinton
>>saling side by side with her sister ship CVN-79 USS William J.Clinton
>
>There may be a fallicy in this.
>One must consider the fact that the very existance of these two people in
>the political/military equation of the United States may well have denied
>the building of these two ships and therefore the ships might not exist at
>all.
>Just a thought :-))
>DH
>

[Joe]

"Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Hunter" > wrote in message
> ...
> >I can see it in the near future, the new CVN-82 USS Hillary R.Clinton
> >saling side by side with her sister ship CVN-79 USS William J.Clinton
>
> There may be a fallicy in this.
> One must consider the fact that the very existance of these two people in
> the political/military equation of the United States may well have denied
> the building of these two ships and therefore the ships might not exist at
> all.
> Just a thought :-))
> DH


you mean like the submarine Jimmy Carter ?