PDA

View Full Version : Ohio midair crash kills 3


Larry Dighera
May 12th 07, 06:04 PM
There's still no information on the FAA web site:
http://www.faa.gov/data_statistics/accident_incident/preliminary_data/

Does anyone have any more information about this MAC:


http://robots.cnn.com/2007/US/05/11/aircraft.crash.ap/index.html
SHARONVILLE, Ohio (AP) -- Two small planes collided Friday
afternoon over suburban Cincinnati, Ohio, raining debris onto
roads and back yards and killing three people on board but missing
those on the ground as rush hour approached, federal investigators
said.

The two aircraft narrowly missed falling on a busy freeway.

"I'm just thankful it wasn't worse than it was, with school buses
and people coming home from work and the interstate that we have
nearby," said Michael Schappa, Sharonville's police chief.

The Federal Aviation Administration had no information about the
planes' flight plans or why they were so close together. Blue Ash
Airport, a runway used by small planes, is several miles away.
State Highway Patrol Lt. Wayne Price said investigators assume
both planes took off from there.

The planes' pilots were not required to file flight plans and
apparently were not in contact with air traffic controllers, the
FAA said. Under federal regulations, the pilots were responsible
for maintaining a safe distance on a clear, sunny afternoon.

GrtArtiste
May 12th 07, 06:11 PM
On May 12, 1:04 pm, Larry Dighera > wrote:
> There's still no information on the FAA web site:http://www.faa.gov/data_statistics/accident_incident/preliminary_data/
>
> Does anyone have any more information about this MAC:

http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070512/NEWS01/705120381

GrtArtiste

Bob Gardner
May 12th 07, 07:40 PM
I use www.newslink.org to check in for the local take on such
accidents/incidents.

Bob Gardner
"Larry Dighera" > wrote in message
...
>
> There's still no information on the FAA web site:
> http://www.faa.gov/data_statistics/accident_incident/preliminary_data/
>
> Does anyone have any more information about this MAC:
>
>
> http://robots.cnn.com/2007/US/05/11/aircraft.crash.ap/index.html
> SHARONVILLE, Ohio (AP) -- Two small planes collided Friday
> afternoon over suburban Cincinnati, Ohio, raining debris onto
> roads and back yards and killing three people on board but missing
> those on the ground as rush hour approached, federal investigators
> said.
>
> The two aircraft narrowly missed falling on a busy freeway.
>
> "I'm just thankful it wasn't worse than it was, with school buses
> and people coming home from work and the interstate that we have
> nearby," said Michael Schappa, Sharonville's police chief.
>
> The Federal Aviation Administration had no information about the
> planes' flight plans or why they were so close together. Blue Ash
> Airport, a runway used by small planes, is several miles away.
> State Highway Patrol Lt. Wayne Price said investigators assume
> both planes took off from there.
>
> The planes' pilots were not required to file flight plans and
> apparently were not in contact with air traffic controllers, the
> FAA said. Under federal regulations, the pilots were responsible
> for maintaining a safe distance on a clear, sunny afternoon.
>
>

Larry Dighera
May 13th 07, 12:57 AM
On Sat, 12 May 2007 11:40:23 -0700, "Bob Gardner" >
wrote in >:

>I use www.newslink.org to check in for the local take on such
>accidents/incidents.


Many thanks.

That NewsLink.org turned up this update:


http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070512/NEWS01/305120021
Last Updated: 7:21 pm | Saturday, May 12, 2007

NTSB: Planes clipped wings
BY JON NEWBERRY AND PEGGY O’FARRELL | ,

SHARONVILLE – A witness told federal investigators that she saw
two small aircraft clip wings before spiraling to the ground in a
collision that left three Greater Cincinnati men dead, an
investigator with the National Transportation Safety Board said
today.

Ed Malinowski told reporters that the planes were traveling in
opposite directions when they hit.

Killed were Niels Harpsoe, 64, of West Chester, pilot of a
Beechcraft Bonanza V35B that crashed on East Kemper Road west of
Reed Hartman Highway; as well as Edward L. Hitchens, 65, of Symmes
Township, and David Woeste Jr., 31, of Anderson Township, who were
in a Cessna Skyhawk that crashed at 5862 Squire Hill Court.

The Hamilton County Coroner’s office is conduct autopsies today on
the three victims.


• David Woeste was father of four

• Edward Hitchens was "mayor of the block"

• Friends remember Niels Harpsoe

Malinowski confirmed that the Cessna was carrying a flight
instructor and student and that the plane featured dual controls.

Hitchens was described as a veteran flight instructor. It is not
known which man was in control of the Cessna.

Federal investigators and the Ohio State Highway Patrol are
gathering clues on the crash.

Malinowski said it will be a few days before investigators can
look at radar reports from a nearby airport, if any such reports
are available.

Investigators want to know the direction and speed at which the
two planes were flying, he said.

Right now, Malinowski said, investigators are focusing on
gathering perishable evidence from the two crash sites.

...

john smith
May 13th 07, 06:11 AM
I don't have direct information, but I do fly in and out of KISZ on a
regular basis.
- Without knowing what the winds were at the time...
the location is where one aircraft would be on right base for R24 and
where a departing aircraft would be on left upwind crosswind if
departing R06.
- some local speculation in a high-wing/low-wing situation where visual
separation lost or was not attained.
- no one has commented on hearing any communication from either aircraft
as yet.
Personal note:
- the name and address of one of the C172 occupants is consistent with a
former high school teacher I had 35 years ago.

Larry Dighera wrote:
> There's still no information on the FAA web site:
> http://www.faa.gov/data_statistics/accident_incident/preliminary_data/
> Does anyone have any more information about this MAC:

Mark T. Dame
May 14th 07, 05:12 PM
Larry Dighera wrote:
>
> The Federal Aviation Administration had no information about the
> planes' flight plans or why they were so close together. Blue Ash
> Airport, a runway used by small planes, is several miles away.

That's a bit of an overstatement. The plane that crashed closest to the
airport landed less than three miles away from the approach end of
runway 24. The other plane came down about a mile north of that. They
were outside the traffic pattern, but well within the airport area.


> State Highway Patrol Lt. Wayne Price said investigators assume
> both planes took off from there.

I've heard (but have no direct knowledge or proof) that the 172 was an
instructor and instrument student doing instrument approaches and the
Bonanza had just departed. Regardless, it seems that the Bonanza was
either on a departure or an approach and the 172 was conducting training
operations involving landings.

Weather was clear, visibility probably around 10 miles. At this point
we mostly only have speculation.


-m
--
## Mark T. Dame >
## CP-ASEL, AGI
## <insert tail number here>
## KHAO, KISZ
"To become a Jedi knight, you must master a single force. To become a
private pilot you must strive to master four of them"
-- Rod Machado

Larry Dighera
May 15th 07, 09:58 PM
On Sun, 13 May 2007 01:11:11 -0400, john smith > wrote
in >:

>I don't have direct information, but I do fly in and out of KISZ on a
>regular basis.
>- Without knowing what the winds were at the time...

This weather data is from KLUK (about 20 miles northeast) on May 11,
2007:


http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/mesowest/getobext.php?wfo=lox&sid=KLUK&num=168&raw=0&dbn=m
Time Temp. Dew Relative Wind Wind Visibility WX Clouds Sea Level
Altimeter Station Precip 6 Hr 6 Hr 24 Hr 24 Hr Quality
Point Humidity Direction Speed Pressure Setting Pressure 1
hour Max Min Max Min Control
(EDT) (f) (f) (%) (mph) (miles) (mb) (inches) (inches) (inches)
Temp Temp Temp Temp

11 May 11:53 pm 71 57 61 ENE 3 10.00 CLR 1014.1 29.96 29.451 OK
11 May 10:53 pm 69 58 68 CALM 10.00 SCT090 1014.2 29.96 29.451
OK
11 May 9:53 pm 71 58 63 CALM 10.00 CLR 1013.8 29.95 29.441 OK
11 May 8:53 pm 74 60 62 CALM 10.00 CLR 1013.4 29.94 29.431 OK
11 May 7:53 pm 81 54 39 CALM 10.00 CLR 1012.8 29.92 29.411 87
81 OK
11 May 6:53 pm 82 52 35 N 8 10.00 CLR 1012.5 29.91 29.401 OK
11 May 5:53 pm 85 46 26 NNW 9 10.00 CLR 1012.5 29.91 29.401 OK
11 May 4:53 pm 87 49 27 NNE 8 10.00 CLR 1012.6 29.91 29.401 OK
11 May 3:53 pm 86 50 29 VRBL 6 10.00 CLR 1013.1 29.93 29.421 OK
11 May 2:53 pm 86 52 31 WNW 10 10.00 CLR 1013.6 29.94 29.431 OK
11 May 1:53 pm 85 51 31 VRBL 6 10.00 CLR 1013.6 29.94 29.431 85
61 OK
11 May 12:53 pm 85 52 32 NNW 9 10.00 CLR 1013.9 29.95 29.441 OK
11 May 11:53 am 83 53 36 N 7 10.00 CLR 1014.3 29.96 29.451 OK
11 May 10:53 am 79 61 54 SSW 3 10.00 CLR 1014.3 29.96 29.451 OK
11 May 9:53 am 73 61 66 CALM 6.00 HZ CLR 1014.5 29.97 29.461 OK
11 May 8:53 am 67 60 79 CALM 7.00 BR CLR 1014.5 29.97 29.461 OK
11 May 6:53 am 57 56 96 CALM 5.00 BR CLR 1013.6 29.94 29.431 OK
11 May 6:35 am 57 55 94 CALM 2.00 BR CLR 29.94 29.431 OK
11 May 6:05 am 57 55 94 CALM 0.50 FG CLR 29.94 29.431 OK
11 May 5:53 am 58 56 93 CALM 1.75 BR CLR 1013.3 29.94 29.431 OK
11 May 5:40 am 57 55 94 CALM 1.75 BR CLR 29.93 29.421 OK
11 May 5:32 am 57 55 94 CALM 4.00 BR CLR 29.93 29.421 OK
11 May 5:16 am 57 57 100 CALM 1.00 BR CLR 29.93 29.421 OK
11 May 4:53 am 58 56 93 CALM 0.75 BR CLR 1013.2 29.93 29.421 0.01
OK
11 May 4:42 am 59 57 94 CALM 1.75 BR CLR 29.93 29.421 OK
11 May 4:34 am 59 55 88 CALM 3.00 BR CLR 29.93 29.421 OK
11 May 4:21 am 57 55 94 CALM 1.50 BR CLR 29.93 29.421 OK
11 May 3:53 am 59 57 94 CALM 6.00 BR CLR 1013.0 29.93 29.421 OK
11 May 2:53 am 59 55 88 CALM 7.00 CLR 1012.9 29.93 29.421 OK
11 May 1:53 am 61 57 87 CALM 10.00 CLR 1013.0 29.93 29.421 79
60 OK
11 May 12:53 am 61 56 83 CALM 10.00 CLR 1013.1 29.93 29.421 84
57 OK



>the location is where one aircraft would be on right base for R24 and
>where a departing aircraft would be on left upwind crosswind if
>departing R06.
>- some local speculation in a high-wing/low-wing situation where visual
>separation lost or was not attained.
>- no one has commented on hearing any communication from either aircraft
>as yet.
>Personal note:
>- the name and address of one of the C172 occupants is consistent with a
>former high school teacher I had 35 years ago.

Thanks for these details.

Andrew Sarangan
May 16th 07, 04:08 AM
On May 13, 1:11 am, john smith > wrote:
> I don't have direct information, but I do fly in and out of KISZ on a
> regular basis.
> - Without knowing what the winds were at the time...
> the location is where one aircraft would be on right base for R24 and
> where a departing aircraft would be on left upwind crosswind if
> departing R06.
> - some local speculation in a high-wing/low-wing situation where visual
> separation lost or was not attained.
> - no one has commented on hearing any communication from either aircraft
> as yet.
> Personal note:
> - the name and address of one of the C172 occupants is consistent with a
> former high school teacher I had 35 years ago.
>

I live not too far from the accident scene, and I have a scanner that
records all CTAF communications in the vicinity and uploads to my
website. I have not searched the audio archives carefully, but perhaps
one of you might want to take a look and find if anything relevant to
this crash shows up. Here is the link:

http://www.sarangan.org/aviation/scan_audio/

Larry Dighera
May 16th 07, 04:48 PM
On 15 May 2007 20:08:50 -0700, Andrew Sarangan >
wrote in . com>:

>I live not too far from the accident scene, and I have a scanner that
>records all CTAF communications in the vicinity and uploads to my
>website. I have not searched the audio archives carefully, but perhaps
>one of you might want to take a look and find if anything relevant to
>this crash shows up. Here is the link:
>
>http://www.sarangan.org/aviation/scan_audio/

Yours may be the sole record of these transmissions. Thank you for
making them available.


From the FAA preliminary information (below):

Date: 05/11/2007
Time: 1903 UTC
Time: 15:03 Local (UTC -4:00)
N6614D, A CESSNA 172
N1835L, A BEECH V35B

Cincinnati-Blue Ash Airport KISZ
Elevation: 856 ft.
Airport Information: http://www.airnav.com/airport/KISZ
Chart: http://skyvector.com/#21-106-3-2057-1518


Here's what I found on the tapes (probably the last words of the MAC
pilots):


Audio File: May 11, 2007; 14-15; METAR (KMGY)
35009KT 310V020 10SM CLR 28/10
Position
In File Aircraft Broadcast
------------------------------------------------------------
10:17 Bonanza N1835L 5 mi N, will be entering L DW Rny6 FS
10:25 Cessna N6614D Just departed rny6 ... departing rnwy
20 clmbg thru 2,100...Will be looking
for the Bonanza on...
10:49 Bonanza N1835L 4 mi ... 6,000' we'll be entering L DW
for ...6





Audio File: May 11, 2007; 15-16; METAR (KMGY)
02008KT 10SM CLR 28/12
Position
In File Aircraft Broadcast
------------------------------------------------------------
....
02:43 Helo 6CS is Sky5 about 3 to the S @
2,00 mid-field xing NB
02:51 Sky5
03:00 Sheriff 1,400 aprch frm W
....
03:50 Sky5 ...275 @ 2,000 in orbit
04:26 Sheriff? ... mi NE of Blue Ash
06:31 Sky5 Sky5 helo & Sheriff helo orbiting
about 2 mi NE @ 1,500 to 2,000
06:42 Sky5 You call'n Blue Ash or 229 Sheriff?
06:45 Sheriff Blue Ash
06:46 Sky5 Ok, we're up with ya.
06:48 Sheriff ...they've already called for CFR ...
... about 10 or 15 min out...however
long it takes for them to get goin'
06:57 Sky5 Gotcha. Copy 10 min. We'll stay 2 or
abv 2,000 stay out of your way.
07:11 Sky5 Sky5 helo & Sheriff helo orbiting abt
2 2-1/2 NE of Blue Ash just outside of
275blue


So it appears that the Bonanza was inbound from the north at 6,000'
(5,144' AGL) for left downwind entry to runway six, while the Cessna
had just departed runway six and was at 2,100' (1,244' AGL) at the
time of his last transmission. It would seem that both aircraft would
have had their view of the other obscured by their low/high wing
configurations. Tragic.


------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.faa.gov/data_statistics/accident_incident/preliminary_data/events03/media/03_1835L.txt
************************************************** ******************************
** Report created 5/16/2007 Record 3 **
************************************************** ******************************

IDENTIFICATION
Regis#: 1835L Make/Model: BE36 Description: 36 Bonanza
Date: 05/11/2007 Time: 1903

Event Type: Accident Highest Injury: Fatal Mid Air: Y Missing:
Damage: Destroyed

LOCATION
City: CINCINNATI State: OH Country: US

DESCRIPTION
N6614D, A CESSNA 172 AIRCRAFT AND N1835L, A BEECH V35B AIRCRAFT
COLLIDED IN
MIDAIR 2.5 MILES FROM THE AIRPORT, THERE WERE TWO PERSONS ON BOARD
N6614D,
AND ONE PERSON ON BOARD N1835L, ALL THREE PERSONS ON BOARD THE TWO
AIRCRAFT
WERE FATALLY INJURED, CINCINNATTI, OH

INJURY DATA Total Fatal: 1
# Crew: 1 Fat: 1 Ser: 0 Min: 0
Unk:
# Pass: 0 Fat: 0 Ser: 0 Min: 0
Unk:
# Grnd: Fat: 0 Ser: 0 Min: 0
Unk:

WEATHER: 1852Z 35009KT 10SM BKN130 BKN250 29/11 A2996

OTHER DATA
Activity: Unknown Phase: Unknown Operation: Other


FAA FSDO: CINCINNATI, OH (GL05) Entry date:
05/14/2007

Peter R.
May 16th 07, 06:14 PM
On 5/16/2007 11:48:02 AM, Larry Dighera wrote:

> 10:49 Bonanza N1835L 4 mi ... 6,000' we'll be entering L DW
> for ...6
>

Is this correct, Larry? The pilot stated he was at 6,000 feet and only four
miles from the airport, which has a traffic pattern altitude of approximately
1,800 feet?

--
Peter

Larry Dighera
May 16th 07, 07:06 PM
On Wed, 16 May 2007 13:14:05 -0400, "Peter R." >
wrote in >:

>On 5/16/2007 11:48:02 AM, Larry Dighera wrote:
>
>> 10:49 Bonanza N1835L 4 mi ... 6,000' we'll be entering L DW
>> for ...6
>>
>
>Is this correct, Larry? The pilot stated he was at 6,000 feet and only four
>miles from the airport, which has a traffic pattern altitude of approximately
>1,800 feet?



I found that datum troubling also. The Bonanza would have been
descending rather rapidly to arrive at the pattern entry point at
1,800'. Because the Bonanza reported he was north of the field and
would make a left down wind entry to runway six, he may have been in a
slight right bank at that point obscuring his view of the Cessna out
the side window.

The Cessna pilots transmission is more difficult for me to decipher,
but if he flew a left crosswind after departing runway six, he could
have also been in a bank to the right or left depending on whether he
was departing the pattern on the left 45 or remaining in the pattern.
If the later, his view

Listen to the recording, and see if you agree with what I heard:
http://www.sarangan.org/aviation/scan_audio/2007051115.mp3 Where I
included ellipsis (...) in the Broadcast column, it is meant to
indicate that some of the transmission was unintelligible to me.

john smith
May 16th 07, 08:13 PM
Andrew, have you contacted the Cincinnati FSDO to let them know you have
this?

Andrew Sarangan
May 16th 07, 08:14 PM
Thanks for the transcription of the audio file. I should also add that
my computer's clock was about 9 minutes 30 second behind the official
time, so all the time stamps must be advanced by approx 10 minutes to
be correct.



On May 16, 11:48 am, Larry Dighera > wrote:
> On 15 May 2007 20:08:50 -0700, Andrew Sarangan >
> wrote in . com>:
>
> >I live not too far from the accident scene, and I have a scanner that
> >records all CTAF communications in the vicinity and uploads to my
> >website. I have not searched the audio archives carefully, but perhaps
> >one of you might want to take a look and find if anything relevant to
> >this crash shows up. Here is the link:
>
> >http://www.sarangan.org/aviation/scan_audio/
>
> Yours may be the sole record of these transmissions. Thank you for
> making them available.
>
> From the FAA preliminary information (below):
>
> Date: 05/11/2007
> Time: 1903 UTC
> Time: 15:03 Local (UTC -4:00)
> N6614D, A CESSNA 172
> N1835L, A BEECH V35B
>
> Cincinnati-Blue Ash Airport KISZ
> Elevation: 856 ft.
> Airport Information:http://www.airnav.com/airport/KISZ
> Chart:http://skyvector.com/#21-106-3-2057-1518
>
> Here's what I found on the tapes (probably the last words of the MAC
> pilots):
>
> Audio File: May 11, 2007; 14-15; METAR (KMGY)
> 35009KT 310V020 10SM CLR 28/10
> Position
> In File Aircraft Broadcast
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 10:17 Bonanza N1835L 5 mi N, will be entering L DW Rny6 FS
> 10:25 Cessna N6614D Just departed rny6 ... departing rnwy
> 20 clmbg thru 2,100...Will be looking
> for the Bonanza on...
> 10:49 Bonanza N1835L 4 mi ... 6,000' we'll be entering L DW
> for ...6
>
> Audio File: May 11, 2007; 15-16; METAR (KMGY)
> 02008KT 10SM CLR 28/12
> Position
> In File Aircraft Broadcast
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ...
> 02:43 Helo 6CS is Sky5 about 3 to the S @
> 2,00 mid-field xing NB
> 02:51 Sky5
> 03:00 Sheriff 1,400 aprch frm W
> ...
> 03:50 Sky5 ...275 @ 2,000 in orbit
> 04:26 Sheriff? ... mi NE of Blue Ash
> 06:31 Sky5 Sky5 helo & Sheriff helo orbiting
> about 2 mi NE @ 1,500 to 2,000
> 06:42 Sky5 You call'n Blue Ash or 229 Sheriff?
> 06:45 Sheriff Blue Ash
> 06:46 Sky5 Ok, we're up with ya.
> 06:48 Sheriff ...they've already called for CFR ...
> ... about 10 or 15 min out...however
> long it takes for them to get goin'
> 06:57 Sky5 Gotcha. Copy 10 min. We'll stay 2 or
> abv 2,000 stay out of your way.
> 07:11 Sky5 Sky5 helo & Sheriff helo orbiting abt
> 2 2-1/2 NE of Blue Ash just outside of
> 275blue
>
> So it appears that the Bonanza was inbound from the north at 6,000'
> (5,144' AGL) for left downwind entry to runway six, while the Cessna
> had just departed runway six and was at 2,100' (1,244' AGL) at the
> time of his last transmission. It would seem that both aircraft would
> have had their view of the other obscured by their low/high wing
> configurations. Tragic.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> http://www.faa.gov/data_statistics/accident_incident/preliminary_data...
> ************************************************** *******************************
> ** Report created 5/16/2007 Record 3 **
> ************************************************** *******************************
>
> IDENTIFICATION
> Regis#: 1835L Make/Model: BE36 Description: 36 Bonanza
> Date: 05/11/2007 Time: 1903
>
> Event Type: Accident Highest Injury: Fatal Mid Air: Y Missing:
> Damage: Destroyed
>
> LOCATION
> City: CINCINNATI State: OH Country: US
>
> DESCRIPTION
> N6614D, A CESSNA 172 AIRCRAFT AND N1835L, A BEECH V35B AIRCRAFT
> COLLIDED IN
> MIDAIR 2.5 MILES FROM THE AIRPORT, THERE WERE TWO PERSONS ON BOARD
> N6614D,
> AND ONE PERSON ON BOARD N1835L, ALL THREE PERSONS ON BOARD THE TWO
> AIRCRAFT
> WERE FATALLY INJURED, CINCINNATTI, OH
>
> INJURY DATA Total Fatal: 1
> # Crew: 1 Fat: 1 Ser: 0 Min: 0
> Unk:
> # Pass: 0 Fat: 0 Ser: 0 Min: 0
> Unk:
> # Grnd: Fat: 0 Ser: 0 Min: 0
> Unk:
>
> WEATHER: 1852Z 35009KT 10SM BKN130 BKN250 29/11 A2996
>
> OTHER DATA
> Activity: Unknown Phase: Unknown Operation: Other
>
> FAA FSDO: CINCINNATI, OH (GL05) Entry date:
> 05/14/2007

Larry Dighera
May 16th 07, 08:44 PM
On 16 May 2007 12:14:55 -0700, Andrew Sarangan >
wrote in om>:

>Thanks for the transcription of the audio file.

You are welcome.

>I should also add that my computer's clock was about 9 minutes 30 second
>behind the official time, so all the time stamps must be advanced by
>approx 10 minutes to be correct.

That may be true of the times shown on your web site, but the times
included in my transcription are offsets into the audio files that
have little correlation with time of day, as the receiver's squelch
eliminated all the dead air time.

How have you configured your receiver to record these files? I might
like to do something similar.

john smith[_2_]
May 16th 07, 10:28 PM
Listening to the preceeding/succeeding recordings, all other traffic at
Blue Ash was using R24.

I heard the following...

8:50... unintelligible for Blue Ash

10:15... Blue Ash traffic Bonanza 1835L is five miles north of the field
will be entering left downwind runway six full stop.

10:22...Blue Ash traffic Cessna 6614D has just departed runway six now
departing on a heading 360, climbing through two thousand one hundred
will be looking for the Bonanza on ?.

10:41... Blue Ash traffic Bonanza 35L four miles from the field at 3000
feet will be entering left downwind for runway six.

10:55... a mic is keyed and an unintelligeble, excited voice and audio
squeal can be heard. The transmission last one second.

11:14... Cherokee 3874W calls midfield for right downwind 24.

John Galban
May 16th 07, 11:05 PM
On May 16, 8:48 am, Larry Dighera > wrote:
>
> Audio File: May 11, 2007; 14-15; METAR (KMGY)
> 35009KT 310V020 10SM CLR 28/10
> Position
> In File Aircraft Broadcast
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 10:17 Bonanza N1835L 5 mi N, will be entering L DW Rny6 FS
> 10:25 Cessna N6614D Just departed rny6 ... departing rnwy
> 20 clmbg thru 2,100...Will be looking
> for the Bonanza on...
> 10:49 Bonanza N1835L 4 mi ... 6,000' we'll be entering L DW
> for ...6
>
> So it appears that the Bonanza was inbound from the north at 6,000'
> (5,144' AGL) for left downwind entry to runway six, while the Cessna
> had just departed runway six and was at 2,100' (1,244' AGL) at the
> time of his last transmission.

I don't know if I'd say that. According to your transcript, at
10:25 the Cessna reported departing runway 6, then it appears that was
corrected to runway 20. Maybe I'm reading it wrong? I can't really
tell which runway the Cessna departed from for sure.

John Galban=====>N4BQ (PA28-180)

John Galban
May 16th 07, 11:10 PM
Belay that last post. I just realized that the airport in question
only has runways 6 and 24. Did the pilot of the Cessna know that?
Did he mean 24 when he said 20? He seemed to be trying to correct
something.

John Galban=====>N4BQ (PA28-180)

Andrew Sarangan
May 17th 07, 02:18 AM
On May 16, 2:06 pm, Larry Dighera > wrote:
> On Wed, 16 May 2007 13:14:05 -0400, "Peter R." >
> wrote in >:
>
> >On 5/16/2007 11:48:02 AM, Larry Dighera wrote:
>
> >> 10:49 Bonanza N1835L 4 mi ... 6,000' we'll be entering L DW
> >> for ...6
>
> >Is this correct, Larry? The pilot stated he was at 6,000 feet and only four
> >miles from the airport, which has a traffic pattern altitude of approximately
> >1,800 feet?
>
> I found that datum troubling also. The Bonanza would have been
> descending rather rapidly to arrive at the pattern entry point at
> 1,800'. Because the Bonanza reported he was north of the field and
> would make a left down wind entry to runway six, he may have been in a
> slight right bank at that point obscuring his view of the Cessna out
> the side window.
>
> The Cessna pilots transmission is more difficult for me to decipher,
> but if he flew a left crosswind after departing runway six, he could
> have also been in a bank to the right or left depending on whether he
> was departing the pattern on the left 45 or remaining in the pattern.
> If the later, his view
>
> Listen to the recording, and see if you agree with what I heard:http://www.sarangan.org/aviation/scan_audio/2007051115.mp3 Where I
> included ellipsis (...) in the Broadcast column, it is meant to
> indicate that some of the transmission was unintelligible to me.

I also found that the clock on my computer was approx 9mins 30 seconds
behind the actual time. Also, the transmissions from the Blue Ash
traffic pattern would have been difficult to receive from my rooftop
antenna. I am about 20 NM to the north of Blue Ash and only 1.5NM
south of MGY airport, so any transmissions from MGY would have easily
overridden transmissions from Blue Ash.

Andrew Sarangan
May 17th 07, 03:08 AM
On May 16, 3:44 pm, Larry Dighera > wrote:
> On 16 May 2007 12:14:55 -0700, Andrew Sarangan >
> wrote in om>:
>
> >Thanks for the transcription of the audio file.
>
> You are welcome.
>
> >I should also add that my computer's clock was about 9 minutes 30 second
> >behind the official time, so all the time stamps must be advanced by
> >approx 10 minutes to be correct.
>
> That may be true of the times shown on your web site, but the times
> included in my transcription are offsets into the audio files that
> have little correlation with time of day, as the receiver's squelch
> eliminated all the dead air time.
>
> How have you configured your receiver to record these files? I might
> like to do something similar.


It is not difficult to set this up if you have a linux system. It is
an ordinary scanner, and the audio is fed into the soundcard and
captured using the 'sox' software. Sox has switches for selecting the
input threshold (squech) and to do various processing to create
virtually any output format you like. If you are interested I can
send you the script file (really trivial - it is only one line long).

My setup is primarily limited by the fact that the antenna barely
clears the top of my roof but I still get pretty decent reception out
to 30 miles or so.

Andrew Sarangan
May 17th 07, 03:51 AM
On May 16, 3:44 pm, Larry Dighera > wrote:
> On 16 May 2007 12:14:55 -0700, Andrew Sarangan >
> wrote in om>:
>
> >Thanks for the transcription of the audio file.
>
> You are welcome.
>
> >I should also add that my computer's clock was about 9 minutes 30 second
> >behind the official time, so all the time stamps must be advanced by
> >approx 10 minutes to be correct.
>
> That may be true of the times shown on your web site, but the times
> included in my transcription are offsets into the audio files that
> have little correlation with time of day, as the receiver's squelch
> eliminated all the dead air time.
>
> How have you configured your receiver to record these files? I might
> like to do something similar.

There is some unintelligible audio at 10:54 that sounds like it might
be the same voice as the Bonanza pilot. Then at 10:57 something that
sounds like "you guys too close".

B A R R Y[_2_]
May 17th 07, 01:02 PM
Andrew Sarangan wrote:
> It is not difficult to set this up if you have a linux system. It is
> an ordinary scanner, and the audio is fed into the soundcard and
> captured using the 'sox' software.

There are also several free or very cheap Windows apps that do the same
thing. For years, I recorded scanner audio of the local PD / FD.

Larry Dighera
May 17th 07, 04:52 PM
On Thu, 17 May 2007 12:02:34 GMT, B A R R Y >
wrote in >:

>Andrew Sarangan wrote:
>> It is not difficult to set this up if you have a linux system. It is
>> an ordinary scanner, and the audio is fed into the soundcard and
>> captured using the 'sox' software.
>
>There are also several free or very cheap Windows apps that do the same
>thing. For years, I recorded scanner audio of the local PD / FD.

Will the software you mention not only create the audio files, but FTP
them to a server also?

Andrew Sarangan
May 17th 07, 07:53 PM
On May 17, 11:52 am, Larry Dighera > wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2007 12:02:34 GMT, B A R R Y >
> wrote in >:
>
> >Andrew Sarangan wrote:
> >> It is not difficult to set this up if you have a linux system. It is
> >> an ordinary scanner, and the audio is fed into the soundcard and
> >> captured using the 'sox' software.
>
> >There are also several free or very cheap Windows apps that do the same
> >thing. For years, I recorded scanner audio of the local PD / FD.
>
> Will the software you mention not only create the audio files, but FTP
> them to a server also?

The software resides on my server, so uploading is not an issue for
me.
If you doing it on windows, it may need extra setup. I will write up
something about the setup and post it to my website in the next few
days.

B A R R Y[_2_]
May 18th 07, 11:58 AM
Larry Dighera wrote:
>
> Will the software you mention not only create the audio files, but FTP
> them to a server also?

Probably not, you'd need to script that, or actually save them to the
server.

Andrew Sarangan
May 18th 07, 04:27 PM
On May 18, 6:58 am, B A R R Y > wrote:
> Larry Dighera wrote:
>
> > Will the software you mention not only create the audio files, but FTP
> > them to a server also?
>
> Probably not, you'd need to script that, or actually save them to the
> server.

In my case, I create the mp3 files directly in the public_html
directory on the server, so there is no ftp or scripting involved.
Linux makes this all very easy. I don't know how one would do this on
Windows.

B A R R Y[_2_]
May 18th 07, 05:16 PM
Andrew Sarangan wrote:
>
> In my case, I create the mp3 files directly in the public_html
> directory on the server, so there is no ftp or scripting involved.
> Linux makes this all very easy. I don't know how one would do this on
> Windows.
>


Set the application to save the mp3 file to the public directory? <G>

I don't think that's all that difficult to do in any operating system.

Andrew Sarangan
May 18th 07, 06:51 PM
On May 18, 12:16 pm, B A R R Y > wrote:
> Andrew Sarangan wrote:
>
> > In my case, I create the mp3 files directly in the public_html
> > directory on the server, so there is no ftp or scripting involved.
> > Linux makes this all very easy. I don't know how one would do this on
> > Windows.
>
> Set the application to save the mp3 file to the public directory? <G>
>
> I don't think that's all that difficult to do in any operating system.

Can you schedule tasks on Windows like crontab, and set priorities
with nice? May be it is possible, but my linux machine runs unattended
for years without any trouble. My windows machine needs to be rebooted
every few days because it gets slower and slower the longer it stays
on, and something always crashes requiring a reboot.

B A R R Y[_2_]
May 18th 07, 07:28 PM
Andrew Sarangan wrote:
>
> Can you schedule tasks on Windows like crontab, and set priorities
> with nice?

Sorry!

The only reason I mentioned that you don't NEED Linux to record scanner
audio was simply to point out that it's _possible_ to do so with
Windows, for others who might want to try it.

I have lots of professional experience with lots of operating systems,
including SCO, SunOS, and System V Unix, along with Linux, and really
don't wish to play OS ****ing contests.

Thanks!

CinciGreg
May 19th 07, 07:10 PM
On May 16, 5:28 pm, john smith > wrote:
> Listening to the preceeding/succeeding recordings, all other traffic at
> Blue Ash was using R24.
>
> I heard the following...
>
> 8:50... unintelligible for Blue Ash
>
> 10:15... Blue Ash traffic Bonanza 1835L is five miles north of the field
> will be entering left downwind runway six full stop.
>
> 10:22...Blue Ash traffic Cessna 6614D has just departed runway six now
> departing on a heading 360, climbing through two thousand one hundred
> will be looking for the Bonanza on ?.
>
> 10:41... Blue Ash traffic Bonanza 35L four miles from the field at 3000
> feet will be entering left downwind for runway six.
>
> 10:55... a mic is keyed and an unintelligeble, excited voice and audio
> squeal can be heard. The transmission last one second.
>
> 11:14... Cherokee 3874W calls midfield for right downwind 24.


That file is only 10:13 duration, I've searched the ones before and
after... I downloaded it again to be sure, and still get a file that
ends before either of these planes make a call. The one after it,
nothing but mention of the aftermath. I've tried a bunch of them
now... where'd I take the wrong turn?

Andrew Sarangan
May 19th 07, 07:53 PM
On May 19, 2:10 pm, CinciGreg > wrote:
> On May 16, 5:28 pm, john smith > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Listening to the preceeding/succeeding recordings, all other traffic at
> > Blue Ash was using R24.
>
> > I heard the following...
>
> > 8:50... unintelligible for Blue Ash
>
> > 10:15... Blue Ash traffic Bonanza 1835L is five miles north of the field
> > will be entering left downwind runway six full stop.
>
> > 10:22...Blue Ash traffic Cessna 6614D has just departed runway six now
> > departing on a heading 360, climbing through two thousand one hundred
> > will be looking for the Bonanza on ?.
>
> > 10:41... Blue Ash traffic Bonanza 35L four miles from the field at 3000
> > feet will be entering left downwind for runway six.
>
> > 10:55... a mic is keyed and an unintelligeble, excited voice and audio
> > squeal can be heard. The transmission last one second.
>
> > 11:14... Cherokee 3874W calls midfield for right downwind 24.
>
> That file is only 10:13 duration, I've searched the ones before and
> after... I downloaded it again to be sure, and still get a file that
> ends before either of these planes make a call. The one after it,
> nothing but mention of the aftermath. I've tried a bunch of them
> now... where'd I take the wrong turn?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

The file for 1400-1500 is 12mins 3 secs
The file for 1500-1600 is 10mins 13secs

So you might be looking at the wrong file.

john smith
May 19th 07, 09:47 PM
I downloaded the trial version of Adobe Audition to see if I could clean
up the audio. Unfortunately, the trial version does not allow access to
any of the filters. Does anyone have any software that can perform this
function?

8:50... unintelligible for Blue Ash

10:15... Blue Ash traffic Bonanza 1835L is five miles north of the field
will be entering left downwind runway six full stop.

10:22...Blue Ash traffic Cessna 6614D has just departed runway six now
departing on a heading 360, climbing through two thousand one hundred
will be looking for the Bonanza on the inbound.

10:41... Blue Ash traffic Bonanza 35L four miles from the field at 3000
feet will be entering left downwind for runway six.

10:55... a mic is keyed and an unintelligeble, excited voice and audio
squeal can be heard. The transmission lasts one second.

11:14... Cherokee 3874W calls midfield for right downwind 24.

Andrew Sarangan
May 19th 07, 11:18 PM
On May 19, 4:47 pm, john smith > wrote:
> I downloaded the trial version of Adobe Audition to see if I could clean
> up the audio. Unfortunately, the trial version does not allow access to
> any of the filters. Does anyone have any software that can perform this
> function?
>

Have you tried Goldwave? It is a shareware. I used it before, and was
quite impressed with the functions. I do not recall if it had
functions to do filtering.

Peter R.
May 19th 07, 11:31 PM
On 5/19/2007 4:47:08 PM, john smith wrote:

> Does anyone have any software that can perform this
> function?
>

Give Audacity a try. It is free under the Open Source license and is a pretty
powerful audio file editing tool:

http://audacity.sourceforge.net/

--
Peter

Dylan Smith
May 21st 07, 11:38 AM
On 2007-05-17, Andrew Sarangan > wrote:
> I also found that the clock on my computer was approx 9mins 30 seconds
> behind the actual time.

See 'man ntpd' and /etc/ntp.conf - very useful for keeping the
dreadfully inaccurate clock on a server in check.

--
Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid.
Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de

Google