root[_2_]
May 31st 07, 08:37 PM
On May 31, 7:48 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> root > wrote in news:1180634234.430134.309100
> @g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com:
>
> > I've x-posted to alt.disasters.aviation for some verification of this
> > 'Psychic' claim.
>
> > Is Bertie the Bunyip in the house?
>
> What kind of verification are you looking for?
>
> pretty unlikely, for several reasons,
>
> 1. Lightning strikes are common. I've been hit a couple of dozen times
> and only once was my airplane damaged in any way and that was very very
> minor.
> sometimes electronics get damaged, but it's rarely more than minimal
> and never enough to bring an airplane down.
>
> 2. Computers are only used as a very last resort in avoiding collisons
> and even then, never on the ground.
>
> 3. there are lots of back up systems on every airplane, some are pretty
> primitive, but they're all more than enough to fly the airplane safely.
> Air Force one would have more than the usual installations. The damned
> thing is bomb proof.
>
> 4. It's Air Force one, for ****'s sake! They don't let anything move
> within miles of it! It's a complete pain in the ass when the *******s
> are in town. I was stuck on the ground for three hours once waiting for
> one of the *******s to move and on another occasion I was delayed 12
> hours (as a passenger) and the ******* didn't even land at the airport I
> was going to! he landed at one 130 miles away at the last minute, the
> original destination was a red herring! The point is, the airplane is so
> well covered it's virtually impossible for it to get into that
> situation.
>
> 5. How could it possibly be covered up, for ****'s sake?
>
> It's so stupid a notion that if it were a movie I wouldn't watch it if
> you paid me.
>
> However, maybe you'd better ask MXSMANIC if he could simulate it on his
> PC. That'd be the acid test
>
> Bertie
Thank you kindly.
BTW, are you still taunting the 'nazis', as you call them?
golwg
Matthew
> root > wrote in news:1180634234.430134.309100
> @g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com:
>
> > I've x-posted to alt.disasters.aviation for some verification of this
> > 'Psychic' claim.
>
> > Is Bertie the Bunyip in the house?
>
> What kind of verification are you looking for?
>
> pretty unlikely, for several reasons,
>
> 1. Lightning strikes are common. I've been hit a couple of dozen times
> and only once was my airplane damaged in any way and that was very very
> minor.
> sometimes electronics get damaged, but it's rarely more than minimal
> and never enough to bring an airplane down.
>
> 2. Computers are only used as a very last resort in avoiding collisons
> and even then, never on the ground.
>
> 3. there are lots of back up systems on every airplane, some are pretty
> primitive, but they're all more than enough to fly the airplane safely.
> Air Force one would have more than the usual installations. The damned
> thing is bomb proof.
>
> 4. It's Air Force one, for ****'s sake! They don't let anything move
> within miles of it! It's a complete pain in the ass when the *******s
> are in town. I was stuck on the ground for three hours once waiting for
> one of the *******s to move and on another occasion I was delayed 12
> hours (as a passenger) and the ******* didn't even land at the airport I
> was going to! he landed at one 130 miles away at the last minute, the
> original destination was a red herring! The point is, the airplane is so
> well covered it's virtually impossible for it to get into that
> situation.
>
> 5. How could it possibly be covered up, for ****'s sake?
>
> It's so stupid a notion that if it were a movie I wouldn't watch it if
> you paid me.
>
> However, maybe you'd better ask MXSMANIC if he could simulate it on his
> PC. That'd be the acid test
>
> Bertie
Thank you kindly.
BTW, are you still taunting the 'nazis', as you call them?
golwg
Matthew