View Full Version : I'll Drop The Bomb on You, Baby!
Russell Underwood
June 23rd 07, 11:58 PM
Maybe we should have played that over loud speakers to force the Germans to
surrender?
Anyhow, this is the bomb bay of AAF 44-85740 Aluminum Overcast at Newport
News, VA on 13Sep95. I am lying on my back beneath the plane, with a 28mm
lens, and it was still a tight squeeze. Barely visible is the narrow walkway
through the bomb bay.
Russell Underwood
June 24th 07, 12:02 AM
I forgot to ask....
What do the number of stripes indicate on each bomb?
I have no idea what the duct tape is for.<BG>
Thanks!
Russell Underwood
Clairbear
June 24th 07, 12:40 AM
"Russell Underwood" > wrote in news:2Ehfi.158216$dC2.53204
@newsfe13.lga:
>
> I forgot to ask....
>
> What do the number of stripes indicate on each bomb?
> I have no idea what the duct tape is for.<BG>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Russell Underwood
>
>
Ancient Chinese secret.
Or perhaps code as to type of expolsive? or some got bored one day?
Dave Kearton
June 24th 07, 12:55 AM
Russell Underwood wrote:
>> I forgot to ask....
>>
>> What do the number of stripes indicate on each bomb?
>> I have no idea what the duct tape is for.<BG>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Russell Underwood
Some of the answers will be found at the bottom of this pic.
Now, looking for the page on duct tape.
--
Cheers
Dave Kearton
Russell Underwood
June 24th 07, 01:07 AM
> Some of the answers will be found at the bottom of this pic.
>
>
>
> Now, looking for the page on duct tape.
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Cheers
>
> Dave Kearton
>
>
>
Thank you!
Russell Underwood
Dave Kearton
June 24th 07, 01:13 AM
Russell Underwood wrote:
>>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> Russell Underwood
No probs Russ
--
Cheers
Dave Kearton
MaXiLeeCH
June 24th 07, 01:55 AM
"Russell Underwood" > wrote in message
...
> Maybe we should have played that over loud speakers to force the Germans
> to surrender?
>
> Anyhow, this is the bomb bay of AAF 44-85740 Aluminum Overcast at Newport
> News, VA on 13Sep95. I am lying on my back beneath the plane, with a 28mm
> lens, and it was still a tight squeeze. Barely visible is the narrow
> walkway through the bomb bay.
>
Hi Russell,
Whilst it is an impressive shot, I cant help but wonder if there ever was a
similar shot taken of an Avro Lancasters bomb bay that was filled up with
either a 'Tall Boy' 6 ton or a "Grand Slam' 10 ton bomb.
Now, they were BOMBS. :-)
--
Jeff Cochrane - VK4BOF
Atherton
Queensland 4883
Richard Goldsberry
June 24th 07, 07:42 AM
These "bombs" look like the training bombs filled with water and sand to
approx. the weight of the real McCoy.
The filler cap is on the top of the bomb.
The "fuze" is a pipe into which is inserted a "shotgun" style smoke charge
giving accurate spotting where the bomb landed.
Dick...
"Russell Underwood" > wrote in message
...
> Maybe we should have played that over loud speakers to force the Germans
> to surrender?
>
> Anyhow, this is the bomb bay of AAF 44-85740 Aluminum Overcast at Newport
> News, VA on 13Sep95. I am lying on my back beneath the plane, with a 28mm
> lens, and it was still a tight squeeze. Barely visible is the narrow
> walkway through the bomb bay.
>
>
Russell Underwood
June 24th 07, 01:16 PM
"Richard Goldsberry" > wrote in message
...
> These "bombs" look like the training bombs filled with water and sand to
> approx. the weight of the real McCoy.
> The filler cap is on the top of the bomb.
> The "fuze" is a pipe into which is inserted a "shotgun" style smoke charge
> giving accurate spotting where the bomb landed.
> Dick...
>
(with a snicker...)
That would definately explain the duct tape.
The steel looks a little thin as well.
Thanks!
Russell Underwood
John[_8_]
June 26th 07, 03:22 AM
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 02:42:54 -0400, "Richard Goldsberry"
> wrote:
>These "bombs" look like the training bombs filled with water and sand to
>approx. the weight of the real McCoy.
Actually, they are likely filled with only air. The FAA gets really
upset when you load live ordinance on a non-military (active)
aircarft. Training loads with smoke charges actually fall in the same
category. I doubt if "Aluminum Overcast" ever actually drops anything.
Getting permission to do that would be pretty difficult (there is
always the possibility of inadvertant drops) I would think.
Even for active duty types on a scheduled mission, the paperwork and
opportunities to explain onesself are quite amazing when you drop even
a training round where it wasn't supposed to be. When I was an IP in
the training command in S. Texas, we had a student that, unknowingly,
lost a MK-76 (http://www.ordnance.org/practice.htm) onto a van parked
in a town enroute to the target. The solo student leading the flight
also was impressed by the effect of his taking the flight OVER the
town instead of AROUND it as briefed. Oh, the IP's in the flight had
no time to correct the situation as the town was just south of the
field and the student was supposed to delay the departure turn to
target until past it, but turned right after cleanup.
No one saw the bomb leave the aircraft because it was #4 in the
formation. He had a "no spot" during the runs but all aircraft were
clean on joinup for the trip home. It was not until after they got
back were the pieces put together as to what had actually happened.
John Alger USN(ret)
1972-1997 // 1310,1320
TA-4J, A-7E, EC-130Q, P-3B
Richard Goldsberry
June 26th 07, 03:54 AM
I did not mean to indicate that these particular training bombs would be
filled with water and sand with a smoke charge!
I was trying to educate those interested that this particular type of
ORDNANCE was used in the distant pass.
As you being an old Naval Aviator I would guess even before your time. I
was a CWO Gunner (Aviation Ordnance) for 27 years and all tail hook
squadrons,
A4, A7, F4, & F-18. All combat squadrons. Please note the spelling of
ORDNANCE. A lawyer I'm not!
I once had a helo ride to the Pinecastle range in Florida and saw where
Mk-76's repeatedly penetrated through both sides of M113A1 Armored Personnel
Carriers.
Check-six,
Dick
"John" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 02:42:54 -0400, "Richard Goldsberry"
> > wrote:
>
>>These "bombs" look like the training bombs filled with water and sand to
>>approx. the weight of the real McCoy.
>
> Actually, they are likely filled with only air. The FAA gets really
> upset when you load live ordinance on a non-military (active)
> aircarft. Training loads with smoke charges actually fall in the same
> category. I doubt if "Aluminum Overcast" ever actually drops anything.
> Getting permission to do that would be pretty difficult (there is
> always the possibility of inadvertant drops) I would think.
>
> Even for active duty types on a scheduled mission, the paperwork and
> opportunities to explain onesself are quite amazing when you drop even
> a training round where it wasn't supposed to be. When I was an IP in
> the training command in S. Texas, we had a student that, unknowingly,
> lost a MK-76 (http://www.ordnance.org/practice.htm) onto a van parked
> in a town enroute to the target. The solo student leading the flight
> also was impressed by the effect of his taking the flight OVER the
> town instead of AROUND it as briefed. Oh, the IP's in the flight had
> no time to correct the situation as the town was just south of the
> field and the student was supposed to delay the departure turn to
> target until past it, but turned right after cleanup.
>
> No one saw the bomb leave the aircraft because it was #4 in the
> formation. He had a "no spot" during the runs but all aircraft were
> clean on joinup for the trip home. It was not until after they got
> back were the pieces put together as to what had actually happened.
>
> John Alger USN(ret)
> 1972-1997 // 1310,1320
> TA-4J, A-7E, EC-130Q, P-3B
Russell Underwood
June 26th 07, 02:02 PM
Neat story. Thanks!
The "bombs" are just shells. As stated, it is now considered an experimental
civilian aircraft, so no live-working armaments of any type are permitted.
Most of the B17s I have had the chance to tour do not even have the motors
for the turrets in them. Only the bubble attached to the fusalage.
One note on the bomb bay doors, however. It seems that all B17s I have
visited still have the bomb bay trap door mechanisms in-tact. This was in
case a bomb were to come lose from the rack, the door would open under the
weight of the bomb, and allow the bomb to fall free of the aircraft. You
would'nt want a bomb rolling around in the plane! It also provided an
emergency exit for many unfortunate crew members whose plane was going down.
We were told on our flight that if we dropped something onto the doors while
in the air, to let it lay there until we landed. If we tried to retrieve it
in the air, we would exit the plane in a hurry.
Russell Underwood
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.