T-28 Trojan

[Glenn[_2_]]

[Dave Kearton]

"Glenn" > wrote in message
...
|



Glenn, I really admire the colours on your shots, I don't recall ever
seeing one where the saturation isn't perfect. Do you concentrate on
this a lot, while you're taking the pic or afterwards ?




--

Cheers

Dave Kearton

[Glenn[_2_]]

"Dave Kearton" > wrote in message
...
> "Glenn" > wrote in message
> ...
> |
>
>
>
> Glenn, I really admire the colours on your shots, I don't recall ever
> seeing one where the saturation isn't perfect. Do you concentrate
> on
> this a lot, while you're taking the pic or afterwards ?
>
>
I treat them all on their merits. I think all I did with these last ones was
to darken them a bit to look better on my monitor. I did add saturation to
the Mirage and the Harvard
with teh tractor as I didn't like the lighting conditions at the time

[Glenn[_2_]]

"Dave Kearton" > wrote in message
...
> "Glenn" > wrote in message
> ...
> |
>
>
>
> Glenn, I really admire the colours on your shots, I don't recall ever
> seeing one where the saturation isn't perfect. Do you concentrate
> on
> this a lot, while you're taking the pic or afterwards ?
>
>
This shot is as is from the camera. No adjustments, only resizing. No
sharpening either.
Only the text added.

I find though that every time I use a different computer the results are
heaps different. I have been looking at some of my
previous uplaods and they are horrible (on this new monitor) but they were
from how I had it calibrated for the print lab I use.

So I am going blind on this one as I have not had anything printed in
several months.

[Dave Kearton]

"Glenn" > wrote in message
...
| This shot is as is from the camera. No adjustments, only resizing. No
| sharpening either.
| Only the text added.
|
| I find though that every time I use a different computer the results are
| heaps different. I have been looking at some of my
| previous uplaods and they are horrible (on this new monitor) but they were
| from how I had it calibrated for the print lab I use.
|
| So I am going blind on this one as I have not had anything printed in
| several months.
|




So your camera is set on 'rich', so you can 'lean' it off a little in the
lab ?


I noticed that my pics look a little different on my screen as compared to
my daughter's, just not enough to justify a new monitor.




--

Cheers

Dave Kearton

[Glenn[_2_]]

"Dave Kearton" > wrote in message
...
> "Glenn" > wrote in message
> ...
> | This shot is as is from the camera. No adjustments, only resizing. No
> | sharpening either.
> | Only the text added.
> |
> | I find though that every time I use a different computer the results are
> | heaps different. I have been looking at some of my
> | previous uplaods and they are horrible (on this new monitor) but they
> were
> | from how I had it calibrated for the print lab I use.
> |
> | So I am going blind on this one as I have not had anything printed in
> | several months.
> |
>
>
>
>
> So your camera is set on 'rich', so you can 'lean' it off a little in the
> lab ?

Nope. I think the canon 20D might be one notch above default but the Nikon
D100 and the Olympus E300 are factory default. I will have to check to see
what I have set on the 400D.
I don't recall adjusting anything on that one.

>
> I noticed that my pics look a little different on my screen as compared to
> my daughter's, just not enough to justify a new monitor.
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Cheers
>
> Dave Kearton
>
>

[Joseph Testagrose]

Do you have a shot of the complete aircraft, with all of the wings?
Joe.
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 00:46:03 GMT, "Glenn" >
wrote:

[Joseph Testagrose]

Do you have a shot of the entire aircraft showing all of both wings?
Joe.
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 08:32:48 GMT, "Glenn" >
wrote:

>
>"Dave Kearton" > wrote in message
...
>> "Glenn" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> |
>>
>>
>>
>> Glenn, I really admire the colours on your shots, I don't recall ever
>> seeing one where the saturation isn't perfect. Do you concentrate
>> on
>> this a lot, while you're taking the pic or afterwards ?
>>
>>
>This shot is as is from the camera. No adjustments, only resizing. No
>sharpening either.
>Only the text added.
>
>I find though that every time I use a different computer the results are
>heaps different. I have been looking at some of my
>previous uplaods and they are horrible (on this new monitor) but they were
>from how I had it calibrated for the print lab I use.
>
>So I am going blind on this one as I have not had anything printed in
>several months.

[Jim Morris[_2_]]

Joe go to his website. Over 10000 images and yes he has everything you are
asking for.

www.warbirdz.net

Jim Morris





"Joseph Testagrose" > wrote in message
...
> Do you have a shot of the complete aircraft, with all of the wings?
> Joe.
> On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 00:46:03 GMT, "Glenn" >
> wrote:
>
>

[Scott Mayfield]

Thanks Glenn. I was in charge of the Recip shop in VA122 for a couple of
happy years. We had about ten T-28s, one A1E and one C1A. A great tour of
duty.

SM

"Glenn" > wrote in message
...
>

[Ron Monroe]

It's the stupid moinitors. I had a bunch that were too dark. So, I lightened
them up. On other people's computers, they look too light. I learned from a
friend, who had the same problem, until he bought a different monitor. The
problem is, the monitors need to be calibrated properly. Otherwise, some are
too contrasty. I tried to calibrate mine, but, everything but the photos
looked over-exposed. I connected my computer to my already calibrated HD-TV,
and it made a world of difference. Higher resolution and better color and
contrast. Not all monitors were created equal.
Ron

"Glenn" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Dave Kearton" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Glenn" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> |
>>
>>
>>
>> Glenn, I really admire the colours on your shots, I don't recall ever
>> seeing one where the saturation isn't perfect. Do you concentrate
>> on
>> this a lot, while you're taking the pic or afterwards ?
>>
>>
> This shot is as is from the camera. No adjustments, only resizing. No
> sharpening either.
> Only the text added.
>
> I find though that every time I use a different computer the results are
> heaps different. I have been looking at some of my
> previous uplaods and they are horrible (on this new monitor) but they were
> from how I had it calibrated for the print lab I use.
>
> So I am going blind on this one as I have not had anything printed in
> several months.
>
>

[john smith]

I purchased the Spyder2Pro calibrator to keep my monitors properly set.
It's not inexpensive, but worth it to keep everything looking the way it
should. We have 8 LCD monitors in the house, so it gets used. It can
also be used on the new digital televisions.

Ron Monroe wrote:
> It's the stupid moinitors. I had a bunch that were too dark. So, I lightened
> them up. On other people's computers, they look too light. I learned from a
> friend, who had the same problem, until he bought a different monitor. The
> problem is, the monitors need to be calibrated properly. Otherwise, some are
> too contrasty. I tried to calibrate mine, but, everything but the photos
> looked over-exposed. I connected my computer to my already calibrated HD-TV,
> and it made a world of difference. Higher resolution and better color and
> contrast. Not all monitors were created equal.
> Ron