Re: How Advanced Are A Type lll Civilization Just Ask THe Science Officers About The Seans

[Michael Baldwin, Bruce[_2_]]

nightsoil wrote:
> nightsoil wrote
>
> How far advanced are the net Darla Seans, most likely a
> class lll type civilization or better.
>
> See:
> http://www.mkaku.org/articles/physics_of_et.html
>
> What civilization class are Earthlings, a deduced type 0, oh the
> humanity!!!!!! It must be those darn silly auk coffeeboys, always
> bringing the grading curve scale down. Sheesh! If it wasn't for the net
> profound advanced Earth Science Team Officers always bumping and lifting
> ratings higher the planet civilization rating would most likely be even
> lower and hit -0 if that is even possible for displayed clueless auk
> sentient multi sock fake award living species.
>
> get the rantings up,
> the FrOOtL00p

Darla is farther away than you can ever imagine, FrOOtL00p.

[Double-A]

On Jul 29, 6:09 pm, "Michael Baldwin, Bruce" >
wrote:
> nightsoil wrote:
> > nightsoil wrote
>
> > How far advanced are the net Darla Seans, most likely a
> > class lll type civilization or better.
>
> > See:
> >http://www.mkaku.org/articles/physics_of_et.html
>
> > What civilization class are Earthlings, a deduced type 0, oh the
> > humanity!!!!!! It must be those darn silly auk coffeeboys, always
> > bringing the grading curve scale down. Sheesh! If it wasn't for the net
> > profound advanced Earth Science Team Officers always bumping and lifting
> > ratings higher the planet civilization rating would most likely be even
> > lower and hit -0 if that is even possible for displayed clueless auk
> > sentient multi sock fake award living species.
>
> > get the rantings up,
> > the FrOOtL00p
>
> Darla is farther away than you can ever imagine, FrOOtL00p.


Bruce, if you keep posting to alt.astronomy, people might start
thinking it's kooky!

Double-A