I have always suspected......................................... ...............

[Hef]

I have always suspected that correctness, is the refuse of those who have
nothing to offer.

[Jerry Springer]

Hef wrote:
> I have always suspected that correctness, is the refuse of those who have
> nothing to offer.

The Wingnut has spoken, thought you did not have time to read here any more?

[Peter Gottlieb]

It seems likely that you are correct, sir.


"Hef" > wrote in message
...
> I have always suspected that correctness, is the refuse of those who have
> nothing to offer.

[[email protected]]

On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 18:59:32 GMT, Jerry Springer
> wrote:

:Hef wrote:
:> I have always suspected that correctness, is the refuse of those who have
:> nothing to offer.
:
:The Wingnut has spoken, thought you did not have time to read here any more?

Since he's making $10 million a year now, it just cost him $20 to
write that.

But it's probably not him, since it didn't have any obscene language
in it.

[Ken Sandyeggo]

(Hef) wrote in message >...
> I have always suspected that correctness, is the refuse of those who have
> nothing to offer.

Did you maybe mean "refuge?"

[Richard Lamb]

Peter Gottlieb wrote:
>
> It seems likely that you are correct, sir.
>
> "Hef" > wrote in message
> ...
> > I have always suspected that correctness, is the refuse of those who have
> > nothing to offer.


And that polite conversation ended when gentlemen quit wearing
sidearms...

[Rich Ahrens]

wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 18:59:32 GMT, Jerry Springer
> > wrote:
>
> :Hef wrote:
> :> I have always suspected that correctness, is the refuse of those who have
> :> nothing to offer.
> :
> :The Wingnut has spoken, thought you did not have time to read here any more?
>
> Since he's making $10 million a year now, it just cost him $20 to
> write that.
>
> But it's probably not him, since it didn't have any obscene language
> in it.

On the other hand, the complete lack of meaningful content is consistent
with his usual effort...

[RobertR237]

In article >,
(Ken Sandyeggo) writes:

>
(Hef) wrote in message
>...
>> I have always suspected that correctness, is the refuse of those who have
>> nothing to offer.
>
>Did you maybe mean "refuge?"
>
>

Don't confuse the boy.


Bob Reed
www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site)
KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress....

"Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice,
pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!"
(M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman)

[Corrie]

(Ken Sandyeggo) wrote in message >...
> (Hef) wrote in message >...
> > I have always suspected that correctness, is the refuse of those who have
> > nothing to offer.
>
> Did you maybe mean "refuge?"

Maybe, but 'refuse' works, too. It can be used as a noun - it means
trash, garbage, that-which-is-discarded. Those who have nothing to
offer throw correctness on the junk heap. Awkward construction, but
it works.

In a backfiring sort of way, I suspect. :-D

[Jerry Springer]

Corrie wrote:
> (Ken Sandyeggo) wrote in message >...
>
(Hef) wrote in message >...
>>
>>>I have always suspected that correctness, is the refuse of those who have
>>>nothing to offer.
>>
>>Did you maybe mean "refuge?"
>
>
> Maybe, but 'refuse' works, too. It can be used as a noun - it means
> trash, garbage, that-which-is-discarded. Those who have nothing to
> offer throw correctness on the junk heap. Awkward construction, but
> it works.
>
> In a backfiring sort of way, I suspect. :-D

Yes, you are a good example.

[Corrie]

Jerry Springer > wrote in message >...
> Corrie wrote:
> > (Ken Sandyeggo) wrote in message >...
> >
> (Hef) wrote in message >...
> >>
> >>>I have always suspected that correctness, is the refuse of those who have
> >>>nothing to offer.
> >>
> >>Did you maybe mean "refuge?"
> >
> > Maybe, but 'refuse' works, too. It can be used as a noun - it means
> > trash, garbage, that-which-is-discarded. Those who have nothing to
> > offer throw correctness on the junk heap. Awkward construction, but
> > it works.
> >
> > In a backfiring sort of way, I suspect. :-D
>
> Yes, you are a good example.

In the present case, Jer, it's more a case of pearls before swine, but
feel free to think what you like. It don't bother me none.

[Barnyard BOb --]

Rich Ahrens wrote:

>> :Hef wrote:
>> :> I have always suspected that correctness, is the refuse of those who have
>> :> nothing to offer.
>> :
>> :The Wingnut has spoken, thought you did not have time to read here any more?
>>
>> Since he's making $10 million a year now, it just cost him $20 to
>> write that.
>>
>> But it's probably not him, since it didn't have any obscene language
>> in it.
>


>On the other hand, the complete lack of meaningful content is consistent
>with his usual effort...
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Yes, sir.
Truer words have never been spoken.

Although Wingbrat is chronologically older,
he mentally is in the same old stunted juvenile rut.


Barnyard BOb --

[RobertR237]

In article >, Barnyard BOb --
> writes:

>
>Yes, sir.
>Truer words have never been spoken.
>
>Although Wingbrat is chronologically older,
>he mentally is in the same old stunted juvenile rut.
>
>
>Barnyard BOb --
>
>

Yes but when he was 14 you could excuse it as youthful ignorance. What is his
excuse now?

Willful stupidity!


Bob Reed
www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site)
KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress....

"Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice,
pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!"
(M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman)