C132InFlt.jpg

[[email protected]]

[Orval Fairbairn]

In article >,
wrote:

> begin 644 C132InFlt.jpg
> [Image]
>
> end

I don't think that the C-132 ever made it off the drawing boards!

[Randy Wilson]

Actually a Douglas C-133 I'm pretty sure. The C-132 was cancelled.

Randy

[[email protected]]

On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 14:46:59 -0400, Orval Fairbairn
> wrote:

>In article >,
> wrote:
>
>> begin 644 C132InFlt.jpg
>> [Image]
>>
>> end
>
>I don't think that the C-132 ever made it off the drawing boards!
Right

[Orval Fairbairn]

In article >,
"Randy Wilson" > wrote:

> Actually a Douglas C-133 I'm pretty sure. The C-132 was cancelled.
>
> Randy

The drawing depicts the XC-132, not the C-133.

[Ron Monroe]

The C-133 had a long thin fuselage with a very straight wing. The C-132
looked like a Boeing 377 Stratocruiser with a high swept wing and
turboprops, which is what this picture depicts. It was meant to be much
larger than the C-133. It's an artist's rendering of what was proposed, not
what was built.
Ron

"Randy Wilson" > wrote in message
...
> Actually a Douglas C-133 I'm pretty sure. The C-132 was cancelled.
>
> Randy
>
>

[Randy Wilson]

I did not really notice the swept wings so you are most likely correct it is
not a picture but a rendering of a C-132. It is a bit busy here in Midland,
Tx as this is AIRSHO week for the CAF - my only excuse ;-)

Randy

"Ron Monroe" > wrote in message
...
> The C-133 had a long thin fuselage with a very straight wing. The C-132
> looked like a Boeing 377 Stratocruiser with a high swept wing and
> turboprops, which is what this picture depicts. It was meant to be much
> larger than the C-133. It's an artist's rendering of what was proposed,
> not what was built.
> Ron
>
> "Randy Wilson" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Actually a Douglas C-133 I'm pretty sure. The C-132 was cancelled.
>>
>> Randy
>>
>>
>
>