Re: School massacres only meant to discredit the NRA

[Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]]

wrote in news:23e736d2-3743-4ab9-be9d-e3d15bf7ce36
@q77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:

> It is amazing that so many people just do not understand that all the
> murderers who go on shooting rampages and kill students and others
> are
> doing it for the sole purpose of discrediting the NRA. Call it an
> asymmetric campaign to expand gun control laws. Virgina Tech was the
> latest example of the despicable tactic of a student killing others
> to
> attack the good name of the NRA. Shame on the parents of the dead
> for
> falling for that obvious trick.
> After all, we have all seen the actions of the detainees at
> Guantanamo. They kill and injure themselves just to discredit the
> US,
> no other reason than that.
> [WJ20K]
>

Found this elsewhere. thought some of the gun nuts might find a use for it.


Bertie

[Robert M. Gary]

On Jan 18, 3:39*pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> wrote in news:23e736d2-3743-4ab9-be9d-e3d15bf7ce36
> @q77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
>
>
> > It is amazing that so many people just do not understand that all the
> > murderers who go on shooting rampages and kill students and others
> > are
> > doing it for the sole purpose of discrediting the NRA. *Call it an
> > asymmetric campaign to expand gun control laws. *Virgina Tech was the
> > latest example of the despicable tactic of a student killing others
> > to
> > attack the good name of the NRA. *Shame on the parents of the dead
> > for
> > falling for that obvious trick.
> > After all, we have all seen the actions of the detainees at
> > Guantanamo. *They kill and injure themselves just to discredit the
> > US,
> > no other reason than that.
> > [WJ20K]
>
> Found this elsewhere. thought some of the gun nuts might find a use for it..
>
> Bertie- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

What is that suppose to prove? It certainly says nothing of the NRA,
it only shows you found a liberal nut on the internet.
Congratulations.

-Robert

[Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]]

"Robert M. Gary" > wrote in
:

> On Jan 18, 3:39*pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> wrote in news:23e736d2-3743-4ab9-be9d-e3d15bf7ce36
>> @q77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > It is amazing that so many people just do not understand that all
>> > the murderers who go on shooting rampages and kill students and
>> > others are
>> > doing it for the sole purpose of discrediting the NRA. *Call it an
>> > asymmetric campaign to expand gun control laws. *Virgina Tech was
>> > the latest example of the despicable tactic of a student killing
>> > others to
>> > attack the good name of the NRA. *Shame on the parents of the dead
>> > for
>> > falling for that obvious trick.
>> > After all, we have all seen the actions of the detainees at
>> > Guantanamo. *They kill and injure themselves just to discredit the
>> > US,
>> > no other reason than that.
>> > [WJ20K]
>>
>> Found this elsewhere. thought some of the gun nuts might find a use
>> for it
> .
>>
>> Bertie- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> What is that suppose to prove? It certainly says nothing of the NRA,
> it only shows you found a liberal nut on the internet.


Hey, I was only trying to help you guys out.

Makes more sense than your arguments, after all.

Bertie

[Robert M. Gary]

On Jan 18, 4:13*pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:

> Makes more sense than your arguments, after all.
>
> Bertie

In your mind; I don't doubt it.

-Robert

[Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]]

"Robert M. Gary" > wrote in news:2eb75b5c-4319-4c85-a1a7-
:

> On Jan 18, 4:13*pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>
>> Makes more sense than your arguments, after all.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> In your mind; I don't doubt it.
>

Thank you. It's not often I get the recognition i deserve.

Bertie

[[email protected]]

On Jan 19, 12:05 am, "Robert M. Gary" > wrote:
> On Jan 18, 3:39 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>
>
>
> > wrote in news:23e736d2-3743-4ab9-be9d-e3d15bf7ce36
> > @q77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
>
> > > It is amazing that so many people just do not understand that all the
> > > murderers who go on shooting rampages and kill students and others
> > > are
> > > doing it for the sole purpose of discrediting the NRA. Call it an
> > > asymmetric campaign to expand gun control laws. Virgina Tech was the
> > > latest example of the despicable tactic of a student killing others
> > > to
> > > attack the good name of the NRA. Shame on the parents of the dead
> > > for
> > > falling for that obvious trick.
> > > After all, we have all seen the actions of the detainees at
> > > Guantanamo. They kill and injure themselves just to discredit the
> > > US,
> > > no other reason than that.
> > > [WJ20K]
>
> > Found this elsewhere. thought some of the gun nuts might find a use for it.
>
> > Bertie- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> What is that suppose to prove? It certainly says nothing of the NRA,
> it only shows you found a liberal nut on the internet.
> Congratulations.
>
> -Robert

It proves how stupid the US military is to make comments that they
think are logical but are only idiocy.
[WJ20K]

[Denny]

>
> > What is that suppose to prove? It certainly says nothing of the NRA,
> > it only shows you found a liberal nut on the internet.
> > Congratulations.

Obviously sarcasm was wasted on this bunch...

[[email protected]]

On Jan 19, 6:17 am, wrote:
>
> It proves how stupid the US military is to make comments that they
> think are logical but are only idiocy.
> [WJ20K]

The "US Military" makes no statements and never has.

Did you mean the Department of Defense? Department of the Army?
Department of the Navy?

Which?

Dan

[Dan Luke[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote:

>
>> It is amazing that so many people just do not understand that all the
>> murderers who go on shooting rampages and kill students and others
>> are
>> doing it for the sole purpose of discrediting the NRA. Call it an
>> asymmetric campaign to expand gun control laws. Virgina Tech was the
>> latest example of the despicable tactic of a student killing others
>> to
>> attack the good name of the NRA. Shame on the parents of the dead
>> for
>> falling for that obvious trick.
>> After all, we have all seen the actions of the detainees at
>> Guantanamo. They kill and injure themselves just to discredit the
>> US,
>> no other reason than that.
>> [WJ20K]
>>
>
> Found this elsewhere. thought some of the gun nuts might find a use for it.

Is it parody or is it sincerity?

When it comes to gun nuttery, the two are indistinguishable.


--
Dan
T-182T at BFM

[Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]]

"Dan Luke" > wrote in
:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote:
>
>>
>>> It is amazing that so many people just do not understand that all
>>> the murderers who go on shooting rampages and kill students and
>>> others are
>>> doing it for the sole purpose of discrediting the NRA. Call it an
>>> asymmetric campaign to expand gun control laws. Virgina Tech was
>>> the latest example of the despicable tactic of a student killing
>>> others to
>>> attack the good name of the NRA. Shame on the parents of the dead
>>> for
>>> falling for that obvious trick.
>>> After all, we have all seen the actions of the detainees at
>>> Guantanamo. They kill and injure themselves just to discredit the
>>> US,
>>> no other reason than that.
>>> [WJ20K]
>>>
>>
>> Found this elsewhere. thought some of the gun nuts might find a use
>> for it.
>
> Is it parody or is it sincerity?
>
> When it comes to gun nuttery, the two are indistinguishable.
>
>

Thenkew. My point exactly.

This poast makes as much sense as the assertation that the murder I
spoke of before would just as easily happened with a hammer.

This is how that murder happened. Fjukkwit Guy A and girl at party.
Fjukkwit guy B, a very young cop trainee, comes around to warn of
fjukkwit guy A, who had been 'away' for 3-6 months to stay away from
girl. Fjukkwit guy A is a bit scary so fjukkwit guy B had brought his
gun. Fjukkwit guy A tells fjukkwit guy B to fjukk off. Much screaming
ensues. Fjukkwit guy A and girl jump in her car to go home with Fjukkwit
guy B screaming like a girl at them and as the pull away, he shoots and
hits girl in the head.

Could have happened with anything. A hammer, some celery....


Celery doesn;t kill people , people do.

Bertie

[C J Campbell[_1_]]

On 2008-01-19 07:11:02 -0800, Bertie the Bunyip > said:

>
> Celery doesn;t kill people , people do.
>
> Bertie

You don't understand, Bertie. Death by celery is a horrible way to go...
--
Waddling Eagle
World Famous Flight Instructor

[C J Campbell[_1_]]

On 2008-01-19 07:11:02 -0800, Bertie the Bunyip > said:

>
> Celery doesn;t kill people , people do.

I thought all those anti-stalking laws were supposed to prevent that.



<Running away as fast as I can>
--
Waddling Eagle
World Famous Flight Instructor

[Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]]

C J Campbell > wrote in
news:2008011908561043658-christophercampbell@hotmailcom:

> On 2008-01-19 07:11:02 -0800, Bertie the Bunyip > said:
>
>>
>> Celery doesn;t kill people , people do.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> You don't understand, Bertie. Death by celery is a horrible way to go...

It'd probalby take years, for starters!

Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]]

C J Campbell > wrote in
news:200801190857488930-christophercampbell@hotmailcom:

> On 2008-01-19 07:11:02 -0800, Bertie the Bunyip > said:
>
>>
>> Celery doesn;t kill people , people do.
>
> I thought all those anti-stalking laws were supposed to prevent that.


Aaargh ! Another one!

Bertie

[Dan Luke[_2_]]

"C J Campbell" wrote:

>>
>> Celery doesn;t kill people , people do.
>
> I thought all those anti-stalking laws were supposed to prevent that.
>
>

Haw!

Good one.

--
Dan
T-182T at BFM

[Roy Smith]

In article <200801190857488930-christophercampbell@hotmailcom>,
C J Campbell > wrote:

> On 2008-01-19 07:11:02 -0800, Bertie the Bunyip > said:
>
> >
> > Celery doesn;t kill people , people do.
>
> I thought all those anti-stalking laws were supposed to prevent that.

I don't have the heart to tell you what I think of that.

[[email protected]]

On Jan 19, 12:51 pm, " > wrote:
> On Jan 19, 6:17 am, wrote:
>
>
>
> > It proves how stupid the US military is to make comments that they
> > think are logical but are only idiocy.
> > [WJ20K]
>
> The "US Military" makes no statements and never has.

Then you must be living on another planet.
Check out the comment made by the military guy at Guantanamo about the
detainees who killed themselves. Was he a private person there? Of
course not, he was with the US military.
[WJ20K]



>
> Did you mean the Department of Defense? Department of the Army?
> Department of the Navy?
>
> Which?
>
> Dan

[[email protected]]

On Jan 19, 2:51 pm, "Dan Luke" > wrote:
> "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >> It is amazing that so many people just do not understand that all the
> >> murderers who go on shooting rampages and kill students and others
> >> are
> >> doing it for the sole purpose of discrediting the NRA. Call it an
> >> asymmetric campaign to expand gun control laws. Virgina Tech was the
> >> latest example of the despicable tactic of a student killing others
> >> to
> >> attack the good name of the NRA. Shame on the parents of the dead
> >> for
> >> falling for that obvious trick.
> >> After all, we have all seen the actions of the detainees at
> >> Guantanamo. They kill and injure themselves just to discredit the
> >> US,
> >> no other reason than that.
> >> [WJ20K]
>
> > Found this elsewhere. thought some of the gun nuts might find a use for it.
>
> Is it parody or is it sincerity?
>
> When it comes to gun nuttery, the two are indistinguishable.

You are absolutely right! :-)
[WJ20K]



>
> --
> Dan
> T-182T at BFM

[[email protected]]

On Jan 19, 6:15 pm, wrote:
> On Jan 19, 12:51 pm, " > wrote:
>
> > On Jan 19, 6:17 am, wrote:
>
> > > It proves how stupid the US military is to make comments that they
> > > think are logical but are only idiocy.
> > > [WJ20K]
>
> > The "US Military" makes no statements and never has.
>
> Then you must be living on another planet.
> Check out the comment made by the military guy at Guantanamo about the
> detainees who killed themselves. Was he a private person there? Of
> course not, he was with the US military.
> [WJ20K]
>
>
>
> > Did you mean the Department of Defense? Department of the Army?
> > Department of the Navy?
>
> > Which?
>
> > Dan

I wore the uniform for 21 years and not one said "US Military."

Get specific or continue to expose your ignorance.

Dan

[Bertie the Bunyip[_22_]]

" > wrote in news:8685999a-87d9-4d2e-
:



> I wore the uniform for 21 years and not one said "US Military."
>


Maybe you need a better tailor!

Bertie

[[email protected]]

On Jan 19, 6:31 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> " > wrote in news:8685999a-87d9-4d2e-
> :
>
> > I wore the uniform for 21 years and not one said "US Military."
>
> Maybe you need a better tailor!
>
> Bertie

My last name and (depending on when) US Army or US Air Force, plus
various quals and rank.

Nary a "US Military" among the lot.

We're not combined, as are the Canadian Forces.

Dan

[Bertie the Bunyip[_22_]]

" > wrote in
:

> On Jan 19, 6:31 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> " > wrote in
>> news:8685999a-87d9-4d2e-
>> :
>>
>> > I wore the uniform for 21 years and not one said "US Military."
>>
>> Maybe you need a better tailor!
>>
>> Bertie
>
> My last name and (depending on when) US Army or US Air Force, plus
> various quals and rank.
>
> Nary a "US Military" among the lot.
>
> We're not combined, as are the Canadian Forces.


It was a joke dan!


Read it over.


Bertie

[[email protected]]

On Jan 19, 6:42 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> " > wrote :
>
>
>
> > On Jan 19, 6:31 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> " > wrote in
> >> news:8685999a-87d9-4d2e-
> >> :
>
> >> > I wore the uniform for 21 years and not one said "US Military."
>
> >> Maybe you need a better tailor!
>
> >> Bertie
>
> > My last name and (depending on when) US Army or US Air Force, plus
> > various quals and rank.
>
> > Nary a "US Military" among the lot.
>
> > We're not combined, as are the Canadian Forces.
>
> It was a joke dan!
>
> Read it over.
>
> Bertie

Sorry, my sensitivity meter gets pegged when morons talk about the
failures of the "US Military."

That's hippy code for "We hate it."

But tailoring? Of unforms? Have you seen BDUs???

We Army pukes always envied the Marines' better tailors and PR
department.

Dan

[Bertie the Bunyip[_22_]]

" > wrote in
:

> On Jan 19, 6:42 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> " > wrote
>> innews:9c8d9694-e71b-427d-98d1-

>> om:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Jan 19, 6:31 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> " > wrote in
>> >> news:8685999a-87d9-4d2e-
>> >> :
>>
>> >> > I wore the uniform for 21 years and not one said "US Military."
>>
>> >> Maybe you need a better tailor!
>>
>> >> Bertie
>>
>> > My last name and (depending on when) US Army or US Air Force, plus
>> > various quals and rank.
>>
>> > Nary a "US Military" among the lot.
>>
>> > We're not combined, as are the Canadian Forces.
>>
>> It was a joke dan!
>>
>> Read it over.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Sorry, my sensitivity meter gets pegged when morons talk about the
> failures of the "US Military."
>
> That's hippy code for "We hate it."
>

I don't hate it. I don't like some of the morons that use it...


> But tailoring? Of unforms? Have you seen BDUs???
>
> We Army pukes always envied the Marines' better tailors and PR
> department.
>


Let me run you through this Dan!

You said your uniform did not "say" US military.

I suggested a better tailor!


Come on.....


Bertie

[[email protected]]

On Jan 19, 8:01 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>
> Let me run you through this Dan!
>
> You said your uniform did not "say" US military.
>
> I suggested a better tailor!
>
> Come on.....
>
> Bertie

Gotchya

Dan <-- slow today

[[email protected]]

On Jan 19, 11:19 pm, " > wrote:
> On Jan 19, 6:15 pm, wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 19, 12:51 pm, " > wrote:
>
> > > On Jan 19, 6:17 am, wrote:
>
> > > > It proves how stupid the US military is to make comments that they
> > > > think are logical but are only idiocy.
> > > > [WJ20K]
>
> > > The "US Military" makes no statements and never has.
>
> > Then you must be living on another planet.
> > Check out the comment made by the military guy at Guantanamo about the
> > detainees who killed themselves. Was he a private person there? Of
> > course not, he was with the US military.
> > [WJ20K]
>
> > > Did you mean the Department of Defense? Department of the Army?
> > > Department of the Navy?
>
> > > Which?
>
> > > Dan
>
> I wore the uniform for 21 years and not one said "US Military."
>
> Get specific or continue to expose your ignorance.
>
> Dan

It is hilarious to see you go off and nit pick to avoid the
embarrassment of having to admit to the idiocy of one of your
colleague in the military, it is totally irrelevant which subsection
of the US military he is from. He represents the military and made an
idiotic comment as I showed by example of the NRA. One hears enough
about the rivalry between the different forces in the US military but
who cares, it is irrelevant except for the people in it. But you can
continue to live in a state of denial, that is your prerogative.
[WJ20K]

[Rob Arndt[_6_]]

wrote in news:f7a3896e-4b57-427b-82b5-
:

> On Jan 19, 11:19 pm, " > wrote:
>> On Jan 19, 6:15 pm, wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Jan 19, 12:51 pm, " > wrote:
>>
>> > > On Jan 19, 6:17 am, wrote:
>>
>> > > > It proves how stupid the US military is to make comments that
they
>> > > > think are logical but are only idiocy.
>> > > > [WJ20K]
>>
>> > > The "US Military" makes no statements and never has.
>>
>> > Then you must be living on another planet.
>> > Check out the comment made by the military guy at Guantanamo about
the
>> > detainees who killed themselves. Was he a private person there?
Of
>> > course not, he was with the US military.
>> > [WJ20K]
>>
>> > > Did you mean the Department of Defense? Department of the Army?
>> > > Department of the Navy?
>>
>> > > Which?
>>
>> > > Dan
>>
>> I wore the uniform for 21 years and not one said "US Military."
>>
>> Get specific or continue to expose your ignorance.
>>
>> Dan
>
> It is hilarious to see you go off and nit pick to avoid the
> embarrassment of having to admit to the idiocy of one of your
> colleague in the military, it is totally irrelevant which subsection
> of the US military he is from. He represents the military and made an
> idiotic comment as I showed by example of the NRA. One hears enough
> about the rivalry between the different forces in the US military but
> who cares, it is irrelevant except for the people in it. But you can
> continue to live in a state of denial, that is your prerogative.
> [WJ20K]
>

<hide quoted text>

[[email protected]]

On Jan 20, 5:17 am, wrote:
>
> It is hilarious to see you go off and nit pick to avoid the
> embarrassment of having to admit to the idiocy of one of your
> colleague in the military, it is totally irrelevant which subsection
> of the US military he is from. He represents the military and made an
> idiotic comment as I showed by example of the NRA. One hears enough
> about the rivalry between the different forces in the US military but
> who cares, it is irrelevant except for the people in it. But you can
> continue to live in a state of denial, that is your prerogative.
> [WJ20K]

The subsections are the United States Air Force and the United States
Army.

Thank God for them

And for the NRA.

Now I gotta go clean my semi-automatic, 13 round, .40 caliber semi-
automatic handgun after a fun afternoon of shooting up some FBI
targets. I may have to spend money on some more ammo and cleaning
supplies for a final season cleaning of my rifle and shotgun after
hunting hunting bear and deer and pheasant, doves, rabbits, grouse,
and squirrels. Better go practice a few shots with the longbow today.

After church today I'll look up National Review online to see which
Republican candidate is ahead. After watching football I'll switch
over the Ted Nugent's hunting show for a few hunting tips and a few
laughs.

I almost forgot I gotta wash my gas guzzling, CO2 emitting four wheel
drive F-150 today so everyone can see my "Global Warming works for
me!" bumper sticker.

Otherwise, I'm with ya, brother. Damn military.

Dan

[C J Campbell[_1_]]

On 2008-01-19 13:40:35 -0800, Roy Smith > said:

> In article <200801190857488930-christophercampbell@hotmailcom>,
> C J Campbell > wrote:
>
>> On 2008-01-19 07:11:02 -0800, Bertie the Bunyip > said:
>>
>>>
>>> Celery doesn;t kill people , people do.
>>
>> I thought all those anti-stalking laws were supposed to prevent that.
>
> I don't have the heart to tell you what I think of that.

It was not my intent to cause a rhubarb.
--
Waddling Eagle
World Famous Flight Instructor

[§ñühw¤£f[_2_]]

On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:38:38 +0000 (UTC)
Bertie the Bunyip > wasted precious bandwith with:

> Gary L. Burnore > wrote in
> :
>
> > On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:33:22 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
> > > wrote:
> >
> >>Rob Arndt > wrote in
>
> >ps.com:>
> >>> Do get a real job, double L.
> >>>
> >>> Rob
> >>>
> >>
> >>Got one.
> >
> > "real job" and "get a life" posts always make me laugh.
>
> Oh this guy seems to have found a website full of lames and is
> going through them one at a time.
>
"Nice posting frenzy"
:)

--
http://www.smirkingchimp.com

[Bertie the Bunyip[_22_]]

gregvk > wrote in news:Xns9A2B6CC9AD20FA5G2M61033T4QCY@
204.153.245.22:

> Gary L. Burnore > wrote in news:fmvpla$5m2$2
> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
>> On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:33:22 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Rob Arndt > wrote in news:59b47d43-773c-4b64-aa1e-
:
>>>
>>>> Do get a real job, double L.
>>>>
>>>> Rob
>>>>
>>>
>>>Got one.
>>
>> "real job" and "get a life" posts always make me laugh.
>
> Says the weirdo whose "job" apparently involves hanging out at the UPS
> Store and following old men around.
>

Sounds like a good one for you Robbie.

Bertie