Re: Heathrow = Thrust Reversers deployed

[Eeyore[_2_]]

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

> Eeyore > wrote
> >
> > The problem with Air Canada was partly due to
> > unfamiliarity with the use of mixed imperial and metric measure. Plus
> > an aircraft flying with inoperative equipment. Not an issue here.
>
> Nope.

I can't wait to hear what 'nope' there is about the above. Inquiring minds
need to know.

Are you saying that the FQIS in the Gimli Glider WAS properly operative ?

Graham

[Eeyore[_2_]]

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

> Eeyore > wrote
> >
> > Are you saying that the FQIS in the Gimli Glider WAS properly
> > operative ?
>
> Nope,

So you're AGREEING with me.

Graham

[Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]]

Eeyore > wrote in
:

>
>
> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>
>> Eeyore > wrote
>> >
>> > Are you saying that the FQIS in the Gimli Glider WAS properly
>> > operative ?
>>
>> Nope,
>
> So you're AGREEING with me.
>
> Graham
>
>

Nope

Bertie

[Ron Garret]

In article >,
Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:

> Eeyore > wrote in
> :
>
> >
> >
> > Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
> >
> >> Eeyore > wrote
> >> >
> >> > Are you saying that the FQIS in the Gimli Glider WAS properly
> >> > operative ?
> >>
> >> Nope,
> >
> > So you're AGREEING with me.
> >
> > Graham
> >
> >
>
> Nope

Graham,

You have to realize that Bertie is not a real person. He's actually a
'bot that automatically replies with "nope" to every post on any
aviation-related newsgroup.

rg

[Eeyore[_2_]]

Ron Garret wrote:

> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > Eeyore > wrote in
> > > Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
> > >> Eeyore > wrote
> > >> >
> > >> > Are you saying that the FQIS in the Gimli Glider WAS properly
> > >> > operative ?
> > >>
> > >> Nope,
> > >
> > > So you're AGREEING with me.
> > >
> > > Graham
> > >
> >
> > Nope
>
> Graham,
>
> You have to realize that Bertie is not a real person. He's actually a
> 'bot that automatically replies with "nope" to every post on any
> aviation-related newsgroup.

Fear not. I'm very familiar with Bertie.

We actually used to get on OK until he found out I'd been getting members
of "the meow" TOSsed by their ISPs or news providers because they'd been
disrupting other groups where I posted. They are trolling friends of his,
or more accurately WERE since they subsequently seem to have died a death
thankfully.

Bertie's reactions to me subsequently are merely spiteful bile.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meow_Wars

Graham

[Allen Prunty]

Eeyore wrote:

> We actually used to get on OK until he found out I'd been getting members
> of "the meow" TOSsed by their ISPs or news providers because they'd been
> disrupting other groups where I posted. They are trolling friends of his,
> or more accurately WERE since they subsequently seem to have died a death
> thankfully.
>
> Bertie's reactions to me subsequently are merely spiteful bile.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meow_Wars
>
> Graham

Grahm,

What about Bertie's posting on the hydrolics that made sense? I don't
believe he's a BOT.

Allen

[Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]]

Ron Garret > wrote in news:rNOSPAMon-
:

> In article >,
> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>
>> Eeyore > wrote in
>> :
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>> >
>> >> Eeyore > wrote
>> >> >
>> >> > Are you saying that the FQIS in the Gimli Glider WAS properly
>> >> > operative ?
>> >>
>> >> Nope,
>> >
>> > So you're AGREEING with me.
>> >
>> > Graham
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Nope
>
> Graham,
>
> You have to realize that Bertie is not a real person. He's actually a
> 'bot that automatically replies with "nope" to every post on any
> aviation-related newsgroup.
>
> rg

Nope


Bertie
>

[Eeyore[_2_]]

Allen Prunty wrote:

> Eeyore wrote:
>
> > We actually used to get on OK until he found out I'd been getting members
> > of "the meow" TOSsed by their ISPs or news providers because they'd been
> > disrupting other groups where I posted. They are trolling friends of his,
> > or more accurately WERE since they subsequently seem to have died a death
> > thankfully.
> >
> > Bertie's reactions to me subsequently are merely spiteful bile.
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meow_Wars
> >
> > Graham
>
> Grahm,
>
> What about Bertie's posting on the hydrolics that made sense? I don't
> believe he's a BOT.
>
> Allen

No he's not a BOT at all. I think that idea was a joke on Ron's part. At times
he might as well be one.

Graham

[Eeyore[_2_]]

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

> Eeyore > wrote
> >
> > Bertie's reactions to me subsequently are merely spiteful bile.
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meow_Wars
>
> Bwawhahwhahwhahwhahw!
>
> You can't stop the meow army, fjukkwit.

Fluffy's DEAD you MORON.

Graham

[Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]]

Eeyore > wrote in
:

>
>
> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>
>> Eeyore > wrote
>> >
>> > Bertie's reactions to me subsequently are merely spiteful bile.
>> >
>> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meow_Wars
>>
>> Bwawhahwhahwhahwhahw!
>>
>> You can't stop the meow army, fjukkwit.
>
> Fluffy's DEAD you MORON.

No, he isn't MEOW!!! lives.


Bertie

[george]

On Jan 19, 10:39 pm, Allen Prunty > wrote:

> What about Bertie's posting on the hydrolics that made sense? I don't
> believe he's a BOT.
>
He's not a bot.
From my knowledge and experience he knows what he's posting about and
doesn't suffer fools in any way or manner.

The best advice you can get now is wait for the Accident report

[Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]]

George > wrote in news:1f81563f-c98b-49a4-9a7e-ec7f9813e079
@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com:

> On Jan 19, 10:39 pm, Allen Prunty > wrote:
>
>> What about Bertie's posting on the hydrolics that made sense? I don't
>> believe he's a BOT.
>>
> He's not a bot.
> From my knowledge and experience he knows what he's posting about and
> doesn't suffer fools in any way or manner.
>
> The best advice you can get now is wait for the Accident report
>

Oh Eeyore is already here.

Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]]

Clark > wrote in
:

> George > wrote in
> news:1f81563f-c98b-49a4-9a7e-ec7f9813e079
> @s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com:
>
>> On Jan 19, 10:39 pm, Allen Prunty > wrote:
>>
>>> What about Bertie's posting on the hydrolics that made sense? I
>>> don't believe he's a BOT.
>>>
>> He's not a bot.
>> From my knowledge and experience he knows what he's posting about and
>> doesn't suffer fools in any way or manner.
>>
> Except the fool that types on Bertie's keyboard...
>
>

Wasn't given a choice there. We have a treaty.


Bertie

[Eeyore[_2_]]

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

> Clark > wrote
> > George > wrote
> >> Allen Prunty > wrote:
> >>
> >>> What about Bertie's posting on the hydrolics that made sense? I
> >>> don't believe he's a BOT.
> >>>
> >> He's not a bot.
> >> From my knowledge and experience he knows what he's posting about and
> >> doesn't suffer fools in any way or manner.
> >>
> > Except the fool that types on Bertie's keyboard...
>
> Wasn't given a choice there. We have a treaty

alt.usenet kooks removed.

Graham

[Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]]

Eeyore > wrote in
:

>
>
> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>
>> Clark > wrote
>> > George > wrote
>> >> Allen Prunty > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> What about Bertie's posting on the hydrolics that made sense? I
>> >>> don't believe he's a BOT.
>> >>>
>> >> He's not a bot.
>> >> From my knowledge and experience he knows what he's posting about and
>> >> doesn't suffer fools in any way or manner.
>> >>
>> > Except the fool that types on Bertie's keyboard...
>>
>> Wasn't given a choice there. We have a treaty
>
> alt.usenet kooks removed.
>
> Graham
>
>

Waht a fjukkwit you are,. this never ends well for you wannabe boi.


Bertie

[Eeyore[_5_]]

Eeyore > wrote in
:

>
>
> Allen Prunty wrote:
>
>> Eeyore wrote:
>>
>> > We actually used to get on OK until he found out I'd been getting
>> > members of "the meow" TOSsed by their ISPs or news providers
>> > because they'd been disrupting other groups where I posted. They
>> > are trolling friends of his, or more accurately WERE since they
>> > subsequently seem to have died a death thankfully.
>> >
>> > Bertie's reactions to me subsequently are merely spiteful bile.
>> >
>> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meow_Wars
>> >
>> > Graham
>>
>> Grahm,
>>
>> What about Bertie's posting on the hydrolics that made sense? I
>> don't believe he's a BOT.
>>
>> Allen
>
> No he's not a BOT at all. I think that idea was a joke on Ron's part.
> At times he might as well be one.


Wheras I AM a bot!


Graham

[Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]]

Eeyore > wrote in
:

>
>
> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>
>> Eeyore > wrote
>> >
>> > The problem with Air Canada was partly due to
>> > unfamiliarity with the use of mixed imperial and metric measure.
>> > Plus an aircraft flying with inoperative equipment. Not an issue
>> > here.
>>
>> Nope.
>
> I can't wait to hear what 'nope' there is about the above. Inquiring
> minds need to know.
>
> Are you saying that the FQIS in the Gimli Glider WAS properly
> operative ?
>
> Graham

Nope.


Bertie