Bertie the Bunyip[_22_]
January 20th 08, 01:31 AM
Eeyore > wrote in
:
>
>
> john bates wrote:
>
>> The fact that some experienced people all mentioned the nose high
>> attitude before a stall (Which was the case due to the very short
>> distance it travelled on the grass)
>
> If it had truly STALLED there would have been a far nastier mess. The
> pilot was just 'stetching' the glide.
>
>
>> why did it do this if under perfect control? This to
>> me implies that it was not just the engines.
>
> The engines didn't fail. There's clear evidence at least one was
> turning when it landed. They 'failed' to respond to a call for power.
> That's where the 'failure' is and it looks likely to be electronic to
> me (or some bizarre fuel quality related issue).
>
Nope
Bertie
:
>
>
> john bates wrote:
>
>> The fact that some experienced people all mentioned the nose high
>> attitude before a stall (Which was the case due to the very short
>> distance it travelled on the grass)
>
> If it had truly STALLED there would have been a far nastier mess. The
> pilot was just 'stetching' the glide.
>
>
>> why did it do this if under perfect control? This to
>> me implies that it was not just the engines.
>
> The engines didn't fail. There's clear evidence at least one was
> turning when it landed. They 'failed' to respond to a call for power.
> That's where the 'failure' is and it looks likely to be electronic to
> me (or some bizarre fuel quality related issue).
>
Nope
Bertie