Twin Cub and twin Mustang

[William Hung[_2_]]

Anyone have anything thoughts on these that they'd like to share?

Wil

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

William Hung > wrote in news:bb5a57ac-5afb-4602-8405-
:

> Anyone have anything thoughts on these that they'd like to share?
>
> Wil
>

Well, the lightplane twins were just for fun. They would have had massive
problems with performance and stucture.

The Twin Mustang had, once again, ben pipped at the post and posibly
inxpired by the Germans who did a zwilling" ME 109 as well as an HE 1-11 (
with a fifth engine added in between)


Bertie

[William Hung[_2_]]

On Feb 9, 2:43*pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> William Hung > wrote in news:bb5a57ac-5afb-4602-8405-
> :
>
> > Anyone have anything thoughts on these that they'd like to share?
>
> > Wil
>
> Well, the lightplane twins were just for fun. They would have had massive
> problems with performance and stucture.
>
> The Twin Mustang had, once again, ben pipped at the post and posibly
> inxpired by the Germans who did a zwilling" ME 109 as well as an HE 1-11 (
> with a fifth engine added in between)
>
> Bertie

I'll have to look into that.

Here are some pics of the T-Cub and T-Stang.

http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/shared/media/photodb/photos/050317-F...

http://www.nurflugel.com/Nurflugel/n_o_d/images/airplanes/cub_twin.jpg

Wil

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

William Hung > wrote in
:

> On Feb 9, 2:43*pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> William Hung > wrote in
>> news:bb5a57ac-5afb-4602-8405-
>> :
>>
>> > Anyone have anything thoughts on these that they'd like to share?
>>
>> > Wil
>>
>> Well, the lightplane twins were just for fun. They would have had
>> massive problems with performance and stucture.
>>
>> The Twin Mustang had, once again, ben pipped at the post and posibly
>> inxpired by the Germans who did a zwilling" ME 109 as well as an HE
>> 1-11 (
>
>> with a fifth engine added in between)
>>
>> Bertie
>
> I'll have to look into that.
>
> Here are some pics of the T-Cub and T-Stang.
>
> http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/shared/media/photodb/photos/050317-
F..
> .
>
> http://www.nurflugel.com/Nurflugel/n_o_d/images/airplanes/cub_twin.jpg
>
> Wil
>

Yeah, the cub was at a lot of airshows years ago. I saw it a couple of
times. Same guy, i think, did a twin Tri-pacer with a single fuselage
but two engines mounted side by side on the nose swinging overlapping
props.
Someone did a twin Ercoupe back in the fifties and did an aerobatic
airshow routine wiht it for years.
I saw some pics of it performing on the net some time ago..



Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in news:Xns9A3FD07A62248****upropeeh@
207.14.116.130:

>>
>> http://www.nurflugel.com/Nurflugel/n_o_d/images/airplanes/cub_twin.jpg
>>
>> Wil
>>
>
> Yeah, the cub was at a lot of airshows years ago. I saw it a couple of
> times. Same guy, i think, did a twin Tri-pacer with a single fuselage
> but two engines mounted side by side on the nose swinging overlapping
> props.


Doh! It;'s in the background.


Bertie

[William Hung[_2_]]

On Feb 9, 3:38*pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in news:Xns9A3FD07A62248****upropeeh@
> 207.14.116.130:
>
>
>
> >>http://www.nurflugel.com/Nurflugel/n_o_d/images/airplanes/cub_twin.jpg
>
> >> Wil
>
> > Yeah, the cub was at a lot of airshows years ago. I saw it a couple of
> > times. Same guy, i think, did a twin Tri-pacer with a single fuselage
> > but two engines mounted side by side on the nose swinging overlapping
> > props.
>
> Doh! It;'s in the background.
>
> Bertie

Yeah, Bertie, it's behind the T-Cub. lol.


Years ago I read about the T-Tri-Pacer. Very interesting stuff
indeed. It was a cheaper twin to get than just buying a regular
twin. I wonder if the FAA would recognize twin time if you flew
them. I suppose they'll have to.

Wil

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

William Hung > wrote in
:

> On Feb 9, 3:38*pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in
>> news:Xns9A3FD07A62248****upropeeh
> @
>> 207.14.116.130:
>>
>>
>>
>> >>
http://www.nurflugel.com/Nurflugel/n_o_d/images/airplanes/cub_twin.j
>> >>pg
>>
>> >> Wil
>>
>> > Yeah, the cub was at a lot of airshows years ago. I saw it a couple
>> > of times. Same guy, i think, did a twin Tri-pacer with a single
>> > fuselage but two engines mounted side by side on the nose swinging
>> > overlapping props.
>>
>> Doh! It;'s in the background.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Yeah, Bertie, it's behind the T-Cub. lol.
>
>
> Years ago I read about the T-Tri-Pacer. Very interesting stuff
> indeed. It was a cheaper twin to get than just buying a regular
> twin. I wonder if the FAA would recognize twin time if you flew
> them. I suppose they'll have to.



Yeah, I'm sure they would. That cub must have been a mess, though. It's
nearly twice as heavy as a stock cub with half he wing area!

Bertie

[buttman]

On Feb 9, 1:49 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> William Hung > wrote :
>
> > On Feb 9, 3:38 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in
> >> news:Xns9A3FD07A62248****upropeeh
> > @
> >> 207.14.116.130:
>
> http://www.nurflugel.com/Nurflugel/n_o_d/images/airplanes/cub_twin.j
>
>
>
> >> >>pg
>
> >> >> Wil
>
> >> > Yeah, the cub was at a lot of airshows years ago. I saw it a couple
> >> > of times. Same guy, i think, did a twin Tri-pacer with a single
> >> > fuselage but two engines mounted side by side on the nose swinging
> >> > overlapping props.
>
> >> Doh! It;'s in the background.
>
> >> Bertie
>
> > Yeah, Bertie, it's behind the T-Cub. lol.
>
> > Years ago I read about the T-Tri-Pacer. Very interesting stuff
> > indeed. It was a cheaper twin to get than just buying a regular
> > twin. I wonder if the FAA would recognize twin time if you flew
> > them. I suppose they'll have to.
>
> Yeah, I'm sure they would. That cub must have been a mess, though. It's
> nearly twice as heavy as a stock cub with half he wing area!
>
> Bertie

Nope.

How would you know, you've never flown it, k00ky boi.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

buttman > wrote in
:

> On Feb 9, 1:49 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> William Hung > wrote
>> innews:7586115a-c944-49f2-939c-4c18c489e0a8
@l32g2000hse.googlegroups.c
>> om:
>>
>> > On Feb 9, 3:38 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in
>> >> news:Xns9A3FD07A62248****upropeeh
>> > @
>> >> 207.14.116.130:
>>
>> http://www.nurflugel.com/Nurflugel/n_o_d/images/airplanes/cub_twin.j
>>
>>
>>
>> >> >>pg
>>
>> >> >> Wil
>>
>> >> > Yeah, the cub was at a lot of airshows years ago. I saw it a
>> >> > couple of times. Same guy, i think, did a twin Tri-pacer with a
>> >> > single fuselage but two engines mounted side by side on the nose
>> >> > swinging overlapping props.
>>
>> >> Doh! It;'s in the background.
>>
>> >> Bertie
>>
>> > Yeah, Bertie, it's behind the T-Cub. lol.
>>
>> > Years ago I read about the T-Tri-Pacer. Very interesting stuff
>> > indeed. It was a cheaper twin to get than just buying a regular
>> > twin. I wonder if the FAA would recognize twin time if you flew
>> > them. I suppose they'll have to.
>>
>> Yeah, I'm sure they would. That cub must have been a mess, though.
>> It's nearly twice as heavy as a stock cub with half he wing area!
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Nope.
>
> How would you know, you've never flown it, k00ky boi.

Oh ouch. I really got a taste of my own medicine there, didn't I?


Bertie

[RL Anderson]

Blueskies wrote:
> "William Hung" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Anyone have anything thoughts on these that they'd like to share?
>>
>> Wil
>
> And the DO-28?
>
> http://www.airliners.net/photo/Untitled/Untitled/0928317

Here's a good link to the Twin Stang.

> http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=284

Rick

[buttman]

On Feb 9, 3:08 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> buttman > wrote :
>
> > On Feb 9, 1:49 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> William Hung > wrote
> >> innews:7586115a-c944-49f2-939c-4c18c489e0a8
>
> @l32g2000hse.googlegroups.c
>
>
>
> >> om:
>
> >> > On Feb 9, 3:38 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in
> >> >> news:Xns9A3FD07A62248****upropeeh
> >> > @
> >> >> 207.14.116.130:
>
> >>http://www.nurflugel.com/Nurflugel/n_o_d/images/airplanes/cub_twin.j
>
> >> >> >>pg
>
> >> >> >> Wil
>
> >> >> > Yeah, the cub was at a lot of airshows years ago. I saw it a
> >> >> > couple of times. Same guy, i think, did a twin Tri-pacer with a
> >> >> > single fuselage but two engines mounted side by side on the nose
> >> >> > swinging overlapping props.
>
> >> >> Doh! It;'s in the background.
>
> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> > Yeah, Bertie, it's behind the T-Cub. lol.
>
> >> > Years ago I read about the T-Tri-Pacer. Very interesting stuff
> >> > indeed. It was a cheaper twin to get than just buying a regular
> >> > twin. I wonder if the FAA would recognize twin time if you flew
> >> > them. I suppose they'll have to.
>
> >> Yeah, I'm sure they would. That cub must have been a mess, though.
> >> It's nearly twice as heavy as a stock cub with half he wing area!
>
> >> Bertie
>
> > Nope.
>
> > How would you know, you've never flown it, k00ky boi.
>
> Oh ouch. I really got a taste of my own medicine there, didn't I?
>
> Bertie

how did I know you were going to reply to that within 5 minutes...

You know, ol bertie boy, it was a nice day today. You should go
outside once and a while. I mean this seriously, obsessing over an
internet discussion group is unhealthy.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

buttman > wrote in
:

> On Feb 9, 3:08 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> buttman > wrote
>> innews:76a58258-af00-47e0-8f6f-

>> om:
>>
>> > On Feb 9, 1:49 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> William Hung > wrote
>> >> innews:7586115a-c944-49f2-939c-4c18c489e0a8
>>
>> @l32g2000hse.googlegroups.c
>>
>>
>>
>> >> om:
>>
>> >> > On Feb 9, 3:38 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> >> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in
>> >> >> news:Xns9A3FD07A62248****upropeeh
>> >> > @
>> >> >> 207.14.116.130:
>>
>> >>
http://www.nurflugel.com/Nurflugel/n_o_d/images/airplanes/cub_twin.j
>>
>> >> >> >>pg
>>
>> >> >> >> Wil
>>
>> >> >> > Yeah, the cub was at a lot of airshows years ago. I saw it a
>> >> >> > couple of times. Same guy, i think, did a twin Tri-pacer with
>> >> >> > a single fuselage but two engines mounted side by side on the
>> >> >> > nose swinging overlapping props.
>>
>> >> >> Doh! It;'s in the background.
>>
>> >> >> Bertie
>>
>> >> > Yeah, Bertie, it's behind the T-Cub. lol.
>>
>> >> > Years ago I read about the T-Tri-Pacer. Very interesting stuff
>> >> > indeed. It was a cheaper twin to get than just buying a regular
>> >> > twin. I wonder if the FAA would recognize twin time if you flew
>> >> > them. I suppose they'll have to.
>>
>> >> Yeah, I'm sure they would. That cub must have been a mess, though.
>> >> It's nearly twice as heavy as a stock cub with half he wing area!
>>
>> >> Bertie
>>
>> > Nope.
>>
>> > How would you know, you've never flown it, k00ky boi.
>>
>> Oh ouch. I really got a taste of my own medicine there, didn't I?
>>
>> Bertie
>
> how did I know you were going to reply to that within 5 minutes...
>
> You know, ol bertie boy, it was a nice day today. You should go
> outside once and a while. I mean this seriously, obsessing over an
> internet discussion group is unhealthy.


I was outside.

In fact, I flew... And got paid for it!

Bertie
>

[buttman]

On Feb 10, 7:38 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>
> I was outside.
>
> In fact, I flew... And got paid for it!
>
> Bertie


Thats great! Glad to hear it. *pats bertie on the head and gives him a
dog treat*

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

buttman > wrote in news:a219ea49-e97f-488c-9221-
:

> On Feb 10, 7:38 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>>
>> I was outside.
>>
>> In fact, I flew... And got paid for it!
>>
>> Bertie
>
>
> Thats great! Glad to hear it. *pats bertie on the head and gives him a
> dog treat*


Aww, how kewt!


BTW, if you still don'[t believe you're an idiot, you're just about to
prove it to yourself.


Bertie