Gulfstream vs. Cessna

[A Guy Called Tyketto]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


I'll throw this over here too, since it's over at the
LiveATC.net forums.

Gulfstream V's flight track:

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/GLF17/history/20070206/1538Z/KATW/KATW

Cessna's flight track:

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N750CX/history/20080307/1757Z/KICT/KICT

Who had it better, and why? Discuss.

BL.
- --
Brad Littlejohn | Email:
Unix Systems Administrator, |
Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! :) | http://www.wizard.com/~tyketto
PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFH1iOuyBkZmuMZ8L8RAu8yAJsFDBP137rUhwj32e8/IbK3kQfpawCg7pS4
m6SvZiK1iV2WIb365m9O5us=
=JJ8H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[John Clear]

In article >,
A Guy Called Tyketto > wrote:
>
> I'll throw this over here too, since it's over at the
>LiveATC.net forums.
>
> Gulfstream V's flight track:
>
>http://flightaware.com/live/flight/GLF17/history/20070206/1538Z/KATW/KATW
>
> Cessna's flight track:
>
>http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N750CX/history/20080307/1757Z/KICT/KICT
>
> Who had it better, and why? Discuss.

Cessna wins hands down. More precise shaping, and using the MO/IL border
as part of the logo is an added flourish.

John
--
John Clear - http://www.clear-prop.org/

[TacAN]

Both good but I agree that Cessna wins my vote.

A week or two back I heard an Australian reg Gulfstream VH-CCC report
altitude at FL500. Yikes!!

http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.search?regsearch=VH-CCC&distinct_entry=true

Is the Cessna capable of these levels?

Graham

"A Guy Called Tyketto" > wrote in message
et...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> I'll throw this over here too, since it's over at the
> LiveATC.net forums.
>
> Gulfstream V's flight track:
>
> http://flightaware.com/live/flight/GLF17/history/20070206/1538Z/KATW/KATW
>
> Cessna's flight track:
>
> http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N750CX/history/20080307/1757Z/KICT/KICT
>
> Who had it better, and why? Discuss.
>
> BL.
> - --
> Brad Littlejohn | Email:
> Unix Systems Administrator, |
> Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! :) | http://www.wizard.com/~tyketto
> PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFH1iOuyBkZmuMZ8L8RAu8yAJsFDBP137rUhwj32e8/IbK3kQfpawCg7pS4
> m6SvZiK1iV2WIb365m9O5us=
> =JJ8H
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[WingFlaps]

On Mar 11, 7:43*pm, (John Clear) wrote:
> In article >,
> A Guy Called Tyketto > wrote:
>
>
>
> > * *I'll throw this over here too, since it's over at the
> >LiveATC.net forums.
>
> > * *Gulfstream V's flight track:
>
> >http://flightaware.com/live/flight/GLF17/history/20070206/1538Z/KATW/...
>
> > * *Cessna's flight track:
>
> >http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N750CX/history/20080307/1757Z/KICT...
>
> > * *Who had it better, and why? Discuss.
>
> Cessna wins hands down. *More precise shaping, and using the MO/IL border
> as part of the logo is an added flourish.
>
> John
> --
> John Clear - * * * * * * * * * * * * *http://www.clear-prop.org/

Aren't straight lines rather simple with an autopilot and GPS?

Cheers

[Darkwing]

> Who had it better, and why? Discuss.
>
> BL.


Gulfstream got served!