Bad Citation crash

[akjcbkJA]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7321589.stm

[buttman]

On Mar 30, 3:07*pm, "akjcbkJA" > wrote:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7321589.stm

as opposed to a good citation crash?

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

buttman > wrote in news:307cdd99-d139-4118-8be3-
:

> On Mar 30, 3:07*pm, "akjcbkJA" > wrote:
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7321589.stm
>
> as opposed to a good citation crash?
>

What, you planning on crashing one?


Try and take out something of use while your at it. The rest of your gene
pool, for instance. You could crash into the family trailer!

Bertie

[Dylan Smith]

On 2008-03-31, buttman > wrote:
> On Mar 30, 3:07*pm, "akjcbkJA" > wrote:
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7321589.stm
>
> as opposed to a good citation crash?

Yes. A good Citation crash would be one where everyone walked away, even
if the aircraft was totaled.

--
From the sunny Isle of Man.
Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid.

[Steve Foley]

"Dylan Smith" > wrote in message
...
> On 2008-03-31, buttman > wrote:
> > On Mar 30, 3:07 pm, "akjcbkJA" > wrote:
> >> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7321589.stm
> >
> > as opposed to a good citation crash?
>
> Yes. A good Citation crash would be one where everyone walked away, even
> if the aircraft was totaled.
>

Like the one at Bader Field in Atlantic City.

But... If you can walk away, it was a 'good landing'. If you can fly the
plane again, it's a 'great landing', so I guess that wouldn't qualify as a
crash <g>

[Steve Foley]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
> buttman > wrote in news:307cdd99-d139-4118-8be3-
> :
>
> > On Mar 30, 3:07 pm, "akjcbkJA" > wrote:
> >> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7321589.stm
> >
> > as opposed to a good citation crash?
> >
>
> What, you planning on crashing one?
>
>
> Try and take out something of use while your at it.
> You could crash into the family trailer!

WHAT!? And deprive everyone of your witty commentary?

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

"Steve Foley" > wrote in news:vT8Ij.2243
$yd2.2190@trndny04:

> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> .. .
>> buttman > wrote in news:307cdd99-d139-4118-8be3-
>> :
>>
>> > On Mar 30, 3:07 pm, "akjcbkJA" > wrote:
>> >> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7321589.stm
>> >
>> > as opposed to a good citation crash?
>> >
>>
>> What, you planning on crashing one?
>>
>>
>> Try and take out something of use while your at it.
>> You could crash into the family trailer!
>
> WHAT!? And deprive everyone of your witty commentary?
>
>

I meant his family trailer..


Besides,. I've consigned all my wit and wisdom to a 'bot to be posted in
perpetuity.


Bertie

[Max]

"Clark" > wrote in message
...
> "Steve Foley" > wrote in
> news:6S8Ij.1943$ie3.1129
> @trndny02:
>
>> "Dylan Smith" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On 2008-03-31, buttman > wrote:
>>> > On Mar 30, 3:07 pm, "akjcbkJA" > wrote:
>>> >> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7321589.stm
>>> >
>>> > as opposed to a good citation crash?
>>>
>>> Yes. A good Citation crash would be one where everyone walked away, even
>>> if the aircraft was totaled.
>>>
>>
>> Like the one at Bader Field in Atlantic City.
>>
>> But... If you can walk away, it was a 'good landing'. If you can fly the
>> plane again, it's a 'great landing', so I guess that wouldn't qualify as
>> a
>> crash <g>
>>
> But where does riding a boat to shore or swimming away fit into the
> landing
> quality evaluation?
>

Fire prevention. Saves the cost and clean-up of foaming the runway.

[Max]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
> "Steve Foley" > wrote in news:vT8Ij.2243
> $yd2.2190@trndny04:
>
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> .. .
>>> buttman > wrote in news:307cdd99-d139-4118-8be3-
>>> :
>>>
>>> > On Mar 30, 3:07 pm, "akjcbkJA" > wrote:
>>> >> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7321589.stm
>>> >
>>> > as opposed to a good citation crash?
>>> >
>>>
>>> What, you planning on crashing one?
>>>
>>>
>>> Try and take out something of use while your at it.
>>> You could crash into the family trailer!
>>
>> WHAT!? And deprive everyone of your witty commentary?
>>
>>
>
> I meant his family trailer..
>
>
> Besides,. I've consigned all my wit and wisdom to a 'bot to be posted in
> perpetuity.
>
>

I thought they had a 1k minimum for all postings.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

"Max" <luv2^fly^99@cox.^net> wrote in news:n6dIj.51230$097.43146
@newsfe21.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> .. .
>> "Steve Foley" > wrote in news:vT8Ij.2243
>> $yd2.2190@trndny04:
>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> .. .
>>>> buttman > wrote in news:307cdd99-d139-4118-8be3-
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>> > On Mar 30, 3:07 pm, "akjcbkJA" > wrote:
>>>> >> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7321589.stm
>>>> >
>>>> > as opposed to a good citation crash?
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> What, you planning on crashing one?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Try and take out something of use while your at it.
>>>> You could crash into the family trailer!
>>>
>>> WHAT!? And deprive everyone of your witty commentary?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I meant his family trailer..
>>
>>
>> Besides,. I've consigned all my wit and wisdom to a 'bot to be posted
in
>> perpetuity.
>>
>>
>
> I thought they had a 1k minimum for all postings.
>
>
>

You thought wrong,



Bertie

[Tina]

There's a language problem here that might be addressed on the show
"Are you smarter than a fifth grader." If it's a sea plane that
touches down, shouldn't it be called a watering? And if it's a crash
onto a water surface, is it a landing, or does one have to wait until
the airplane is on the bottom to say it's landed?

It's time for my meds: in this case it will be a Bombay Sapphire Gin
Martini, up. It's the only fitting end to a Monday.


On Mar 31, 5:44*pm, "Max" <luv2^fly^99@cox.^net> wrote:
> "Clark" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Steve Foley" > wrote in
> > news:6S8Ij.1943$ie3.1129
> > @trndny02:
>
> >> "Dylan Smith" > wrote in message
> ...
> >>> On 2008-03-31, buttman > wrote:
> >>> > On Mar 30, 3:07 pm, "akjcbkJA" > wrote:
> >>> >>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7321589.stm
>
> >>> > as opposed to a good citation crash?
>
> >>> Yes. A good Citation crash would be one where everyone walked away, even
> >>> if the aircraft was totaled.
>
> >> Like the one at Bader Field in Atlantic City.
>
> >> But... If you can walk away, it was a 'good landing'. If you can fly the
> >> plane again, it's a 'great landing', so I guess that wouldn't qualify as
> >> a
> >> crash <g>
>
> > But where does riding a boat to shore or swimming away fit into the
> > landing
> > quality evaluation?
>
> Fire prevention. Saves the cost and clean-up of foaming the runway.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
> "Max" <luv2^fly^99@cox.^net> wrote in news:n6dIj.51230$097.43146
> @newsfe21.lga:
>
>>
>> I thought they had a 1k minimum for all postings.
>>
>>
>>
>
> You thought wrong,
>
>
>


16

[Maxwell[_2_]]

Sounds like a Monday kind of question, "Cheers" to ya.

"Tina" > wrote in message
...
There's a language problem here that might be addressed on the show
"Are you smarter than a fifth grader." If it's a sea plane that
touches down, shouldn't it be called a watering? And if it's a crash
onto a water surface, is it a landing, or does one have to wait until
the airplane is on the bottom to say it's landed?

It's time for my meds: in this case it will be a Bombay Sapphire Gin
Martini, up. It's the only fitting end to a Monday.


On Mar 31, 5:44 pm, "Max" <luv2^fly^99@cox.^net> wrote:
> "Clark" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Steve Foley" > wrote in
> > news:6S8Ij.1943$ie3.1129
> > @trndny02:
>
> >> "Dylan Smith" > wrote in message
> ...
> >>> On 2008-03-31, buttman > wrote:
> >>> > On Mar 30, 3:07 pm, "akjcbkJA" > wrote:
> >>> >>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7321589.stm
>
> >>> > as opposed to a good citation crash?
>
> >>> Yes. A good Citation crash would be one where everyone walked away,
> >>> even
> >>> if the aircraft was totaled.
>
> >> Like the one at Bader Field in Atlantic City.
>
> >> But... If you can walk away, it was a 'good landing'. If you can fly
> >> the
> >> plane again, it's a 'great landing', so I guess that wouldn't qualify
> >> as
> >> a
> >> crash <g>
>
> > But where does riding a boat to shore or swimming away fit into the
> > landing
> > quality evaluation?
>
> Fire prevention. Saves the cost and clean-up of foaming the runway.- Hide
> quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:yagIj.44101$QC.1114
@newsfe20.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> .. .
>> "Max" <luv2^fly^99@cox.^net> wrote in news:n6dIj.51230$097.43146
>> @newsfe21.lga:
>>
>>>
>>> I thought they had a 1k minimum for all postings.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> You thought wrong,
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> 16
>
>
>

This is the most intelligent post I've seen you make to date.
Well, after that "3" one maybe.

bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:yagIj.44101$QC.1114
> @newsfe20.lga:
>
>>
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> .. .
>>> "Max" <luv2^fly^99@cox.^net> wrote in news:n6dIj.51230$097.43146
>>> @newsfe21.lga:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I thought they had a 1k minimum for all postings.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> You thought wrong,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> 16
>>
>>
>>
>
> This is the most intelligent post I've seen you make to date.
> Well, after that "3" one maybe.
>

17

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:G7iIj.64066$y05.24201
@newsfe22.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> .. .
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:yagIj.44101$QC.1114
>> @newsfe20.lga:
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> .. .
>>>> "Max" <luv2^fly^99@cox.^net> wrote in news:n6dIj.51230$097.43146
>>>> @newsfe21.lga:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I thought they had a 1k minimum for all postings.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You thought wrong,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 16
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> This is the most intelligent post I've seen you make to date.
>> Well, after that "3" one maybe.
>>
>
> 17
>
>
>

Really feelin your oats now I see! Spread those wings, k00kie boi!


Bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:G7iIj.64066$y05.24201
> @newsfe22.lga:
>
>>
>>>
>>
>> 17
>>
>>
>>
>
> Really feelin your oats now I see! Spread those wings, k00kie boi!
>
>


18

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:mHiIj.45511$f8.980
@newsfe23.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:G7iIj.64066$y05.24201
>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> 17
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Really feelin your oats now I see! Spread those wings, k00kie boi!
>>
>>
>
>
> 18
>
>
>

You a usenet master



Bertie

[Dan[_10_]]

On Apr 1, 12:17 am, "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote:

>
> 18

3 more and you'll reach your IQ.

[B A R R Y[_2_]]

Max wrote:
>
>
> Fire prevention. Saves the cost and clean-up of foaming the runway.

Which is probably cheaper than the enviromental cleanup protection and
cleanup in the bay. <G>

[Steve Foley]

Based on this new information, I am officially re-writing the maxim:

Any landing you can walk away from is a good one.
Any watering you can swim away from is a good one.


"Tina" > wrote in message
...
There's a language problem here that might be addressed on the show
"Are you smarter than a fifth grader." If it's a sea plane that
touches down, shouldn't it be called a watering? And if it's a crash
onto a water surface, is it a landing, or does one have to wait until
the airplane is on the bottom to say it's landed?

It's time for my meds: in this case it will be a Bombay Sapphire Gin
Martini, up. It's the only fitting end to a Monday.


On Mar 31, 5:44 pm, "Max" <luv2^fly^99@cox.^net> wrote:
> "Clark" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Steve Foley" > wrote in
> > news:6S8Ij.1943$ie3.1129
> > @trndny02:
>
> >> "Dylan Smith" > wrote in message
> ...
> >>> On 2008-03-31, buttman > wrote:
> >>> > On Mar 30, 3:07 pm, "akjcbkJA" > wrote:
> >>> >>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7321589.stm
>
> >>> > as opposed to a good citation crash?
>
> >>> Yes. A good Citation crash would be one where everyone walked away,
even
> >>> if the aircraft was totaled.
>
> >> Like the one at Bader Field in Atlantic City.
>
> >> But... If you can walk away, it was a 'good landing'. If you can fly
the
> >> plane again, it's a 'great landing', so I guess that wouldn't qualify
as
> >> a
> >> crash <g>
>
> > But where does riding a boat to shore or swimming away fit into the
> > landing
> > quality evaluation?
>
> Fire prevention. Saves the cost and clean-up of foaming the runway.- Hide
quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"B A R R Y" > wrote in message
. net...
> Max wrote:
>>
>>
>> Fire prevention. Saves the cost and clean-up of foaming the runway.
>
> Which is probably cheaper than the enviromental cleanup protection and
> cleanup in the bay. <G>

Well yeah, but then it comes out of a different budget.