The Joy Of Usenet: A message from 'Anonymous'

[Dan[_10_]]

Here's a message posted to my blog from the brave Mr "Anonymous":

"YOU are the same Dan from Usenet who has the audacity to claim hoew
****ing wonderful of a pilot you are when you don't have your CFI or a
plane that is worth a ****?"

[Editorial Note: I fly a Bonanza A36, a Bonanza 35 V tail, and C172s
and C182s.]

"Grow the **** up, McCormack. Google GrouperLooser."

[Has problems with spelling -- I'm guessing Mr Anonymous is 13, or
mildly retarded]

"PS. The most fun is watching that idiot FlyBoy kick your goddamned
asshole every other post. keep up the good werk. hahaha "

[It's spelled "work," -- but I'm sure he has little expereince with
the word.]

Well, this one is clearly a credit to himself, his parents, and his
minder.


Dan Mc

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

Dan > wrote in news:7f8c0582-a975-4b03-a0eb-
:

> Here's a message posted to my blog from the brave Mr "Anonymous":
>
> "YOU are the same Dan from Usenet who has the audacity to claim hoew
> ****ing wonderful of a pilot you are when you don't have your CFI or a
> plane that is worth a ****?"
>
> [Editorial Note: I fly a Bonanza A36, a Bonanza 35 V tail, and C172s
> and C182s.]
>
> "Grow the **** up, McCormack. Google GrouperLooser."
>
> [Has problems with spelling -- I'm guessing Mr Anonymous is 13, or
> mildly retarded]
>
> "PS. The most fun is watching that idiot FlyBoy kick your goddamned
> asshole every other post. keep up the good werk. hahaha "
>
> [It's spelled "work," -- but I'm sure he has little expereince with
> the word.]
>
> Well, this one is clearly a credit to himself, his parents, and his
> minder.
>
>

Yeah, he tried the same crap with me. As well as that he tried forging
me here, whihc kind of blew up in his face. Frankly, even though he
wasn't a very good Bertie, I did appreciate the help.


God I love my k00ks! Jay has real promise.


Bertie

[Tina]

One of the joys of these groups is that they are anonymous: it's
possible to put on display one's inner jerk, the true self. We shrinks
think the actions people take when they are not seen (or in this case
identified) are more a true measure of the worth than those taken when
being observed, or identified.








On Apr 3, 7:29 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> Dan > wrote in news:7f8c0582-a975-4b03-a0eb-
> :
>
>
>
> > Here's a message posted to my blog from the brave Mr "Anonymous":
>
> > "YOU are the same Dan from Usenet who has the audacity to claim hoew
> > ****ing wonderful of a pilot you are when you don't have your CFI or a
> > plane that is worth a ****?"
>
> > [Editorial Note: I fly a Bonanza A36, a Bonanza 35 V tail, and C172s
> > and C182s.]
>
> > "Grow the **** up, McCormack. Google GrouperLooser."
>
> > [Has problems with spelling -- I'm guessing Mr Anonymous is 13, or
> > mildly retarded]
>
> > "PS. The most fun is watching that idiot FlyBoy kick your goddamned
> > asshole every other post. keep up the good werk. hahaha "
>
> > [It's spelled "work," -- but I'm sure he has little expereince with
> > the word.]
>
> > Well, this one is clearly a credit to himself, his parents, and his
> > minder.
>
> Yeah, he tried the same crap with me. As well as that he tried forging
> me here, whihc kind of blew up in his face. Frankly, even though he
> wasn't a very good Bertie, I did appreciate the help.
>
> God I love my k00ks! Jay has real promise.
>
> Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

Tina > wrote in news:e90d898b-81c8-49cb-b8b0-
:

> One of the joys of these groups is that they are anonymous: it's
> possible to put on display one's inner jerk, the true self. We shrinks
> think the actions people take when they are not seen (or in this case
> identified) are more a true measure of the worth than those taken when
> being observed, or identified.
>
>
>

I agree. Having said that, I'm pretty much the same real life....


We have a professional message board elsewhere on the net and there was
a major discussion about a year ago involving my company. It was
hilarious watching some of the characters emerge. Great fun trying to
identify some of them, too. A couple were easy ( one who's called
"smithers" behind his back, for instance) Others, not so easy, but there
was much speculation in crew rooms afterwards. It was mostly the same
sort of thing you see here, but the added dimension of possibly sitting
next to one of the protaginists added some sauce to the whole thing.


Bertie

[Jay Honeck[_2_]]

> Here's a message posted to my blog from the brave Mr "Anonymous":

That's sad. I may be jinxing things by saying this, but Mary and I have
never, ever faced anything like that, despite years of hosting the
rec.aviation party at OSH (known as the "HOPS Party", by the way, for
"Homebuilt, Owning, Piloting, and Student" -- it's always held on the
Wednesday during OSH -- more on that later), thousands of posts over the
last decade, and being as open and honest about who we are as can be.
Heck, with one click of my signature line, you can see my 800 number and
CALL me on MY nickel. (Which, delightfully, over the years many of you
have! It's been a great pleasure to speak with many newsgroupies, and
several have become good friends.)

Don't call today, though -- I'm not there! (We're off to look at an old
Ercoupe here shortly...)

I have never -- not once -- been faced with an impolite, rude, crude or
scary person in "real life" because of my participation on these groups,
although many have stayed at our hotel. On the contrary, I have met some of
the nicest, most knowledgeable people thanks to these groups -- and
(although the trolls have tried their best to ruin it) I expect that to
continue.

Sure, things can get pretty boisterous around here, and a good, heated
argument breaks out from time to time (as our recent back-and-forth XM
thread will attest) -- but generally pilots are a cut above the rest of
humanity (in my observation) and don't stoop to this sort of crap.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

[buttman]

On Apr 3, 5:11*am, Dan > wrote:
> Here's a message posted to my blog from the brave Mr "Anonymous":
>
> "YOU are the same Dan from Usenet who has the audacity to claim hoew
> ****ing wonderful of a pilot you are when you don't have your CFI or a
> plane that is worth a ****?"
>
> [Editorial Note: I fly a Bonanza A36, a Bonanza 35 V tail, and C172s
> and C182s.]
>
> "Grow the **** up, McCormack. Google GrouperLooser."
>
> [Has problems with spelling -- I'm guessing Mr Anonymous is 13, or
> mildly retarded]
>
> "PS. The most fun is watching that idiot FlyBoy kick your goddamned
> asshole every other post. keep up the good werk. hahaha "
>
> [It's spelled "work," -- but I'm sure he has little expereince with
> the word.]
>
> Well, this one is clearly a credit to himself, his parents, and his
> minder.
>
> Dan Mc

I don't see the problem. All that stuff is true.

[buttman]

On Apr 3, 6:44*am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>
> I agree. Having said that, I'm pretty much the same real life....
>

thats a scary thought.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

buttman > wrote in news:a8594529-fa4e-4b37-b0d7-
:

> On Apr 3, 6:44*am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>>
>> I agree. Having said that, I'm pretty much the same real life....
>>
>
> thats a scary thought.
>

You betcha. I eat assholes like you for breakfast there too.



Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Jay Honeck" > wrote in
news:He6Jj.104089$yE1.15087@attbi_s21:

>> Here's a message posted to my blog from the brave Mr "Anonymous":
>
> That's sad. I may be jinxing things by saying this, but Mary and I
> have never, ever faced anything like that, despite years of hosting
> the rec.aviation party at OSH (known as the "HOPS Party", by the way,
> for "Homebuilt, Owning, Piloting, and Student" -- it's always held on
> the Wednesday during OSH -- more on that later), thousands of posts
> over the last decade, and being as open and honest about who we are as
> can be. Heck, with one click of my signature line, you can see my 800
> number and CALL me on MY nickel. (Which, delightfully, over the years
> many of you have! It's been a great pleasure to speak with many
> newsgroupies, and several have become good friends.)
>
> Don't call today, though -- I'm not there! (We're off to look at an
> old Ercoupe here shortly...)
>
> I have never -- not once -- been faced with an impolite, rude, crude
> or scary person in "real life" because of my participation on these
> groups, although many have stayed at our hotel. On the contrary, I
> have met some of the nicest, most knowledgeable people thanks to these
> groups -- and (although the trolls have tried their best to ruin it) I
> expect that to continue.
>
> Sure, things can get pretty boisterous around here, and a good, heated
> argument breaks out from time to time (as our recent back-and-forth XM
> thread will attest) -- but generally pilots are a cut above the rest
> of humanity (in my observation) and don't stoop to this sort of crap.



Yeh, nice try k00kie boi.


You and I know better, though, don't we?



Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

buttman > wrote in news:a174f83f-b52d-4cf5-b23b-
:

> On Apr 3, 5:11*am, Dan > wrote:
>> Here's a message posted to my blog from the brave Mr "Anonymous":
>>
>> "YOU are the same Dan from Usenet who has the audacity to claim hoew
>> ****ing wonderful of a pilot you are when you don't have your CFI or
a
>> plane that is worth a ****?"
>>
>> [Editorial Note: I fly a Bonanza A36, a Bonanza 35 V tail, and C172s
>> and C182s.]
>>
>> "Grow the **** up, McCormack. Google GrouperLooser."
>>
>> [Has problems with spelling -- I'm guessing Mr Anonymous is 13, or
>> mildly retarded]
>>
>> "PS. The most fun is watching that idiot FlyBoy kick your goddamned
>> asshole every other post. keep up the good werk. hahaha "
>>
>> [It's spelled "work," -- but I'm sure he has little expereince with
>> the word.]
>>
>> Well, this one is clearly a credit to himself, his parents, and his
>> minder.
>>
>> Dan Mc
>
> I don't see the problem. All that stuff is true.
>

And another psycho weighs in.


Bertie

[Max]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
> buttman > wrote in news:a8594529-fa4e-4b37-b0d7-
> :
>
>> On Apr 3, 6:44 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>>>
>>> I agree. Having said that, I'm pretty much the same real life....
>>>
>>
>> thats a scary thought.
>>
>
> You betcha. I eat assholes like you for breakfast there too.
>
>

Bull****, assholes like you are just as pathetic in real life.

[Max]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
> Tina > wrote in news:e90d898b-81c8-49cb-b8b0-
> :
>
>> One of the joys of these groups is that they are anonymous: it's
>> possible to put on display one's inner jerk, the true self. We shrinks
>> think the actions people take when they are not seen (or in this case
>> identified) are more a true measure of the worth than those taken when
>> being observed, or identified.
>>
>>
>>
>
> I agree. Having said that, I'm pretty much the same real life....
>
>
> We have a professional message board elsewhere on the net and there was
> a major discussion about a year ago involving my company. It was
> hilarious watching some of the characters emerge. Great fun trying to
> identify some of them, too. A couple were easy ( one who's called
> "smithers" behind his back, for instance) Others, not so easy, but there
> was much speculation in crew rooms afterwards. It was mostly the same
> sort of thing you see here, but the added dimension of possibly sitting
> next to one of the protaginists added some sauce to the whole thing.
>

Yeah, and they all believe you too.

Fantasy is a good thing, especially when you get older.

[Dan[_10_]]

On Apr 3, 8:28 am, Tina > wrote:
> One of the joys of these groups is that they are anonymous: it's
> possible to put on display one's inner jerk, the true self. We shrinks
> think the actions people take when they are not seen (or in this case
> identified) are more a true measure of the worth than those taken when
> being observed, or identified.
>

Kinda like the old saw about "Character is who you are when you are
alone?"

[Dan[_10_]]

On Apr 3, 3:23 pm, "Max" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote:


Nice, how appropriate that Max and buttman weigh in....

[Bertie the Bunyip]

On 3 Apr, 20:32, "Max" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote:
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in .com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > Tina > wrote in news:e90d898b-81c8-49cb-b8b0-
> > :
>
> >> One of the joys of these groups is that they are anonymous: it's
> >> possible to put on display one's inner jerk, the true self. We shrinks
> >> think the actions people take when they are not seen (or in this case
> >> identified) are more a true measure of the worth than those taken when
> >> being observed, or identified.
>
> > I agree. Having said that, I'm pretty much the same real life....
>
> > We have a professional message board elsewhere on the net and there was
> > a major discussion about a year ago involving my company. It was
> > hilarious watching some of the characters emerge. Great fun trying to
> > identify some of them, too. A couple were easy ( one who's called
> > "smithers" behind his back, for instance) Others, not so easy, but there
> > was much speculation in crew rooms afterwards. It was mostly the same
> > sort of thing you see here, but the added dimension of possibly sitting
> > next to one of the protaginists added some sauce to the whole thing.
>
> Yeah, and they all believe you too.
>
> Fantasy is a good thing, especially when you get older.- Hide quoted text -
>

I see you're stil reading at a fjukktard level.

Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip]

On 3 Apr, 21:17, Dan > wrote:
> On Apr 3, 8:28 am, Tina > wrote:
>
> > One of the joys of these groups is that they are anonymous: it's
> > possible to put on display one's inner jerk, the true self. We shrinks
> > think the actions people take when they are not seen (or in this case
> > identified) are more a true measure of the worth than those taken when
> > being observed, or identified.
>
> Kinda like the old saw about "Character is who you are when you are
> alone?"


Hmm, haven't heard that one before. I'll have ta think on that.

Bertie

[Eze]

>>>
>>> "PS. The most fun is watching that idiot FlyBoy kick your goddamned
>>> asshole every other post. keep up the good werk. hahaha "
>>>
>>> [It's spelled "work," -- but I'm sure he has little expereince with
>>> the word.]
>>>

"Work" is spelled "werk" in Dutch, maybe the guy's a cloggy (like me).

Jan

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
> On 3 Apr, 20:32, "Max" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote:
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in
>> .com...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > Tina > wrote in news:e90d898b-81c8-49cb-b8b0-
>> > :
>>
>> >> One of the joys of these groups is that they are anonymous: it's
>> >> possible to put on display one's inner jerk, the true self. We shrinks
>> >> think the actions people take when they are not seen (or in this case
>> >> identified) are more a true measure of the worth than those taken when
>> >> being observed, or identified.
>>
>> > I agree. Having said that, I'm pretty much the same real life....
>>
>> > We have a professional message board elsewhere on the net and there was
>> > a major discussion about a year ago involving my company. It was
>> > hilarious watching some of the characters emerge. Great fun trying to
>> > identify some of them, too. A couple were easy ( one who's called
>> > "smithers" behind his back, for instance) Others, not so easy, but
>> > there
>> > was much speculation in crew rooms afterwards. It was mostly the same
>> > sort of thing you see here, but the added dimension of possibly sitting
>> > next to one of the protaginists added some sauce to the whole thing.
>>
>> Yeah, and they all believe you too.
>>
>> Fantasy is a good thing, especially when you get older.- Hide quoted
>> text -
>>
>
> I see you're stil reading at a fjukktard level.
>


28

[Larry Dighera]

On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 04:11:19 -0700 (PDT), Dan >
wrote:

>Here's a message posted to my blog from the brave Mr "Anonymous": ...

[Off-topic junk snipped]


Who cares?


The charter of rec.aviation.piloting is:


************************************************** *****************
* Information pertinent to pilots of general aviation aircraft
* which would not fall into one of the other non-misc
* rec.aviation groups. Topics include, but are not limited to
* flying skills, interesting sights, destinations, flight
* characteristics of aircraft, unusual situations, handling
* emergencies, working with air traffic control, international
* flights, customs and immigration, experiences with
* ground support facilities, etc.

************************************************** *****************

Before posting articles to Usenet, please read the Usenet guidelines:
http://www.faqs.org/usenet/
http://users.rcn.com/kateshort/nnq/nnqlinks.html

[Travis Marlatte]

"Tina" > wrote in message
news:e90d898b-81c8-49cb-b8b0-
> One of the joys of these groups is that they are anonymous: it's
> possible to put on display one's inner jerk, the true self. We shrinks
> think the actions people take when they are not seen (or in this case
> identified) are more a true measure of the worth than those taken when
> being observed, or identified.

What does it say about those of us who don't hide behind anonymity?

-------------------------------
Travis
Lake N3094P
PWK

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Max" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:i9aJj.51680$097.13892
@newsfe21.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>> buttman > wrote in news:a8594529-fa4e-4b37-b0d7-
>> :
>>
>>> On Apr 3, 6:44 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I agree. Having said that, I'm pretty much the same real life....
>>>>
>>>
>>> thats a scary thought.
>>>
>>
>> You betcha. I eat assholes like you for breakfast there too.
>>
>>
>
> Bull****, assholes like you are just as pathetic in real life.
>
>
>

Snort!

Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> news:fc873f86-b48f-4e3e-b480-dfa3f5fce4f1
@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com..
> .
>> On 3 Apr, 20:32, "Max" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote:
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in
>>> .com...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > Tina > wrote in
>>> > news:e90d898b-81c8-49cb-b8b0-
>>> > :
>>>
>>> >> One of the joys of these groups is that they are anonymous: it's
>>> >> possible to put on display one's inner jerk, the true self. We
>>> >> shrinks think the actions people take when they are not seen (or
>>> >> in this case identified) are more a true measure of the worth
>>> >> than those taken when being observed, or identified.
>>>
>>> > I agree. Having said that, I'm pretty much the same real life....
>>>
>>> > We have a professional message board elsewhere on the net and
>>> > there was a major discussion about a year ago involving my
>>> > company. It was hilarious watching some of the characters emerge.
>>> > Great fun trying to identify some of them, too. A couple were easy
>>> > ( one who's called "smithers" behind his back, for instance)
>>> > Others, not so easy, but there
>>> > was much speculation in crew rooms afterwards. It was mostly the
>>> > same sort of thing you see here, but the added dimension of
>>> > possibly sitting next to one of the protaginists added some sauce
>>> > to the whole thing.
>>>
>>> Yeah, and they all believe you too.
>>>
>>> Fantasy is a good thing, especially when you get older.- Hide quoted
>>> text -
>>>
>>
>> I see you're stil reading at a fjukktard level.
>>
>
>
> 28
>
>
>

Ooops, slipping, though.


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

Larry Dighera > wrote in
:

> On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 04:11:19 -0700 (PDT), Dan >
> wrote:
>
>>Here's a message posted to my blog from the brave Mr "Anonymous": ...
>
> [Off-topic junk snipped]
>
>
> Who cares?
>
>
> The charter of rec.aviation.piloting is:
>
>
> ************************************************** *****************
> * Information pertinent to pilots of general aviation aircraft
> * which would not fall into one of the other non-misc
> * rec.aviation groups. Topics include, but are not limited to
> * flying skills, interesting sights, destinations, flight
> * characteristics of aircraft, unusual situations, handling
> * emergencies, working with air traffic control, international
> * flights, customs and immigration, experiences with
> * ground support facilities, etc.
>
> ************************************************** *****************
>
> Before posting articles to Usenet, please read the Usenet guidelines:
> http://www.faqs.org/usenet/
> http://users.rcn.com/kateshort/nnq/nnqlinks.html
>

netkkkkoping ****.


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

"Travis Marlatte" > wrote in news:LkiJj.66
:

> "Tina" > wrote in message
> news:e90d898b-81c8-49cb-b8b0-
>> One of the joys of these groups is that they are anonymous: it's
>> possible to put on display one's inner jerk, the true self. We shrinks
>> think the actions people take when they are not seen (or in this case
>> identified) are more a true measure of the worth than those taken when
>> being observed, or identified.
>
> What does it say about those of us who don't hide behind anonymity?

That you have masochism issues..


Bertie
>
>

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
> :
>
>>
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> news:fc873f86-b48f-4e3e-b480-dfa3f5fce4f1
> @e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com..
>> .
>>> On 3 Apr, 20:32, "Max" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote:
>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in
>>>> .com...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > Tina > wrote in
>>>> > news:e90d898b-81c8-49cb-b8b0-
>>>> > :
>>>>
>>>> >> One of the joys of these groups is that they are anonymous: it's
>>>> >> possible to put on display one's inner jerk, the true self. We
>>>> >> shrinks think the actions people take when they are not seen (or
>>>> >> in this case identified) are more a true measure of the worth
>>>> >> than those taken when being observed, or identified.
>>>>
>>>> > I agree. Having said that, I'm pretty much the same real life....
>>>>
>>>> > We have a professional message board elsewhere on the net and
>>>> > there was a major discussion about a year ago involving my
>>>> > company. It was hilarious watching some of the characters emerge.
>>>> > Great fun trying to identify some of them, too. A couple were easy
>>>> > ( one who's called "smithers" behind his back, for instance)
>>>> > Others, not so easy, but there
>>>> > was much speculation in crew rooms afterwards. It was mostly the
>>>> > same sort of thing you see here, but the added dimension of
>>>> > possibly sitting next to one of the protaginists added some sauce
>>>> > to the whole thing.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, and they all believe you too.
>>>>
>>>> Fantasy is a good thing, especially when you get older.- Hide quoted
>>>> text -
>>>>
>>>
>>> I see you're stil reading at a fjukktard level.
>>>
>>
>>
>> 28
>>
>>
>>
>
> Ooops, slipping, though.
>

30

[Larry Dighera]

On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 23:42:31 -0500, "Travis Marlatte"
> wrote:

>What does it say about those of us who don't hide behind anonymity?

It says that we possess the courage and integrity to expose our true
selves to the slings and arrows of life, rather than cower in the
shadows in fear, or mask our identity from recognition to escape
responsibility for our behavior like a bandit.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:yBoJj.44309$QC.11850
@newsfe20.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
>> :
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> news:fc873f86-b48f-4e3e-b480-dfa3f5fce4f1
>> @e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com..
>>> .
>>>> On 3 Apr, 20:32, "Max" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote:
>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in
>>>>> .com...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> > Tina > wrote in
>>>>> > news:e90d898b-81c8-49cb-b8b0-
>>>>> > :
>>>>>
>>>>> >> One of the joys of these groups is that they are anonymous:
it's
>>>>> >> possible to put on display one's inner jerk, the true self. We
>>>>> >> shrinks think the actions people take when they are not seen
(or
>>>>> >> in this case identified) are more a true measure of the worth
>>>>> >> than those taken when being observed, or identified.
>>>>>
>>>>> > I agree. Having said that, I'm pretty much the same real
life....
>>>>>
>>>>> > We have a professional message board elsewhere on the net and
>>>>> > there was a major discussion about a year ago involving my
>>>>> > company. It was hilarious watching some of the characters
emerge.
>>>>> > Great fun trying to identify some of them, too. A couple were
easy
>>>>> > ( one who's called "smithers" behind his back, for instance)
>>>>> > Others, not so easy, but there
>>>>> > was much speculation in crew rooms afterwards. It was mostly the
>>>>> > same sort of thing you see here, but the added dimension of
>>>>> > possibly sitting next to one of the protaginists added some
sauce
>>>>> > to the whole thing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, and they all believe you too.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fantasy is a good thing, especially when you get older.- Hide
quoted
>>>>> text -
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I see you're stil reading at a fjukktard level.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 28
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Ooops, slipping, though.
>>
>
> 30
>
>
>

And there ou go again.


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

Larry Dighera > wrote in
:

> On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 23:42:31 -0500, "Travis Marlatte"
> > wrote:
>
>>What does it say about those of us who don't hide behind anonymity?
>
> It says that we possess the courage and integrity to expose our true
> selves to the slings and arrows of life, rather than cower in the
> shadows in fear, or mask our identity from recognition to escape
> responsibility for our behavior like a bandit.
>
>
>

Where's the fun in that?

Bertie

[Jay Maynard]

On 2008-04-04, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
> From: "Travis Marlatte" >
>>What does it say about those of us who don't hide behind anonymity?
> It says that you probably don't have enough sense to come in out of
> the rain, either.

No, it says that the poster has enough honor and integrity to stand behind
his words.

(Hear that, Big John?)
--
Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com
http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net
Fairmont, MN (FRM) (Yes, that's me!)
AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC (ordered 17 March, delivery 2 June)

[Larry Dighera]

On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 20:20:02 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio
> wrote:

>From: Larry Dighera >
>
>>It says that we possess the courage and integrity to expose our true
>>selves to the slings and arrows of life, rather than cower in the
>>shadows in fear,
>
>Anyone who stands in the open when the arrows are flying in their
>direction, isn't brave. They're stupid.

In the case of real arrows, that may be true. In the case of Usenet,
it's absurd and reveals a certain paranoia.

>
>>or mask our identity from recognition to escape
>>responsibility for their behavior like a bandit.
>
>Or a sniper?

Indeed. A snipper is one who must conceal himself in order to escape
responsibility for his actions.

[William Hung[_2_]]

On Apr 3, 9:45*pm, Larry Dighera > wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 04:11:19 -0700 (PDT), Dan >
> wrote:
>
> >Here's a message posted to my blog from the brave Mr "Anonymous": ...
>
> [Off-topic junk snipped]
>
> Who cares?
>
> * * The charter of rec.aviation.piloting is:
>
> ************************************************** *****************
> * * * * Information pertinent to pilots of general aviation aircraft
> * * * * which would not fall into one of the other non-misc
> * * * * rec.aviation groups. *Topics include, but are not limited to
> * * * * flying skills, interesting sights, destinations, flight
> * * * * characteristics of aircraft, unusual situations, handling
> * * * * emergencies, working with air traffic control, international
> * * * * flights, customs and immigration, experiences with
> * * * * ground support facilities, etc.
>
> ************************************************** *****************
>
> Before posting articles to Usenet, please read the Usenet guidelines:
> * *http://www.faqs.org/usenet/
> * *http://users.rcn.com/kateshort/nnq/nnqlinks.html

Oh I get it. So it is OK when you post Off Topic but not anyone else.
So much for integrity.

Wil

[Rich Ahrens[_2_]]

on 4/4/2008 2:28 PM William Hung said the following:
> On Apr 3, 9:45 pm, Larry Dighera > wrote:
>> On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 04:11:19 -0700 (PDT), Dan >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Here's a message posted to my blog from the brave Mr "Anonymous": ...
>> [Off-topic junk snipped]
>>
>> Who cares?
>>
>> The charter of rec.aviation.piloting is:
>>
>> ************************************************** *****************
>> * Information pertinent to pilots of general aviation aircraft
>> * which would not fall into one of the other non-misc
>> * rec.aviation groups. Topics include, but are not limited to
>> * flying skills, interesting sights, destinations, flight
>> * characteristics of aircraft, unusual situations, handling
>> * emergencies, working with air traffic control, international
>> * flights, customs and immigration, experiences with
>> * ground support facilities, etc.
>>
>> ************************************************** *****************
>>
>> Before posting articles to Usenet, please read the Usenet guidelines:
>> http://www.faqs.org/usenet/
>> http://users.rcn.com/kateshort/nnq/nnqlinks.html
>
> Oh I get it. So it is OK when you post Off Topic but not anyone else.
> So much for integrity.

That's our Larry alright. Isn't he special?

[[email protected]]

On Apr 4, 6:00 pm, Nomen Nescio > wrote:

> No, they don't scare me.
> I'd just rather not have to explain why their brain matter is splattered
> all over the wall of my foyer.

Good point!

Though in the area I live in, the law favors the defender, not the
perps.


Dan Mc

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

Larry Dighera > wrote in
:

> On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 20:20:02 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio
> > wrote:
>
>>From: Larry Dighera >
>>
>>>It says that we possess the courage and integrity to expose our true
>>>selves to the slings and arrows of life, rather than cower in the
>>>shadows in fear,
>>
>>Anyone who stands in the open when the arrows are flying in their
>>direction, isn't brave. They're stupid.
>
> In the case of real arrows, that may be true. In the case of Usenet,
> it's absurd and reveals a certain paranoia.
>
>>
>>>or mask our identity from recognition to escape
>>>responsibility for their behavior like a bandit.
>>
>>Or a sniper?
>
> Indeed. A snipper is one who must conceal himself in order to escape
> responsibility for his actions.
>

No, a snipper is someone who selectively snips froups.

Like you do.

Bertie
>

[[email protected]]

On Apr 4, 7:10 pm, Nomen Nescio > wrote:

> Are you married?
> Do you have children?

I do, but all are quite competent with shotgun, rifle, and handgun.

My 17 year old son would simply tear the eyeballs out of the punk with
his bare hands.

> If I were some nutcase who decided you needed to be "taught a lesson"
> because I was offended by what you wrote (which I'm not, BTW), how
> would you feel about having me visit your house?
> How about if you weren't home, but the wife and kids were?

See above. No worries.

> And specific to this group:
> I could probably come up with a hundred things I could do to your plane
> that would go undetected at preflight, but make the thing somewhat less
> that airworthy. (and again, I never would).
> Do the wife and/or kids fly with you?

Gates, Hangar locks, lots of airport friends, and security patrols
help.

While anonymity can be beneficial, if you never **** anyone off in
life you're probably not doing enough.

I've had idiot threats before -- threats are empty. If they were as
tough/scary/vile as they want to seem they'd come on down.

Ain't gonna happen.


Dan Mc

[Maxwell[_2_]]

> wrote in message
...
> On Apr 4, 7:10 pm, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
>
> While anonymity can be beneficial, if you never **** anyone off in
> life you're probably not doing enough.
>

You're kidding right?

[Jay Maynard]

On 2008-04-04, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
>>No, it says that the poster has enough honor and integrity to stand behind
>>his words.
> I've got no problem standing behind my words. That's why I sign my
> posts.

Not with your name, you don't. That's not standing behind them.

> My rationale:
> If you've got nothing to hide, you've got nothing to protect.
> If you've got nothing to protect, you've got nothing.

I've got plenty to protect...and I'm capable of doing so, without resorting
to cowering in the shadows.

> Are you married?
> Do you have children?

No and no.

> If I were some nutcase who decided you needed to be "taught a lesson"
> because I was offended by what you wrote (which I'm not, BTW), how
> would you feel about having me visit your house?

To borrow a line: "Bring it on."

> How about if you weren't home, but the wife and kids were?

My roomomate is as capable of protecting himself as I am. If neither of us
is home, then I'm not worried at all.

> And specific to this group:
> I could probably come up with a hundred things I could do to your plane
> that would go undetected at preflight, but make the thing somewhat less
> that airworthy. (and again, I never would).

You'll run this risk whether or not you stand behind your words. Let's say
you **** off someone in traffic, and he follows you to the airport...

> That being said, I don't think too highly of the anonymous sniping that some
> people engage in (as in changing Usenet identities to conceal the fact that
> different posts are from the same individual)

Anonymity merely encourages that. If you're not standing behind your words,
there's no need to keep them civil.
--
Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com
http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net
Fairmont, MN (FRM) (Yes, that's me!)
AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC (ordered 17 March, delivery 2 June)

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:QYyJj.44358$QC.1365
@newsfe20.lga:

>
> > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Apr 4, 7:10 pm, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
>>
>> While anonymity can be beneficial, if you never **** anyone off in
>> life you're probably not doing enough.
>>
>
> You're kidding right?
>
>
>

Sez RAP's prime ****off underachiever. Still, keep trying!

Bertie

[[email protected]]

On Apr 4, 7:37 pm, "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote:
>
> You're kidding right?

Nope.

Go figure it out.

[Mxsmanic]

writes:

> My 17 year old son would simply tear the eyeballs out of the punk with
> his bare hands.

How often are you allowed to visit him?

[Jay Maynard]

On 2008-04-05, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
> From: " >
>>Though in the area I live in, the law favors the defender, not the
>>perps.
> I live in Massachusetts.
> 'nuff said?

That's one major reason I refuse to live there.
--
Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com
http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net
Fairmont, MN (FRM) (Yes, that's me!)
AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC (ordered 17 March, delivery 2 June)

[Jay Maynard]

On 2008-04-05, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
>>> If I were some nutcase who decided you needed to be "taught a lesson"
>>> because I was offended by what you wrote (which I'm not, BTW), how
>>> would you feel about having me visit your house?
>>To borrow a line: "Bring it on."
> Will you be as good at backing it up as Bush was?
> I can bring an awful lot of "shock and awe" to the party. :)

Perhaps, perhaps not. Life has risks. I'm not losing sleep over it; if
someone's determined enough to come to Fairmont, Minnesota to come after me,
there's not much that will deter him.

> Oh, your roommate.
> OK, I see now.

Your point is?

>>You'll run this risk whether or not you stand behind your words. Let's say
>>you **** off someone in traffic, and he follows you to the airport...
> If he steps out of his car with a weapon, he'll get a very loud surprise.

Good for you.

The point is that you run that risk every day, and it's much higher than the
risk someone will come across the country to attack you for what you say on
the net.

> I think you may be taking life a little too seriously, Jay.

*ME*??!! I can't take myself too seriously. If I tried, things like this
week's South Park would bring me crashing back down to earth.

> My philosophy is to treat people with courtesy, respect, and good humor.

But you don't respect us enough to stand behind your words.

> But always have a plan to kill everyone you meet. :)

Heh. You'd appreciate one of my favorite webcomics, Schlock Mercenary.
--
Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com
http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net
Fairmont, MN (FRM) (Yes, that's me!)
AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC (ordered 17 March, delivery 2 June)

[[email protected]]

On Apr 5, 12:26 am, Mxsmanic > wrote:
> writes:
> > My 17 year old son would simply tear the eyeballs out of the punk with
> > his bare hands.
>
> How often are you allowed to visit him?

That's so funny.

How about I visit you?

I'm thinking you and fakeflyboy are one in the same...

Both are morons.
Both are posers.
Both hide.
Both add no value.
Both have no real lives.

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
>
> And there ou go again.

34

[Jay Honeck[_2_]]

> But if someone here wants to buy me a drink,
> or tell me to go f&*K myself, I'll be happy to meet them somewhere.

See you at OSH!

;-)
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:QYyJj.44358$QC.1365
> @newsfe20.lga:
>
>>
>> > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Apr 4, 7:10 pm, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
>>>
>>> While anonymity can be beneficial, if you never **** anyone off in
>>> life you're probably not doing enough.
>>>
>>
>> You're kidding right?
>>
>>
>>
>
> Sez RAP's prime ****off underachiever. Still, keep trying!
>
> Bertie

35

[Maxwell[_2_]]

> wrote in message
...
> On Apr 4, 7:37 pm, "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote:
>>
>> You're kidding right?
>
> Nope.
>
> Go figure it out.
>

I've had you figured out since your first or second post. You're one of
those people that deserve all the misery you bring to yourself.

[[email protected]]

On Apr 5, 9:26 am, "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote:
>
> I've had you figured out since your first or second post. You're one of
> those people that deserve all the misery you bring to yourself.

::YAWN::

What you "think" means absolutely nothing.

To me or anyone else, for that matter.

[Maxwell[_2_]]

> wrote in message
...
> On Apr 5, 9:26 am, "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote:
>>
>> I've had you figured out since your first or second post. You're one of
>> those people that deserve all the misery you bring to yourself.
>
> ::YAWN::
>
> What you "think" means absolutely nothing.
>
> To me or anyone else, for that matter.
>

Then why would you bother to reply?

[[email protected]]

On Apr 5, 9:49 am, "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote:
>
> > What you "think" means absolutely nothing.
>
> > To me or anyone else, for that matter.
>
> Then why would you bother to reply?

Because I feel like it.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:QYyJj.44358$QC.1365
>> @newsfe20.lga:
>>
>>>
>>> > wrote in message
>>> news:cfab6d3b-1489-47e8-a0e5-666ab6e9f708
@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com
>>> ...
>>>> On Apr 4, 7:10 pm, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
>>>>
>>>> While anonymity can be beneficial, if you never **** anyone off in
>>>> life you're probably not doing enough.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You're kidding right?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Sez RAP's prime ****off underachiever. Still, keep trying!
>>
>> Bertie
>
> 35
>
>
>

Good boy!

Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:e%KJj.45877$f8.16432
@newsfe23.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> And there ou go again.
>
> 34
>
>
>

And again!

Please stop! You're huuuuurting me!


Bwawhahwhahwhah!

Bertie

[Mxsmanic]

writes:

> How about I visit you?

You haven't been invited.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:s6LJj.45879$f8.3615
@newsfe23.lga:

>
> > wrote in message
> news:29d97ad3-515a-45b6-a30d-61cadf3d48c4
@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>> On Apr 4, 7:37 pm, "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote:
>>>
>>> You're kidding right?
>>
>> Nope.
>>
>> Go figure it out.
>>
>
> I've had you figured out since your first or second post. You're one
of
> those people that deserve all the misery you bring to yourself.
>
>
>
>

And you don't deserve the misery you bring on yourself?


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

Mxsmanic > wrote in
:

> writes:
>
>> My 17 year old son would simply tear the eyeballs out of the punk with
>> his bare hands.
>
> How often are you allowed to visit him?
>

Oh a personal attack.Tch tch. Isn't this suppose to be beneath you Anthony,
or have you just fallen into the habit with your sockpuppet?


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

Mxsmanic > wrote in
:

> writes:
>
>> How about I visit you?
>
> You haven't been invited.
>

But I have. I think I'm doing a Paris stop in about two weeks. Gonna show
me around?



Bertie

[george]

On Apr 5, 11:10 am, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> From: Jay Maynard >

> >No, it says that the poster has enough honor and integrity to stand behind
> >his words.
>
> I've got no problem standing behind my words. That's why I sign my
> posts.

Yeah.
We see a lot of you as a 9/11 conspiracy kook in other groups

[george]

On Apr 6, 5:18 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> Mxsmanic > wrote :
>
> > writes:
>
> >> How about I visit you?
>
> > You haven't been invited.
>
> But I have. I think I'm doing a Paris stop in about two weeks. Gonna show
> me around?
>
Give him enough time to hide under his bed eh

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

george > wrote in
:

> On Apr 6, 5:18 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> Mxsmanic > wrote
>> :
>>
>> > writes:
>>
>> >> How about I visit you?
>>
>> > You haven't been invited.
>>
>> But I have. I think I'm doing a Paris stop in about two weeks. Gonna
>> show me around?
>>
> Give him enough time to hide under his bed eh
>
>

With the fluff bunnies?

Bertie

[george]

On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 04:51:42 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

> On Apr 5, 12:26 am, Mxsmanic > wrote:
>> writes:
>>> My 17 year old son would simply tear the eyeballs out of the punk with
>>> his bare hands.
>>
>> How often are you allowed to visit him?
>
> That's so funny.
>
> How about I visit you?
>
> I'm thinking you and fakeflyboy are one in the same...
>
> Both are morons.
> Both are posers.
> Both hide.
> Both add no value.
> Both have no real lives.
Both are kOOks you chase around like er, a K00k. don't you have a 17
year old to slap around?

[[email protected]]

On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 03:18:28 -0400, george wrote:

> On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 04:51:42 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
>
>> On Apr 5, 12:26 am, Mxsmanic > wrote:
>>> writes:
>>>> My 17 year old son would simply tear the eyeballs out of the punk with
>>>> his bare hands.
>>>
>>> How often are you allowed to visit him?
>>
>> That's so funny.
>>
>> How about I visit you?
>>
>> I'm thinking you and fakeflyboy are one in the same...
>>
>> Both are morons.
>> Both are posers.
>> Both hide.
>> Both add no value.
>> Both have no real lives.
> Both are kOOks you chase around like er, a K00k. don't you have a 17
> year old to slap around?

Don't you worry MX he will slit your throat in a heartbeat.

[[email protected]]

On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 10:40:07 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> From: " >
>
>>On Apr 4, 6:00 pm, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
>>
>>> No, they don't scare me.
>>> I'd just rather not have to explain why their brain matter is splattered
>>> all over the wall of my foyer.
>>
>>Good point!
>>
>>Though in the area I live in, the law favors the defender, not the
>>perps.
>>
>>
>>Dan Mc
>
> I live in Massachusetts.
> 'nuff said?

Anything you say fakeflyboy

[Jay Maynard]

On 2008-04-06, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
> Maybe it's just my personal life experience, but I've never gotten into any
> trouble from the 10...20....30% risk levels. A few of the .0001%'s have damn
> near killed me.
> I've learned to pay a LOT more attention to those .0001%'s, now.

"A one in a million chance happens nine times out of ten." -- Terry Pratchett

Pay attention to, yes. Get scared out of doing things by, no.

>>*ME*??!! I can't take myself too seriously. If I tried, things like this
>>week's South Park would bring me crashing back down to earth.
> Well, damn. If you can appreciate the genius behind South Park,
> you've just jumped up a few notches in my opinion.

Uhm, not particularly; South Park, to me, is little more than an excuse to
show 8-year-olds cussing like stevedores on national TV backed up by
terrible animation. I was referring to my "appearance" on this week's
episode. (Though I do wish they'd had me in to do the voice; the one they
gave me is rather badly wrong.)

>>> My philosophy is to treat people with courtesy, respect, and good humor.
>>But you don't respect us enough to stand behind your words.
> I'll stand behind them, just not in direct light.

That's not standing behind them. That's hiding from them.

>>Heh. You'd appreciate one of my favorite webcomics, Schlock Mercenary.
> Not familiar with it.
> Since you seem to like South Park, I thought I'd check it out.
> I guess you need to follow it regularly to figure out where it's going.

True...for a good place to pick up the story, follow the link lebeled
Schlock Mercenary Basic Training.

> I did get a kick out of rule 21:
> Rule 12 and 35 also deserve honorable mention:

My personal favorites are rule 37: "There is no 'overkill'. There is only
'open fire' and 'I need to reload'.", and rule 29: "The enemy of my enemy is
my enemy's enemy. No more. No less."
--
Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com
http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net
http://www.hercules-390.org (Yes, that's me!)
Buy Hercules stuff at http://www.cafepress.com/hercules-390

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

Jay Maynard > wrote in
:

> On 2008-04-06, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
>> Maybe it's just my personal life experience, but I've never gotten
>> into any trouble from the 10...20....30% risk levels. A few of the
>> .0001%'s have damn near killed me.
>> I've learned to pay a LOT more attention to those .0001%'s, now.
>
> "A one in a million chance happens nine times out of ten." -- Terry
> Pratchett
>
> Pay attention to, yes. Get scared out of doing things by, no.
>
>>>*ME*??!! I can't take myself too seriously. If I tried, things like
>>>this week's South Park would bring me crashing back down to earth.
>> Well, damn. If you can appreciate the genius behind South Park,
>> you've just jumped up a few notches in my opinion.
>
> Uhm, not particularly; South Park, to me, is little more than an
> excuse to show 8-year-olds cussing like stevedores on national TV
> backed up by terrible animation. I was referring to my "appearance" on
> this week's episode. (Though I do wish they'd had me in to do the
> voice; the one they gave me is rather badly wrong.)

Dude, if that is all you are worried about, you have some priorities
issues.


Bertie

[[email protected]]

On Apr 6, 2:00 pm, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> From: " >
>
> >Anything you say fakeflyboy
>
> Swing and a miss, Dan.
>
> I'm not WJRFlyBoy.
>
> Firepower is useless without proper target acquisition.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: N/A
>
> iQCVAwUBR/k35JMoscYxZNI5AQG4+wP+JfG5WLkZMjmNIL7DIDwsiTKw1KjD zfNB
> vW2I8CMa3psixkJ+dtRGhfw09rbMs8rak/FfBim8DcYSjMCARrRHLRaj+yc5/PIU
> hX0JeAazdpi/h1dM6iox9znGC4iwReRVsDeHPquQgGrmhh8tSvnfbGkjDR+2Aq 2O
> Fib1FNVB8Vg=
> =YqrB
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

I wasn't replying to you.

Ball!

[[email protected]]

On Apr 6, 4:40 pm, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
>
> Take a look at the post, again.
> Everything about it looks like you were replying to me.
> I was a little surprised by it, since I didn't think there were any
> ill feelings between us.
>

Nope, none at all.

:-)

[Jay Maynard]

On 2008-04-06, Nomen Nescio > quoted me from the South Park
forum:

> Wed Apr 02, 2008 7:30 pm2Fairmont, Minnesota
> I just caught the tail end of the episode after a friend IMd me...but she
> tells me they got my voice and accent all wrong. I'm from Texas and sound
> like it, but apparently they made me sound like I'm from Minnesota (where
> I currently live).
> - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> I'd be more concerned about the waistline, "Tron Guy". :)

*shrug* This is the body I've got.
--
Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com
http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net
Fairmont, MN (FRM) (Yes, that's me!)
AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC (ordered 17 March, delivery 2 June)

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:s6LJj.45879$f8.3615
> @newsfe23.lga:
>
>>
>> > wrote in message
>> news:29d97ad3-515a-45b6-a30d-61cadf3d48c4
> @b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>>> On Apr 4, 7:37 pm, "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You're kidding right?
>>>
>>> Nope.
>>>
>>> Go figure it out.
>>>
>>
>> I've had you figured out since your first or second post. You're one
> of
>> those people that deserve all the misery you bring to yourself.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> And you don't deserve the misery you bring on yourself?
>
>
> Bertie

What misery? I don't suffer from your sickness.

[Maxwell[_2_]]

> wrote in message
...
> On Apr 5, 9:49 am, "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote:
>>
>> > What you "think" means absolutely nothing.
>>
>> > To me or anyone else, for that matter.
>>
>> Then why would you bother to reply?
>
> Because I feel like it.
>

Then it obviously must matter, halfwit.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:aHcLj.46401$f8.33232
@newsfe23.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:s6LJj.45879$f8.3615
>> @newsfe23.lga:
>>
>>>
>>> > wrote in message
>>> news:29d97ad3-515a-45b6-a30d-61cadf3d48c4
>> @b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>>>> On Apr 4, 7:37 pm, "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> You're kidding right?
>>>>
>>>> Nope.
>>>>
>>>> Go figure it out.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I've had you figured out since your first or second post. You're one
>> of
>>> those people that deserve all the misery you bring to yourself.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> And you don't deserve the misery you bring on yourself?
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> What misery? I don't suffer from your sickness.
>
>

So, it's true. Ignorance really is bliss.



Bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
> :
>
>>
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:QYyJj.44358$QC.1365
>>> @newsfe20.lga:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> > wrote in message
>>>> news:cfab6d3b-1489-47e8-a0e5-666ab6e9f708
> @d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com
>>>> ...
>>>>> On Apr 4, 7:10 pm, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> While anonymity can be beneficial, if you never **** anyone off in
>>>>> life you're probably not doing enough.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You're kidding right?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sez RAP's prime ****off underachiever. Still, keep trying!
>>>
>>> Bertie
>>
>> 35
>>
>>
>>
>
> Good boy!
>
> Bertie

41

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:e%KJj.45877$f8.16432
> @newsfe23.lga:
>
>>
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> And there ou go again.
>>
>> 34
>>
>>
>>
>
> And again!
>
> Please stop! You're huuuuurting me!
>
>
> Bwawhahwhahwhah!
>
> Bertie
42

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:GTcLj.46405$f8.25168
@newsfe23.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> .. .
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
>> :
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:QYyJj.44358$QC.1365
>>>> @newsfe20.lga:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> > wrote in message
>>>>> news:cfab6d3b-1489-47e8-a0e5-666ab6e9f708
>> @d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> On Apr 4, 7:10 pm, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> While anonymity can be beneficial, if you never **** anyone off
in
>>>>>> life you're probably not doing enough.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You're kidding right?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sez RAP's prime ****off underachiever. Still, keep trying!
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>
>>> 35
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Good boy!
>>
>> Bertie
>
> 41
>
>
>

Bad boi!


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:STcLj.46406$f8.31104
@newsfe23.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:e%KJj.45877$f8.16432
>> @newsfe23.lga:
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> And there ou go again.
>>>
>>> 34
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> And again!
>>
>> Please stop! You're huuuuurting me!
>>
>>
>> Bwawhahwhahwhah!
>>
>> Bertie
> 42
>
>
>

The pain.


Bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:aHcLj.46401$f8.33232
> @newsfe23.lga:
>
>>
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:s6LJj.45879$f8.3615
>>> @newsfe23.lga:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> > wrote in message
>>>> news:29d97ad3-515a-45b6-a30d-61cadf3d48c4
>>> @b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>>>>> On Apr 4, 7:37 pm, "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're kidding right?
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope.
>>>>>
>>>>> Go figure it out.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I've had you figured out since your first or second post. You're one
>>> of
>>>> those people that deserve all the misery you bring to yourself.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> And you don't deserve the misery you bring on yourself?
>>>
>>>
>>> Bertie
>>
>> What misery? I don't suffer from your sickness.
>>
>>
>
> So, it's true. Ignorance really is bliss.
>
>
>
> Bertie

I don't know,,,, do you feel bliss??

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:GTcLj.46405$f8.25168
> @newsfe23.lga:
>
>>
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> .. .
>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
>>> :
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:QYyJj.44358$QC.1365
>>>>> @newsfe20.lga:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > wrote in message
>>>>>> news:cfab6d3b-1489-47e8-a0e5-666ab6e9f708
>>> @d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> On Apr 4, 7:10 pm, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> While anonymity can be beneficial, if you never **** anyone off
> in
>>>>>>> life you're probably not doing enough.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're kidding right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sez RAP's prime ****off underachiever. Still, keep trying!
>>>>>
>>>>> Bertie
>>>>
>>>> 35
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Good boy!
>>>
>>> Bertie
>>
>> 41
>>
>>
>>
>
> Bad boi!
>
>
> Bertie

50

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:STcLj.46406$f8.31104
> @newsfe23.lga:
>
>>
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:e%KJj.45877$f8.16432
>>> @newsfe23.lga:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> And there ou go again.
>>>>
>>>> 34
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> And again!
>>>
>>> Please stop! You're huuuuurting me!
>>>
>>>
>>> Bwawhahwhahwhah!
>>>
>>> Bertie
>> 42
>>
>>
>>
>
> The pain.
>
>
> Bertie

51

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:TCdLj.65010$y05.36172
@newsfe22.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:GTcLj.46405$f8.25168
>> @newsfe23.lga:
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> .. .
>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:QYyJj.44358$QC.1365
>>>>>> @newsfe20.lga:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:cfab6d3b-1489-47e8-a0e5-666ab6e9f708
>>>> @d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>> On Apr 4, 7:10 pm, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> While anonymity can be beneficial, if you never **** anyone off
>> in
>>>>>>>> life you're probably not doing enough.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're kidding right?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sez RAP's prime ****off underachiever. Still, keep trying!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>
>>>>> 35
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Good boy!
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>
>>> 41
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Bad boi!
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> 50
>


Oh, I got it now. It's how many buckets of froth you've filled up.


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:ICdLj.65009$y05.57899
@newsfe22.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:aHcLj.46401$f8.33232
>> @newsfe23.lga:
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:s6LJj.45879$f8.3615
>>>> @newsfe23.lga:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> > wrote in message
>>>>> news:29d97ad3-515a-45b6-a30d-61cadf3d48c4
>>>> @b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>> On Apr 4, 7:37 pm, "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're kidding right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Go figure it out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I've had you figured out since your first or second post. You're
one
>>>> of
>>>>> those people that deserve all the misery you bring to yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And you don't deserve the misery you bring on yourself?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>
>>> What misery? I don't suffer from your sickness.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> So, it's true. Ignorance really is bliss.
>>
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> I don't know,,,, do you feel bliss??
>
>
>



Oh no! He's got me with an IKYABWAI poast.




I'm screwed now!


Bwawhahwhahhwhahwhahwhhwhhahwhahwhahwhahwhhahwhahw h!


God I love usenet.


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:3DdLj.65011$y05.12677
@newsfe22.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:STcLj.46406$f8.31104
>> @newsfe23.lga:
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:e%KJj.45877$f8.16432
>>>> @newsfe23.lga:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And there ou go again.
>>>>>
>>>>> 34
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And again!
>>>>
>>>> Please stop! You're huuuuurting me!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bwawhahwhahwhah!
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>> 42
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> The pain.
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> 51
>
>
>

Oh stop.


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

zynteq7 > wrote in news:47fd60e4$0$6518
:

> Maxwell wrote:
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:e%KJj.45877$f8.16432
>>> @newsfe23.lga:
>>>
>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> And there ou go again.
>>>> 34
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> And again!
>>>
>>> Please stop! You're huuuuurting me!
>>>
>>>
>>> Bwawhahwhahwhah!
>>>
>>> Bertie
>> 42
>>
>>
> You missed the update, it's up to 42.1 now
>

He's missed mor than that.



Bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:TCdLj.65010$y05.36172
> @newsfe22.lga:
>
>>
>>> Bertie
>>
>> 50
>>
>
>
> Oh, I got it now. It's how many buckets of froth you've filled up.
>
>
> Bertie

No, but not a bad guess for an empty head.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:GMdLj.65018$y05.14758
@newsfe22.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:TCdLj.65010$y05.36172
>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>
>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>
>>> 50
>>>
>>
>>
>> Oh, I got it now. It's how many buckets of froth you've filled up.
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> No, but not a bad guess for an empty head.
>
>
>

Awww, you're still calling me names.

You make Bertie sad... :(


Bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:ICdLj.65009$y05.57899
> @newsfe22.lga:
>
>>
>
>
>
> Oh no! He's got me with an IKYABWAI poast.
>
>
>
>
> I'm screwed now!
>
>
> Bwawhahwhahhwhahwhahwhhwhhahwhahwhahwhahwhhahwhahw h!
>
>
> God I love usenet.
>
>
> Bertie

54

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:UPdLj.65020$y05.47554
@newsfe22.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:ICdLj.65009$y05.57899
>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Oh no! He's got me with an IKYABWAI poast.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm screwed now!
>>
>>
>> Bwawhahwhahhwhahwhahwhhwhhahwhahwhahwhahwhhahwhahw h!
>>
>>
>> God I love usenet.
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> 54
>
>
>


Nope, wrong again.


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:pXdLj.65029$y05.50812
@newsfe22.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> .. .
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:3DdLj.65011$y05.12677
>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>
>>>
>>> 51
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Oh stop.
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> 62
>
>
>

Dear dear.



Bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:3DdLj.65011$y05.12677
> @newsfe22.lga:
>
>>
>> 51
>>
>>
>>
>
> Oh stop.
>
>
> Bertie

62

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:SXdLj.65030$y05.38781
@newsfe22.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> .. .
>> zynteq7 > wrote in news:47fd60e4$0$6518
>> :
>>
>>> Maxwell wrote:
>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>
>>> You missed the update, it's up to 42.1 now
>>>
>>
>> He's missed mor than that.
>>
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> 63
>
>
>

And more again.



Bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
> zynteq7 > wrote in news:47fd60e4$0$6518
> :
>
>> Maxwell wrote:
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>
>> You missed the update, it's up to 42.1 now
>>
>
> He's missed mor than that.
>
>
>
> Bertie

63

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:GMdLj.65018$y05.14758
> @newsfe22.lga:
>
>>
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:TCdLj.65010$y05.36172
>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Bertie
>>>>
>>>> 50
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Oh, I got it now. It's how many buckets of froth you've filled up.
>>>
>>>
>>> Bertie
>>
>> No, but not a bad guess for an empty head.
>>
>>
>>
>
> Awww, you're still calling me names.
>
> You make Bertie sad... :(
>
>
> Bertie

..

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:UPdLj.65020$y05.47554
> @newsfe22.lga:
>
>>
>>
>> 54
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> Nope, wrong again.
>
>
> Bertie
>

65

[Jay Maynard]

On 2008-04-10, Maxwell <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote:
> 62

Maxwell, I suggest you look up the definition of "Breidbart Index"...because
you've exceeded it, and are thus subject to auto-cancellation as spam.
--
Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com
http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net
Fairmont, MN (FRM) (Yes, that's me!)
AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC (ordered 17 March, delivery 2 June)

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:n_dLj.65031$y05.23721
@newsfe22.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> .. .
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:GMdLj.65018$y05.14758
>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:TCdLj.65010$y05.36172
>>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>
>>>>> 50
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Oh, I got it now. It's how many buckets of froth you've filled up.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>
>>> No, but not a bad guess for an empty head.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Awww, you're still calling me names.
>>
>> You make Bertie sad... :(
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> .
>
>
>

So sad.



Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:V_dLj.65032$y05.44139
@newsfe22.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> .. .
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:UPdLj.65020$y05.47554
>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 54
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Nope, wrong again.
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>>
>
> 65
>
>
>

and agin

Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

Jay Maynard > wrote in
:

> On 2008-04-10, Maxwell <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote:
>> 62
>
> Maxwell, I suggest you look up the definition of "Breidbart
> Index"...because you've exceeded it, and are thus subject to
> auto-cancellation as spam.

Oow!

How about me?



BTW, for someoone who makes his living at computers, you sure know **** all
about usenet.

Bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:pXdLj.65029$y05.50812
> @newsfe22.lga:
>
>>
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> .. .
>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:3DdLj.65011$y05.12677
>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> 51
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Oh stop.
>>>
>>>
>>> Bertie
>>
>> 62
>>
>>
>>
>
> Dear dear.
>
>
>
> Bertie

78

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:SXdLj.65030$y05.38781
> @newsfe22.lga:
>
>>
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> .. .
>>> zynteq7 > wrote in news:47fd60e4$0$6518
>>> :
>>>
>>>> Maxwell wrote:
>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>>
>>>> You missed the update, it's up to 42.1 now
>>>>
>>>
>>> He's missed mor than that.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Bertie
>>
>> 63
>>
>>
>>
>
> And more again.
>
>
>
> Bertie
79

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:n_dLj.65031$y05.23721
> @newsfe22.lga:
>
>>
> So sad.
>
>
>
> Bertie
80

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:V_dLj.65032$y05.44139
> @newsfe22.lga:
>
>>
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> .. .
>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:UPdLj.65020$y05.47554
>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 54
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Nope, wrong again.
>>>
>>>
>>> Bertie
>>>
>>
>> 65
>>
>>
>>
>
> and agin
>
> Bertie

81

[george]

On Apr 10, 1:24 pm, Jay Maynard >
wrote:
> On 2008-04-10, Maxwell <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote:
>
> > 62
>
> Maxwell, I suggest you look up the definition of "Breidbart Index"...because
> you've exceeded it, and are thus subject to auto-cancellation as spam.

And there I was thinking that he was the Sesame Street count

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

gregvk > wrote in
:

> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in
> :
>
>> Jay Maynard > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>> On 2008-04-10, Maxwell <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote:
>>>> 62
>>>
>>> Maxwell, I suggest you look up the definition of "Breidbart
>>> Index"...because you've exceeded it, and are thus subject to
>>> auto-cancellation as spam.
>>
>> Oow!
>>
>> How about me?
>>
>>
>>
>> BTW, for someoone who makes his living at computers, you sure know
>> **** all about usenet.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> You should read what they're saying about him over in one of the
control
> groups.
>

Oh I've seen it.


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:lyeLj.27087$KJ1.22936
@newsfe19.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> .. .
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:SXdLj.65030$y05.38781
>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> .. .
>>>> zynteq7 > wrote in news:47fd60e4$0$6518
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> Maxwell wrote:
>>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>>>
>>>>> You missed the update, it's up to 42.1 now
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> He's missed mor than that.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>
>>> 63
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> And more again.
>>
>>
>>
>> Bertie
> 79
>
>
>

18+33



Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:QyeLj.27088$KJ1.1521
@newsfe19.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> .. .
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:n_dLj.65031$y05.23721
>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>
>>>
>> So sad.
>>
>>
>>
>> Bertie
> 80
>
>
>

It;s a sad sad situation

Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:0zeLj.27089$KJ1.3295
@newsfe19.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> .. .
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:V_dLj.65032$y05.44139
>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> .. .
>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:UPdLj.65020$y05.47554
>>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 54
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nope, wrong again.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>>
>>>
>>> 65
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> and agin
>>
>> Bertie
>
> 81
>
>

Nope.


Bertie
>

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:9yeLj.27086$KJ1.23700
@newsfe19.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> .. .
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:pXdLj.65029$y05.50812
>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> .. .
>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:3DdLj.65011$y05.12677
>>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 51
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Oh stop.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>
>>> 62
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Dear dear.
>>
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> 78
>
>
>

Suckah!


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

gregvk > wrote in
:

> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in news:ftkqg9$mpv$13
> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
>> gregvk > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in
>>> :
>>>
>>>> Jay Maynard > wrote in
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> On 2008-04-10, Maxwell <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote:
>>>>>> 62
>>>>>
>>>>> Maxwell, I suggest you look up the definition of "Breidbart
>>>>> Index"...because you've exceeded it, and are thus subject to
>>>>> auto-cancellation as spam.
>>>>
>>>> Oow!
>>>>
>>>> How about me?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BTW, for someoone who makes his living at computers, you sure know
>>>> **** all about usenet.
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>
>>> You should read what they're saying about him over in one of the
>> control
>>> groups.
>>>
>>
>> Oh I've seen it.
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> I thought it was a joke until somebody posted a URL. But it's even
> funnier knowing that it's real.
>


Unreal, really. I saw him first in a joke e-mail amongst a bunch of
other pics entitled "Why some women stay single"


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

gregvk > wrote in
. 1:

> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in news:ftlbsk$46v$3
> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
>> gregvk > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in news:ftkqg9$mpv$13
>>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>
>>>> gregvk > wrote in
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in
>>>>> :
>>>>>
>>>>>> Jay Maynard > wrote in
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2008-04-10, Maxwell <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 62
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maxwell, I suggest you look up the definition of "Breidbart
>>>>>>> Index"...because you've exceeded it, and are thus subject to
>>>>>>> auto-cancellation as spam.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oow!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How about me?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW, for someoone who makes his living at computers, you sure
know
>>>>>> **** all about usenet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>
>>>>> You should read what they're saying about him over in one of the
>>>> control
>>>>> groups.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Oh I've seen it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>
>>> I thought it was a joke until somebody posted a URL. But it's even
>>> funnier knowing that it's real.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Unreal, really. I saw him first in a joke e-mail amongst a bunch of
>> other pics entitled "Why some women stay single"
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Wasn't he the inspiration for the infamous S.C.U.M. manifesto? Or
maybe
> I have him confused with somebody else.
>

Dunno. It was just a collection of pics of guys doing things like
scratching their balls or painting themselves for sports events or..
dressing like Tron..


bertie

[Kloudy via AviationKB.com]

Jay Maynard wrote:


>
>You'll run this risk whether or not you stand behind your words. Let's say
>you **** off someone in traffic, and he follows you to the airport...
>


Unfortunately, seems like these days that is a very real possibility.

Happened to me after I accidently cut some body off driving to work. I just
didn't look over my shoulder and scared the guy half to death.
He followed me to work, (which was very early AM and in a rather deserted
industrial park at the time) got out of his car and attacked me with one of
those long handle-type flashlights.
He was bigger than me and I was scared to death. He landed one blow but since
I had some training that was all and he is now blind.
It is really sad that he just couldn't let it go. And I still feel like crap
about it.

Ya really must keep in mind there are kooks out there and ya never know where
they might be.

--
Message posted via AviationKB.com
http://www.aviationkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/aviation/200804/1

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

zynteq7 > wrote in
:

> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:lyeLj.27087$KJ1.22936
>> @newsfe19.lga:
>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> .. .
>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:SXdLj.65030$y05.38781
>>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>>
>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>> .. .
>>>>>> zynteq7 > wrote in news:47fd60e4$0$6518
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maxwell wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You missed the update, it's up to 42.1 now
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> He's missed mor than that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>> 63
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> And more again.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>> 79
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> 18+33
>>
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Yes but eventually it will all add up to 42.2 (a patch for the last
> update)


But what's the question?


bertie
>

[John \C\]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
> zynteq7 > wrote in
> :
>
> > Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
> >> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:lyeLj.27087$KJ1.22936
> >> @newsfe19.lga:
> >>
> >>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> >>> .. .
> >>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
news:SXdLj.65030$y05.38781
> >>>> @newsfe22.lga:
> >>>>
> >>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> >>>>> .. .
> >>>>>> zynteq7 > wrote in
news:47fd60e4$0$6518
> >>>>>> :
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Maxwell wrote:
> >>>>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> You missed the update, it's up to 42.1 now
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> He's missed mor than that.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Bertie
> >>>>> 63
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> And more again.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Bertie
> >>> 79
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> 18+33
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Bertie
> >
> > Yes but eventually it will all add up to 42.2 (a patch for the last
> > update)
>
>
> But what's the question?

What makes line A-B isomorphic to line C-D?

HJ

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"John \"C\"" > wrote in
et:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>> zynteq7 > wrote in
>> :
>>
>> > Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>> >> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:lyeLj.27087
$KJ1.22936
>> >> @newsfe19.lga:
>> >>
>> >>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> >>> .. .
>> >>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
> news:SXdLj.65030$y05.38781
>> >>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> >>>>> .. .
>> >>>>>> zynteq7 > wrote in
> news:47fd60e4$0$6518
>> >>>>>> :
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Maxwell wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> You missed the update, it's up to 42.1 now
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>> He's missed mor than that.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Bertie
>> >>>>> 63
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>> And more again.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Bertie
>> >>> 79
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> 18+33
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Bertie
>> >
>> > Yes but eventually it will all add up to 42.2 (a patch for the last
>> > update)
>>
>>
>> But what's the question?
>
> What makes line A-B isomorphic to line C-D?
>
> HJ
>
>

Good as any...

Bertie

[John \C\]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
> "John \"C\"" > wrote in
> et:
>
> >
> > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> zynteq7 > wrote in
> >> :
> >>
> >> > Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
> >> >> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:lyeLj.27087
> $KJ1.22936
> >> >> @newsfe19.lga:
> >> >>
> >> >>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> >> >>> .. .
> >> >>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
> > news:SXdLj.65030$y05.38781
> >> >>>> @newsfe22.lga:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> >> >>>>> .. .
> >> >>>>>> zynteq7 > wrote in
> > news:47fd60e4$0$6518
> >> >>>>>> :
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Maxwell wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> You missed the update, it's up to 42.1 now
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> He's missed mor than that.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Bertie
> >> >>>>> 63
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>> And more again.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Bertie
> >> >>> 79
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >> 18+33
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Bertie
> >> >
> >> > Yes but eventually it will all add up to 42.2 (a patch for the
last
> >> > update)
> >>
> >>
> >> But what's the question?
> >
> > What makes line A-B isomorphic to line C-D?
> >
> > HJ
>
> Good as any...
>
> Bertie

All righty. then....

HJ

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:lyeLj.27087$KJ1.22936
> @newsfe19.lga:
>
>>
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> .. .
>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:SXdLj.65030$y05.38781
>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>> .. .
>>>>> zynteq7 > wrote in news:47fd60e4$0$6518
>>>>> :
>>>>>
>>>>>> Maxwell wrote:
>>>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> You missed the update, it's up to 42.1 now
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> He's missed mor than that.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bertie
>>>>
>>>> 63
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> And more again.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Bertie
>> 79
>>
>>
>>
>
> 18+33
>
>
>
> Bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:QyeLj.27088$KJ1.1521
> @newsfe19.lga:
>
>>
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> .. .
>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:n_dLj.65031$y05.23721
>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>
>>>>
>>> So sad.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Bertie
>> 80
>>
>>
>>
>
> It;s a sad sad situation
>
> Bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:0zeLj.27089$KJ1.3295
> @newsfe19.lga:
>
>>
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> .. .
>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:V_dLj.65032$y05.44139
>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>> .. .
>>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:UPdLj.65020$y05.47554
>>>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 54
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope, wrong again.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 65
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> and agin
>>>
>>> Bertie
>>
>> 81
>>
>>
>
> Nope.
>
>
> Bertie
>>
>

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:9yeLj.27086$KJ1.23700
> @newsfe19.lga:
>
>>
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> .. .
>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:pXdLj.65029$y05.50812
>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>> .. .
>>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:3DdLj.65011$y05.12677
>>>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 51
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh stop.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bertie
>>>>
>>>> 62
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Dear dear.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Bertie
>>
>> 78
>>
>>
>>
>
> Suckah!
>
>
> Bertie
>

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:vtzLj.59111$yk5.24287
@newsfe18.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> .. .
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:9yeLj.27086$KJ1.23700
>> @newsfe19.lga:
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> .. .
>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:pXdLj.65029$y05.50812
>>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>> .. .
>>>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:3DdLj.65011
$y05.12677
>>>>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 51
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh stop.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>
>>>>> 62
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dear dear.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>
>>> 78
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Suckah!
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>>
>
>
>

OK, now you;'re just trying to get TOSsed.

There's no honour in that.

Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:ktzLj.59110$yk5.40615
@newsfe18.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> .. .
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:0zeLj.27089$KJ1.3295
>> @newsfe19.lga:
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> .. .
>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:V_dLj.65032$y05.44139
>>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>> .. .
>>>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:UPdLj.65020
$y05.47554
>>>>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 54
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope, wrong again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 65
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> and agin
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>
>>> 81
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Nope.
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>>>
>>
>
>
>

But on the plus side, you;ve never made more sense.



Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:btzLj.59109$yk5.58211
@newsfe18.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> .. .
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:QyeLj.27088$KJ1.1521
>> @newsfe19.lga:
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> .. .
>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:n_dLj.65031$y05.23721
>>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> So sad.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>> 80
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> It;s a sad sad situation
>>
>> Bertie
>
>
>

Sorry seems to be the hardest word

Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:1tzLj.59108$yk5.22226
@newsfe18.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> .. .
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:lyeLj.27087$KJ1.22936
>> @newsfe19.lga:
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> .. .
>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:SXdLj.65030$y05.38781
>>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>> .. .
>>>>>> zynteq7 > wrote in news:47fd60e4$0$6518
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maxwell wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You missed the update, it's up to 42.1 now
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He's missed mor than that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>
>>>>> 63
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And more again.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>> 79
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> 18+33
>>
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
>
>

Ooops!

you makee boo boo


Bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:vtzLj.59111$yk5.24287
> @newsfe18.lga:
>
>>
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> .. .
>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:9yeLj.27086$KJ1.23700
>>> @newsfe19.lga:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>> .. .
>>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:pXdLj.65029$y05.50812
>>>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>>> .. .
>>>>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:3DdLj.65011
> $y05.12677
>>>>>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 51
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh stop.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 62
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear dear.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bertie
>>>>
>>>> 78
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Suckah!
>>>
>>>
>>> Bertie
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> OK, now you;'re just trying to get TOSsed.
>
> There's no honour in that.
>
> Bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:ktzLj.59110$yk5.40615
> @newsfe18.lga:
>
>>
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> .. .
>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:0zeLj.27089$KJ1.3295
>>> @newsfe19.lga:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>> .. .
>>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:V_dLj.65032$y05.44139
>>>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>>> .. .
>>>>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:UPdLj.65020
> $y05.47554
>>>>>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 54
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope, wrong again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 65
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> and agin
>>>>>
>>>>> Bertie
>>>>
>>>> 81
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Nope.
>>>
>>>
>>> Bertie
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> But on the plus side, you;ve never made more sense.
>
>
>
> Bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:btzLj.59109$yk5.58211
> @newsfe18.lga:
>
>>
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> .. .
>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:QyeLj.27088$KJ1.1521
>>> @newsfe19.lga:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>> .. .
>>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:n_dLj.65031$y05.23721
>>>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> So sad.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bertie
>>>> 80
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> It;s a sad sad situation
>>>
>>> Bertie
>>
>>
>>
>
> Sorry seems to be the hardest word
>
> Bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:1tzLj.59108$yk5.22226
> @newsfe18.lga:
>
>>
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> .. .
>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:lyeLj.27087$KJ1.22936
>>> @newsfe19.lga:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>> .. .
>>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:SXdLj.65030$y05.38781
>>>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>>> .. .
>>>>>>> zynteq7 > wrote in news:47fd60e4$0$6518
>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maxwell wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You missed the update, it's up to 42.1 now
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He's missed mor than that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 63
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And more again.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bertie
>>>> 79
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> 18+33
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Bertie
>>
>>
>>
>
> Ooops!
>
> you makee boo boo
>
>
> Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:U6BLj.65634$y05.8810
@newsfe22.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:ktzLj.59110$yk5.40615
>> @newsfe18.lga:
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> .. .
>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:0zeLj.27089$KJ1.3295
>>>> @newsfe19.lga:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>> .. .
>>>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:V_dLj.65032
$y05.44139
>>>>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> .. .
>>>>>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:UPdLj.65020
>> $y05.47554
>>>>>>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 54
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nope, wrong again.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 65
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and agin
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>
>>>>> 81
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nope.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> But on the plus side, you;ve never made more sense.
>>
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
>
>

Never


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:O6BLj.65633$y05.26772
@newsfe22.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:vtzLj.59111$yk5.24287
>> @newsfe18.lga:
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> .. .
>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:9yeLj.27086$KJ1.23700
>>>> @newsfe19.lga:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>> .. .
>>>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:pXdLj.65029
$y05.50812
>>>>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> .. .
>>>>>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:3DdLj.65011
>> $y05.12677
>>>>>>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 51
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oh stop.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 62
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear dear.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>
>>>>> 78
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Suckah!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> OK, now you;'re just trying to get TOSsed.
>>
>> There's no honour in that.
>>
>> Bertie
>
>
>

none whatsoever.

Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:07BLj.65635$y05.7246
@newsfe22.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:btzLj.59109$yk5.58211
>> @newsfe18.lga:
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> .. .
>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:QyeLj.27088$KJ1.1521
>>>> @newsfe19.lga:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>> .. .
>>>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:n_dLj.65031
$y05.23721
>>>>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> So sad.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>> 80
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It;s a sad sad situation
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Sorry seems to be the hardest word
>>
>> Bertie
>
>
>

Zapped me agin!

Ouch!


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:67BLj.65636$y05.57214
@newsfe22.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:1tzLj.59108$yk5.22226
>> @newsfe18.lga:
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> .. .
>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:lyeLj.27087$KJ1.22936
>>>> @newsfe19.lga:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>> .. .
>>>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:SXdLj.65030
$y05.38781
>>>>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> .. .
>>>>>>>> zynteq7 > wrote in news:47fd60e4$0
$6518
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Maxwell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You missed the update, it's up to 42.1 now
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He's missed mor than that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 63
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And more again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>> 79
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 18+33
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Ooops!
>>
>> you makee boo boo
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
>
>

Boo boo!


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

zynteq7 > wrote in news:47fed1aa$0$16688
:

> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>> zynteq7 > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:lyeLj.27087$KJ1.22936
>>>> @newsfe19.lga:
>>>>
>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>> .. .
>>>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:SXdLj.65030
$y05.38781
>>>>>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> .. .
>>>>>>>> zynteq7 > wrote in news:47fd60e4$0
$6518
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Maxwell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You missed the update, it's up to 42.1 now
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He's missed mor than that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>>> 63
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> And more again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>> 79
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> 18+33
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>> Yes but eventually it will all add up to 42.2 (a patch for the last
>>> update)
>>
>>
>> But what's the question?
>>
>>
>> bertie
>>
>
> What's 41.1 + 0.1

Hnmmmmm..kkk.


>
> or What is the greatest number in the universe for the next week
>
> Take your pick
>

I'm going to go with "the number of hours it will take Maxie to blow a
gasket completely"



Bertie