I need to trace an IP address

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Does anyone have a means to trace to t least a general location the
following IP address?

72.191.163.46
Many thanks
--
Dudley Henriques

[Jim Logajan]

Dudley Henriques > wrote:
> Does anyone have a means to trace to t least a general location the
> following IP address?
>
> 72.191.163.46
> Many thanks

Probably somewhere in Texas - possibly Houston area (could be way out in
the countryside though). Obviously can't be sure. It's an IP address
belonging to RoadRunner, according to the DNS authority section. The
reverse DNS lookup yields the name:

cpe-72-191-163-46.elp.res.rr.com

Traceroute from my location a few moments ago terminated at:

gig0-1.elpstxh5-ubr2.elp.rr.com

The traceroute went through what appears to be a router in the Dallas area
and then possibly in Houston, based on guesses from probable host name
conventions used by RR.

Maybe someone with better tools and info can provide more accurate info.

What makes you interested, if I may ask?

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Jim Logajan wrote:
> Dudley Henriques > wrote:
>> Does anyone have a means to trace to t least a general location the
>> following IP address?
>>
>> 72.191.163.46
>> Many thanks
>
> Probably somewhere in Texas - possibly Houston area (could be way out in
> the countryside though). Obviously can't be sure. It's an IP address
> belonging to RoadRunner, according to the DNS authority section. The
> reverse DNS lookup yields the name:
>
> cpe-72-191-163-46.elp.res.rr.com
>
> Traceroute from my location a few moments ago terminated at:
>
> gig0-1.elpstxh5-ubr2.elp.rr.com
>
> The traceroute went through what appears to be a router in the Dallas area
> and then possibly in Houston, based on guesses from probable host name
> conventions used by RR.
>
> Maybe someone with better tools and info can provide more accurate info.
>
> What makes you interested, if I may ask?

Thanks for the feedback. I'm on a Mac and I don't have a DOS prompt.
After I posted I found the Network Utility with a Ping and Traceroute
Tab, so I just got the same data you did. Looks like Texas.

Reason is nothing sinister really; curiosity about a Usenet prankster.
:-)

--
Dudley Henriques

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Thanks much. Appreciate your time.


Nomen Nescio wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> From: Dudley Henriques >
>
>> Does anyone have a means to trace to t least a general location the
>> following IP address?
>>
>> 72.191.163.46
>> Many thanks
>> --
>> Dudley Henriques
>
> It shows up as
>
> Hostname
>
> cpe-72-191-163-46.elp.res.rr.com
>
> Geo-Location Information
>
> Country United States
> State/Region TX
> City El Paso
> Latitude 31.7958
> Longitude -106.3762
> Area Code 915
>
> at
> http://whatismyipaddress.com/
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: N/A
>
> iQCVAwUBSBBB3JMoscYxZNI5AQGuNQP+PeGmrdLTT8rd/5qU5ixxPBsNr4iusMZ2
> bGfHrCn7vJIQ9j4k41HUpAJ3yXF6H9PnRZKUoJwDZW9pl8nZ2y 9dXJZNm72AVO8M
> bdDUFl2m09BFscGzjMLokGh059aZTt4DlpO2evOjr02KcxpQ4g 0l2czUb8snepXb
> UO/REwL/fuY=
> =+a7O
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>


--
Dudley Henriques

[Jim Logajan]

Nomen Nescio > wrote:
> It shows up as
>
> Hostname
>
> cpe-72-191-163-46.elp.res.rr.com
>
> Geo-Location Information
>
> Country United States
> State/Region TX
> City El Paso
> Latitude 31.7958
> Longitude -106.3762
> Area Code 915
>
> at
> http://whatismyipaddress.com/

I'll try to remember that web site - though it places my own IP address in
Eugene Oregon - about 20 miles from where I really live. Close enough I
suppose for a really big nuke to take me out unless I duck! ;-)

[Stefan]

Dudley Henriques schrieb:

> Thanks for the feedback. I'm on a Mac and I don't have a DOS prompt.

Fire up Terminal.app and you'll a much more powerful tool: a Unix
prompt. ;-)

[Jay Maynard]

On 2008-04-24, Dudley Henriques > wrote:
>> cpe-72-191-163-46.elp.res.rr.com

elp == El Paso.

> Thanks for the feedback. I'm on a Mac and I don't have a DOS prompt.

No, but you do have a Unix command line: it's in Applications/Utilities/
Terminal.
--
Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com
http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net
Fairmont, MN (FRM) (Yes, that's me!)
AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC (ordered 17 March, delivery 2 June)

[Jay Maynard]

On 2008-04-24, Jim Logajan > wrote:
> Nomen Nescio > wrote:
>> http://whatismyipaddress.com/
> I'll try to remember that web site - though it places my own IP address in
> Eugene Oregon - about 20 miles from where I really live.

It places me in Minneapolis, about 125 miles wrong.
--
Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com
http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net
Fairmont, MN (FRM) (Yes, that's me!)
AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC (ordered 17 March, delivery 2 June)

[Michael Henry[_2_]]

> I'm on a Mac and I don't have a DOS prompt.


If you're using OS-X you've got something much, much better than a "DOS"
prompt. You've got a proper UNIX shell!

[WingFlaps]

On Apr 24, 6:06*pm, Dudley Henriques > wrote:
> Jim Logajan wrote:
> > Dudley Henriques > wrote:
> >> Does anyone have a means to trace to t least a general location the
> >> following IP address?
>
> >> 72.191.163.46
> >> Many thanks
>
> > Probably somewhere in Texas - possibly Houston area (could be way out in
> > the countryside though). Obviously can't be sure. It's an IP address
> > belonging to RoadRunner, according to the DNS authority section. The
> > reverse DNS lookup yields the name:
>
> > cpe-72-191-163-46.elp.res.rr.com
>
> > Traceroute from my location a few moments ago terminated at:
>
> > gig0-1.elpstxh5-ubr2.elp.rr.com
>
> > The traceroute went through what appears to be a router in the Dallas area
> > and then possibly in Houston, based on guesses from probable host name
> > conventions used by RR.
>
> > Maybe someone with better tools and info can provide more accurate info.
>
> > What makes you interested, if I may ask?
>
> Thanks for the feedback. I'm on a Mac and I don't have a DOS prompt.


Use terminal and all the rich tools of UNIX are at you disposal.

Cheers

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Dudley Henriques wrote:
> Does anyone have a means to trace to t least a general location the
> following IP address?
>
> 72.191.163.46
> Many thanks


Thanks everybody who answered . I have it sorted out.

--
Dudley Henriques

[Gig 601Xl Builder]

Dudley Henriques wrote:
> Does anyone have a means to trace to t least a general location the
> following IP address?
>
> 72.191.163.46
> Many thanks


Try this. It works sometimes.

http://www.geobytes.com/IpLocator.htm?GetLocation


How well it works seems to have a lot to do with how the IP users ISP is
set up.

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Gig 601Xl Builder wrote:
> Dudley Henriques wrote:
>> Does anyone have a means to trace to t least a general location the
>> following IP address?
>>
>> 72.191.163.46
>> Many thanks
>
>
> Try this. It works sometimes.
>
> http://www.geobytes.com/IpLocator.htm?GetLocation
>
>
> How well it works seems to have a lot to do with how the IP users ISP is
> set up.
That's a handy site. I booked it. Thanks.


--
Dudley Henriques

[buttman]

On Apr 24, 12:00*am, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
>
> It shows up as
>
> Hostname
>
> * * * cpe-72-191-163-46.elp.res.rr.com
>
> Geo-Location Information
>
> * * * Country * United States
> * * * State/Region * * *TX
> * * * City * * *El Paso
> * * * Latitude *31.7958
> * * * Longitude -106.3762
> * * * Area Code 915

Oh hey, El Paso, thats where I live, great town 8)

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

buttman > wrote in news:c17c81d0-d051-4b54-ac65-
:

> On Apr 24, 12:00*am, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
>>
>> It shows up as
>>
>> Hostname
>>
>> * * * cpe-72-191-163-46.elp.res.rr.com
>>
>> Geo-Location Information
>>
>> * * * Country * United States
>> * * * State/Region * * *TX
>> * * * City * * *El Paso
>> * * * Latitude *31.7958
>> * * * Longitude -106.3762
>> * * * Area Code 915
>
> Oh hey, El Paso, thats where I live, great town 8)
>

What a coincidence! You can help Dudley track the psycho down!

Bertie

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
> buttman > wrote in news:c17c81d0-d051-4b54-ac65-
> :
>
>> On Apr 24, 12:00 am, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
>>> It shows up as
>>>
>>> Hostname
>>>
>>> cpe-72-191-163-46.elp.res.rr.com
>>>
>>> Geo-Location Information
>>>
>>> Country United States
>>> State/Region TX
>>> City El Paso
>>> Latitude 31.7958
>>> Longitude -106.3762
>>> Area Code 915
>> Oh hey, El Paso, thats where I live, great town 8)
>>
>
> What a coincidence! You can help Dudley track the psycho down!
>
> Bertie

No need. I've already taken steps with Wikipedia that will remove the
biographical sketch by my own request.
The requests I get for this information are declining anyway, and our
office can handle it here when and if needed.
When the bio was uploaded to Wiki, I should have realized and taken into
account Usenet nonsense.
No biggie at all.


--
Dudley Henriques

[Larry Dighera]

On 24 Apr 2008 19:06:48 GMT, gregvk > wrote in
>:

>Newsgroups: rec.aviation.piloting,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.v ampire.flonk.flonk.flonk

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

Dudley Henriques > wrote in
:

> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>> buttman > wrote in news:c17c81d0-d051-4b54-ac65-
>> :
>>
>>> On Apr 24, 12:00 am, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
>>>> It shows up as
>>>>
>>>> Hostname
>>>>
>>>> cpe-72-191-163-46.elp.res.rr.com
>>>>
>>>> Geo-Location Information
>>>>
>>>> Country United States
>>>> State/Region TX
>>>> City El Paso
>>>> Latitude 31.7958
>>>> Longitude -106.3762
>>>> Area Code 915
>>> Oh hey, El Paso, thats where I live, great town 8)
>>>
>>
>> What a coincidence! You can help Dudley track the psycho down!
>>
>> Bertie
>
> No need. I've already taken steps with Wikipedia that will remove the
> biographical sketch by my own request.
> The requests I get for this information are declining anyway, and our
> office can handle it here when and if needed.
> When the bio was uploaded to Wiki, I should have realized and taken
into
> account Usenet nonsense.
> No biggie at all.
>
>

Oh, someone added some nasty stuff to your Wiki page, eh?


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

gregvk > wrote in news:Xns9A8A85633D581E817AC3D8380227@
127.0.0.1:

> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in news:fuqkut$fcs$2
> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
>> buttman > wrote in news:c17c81d0-d051-4b54-ac65-
>> :
>>
>>> On Apr 24, 12:00*am, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It shows up as
>>>>
>>>> Hostname
>>>>
>>>> * * * cpe-72-191-163-46.elp.res.rr.com
>>>>
>>>> Geo-Location Information
>>>>
>>>> * * * Country * United States
>>>> * * * State/Region * * *TX
>>>> * * * City * * *El Paso
>>>> * * * Latitude *31.7958
>>>> * * * Longitude -106.3762
>>>> * * * Area Code 915
>>>
>>> Oh hey, El Paso, thats where I live, great town 8)
>>>
>>
>> What a coincidence! You can help Dudley track the psycho down!
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Here's a complete list of all the great stuff and fun things to do in El
> Paso:
>

Never been. Flew over it once. As near as I can tell, it;'s the world's
biggest trailer park.


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

Larry Dighera > wrote in
:

> On 24 Apr 2008 19:06:48 GMT, gregvk > wrote in
> >:
>
>>Newsgroups:
>>rec.aviation.piloting,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.v ampire.flonk.flonk.fl
>>onk
>

rec.aviation.piloting,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.v ampire.flonk.flonk.flonk


Awww, Larry, the Netkkkop is warning everyone of something, I think...

Bertie

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
> :
>
>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>> buttman > wrote in news:c17c81d0-d051-4b54-ac65-
>>> :
>>>
>>>> On Apr 24, 12:00 am, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
>>>>> It shows up as
>>>>>
>>>>> Hostname
>>>>>
>>>>> cpe-72-191-163-46.elp.res.rr.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Geo-Location Information
>>>>>
>>>>> Country United States
>>>>> State/Region TX
>>>>> City El Paso
>>>>> Latitude 31.7958
>>>>> Longitude -106.3762
>>>>> Area Code 915
>>>> Oh hey, El Paso, thats where I live, great town 8)
>>>>
>>> What a coincidence! You can help Dudley track the psycho down!
>>>
>>> Bertie
>> No need. I've already taken steps with Wikipedia that will remove the
>> biographical sketch by my own request.
>> The requests I get for this information are declining anyway, and our
>> office can handle it here when and if needed.
>> When the bio was uploaded to Wiki, I should have realized and taken
> into
>> account Usenet nonsense.
>> No biggie at all.
>>
>>
>
> Oh, someone added some nasty stuff to your Wiki page, eh?
>
>
> Bertie

No. Just have no need for it and it seems to bring put all the kooks to
reference it for whatever the idiotic reasons are that motivate them.
:-))

--
Dudley Henriques

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

Dudley Henriques > wrote in
:

> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>> buttman > wrote in news:c17c81d0-d051-4b54-ac65-
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 24, 12:00 am, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
>>>>>> It shows up as
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hostname
>>>>>>
>>>>>> cpe-72-191-163-46.elp.res.rr.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Geo-Location Information
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Country United States
>>>>>> State/Region TX
>>>>>> City El Paso
>>>>>> Latitude 31.7958
>>>>>> Longitude -106.3762
>>>>>> Area Code 915
>>>>> Oh hey, El Paso, thats where I live, great town 8)
>>>>>
>>>> What a coincidence! You can help Dudley track the psycho down!
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>> No need. I've already taken steps with Wikipedia that will remove
the
>>> biographical sketch by my own request.
>>> The requests I get for this information are declining anyway, and
our
>>> office can handle it here when and if needed.
>>> When the bio was uploaded to Wiki, I should have realized and taken
>> into
>>> account Usenet nonsense.
>>> No biggie at all.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Oh, someone added some nasty stuff to your Wiki page, eh?
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> No. Just have no need for it and it seems to bring put all the kooks
to
> reference it for whatever the idiotic reasons are that motivate them.
>:-))
>

Ah, OK. I thought it had to do with the k00k from texas.

i wonder what buttman's wiki entry would look like?



Bertie

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
> :
>
>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>> :
>>>
>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>> buttman > wrote in news:c17c81d0-d051-4b54-ac65-
>>>>> :
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 24, 12:00 am, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
>>>>>>> It shows up as
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hostname
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> cpe-72-191-163-46.elp.res.rr.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Geo-Location Information
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Country United States
>>>>>>> State/Region TX
>>>>>>> City El Paso
>>>>>>> Latitude 31.7958
>>>>>>> Longitude -106.3762
>>>>>>> Area Code 915
>>>>>> Oh hey, El Paso, thats where I live, great town 8)
>>>>>>
>>>>> What a coincidence! You can help Dudley track the psycho down!
>>>>>
>>>>> Bertie
>>>> No need. I've already taken steps with Wikipedia that will remove
> the
>>>> biographical sketch by my own request.
>>>> The requests I get for this information are declining anyway, and
> our
>>>> office can handle it here when and if needed.
>>>> When the bio was uploaded to Wiki, I should have realized and taken
>>> into
>>>> account Usenet nonsense.
>>>> No biggie at all.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Oh, someone added some nasty stuff to your Wiki page, eh?
>>>
>>>
>>> Bertie
>> No. Just have no need for it and it seems to bring put all the kooks
> to
>> reference it for whatever the idiotic reasons are that motivate them.
>> :-))
>>
>
> Ah, OK. I thought it had to do with the k00k from texas.
>
> i wonder what buttman's wiki entry would look like?
>
>
>
> Bertie

Don't know. Each pilot has to make their own mark on the profession.
Time has a way of sorting these things out for sure :-)

--
Dudley Henriques

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

Dudley Henriques > wrote in
:

> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>>> buttman > wrote in news:c17c81d0-d051-4b54-
ac65-
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Apr 24, 12:00 am, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
>>>>>>>> It shows up as
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hostname
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> cpe-72-191-163-46.elp.res.rr.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Geo-Location Information
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Country United States
>>>>>>>> State/Region TX
>>>>>>>> City El Paso
>>>>>>>> Latitude 31.7958
>>>>>>>> Longitude -106.3762
>>>>>>>> Area Code 915
>>>>>>> Oh hey, El Paso, thats where I live, great town 8)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> What a coincidence! You can help Dudley track the psycho down!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>> No need. I've already taken steps with Wikipedia that will remove
>> the
>>>>> biographical sketch by my own request.
>>>>> The requests I get for this information are declining anyway, and
>> our
>>>>> office can handle it here when and if needed.
>>>>> When the bio was uploaded to Wiki, I should have realized and
taken
>>>> into
>>>>> account Usenet nonsense.
>>>>> No biggie at all.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Oh, someone added some nasty stuff to your Wiki page, eh?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>> No. Just have no need for it and it seems to bring put all the kooks
>> to
>>> reference it for whatever the idiotic reasons are that motivate
them.
>>> :-))
>>>
>>
>> Ah, OK. I thought it had to do with the k00k from texas.
>>
>> i wonder what buttman's wiki entry would look like?
>>
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Don't know. Each pilot has to make their own mark on the profession.
> Time has a way of sorting these things out for sure :-)


Hmmm.. I can only imagine how time will sort him out.


Bertie

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
> :
>
>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>> :
>>>
>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>>>> :
>>>>>
>>>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>>>> buttman > wrote in news:c17c81d0-d051-4b54-
> ac65-
>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Apr 24, 12:00 am, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
>>>>>>>>> It shows up as
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hostname
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> cpe-72-191-163-46.elp.res.rr.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Geo-Location Information
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Country United States
>>>>>>>>> State/Region TX
>>>>>>>>> City El Paso
>>>>>>>>> Latitude 31.7958
>>>>>>>>> Longitude -106.3762
>>>>>>>>> Area Code 915
>>>>>>>> Oh hey, El Paso, thats where I live, great town 8)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What a coincidence! You can help Dudley track the psycho down!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>> No need. I've already taken steps with Wikipedia that will remove
>>> the
>>>>>> biographical sketch by my own request.
>>>>>> The requests I get for this information are declining anyway, and
>>> our
>>>>>> office can handle it here when and if needed.
>>>>>> When the bio was uploaded to Wiki, I should have realized and
> taken
>>>>> into
>>>>>> account Usenet nonsense.
>>>>>> No biggie at all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, someone added some nasty stuff to your Wiki page, eh?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bertie
>>>> No. Just have no need for it and it seems to bring put all the kooks
>>> to
>>>> reference it for whatever the idiotic reasons are that motivate
> them.
>>>> :-))
>>>>
>>> Ah, OK. I thought it had to do with the k00k from texas.
>>>
>>> i wonder what buttman's wiki entry would look like?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Bertie
>> Don't know. Each pilot has to make their own mark on the profession.
>> Time has a way of sorting these things out for sure :-)
>
>
> Hmmm.. I can only imagine how time will sort him out.
>
>
> Bertie

He and I don't seem to view flight instruction the same way. I guess
time will sort out if one of us was wrong.

--
Dudley Henriques

[Larry Dighera]

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:59:15 -0400, Dudley Henriques
> wrote in
>:

>it seems to bring put all the kooks to
>reference it for whatever the idiotic reasons are that motivate them.

If you had bothered to remove the crosspost to kook newsgroups from
your followup, you might see less of that sort of activity. Just a
thought. :)

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Larry Dighera wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:59:15 -0400, Dudley Henriques
> > wrote in
> >:
>
>> it seems to bring put all the kooks to
>> reference it for whatever the idiotic reasons are that motivate them.
>
> If you had bothered to remove the crosspost to kook newsgroups from
> your followup, you might see less of that sort of activity. Just a
> thought. :)

Don't think so. The person causing the "activity" is right here on this
forum.
I do agree however that eliminating the other forums would have been
better procedure in this case.

--
Dudley Henriques

[Jim Logajan]

gregvk > wrote:
> He's not "warning" anyone of anything they can't see for themselves. He
> must think everyone is ****ing stupid.

Sigh.

He suspects that you are counting on a few people to overlook the change in
the Newsgroups header. It happens not through stupidity but simple
oversight. You know that and I know that and Larry knows that.

I've seen it happen and have no doubt you have too. The classic trick used
to be to add misc.test so that anyone responding who wasn't paying
attention would get auto-responder e-mails they weren't expecting. But in
an age of constant spam, that old trick is like spitting into the ocean.
(Plus the number of autoresponders is down to one or two I think.)

Say - you could always try to fight your own fights rather than trying to
drag in hounds from other groups.

Go ahead and deny part or all of above - it wont change what I think. And
oh yeah, you'll say you don't care what I think. But if that were true you
wouldn't even be posting to a discussion group. The whole point of posting
anything at all to a discussion group is presumably because you "care" in
some sense (even if it might be a perverse one) in how people think and
respond to the postings.

Sigh.

[buttman]

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:06:39 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:

>
> No need. I've already taken steps with Wikipedia that will remove the
> biographical sketch by my own request. The requests I get for this
> information are declining anyway, and our office can handle it here when
> and if needed. When the bio was uploaded to Wiki, I should have realized
> and taken into account Usenet nonsense.
> No biggie at all.

Funny, as just yesterday you were defending the page, saying it was
"frequently" needed:

"Just to enlighten you, I serve an many real world aviation safety think
tanks where requests for a bio are frequently asked for. The wiki page
simply makes it easier for interested people to access requested
information."

Now that the wikipedia admins are deleting it, you're now saying the page
is not needed?

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Buttman wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:06:39 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
>
>> No need. I've already taken steps with Wikipedia that will remove the
>> biographical sketch by my own request. The requests I get for this
>> information are declining anyway, and our office can handle it here when
>> and if needed. When the bio was uploaded to Wiki, I should have realized
>> and taken into account Usenet nonsense.
>> No biggie at all.
>
> Funny, as just yesterday you were defending the page, saying it was
> "frequently" needed:
>
> "Just to enlighten you, I serve an many real world aviation safety think
> tanks where requests for a bio are frequently asked for. The wiki page
> simply makes it easier for interested people to access requested
> information."
>
> Now that the wikipedia admins are deleting it, you're now saying the page
> is not needed?

Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation.
The quote you have presented here without the accompanying text that
completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked by
another poster. In other words, the information about the bio was NOT
used until it was mentioned negatively by someone else and in response
to what was said.

As for my asking that the bio be deleted; that decision was made for the
exact reasons given and has nothing whatsoever to do with Wikipedia.

For your information, Wikipedia "deletes" thousands of files they feel
are unnecessary and take up needed space on their site. Our decision to
add to the deletion process was simply offered to inform Wiki that we
understand the situation completely.

God, what a small world you live in.


--
Dudley Henriques

[gatt[_3_]]

Dudley Henriques wrote:
> Larry Dighera wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:59:15 -0400, Dudley Henriques

>
> Don't think so. The person causing the "activity" is right here on this
> forum. I do agree however that eliminating the other forums would have been
> better procedure in this case.

If he's doing something that's libelous or damaging to your professional
reputation, you can get a lawyer to send a subpoena to RR.COM. That's
how you get their personal information, and it -definately- gets the
attention of their internet provider.

(I'm an abuse admin.)

-c

[buttman]

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:41:50 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
>
> Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation. The
> quote you have presented here without the accompanying text that
> completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked by
> another poster. In other words, the information about the bio was NOT
> used until it was mentioned negatively by someone else and in response
> to what was said.
>

And that changes things, how? One day someone accuses your article of
being crap, you defend it. The next day someone else call it crap by
flagging it, and now you inform the wikipedia admins that you agree it
should be deleted?

> As for my asking that the bio be deleted; that decision was made for the
> exact reasons given and has nothing whatsoever to do with Wikipedia.

Oh, I see. Its just a coincidence that you decide to remove your self-
written vanity article less than 12 hours after somebody with a
roadrunner connection in El Paso (which may or may not be me) decides to
flag it as against the wikipedia guidelines.

>
> For your information, Wikipedia "deletes" thousands of files they feel
> are unnecessary and take up needed space on their site.

Yeah, like your crap article.

> Our decision to
> add to the deletion process was simply offered to inform Wiki that we
> understand the situation completely.

"Our"? Oh please.

>
> God, what a small world you live in.

Maybe one of these days you'll realize you're not as important as you
think you are.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

Dudley Henriques > wrote in
:

> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>>>>> buttman > wrote in news:c17c81d0-d051-4b54-
>> ac65-
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Apr 24, 12:00 am, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> It shows up as
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hostname
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> cpe-72-191-163-46.elp.res.rr.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Geo-Location Information
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Country United States
>>>>>>>>>> State/Region TX
>>>>>>>>>> City El Paso
>>>>>>>>>> Latitude 31.7958
>>>>>>>>>> Longitude -106.3762
>>>>>>>>>> Area Code 915
>>>>>>>>> Oh hey, El Paso, thats where I live, great town 8)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What a coincidence! You can help Dudley track the psycho down!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>>> No need. I've already taken steps with Wikipedia that will
remove
>>>> the
>>>>>>> biographical sketch by my own request.
>>>>>>> The requests I get for this information are declining anyway,
and
>>>> our
>>>>>>> office can handle it here when and if needed.
>>>>>>> When the bio was uploaded to Wiki, I should have realized and
>> taken
>>>>>> into
>>>>>>> account Usenet nonsense.
>>>>>>> No biggie at all.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, someone added some nasty stuff to your Wiki page, eh?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>> No. Just have no need for it and it seems to bring put all the
kooks
>>>> to
>>>>> reference it for whatever the idiotic reasons are that motivate
>> them.
>>>>> :-))
>>>>>
>>>> Ah, OK. I thought it had to do with the k00k from texas.
>>>>
>>>> i wonder what buttman's wiki entry would look like?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>> Don't know. Each pilot has to make their own mark on the profession.
>>> Time has a way of sorting these things out for sure :-)
>>
>>
>> Hmmm.. I can only imagine how time will sort him out.
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> He and I don't seem to view flight instruction the same way. I guess
> time will sort out if one of us was wrong.
>

I think dying of old age is proof enough....


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

Buttman > wrote in news:fur1s6$vtp$1
@registered.motzarella.org:

> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:41:50 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
>>
>> Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation. The
>> quote you have presented here without the accompanying text that
>> completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked by
>> another poster. In other words, the information about the bio was NOT
>> used until it was mentioned negatively by someone else and in
response
>> to what was said.
>>
>
> And that changes things, how? One day someone accuses your article of
> being crap, you defend it. The next day someone else call it crap by
> flagging it, and now you inform the wikipedia admins that you agree it
> should be deleted?
>
>> As for my asking that the bio be deleted; that decision was made for
the
>> exact reasons given and has nothing whatsoever to do with Wikipedia.
>
> Oh, I see. Its just a coincidence that you decide to remove your self-
> written vanity article less than 12 hours after somebody with a
> roadrunner connection in El Paso (which may or may not be me) decides
to
> flag it as against the wikipedia guidelines.
>
>>
>> For your information, Wikipedia "deletes" thousands of files they
feel
>> are unnecessary and take up needed space on their site.
>
> Yeah, like your crap article.
>
>> Our decision to
>> add to the deletion process was simply offered to inform Wiki that we
>> understand the situation completely.
>
> "Our"? Oh please.
>
>>
>> God, what a small world you live in.
>
> Maybe one of these days you'll realize you're not as important as you
> think you are.
>


Maybe one of these days you'll realise that you aren;'t important at
all, to anyone.


Oh wait, you already do.


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

Larry Dighera > wrote in
:

> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:59:15 -0400, Dudley Henriques
> > wrote in
> >:
>
>>it seems to bring put all the kooks to
>>reference it for whatever the idiotic reasons are that motivate them.
>
> If you had bothered to remove the crosspost to kook newsgroups from
> your followup, you might see less of that sort of activity. Just a
> thought. :)

He meant you, netkkkop.

Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

gregvk > wrote in news:Xns9A8A98FD4C62E817AC3D8380227@
127.0.0.1:

> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in
> :
>
>> gregvk > wrote in
>> news:Xns9A8A85633D581E817AC3D8380227@ 127.0.0.1:
>>
>>> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in news:fuqkut$fcs$2
>>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>
>>>> buttman > wrote in news:c17c81d0-d051-4b54-ac65-
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 24, 12:00*am, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It shows up as
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hostname
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * * * cpe-72-191-163-46.elp.res.rr.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Geo-Location Information
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * * * Country * United States
>>>>>> * * * State/Region * * *TX
>>>>>> * * * City * * *El Paso
>>>>>> * * * Latitude *31.7958
>>>>>> * * * Longitude -106.3762
>>>>>> * * * Area Code 915
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh hey, El Paso, thats where I live, great town 8)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What a coincidence! You can help Dudley track the psycho down!
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>
>>> Here's a complete list of all the great stuff and fun things to do
in
>>> El Paso:
>>>
>>
>> Never been. Flew over it once. As near as I can tell, it;'s the
>> world's biggest trailer park.
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> You know how most cities are overall so-so, with one or two
> extraordinarily nice areas and one or two really ****ty areas? Well,
El
> Paso isn't like that. It's one huge ****ty area with maybe a couple
> really small so-so areas.
>

I'll take your word for it! I don't ever want to go there....


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

gregvk > wrote in news:Xns9A8A97BB3B3FEE817AC3D8380227
@127.0.0.1:

> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in
> :
>
>> Larry Dighera > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>> On 24 Apr 2008 19:06:48 GMT, gregvk > wrote in
>>> >:
>>>
>>>>Newsgroups:
>>>>
rec.aviation.piloting,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.v ampire.flonk.flonk.f
>>>>l onk
>>>
>>
>>
rec.aviation.piloting,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.v ampire.flonk.flonk.fl
>> onk
>>
>>
>> Awww, Larry, the Netkkkop is warning everyone of something, I
think...
>>
>> Bertie
>
> He's not "warning" anyone of anything they can't see for themselves.
He
> must think everyone is ****ing stupid.
>

To be fair, his own imagination is pretty limited, so it's
understandable.

Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

Jim Logajan > wrote in
:

> gregvk > wrote:
>> He's not "warning" anyone of anything they can't see for themselves.
>> He must think everyone is ****ing stupid.
>
> Sigh.
>
> He suspects that you are counting on a few people to overlook the
> change in the Newsgroups header. It happens not through stupidity but
> simple oversight. You know that and I know that and Larry knows that.
>
> I've seen it happen and have no doubt you have too. The classic trick
> used to be to add misc.test so that anyone responding who wasn't
> paying attention would get auto-responder e-mails they weren't
> expecting. But in an age of constant spam, that old trick is like
> spitting into the ocean. (Plus the number of autoresponders is down to
> one or two I think.)
>
> Say - you could always try to fight your own fights rather than trying
> to drag in hounds from other groups.

Moi? Fight? About what? BTW, are you confused about who you're talking
to or do you also think the the vamp is my sock?

BTW, nice try with the old froup snipping trick. That's very much
frowned on in my circles.


Bertie

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
> :
>
>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>> :
>>>
>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>>>> :
>>>>>
>>>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>>>>>> buttman > wrote in news:c17c81d0-d051-4b54-
>>> ac65-
>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 24, 12:00 am, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> It shows up as
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hostname
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> cpe-72-191-163-46.elp.res.rr.com
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Geo-Location Information
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Country United States
>>>>>>>>>>> State/Region TX
>>>>>>>>>>> City El Paso
>>>>>>>>>>> Latitude 31.7958
>>>>>>>>>>> Longitude -106.3762
>>>>>>>>>>> Area Code 915
>>>>>>>>>> Oh hey, El Paso, thats where I live, great town 8)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What a coincidence! You can help Dudley track the psycho down!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>>>> No need. I've already taken steps with Wikipedia that will
> remove
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> biographical sketch by my own request.
>>>>>>>> The requests I get for this information are declining anyway,
> and
>>>>> our
>>>>>>>> office can handle it here when and if needed.
>>>>>>>> When the bio was uploaded to Wiki, I should have realized and
>>> taken
>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>> account Usenet nonsense.
>>>>>>>> No biggie at all.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh, someone added some nasty stuff to your Wiki page, eh?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>> No. Just have no need for it and it seems to bring put all the
> kooks
>>>>> to
>>>>>> reference it for whatever the idiotic reasons are that motivate
>>> them.
>>>>>> :-))
>>>>>>
>>>>> Ah, OK. I thought it had to do with the k00k from texas.
>>>>>
>>>>> i wonder what buttman's wiki entry would look like?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bertie
>>>> Don't know. Each pilot has to make their own mark on the profession.
>>>> Time has a way of sorting these things out for sure :-)
>>>
>>> Hmmm.. I can only imagine how time will sort him out.
>>>
>>>
>>> Bertie
>> He and I don't seem to view flight instruction the same way. I guess
>> time will sort out if one of us was wrong.
>>
>
> I think dying of old age is proof enough....
>
>
> Bertie
I keep thinking that. I've somehow managed to get this far in one piece :-)
DH

[gatt[_3_]]

Buttman wrote:

> Yeah, like your crap article.
>
>> Our decision to
>> add to the deletion process was simply offered to inform Wiki that we
>> understand the situation completely.
>
> "Our"? Oh please.


I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue with
Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?

He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful toward my
IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no doubt
that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums because they've
said so.

I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?

-c
CP-ASEL-IA

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

Dudley Henriques > wrote in
:

> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>>>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> buttman > wrote in news:c17c81d0-d051-4b54-
>>>> ac65-
>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 24, 12:00 am, Nomen Nescio > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> It shows up as
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hostname
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> cpe-72-191-163-46.elp.res.rr.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Geo-Location Information
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Country United States
>>>>>>>>>>>> State/Region TX
>>>>>>>>>>>> City El Paso
>>>>>>>>>>>> Latitude 31.7958
>>>>>>>>>>>> Longitude -106.3762
>>>>>>>>>>>> Area Code 915
>>>>>>>>>>> Oh hey, El Paso, thats where I live, great town 8)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What a coincidence! You can help Dudley track the psycho
>>>>>>>>>> down!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>>>>> No need. I've already taken steps with Wikipedia that will
>> remove
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> biographical sketch by my own request.
>>>>>>>>> The requests I get for this information are declining anyway,
>> and
>>>>>> our
>>>>>>>>> office can handle it here when and if needed.
>>>>>>>>> When the bio was uploaded to Wiki, I should have realized and
>>>> taken
>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>> account Usenet nonsense.
>>>>>>>>> No biggie at all.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oh, someone added some nasty stuff to your Wiki page, eh?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>>> No. Just have no need for it and it seems to bring put all the
>> kooks
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> reference it for whatever the idiotic reasons are that motivate
>>>> them.
>>>>>>> :-))
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ah, OK. I thought it had to do with the k00k from texas.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i wonder what buttman's wiki entry would look like?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>> Don't know. Each pilot has to make their own mark on the
>>>>> profession. Time has a way of sorting these things out for sure
>>>>> :-)
>>>>
>>>> Hmmm.. I can only imagine how time will sort him out.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>> He and I don't seem to view flight instruction the same way. I guess
>>> time will sort out if one of us was wrong.
>>>
>>
>> I think dying of old age is proof enough....
>>
>>
>> Bertie
> I keep thinking that. I've somehow managed to get this far in one
> piece :-) DH


Exactly. Certainly luck plays a part, but ....


Bertie
>

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Buttman wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:41:50 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
>> Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation. The
>> quote you have presented here without the accompanying text that
>> completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked by
>> another poster. In other words, the information about the bio was NOT
>> used until it was mentioned negatively by someone else and in response
>> to what was said.
>>
>
> And that changes things, how? One day someone accuses your article of
> being crap, you defend it. The next day someone else call it crap by
> flagging it, and now you inform the wikipedia admins that you agree it
> should be deleted?

You CAN'T be this stupid! But.........:-) It should be obvious that as
far as Wikipedia is concerned, and a simple Google search confirms this
BTW, the article was listed yesterday by Wiki as a candidate for
deletion by them. This simple fact coupled with the idiotic posts made
here by you and Mxsmanic on this thread simply convinced me that it just
wasn't worth my time to defend the issue any longer.
Since the article isn't really needed any longer anyway, I went to the
site and added my name to what I assume was yours. It doesn't matter
really.
All you have succeeded in doing is to remind me the article is no longer
needed.
If you wish to consider this some sort of victory, please do so.
>
>> As for my asking that the bio be deleted; that decision was made for the
>> exact reasons given and has nothing whatsoever to do with Wikipedia.
>
> Oh, I see. Its just a coincidence that you decide to remove your self-
> written vanity article less than 12 hours after somebody with a
> roadrunner connection in El Paso (which may or may not be me) decides to
> flag it as against the wikipedia guidelines.

No, as I said, it was NOT coincidence. The "activity" here on the forum
coupled with realizing that the article was being used as a hammer as
you have done here simply keyed my actions to go to Wiki.
To tell you the truth, until Mxsmanic's post, I had virtually forgotten
the article was there. You can verify that by searching for the last
time I mentioned it on Usenet. In fact, I think I'm fairly safe in
telling you that what you will find are very few if any times I have
mentioned the Wiki article unless someone else mentioned it first; which
of course shoots a rather large hole in your "self importance" theory.
>
>> For your information, Wikipedia "deletes" thousands of files they feel
>> are unnecessary and take up needed space on their site.
>
> Yeah, like your crap article.

Unnecessary comment. Shows REAL agenda here. You REALLY need some
lessons in how to nail people. You're way too obvious with statements
like this one. It fairly shouts that you have "other issues" with the
person you're addressing. In my case, you seem to be harboring a bit of
issue over that run in we had a while back when I told you you were the
worst CFI I've ever encountered on Usenet. :-)
>
>> Our decision to
>> add to the deletion process was simply offered to inform Wiki that we
>> understand the situation completely.
>
> "Our"? Oh please.

Yes "Our". Explanation not necessary to you.
>
>> God, what a small world you live in.
>
> Maybe one of these days you'll realize you're not as important as you
> think you are.

I don't think on these terms. What YOU believe I think of myself isn't
necessarily what I DO think of myself......simply your opinion.

Sorry you see me this way, but it obviously can't be helped.
DH

[buttman]

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
>
> I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue with
> Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?

I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing an
IP have to do with piloting?

> He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful toward my
> IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no doubt
> that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums because they've
> said so.

I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence structures
and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really is,
but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's the
perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things in
the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.

I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake. He's
the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
Knievel).

People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them and
watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as a
vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that fill
my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.

>
> I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?
>
> -c
> CP-ASEL-IA

You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile posts?

[buttman]

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
>
> I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue with
> Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?

I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing an
IP have to do with piloting?

> He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful toward my
> IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no doubt
> that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums because they've
> said so.

I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence structures
and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really is,
but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's the
perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things in
the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.

I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake. He's
the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
Knievel).

People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them and
watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as a
vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that fill
my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.

>
> I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?
>
> -c
> CP-ASEL-IA

You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile posts?

[buttman]

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
>
> I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue with
> Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?

I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing an
IP have to do with piloting?

> He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful toward my
> IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no doubt
> that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums because they've
> said so.

I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence structures
and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really is,
but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's the
perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things in
the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.

I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake. He's
the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
Knievel).

People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them and
watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as a
vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that fill
my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.

>
> I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?
>
> -c
> CP-ASEL-IA

You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile posts?

[buttman]

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
>
> I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue with
> Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?

I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing an
IP have to do with piloting?

> He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful toward my
> IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no doubt
> that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums because they've
> said so.

I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence structures
and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really is,
but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's the
perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things in
the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.

I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake. He's
the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
Knievel).

People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them and
watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as a
vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that fill
my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.

>
> I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?
>
> -c
> CP-ASEL-IA

You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile posts?

[buttman]

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
>
> I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue with
> Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?

I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing an
IP have to do with piloting?

> He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful toward my
> IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no doubt
> that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums because they've
> said so.

I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence structures
and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really is,
but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's the
perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things in
the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.

I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake. He's
the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
Knievel).

People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them and
watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as a
vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that fill
my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.

>
> I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?
>
> -c
> CP-ASEL-IA

You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile posts?

[buttman]

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
>
> I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue with
> Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?

I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing an
IP have to do with piloting?

> He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful toward my
> IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no doubt
> that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums because they've
> said so.

I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence structures
and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really is,
but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's the
perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things in
the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.

I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake. He's
the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
Knievel).

People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them and
watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as a
vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that fill
my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.

>
> I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?
>
> -c
> CP-ASEL-IA

You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile posts?

[buttman]

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
>
> I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue with
> Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?

I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing an
IP have to do with piloting?

> He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful toward my
> IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no doubt
> that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums because they've
> said so.

I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence structures
and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really is,
but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's the
perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things in
the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.

I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake. He's
the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
Knievel).

People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them and
watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as a
vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that fill
my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.

>
> I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?
>
> -c
> CP-ASEL-IA

You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile posts?

[buttman]

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
>
> I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue with
> Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?

I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing an
IP have to do with piloting?

> He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful toward my
> IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no doubt
> that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums because they've
> said so.

I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence structures
and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really is,
but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's the
perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things in
the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.

I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake. He's
the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
Knievel).

People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them and
watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as a
vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that fill
my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.

>
> I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?
>
> -c
> CP-ASEL-IA

You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile posts?

[buttman]

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
>
> I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue with
> Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?

I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing an
IP have to do with piloting?

> He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful toward my
> IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no doubt
> that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums because they've
> said so.

I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence structures
and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really is,
but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's the
perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things in
the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.

I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake. He's
the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
Knievel).

People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them and
watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as a
vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that fill
my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.

>
> I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?
>
> -c
> CP-ASEL-IA

You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile posts?

[buttman]

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
>
> I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue with
> Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?

I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing an
IP have to do with piloting?

> He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful toward my
> IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no doubt
> that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums because they've
> said so.

I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence structures
and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really is,
but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's the
perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things in
the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.

I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake. He's
the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
Knievel).

People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them and
watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as a
vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that fill
my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.

>
> I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?
>
> -c
> CP-ASEL-IA

You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile posts?

[buttman]

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
>
> I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue with
> Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?

I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing an
IP have to do with piloting?

> He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful toward my
> IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no doubt
> that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums because they've
> said so.

I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence structures
and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really is,
but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's the
perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things in
the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.

I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake. He's
the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
Knievel).

People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them and
watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as a
vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that fill
my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.

>
> I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?
>
> -c
> CP-ASEL-IA

You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile posts?

[buttman]

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
>
> I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue with
> Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?

I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing an
IP have to do with piloting?

> He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful toward my
> IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no doubt
> that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums because they've
> said so.

I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence structures
and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really is,
but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's the
perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things in
the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.

I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake. He's
the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
Knievel).

People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them and
watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as a
vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that fill
my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.

>
> I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?
>
> -c
> CP-ASEL-IA

You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile posts?

[buttman]

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
>
> I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue with
> Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?

I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing an
IP have to do with piloting?

> He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful toward my
> IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no doubt
> that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums because they've
> said so.

I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence structures
and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really is,
but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's the
perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things in
the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.

I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake. He's
the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
Knievel).

People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them and
watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as a
vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that fill
my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.

>
> I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?
>
> -c
> CP-ASEL-IA

You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile posts?

[buttman]

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
>
> I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue with
> Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?

I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing an
IP have to do with piloting?

> He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful toward my
> IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no doubt
> that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums because they've
> said so.

I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence structures
and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really is,
but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's the
perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things in
the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.

I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake. He's
the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
Knievel).

People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them and
watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as a
vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that fill
my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.

>
> I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?
>
> -c
> CP-ASEL-IA

You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile posts?

[buttman]

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
>
> I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue with
> Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?

I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing an
IP have to do with piloting?

> He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful toward my
> IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no doubt
> that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums because they've
> said so.

I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence structures
and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really is,
but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's the
perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things in
the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.

I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake. He's
the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
Knievel).

People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them and
watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as a
vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that fill
my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.

>
> I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?
>
> -c
> CP-ASEL-IA

You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile posts?

[buttman]

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
>
> I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue with
> Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?

I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing an
IP have to do with piloting?

> He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful toward my
> IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no doubt
> that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums because they've
> said so.

I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence structures
and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really is,
but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's the
perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things in
the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.

I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake. He's
the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
Knievel).

People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them and
watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as a
vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that fill
my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.

>
> I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?
>
> -c
> CP-ASEL-IA

You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile posts?

[buttman]

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
>
> I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue with
> Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?

I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing an
IP have to do with piloting?

> He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful toward my
> IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no doubt
> that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums because they've
> said so.

I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence structures
and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really is,
but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's the
perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things in
the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.

I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake. He's
the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
Knievel).

People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them and
watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as a
vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that fill
my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.

>
> I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?
>
> -c
> CP-ASEL-IA

You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile posts?

[buttman]

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
>
> I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue with
> Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?

I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing an
IP have to do with piloting?

> He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful toward my
> IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no doubt
> that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums because they've
> said so.

I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence structures
and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really is,
but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's the
perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things in
the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.

I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake. He's
the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
Knievel).

People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them and
watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as a
vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that fill
my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.

>
> I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?
>
> -c
> CP-ASEL-IA

You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile posts?

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

Buttman > wrote in news:furbjr$88t$1
@registered.motzarella.org:

> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
>>
>> I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue with
>> Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?
>
> I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing an
> IP have to do with piloting?

Abourt as much as you do, anyway.


Bertie

[buttman]

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
>
> I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue with
> Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?

I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing an
IP have to do with piloting?

> He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful toward my
> IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no doubt
> that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums because they've
> said so.

I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence structures
and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really is,
but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's the
perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things in
the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.

I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake. He's
the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
Knievel).

People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them and
watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as a
vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that fill
my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.

>
> I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?
>
> -c
> CP-ASEL-IA

You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile posts?

[buttman]

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
>
> I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue with
> Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?

I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing an
IP have to do with piloting?

> He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful toward my
> IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no doubt
> that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums because they've
> said so.

I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence structures
and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really is,
but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's the
perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things in
the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.

I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake. He's
the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
Knievel).

People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them and
watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as a
vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that fill
my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.

>
> I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?
>
> -c
> CP-ASEL-IA

You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile posts?

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

gregvk > wrote in
:

> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in news:fur7sf$38u$4
> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
>> Jim Logajan > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>> gregvk > wrote:
>>>> He's not "warning" anyone of anything they can't see for
>>>> themselves. He must think everyone is ****ing stupid.
>>>
>>> Sigh.
>>>
>>> He suspects that you are counting on a few people to overlook the
>>> change in the Newsgroups header. It happens not through stupidity
>>> but simple oversight. You know that and I know that and Larry knows
>>> that.
>>>
>>> I've seen it happen and have no doubt you have too. The classic
>>> trick used to be to add misc.test so that anyone responding who
>>> wasn't paying attention would get auto-responder e-mails they
>>> weren't expecting. But in an age of constant spam, that old trick is
>>> like spitting into the ocean. (Plus the number of autoresponders is
>>> down to one or two I think.)
>>>
>>> Say - you could always try to fight your own fights rather than
>>> trying to drag in hounds from other groups.
>>
>> Moi? Fight? About what? BTW, are you confused about who you're
>> talking to or do you also think the the vamp is my sock?
>>
>> BTW, nice try with the old froup snipping trick. That's very much
>> frowned on in my circles.
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>>
>>
>
> What sort of monumental dumbass doesn't check the xpost before they
> send an article? Seriously, I've never even heard anyone suggest that
> before. Are there really people that dumb in this world? Wow. What
> a frightening idea.
>

Lots of 'em!

Even more amazing there are netkkops dumb enough to try and warn off
others....



Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

Dudley Henriques > wrote in
:

> Buttman wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:41:50 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
>>> Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation. The
>>> quote you have presented here without the accompanying text that
>>> completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked by
>>> another poster. In other words, the information about the bio was
>>> NOT used until it was mentioned negatively by someone else and in
>>> response to what was said.
>>>
>>
>> And that changes things, how? One day someone accuses your article of
>> being crap, you defend it. The next day someone else call it crap by
>> flagging it, and now you inform the wikipedia admins that you agree
>> it should be deleted?
>
> You CAN'T be this stupid!


You underestiamte him.

Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"



Bertie

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
> :
>
>> Buttman wrote:
>>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:41:50 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
>>>> Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation. The
>>>> quote you have presented here without the accompanying text that
>>>> completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked by
>>>> another poster. In other words, the information about the bio was
>>>> NOT used until it was mentioned negatively by someone else and in
>>>> response to what was said.
>>>>
>>> And that changes things, how? One day someone accuses your article of
>>> being crap, you defend it. The next day someone else call it crap by
>>> flagging it, and now you inform the wikipedia admins that you agree
>>> it should be deleted?
>> You CAN'T be this stupid!
>
>
> You underestiamte him.
>
> Bertie
>
You might be right.

I fear that "shutting down the engine on the student on takeoff by
shutting down the fuel selector" that he and I tangled on means we're
not going steady any longer :-))

D

[buttman]

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:15:58 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:

> Buttman wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:41:50 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
>>> Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation. The
>>> quote you have presented here without the accompanying text that
>>> completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked by
>>> another poster. In other words, the information about the bio was NOT
>>> used until it was mentioned negatively by someone else and in response
>>> to what was said.
>>>
>>>
>> And that changes things, how? One day someone accuses your article of
>> being crap, you defend it. The next day someone else call it crap by
>> flagging it, and now you inform the wikipedia admins that you agree it
>> should be deleted?
>
> You CAN'T be this stupid! But.........:-)

Unnecessary comment. Shows REAL agenda here. You REALLY need some
lessons in how to nail people. You're way too obvious with statements
like this one. It fairly shouts that you have "other issues" with the
person you're addressing. In my case, you seem to be harboring a bit of
issue over that run in we had a while back when I told you you were the
worst CFI I've ever encountered on Usenet. :-)

>It doesn't matter really.

Oh, no. It doesn't matter at all. *make a thread asking for help tracing
the IP of the person who deleted my wiki page*


> All you have succeeded in doing is to remind me the article is no longer
> needed.
> If you wish to consider this some sort of victory, please do so.
>>
>>> As for my asking that the bio be deleted; that decision was made for
>>> the exact reasons given and has nothing whatsoever to do with
>>> Wikipedia.
>>
>> Oh, I see. Its just a coincidence that you decide to remove your self-
>> written vanity article less than 12 hours after somebody with a
>> roadrunner connection in El Paso (which may or may not be me) decides
>> to flag it as against the wikipedia guidelines.
>
> No, as I said, it was NOT coincidence. The "activity" here on the forum
> coupled with realizing that the article was being used as a hammer as
> you have done here simply keyed my actions to go to Wiki. To tell you
> the truth, until Mxsmanic's post, I had virtually forgotten the article
> was there. You can verify that by searching for the last time I
> mentioned it on Usenet. In fact, I think I'm fairly safe in telling you
> that what you will find are very few if any times I have mentioned the
> Wiki article unless someone else mentioned it first; which of course
> shoots a rather large hole in your "self importance" theory.

It doesn't matter how many times you have mentioned it in the last year,
the point id you wrote your own damn wikipedia article. I find it funny
how you repeatedly can't grasp why this is so humorous to people my me
and apparently mxsmanic who see you as nothing but a parody of the kind
of person you claim to be.

It's especially funny because the article reads exactly like your posts
here. Nothing but half-assed claims of notoriety alongside substance-less
fluff all wrapped up in image-conscious tone.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

Dudley Henriques > wrote in news:5pOdnV-
:

> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>> Buttman wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:41:50 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
>>>>> Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation.
The
>>>>> quote you have presented here without the accompanying text that
>>>>> completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked by
>>>>> another poster. In other words, the information about the bio was
>>>>> NOT used until it was mentioned negatively by someone else and in
>>>>> response to what was said.
>>>>>
>>>> And that changes things, how? One day someone accuses your article
of
>>>> being crap, you defend it. The next day someone else call it crap
by
>>>> flagging it, and now you inform the wikipedia admins that you agree
>>>> it should be deleted?
>>> You CAN'T be this stupid!
>>
>>
>> You underestiamte him.
>>
>> Bertie
>>
> You might be right.
>
> I fear that "shutting down the engine on the student on takeoff by
> shutting down the fuel selector" that he and I tangled on means we're
> not going steady any longer :-))
>

As you know, I'm all for a creative approach to instructing, but WTF is
that supposed to teach anyone? Leaving aside he fact that it's gaurnteed
to eventually end up in a wreck...


bertie


Bertie

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
> You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"
>
>
>
> Bertie

I think it's anger :-)) He wants to make sure EVERYBODY notices it :-))
D

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

Buttman > wrote in
:

> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:15:58 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
>
>> Buttman wrote:
>>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:41:50 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
>>>> Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation.
>>>> The quote you have presented here without the accompanying text
>>>> that completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked
>>>> by another poster. In other words, the information about the bio
>>>> was NOT used until it was mentioned negatively by someone else and
>>>> in response to what was said.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> And that changes things, how? One day someone accuses your article
>>> of being crap, you defend it. The next day someone else call it crap
>>> by flagging it, and now you inform the wikipedia admins that you
>>> agree it should be deleted?
>>
>> You CAN'T be this stupid! But.........:-)
>
> Unnecessary comment. Shows REAL agenda here. You REALLY need some
> lessons in how to nail people.


Who the **** would want to nail you? Your head on my trophy wall would
look rather insignificant.


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

Buttman > wrote in news:furcr6$cs2$2
@registered.motzarella.org:

> On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 01:31:00 +0000, Buttman sayeth:
>
>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
>>>
>>> I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue
with
>>> Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?
>>
>> I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing
an
>> IP have to do with piloting?
>>
>>> He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful
toward
>>> my IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no
>>> doubt that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums
because
>>> they've said so.
>>
>> I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
>> liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence
structures
>> and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really
is,
>> but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's
the
>> perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things
in
>> the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.
>>
>> I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake.
He's
>> the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
>> build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
>> Knievel).
>>
>> People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them
and
>> watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as
a
>> vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that
fill
>> my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
>> story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
>> should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
>> anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.
>>
>>
>>> I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?
>>>
>>> -c
>>> CP-ASEL-IA
>>
>> You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile
posts?
>
> I don't know if this is showing up more than once, but I only meant to
> send it once
>


We understand. it;'s the jerking off thing.

Bertie

[buttman]

On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 01:31:00 +0000, Buttman sayeth:

> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
>>
>> I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue with
>> Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?
>
> I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing an
> IP have to do with piloting?
>
>> He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful toward
>> my IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no
>> doubt that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums because
>> they've said so.
>
> I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
> liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence structures
> and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really is,
> but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's the
> perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things in
> the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.
>
> I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake. He's
> the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
> build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
> Knievel).
>
> People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them and
> watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as a
> vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that fill
> my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
> story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
> should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
> anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.
>
>
>> I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?
>>
>> -c
>> CP-ASEL-IA
>
> You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile posts?

I don't know if this is showing up more than once, but I only meant to
send it once

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

Dudley Henriques > wrote in
:

> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>> You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"
>>
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> I think it's anger :-)) He wants to make sure EVERYBODY notices it :-))
> D
>

that can be arranged!

Bertie

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Buttman wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 01:31:00 +0000, Buttman sayeth:
>
>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
>>> I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue with
>>> Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?
>> I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing an
>> IP have to do with piloting?
>>
>>> He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful toward
>>> my IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no
>>> doubt that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums because
>>> they've said so.
>> I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
>> liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence structures
>> and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really is,
>> but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's the
>> perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things in
>> the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.
>>
>> I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake. He's
>> the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
>> build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
>> Knievel).
>>
>> People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them and
>> watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as a
>> vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that fill
>> my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
>> story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
>> should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
>> anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.
>>
>>
>>> I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?
>>>
>>> -c
>>> CP-ASEL-IA
>> You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile posts?
>
> I don't know if this is showing up more than once, but I only meant to
> send it once

A hand this nervous should be REAL careful shutting down a fuel selector
on takeoff with his student don't you think? :-)
DH

[BT]

it hit mine spot on

"Jay Maynard" > wrote in message
...
> On 2008-04-24, Jim Logajan > wrote:
>> Nomen Nescio > wrote:
>>> http://whatismyipaddress.com/
>> I'll try to remember that web site - though it places my own IP address
>> in
>> Eugene Oregon - about 20 miles from where I really live.
>
> It places me in Minneapolis, about 125 miles wrong.
> --
> Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com
> http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net
> Fairmont, MN (FRM) (Yes, that's me!)
> AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC (ordered 17 March, delivery 2 June)

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Buttman wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:15:58 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
>
>> Buttman wrote:
>>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:41:50 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
>>>> Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation. The
>>>> quote you have presented here without the accompanying text that
>>>> completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked by
>>>> another poster. In other words, the information about the bio was NOT
>>>> used until it was mentioned negatively by someone else and in response
>>>> to what was said.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> And that changes things, how? One day someone accuses your article of
>>> being crap, you defend it. The next day someone else call it crap by
>>> flagging it, and now you inform the wikipedia admins that you agree it
>>> should be deleted?
>> You CAN'T be this stupid! But.........:-)
>
> Unnecessary comment. Shows REAL agenda here. You REALLY need some
> lessons in how to nail people. You're way too obvious with statements
> like this one. It fairly shouts that you have "other issues" with the
> person you're addressing. In my case, you seem to be harboring a bit of
> issue over that run in we had a while back when I told you you were the
> worst CFI I've ever encountered on Usenet. :-)
>
>> It doesn't matter really.
>
> Oh, no. It doesn't matter at all. *make a thread asking for help tracing
> the IP of the person who deleted my wiki page*
>
>
>> All you have succeeded in doing is to remind me the article is no longer
>> needed.
>> If you wish to consider this some sort of victory, please do so.
>>>> As for my asking that the bio be deleted; that decision was made for
>>>> the exact reasons given and has nothing whatsoever to do with
>>>> Wikipedia.
>>> Oh, I see. Its just a coincidence that you decide to remove your self-
>>> written vanity article less than 12 hours after somebody with a
>>> roadrunner connection in El Paso (which may or may not be me) decides
>>> to flag it as against the wikipedia guidelines.
>> No, as I said, it was NOT coincidence. The "activity" here on the forum
>> coupled with realizing that the article was being used as a hammer as
>> you have done here simply keyed my actions to go to Wiki. To tell you
>> the truth, until Mxsmanic's post, I had virtually forgotten the article
>> was there. You can verify that by searching for the last time I
>> mentioned it on Usenet. In fact, I think I'm fairly safe in telling you
>> that what you will find are very few if any times I have mentioned the
>> Wiki article unless someone else mentioned it first; which of course
>> shoots a rather large hole in your "self importance" theory.
>
> It doesn't matter how many times you have mentioned it in the last year,
> the point id you wrote your own damn wikipedia article. I find it funny
> how you repeatedly can't grasp why this is so humorous to people my me
> and apparently mxsmanic who see you as nothing but a parody of the kind
> of person you claim to be.
>
> It's especially funny because the article reads exactly like your posts
> here. Nothing but half-assed claims of notoriety alongside substance-less
> fluff all wrapped up in image-conscious tone.

Whatever. I should point out however that fortunately for me, you and
Mxsmanic seem to be fairly alone with all this bull ****.

Personally, my main interest in you is that you claim to be an
instructor who has shut down a fuel selector valve on a student to
"teach him" about engine failures on takeoff.

Apparently you and I will be meeting fairly regularly on these forums as
you post concerning flight instruction. Any "disagreement" we might have
will I'm sure be judged by others for any missing accuracy or attempts
at "self importance". That seems fair enough to me.
I believe I'll just go with that :-)
DH

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
> :
>
>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>> You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Bertie
>> I think it's anger :-)) He wants to make sure EVERYBODY notices it :-))
>> D
>>
>
> that can be arranged!
>
> Bertie
>

He IS a real trip isn't he? Oh well...goes with Usenet I guess. :-)
D

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
> Buttman > wrote in news:furcr6$cs2$2
> @registered.motzarella.org:
>
>> On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 01:31:00 +0000, Buttman sayeth:
>>
>>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
>>>> I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue
> with
>>>> Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?
>>> I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing
> an
>>> IP have to do with piloting?
>>>
>>>> He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful
> toward
>>>> my IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no
>>>> doubt that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums
> because
>>>> they've said so.
>>> I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
>>> liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence
> structures
>>> and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really
> is,
>>> but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's
> the
>>> perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things
> in
>>> the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.
>>>
>>> I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake.
> He's
>>> the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
>>> build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
>>> Knievel).
>>>
>>> People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them
> and
>>> watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as
> a
>>> vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that
> fill
>>> my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
>>> story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
>>> should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
>>> anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.
>>>
>>>
>>>> I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?
>>>>
>>>> -c
>>>> CP-ASEL-IA
>>> You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile
> posts?
>> I don't know if this is showing up more than once, but I only meant to
>> send it once
>>
>
>
> We understand. it;'s the jerking off thing.
>
> Bertie

At least he seems to have the situation well in hand :-)
D

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

Dudley Henriques > wrote in
:

> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>> You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>> I think it's anger :-)) He wants to make sure EVERYBODY notices it
:-))
>>> D
>>>
>>
>> that can be arranged!
>>
>> Bertie
>>
>
> He IS a real trip isn't he? Oh well...goes with Usenet I guess. :-)

It's what i like about it best..He's entertaining, but not especially
so. He's definitely kicking it up a notch with this latest ****, ghough.


Bertie
>

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

Dudley Henriques > wrote in news:7eWdnWwrDr-
:

> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>> Buttman > wrote in news:furcr6$cs2$2
>> @registered.motzarella.org:
>>
>>> On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 01:31:00 +0000, Buttman sayeth:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
>>>>> I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue
>> with
>>>>> Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?
>>>> I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does
tracing
>> an
>>>> IP have to do with piloting?
>>>>
>>>>> He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful
>> toward
>>>>> my IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have
no
>>>>> doubt that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums
>> because
>>>>> they've said so.
>>>> I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless
one
>>>> liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence
>> structures
>>>> and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really
>> is,
>>>> but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious.
He's
>> the
>>>> perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things
>> in
>>>> the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.
>>>>
>>>> I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake.
>> He's
>>>> the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a
monument
>>>> build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
>>>> Knievel).
>>>>
>>>> People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them
>> and
>>>> watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it
as
>> a
>>>> vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that
>> fill
>>>> my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
>>>> story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks
it
>>>> should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
>>>> anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?
>>>>>
>>>>> -c
>>>>> CP-ASEL-IA
>>>> You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile
>> posts?
>>> I don't know if this is showing up more than once, but I only meant
to
>>> send it once
>>>
>>
>>
>> We understand. it;'s the jerking off thing.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> At least he seems to have the situation well in hand :-)
> D
>

Groan!

Oops!

Bertie

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
> :
>
>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>> :
>>>
>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>> You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bertie
>>>> I think it's anger :-)) He wants to make sure EVERYBODY notices it
> :-))
>>>> D
>>>>
>>> that can be arranged!
>>>
>>> Bertie
>>>
>> He IS a real trip isn't he? Oh well...goes with Usenet I guess. :-)
>
> It's what i like about it best..He's entertaining, but not especially
> so. He's definitely kicking it up a notch with this latest ****, ghough.
>
>
> Bertie
>

Expected. He's been chaffing at the bit since the "fuel starvation on
takeoff" thread. When people like him get nailed, they strike back at
the hammer. No big fuss. They attack where they think they see
vulnerability, in my case, my having been around since the dinosaurs
equates to my "self importance".
What's really tragic about guys like this is that instead of sitting
back and learning something (not only from me, but from others with
experience as well) they miss the resources available to them.
In this case, he sees the fact that I see myself as a resource for him
as an expression of self importance. Sad!
Part of it's my fault for sure. I really jumped on his ass about that
pulling the fuel valve bit he did on a student. I should have approached
him differently. Nobody likes to be told they're flat wrong, especially
on a public forum.
I might have helped him instead of ****ing him off like I did.
Oh well........maybe he's right about one thing. Years ago I wouldn't
have made that mistake :-)


--
Dudley

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

Dudley Henriques > wrote in
:

> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>>> You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>> I think it's anger :-)) He wants to make sure EVERYBODY notices it
>> :-))
>>>>> D
>>>>>
>>>> that can be arranged!
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>>
>>> He IS a real trip isn't he? Oh well...goes with Usenet I guess. :-)
>>
>> It's what i like about it best..He's entertaining, but not especially
>> so. He's definitely kicking it up a notch with this latest ****,
>> ghough.
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>>
>
> Expected. He's been chaffing at the bit since the "fuel starvation on
> takeoff" thread. When people like him get nailed, they strike back at
> the hammer. No big fuss. They attack where they think they see
> vulnerability, in my case, my having been around since the dinosaurs
> equates to my "self importance".
> What's really tragic about guys like this is that instead of sitting
> back and learning something (not only from me, but from others with
> experience as well) they miss the resources available to them.
> In this case, he sees the fact that I see myself as a resource for him
> as an expression of self importance. Sad!
> Part of it's my fault for sure. I really jumped on his ass about that
> pulling the fuel valve bit he did on a student. I should have
> approached him differently. Nobody likes to be told they're flat
> wrong, especially on a public forum.
> I might have helped him instead of ****ing him off like I did.
> Oh well........maybe he's right about one thing. Years ago I wouldn't
> have made that mistake :-)


Mmm, I kinda doubt you could have helped him. He's shown what he is
clearly at this stage and "learner" doesn;'t seem to be part of his
makeup in any way shape or form.



Bertie

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
> :
>
>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>> :
>>>
>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>>>> :
>>>>>
>>>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>>>> You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>> I think it's anger :-)) He wants to make sure EVERYBODY notices it
>>> :-))
>>>>>> D
>>>>>>
>>>>> that can be arranged!
>>>>>
>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>
>>>> He IS a real trip isn't he? Oh well...goes with Usenet I guess. :-)
>>> It's what i like about it best..He's entertaining, but not especially
>>> so. He's definitely kicking it up a notch with this latest ****,
>>> ghough.
>>>
>>>
>>> Bertie
>>>
>> Expected. He's been chaffing at the bit since the "fuel starvation on
>> takeoff" thread. When people like him get nailed, they strike back at
>> the hammer. No big fuss. They attack where they think they see
>> vulnerability, in my case, my having been around since the dinosaurs
>> equates to my "self importance".
>> What's really tragic about guys like this is that instead of sitting
>> back and learning something (not only from me, but from others with
>> experience as well) they miss the resources available to them.
>> In this case, he sees the fact that I see myself as a resource for him
>> as an expression of self importance. Sad!
>> Part of it's my fault for sure. I really jumped on his ass about that
>> pulling the fuel valve bit he did on a student. I should have
>> approached him differently. Nobody likes to be told they're flat
>> wrong, especially on a public forum.
>> I might have helped him instead of ****ing him off like I did.
>> Oh well........maybe he's right about one thing. Years ago I wouldn't
>> have made that mistake :-)
>
>
> Mmm, I kinda doubt you could have helped him. He's shown what he is
> clearly at this stage and "learner" doesn;'t seem to be part of his
> makeup in any way shape or form.
>
>
>
> Bertie
>
Could be right at that. Certainly a consideration.

--
Dudley Henriques

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
...
> Buttman wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:06:39 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
>>
>>> No need. I've already taken steps with Wikipedia that will remove the
>>> biographical sketch by my own request. The requests I get for this
>>> information are declining anyway, and our office can handle it here when
>>> and if needed. When the bio was uploaded to Wiki, I should have realized
>>> and taken into account Usenet nonsense.
>>> No biggie at all.
>>
>> Funny, as just yesterday you were defending the page, saying it was
>> "frequently" needed:
>>
>> "Just to enlighten you, I serve an many real world aviation safety think
>> tanks where requests for a bio are frequently asked for. The wiki page
>> simply makes it easier for interested people to access requested
>> information."
>>
>> Now that the wikipedia admins are deleting it, you're now saying the page
>> is not needed?
>
> Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation.
> The quote you have presented here without the accompanying text that
> completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked by another
> poster. In other words, the information about the bio was NOT used until
> it was mentioned negatively by someone else and in response to what was
> said.
>
> As for my asking that the bio be deleted; that decision was made for the
> exact reasons given and has nothing whatsoever to do with Wikipedia.
>
> For your information, Wikipedia "deletes" thousands of files they feel are
> unnecessary and take up needed space on their site. Our decision to add to
> the deletion process was simply offered to inform Wiki that we understand
> the situation completely.
>
> God, what a small world you live in.
>
>
> --
> Dudley Henriques

Ok fine, prove the man wrong. Leave it up for another 30 or 45 days. That'll
show'em.

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
...
> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>> You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>> I think it's anger :-)) He wants to make sure EVERYBODY notices it :-))
>>> D
>>>
>>
>> that can be arranged! Bertie
>>
>
> He IS a real trip isn't he? Oh well...goes with Usenet I guess. :-)
> D

Damn Dumley, you and Bertie are going to have to stop these circle jerks.
They're just way too obvious.

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
...
> Buttman wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:41:50 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
>>> Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation. The
>>> quote you have presented here without the accompanying text that
>>> completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked by
>>> another poster. In other words, the information about the bio was NOT
>>> used until it was mentioned negatively by someone else and in response
>>> to what was said.
>>>
>>
>> And that changes things, how? One day someone accuses your article of
>> being crap, you defend it. The next day someone else call it crap by
>> flagging it, and now you inform the wikipedia admins that you agree it
>> should be deleted?
>
> You CAN'T be this stupid! But.........:-) It should be obvious that as far
> as Wikipedia is concerned, and a simple Google search confirms this BTW,
> the article was listed yesterday by Wiki as a candidate for deletion by
> them. This simple fact coupled with the idiotic posts made here by you and
> Mxsmanic on this thread simply convinced me that it just wasn't worth my
> time to defend the issue any longer.
> Since the article isn't really needed any longer anyway, I went to the
> site and added my name to what I assume was yours. It doesn't matter
> really.
> All you have succeeded in doing is to remind me the article is no longer
> needed.
> If you wish to consider this some sort of victory, please do so.
>>
>>> As for my asking that the bio be deleted; that decision was made for the
>>> exact reasons given and has nothing whatsoever to do with Wikipedia.
>>
>> Oh, I see. Its just a coincidence that you decide to remove your self-
>> written vanity article less than 12 hours after somebody with a
>> roadrunner connection in El Paso (which may or may not be me) decides to
>> flag it as against the wikipedia guidelines.
>
> No, as I said, it was NOT coincidence. The "activity" here on the forum
> coupled with realizing that the article was being used as a hammer as you
> have done here simply keyed my actions to go to Wiki.
> To tell you the truth, until Mxsmanic's post, I had virtually forgotten
> the article was there. You can verify that by searching for the last time
> I mentioned it on Usenet. In fact, I think I'm fairly safe in telling you
> that what you will find are very few if any times I have mentioned the
> Wiki article unless someone else mentioned it first; which of course
> shoots a rather large hole in your "self importance" theory.
>>
>>> For your information, Wikipedia "deletes" thousands of files they feel
>>> are unnecessary and take up needed space on their site.
>>
>> Yeah, like your crap article.
>
> Unnecessary comment. Shows REAL agenda here. You REALLY need some lessons
> in how to nail people. You're way too obvious with statements like this
> one. It fairly shouts that you have "other issues" with the person you're
> addressing. In my case, you seem to be harboring a bit of issue over that
> run in we had a while back when I told you you were the worst CFI I've
> ever encountered on Usenet. :-)
>>
>>> Our decision to
>>> add to the deletion process was simply offered to inform Wiki that we
>>> understand the situation completely.
>>
>> "Our"? Oh please.
>
> Yes "Our". Explanation not necessary to you.
>>
>>> God, what a small world you live in.
>>
>> Maybe one of these days you'll realize you're not as important as you
>> think you are.
>
> I don't think on these terms. What YOU believe I think of myself isn't
> necessarily what I DO think of myself......simply your opinion.
>
> Sorry you see me this way, but it obviously can't be helped.
> DH

Bull****. You're finally taking it down because the world is making you deal
with how lame it makes you look.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

Dudley Henriques > wrote in
:

> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>>>>> You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>>> I think it's anger :-)) He wants to make sure EVERYBODY notices
it
>>>> :-))
>>>>>>> D
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> that can be arranged!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>>
>>>>> He IS a real trip isn't he? Oh well...goes with Usenet I guess.
:-)
>>>> It's what i like about it best..He's entertaining, but not
especially
>>>> so. He's definitely kicking it up a notch with this latest ****,
>>>> ghough.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>>
>>> Expected. He's been chaffing at the bit since the "fuel starvation
on
>>> takeoff" thread. When people like him get nailed, they strike back
at
>>> the hammer. No big fuss. They attack where they think they see
>>> vulnerability, in my case, my having been around since the dinosaurs
>>> equates to my "self importance".
>>> What's really tragic about guys like this is that instead of sitting
>>> back and learning something (not only from me, but from others with
>>> experience as well) they miss the resources available to them.
>>> In this case, he sees the fact that I see myself as a resource for
him
>>> as an expression of self importance. Sad!
>>> Part of it's my fault for sure. I really jumped on his ass about
that
>>> pulling the fuel valve bit he did on a student. I should have
>>> approached him differently. Nobody likes to be told they're flat
>>> wrong, especially on a public forum.
>>> I might have helped him instead of ****ing him off like I did.
>>> Oh well........maybe he's right about one thing. Years ago I
wouldn't
>>> have made that mistake :-)
>>
>>
>> Mmm, I kinda doubt you could have helped him. He's shown what he is
>> clearly at this stage and "learner" doesn;'t seem to be part of his
>> makeup in any way shape or form.
>>
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>>
> Could be right at that. Certainly a consideration.
>

Well, as evidence I offer up the fact that he keeps coming back to me
for more abuse...


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
:

>
> "Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>> :
>>>
>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>> You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bertie
>>>> I think it's anger :-)) He wants to make sure EVERYBODY notices it
>>>> :-)) D
>>>>
>>>
>>> that can be arranged! Bertie
>>>
>>
>> He IS a real trip isn't he? Oh well...goes with Usenet I guess. :-)
>> D
>
> Damn Dumley, you and Bertie are going to have to stop these circle
> jerks. They're just way too obvious.
>

Yeh, right k00kie boi.


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
:

>
> "Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Buttman wrote:
>>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:06:39 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
>>>
>>>> No need. I've already taken steps with Wikipedia that will remove
>>>> the biographical sketch by my own request. The requests I get for
>>>> this information are declining anyway, and our office can handle it
>>>> here when and if needed. When the bio was uploaded to Wiki, I
>>>> should have realized and taken into account Usenet nonsense.
>>>> No biggie at all.
>>>
>>> Funny, as just yesterday you were defending the page, saying it was
>>> "frequently" needed:
>>>
>>> "Just to enlighten you, I serve an many real world aviation safety
>>> think tanks where requests for a bio are frequently asked for. The
>>> wiki page simply makes it easier for interested people to access
>>> requested information."
>>>
>>> Now that the wikipedia admins are deleting it, you're now saying the
>>> page is not needed?
>>
>> Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation.
>> The quote you have presented here without the accompanying text that
>> completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked by
>> another poster. In other words, the information about the bio was NOT
>> used until it was mentioned negatively by someone else and in
>> response to what was said.
>>
>> As for my asking that the bio be deleted; that decision was made for
>> the exact reasons given and has nothing whatsoever to do with
>> Wikipedia.
>>
>> For your information, Wikipedia "deletes" thousands of files they
>> feel are unnecessary and take up needed space on their site. Our
>> decision to add to the deletion process was simply offered to inform
>> Wiki that we understand the situation completely.
>>
>> God, what a small world you live in.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dudley Henriques
>
> Ok fine, prove the man wrong. Leave it up for another 30 or 45 days.
> That'll show'em.


Whoosh.


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
:

>
> "Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Buttman wrote:
>>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:41:50 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
>>>> Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation.
>>>> The quote you have presented here without the accompanying text
>>>> that completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked
>>>> by another poster. In other words, the information about the bio
>>>> was NOT used until it was mentioned negatively by someone else and
>>>> in response to what was said.
>>>>
>>>
>>> And that changes things, how? One day someone accuses your article
>>> of being crap, you defend it. The next day someone else call it crap
>>> by flagging it, and now you inform the wikipedia admins that you
>>> agree it should be deleted?
>>
>> You CAN'T be this stupid! But.........:-) It should be obvious that
>> as far as Wikipedia is concerned, and a simple Google search confirms
>> this BTW, the article was listed yesterday by Wiki as a candidate for
>> deletion by them. This simple fact coupled with the idiotic posts
>> made here by you and Mxsmanic on this thread simply convinced me that
>> it just wasn't worth my time to defend the issue any longer.
>> Since the article isn't really needed any longer anyway, I went to
>> the site and added my name to what I assume was yours. It doesn't
>> matter really.
>> All you have succeeded in doing is to remind me the article is no
>> longer needed.
>> If you wish to consider this some sort of victory, please do so.
>>>
>>>> As for my asking that the bio be deleted; that decision was made
>>>> for the exact reasons given and has nothing whatsoever to do with
>>>> Wikipedia.
>>>
>>> Oh, I see. Its just a coincidence that you decide to remove your
>>> self- written vanity article less than 12 hours after somebody with
>>> a roadrunner connection in El Paso (which may or may not be me)
>>> decides to flag it as against the wikipedia guidelines.
>>
>> No, as I said, it was NOT coincidence. The "activity" here on the
>> forum coupled with realizing that the article was being used as a
>> hammer as you have done here simply keyed my actions to go to Wiki.
>> To tell you the truth, until Mxsmanic's post, I had virtually
>> forgotten the article was there. You can verify that by searching for
>> the last time I mentioned it on Usenet. In fact, I think I'm fairly
>> safe in telling you that what you will find are very few if any times
>> I have mentioned the Wiki article unless someone else mentioned it
>> first; which of course shoots a rather large hole in your "self
>> importance" theory.
>>>
>>>> For your information, Wikipedia "deletes" thousands of files they
>>>> feel are unnecessary and take up needed space on their site.
>>>
>>> Yeah, like your crap article.
>>
>> Unnecessary comment. Shows REAL agenda here. You REALLY need some
>> lessons in how to nail people. You're way too obvious with statements
>> like this one. It fairly shouts that you have "other issues" with the
>> person you're addressing. In my case, you seem to be harboring a bit
>> of issue over that run in we had a while back when I told you you
>> were the worst CFI I've ever encountered on Usenet. :-)
>>>
>>>> Our decision to
>>>> add to the deletion process was simply offered to inform Wiki that
>>>> we understand the situation completely.
>>>
>>> "Our"? Oh please.
>>
>> Yes "Our". Explanation not necessary to you.
>>>
>>>> God, what a small world you live in.
>>>
>>> Maybe one of these days you'll realize you're not as important as
>>> you think you are.
>>
>> I don't think on these terms. What YOU believe I think of myself
>> isn't necessarily what I DO think of myself......simply your opinion.
>>
>> Sorry you see me this way, but it obviously can't be helped.
>> DH
>
> Bull****. You're finally taking it down because the world is making
> you deal with how lame it makes you look.


Do tell, how does that work exactly, wannabe boi?


Bertie

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Maxwell wrote:
> "Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Buttman wrote:
>>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:41:50 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
>>>> Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation. The
>>>> quote you have presented here without the accompanying text that
>>>> completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked by
>>>> another poster. In other words, the information about the bio was NOT
>>>> used until it was mentioned negatively by someone else and in response
>>>> to what was said.
>>>>
>>> And that changes things, how? One day someone accuses your article of
>>> being crap, you defend it. The next day someone else call it crap by
>>> flagging it, and now you inform the wikipedia admins that you agree it
>>> should be deleted?
>> You CAN'T be this stupid! But.........:-) It should be obvious that as far
>> as Wikipedia is concerned, and a simple Google search confirms this BTW,
>> the article was listed yesterday by Wiki as a candidate for deletion by
>> them. This simple fact coupled with the idiotic posts made here by you and
>> Mxsmanic on this thread simply convinced me that it just wasn't worth my
>> time to defend the issue any longer.
>> Since the article isn't really needed any longer anyway, I went to the
>> site and added my name to what I assume was yours. It doesn't matter
>> really.
>> All you have succeeded in doing is to remind me the article is no longer
>> needed.
>> If you wish to consider this some sort of victory, please do so.
>>>> As for my asking that the bio be deleted; that decision was made for the
>>>> exact reasons given and has nothing whatsoever to do with Wikipedia.
>>> Oh, I see. Its just a coincidence that you decide to remove your self-
>>> written vanity article less than 12 hours after somebody with a
>>> roadrunner connection in El Paso (which may or may not be me) decides to
>>> flag it as against the wikipedia guidelines.
>> No, as I said, it was NOT coincidence. The "activity" here on the forum
>> coupled with realizing that the article was being used as a hammer as you
>> have done here simply keyed my actions to go to Wiki.
>> To tell you the truth, until Mxsmanic's post, I had virtually forgotten
>> the article was there. You can verify that by searching for the last time
>> I mentioned it on Usenet. In fact, I think I'm fairly safe in telling you
>> that what you will find are very few if any times I have mentioned the
>> Wiki article unless someone else mentioned it first; which of course
>> shoots a rather large hole in your "self importance" theory.
>>>> For your information, Wikipedia "deletes" thousands of files they feel
>>>> are unnecessary and take up needed space on their site.
>>> Yeah, like your crap article.
>> Unnecessary comment. Shows REAL agenda here. You REALLY need some lessons
>> in how to nail people. You're way too obvious with statements like this
>> one. It fairly shouts that you have "other issues" with the person you're
>> addressing. In my case, you seem to be harboring a bit of issue over that
>> run in we had a while back when I told you you were the worst CFI I've
>> ever encountered on Usenet. :-)
>>>> Our decision to
>>>> add to the deletion process was simply offered to inform Wiki that we
>>>> understand the situation completely.
>>> "Our"? Oh please.
>> Yes "Our". Explanation not necessary to you.
>>>> God, what a small world you live in.
>>> Maybe one of these days you'll realize you're not as important as you
>>> think you are.
>> I don't think on these terms. What YOU believe I think of myself isn't
>> necessarily what I DO think of myself......simply your opinion.
>>
>> Sorry you see me this way, but it obviously can't be helped.
>> DH
>
> Bull****. You're finally taking it down because the world is making you deal
> with how lame it makes you look.
>
>
>
Right! :-)) Dream on.

--
Dudley Henriques

[buttman]

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:35:00 -0500, Maxwell sayeth:

> "Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>> :
>>>
>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>> You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bertie
>>>> I think it's anger :-)) He wants to make sure EVERYBODY notices it
>>>> :-)) D
>>>>
>>>>
>>> that can be arranged! Bertie
>>>
>>>
>> He IS a real trip isn't he? Oh well...goes with Usenet I guess. :-) D
>
> Damn Dumley, you and Bertie are going to have to stop these circle
> jerks. They're just way too obvious.

Its pathetic isn't it. Pity my news reader had to burp like that, he
would have had to answer to the accusations. Now he gets a convenient
out...

[buttman]

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:13:29 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:

> Expected. He's been chaffing at the bit since the "fuel starvation on
> takeoff" thread. When people like him get nailed, they strike back at
> the hammer. No big fuss. They attack where they think they see
> vulnerability, in my case, my having been around since the dinosaurs
> equates to my "self importance".
> What's really tragic about guys like this is that instead of sitting
> back and learning something (not only from me, but from others with
> experience as well) they miss the resources available to them. In this
> case, he sees the fact that I see myself as a resource for him as an
> expression of self importance. Sad! Part of it's my fault for sure. I
> really jumped on his ass about that pulling the fuel valve bit he did on
> a student. I should have approached him differently. Nobody likes to be
> told they're flat wrong, especially on a public forum.
> I might have helped him instead of ****ing him off like I did. Oh
> well........maybe he's right about one thing. Years ago I wouldn't have
> made that mistake :-)

keep telling yourself that, if it makes you feel more relevant.

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
> :
>
>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>> :
>>>
>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>>>> :
>>>>>
>>>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>>>>>> You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>>>> I think it's anger :-)) He wants to make sure EVERYBODY notices
> it
>>>>> :-))
>>>>>>>> D
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> that can be arranged!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> He IS a real trip isn't he? Oh well...goes with Usenet I guess.
> :-)
>>>>> It's what i like about it best..He's entertaining, but not
> especially
>>>>> so. He's definitely kicking it up a notch with this latest ****,
>>>>> ghough.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>
>>>> Expected. He's been chaffing at the bit since the "fuel starvation
> on
>>>> takeoff" thread. When people like him get nailed, they strike back
> at
>>>> the hammer. No big fuss. They attack where they think they see
>>>> vulnerability, in my case, my having been around since the dinosaurs
>>>> equates to my "self importance".
>>>> What's really tragic about guys like this is that instead of sitting
>>>> back and learning something (not only from me, but from others with
>>>> experience as well) they miss the resources available to them.
>>>> In this case, he sees the fact that I see myself as a resource for
> him
>>>> as an expression of self importance. Sad!
>>>> Part of it's my fault for sure. I really jumped on his ass about
> that
>>>> pulling the fuel valve bit he did on a student. I should have
>>>> approached him differently. Nobody likes to be told they're flat
>>>> wrong, especially on a public forum.
>>>> I might have helped him instead of ****ing him off like I did.
>>>> Oh well........maybe he's right about one thing. Years ago I
> wouldn't
>>>> have made that mistake :-)
>>>
>>>
>>> Mmm, I kinda doubt you could have helped him. He's shown what he is
>>> clearly at this stage and "learner" doesn;'t seem to be part of his
>>> makeup in any way shape or form.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Bertie
>>>
>> Could be right at that. Certainly a consideration.
>>
>
> Well, as evidence I offer up the fact that he keeps coming back to me
> for more abuse...
>
>
> Bertie

You're not abusing anyone, you moron. It's all in your head.

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
...
> Maxwell wrote:
>> "Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Buttman wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:41:50 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
>>>>> Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation. The
>>>>> quote you have presented here without the accompanying text that
>>>>> completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked by
>>>>> another poster. In other words, the information about the bio was NOT
>>>>> used until it was mentioned negatively by someone else and in response
>>>>> to what was said.
>>>>>
>>>> And that changes things, how? One day someone accuses your article of
>>>> being crap, you defend it. The next day someone else call it crap by
>>>> flagging it, and now you inform the wikipedia admins that you agree it
>>>> should be deleted?
>>> You CAN'T be this stupid! But.........:-) It should be obvious that as
>>> far as Wikipedia is concerned, and a simple Google search confirms this
>>> BTW, the article was listed yesterday by Wiki as a candidate for
>>> deletion by them. This simple fact coupled with the idiotic posts made
>>> here by you and Mxsmanic on this thread simply convinced me that it just
>>> wasn't worth my time to defend the issue any longer.
>>> Since the article isn't really needed any longer anyway, I went to the
>>> site and added my name to what I assume was yours. It doesn't matter
>>> really.
>>> All you have succeeded in doing is to remind me the article is no longer
>>> needed.
>>> If you wish to consider this some sort of victory, please do so.
>>>>> As for my asking that the bio be deleted; that decision was made for
>>>>> the
>>>>> exact reasons given and has nothing whatsoever to do with Wikipedia.
>>>> Oh, I see. Its just a coincidence that you decide to remove your self-
>>>> written vanity article less than 12 hours after somebody with a
>>>> roadrunner connection in El Paso (which may or may not be me) decides
>>>> to flag it as against the wikipedia guidelines.
>>> No, as I said, it was NOT coincidence. The "activity" here on the forum
>>> coupled with realizing that the article was being used as a hammer as
>>> you have done here simply keyed my actions to go to Wiki.
>>> To tell you the truth, until Mxsmanic's post, I had virtually forgotten
>>> the article was there. You can verify that by searching for the last
>>> time I mentioned it on Usenet. In fact, I think I'm fairly safe in
>>> telling you that what you will find are very few if any times I have
>>> mentioned the Wiki article unless someone else mentioned it first; which
>>> of course shoots a rather large hole in your "self importance" theory.
>>>>> For your information, Wikipedia "deletes" thousands of files they feel
>>>>> are unnecessary and take up needed space on their site.
>>>> Yeah, like your crap article.
>>> Unnecessary comment. Shows REAL agenda here. You REALLY need some
>>> lessons in how to nail people. You're way too obvious with statements
>>> like this one. It fairly shouts that you have "other issues" with the
>>> person you're addressing. In my case, you seem to be harboring a bit of
>>> issue over that run in we had a while back when I told you you were the
>>> worst CFI I've ever encountered on Usenet. :-)
>>>>> Our decision to
>>>>> add to the deletion process was simply offered to inform Wiki that we
>>>>> understand the situation completely.
>>>> "Our"? Oh please.
>>> Yes "Our". Explanation not necessary to you.
>>>>> God, what a small world you live in.
>>>> Maybe one of these days you'll realize you're not as important as you
>>>> think you are.
>>> I don't think on these terms. What YOU believe I think of myself isn't
>>> necessarily what I DO think of myself......simply your opinion.
>>>
>>> Sorry you see me this way, but it obviously can't be helped.
>>> DH
>>
>> Bull****. You're finally taking it down because the world is making you
>> deal with how lame it makes you look.
>>
>>
>>
> Right! :-)) Dream on.
>
> --
> Dudley Henriques

Then leave it up another 30 or 45 days. What have you got to loose?

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Maxwell wrote:
> "Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Buttman wrote:
>>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:06:39 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
>>>
>>>> No need. I've already taken steps with Wikipedia that will remove the
>>>> biographical sketch by my own request. The requests I get for this
>>>> information are declining anyway, and our office can handle it here when
>>>> and if needed. When the bio was uploaded to Wiki, I should have realized
>>>> and taken into account Usenet nonsense.
>>>> No biggie at all.
>>> Funny, as just yesterday you were defending the page, saying it was
>>> "frequently" needed:
>>>
>>> "Just to enlighten you, I serve an many real world aviation safety think
>>> tanks where requests for a bio are frequently asked for. The wiki page
>>> simply makes it easier for interested people to access requested
>>> information."
>>>
>>> Now that the wikipedia admins are deleting it, you're now saying the page
>>> is not needed?
>> Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation.
>> The quote you have presented here without the accompanying text that
>> completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked by another
>> poster. In other words, the information about the bio was NOT used until
>> it was mentioned negatively by someone else and in response to what was
>> said.
>>
>> As for my asking that the bio be deleted; that decision was made for the
>> exact reasons given and has nothing whatsoever to do with Wikipedia.
>>
>> For your information, Wikipedia "deletes" thousands of files they feel are
>> unnecessary and take up needed space on their site. Our decision to add to
>> the deletion process was simply offered to inform Wiki that we understand
>> the situation completely.
>>
>> God, what a small world you live in.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dudley Henriques
>
> Ok fine, prove the man wrong. Leave it up for another 30 or 45 days. That'll
> show'em.
>
>
>
>
God, you really ARE stupid aren't you? You actually don't have a clue do
you? I have no control over what stays up or comes down on Wiki. :-))))))


--
Dudley Henriques

[clint]

Its a senoirs home leave us alone!
Dudley Henriques formulated the question :
> 72.191.163.46

[Martin Hotze[_2_]]

Dudley Henriques schrieb:

> Thanks for the feedback. I'm on a Mac and I don't have a DOS prompt.

uhh .. oohh.
then use the shell that came with your OS (terminal).

#m

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

Buttman > wrote in news:furhdb$tjj$1
@registered.motzarella.org:

> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:35:00 -0500, Maxwell sayeth:
>
>> "Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>>> You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>> I think it's anger :-)) He wants to make sure EVERYBODY notices it
>>>>> :-)) D
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> that can be arranged! Bertie
>>>>
>>>>
>>> He IS a real trip isn't he? Oh well...goes with Usenet I guess. :-)
D
>>
>> Damn Dumley, you and Bertie are going to have to stop these circle
>> jerks. They're just way too obvious.
>
> Its pathetic isn't it. Pity my news reader had to burp like that, he
> would have had to answer to the accusations. Now he gets a convenient
> out...
>

Good grief, how crazy are you, exactly?

Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

Buttman > wrote in news:furhge$tjj$2
@registered.motzarella.org:

> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:13:29 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
>
>> Expected. He's been chaffing at the bit since the "fuel starvation on
>> takeoff" thread. When people like him get nailed, they strike back
at
>> the hammer. No big fuss. They attack where they think they see
>> vulnerability, in my case, my having been around since the dinosaurs
>> equates to my "self importance".
>> What's really tragic about guys like this is that instead of sitting
>> back and learning something (not only from me, but from others with
>> experience as well) they miss the resources available to them. In
this
>> case, he sees the fact that I see myself as a resource for him as an
>> expression of self importance. Sad! Part of it's my fault for sure. I
>> really jumped on his ass about that pulling the fuel valve bit he did
on
>> a student. I should have approached him differently. Nobody likes to
be
>> told they're flat wrong, especially on a public forum.
>> I might have helped him instead of ****ing him off like I did. Oh
>> well........maybe he's right about one thing. Years ago I wouldn't
have
>> made that mistake :-)
>
> keep telling yourself that, if it makes you feel more relevant.
>


And what do you tell yourself to make you feel more relevant?

Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:eQbQj.11679$3N1.7600
@newsfe17.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>>>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>>>>> I think it's anger :-)) He wants to make sure EVERYBODY
notices
>> it
>>>>>> :-))
>>>>>>>>> D
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> that can be arranged!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He IS a real trip isn't he? Oh well...goes with Usenet I guess.
>> :-)
>>>>>> It's what i like about it best..He's entertaining, but not
>> especially
>>>>>> so. He's definitely kicking it up a notch with this latest ****,
>>>>>> ghough.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>>
>>>>> Expected. He's been chaffing at the bit since the "fuel starvation
>> on
>>>>> takeoff" thread. When people like him get nailed, they strike
back
>> at
>>>>> the hammer. No big fuss. They attack where they think they see
>>>>> vulnerability, in my case, my having been around since the
dinosaurs
>>>>> equates to my "self importance".
>>>>> What's really tragic about guys like this is that instead of
sitting
>>>>> back and learning something (not only from me, but from others
with
>>>>> experience as well) they miss the resources available to them.
>>>>> In this case, he sees the fact that I see myself as a resource for
>> him
>>>>> as an expression of self importance. Sad!
>>>>> Part of it's my fault for sure. I really jumped on his ass about
>> that
>>>>> pulling the fuel valve bit he did on a student. I should have
>>>>> approached him differently. Nobody likes to be told they're flat
>>>>> wrong, especially on a public forum.
>>>>> I might have helped him instead of ****ing him off like I did.
>>>>> Oh well........maybe he's right about one thing. Years ago I
>> wouldn't
>>>>> have made that mistake :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Mmm, I kinda doubt you could have helped him. He's shown what he is
>>>> clearly at this stage and "learner" doesn;'t seem to be part of his
>>>> makeup in any way shape or form.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>>
>>> Could be right at that. Certainly a consideration.
>>>
>>
>> Well, as evidence I offer up the fact that he keeps coming back to me
>> for more abuse...
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> You're not abusing anyone, you moron. It's all in your head.
>
>
>

Oh obviously. how could I have been so stupid?

Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
:

>
> "Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Maxwell wrote:
>>> "Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Buttman wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:41:50 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
>>>>>> Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation.
>>>>>> The quote you have presented here without the accompanying text
>>>>>> that completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was
>>>>>> attacked by another poster. In other words, the information about
>>>>>> the bio was NOT used until it was mentioned negatively by someone
>>>>>> else and in response to what was said.
>>>>>>
>>>>> And that changes things, how? One day someone accuses your article
>>>>> of being crap, you defend it. The next day someone else call it
>>>>> crap by flagging it, and now you inform the wikipedia admins that
>>>>> you agree it should be deleted?
>>>> You CAN'T be this stupid! But.........:-) It should be obvious that
>>>> as far as Wikipedia is concerned, and a simple Google search
>>>> confirms this BTW, the article was listed yesterday by Wiki as a
>>>> candidate for deletion by them. This simple fact coupled with the
>>>> idiotic posts made here by you and Mxsmanic on this thread simply
>>>> convinced me that it just wasn't worth my time to defend the issue
>>>> any longer. Since the article isn't really needed any longer
>>>> anyway, I went to the site and added my name to what I assume was
>>>> yours. It doesn't matter really.
>>>> All you have succeeded in doing is to remind me the article is no
>>>> longer needed.
>>>> If you wish to consider this some sort of victory, please do so.
>>>>>> As for my asking that the bio be deleted; that decision was made
>>>>>> for the
>>>>>> exact reasons given and has nothing whatsoever to do with
>>>>>> Wikipedia.
>>>>> Oh, I see. Its just a coincidence that you decide to remove your
>>>>> self- written vanity article less than 12 hours after somebody
>>>>> with a roadrunner connection in El Paso (which may or may not be
>>>>> me) decides to flag it as against the wikipedia guidelines.
>>>> No, as I said, it was NOT coincidence. The "activity" here on the
>>>> forum coupled with realizing that the article was being used as a
>>>> hammer as you have done here simply keyed my actions to go to Wiki.
>>>> To tell you the truth, until Mxsmanic's post, I had virtually
>>>> forgotten the article was there. You can verify that by searching
>>>> for the last time I mentioned it on Usenet. In fact, I think I'm
>>>> fairly safe in telling you that what you will find are very few if
>>>> any times I have mentioned the Wiki article unless someone else
>>>> mentioned it first; which of course shoots a rather large hole in
>>>> your "self importance" theory.
>>>>>> For your information, Wikipedia "deletes" thousands of files they
>>>>>> feel are unnecessary and take up needed space on their site.
>>>>> Yeah, like your crap article.
>>>> Unnecessary comment. Shows REAL agenda here. You REALLY need some
>>>> lessons in how to nail people. You're way too obvious with
>>>> statements like this one. It fairly shouts that you have "other
>>>> issues" with the person you're addressing. In my case, you seem to
>>>> be harboring a bit of issue over that run in we had a while back
>>>> when I told you you were the worst CFI I've ever encountered on
>>>> Usenet. :-)
>>>>>> Our decision to
>>>>>> add to the deletion process was simply offered to inform Wiki
>>>>>> that we understand the situation completely.
>>>>> "Our"? Oh please.
>>>> Yes "Our". Explanation not necessary to you.
>>>>>> God, what a small world you live in.
>>>>> Maybe one of these days you'll realize you're not as important as
>>>>> you think you are.
>>>> I don't think on these terms. What YOU believe I think of myself
>>>> isn't necessarily what I DO think of myself......simply your
>>>> opinion.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry you see me this way, but it obviously can't be helped.
>>>> DH
>>>
>>> Bull****. You're finally taking it down because the world is making
>>> you deal with how lame it makes you look.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Right! :-)) Dream on.
>>
>> --
>> Dudley Henriques
>
> Then leave it up another 30 or 45 days. What have you got to loose?
>
>
>
>

The hounds!


Bertie

[[email protected]]

On Apr 24, 8:55 pm, Dudley Henriques > wrote:
> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
> > Buttman > wrote in news:furcr6$cs2$2
> > @registered.motzarella.org:
>
> >> On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 01:31:00 +0000, Buttman sayeth:
>
> >>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
> >>>> I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue
> > with
> >>>> Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?
> >>> I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing
> > an
> >>> IP have to do with piloting?
>
> >>>> He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful
> > toward
> >>>> my IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no
> >>>> doubt that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums
> > because
> >>>> they've said so.
> >>> I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
> >>> liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence
> > structures
> >>> and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really
> > is,
> >>> but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's
> > the
> >>> perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things
> > in
> >>> the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.
>
> >>> I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake.
> > He's
> >>> the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
> >>> build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
> >>> Knievel).
>
> >>> People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them
> > and
> >>> watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as
> > a
> >>> vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that
> > fill
> >>> my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
> >>> story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
> >>> should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
> >>> anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.
>
> >>>> I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?
>
> >>>> -c
> >>>> CP-ASEL-IA
> >>> You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile
> > posts?
> >> I don't know if this is showing up more than once, but I only meant to
> >> send it once
>
> > We understand. it;'s the jerking off thing.
>
> > Bertie
>
> At least he seems to have the situation well in hand :-)
> D

Tweezers don't count.

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:eQbQj.11679$3N1.7600
> @newsfe17.lga:
>
>>
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>> :
>>>
>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>>>> :
>>>>>
>>>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>>>>>> I think it's anger :-)) He wants to make sure EVERYBODY
> notices
>>> it
>>>>>>> :-))
>>>>>>>>>> D
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> that can be arranged!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He IS a real trip isn't he? Oh well...goes with Usenet I guess.
>>> :-)
>>>>>>> It's what i like about it best..He's entertaining, but not
>>> especially
>>>>>>> so. He's definitely kicking it up a notch with this latest ****,
>>>>>>> ghough.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Expected. He's been chaffing at the bit since the "fuel starvation
>>> on
>>>>>> takeoff" thread. When people like him get nailed, they strike
> back
>>> at
>>>>>> the hammer. No big fuss. They attack where they think they see
>>>>>> vulnerability, in my case, my having been around since the
> dinosaurs
>>>>>> equates to my "self importance".
>>>>>> What's really tragic about guys like this is that instead of
> sitting
>>>>>> back and learning something (not only from me, but from others
> with
>>>>>> experience as well) they miss the resources available to them.
>>>>>> In this case, he sees the fact that I see myself as a resource for
>>> him
>>>>>> as an expression of self importance. Sad!
>>>>>> Part of it's my fault for sure. I really jumped on his ass about
>>> that
>>>>>> pulling the fuel valve bit he did on a student. I should have
>>>>>> approached him differently. Nobody likes to be told they're flat
>>>>>> wrong, especially on a public forum.
>>>>>> I might have helped him instead of ****ing him off like I did.
>>>>>> Oh well........maybe he's right about one thing. Years ago I
>>> wouldn't
>>>>>> have made that mistake :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Mmm, I kinda doubt you could have helped him. He's shown what he is
>>>>> clearly at this stage and "learner" doesn;'t seem to be part of his
>>>>> makeup in any way shape or form.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>
>>>> Could be right at that. Certainly a consideration.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well, as evidence I offer up the fact that he keeps coming back to me
>>> for more abuse...
>>>
>>>
>>> Bertie
>>
>> You're not abusing anyone, you moron. It's all in your head.
>>
>>
>>
>
> Oh obviously. how could I have been so stupid?
>
> Bertie

Seems easy enough for you.

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Martin Hotze wrote:
> Dudley Henriques schrieb:
>
>> Thanks for the feedback. I'm on a Mac and I don't have a DOS prompt.
>
> uhh .. oohh.
> then use the shell that came with your OS (terminal).
>
> #m
Found it. Getting used to a new OS after switching from a PC :-)

--
Dudley Henriques

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:P8kQj.67979$y05.11790
@newsfe22.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:eQbQj.11679$3N1.7600
>> @newsfe17.lga:
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>>>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Dudley Henriques > wrote in
>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>>>>>>> I think it's anger :-)) He wants to make sure EVERYBODY
>> notices
>>>> it
>>>>>>>> :-))
>>>>>>>>>>> D
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> that can be arranged!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He IS a real trip isn't he? Oh well...goes with Usenet I
guess.
>>>> :-)
>>>>>>>> It's what i like about it best..He's entertaining, but not
>>>> especially
>>>>>>>> so. He's definitely kicking it up a notch with this latest
****,
>>>>>>>> ghough.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Expected. He's been chaffing at the bit since the "fuel
starvation
>>>> on
>>>>>>> takeoff" thread. When people like him get nailed, they strike
>> back
>>>> at
>>>>>>> the hammer. No big fuss. They attack where they think they see
>>>>>>> vulnerability, in my case, my having been around since the
>> dinosaurs
>>>>>>> equates to my "self importance".
>>>>>>> What's really tragic about guys like this is that instead of
>> sitting
>>>>>>> back and learning something (not only from me, but from others
>> with
>>>>>>> experience as well) they miss the resources available to them.
>>>>>>> In this case, he sees the fact that I see myself as a resource
for
>>>> him
>>>>>>> as an expression of self importance. Sad!
>>>>>>> Part of it's my fault for sure. I really jumped on his ass about
>>>> that
>>>>>>> pulling the fuel valve bit he did on a student. I should have
>>>>>>> approached him differently. Nobody likes to be told they're flat
>>>>>>> wrong, especially on a public forum.
>>>>>>> I might have helped him instead of ****ing him off like I did.
>>>>>>> Oh well........maybe he's right about one thing. Years ago I
>>>> wouldn't
>>>>>>> have made that mistake :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mmm, I kinda doubt you could have helped him. He's shown what he
is
>>>>>> clearly at this stage and "learner" doesn;'t seem to be part of
his
>>>>>> makeup in any way shape or form.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>>
>>>>> Could be right at that. Certainly a consideration.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well, as evidence I offer up the fact that he keeps coming back to
me
>>>> for more abuse...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>
>>> You're not abusing anyone, you moron. It's all in your head.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Oh obviously. how could I have been so stupid?
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Seems easy enough for you.
>
>
>

It does, doesn't it?

Bertie

[Martin Hotze[_2_]]

Dudley Henriques schrieb:

> Could be right at that. Certainly a consideration.

pleeeeeeease! trim the posts you're replying to.

thanks, #m

[gatt[_3_]]

Buttman wrote:

>
>> He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful toward my
>> IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no doubt
>> that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums because they've
>> said so.
>
> I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
> liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence structures
> and odd formal

Maybe you're not looking because you're too busy spewing vile and
looking for angles from which to attack people.

Why did you repost post this, like, 30 times?

-c

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

gatt > wrote in
news:TdydnZUw5JUHvI_VnZ2dnUVZ_r_inZ2d@integraonlin e:

> Buttman wrote:
>
>>
>>> He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful
>>> toward my IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I
>>> have no doubt that he's been a great help to other folks on the
>>> forums because they've said so.
>>
>> I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
>> liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence
>> structures and odd formal
>
> Maybe you're not looking because you're too busy spewing vile and
> looking for angles from which to attack people.

Let him. At least he has shown some talent for being an asshole. It
should be encouraged since he's not much good at anythign else.

Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

Buttman > wrote in
:

> gatt wrote:
>
>> Buttman wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>> He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful
>>>> toward my IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I
>>>> have no doubt that he's been a great help to other folks on the
>>>> forums because they've said so.
>>>
>>> I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
>>> liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence
>>> structures and odd formal
>>
>> Maybe you're not looking because you're too busy spewing vile and
>> looking for angles from which to attack people.
>>
>> Why did you repost post this, like, 30 times?
>>
>> -c
>
> I didn't mean to repost it a bunch of times. I recently switched from
> using google groups, and have yet to find a quality news reader. It
> has nothing to do with me being mad or anything like that. I've
> already moved onto another client.
>
> And the reason I go after people like Dudley is because they are the
> reason this place has gone so far downhill. People see Dudley get away
> with using this group as an ego boost, so they join in as well. Most
> people still here would much rather circle jerk that engage in actual
> aviation discussion. If anyone wishes this group to become anything
> useful again, this trend will have to stop. I believe if you bring
> down Dudley, his sycophants will follow.
>
> And I don't ever attack "people". The only person I've ever attacked
> on this group has been Dudley and his more annoying clone Bertie. I
> don't even go after Mxsmanic because his purpose for being here seems
> to be to chip away at this group in the same way I am.
>

Chip away? Nope. you're entertainment. Period.


Bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
> Buttman > wrote in
> :
>
>> gatt wrote:
>>
>>> Buttman wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful
>>>>> toward my IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I
>>>>> have no doubt that he's been a great help to other folks on the
>>>>> forums because they've said so.
>>>>
>>>> I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
>>>> liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence
>>>> structures and odd formal
>>>
>>> Maybe you're not looking because you're too busy spewing vile and
>>> looking for angles from which to attack people.
>>>
>>> Why did you repost post this, like, 30 times?
>>>
>>> -c
>>
>> I didn't mean to repost it a bunch of times. I recently switched from
>> using google groups, and have yet to find a quality news reader. It
>> has nothing to do with me being mad or anything like that. I've
>> already moved onto another client.
>>
>> And the reason I go after people like Dudley is because they are the
>> reason this place has gone so far downhill. People see Dudley get away
>> with using this group as an ego boost, so they join in as well. Most
>> people still here would much rather circle jerk that engage in actual
>> aviation discussion. If anyone wishes this group to become anything
>> useful again, this trend will have to stop. I believe if you bring
>> down Dudley, his sycophants will follow.
>>
>> And I don't ever attack "people". The only person I've ever attacked
>> on this group has been Dudley and his more annoying clone Bertie. I
>> don't even go after Mxsmanic because his purpose for being here seems
>> to be to chip away at this group in the same way I am.
>>
>
> Chip away? Nope. you're entertainment. Period.
>
>
> Bertie

Don't look now Buttlip, but you just proved his point.

[WingFlaps]

On Apr 26, 9:59*am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:bvsQj.68030$y05.29444
> @newsfe22.lga:
>
>
>
> > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>
> >> Bertie
>
> > Want do you do between squirts, Squirty, chase your tail?
>
> Nope. work on airplanes. been fixing my bike tonight.
>

Talking of planes how did those vortex generators work out?

Cheers

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:l_sQj.58284$QC.32594
@newsfe20.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>>
>>> Yep!!! Squirt, squirt.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I'm curiously unaffected by the squirt squirt thing. Are you sure
you're
>> doing it right?
>>
>> Try again. Maybe all caps will help.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Squirt, squirt.
>
>
>

Nah, see, no zing.


Ah well, you know best.. The numbers thing was marginally livelier,
though.


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:TWsQj.58279$QC.36216
@newsfe20.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:bvsQj.68030$y05.29444
>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Want do you do between squirts, Squirty, chase your tail?
>>>
>>
>> Nope. work on airplanes. been fixing my bike tonight.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Squirt, squirt.
>
>
>

God i love usenet.

Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:OXsQj.58281$QC.530
@newsfe20.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
>> :
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Buttman > wrote in news:furbjr$88t$1
>>>> @registered.motzarella.org:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue
>>>>>> with Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with
rec.aviation.piloting?
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does
>>>>> tracing an IP have to do with piloting?
>>>>
>>>> Abourt as much as you do, anyway.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hey Squirty, I have an idea, tell him about your illness. You know,
>>> the one where you can't STFU.
>>>
>>
>> Why would i want to?
>>
>>> But I guess he already knows too.
>>
>>
>> Ah, i was wondering how long it would take you to take up wiht
Anthony.
>>
>> K00ks always band together in the end.
>>
>>
>> It makes it all worthwhile for me.
>>
>
> Bertie
>
> Squirt, squirt.
>
>
>
>

Yep yep!


Yer really showing me there luser boi.

Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:dYsQj.58282$QC.50714
@newsfe20.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>>
>>> Squirt, squirt.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Well, if you insist.
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Squirt, squirt.
>
>
>

Oh ouch.

Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:xZsQj.58283$QC.35457
@newsfe20.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>
>>
>> So, you're not going to tell me?
>>
>>
>> the squirt thing is an interesting idea, but it's just not bothering
me.
>> Maybe you should try calling me fat or gay or something. That's k00ky
>> and popular, though your squirt thing is at least almost original.
Maybe
>> you should spell it funny or something.
>>
>> like SKWERT!
>>
>>
>> Or skeeeewert!
>>
>> See what i mean?
>>
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Squirt, squirt.
>
>
>

Hmm, see?

just not working.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

WingFlaps > wrote in news:9ffc2cda-3e25-4d21-b4e2-
:

> On Apr 26, 9:59*am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:bvsQj.68030$y05.29444
>> @newsfe22.lga:
>>
>>
>>
>> > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>> >> Bertie
>>
>> > Want do you do between squirts, Squirty, chase your tail?
>>
>> Nope. work on airplanes. been fixing my bike tonight.
>>
>
> Talking of planes how did those vortex generators work out?
>
> Cheers
>

not finished yet. The harsh winter interfered with the rebuild in a big
way so it's only just now being painted. Should be flying in another
month or so, but its been so long since I've flown one I don't know what
I'll have to compare with it.

Bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...

>>
>>
>
> Nah, see, no zing.
>
>
> Ah well, you know best.. The numbers thing was marginally livelier,
> though.
>
>
> Bertie

Then let's see ya stop Squirtie, bet ya can't do it.

Squirt, squirt.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:tntQj.58295$QC.9886
@newsfe20.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Nah, see, no zing.
>>
>>
>> Ah well, you know best.. The numbers thing was marginally livelier,
>> though.
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Then let's see ya stop Squirtie, bet ya can't do it.
>
> Squirt, squirt.
>
>
>

Oh no! he has my number! i can't stop!


I'm doooooomed!

Bwaewhawhahwhahwhahwhhahwhahwhahwhahwha!

Bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
>>
>> Squirt, squirt.
>>
>>
>>
>
> God i love usenet.
>
> Bertie

Sure ya do, otherwise you have no life.

Squirt, squirt.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:qptQj.58298$QC.14209
@newsfe20.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>>>
>>> Squirt, squirt.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Oh ouch.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Squirt, squirt.
>
>
>

Double ouch.

Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:0ptQj.58297$QC.39647
@newsfe20.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:OXsQj.58281$QC.530
>> @newsfe20.lga:
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> Buttman > wrote in news:furbjr$88t$1
>>>>>> @registered.motzarella.org:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal
issue
>>>>>>>> with Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with
>> rec.aviation.piloting?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does
>>>>>>> tracing an IP have to do with piloting?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Abourt as much as you do, anyway.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey Squirty, I have an idea, tell him about your illness. You
know,
>>>>> the one where you can't STFU.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why would i want to?
>>>>
>>>>> But I guess he already knows too.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ah, i was wondering how long it would take you to take up wiht
>> Anthony.
>>>>
>>>> K00ks always band together in the end.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It makes it all worthwhile for me.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Bertie
>>>
>>> Squirt, squirt.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Yep yep!
>>
>>
>> Yer really showing me there luser boi.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> No I'm not, I'm showing everyone else, moron.
>
> Squirt, squirt.
>
>
>

Oh yeah, I'm lusin it.

Snort!


Bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:OXsQj.58281$QC.530
> @newsfe20.lga:
>
>>
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
>>> :
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> Buttman > wrote in news:furbjr$88t$1
>>>>> @registered.motzarella.org:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue
>>>>>>> with Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with
> rec.aviation.piloting?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does
>>>>>> tracing an IP have to do with piloting?
>>>>>
>>>>> Abourt as much as you do, anyway.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hey Squirty, I have an idea, tell him about your illness. You know,
>>>> the one where you can't STFU.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why would i want to?
>>>
>>>> But I guess he already knows too.
>>>
>>>
>>> Ah, i was wondering how long it would take you to take up wiht
> Anthony.
>>>
>>> K00ks always band together in the end.
>>>
>>>
>>> It makes it all worthwhile for me.
>>>
>>
>> Bertie
>>
>> Squirt, squirt.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> Yep yep!
>
>
> Yer really showing me there luser boi.
>
> Bertie

No I'm not, I'm showing everyone else, moron.

Squirt, squirt.

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
>>
>> Squirt, squirt.
>>
>>
>>
>
> Oh ouch.
>
> Bertie

Squirt, squirt.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:dotQj.58296$QC.56219
@newsfe20.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>>>
>>> Squirt, squirt.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> God i love usenet.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Sure ya do, otherwise you have no life.

Yeah, that must be it...


Bertie>
>

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:vqtQj.58300$QC.16340
@newsfe20.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>
>> Hmm, see?
>>
>> just not working.
>>
>>
>
> Squirt, squirt.
>
>
>

Can I use that?

Bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...

>
> Hmm, see?
>
> just not working.
>
>

Squirt, squirt.

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .

>
> not finished yet. The harsh winter interfered with the rebuild in a big
> way so it's only just now being painted. Should be flying in another
> month or so, but its been so long since I've flown one I don't know what
> I'll have to compare with it.
>
> Bertie

Squirt, squirt.

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:vqtQj.58300$QC.16340
> @newsfe20.lga:
>
>>
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>>
>>> Hmm, see?
>>>
>>> just not working.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Squirt, squirt.
>>
>>
>>
>
> Can I use that?
>
> Bertie

Squirt, squirt.

[Buttman]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:4ttQj.58303$QC.6159
@newsfe20.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> .. .
>
>>
>> not finished yet. The harsh winter interfered with the rebuild in a
big
>> way so it's only just now being painted. Should be flying in another
>> month or so, but its been so long since I've flown one I don't know
what
>> I'll have to compare with it.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Squirt, squirt.
>
>
>
Ahhhh nice, golden shower me again


buttman

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
>>
>> Sure ya do, otherwise you have no life.
>
> Yeah, that must be it...
>
>
> Bertie>
>>
>

Must be something like that, or just your illness. You sure waste a lot of
hours of your life, arguing with people on the Usenet. Couldn't be doin' it
for the money. Just the fame uh?

Squirt, squirt.

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .

>>
>> No I'm not, I'm showing everyone else, moron.
>>
>> Squirt, squirt.
>>
>>
>>
>
> Oh yeah, I'm lusin it.
>
> Snort!
>
>
> Bertie

I doubt it, you don't demonstrate enough intelligence to have something to
loose.

Squirt, squirt.

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
>>
>>
>>
>
> Oh no! he has my number! i can't stop!
>
>
> I'm doooooomed!
>
> Bwaewhawhahwhahwhahwhhahwhahwhahwhahwha!
>
> Bertie

Laugh all you what lamer, every post proves it..

Squirt, squirt.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:LytQj.58307$QC.11619
@newsfe20.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> .. .
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Oh no! he has my number! i can't stop!
>>
>>
>> I'm doooooomed!
>>
>> Bwaewhawhahwhahwhahwhhahwhahwhahwhahwha!
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Laugh all you what lamer, every post proves it..
>

Yeh? so what? Think you're the first, fjukkktard?

Not even close.


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> .. .
>>>
>>> Sure ya do, otherwise you have no life.
>>
>> Yeah, that must be it...
>>
>>
>> Bertie>
>>>
>>
>
> Must be something like that, or just your illness. You sure waste a
> lot of hours of your life, arguing with people on the Usenet. Couldn't
> be doin' it for the money. Just the fame uh?

Arguing?
Moi?

You've mistaken me for someoen else.

Nope, what I do is bait k00ks.

And I'm real good at it.


Bertie

[Buttman]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:sutQj.58304$QC.22288
@newsfe20.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> .. .
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:vqtQj.58300$QC.16340
>> @newsfe20.lga:
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hmm, see?
>>>>
>>>> just not working.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Squirt, squirt.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Can I use that?
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Squirt, squirt.
>
>
>

Slurp slurp


Buttman

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> .. .
>
>>>
>>> No I'm not, I'm showing everyone else, moron.
>>>
>>> Squirt, squirt.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Oh yeah, I'm lusin it.
>>
>> Snort!
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> I doubt it, you don't demonstrate enough intelligence to have
> something to loose.
>

I've loosed plenty, fjukktard.





Bertie

[gatt[_3_]]

Maxwell wrote:

>>
>>
>> Yer really showing me there luser boi.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> No I'm not, I'm showing everyone else, moron.
>
> Squirt, squirt.

Not really. Actually, you're acting like a child.


-c

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

gatt > wrote in
news:z5WdnSbHYfU84Y_VnZ2dnUVZ_uLinZ2d@integraonlin e:

> Maxwell wrote:
>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yer really showing me there luser boi.
>>>
>>> Bertie
>>
>> No I'm not, I'm showing everyone else, moron.
>>
>> Squirt, squirt.
>
> Not really. Actually, you're acting like a child.
>

Best thing abotu this scenario is you can tell him what;'s happening and
he'll just keep teling you that you don't understand.

Welcome to my world.


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

gregvk > wrote in
:

> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in news:futurp$b5p$1
> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
>> gatt > wrote in
>> news:z5WdnSbHYfU84Y_VnZ2dnUVZ_uLinZ2d@integraonlin e:
>>
>>> Maxwell wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yer really showing me there luser boi.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bertie
>>>>
>>>> No I'm not, I'm showing everyone else, moron.
>>>>
>>>> Squirt, squirt.
>>>
>>> Not really. Actually, you're acting like a child.
>>>
>>
>> Best thing abotu this scenario is you can tell him what;'s happening
>> and he'll just keep teling you that you don't understand.
>>
>> Welcome to my world.
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Nobody understands Maxwell because his brain functions are more
> evolved than everyone else's. Sort of like comparing a normal human
> brain to that of (say) a garden slug... We're all so primitive and
> stupid compared to him that even his superior mind has a difficult
> time comprehending just how stupid and primitive we are.
>

I only get quality fanbois, me.



Bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
> :
>
>>
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> .. .
>>>>
>>>> Sure ya do, otherwise you have no life.
>>>
>>> Yeah, that must be it...
>>>
>>>
>>> Bertie>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> Must be something like that, or just your illness. You sure waste a
>> lot of hours of your life, arguing with people on the Usenet. Couldn't
>> be doin' it for the money. Just the fame uh?
>
> Arguing?
> Moi?
>
> You've mistaken me for someoen else.
>
> Nope, what I do is bait k00ks.
>
> And I'm real good at it.
>
>
> Bertie
>

WWWHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! God you full of ****.

You're not worth a flying **** at anything. Much less as a troll.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:W9cRj.58587$QC.19021
@newsfe20.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> .. .
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
>> :
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> .. .
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure ya do, otherwise you have no life.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, that must be it...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Must be something like that, or just your illness. You sure waste a
>>> lot of hours of your life, arguing with people on the Usenet.
Couldn't
>>> be doin' it for the money. Just the fame uh?
>>
>> Arguing?
>> Moi?
>>
>> You've mistaken me for someoen else.
>>
>> Nope, what I do is bait k00ks.
>>
>> And I'm real good at it.
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>>
>
> WWWHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! God you full of ****.
>
> You're not worth a flying **** at anything. Much less as a troll.
>
>
>

I beg to differ as do several million whining kiwis,


Bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Buttman" > wrote in message
...
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:4ttQj.58303$QC.6159
> @newsfe20.lga:
>
>>
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> .. .
>>
>>>
>>> not finished yet. The harsh winter interfered with the rebuild in a
> big
>>> way so it's only just now being painted. Should be flying in another
>>> month or so, but its been so long since I've flown one I don't know
> what
>>> I'll have to compare with it.
>>>
>>> Bertie
>>
>> Squirt, squirt.
>>
>>
>>
> Ahhhh nice, golden shower me again
>
>
> buttman

Good job Bertie. Until now, I have only seen Anthony imitate someone else's
identity.

But I guess it's a short trip from being a useless wannabe troll, to lying
impersonator.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
:

>
> "Buttman" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:4ttQj.58303$QC.6159
>> @newsfe20.lga:
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> .. .
>>>
>>>>
>>>> not finished yet. The harsh winter interfered with the rebuild in a
>> big
>>>> way so it's only just now being painted. Should be flying in
>>>> another month or so, but its been so long since I've flown one I
>>>> don't know
>> what
>>>> I'll have to compare with it.
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>
>>> Squirt, squirt.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Ahhhh nice, golden shower me again
>>
>>
>> buttman
>
> Good job Bertie. Until now, I have only seen Anthony imitate someone
> else's identity.
>
> But I guess it's a short trip from being a useless wannabe troll, to
> lying impersonator.
>

Moi? That's agin my server's AUP. you should komplain if you think it
was me fjukktard.



Bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
>
> I've loosed plenty, fjukktard.
>
>
>
>
>
> Bertie

You have indeed.

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
> gregvk > wrote in
> :
>
>
> I only get quality fanbois, me.
>
>
>
> Bertie

You're truly a legend in your own mind.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:ZjcRj.58631$QC.46013
@newsfe20.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> .. .
>>
>> I've loosed plenty, fjukktard.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> You have indeed.
>
>
>

Whoosh.



Do you ewven feel the breeze as it passes through your empty head?





Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:5lcRj.58636$QC.21767
@newsfe20.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>> gregvk > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>
>> I only get quality fanbois, me.
>>
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> You're truly a legend in your own mind.
>


I know.


Bertie
>

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:rxcRj.58685$QC.15734
@newsfe20.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> .. .
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:5lcRj.58636$QC.21767
>> @newsfe20.lga:
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> gregvk > wrote in
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I only get quality fanbois, me.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>
>>> You're truly a legend in your own mind.
>>>
>>
>>
>> I know.
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>>>
>>
>
> Just like Anthony.


Oh no! there you go again saying hurtful things!

Bwawhahwhahwhahwhahwhahwhahwhhawhahwhahwhahwhah!


Bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:5lcRj.58636$QC.21767
> @newsfe20.lga:
>
>>
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> gregvk > wrote in
>>> :
>>>
>>>
>>> I only get quality fanbois, me.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Bertie
>>
>> You're truly a legend in your own mind.
>>
>
>
> I know.
>
>
> Bertie
>>
>

Just like Anthony.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

gregvk > wrote in
:

> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in news:fv3itn$13s$12
> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:W9cRj.58587$QC.19021
>> @newsfe20.lga:
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> .. .
>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>> .. .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sure ya do, otherwise you have no life.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, that must be it...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bertie>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Must be something like that, or just your illness. You sure waste
>>>>> a lot of hours of your life, arguing with people on the Usenet.
>> Couldn't
>>>>> be doin' it for the money. Just the fame uh?
>>>>
>>>> Arguing?
>>>> Moi?
>>>>
>>>> You've mistaken me for someoen else.
>>>>
>>>> Nope, what I do is bait k00ks.
>>>>
>>>> And I'm real good at it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>>
>>>
>>> WWWHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! God you full of ****.
>>>
>>> You're not worth a flying **** at anything. Much less as a troll.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I beg to differ as do several million whining kiwis,
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Maxwell isn't a k00k. He's a ****in genius.
>
> He makes Albert Einstein look stupid. He makes Stephen Hawking look
> like a retard. He makes Kurt Godel look like a braindamaged chimp.


Hmm, maybe he's a bot. A really smart one with extra memory and a self
contained Briggs and Stratton generator attached on the side.


Bertie

[Stealth Pilot[_2_]]

On 28 Apr 2008 04:50:37 GMT, gregvk > wrote:

>Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in news:fv3itn$13s$12
:
>
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:W9cRj.58587$QC.19021
>> @newsfe20.lga:
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> .. .
>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>> .. .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sure ya do, otherwise you have no life.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, that must be it...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bertie>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Must be something like that, or just your illness. You sure waste a
>>>>> lot of hours of your life, arguing with people on the Usenet.
>> Couldn't
>>>>> be doin' it for the money. Just the fame uh?
>>>>
>>>> Arguing?
>>>> Moi?
>>>>
>>>> You've mistaken me for someoen else.
>>>>
>>>> Nope, what I do is bait k00ks.
>>>>
>>>> And I'm real good at it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>>
>>>
>>> WWWHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! God you full of ****.
>>>
>>> You're not worth a flying **** at anything. Much less as a troll.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I beg to differ as do several million whining kiwis,
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
>Maxwell isn't a k00k. He's a ****in genius.
>
>He makes Albert Einstein look stupid. He makes Stephen Hawking look like
>a retard. He makes Kurt Godel look like a braindamaged chimp.

remember that on number lines as you go past zero the sign becomes a
minus.

so you comment should have been he's a ####### -genius.
that I could believe.

Stealth Pilot

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

Stealth Pilot > wrote in
:

> On 28 Apr 2008 04:50:37 GMT, gregvk > wrote:
>
>>Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in news:fv3itn$13s$12
:
>>
>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:W9cRj.58587$QC.19021
>>> @newsfe20.lga:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>> .. .
>>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
>>>>> :
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>>> .. .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sure ya do, otherwise you have no life.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah, that must be it...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bertie>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Must be something like that, or just your illness. You sure waste
>>>>>> a lot of hours of your life, arguing with people on the Usenet.
>>> Couldn't
>>>>>> be doin' it for the money. Just the fame uh?
>>>>>
>>>>> Arguing?
>>>>> Moi?
>>>>>
>>>>> You've mistaken me for someoen else.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope, what I do is bait k00ks.
>>>>>
>>>>> And I'm real good at it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> WWWHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! God you full of ****.
>>>>
>>>> You're not worth a flying **** at anything. Much less as a troll.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I beg to differ as do several million whining kiwis,
>>>
>>>
>>> Bertie
>>
>>Maxwell isn't a k00k. He's a ****in genius.
>>
>>He makes Albert Einstein look stupid. He makes Stephen Hawking look
>>like a retard. He makes Kurt Godel look like a braindamaged chimp.
>
> remember that on number lines as you go past zero the sign becomes a
> minus.
>
> so you comment should have been he's a ####### -genius.
> that I could believe.
>
> Stealth Pilot
>

Strange thing about intellect, it seems it's more of a circle than a
line..



Bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
> :
>
>>
>> "Buttman" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:4ttQj.58303$QC.6159
>>> @newsfe20.lga:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>> .. .
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> not finished yet. The harsh winter interfered with the rebuild in a
>>> big
>>>>> way so it's only just now being painted. Should be flying in
>>>>> another month or so, but its been so long since I've flown one I
>>>>> don't know
>>> what
>>>>> I'll have to compare with it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bertie
>>>>
>>>> Squirt, squirt.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Ahhhh nice, golden shower me again
>>>
>>>
>>> buttman
>>
>> Good job Bertie. Until now, I have only seen Anthony imitate someone
>> else's identity.
>>
>> But I guess it's a short trip from being a useless wannabe troll, to
>> lying impersonator.
>>
>
> Moi? That's agin my server's AUP. you should komplain if you think it
> was me fjukktard.
>
>
>
> Bertie

Keep on lying retard. You left pecker tracks all over that one. I knew you
were pond scum, but I didn't think you were that desperate.

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:rxcRj.58685$QC.15734
> @newsfe20.lga:
>
>>
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> .. .
>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:5lcRj.58636$QC.21767
>>> @newsfe20.lga:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> gregvk > wrote in
>>>>> :
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I only get quality fanbois, me.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bertie
>>>>
>>>> You're truly a legend in your own mind.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I know.
>>>
>>>
>>> Bertie
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> Just like Anthony.
>
>
> Oh no! there you go again saying hurtful things!
>
> Bwawhahwhahwhahwhahwhahwhahwhhawhahwhahwhahwhah!
>
>
> Bertie
>

Squirt, squirt.
Don't forget to rake your feet, Squirty.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:%M8Sj.111618$Ft5.45794
@newsfe15.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> .. .
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:rxcRj.58685$QC.15734
>> @newsfe20.lga:
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>> .. .
>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:5lcRj.58636$QC.21767
>>>> @newsfe20.lga:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> gregvk > wrote in
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I only get quality fanbois, me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>
>>>>> You're truly a legend in your own mind.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I know.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Just like Anthony.
>>
>>
>> Oh no! there you go again saying hurtful things!
>>
>> Bwawhahwhahwhahwhahwhahwhahwhhawhahwhahwhahwhah!
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>>
>
> Squirt, squirt.
> Don't forget to rake your feet, Squirty.
>
>
>

OK..


Bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
> :
>
>>
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> .. .
>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
>>> :
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Buttman" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:4ttQj.58303$QC.6159
>>>>> @newsfe20.lga:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>>>>>> .. .
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> not finished yet. The harsh winter interfered with the rebuild in
>>>>>>> a
>>>>> big
>>>>>>> way so it's only just now being painted. Should be flying in
>>>>>>> another month or so, but its been so long since I've flown one I
>>>>>>> don't know
>>>>> what
>>>>>>> I'll have to compare with it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Squirt, squirt.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Ahhhh nice, golden shower me again
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> buttman
>>>>
>>>> Good job Bertie. Until now, I have only seen Anthony imitate someone
>>>> else's identity.
>>>>
>>>> But I guess it's a short trip from being a useless wannabe troll, to
>>>> lying impersonator.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Moi? That's agin my server's AUP. you should komplain if you think it
>>> was me fjukktard.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Bertie
>>
>> Keep on lying retard. You left pecker tracks all over that one. I knew
>> you were pond scum, but I didn't think you were that desperate.
>>
>>
>
> Prove it, fjukktard. If I'm lying you can get me tossed in an instant.
> Both of my servers have a strict no forgery policy. You can have me
> TOSsed if you're telling the truth...
>
> Well, what are you waiting for?
>
>
>
>
> Bertie

Cuz,,,,, you're Bertrice the Buttlick. You know everyone, youv'e done
everything, you know everything, you know....

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
>>> Bertie
>>
>> Cuz,,,,, you're Bertrice the Buttlick. You know everyone, youv'e done
>> everything, you know everything, you know....
>>
>
> Yes, I do, you're full of **** and are bluffing.
>
>
> Bertie
>

Squirt, squirt.