Linton Yarbrough
May 12th 08, 10:52 PM
On Tue, 6 May 2008 23:11:56 -0400, Peter Dohm wrote:
> "Morgans" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Dave S" > wrote
>>>
>>> I would hope that I know this. I've built a rotary and had it running on
>>> an airframe, alas not without problems (not with the rotary itself, but
>>> part of a builders learning curve)
>>
>> Then you are well aware of the problem of dealing with all of the excess
>> heat the rotary produces.
>>
>> I am not an anti auto engine person; far from it. I like some of the
>> things the rotary brings to the table, in fact.
>>
>> I am not sure that I would want to have to deal with the problems, though
>> some, including you, have been willing to.
>> --
>> Jim in NC
> That does sum it up. The rotaries just take a lot more dedication that I'll
> ever have.
>
> Peter
>
I have a great pair of rotary mechs for /autos/, not sure that
translates well into aircraft.
> "Morgans" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Dave S" > wrote
>>>
>>> I would hope that I know this. I've built a rotary and had it running on
>>> an airframe, alas not without problems (not with the rotary itself, but
>>> part of a builders learning curve)
>>
>> Then you are well aware of the problem of dealing with all of the excess
>> heat the rotary produces.
>>
>> I am not an anti auto engine person; far from it. I like some of the
>> things the rotary brings to the table, in fact.
>>
>> I am not sure that I would want to have to deal with the problems, though
>> some, including you, have been willing to.
>> --
>> Jim in NC
> That does sum it up. The rotaries just take a lot more dedication that I'll
> ever have.
>
> Peter
>
I have a great pair of rotary mechs for /autos/, not sure that
translates well into aircraft.