Re: QF A380 interior pics

[Bavid Anonymous Dromage]

matt weber > writes:

>On Tue, 13 May 2008 09:49:56 +1000, Sylvia Else
> wrote:

>>Bavid Anonymous Dromage wrote:
>>> Peter Fanelli > writes:
>>>
>>>> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/gallery/0,22010,5031631-5006020-5,00.html
>>>
>>>> Wow, nothing exciting there in this fancy A380.
>>>> Just another cattle truck. So what's all the hype about?
>>>
>>> With a much bigger carbon footprint that what's come before, so it's
>>> doing nothing to address the problems of global environmental degradation.
>>>
>>
>>Lower per person.

>Debatable. Fuel burn=sfc x totalweight/(l/d)

>The problem with the A380 in the ultra long haul configuration is the
>weight per passengers is pretty horrifying, even before it was
>overweight.

>Do the math.. 480 or so pax, EW=611000=1273 pounds per passengers

>The reality is the 777-300ER has lower carbon emission per passenger
>than the A380.
>>Sylvia.

I wonder if that will be something the airlines and governments who love to
see them use up fossil fuels will conveniently ignore this fact... Hmmm

--
Good day parishioners! Welcome to the Church of the Great Reverend Bavid RP
Dromage! Defender of the Free World from things which G.O.D Inc. thinks you
shouldn't be allowed to talk about in free society. **** the French Faggots!
http://www.southwestslutbags.com/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=53 **** the Jews!

[Benjamin Dover]

Bavid Anonymous Dromage > wrote in
:

> matt weber > writes:
>
>>On Tue, 13 May 2008 09:49:56 +1000, Sylvia Else
> wrote:
>
>>>Bavid Anonymous Dromage wrote:
>>>> Peter Fanelli > writes:
>>>>
>>>>> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/gallery/0,22010,5031631-5006020-5,
>>>>> 00.html
>>>>
>>>>> Wow, nothing exciting there in this fancy A380.
>>>>> Just another cattle truck. So what's all the hype about?
>>>>
>>>> With a much bigger carbon footprint that what's come before, so
>>>> it's doing nothing to address the problems of global environmental
>>>> degradation.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Lower per person.
>
>>Debatable. Fuel burn=sfc x totalweight/(l/d)
>
>>The problem with the A380 in the ultra long haul configuration is the
>>weight per passengers is pretty horrifying, even before it was
>>overweight.
>
>>Do the math.. 480 or so pax, EW=611000=1273 pounds per passengers
>
>>The reality is the 777-300ER has lower carbon emission per passenger
>>than the A380.
>>>Sylvia.
>
> I wonder if that will be something the airlines and governments who
> love to see them use up fossil fuels will conveniently ignore this
> fact... Hmmm
>

Count on it. When the Concorde started flying, the Frogs exempted it from
their noise regulations.