crosswind correction...hangars

[gatt[_3_]]

Here's a learning opportunity involving the effects of hangars on
crosswind correction, as well as soft-field operations. I used to rent
this aircraft and noticed that it disappeared from the flight line last
summer.


" 14 CFR Part 91: General Aviation...
Aircraft: Cessna 172M, registration: NXXXX
Injuries: 1 Uninjured.

During the takeoff roll in a 30 degree crosswind of about 12 knots, the
aircraft passed on the leeward side of a number of hangars of varying
size. As the aircraft passed through the area where the wind was blocked
by the individual hangars into areas where the wind was not blocked, the
student pilot failed to adequately compensate for the resultant change
in wind velocity and direction. As the student pilot continued the
takeoff, the aircraft departed the side of the runway, impacted a
taxiway exit sign, and entered into an area of wet, soft ground. The
student pilot then pulled the power to idle and applied "full brakes."
The nose gear then dug into the terrain and ultimately collapsed. There
were no anomalies found in the rudder or nose wheel steering systems.

The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable
cause(s) of this accident as follows:
The student pilot's failure to adequately correct for changing wind
conditions, leading to a loss of directional control during the takeoff
ground roll. Factors include wet, soft terrain along the side of the
runway."

Have a safe and spectacular weekend!

-c

[[email protected]]

gatt > wrote:

> Here's a learning opportunity involving the effects of hangars on
> crosswind correction, as well as soft-field operations. I used to rent
> this aircraft and noticed that it disappeared from the flight line last
> summer.


> " 14 CFR Part 91: General Aviation...
> Aircraft: Cessna 172M, registration: NXXXX
> Injuries: 1 Uninjured.

> During the takeoff roll in a 30 degree crosswind of about 12 knots, the
> aircraft passed on the leeward side of a number of hangars of varying
> size. As the aircraft passed through the area where the wind was blocked
> by the individual hangars into areas where the wind was not blocked, the
> student pilot failed to adequately compensate for the resultant change
> in wind velocity and direction. As the student pilot continued the
> takeoff, the aircraft departed the side of the runway, impacted a
> taxiway exit sign, and entered into an area of wet, soft ground. The
> student pilot then pulled the power to idle and applied "full brakes."
> The nose gear then dug into the terrain and ultimately collapsed. There
> were no anomalies found in the rudder or nose wheel steering systems.

> The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable
> cause(s) of this accident as follows:
> The student pilot's failure to adequately correct for changing wind
> conditions, leading to a loss of directional control during the takeoff
> ground roll. Factors include wet, soft terrain along the side of the
> runway."

> Have a safe and spectacular weekend!

I've been to many airports where the wind socks are all pointing in
different directions due to the airflow around buildings.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

[Gig 601Xl Builder]

gatt wrote:
>
> Here's a learning opportunity involving the effects of hangars on
> crosswind correction, as well as soft-field operations. I used to rent
> this aircraft and noticed that it disappeared from the flight line last
> summer.
>
>
> " 14 CFR Part 91: General Aviation...
> Aircraft: Cessna 172M, registration: NXXXX
> Injuries: 1 Uninjured.
>
> During the takeoff roll in a 30 degree crosswind of about 12 knots, the
> aircraft passed on the leeward side of a number of hangars of varying
> size. As the aircraft passed through the area where the wind was blocked
> by the individual hangars into areas where the wind was not blocked, the
> student pilot failed to adequately compensate for the resultant change
> in wind velocity and direction. As the student pilot continued the
> takeoff, the aircraft departed the side of the runway, impacted a
> taxiway exit sign, and entered into an area of wet, soft ground. The
> student pilot then pulled the power to idle and applied "full brakes."
> The nose gear then dug into the terrain and ultimately collapsed. There
> were no anomalies found in the rudder or nose wheel steering systems.
>
> The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable
> cause(s) of this accident as follows:
> The student pilot's failure to adequately correct for changing wind
> conditions, leading to a loss of directional control during the takeoff
> ground roll. Factors include wet, soft terrain along the side of the
> runway."
>
> Have a safe and spectacular weekend!
>
> -c

Where I learned to fly the runway had trees or hangers all around EXCEPT
for one spot near mid field where an old runway used to be. That got
real exciting every once in a while.

[Bob Gardner]

Twenty lashes with a wet noodle for the CFI who turned this person loose
without exploring this not-uncommon problem.

Bob Gardner

"gatt" > wrote in message
. ..
>
> Here's a learning opportunity involving the effects of hangars on
> crosswind correction, as well as soft-field operations. I used to rent
> this aircraft and noticed that it disappeared from the flight line last
> summer.
>
>
> " 14 CFR Part 91: General Aviation...
> Aircraft: Cessna 172M, registration: NXXXX
> Injuries: 1 Uninjured.
>
> During the takeoff roll in a 30 degree crosswind of about 12 knots, the
> aircraft passed on the leeward side of a number of hangars of varying
> size. As the aircraft passed through the area where the wind was blocked
> by the individual hangars into areas where the wind was not blocked, the
> student pilot failed to adequately compensate for the resultant change in
> wind velocity and direction. As the student pilot continued the takeoff,
> the aircraft departed the side of the runway, impacted a taxiway exit
> sign, and entered into an area of wet, soft ground. The student pilot then
> pulled the power to idle and applied "full brakes." The nose gear then dug
> into the terrain and ultimately collapsed. There were no anomalies found
> in the rudder or nose wheel steering systems.
>
> The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s)
> of this accident as follows:
> The student pilot's failure to adequately correct for changing wind
> conditions, leading to a loss of directional control during the takeoff
> ground roll. Factors include wet, soft terrain along the side of the
> runway."
>
> Have a safe and spectacular weekend!
>
> -c