PDA

View Full Version : Giving Credit Where Due


May 25th 08, 09:28 PM
It doth often trouble me to Think
That in this Business we are all to Learne
and none to Teach...
-Robert Cushman, 1619

The Chugger Project is an on-going series of experiments using
inexpensive, commonly available materials to build a simple single-
place airplane. As the work progresses, drawings and photos are
placed in the Files archive of the 'chuggers' Group on Yahoo. Text
and periodic progress reports are posted to my blog.

It's important to note that the primary purpose of these experiments
has to do with materials and methods. For the structure I've simply
scaled up (or down) from proven designs. In doing so, I've tried to
give credit where due, although that isn't as easy as you might
think. Bernard Pietenpol used parallel wing struts on his
Aircamper ...but so did Claude Ryan on the NYP. The scaling is
necessary because the inexpensive, commonly available materials I'm
using do not enjoy the same ratio of strength-to-weight as for
aviation-grade materials.

Pete Bowers' Fly Baby has a beautiful empennage. By adapting Pete's
empennage for the 'chugger' project, I'm paying homage to a past
master but in doing so I'm taking advantage of an invaluable training-
aid. Pete's tail-feathers incorporate no less than nine built-up
spars of box- and C-section designs, as well as curved laminations.
For the novice builder, the empennage is their Trade School.
Fabricating the tail-feathers provides a No-Fault opportunity to
acquire the skills they will need to build the wings and fuselage.

Clearly, the Fly Baby's empennage is more complex than the relatively
simple structures found on a Volksplane or Jo-Del but when scaled for
the Chugger , none of the components are especially large, reducing
these training materials to table-top dimensions. If fabricated from
locally available materials such as door skins and Box Store lumber,
the cost of this training exercise is only a few dollars. In fact, if
the goal of the novice is merely to learn how to build a wooden
airplane, there is no reason to build the entire tail, making the cost
even less.

While the parts-count of the Fly Baby tail makes the structure fairly
complex the required skill-level is delightfully low. Most of the
parts are duplicates, allowing you to take advantage of stack-sawing.
For example, the six shear-webs needed to produce the spars for the
elevators and horizontal stabilizer may be cut-out at one go. The
same holds true with the four shear-webs needed to produce the stern-
post and rudder spar. The diagonals in the horizontal stabilizer are
identical, left to right, so they too may be cut-out as a stack. The
only singleton is the shear-web for the diagonal brace in the
vertical stabilizer. That means all thirteen shear-webs can be
produced from only four patterns.

Once the shear-webs have been stack-sawn, Pete recommended attaching
the spar-caps and filler-blocks to them. In effect, the shear-webs
become your patterns. Since you're dealing with straight edges here
you need only apply a bit of glue (to both surfaces, please), tack a
piece of scrap to your bench-top to act as a back-stop, press the
pieces firmly against the bench (don't forget the waxed paper) and
tack them together with a pneumatic pin-nailer. Thanks to the use of
the pin-nailer the work took only a couple of hours Then comes
fitting the filler blocks, which takes longer – a couple of months
longer in my case, thanks to some health problems that had me lolling
around various doctor's offices instead of working in the shop.

In October 2007 I received a comment from Mr. Corrie Bergeron who is
building a Fly Baby. Corrie pointed out that there were other,
equally accurate methods of fabricating the empennage spars and
diagonals than the one advocated by Mr. Bowers. Rather than make the
shear-webs first – and use them as patterns – Corrie fabricated the
guts of the spars first – and used the guts as the pattern for the
shear-webs. Since I'd already tackled the project using Pete's
method I attached Corrie's comments to the appropriate article in my
blog http://bobhooversblog.blogspot.com/2007/09/av-chuggers-tail.html

Once back on my feet I was anxious to finish the tail surfaces, hoping
to carry the job right through to covering. But before doing so I
recalled the words of Robert Cushman and thought it only fair to give
Corrie's method a try, allowing readers of the blog to draw their own
conclusions. Accordingly, I made up a simple jig for the spars of the
elevators and horizontal stabilizer.

This may verge on heresy but I found Corrie's method offers several
advantages for a novice builder – or for any builder without a shop
full of tools. Pete's method of stack-sawing is dead-simple and
superbly accurate... if you happen to have a band-saw and a big belt
sander. But for the boxed spars, after attaching the spar-caps and
filler blocks in the recommended manner you're faced with the chore of
figuring out where not to varnish on the other shear-web. Corrie's
method offers greater latitude for the novice builder.

I've not posted any photos of the two methods as yet; I'm trying to
learn how to embed video in the blog. When I do, it may appear that
I'm changing horses in mid-stream when in fact I'm merely showing that
even an old dog is capable of learning a new trick – and of giving
credit where due.

-R.S.Hoover

PS – Robert Cushman was one of the Pilgrims

cavelamb himself[_4_]
May 25th 08, 09:39 PM
wrote:
>
> It doth often trouble me to Think
> That in this Business we are all to Learne
> and none to Teach...
> -Robert Cushman, 1619
>
> The Chugger Project is an on-going series of experiments using
> inexpensive, commonly available materials to build a simple single-
> place airplane. As the work progresses, drawings and photos are
> placed in the Files archive of the 'chuggers' Group on Yahoo. Text
> and periodic progress reports are posted to my blog.
>
> It's important to note that the primary purpose of these experiments
> has to do with materials and methods. For the structure I've simply
> scaled up (or down) from proven designs. In doing so, I've tried to
> give credit where due, although that isn't as easy as you might
> think. Bernard Pietenpol used parallel wing struts on his
> Aircamper ...but so did Claude Ryan on the NYP. The scaling is
> necessary because the inexpensive, commonly available materials I'm
> using do not enjoy the same ratio of strength-to-weight as for
> aviation-grade materials.
>
> Pete Bowers' Fly Baby has a beautiful empennage. By adapting Pete's
> empennage for the 'chugger' project, I'm paying homage to a past
> master but in doing so I'm taking advantage of an invaluable training-
> aid. Pete's tail-feathers incorporate no less than nine built-up
> spars of box- and C-section designs, as well as curved laminations.
> For the novice builder, the empennage is their Trade School.
> Fabricating the tail-feathers provides a No-Fault opportunity to
> acquire the skills they will need to build the wings and fuselage.
>
> Clearly, the Fly Baby's empennage is more complex than the relatively
> simple structures found on a Volksplane or Jo-Del but when scaled for
> the Chugger , none of the components are especially large, reducing
> these training materials to table-top dimensions. If fabricated from
> locally available materials such as door skins and Box Store lumber,
> the cost of this training exercise is only a few dollars. In fact, if
> the goal of the novice is merely to learn how to build a wooden
> airplane, there is no reason to build the entire tail, making the cost
> even less.
>
> While the parts-count of the Fly Baby tail makes the structure fairly
> complex the required skill-level is delightfully low. Most of the
> parts are duplicates, allowing you to take advantage of stack-sawing.
> For example, the six shear-webs needed to produce the spars for the
> elevators and horizontal stabilizer may be cut-out at one go. The
> same holds true with the four shear-webs needed to produce the stern-
> post and rudder spar. The diagonals in the horizontal stabilizer are
> identical, left to right, so they too may be cut-out as a stack. The
> only singleton is the shear-web for the diagonal brace in the
> vertical stabilizer. That means all thirteen shear-webs can be
> produced from only four patterns.
>
> Once the shear-webs have been stack-sawn, Pete recommended attaching
> the spar-caps and filler-blocks to them. In effect, the shear-webs
> become your patterns. Since you're dealing with straight edges here
> you need only apply a bit of glue (to both surfaces, please), tack a
> piece of scrap to your bench-top to act as a back-stop, press the
> pieces firmly against the bench (don't forget the waxed paper) and
> tack them together with a pneumatic pin-nailer. Thanks to the use of
> the pin-nailer the work took only a couple of hours Then comes
> fitting the filler blocks, which takes longer – a couple of months
> longer in my case, thanks to some health problems that had me lolling
> around various doctor's offices instead of working in the shop.
>
> In October 2007 I received a comment from Mr. Corrie Bergeron who is
> building a Fly Baby. Corrie pointed out that there were other,
> equally accurate methods of fabricating the empennage spars and
> diagonals than the one advocated by Mr. Bowers. Rather than make the
> shear-webs first – and use them as patterns – Corrie fabricated the
> guts of the spars first – and used the guts as the pattern for the
> shear-webs. Since I'd already tackled the project using Pete's
> method I attached Corrie's comments to the appropriate article in my
> blog http://bobhooversblog.blogspot.com/2007/09/av-chuggers-tail.html
>
> Once back on my feet I was anxious to finish the tail surfaces, hoping
> to carry the job right through to covering. But before doing so I
> recalled the words of Robert Cushman and thought it only fair to give
> Corrie's method a try, allowing readers of the blog to draw their own
> conclusions. Accordingly, I made up a simple jig for the spars of the
> elevators and horizontal stabilizer.
>
> This may verge on heresy but I found Corrie's method offers several
> advantages for a novice builder – or for any builder without a shop
> full of tools. Pete's method of stack-sawing is dead-simple and
> superbly accurate... if you happen to have a band-saw and a big belt
> sander. But for the boxed spars, after attaching the spar-caps and
> filler blocks in the recommended manner you're faced with the chore of
> figuring out where not to varnish on the other shear-web. Corrie's
> method offers greater latitude for the novice builder.
>
> I've not posted any photos of the two methods as yet; I'm trying to
> learn how to embed video in the blog. When I do, it may appear that
> I'm changing horses in mid-stream when in fact I'm merely showing that
> even an old dog is capable of learning a new trick – and of giving
> credit where due.
>
> -R.S.Hoover
>
> PS – Robert Cushman was one of the Pilgrims


Probably the best way to deal with this kind of video is to post it to
YouTube. YouTube then gives you an html link to add to your web page.

Down side is they make pretty small screens.


FWIW,

Richard

--
(remove the X to email)

Now just why the HELL do I have to press 1 for English?
John Wayne

Google