Buster Hymen

[I Hate Buster Hymen]

First, your chosen nickname is dumb.

Second, you are dumb. You are not witty, clever or funny. You are
annoying. Go away.

[Buster Hymen]

I Hate Buster Hymen > wrote in news:1d74f50f-3746-
:

> First, your chosen nickname is dumb.
>
> Second, you are dumb. You are not witty, clever or funny. You are
> annoying. Go away.
>

You're a ****ing moron who enjoys sucking dick in public. Your job at the
glory hole not going well today?

[Birdog]

"Buster Hymen" > wrote in message
8...
>I Hate Buster Hymen > wrote in news:1d74f50f-3746-
> :
>
>> First, your chosen nickname is dumb.
>>
>> Second, you are dumb. You are not witty, clever or funny. You are
>> annoying. Go away.
>>
>
> You're a ****ing moron who enjoys sucking dick in public. Your job at the
> glory hole not going well today?

This is a great addition to the world of aviation!

[Kloudy via AviationKB.com]

Birdog wrote:

>
>This is a great addition to the world of aviation!

I know.
These idiots are embarrassing.

--
Message posted via http://www.aviationkb.com

[hannah]

On Jun 27, 12:14 pm, "Kloudy via AviationKB.com" <u33403@uwe> wrote:
> Birdog wrote:
>
> >This is a great addition to the world of aviation!
>
> I know.
> These idiots are embarrassing.
>
> --
> Message posted viahttp://www.aviationkb.com

They are exactly that, an embarrassment.

Hannah

[Morgans[_2_]]

"hannah" > wrote in message
...
> On Jun 27, 12:14 pm, "Kloudy via AviationKB.com" <u33403@uwe> wrote:
>> Birdog wrote:
>>
>> >This is a great addition to the world of aviation!
>>
>> I know.
>> These idiots are embarrassing.
>>
>> --
>> Message posted viahttp://www.aviationkb.com
>
> They are exactly that, an embarrassment.

There is only one solution, at this point in the evolution of the
rec.aviation groups, especially this one.

All of you that do not consider yourself a jerk, just stop reading and
posting here, for 2 or 3 months.

Let this die, and hope the jerks will get bored and go trouble some other
groups.

Let it die, and come back after there is no activity.

Let it die. It is the only humane thing to do.
--
Jim in NC

[Mxsmanic]

Morgans writes:

> There is only one solution, at this point in the evolution of the
> rec.aviation groups, especially this one.
>
> All of you that do not consider yourself a jerk, just stop reading and
> posting here, for 2 or 3 months.

A killfile accomplishes the same purpose.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Morgans" > wrote in
:

>
> "hannah" > wrote in message
> ..
> .
>> On Jun 27, 12:14 pm, "Kloudy via AviationKB.com" <u33403@uwe> wrote:
>>> Birdog wrote:
>>>
>>> >This is a great addition to the world of aviation!
>>>
>>> I know.
>>> These idiots are embarrassing.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Message posted viahttp://www.aviationkb.com
>>
>> They are exactly that, an embarrassment.
>
> There is only one solution, at this point in the evolution of the
> rec.aviation groups, especially this one.
>
> All of you that do not consider yourself a jerk, just stop reading and
> posting here, for 2 or 3 months.


So you want th egroup all to yourself?


Bertie

[Larry Dighera]

On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:46:46 -0400, "Morgans"
> wrote in >:

>There is only one solution, at this point in the evolution of the
>rec.aviation groups, especially this one.

The BEST solution is for you and the other lurkers in this newsgroup
to begin posting on-topic aviation articles. Here are some topics you
might consider:

1. PIREPS 2. Federal Aviation Politics
3. Aviation Safety 4. State Aviation Politics
5. Aviation Industry News 6. Local Aviation Politics
7. Hangar Flying 8. Aerial Navigation
9. Aviation Metrology 10. Aviation History
11. Military Aviation 12. Flight Training
13. FAA News & Information 14. NTSB News
15. DoT Aviation News 16. DoD Aviation News
17. ... (other topic suggestions solicited)

This forum is ideal for immediate worldwide dissemination of aviation
news, so if you know or read or hear of some aviation related news,
post an article here.

Failing to publish aviation content here and then complaining about
the less than optimal signal-to-noise ratio in this news group only
serves to make you look silly, empower the trolls, and further reduce
the signal-to-noise ratio.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

Larry Dighera > wrote in
:

> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:46:46 -0400, "Morgans"
> > wrote in >:
>
>>There is only one solution, at this point in the evolution of the
>>rec.aviation groups, especially this one.
>
> The BEST solution is for you and the other lurkers in this newsgroup
> to begin posting on-topic aviation articles. Here are some topics you
> might consider:
>
> 1. PIREPS 2. Federal Aviation Politics
> 3. Aviation Safety 4. State Aviation Politics
> 5. Aviation Industry News 6. Local Aviation Politics
> 7. Hangar Flying 8. Aerial Navigation
> 9. Aviation Metrology 10. Aviation History
> 11. Military Aviation 12. Flight Training
> 13. FAA News & Information 14. NTSB News
> 15. DoT Aviation News 16. DoD Aviation News
> 17. ... (other topic suggestions solicited)
>
> This forum is ideal for immediate worldwide dissemination of aviation
> news, so if you know or read or hear of some aviation related news,
> post an article here.
>
> Failing to publish aviation content here and then complaining about
> the less than optimal signal-to-noise ratio in this news group only
> serves to make you look silly, empower the trolls, and further reduce
> the signal-to-noise ratio.

Does that include little notifications of crossposting?



Bertie
>