J3, It is pure perversity to post jpeg in par and rar files!

[Abc]

J3, It is pure perversity to post jpeg in par and rar files!

[J3]

No, with the size of the post it would be impossible to post the 5100
files as jpgs and for you to receive them all intact. RAR files can
correct those which arrived incomplete using the PARs

On 10 Aug 2008 14:44:49 GMT, Abc > wrote:

>J3, It is pure perversity to post jpeg in par and rar files!

[Abc]

J3 > wrote in news:5acu94t3ttb2ts8r338orl6i49isru969r@
4ax.com:

> No, with the size of the post it would be impossible to post the 5100
> files as jpgs and for you to receive them all intact. RAR files can
> correct those which arrived incomplete using the PARs
>
> On 10 Aug 2008 14:44:49 GMT, Abc > wrote:
>
>>J3, It is pure perversity to post jpeg in par and rar files!
>

But his posting in rar is completely messy!

[Guybrush Threepwood[_2_]]

"J3" > schrieb im Newsbeitrag
...
> No, with the size of the post it would be impossible to post the 5100
> files as jpgs and for you to receive them all intact. RAR files can
> correct those which arrived incomplete using the PARs
>
> On 10 Aug 2008 14:44:49 GMT, Abc > wrote:
>
>>J3, It is pure perversity to post jpeg in par and rar files!


Totally wrong!!!! JPEG is an already compressed picture format. The size of
the pictures depend on the quality you choose!!! Thus there is totally no
sense in putting JPEG files in RAR files.

--
Gruß Guybrush

[Peter Hucker[_2_]]

If the odd one is not intact, we can request you repost it. As plain
jpgs, we could look at them one at a time.

On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:21:31 -0400, J3 > wrote:

>No, with the size of the post it would be impossible to post the 5100
>files as jpgs and for you to receive them all intact. RAR files can
>correct those which arrived incomplete using the PARs
>
>On 10 Aug 2008 14:44:49 GMT, Abc > wrote:
>
>>J3, It is pure perversity to post jpeg in par and rar files!
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

The madam opened the brothel door and saw a rather dignified, well-dressed, good-looking man in his late 40s or early 50's.
'May I help you?' she asked.
I want to see Valerie,' the man replied.
'Sir, Valerie is one of our most expensive ladies. Perhaps you would prefer someone else,' said the madam.
'No. I must see Valerie,' he replied.
Just then, Valerie appeared and announced to the man that she charged $5,000 a visit Without hesitation, the man pulled out five thousand dollars and gave it to Valerie, and they went upstairs. After an hour, the man calmly left.
The next night, the same man appeared again, once more demanding to see Valerie. Valerie explained that no one had ever come back two nights in a row -- too expensive -- and there were no discounts. The price was still $5,000.
Again the man pulled out the money, gave it to Valerie, and they went upstairs. After an hour, he left.
The following night the man was there yet again. Everyone was astounded that he had come for a third consecutive night, but he paid Valerie and they went upstairs.
After their session, Valerie questioned the man. 'No one has ever been with me three nights in a row. Where are you from?' she asked.
The man replied, ' Boston .''Really' she said. 'I have family in Boston .''I know,' the man said. 'Your father died, and I am your sister's attorney. She asked me to give you your $15,000 inheritance.'
The moral of the story is that three things in life are certain:
1. Death
2. Taxes ... and
3. Being screwed by a lawyer