Intent to Flood - large IMJ pictures

[OmyGod]

I am going to post a flood of large IMJ pictures

IMJ pictures are bitmaps with a more efficient color palette.
Each picture is 6000 x 5000 pixels large 85 Mb in size.

The scans are not very good quality, but resized they are good enough.

I have 2 Gig, so this will take several days.

Greets & enjoy

O my God

[hielan' laddie]

On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 08:49:45 -0400, OmyGod wrote
(in article >):

> I am going to post a flood of large IMJ pictures
>
> IMJ pictures are bitmaps with a more efficient color palette.
> Each picture is 6000 x 5000 pixels large 85 Mb in size.
>
> The scans are not very good quality, but resized they are good enough.
>
> I have 2 Gig, so this will take several days.
>
> Greets & enjoy
>
> O my God
>
>
>
>
>

And you're gonna do this using MSOE? This I've _got_to see.

Of course, this could just be a joke made by someone from Belgium and whose
ISP has an abuse address of .

Their ISP has a note which reads, in English and (I think) Walloon,
correction requested on that:

To report intrusion attempts, hacking, spamming, or other unaccepted behavior
by a Telenet/Pandora customer, please send a message to

Voor het rapporteren van inbraakpogingen, hacking, spamming, of ander
onaanvaardbaar gedrag van een Telenet/Pandora klant, gelieve een bericht te
zenden naar

Their ISP has a physical address of:

Telenet Operaties N.V.
Liersesteenweg 4
B-2800 Mechelen
Belgium

and they are assigned the IP block 81.164.0.0 - 81.164.255.255. The poster
him/herself was posting from 81.164.121.107, using MSOE 6, probably running
on MS Windows XP SP2. (That's not certain. He/she could be using XP SP3 or,
perhaps, Windows Server 2003.)

It would be a great pity if this were really just a joke as I'd just love to
see those pix in all their high-res glory. As MSOE people can post such high
res pix, it's clear that no-one will complain if I were to post pix at
slightly lower res (say, 1500x1500...) and as he plans to use .imj
(basically, a .jpg with a .bmp header, and a format that some graphix apps
such as my personal fav, Graphic Converter, will handle without a problem but
which basic apps from Mickeysoft may have problems with) if I were to use
something less exotic, such as png, this would also be acceptable.

Stand by for inbound pix at 1500x1500, in .png. Enjoy.

(BTW, Alan-me-lad, this is an example of how to use headers, and why forging
headers is a TOS offence at Newsguy. You _have_ contacted Newsguy re my
'forged' headers, haven't you?)

[Richard[_7_]]

"OmyGod" > schreef in bericht
...
>I am going to post a flood of large IMJ pictures
>
> IMJ pictures are bitmaps with a more efficient color palette.
> Each picture is 6000 x 5000 pixels large 85 Mb in size.
>
> The scans are not very good quality, but resized they are good enough.
>
> I have 2 Gig, so this will take several days.
>
> Greets & enjoy
>
> O my God
>
>

And IMJ stands for...?

[Waldo.Pepper[_2_]]

Funny post.

Waldo.

On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:46:07 +0200, "Richard" >
wrote:

>
>"OmyGod" > schreef in bericht
...
>>I am going to post a flood of large IMJ pictures
>>
>> IMJ pictures are bitmaps with a more efficient color palette.
>> Each picture is 6000 x 5000 pixels large 85 Mb in size.
>>
>> The scans are not very good quality, but resized they are good enough.
>>
>> I have 2 Gig, so this will take several days.
>>
>> Greets & enjoy
>>
>> O my God
>>
>>
>
>And IMJ stands for...?
>

[Ron]

"OmyGod" > wrote in message
...
>I am going to post a flood of large IMJ pictures
>
> IMJ pictures are bitmaps with a more efficient color palette.
> Each picture is 6000 x 5000 pixels large 85 Mb in size.
>
> The scans are not very good quality, but resized they are good enough.
>
> I have 2 Gig, so this will take several days.
>
> Greets & enjoy
>
> O my God
>

You've *got* to be trolling...

Ron
--
Non urinat in ventum

[OmyGod]

"hielan' laddie" > schreef in bericht
...
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 08:49:45 -0400, OmyGod wrote
> (in article >):
>
>> I am going to post a flood of large IMJ pictures
>>
>> IMJ pictures are bitmaps with a more efficient color palette.
>> Each picture is 6000 x 5000 pixels large 85 Mb in size.
>>
>> The scans are not very good quality, but resized they are good enough.
>>
>> I have 2 Gig, so this will take several days.
>>
>> Greets & enjoy
>>
>> O my God

> And you're gonna do this using MSOE? This I've _got_to see.


What's wrong with outlook express,


> Of course, this could just be a joke made by someone from Belgium and
> whose
> ISP has an abuse address of .

Of course it's a joke, in fact it's a parody on the latest events.


> Their ISP has a note which reads, in English and (I think) Walloon,
> correction requested on that:



No not Walloon, it is Dutch, Telenet or Pandora is not available in the
French part of Belgium.


> To report intrusion attempts, hacking, spamming, or other unaccepted
> behavior
> by a Telenet/Pandora customer, please send a message to
>
> Voor het rapporteren van inbraakpogingen, hacking, spamming, of ander
> onaanvaardbaar gedrag van een Telenet/Pandora klant, gelieve een bericht
> te
> zenden naar
>
> Their ISP has a physical address of:
>
> Telenet Operaties N.V.
> Liersesteenweg 4
> B-2800 Mechelen
> Belgium
>
> and they are assigned the IP block 81.164.0.0 - 81.164.255.255. The poster
> him/herself was posting from 81.164.121.107, using MSOE 6, probably
> running
> on MS Windows XP SP2. (That's not certain. He/she could be using XP SP3
> or,
> perhaps, Windows Server 2003.)
>
> It would be a great pity if this were really just a joke as I'd just love
> to
> see those pix in all their high-res glory. As MSOE people can post such
> high
> res pix, it's clear that no-one will complain if I were to post pix at
> slightly lower res (say, 1500x1500...) and as he plans to use .imj
> (basically, a .jpg with a .bmp header, and a format that some graphix apps
> such as my personal fav, Graphic Converter, will handle without a problem
> but
> which basic apps from Mickeysoft may have problems with) if I were to use
> something less exotic, such as png, this would also be acceptable.
>
> Stand by for inbound pix at 1500x1500, in .png. Enjoy.
>
> (BTW, Alan-me-lad, this is an example of how to use headers, and why
> forging
> headers is a TOS offence at Newsguy. You _have_ contacted Newsguy re my
> 'forged' headers, haven't you?)



Have fun



O my God

[OmyGod]

"Richard" > schreef in bericht
bel.net...
>
> "OmyGod" > schreef in bericht
> ...
>>I am going to post a flood of large IMJ pictures
>>
>> IMJ pictures are bitmaps with a more efficient color palette.
>> Each picture is 6000 x 5000 pixels large 85 Mb in size.
>>
>> The scans are not very good quality, but resized they are good enough.
>>
>> I have 2 Gig, so this will take several days.
>>
>> Greets & enjoy
>>
>> O my God
>>
>>
>
> And IMJ stands for...?

http://www.fileinfo.net/extension/imj

Greets,
O my god

[OmyGod]

"Ron" > schreef in bericht
...
>
> "OmyGod" > wrote in message
> ...
>>I am going to post a flood of large IMJ pictures
>>
>> IMJ pictures are bitmaps with a more efficient color palette.
>> Each picture is 6000 x 5000 pixels large 85 Mb in size.
>>
>> The scans are not very good quality, but resized they are good enough.
>>
>> I have 2 Gig, so this will take several days.
>>
>> Greets & enjoy
>>
>> O my God
>>
>
> You've *got* to be trolling...


Of course, it's a satire.



Greets,

O my God

[OmyGod]

"Waldo.Pepper" > schreef in bericht
...
> Funny post.
>
> Waldo.

So you understood the joke.

Greets

O my God

[hielan' laddie]

On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:38:27 -0400, OmyGod wrote
(in article >):

>
> "hielan' laddie" > schreef in bericht
> ...
>> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 08:49:45 -0400, OmyGod wrote
>> (in article >):
>>
>>> I am going to post a flood of large IMJ pictures
>>>
>>> IMJ pictures are bitmaps with a more efficient color palette.
>>> Each picture is 6000 x 5000 pixels large 85 Mb in size.
>>>
>>> The scans are not very good quality, but resized they are good enough.
>>>
>>> I have 2 Gig, so this will take several days.
>>>
>>> Greets & enjoy
>>>
>>> O my God
>
>> And you're gonna do this using MSOE? This I've _got_to see.
>
>
> What's wrong with outlook express,

Far too much to go into in detail. It starts with the Giant Single Monolithic
Database structure and moves on from there. In particular, I don't think that
you can send or receive files that size using MSOE. At least you couldn't
back when I was using it.

>
>
>> Of course, this could just be a joke made by someone from Belgium and
>> whose
>> ISP has an abuse address of .
>
> Of course it's a joke, in fact it's a parody on the latest events.

Not a good one.

>
>
>> Their ISP has a note which reads, in English and (I think) Walloon,
>> correction requested on that:
>
>
>
> No not Walloon, it is Dutch, Telenet or Pandora is not available in the
> French part of Belgium.

Thanks for the correction.

>
>
>> To report intrusion attempts, hacking, spamming, or other unaccepted
>> behavior
>> by a Telenet/Pandora customer, please send a message to
>>
>> Voor het rapporteren van inbraakpogingen, hacking, spamming, of ander
>> onaanvaardbaar gedrag van een Telenet/Pandora klant, gelieve een bericht
>> te
>> zenden naar
>>
>> Their ISP has a physical address of:
>>
>> Telenet Operaties N.V.
>> Liersesteenweg 4
>> B-2800 Mechelen
>> Belgium
>>
>> and they are assigned the IP block 81.164.0.0 - 81.164.255.255. The poster
>> him/herself was posting from 81.164.121.107, using MSOE 6, probably
>> running
>> on MS Windows XP SP2. (That's not certain. He/she could be using XP SP3
>> or,
>> perhaps, Windows Server 2003.)
>>
>> It would be a great pity if this were really just a joke as I'd just love
>> to
>> see those pix in all their high-res glory. As MSOE people can post such
>> high
>> res pix, it's clear that no-one will complain if I were to post pix at
>> slightly lower res (say, 1500x1500...) and as he plans to use .imj
>> (basically, a .jpg with a .bmp header, and a format that some graphix apps
>> such as my personal fav, Graphic Converter, will handle without a problem
>> but
>> which basic apps from Mickeysoft may have problems with) if I were to use
>> something less exotic, such as png, this would also be acceptable.
>>
>> Stand by for inbound pix at 1500x1500, in .png. Enjoy.
>>
>> (BTW, Alan-me-lad, this is an example of how to use headers, and why
>> forging
>> headers is a TOS offence at Newsguy. You _have_ contacted Newsguy re my
>> 'forged' headers, haven't you?)
>
>
>
> Have fun
>
>
>
> O my God
>
>

[Richard[_7_]]

"OmyGod" > schreef in bericht
...
>
> "Richard" > schreef in bericht
> bel.net...
>>
>> "OmyGod" > schreef in bericht
>> ...
>>>I am going to post a flood of large IMJ pictures
>>>
>>> IMJ pictures are bitmaps with a more efficient color palette.
>>> Each picture is 6000 x 5000 pixels large 85 Mb in size.
>>>
>>> The scans are not very good quality, but resized they are good enough.
>>>
>>> I have 2 Gig, so this will take several days.
>>>
>>> Greets & enjoy
>>>
>>> O my God
>>>
>>>
>>
>> And IMJ stands for...?
>
> http://www.fileinfo.net/extension/imj
>
> Greets,
> O my god
>

Thanks for the info about IMJ (tried Google but didn't come up with anything
useful, too many different results). Initially I thought it was an
abbreviatian I didn't recognize, but it's a file extension.
That it was a joke is something I already understood, considering J3's
asocial flood and the way you described in depth what your intentions were
;-).