Re: Shuttle - File 06 of 81 - iss011e11227.jpg (1/5)

[G Paleologopoulos]

Hmmm, let's see, how do we.................
Oh yes,

plonk "Troy"

[[email protected]]

On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:39:18 +0300, "G Paleologopoulos"
> wrote:

>Hmmm, let's see, how do we.................
>Oh yes,
>
>plonk "Troy"
Bite me a__Hole

[Peter Hucker[_2_]]

On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:39:18 +0300, "G Paleologopoulos"
> wrote:

>Hmmm, let's see, how do we.................
>Oh yes,
>
>plonk "Troy"

They're not yenc and they're not rar. WTF is wrong now?!?!?
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

To err is human. To really **** things up requires a computer.

[Morgans[_2_]]

"Peter Hucker" > wrote

> They're not yenc and they're not rar. WTF is wrong now?!?!?

Volume. Too much at one time.

Plus, many of the pictures are virtually the same, taken seconds apart.
Once you saw one, you saw several others.

You know, I like the shuttle. I like detailed pictures. I don't like it
enough to spend a half hour (or more) looking at the same thing, or close to
it, though.
--
Jim in NC

[[email protected]]

Jim in NC

If you don't like the pic's don't look at them. Problem solved.


Troy




On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:21:51 -0400, "Morgans"
> wrote:

>
>"Peter Hucker" > wrote
>
>> They're not yenc and they're not rar. WTF is wrong now?!?!?
>
> Volume. Too much at one time.
>
>Plus, many of the pictures are virtually the same, taken seconds apart.
>Once you saw one, you saw several others.
>
>You know, I like the shuttle. I like detailed pictures. I don't like it
>enough to spend a half hour (or more) looking at the same thing, or close to
>it, though.

[Morgans[_2_]]

> wrote in message
...
>
>
>
> Jim in NC
>
> If you don't like the pic's don't look at them. Problem solved.

You are right, and mostly, I didn't, and I didn't even block you.

I looked at a few, and skipped the rest.

I was merely stating the reason that some people found that flood
objectionable.
--
Jim in NC

[Peter Hucker[_2_]]

On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:21:51 -0400, "Morgans"
> wrote:

>
>"Peter Hucker" > wrote
>
>> They're not yenc and they're not rar. WTF is wrong now?!?!?
>
> Volume. Too much at one time.
>
>Plus, many of the pictures are virtually the same, taken seconds apart.
>Once you saw one, you saw several others.

Then look at every tenth one.

>You know, I like the shuttle. I like detailed pictures. I don't like it
>enough to spend a half hour (or more) looking at the same thing, or close to
>it, though.

But some people do.
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

A baby was born that was so advanced that he could talk. He looked around the delivery room and saw the doctor.
"Are you my doctor?" he asked.
"Yes, I am."
The baby said "Thank you for taking such good care of me during birth."
He looked at his mother and asked, "Are you my mother?"
"Yes, I am," she said.
"Thank you for taking such good care of me before I was born" he said.
He then looked at his father and asked "Are you my father?"
"Yes, I am," his father answered.
The baby motioned him close, then poked him on the forehead with his index finger 5 times, saying "I want you to know that THAT HURTS!"

[Peter Hucker[_2_]]

On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 18:32:18 -0400, "Morgans"
> wrote:

>
> wrote in message
...
>>
>>
>>
>> Jim in NC
>>
>> If you don't like the pic's don't look at them. Problem solved.
>
>You are right, and mostly, I didn't, and I didn't even block you.
>
> I looked at a few, and skipped the rest.
>
>I was merely stating the reason that some people found that flood
>objectionable.

Some people find everything objectionable.
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

What's the best thing to get for a woman who has everything?
A man to show her how to work it.

[Morgans[_2_]]

"Peter Hucker" > wrote

> Some people find everything objectionable.

Well, I don't agree with you saying such a thing.
As a matter of fact, I find it quite objectionable.
<ggggg>
--
Jim in NC

[JRW]

Peter Hucker wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:21:51 -0400, "Morgans"
> > wrote:
>
>
>> "Peter Hucker" > wrote
>>
>>
>>> They're not yenc and they're not rar. WTF is wrong now?!?!?
>>>
>> Volume. Too much at one time.
>>
>> Plus, many of the pictures are virtually the same, taken seconds apart.
>> Once you saw one, you saw several others.
>>
>
> Then look at every tenth one.
>
>
>> You know, I like the shuttle. I like detailed pictures. I don't like it
>> enough to spend a half hour (or more) looking at the same thing, or close to
>> it, though.
>>
>
> But some people do.
>
I doubt you even downloaded them Peter.

You just continue to troll and insult people. That's your bag.

Thank God that most folks in the UK, are not as ignorant as you.

[Peter Hucker[_2_]]

On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 21:45:30 -0400, "Morgans"
> wrote:

>
>"Peter Hucker" > wrote
>
>> Some people find everything objectionable.
>
> Well, I don't agree with you saying such a thing.
>As a matter of fact, I find it quite objectionable.
><ggggg>

You're going to cause a quantum loop. You'll not be warned again.
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

If a cow laughs, does milk come out of its nose?

[Peter Hucker[_2_]]

On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:08:28 +0200, JRW > wrote:

>Peter Hucker wrote:
>> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:21:51 -0400, "Morgans"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>>> "Peter Hucker" > wrote
>>>
>>>
>>>> They're not yenc and they're not rar. WTF is wrong now?!?!?
>>>>
>>> Volume. Too much at one time.
>>>
>>> Plus, many of the pictures are virtually the same, taken seconds apart.
>>> Once you saw one, you saw several others.
>>>
>>
>> Then look at every tenth one.
>>
>>
>>> You know, I like the shuttle. I like detailed pictures. I don't like it
>>> enough to spend a half hour (or more) looking at the same thing, or close to
>>> it, though.
>>>
>>
>> But some people do.
>>
>I doubt you even downloaded them Peter.

I downloaded all of them actually.

>You just continue to troll and insult people. That's your bag.

Only when they are wrong.

>Thank God that most folks in the UK, are not as ignorant as you.

Oh it's a religious thing. I tend to find it's always believers that
get upset with me on usenet.
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

A brunette, a blonde, and a redhead are all in third grade. Who has the biggest breasts?
The blonde, because she's 18.

[Morgans[_2_]]

"Peter Hucker" > wrote

> You're going to cause a quantum loop. You'll not be warned again.

Is that where you pull back on the stick too hard, and you go all the way
around, but stall your di-lithium crystals?

Damn, I hate it when I do that! <g>
--
Jim in NC