Barack Obama victory dance

[EMTAE[_3_]]

Barack Obama victory dance

You will see a lot of this if Obama wins

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JY-iwQ6Gi_I&feature=related

[Mike[_22_]]

"EMTAE" > wrote in message
...
<snipBS>

http://www.natca.org/mediacenter/BarackObama.msp

[Mike[_22_]]

"EMTAE" > wrote in message
...
<snipBS>

I bet this one hurts even more, right JJ? Kinda hits a bit more close to
home, eh?

http://www.newsmgr.com/publish/article_1048.shtml

Speaking of "kissing the black ass", I wonder what would happen if your
minority neighbors knew about all the racist filth you post on a daily
basis? You think they would confront you with it? You think you wouldn't
be kissing their ass?

See ya around, JJ. Or maybe not, right?

[EMTAE[_3_]]

Mike wrote:
> "EMTAE" > wrote in message
> ...
> <snipBS>
>
> I bet this one hurts even more, right JJ? Kinda hits a bit more close
> to home, eh?
>
> http://www.newsmgr.com/publish/article_1048.shtml
>
> Speaking of "kissing the black ass", I wonder what would happen if your
> minority neighbors knew about all the racist filth you post on a daily
> basis? You think they would confront you with it? You think you
> wouldn't be kissing their ass?
>
> See ya around, JJ. Or maybe not, right?


The truth when spoken is always racist when
the truth exposes the REVERSE racism or agenda
of the other culture or agenda who is racist.

I will be around
I am your worst nightmare

BTW, Who the **** is JJ??

Define Racism

Go ahead

I dare you

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

EMTAE > wrote in :

> Mike wrote:
>> "EMTAE" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> <snipBS>
>>
>> I bet this one hurts even more, right JJ? Kinda hits a bit more
close
>> to home, eh?
>>
>> http://www.newsmgr.com/publish/article_1048.shtml
>>
>> Speaking of "kissing the black ass", I wonder what would happen if
your
>> minority neighbors knew about all the racist filth you post on a
daily
>> basis? You think they would confront you with it? You think you
>> wouldn't be kissing their ass?
>>
>> See ya around, JJ. Or maybe not, right?
>
>
> The truth when spoken is always racist when
> the truth exposes the REVERSE racism or agenda
> of the other culture or agenda who is racist.
>
> I will be around
> I am your worst nightmare
>
> BTW, Who the **** is JJ??
>
> Define Racism
>
> Go ahead
>
> I dare you
>

Lesssee.


a. You
B. idiotic.



Bertie

[Mike[_22_]]

"EMTAE" > wrote in message ...
> Mike wrote:
>> "EMTAE" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> <snipBS>
>>
>> I bet this one hurts even more, right JJ? Kinda hits a bit more close to
>> home, eh?
>>
>> http://www.newsmgr.com/publish/article_1048.shtml
>>
>> Speaking of "kissing the black ass", I wonder what would happen if your
>> minority neighbors knew about all the racist filth you post on a daily
>> basis? You think they would confront you with it? You think you
>> wouldn't be kissing their ass?
>>
>> See ya around, JJ. Or maybe not, right?
>
>
> The truth when spoken is always racist when
> the truth exposes the REVERSE racism or agenda
> of the other culture or agenda who is racist.
>
> I will be around
> I am your worst nightmare

Not quite, JJ, but I am yours. and if you do stick around you're going to
learn that one the hard way.

> BTW, Who the **** is JJ??

Why you're JJ of course, JJ. Don't you even know yourself, or have you
become completely delusional with your idiotic sock puppets these days?
Don't play stupid with me fat boi. You're going to lose that game even
though you're very well equipped. I've included enough details you know I'm
right.

I know who you are. What do you think about that, JJ? Do you want me to
prove it? I can very easily and in a way you CAN'T possibly deny. Well, I
underestimate you JJ. I'm sure you can since you really are stupid enough
to try it, but nobody is going to believe you because the evidence is
overwhelming. I also know where you are and your history. Do you want me
to talk about that too? Since you don't know who JJ is, I'm sure you won't
mind, right?

I'll make a deal with you, JJ. Leave and never come back to spam the
aviation groups, and I'll agree to keep completely mum about your sordid
past and you know what I'm talking about. Otherwise you're going to find
out what "free speech" really means when you're not so anonymous here or
anywhere else, JJ. Leave. Don't come back. Ever. This is not negotiable.
Feel free to spread your filth in the appropriate NGs, but not here or I'm
going to exercise my "free speech" in ways you can't possibly imagine. Stew
on that one, JJ. The choice is yours. For once in your life choose wisely.

[Kloudy via AviationKB.com]

Mike wrote:
>>> <snipBS>
>>>
>[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>> I will be around
>> I am your worst nightmare
>

>
>I'll make a deal with you, JJ. Leave and never come back to spam the
>aviation groups, and I'll agree to keep completely mum about your sordid
>past and you know what I'm talking about. Otherwise you're going to find
>out what "free speech" really means when you're not so anonymous here or
>anywhere else, JJ. Leave. Don't come back. Ever. This is not negotiable.
>Feel free to spread your filth in the appropriate NGs, but not here or I'm
>going to exercise my "free speech" in ways you can't possibly imagine. Stew
>on that one, JJ. The choice is yours. For once in your life choose wisely.


He's not worth the respect you afford.

--
Message posted via http://www.aviationkb.com

[Mike[_22_]]

"Kloudy via AviationKB.com" <u33403@uwe> wrote in message
news:89f4ae05309ac@uwe...
> Mike wrote:
>>>> <snipBS>
>>>>
>>[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>>> I will be around
>>> I am your worst nightmare
>>
>
>>
>>I'll make a deal with you, JJ. Leave and never come back to spam the
>>aviation groups, and I'll agree to keep completely mum about your sordid
>>past and you know what I'm talking about. Otherwise you're going to find
>>out what "free speech" really means when you're not so anonymous here or
>>anywhere else, JJ. Leave. Don't come back. Ever. This is not
>>negotiable.
>>Feel free to spread your filth in the appropriate NGs, but not here or I'm
>>going to exercise my "free speech" in ways you can't possibly imagine.
>>Stew
>>on that one, JJ. The choice is yours. For once in your life choose
>>wisely.
>
>
> He's not worth the respect you afford.

He's a piece of human filth, a waste of skin (and a lot of it), and not
worth anyone's respect, but that doesn't mean I can't have a bit of fun with
him. He'll either run away with his tail between his legs (if he can get
his one brain cell spun up) or he will call me. Either way I will enjoy the
outcome. Sometimes getting there is at least half the fun.

If you really want to know more about him, just look up fat redneck scumbag
in the dictionary. His picture is there. Then assume the worst behavior
such a person is capable, and you've got a pretty close facsimile of JJ.

[EMTAE[_3_]]

I am not fat
I will never go away

EVER

So go ahead and do your thing
I don't give a flying ****
It's a free country(Unless you support Obama Marxism)

Go ahead and call me names and make false claims and parrot
the sycophant line. When you back a sycophant into the
corner that is all they can do. Lie and belittle and obfuscate.

The truth about the reverse racism in the FAA will be heard
The TRUTH about the incompetent managers in the FAA will be
heard
The truth about the LIES in the FAA will be heard
The TRUTH about controller and technician abuse in the FAA
by UNQUALIFIED management WILL BE HEARD

BTW, you never never never answered the question?

Why did the FAA score 204 out of 222 in employee morale and
their opinion of management in 2007??? Almost DEAD LAST

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm?

Rather than calling me a "Piece of ****" redneck why not
address the FACTS??

Why did the FAA score SO ****ING LOW???

http://bestplacestowork.org/BPTW/rankings/agency.php?code=TD00&q=scores_large

THE FAA GOT AN F-MINUS Oh Boy!!!!!

WHY??

Stick to the question if your pea sycophant brain will allow it

BTW again. That "Sordid" past you LIE about?

My Government records from the National Archives show
nothing but EXCELLENT and HONORABLE service to my country
I got a wall full of awards and certificates from my proud
Government and military service

Give us facts NOT FAA Management or your LIES

If I was so bad and such a SORDID person would that not show
up in official records??

Sordid and a bad past is always fabricated by weasel mangers
when you expose the SCAM they are desperately trying to
hide. (And so far the FAA and their SCAM is being exposed
everyday by people way above our pay positions)

http://removesturgell.blogspot.com/

You are a piece of **** LIAR. So there BOI

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=faa+civil+rights&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=

The FAA is RACIST against WHITE MALE HETEROSEXUAL EMPLOYEES.
PERIOD. Been that way for over 10 years. PERIOD

[Gig 601Xl Builder]

EMTAE wrote:

>
> Rather than calling me a "Piece of ****" redneck why not address the
> FACTS??
>
> Why did the FAA score SO ****ING LOW???
>

OK, well since you gave the link I looked at how they scored.

One of the reasons they were so low in the ranking was the perceived lack of


Support for Diversity
The support for diversity category measures the extent to which
employees believe that actions and policies of leadership and management
promote and respect diversity.

Ranked 215 out of 222 agencies.

That sort of undermines your theory doesn't it?

[Mike[_22_]]

Since JJ dared me to, I feel obligated to post the TRUTH about him so
everyone can know the history behind this raving kook who has been spamming
this NG for many years. As JJ claims to value the TRUTH so much, I'm sure
he can appreciate all of it. Since much of the personal information has
been posted by JJ himself, I really don't feel bad about posting it even
though shining a light on this cockroach wouldn't bother me anyway. How I
got all this information is pretty simple. While researching a subject in
the archives the aviation NGs, I ran across an old post that was clearly
JJs. A few more clicks provided his personal information such as name,
employment, and location which he posted himself. I have a very old and
good friend of mine who works near where he worked. This person is an
inspector in the Atlanta area. It just so happens that inspectors fall
under the same union as JJ's old union. He told me he had heard of JJ and
he would make some inquiries about him and get back to me. Much of what I
relate comes from him, who I consider a very reliable source.

His real name is John A Johnson, and he lives in Dallas, GA. JJ is the
epitome of a redneck. He drove a big honkin' redneck truck and carried
himself as if he were the cock of the walk, but everyone else regarded him
as a fat boorish individual. He refers to himself as JJ, so when he asks,
"Who the *** is JJ", he very well knew HE was JJ. So obviously he was not
only acting stupid (possibly not an act), but at least somewhat afraid of
being revealed, but I'm sure that would be apparent to the most casual
observer anyway. JJ claims "EXCELLENT and HONORABLE service to my country",
but the real truth really can't be found in the National Archives. He was
at one time a FAA employee. He does not appear to be a present FAA
employee. As far as why he is not longer an FAA employee, details on that
are a bit cloudy. JJ is 50 years old, which would not make him eligible for
regular retirement. Rumors as to why he left include termination, medical
retirement, or he quit rather than face termination. As the FAA doesn't
disclose such information, rumors are all I have here and I'm not going to
try and characterize them as anything but, however there does seem to be
some basis for them. JJ is an admitted drug user (during the time of his
FAA employment) and the FAA does administer random drug and alcohol tests to
safety related employees. Medical retirement is also a popular option with
employees like JJ. As such employees are largely worthless and
counterproductive, the FAA doesn't scrutinize their medical retirement
applications as well as they should. It's better for all concerned for them
to leave anyway and as such this is a very popular option for union
parasites. JJ is 50 and regular retirement is 55. That much I know for
sure. So for whatever reason, JJ left the FAA early and there's not really
too many "EXCELLENT and HONORABLE" explanations which could possibly account
for this. His own explanation should be pretty amusing to be sure and I
look forward to it assuming he will even try.

JJ worked as a technician on navigational aid facilities in the Atlanta area
(ILS, VOR, etc). I use the term "worked" very loosely here because that's
not really how his peers described it. The way they described it was in
actuality JJ spent most of his time sitting on his fat arse (and yes it is
fat regardless of what he claims) and what little he did was in the union
arena. JJ spent a lot of time ranting about "management", "minorities", and
"gays" (he rarely used those terms on the last two, but you get the idea),
filling out grievances and whatever other complaint paperwork he could get
his hands on, attending union boondoggles, and anything else he could
possibly do to get out of his assigned FAA duties while his coworkers
constantly picked up his slack. JJ had aspirations of getting a real full
time union position (there are a few genuine full time union positions), but
he never rose above the rank of "useful idiot" in the union hierarchy. For
those that have never ran across such a parasitic individual, you should
know that there are a few people in the FAA who make a career out of simply
being in the union, even though they are supposed to be a productive
employee. The union fully protects them, and most managers look the other
way. In that sense, JJ is right. FAA management is very inept when it
comes to removing poor performing employees, but the vast majority of those
employees are retained because of the wear their union membership on their
sleeve and the union protects them. The fact that JJ remained an employee
for so long is testament to it. What's certainly clear to me is that JJ
actually epitomizes the behavior he attributes to "non-white males". I
really can't say I was surprised. Bigots project their faults on others.
That's why they are bigots to begin with.

He will spend the rest of his fat useless life living a sedentary lifestyle
as a government pensioner (even if he got fired he can still collect an
annuity when he gets to 55). Coming from someone who constantly rants about
the government, you may find that quite ironic. I'm sure he'll spend the
majority of that time ranting his kookie thoughts on usenet to those who
laugh at him. With any luck he will provide quite a number of years of
entertainment before he dies of congestive heart failure, but the statistics
aren't working in his favor. Fat, lazy, 50, and no real reason to leave the
house doesn't work in his favor. Now that you know who he REALLY is, you
can chuckle just a bit deeper and longer.


"EMTAE" > wrote in message
...
>I am not fat
> I will never go away
>
> EVER
>
> So go ahead and do your thing
> I don't give a flying ****
> It's a free country(Unless you support Obama Marxism)
>
> Go ahead and call me names and make false claims and parrot
> the sycophant line. When you back a sycophant into the corner that is all
> they can do. Lie and belittle and obfuscate.
>
> The truth about the reverse racism in the FAA will be heard
> The TRUTH about the incompetent managers in the FAA will be heard
> The truth about the LIES in the FAA will be heard
> The TRUTH about controller and technician abuse in the FAA by UNQUALIFIED
> management WILL BE HEARD
>
> BTW, you never never never answered the question?
>
> Why did the FAA score 204 out of 222 in employee morale and their opinion
> of management in 2007??? Almost DEAD LAST
>
> Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm?
>
> Rather than calling me a "Piece of ****" redneck why not address the
> FACTS??
>
> Why did the FAA score SO ****ING LOW???
>
> http://bestplacestowork.org/BPTW/rankings/agency.php?code=TD00&q=scores_large
>
> THE FAA GOT AN F-MINUS Oh Boy!!!!!
>
> WHY??
>
> Stick to the question if your pea sycophant brain will allow it
>
> BTW again. That "Sordid" past you LIE about?
>
> My Government records from the National Archives show nothing but
> EXCELLENT and HONORABLE service to my country
> I got a wall full of awards and certificates from my proud Government and
> military service
>
> Give us facts NOT FAA Management or your LIES
>
> If I was so bad and such a SORDID person would that not show up in
> official records??
>
> Sordid and a bad past is always fabricated by weasel mangers when you
> expose the SCAM they are desperately trying to hide. (And so far the FAA
> and their SCAM is being exposed everyday by people way above our pay
> positions)
>
> http://removesturgell.blogspot.com/
>
> You are a piece of **** LIAR. So there BOI
>
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=faa+civil+rights&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=
>
> The FAA is RACIST against WHITE MALE HETEROSEXUAL EMPLOYEES. PERIOD. Been
> that way for over 10 years. PERIOD
>
>
>
>
>

[EMTAE[_3_]]

Gig 601Xl Builder wrote:
> EMTAE wrote:
>
>>
>> Rather than calling me a "Piece of ****" redneck why not address the
>> FACTS??
>>
>> Why did the FAA score SO ****ING LOW???
>>
>
> OK, well since you gave the link I looked at how they scored.
>
> One of the reasons they were so low in the ranking was the perceived
> lack of
>
>
> Support for Diversity
> The support for diversity category measures the extent to which
> employees believe that actions and policies of leadership and management
> promote and respect diversity.
>
> Ranked 215 out of 222 agencies.
>
> That sort of undermines your theory doesn't it?

No it does not.

The out of control blind support for "Diversity" and
political correctness IS the reason the FAA is so bad off

You misinterpreted the results. It is the FORCE FEEDING of
Diversity(Reverse Racism) the disgruntled work force of the
FAA is tired of.

In the FAA, you must ACCEPT minority managers who are
incompetent and unqualified. I believe you interpreted the
results wrong.

Look at the scores for the respect for management. It is in
the toilet. It must be all those NATCA and PASS members
slewing the score huh??

The FAA is totally ****ed up. Their own internal data shows
it. But nothing will be done. It is a culture of corruption
and lies out of control. Sorta like a high technology banana
republic in action

Until hundreds die in a pink mist somewhere over America soon

And then it will all change

Maybe after hundreds die qualifications not skin color will
determine who runs the FAA???

Maybe? Or is "Kissing the Black Ass" completely out of
control???

Only time will tell

[EMTAE[_3_]]

You never answered the question about why the FAA scored so
low in the 2007 Government employee survey? You continue to
post lies and untruths and false data.

I don't care what you say AT ALL because I know it's all a
lie. You are talking out your ass and making false and
disparaging comments about people with no basis of fact

Now, answer the question.

Why did the FAA score so low in 2007 regarding employee morale??

Or is it easier to shoot the messenger and spread lies about
whoever you can to deviate yourself from facing the facts??

You MUST be an ex FAA Manager. You must be. Lying piece of
**** human cockroach **** bag **** face

Go ahead. Tell us you are not either current or former FAA
Management.

Go ahead

As far as drug use, I guess every FAA Manager who goes to
some boondoggle and stays drunk and chases whores are not
druggies huh? ALCOHOL is a DRUG dumb ass

Whoever you are you are so full of **** your eyes are brown

Another question you did not address. Why does the FAA
promote unqualified minorities and women into senior FAA
management?

Why??

Oh one more thing. If you check my newsgroup header it is
not in Georgia. Wrong again numb nuts.

What an idiot

[Mike[_22_]]

"Gig 601Xl Builder" > wrote in message
m...
> EMTAE wrote:
>
>>
>> Rather than calling me a "Piece of ****" redneck why not address the
>> FACTS??
>>
>> Why did the FAA score SO ****ING LOW???
>>
>
> OK, well since you gave the link I looked at how they scored.
>
> One of the reasons they were so low in the ranking was the perceived lack
> of
>
>
> Support for Diversity
> The support for diversity category measures the extent to which employees
> believe that actions and policies of leadership and management promote and
> respect diversity.
>
> Ranked 215 out of 222 agencies.
>
> That sort of undermines your theory doesn't it?

The reason they scored low in the first place was because right before the
survey controllers got a forced contract and other unions were facing
similar problems. If you look at the survey, the FAA received a low score
for pay and benefits, however the fact is the FAA is THE highest paying
agency in the entire federal workforce. Furthermore the FAA has a
relatively low percentage of college graduates. Where else in the
government can thousands of employees get paid six figures with no formal
education? I'll leave it for you to decide how truly objective the survey
is.

[EMTAE[_3_]]

Mike wrote:
> "Gig 601Xl Builder" > wrote in message
> m...
>> EMTAE wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Rather than calling me a "Piece of ****" redneck why not address the
>>> FACTS??
>>>
>>> Why did the FAA score SO ****ING LOW???
>>>
>>
>> OK, well since you gave the link I looked at how they scored.
>>
>> One of the reasons they were so low in the ranking was the perceived
>> lack of
>>
>>
>> Support for Diversity
>> The support for diversity category measures the extent to which
>> employees believe that actions and policies of leadership and
>> management promote and respect diversity.
>>
>> Ranked 215 out of 222 agencies.
>>
>> That sort of undermines your theory doesn't it?
>
> The reason they scored low in the first place was because right before
> the survey controllers got a forced contract and other unions were
> facing similar problems. If you look at the survey, the FAA received a
> low score for pay and benefits, however the fact is the FAA is THE
> highest paying agency in the entire federal workforce. Furthermore the
> FAA has a relatively low percentage of college graduates. Where else in
> the government can thousands of employees get paid six figures with no
> formal education? I'll leave it for you to decide how truly objective
> the survey is.

Blame it on the controllers and the unions?? Do you realize
many of those FAA survey participants are neither?

What a limp dick lame ass excuse

Only a FAA manager would come up with a stupid ass response
like that.

Do you think maybe just maybe FAA management just SUCKS
CAMEL ASS??

Is that possible??

[Gig 601Xl Builder]

EMTAE wrote:
> Gig 601Xl Builder wrote:
>> EMTAE wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Rather than calling me a "Piece of ****" redneck why not address the
>>> FACTS??
>>>
>>> Why did the FAA score SO ****ING LOW???
>>>
>>
>> OK, well since you gave the link I looked at how they scored.
>>
>> One of the reasons they were so low in the ranking was the perceived
>> lack of
>>
>>
>> Support for Diversity
>> The support for diversity category measures the extent to which
>> employees believe that actions and policies of leadership and
>> management promote and respect diversity.
>>
>> Ranked 215 out of 222 agencies.
>>
>> That sort of undermines your theory doesn't it?
>
> No it does not.
>
> The out of control blind support for "Diversity" and political
> correctness IS the reason the FAA is so bad off

Prove it.

> Until hundreds die in a pink mist somewhere over America soon
>

And yet we have the safest skies in the world. And one day there will be
a terrible accident and the odds are there will be a white male pilot, a
white male controller with a white male supervisor involved. And the
accident won't have a thing to do with those peoples sex or race.

[Mike[_22_]]

"EMTAE" > wrote in message
...
<reposting what was snipped>
> Since JJ dared me to, I feel obligated to post the TRUTH about him so
> everyone can know the history behind this raving kook who has been
> spamming this NG for many years. As JJ claims to value the TRUTH so much,
> I'm sure he can appreciate all of it. Since much of the personal
> information has been posted by JJ himself, I really don't feel bad about
> posting it even though shining a light on this cockroach wouldn't bother
> me anyway. How I got all this information is pretty simple. While
> researching a subject in the archives the aviation NGs, I ran across an
> old post that was clearly JJs. A few more clicks provided his personal
> information such as name, employment, and location which he posted
> himself. I have a very old and good friend of mine who works near where
> he worked. This person is an inspector in the Atlanta area. It just so
> happens that inspectors fall under the same union as JJ's old union. He
> told me he had heard of JJ and he would make some inquiries about him and
> get back to me. Much of what I relate comes from him, who I consider a
> very reliable source.
>
> His real name is John A Johnson, and he lives in Dallas, GA. JJ is the
> epitome of a redneck. He drove a big honkin' redneck truck and carried
> himself as if he were the cock of the walk, but everyone else regarded him
> as a fat boorish individual. He refers to himself as JJ, so when he asks,
> "Who the *** is JJ", he very well knew HE was JJ. So obviously he was not
> only acting stupid (possibly not an act), but at least somewhat afraid of
> being revealed, but I'm sure that would be apparent to the most casual
> observer anyway. JJ claims "EXCELLENT and HONORABLE service to my
> country", but the real truth really can't be found in the National
> Archives. He was at one time a FAA employee. He does not appear to be a
> present FAA employee. As far as why he is not longer an FAA employee,
> details on that are a bit cloudy. JJ is 50 years old, which would not
> make him eligible for regular retirement. Rumors as to why he left
> include termination, medical retirement, or he quit rather than face
> termination. As the FAA doesn't disclose such information, rumors are all
> I have here and I'm not going to try and characterize them as anything
> but, however there does seem to be some basis for them. JJ is an admitted
> drug user (during the time of his FAA employment) and the FAA does
> administer random drug and alcohol tests to safety related employees.
> Medical retirement is also a popular option with employees like JJ. As
> such employees are largely worthless and counterproductive, the FAA
> doesn't scrutinize their medical retirement applications as well as they
> should. It's better for all concerned for them to leave anyway and as
> such this is a very popular option for union parasites. JJ is 50 and
> regular retirement is 55. That much I know for sure. So for whatever
> reason, JJ left the FAA early and there's not really too many "EXCELLENT
> and HONORABLE" explanations which could possibly account for this. His
> own explanation should be pretty amusing to be sure and I look forward to
> it assuming he will even try.
>
> JJ worked as a technician on navigational aid facilities in the Atlanta
> area (ILS, VOR, etc). I use the term "worked" very loosely here because
> that's not really how his peers described it. The way they described it
> was in actuality JJ spent most of his time sitting on his fat arse (and
> yes it is fat regardless of what he claims) and what little he did was in
> the union arena. JJ spent a lot of time ranting about "management",
> "minorities", and "gays" (he rarely used those terms on the last two, but
> you get the idea), filling out grievances and whatever other complaint
> paperwork he could get his hands on, attending union boondoggles, and
> anything else he could possibly do to get out of his assigned FAA duties
> while his coworkers constantly picked up his slack. JJ had aspirations of
> getting a real full time union position (there are a few genuine full time
> union positions), but he never rose above the rank of "useful idiot" in
> the union hierarchy. For those that have never ran across such a
> parasitic individual, you should know that there are a few people in the
> FAA who make a career out of simply being in the union, even though they
> are supposed to be a productive employee. The union fully protects them,
> and most managers look the other way. In that sense, JJ is right. FAA
> management is very inept when it comes to removing poor performing
> employees, but the vast majority of those employees are retained because
> of the wear their union membership on their sleeve and the union protects
> them. The fact that JJ remained an employee for so long is testament to
> it. What's certainly clear to me is that JJ actually epitomizes the
> behavior he attributes to "non-white males". I really can't say I was
> surprised. Bigots project their faults on others. That's why they are
> bigots to begin with.
>
> He will spend the rest of his fat useless life living a sedentary
> lifestyle as a government pensioner (even if he got fired he can still
> collect an annuity when he gets to 55). Coming from someone who
> constantly rants about the government, you may find that quite ironic.
> I'm sure he'll spend the majority of that time ranting his kookie thoughts
> on usenet to those who laugh at him. With any luck he will provide quite
> a number of years of entertainment before he dies of congestive heart
> failure, but the statistics aren't working in his favor. Fat, lazy, 50,
> and no real reason to leave the house doesn't work in his favor. Now that
> you know who he REALLY is, you can chuckle just a bit deeper and longer.
<repost end>



> You never answered the question about why the FAA scored so low in the
> 2007 Government employee survey? You continue to post lies and untruths
> and false data.
>
> I don't care what you say AT ALL because I know it's all a lie. You are
> talking out your ass and making false and disparaging comments about
> people with no basis of fact
>
> Now, answer the question.

Already did.

>
> Why did the FAA score so low in 2007 regarding employee morale??
>
> Or is it easier to shoot the messenger and spread lies about whoever you
> can to deviate yourself from facing the facts??
>
> You MUST be an ex FAA Manager. You must be. Lying piece of **** human
> cockroach **** bag **** face

Ah, look at all the silly profanities coming from the redneck. Isn't it
cute when a typical redneck gets spun up? It made my efforts well worth it.

If I'm a liar, prove it fat boi. Otherwise you're nothing more than a
redneck with a worthless redneck opinion.


> Go ahead. Tell us you are not either current or former FAA Management.
>
> Go ahead

Why would I do that? I'm not the one trying to conceal who I work for and
in what capacity.

> As far as drug use, I guess every FAA Manager who goes to some boondoggle
> and stays drunk and chases whores are not druggies huh? ALCOHOL is a DRUG
> dumb ass

What seems to be escaping your small redneck mind is the fact that consuming
illegal drugs even off duty is a fireable offense in the FAA. So tell us
again about your "HONORABLE" service, JJ.

> Whoever you are you are so full of **** your eyes are brown

Then prove me wrong, JJ. I can provide proof for everything I've asserted
as fact.

> Another question you did not address. Why does the FAA promote unqualified
> minorities and women into senior FAA management?

That's a loaded question, fat boi. Rephrase or go screw yourself.

>
> Why??


> Oh one more thing. If you check my newsgroup header it is not in Georgia.
> Wrong again numb nuts.
>
> What an idiot

It says nothing of the sort, JJ, but where you are posting from right this
minute is irrelevant.

Are you going to tell me your name isn't John A Johnson? Please tell me
that's what you're saying. You didn't even try to deny that which is a
tacit admission, JJ. It wouldn't really matter anyway as I can prove it.
All you're doing is trying to probe me for what proof I actually have
without denying it.

All you have to do is deny it, JJ. Deny your name is not John A Johnson.
Deny you were never a FAA employee in Atlanta. That's all you have to do
and I'll be glad to provide my proof. Anything else is a tacit admission,
JJ. What an idiot.

[Mike[_22_]]

"EMTAE" > wrote in message
...
> Gig 601Xl Builder wrote:
>> EMTAE wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Rather than calling me a "Piece of ****" redneck why not address the
>>> FACTS??
>>>
>>> Why did the FAA score SO ****ING LOW???
>>>
>>
>> OK, well since you gave the link I looked at how they scored.
>>
>> One of the reasons they were so low in the ranking was the perceived lack
>> of
>>
>>
>> Support for Diversity
>> The support for diversity category measures the extent to which employees
>> believe that actions and policies of leadership and management promote
>> and respect diversity.
>>
>> Ranked 215 out of 222 agencies.
>>
>> That sort of undermines your theory doesn't it?
>
> No it does not.
>
> The out of control blind support for "Diversity" and political correctness
> IS the reason the FAA is so bad off

Not so bad off since you've been fired, JJ. The black female who took your
place is doing a much better job.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.drugs.pot/browse_thread/thread/f9c45ba30e12c5a8/1e3502e2e70f40b9#1e3502e2e70f40b9

[Mike[_22_]]

"EMTAE" > wrote in message
...
> Mike wrote:
>> "Gig 601Xl Builder" > wrote in message
>> m...
>>> EMTAE wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rather than calling me a "Piece of ****" redneck why not address the
>>>> FACTS??
>>>>
>>>> Why did the FAA score SO ****ING LOW???
>>>>
>>>
>>> OK, well since you gave the link I looked at how they scored.
>>>
>>> One of the reasons they were so low in the ranking was the perceived
>>> lack of
>>>
>>>
>>> Support for Diversity
>>> The support for diversity category measures the extent to which
>>> employees believe that actions and policies of leadership and management
>>> promote and respect diversity.
>>>
>>> Ranked 215 out of 222 agencies.
>>>
>>> That sort of undermines your theory doesn't it?
>>
>> The reason they scored low in the first place was because right before
>> the survey controllers got a forced contract and other unions were facing
>> similar problems. If you look at the survey, the FAA received a low
>> score for pay and benefits, however the fact is the FAA is THE highest
>> paying agency in the entire federal workforce. Furthermore the FAA has a
>> relatively low percentage of college graduates. Where else in the
>> government can thousands of employees get paid six figures with no formal
>> education? I'll leave it for you to decide how truly objective the
>> survey is.
>
> Blame it on the controllers and the unions?? Do you realize many of those
> FAA survey participants are neither?

Do you realize the FAA has a higher percentage of union members than any
other government agency, by a margin that's wider than your ass?

You should lay off the pot, JJ. That stuff has turned you into a kook.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.drugs.pot/browse_thread/thread/f9c45ba30e12c5a8/1e3502e2e70f40b9#1e3502e2e70f40b9

[EMTAE[_3_]]

Mike wrote:

> It says nothing of the sort, JJ, but where you are posting from right
> this minute is irrelevant.
>
> Are you going to tell me your name isn't John A Johnson? Please tell me
> that's what you're saying. You didn't even try to deny that which is a
> tacit admission, JJ. It wouldn't really matter anyway as I can prove
> it. All you're doing is trying to probe me for what proof I actually
> have without denying it.
>
> All you have to do is deny it, JJ. Deny your name is not John A
> Johnson. Deny you were never a FAA employee in Atlanta. That's all you
> have to do and I'll be glad to provide my proof. Anything else is a
> tacit admission, JJ. What an idiot.

The effort you are displaying toward my posts is very
indicative of several things about your narcissistic
personality Mike

1. You are a former or current FAA Manager(But won't admit it)
2. You are either a minority or a white sycophant
3. You are Gay
4. You suck the Government TIT for subsistence
5. Your penis is small
6. You are a short man
7. You have been assimilated by the Government Borg and your
mind is Jell-O.
8. You think smoking a plant grown by God should ruin lives
and incarcerate millions of Americans but it's OK to suck
Budweiser by the swimming pool because the "Guvment" gets
some more tax for your TIT.
9. You think America is great because of GOVERNMENT
10. You love China

Go away Government Sycophant Flying Monkey Minion(GSFMM)
You bore me. I am done with you

<PLONK>

[Mike]

"EMTAE" > wrote in message
...
> Mike wrote:
>
>> It says nothing of the sort, JJ, but where you are posting from right
>> this minute is irrelevant.
>>
>> Are you going to tell me your name isn't John A Johnson? Please tell me
>> that's what you're saying. You didn't even try to deny that which is a
>> tacit admission, JJ. It wouldn't really matter anyway as I can prove it.
>> All you're doing is trying to probe me for what proof I actually have
>> without denying it.
>>
>> All you have to do is deny it, JJ. Deny your name is not John A Johnson.
>> Deny you were never a FAA employee in Atlanta. That's all you have to do
>> and I'll be glad to provide my proof. Anything else is a tacit
>> admission, JJ. What an idiot.
>
> The effort you are displaying toward my posts is very indicative of
> several things about your narcissistic personality Mike
>
> 1. You are a former or current FAA Manager(But won't admit it)

....sez the streetcorner kook who won't admit anything, including his own
lies which have now been revealed.

> 2. You are either a minority or a white sycophant

....sez the redneck bigot.

> 3. You are Gay

....sez Peterpan(that's what he calls himself) who has been scientifically
proven to be gay.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.aviation.piloting/browse_thread/thread/b1c16edf41aef/6a464ea104d71045?lnk=gst&q=#6a464ea104d71045

> 4. You suck the Government TIT for subsistence

....sez the parasitic government pensioner who never earned his pay as an
employee.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.aviation.misc/browse_thread/thread/9b25468e97237e93/c1b635aabdbe388b?lnk=st&q=#c1b635aabdbe388b

> 5. Your penis is small

....sez the fat boi whose subtaneous fat has transformed his pee-pee into a
mushroom cap.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fov6YsqwPII

> 6. You are a short man

....sez the kook who is a pathological liar.

> 7. You have been assimilated by the Government Borg and your mind is
> Jell-O.

....sez the lifelong government employee and pensioner.

> 8. You think smoking a plant grown by God should ruin lives and
> incarcerate millions of Americans but it's OK to suck Budweiser by the
> swimming pool because the "Guvment" gets some more tax for your TIT.

....sez the pot-head and frequent poster to all the druggie NGs.
http://groups.google.com/group/uk.politics.drugs/browse_thread/thread/2f658dd70d8c6c50/290e26fca571cb46#290e26fca571cb46

> 9. You think America is great because of GOVERNMENT

....sez the kook who has never received money from anywhere else.

> 10. You love China

....sez the pot-head who takes his family on a vacation to Amsterdam, just so
he can score some weed. (I'm not kidding).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-kERdeiAR8

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.drugs.pot/browse_thread/thread/2bec71d8443e4cb6/c3642590777a72e8#c3642590777a72e8

> Go away Government Sycophant Flying Monkey Minion(GSFMM)
> You bore me. I am done with you
>
> <PLONK>

Ah, sweet music.

Here's an actual video of the kook JJ he posted on youtube, if anyone can
stand to watch a fat redneck video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fov6YsqwPII

[Mark E. via AviationKB.com]

Mike wrote:

>
>Here's an actual video of the kook JJ he posted on youtube, if anyone can
>stand to watch a fat redneck video.
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fov6YsqwPII

OMG LMAO.

He looks exactly like those white male sycophants he's always ranting about.
Strange what the mentally ill do with too much free time.

pitiful fella, really.

--
Message posted via http://www.aviationkb.com

[No2]

Mark E. via AviationKB.com wrote:
> Mike wrote:
>
>> Here's an actual video of the kook JJ he posted on youtube, if anyone can
>> stand to watch a fat redneck video.
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fov6YsqwPII
>
> OMG LMAO.
>
> He looks exactly like those white male sycophants he's always ranting about.
> Strange what the mentally ill do with too much free time.
>
> pitiful fella, really.
>

**** You Mike

I looked at those links. A YouTube collection of a man and his family
enjoying life. So ****ing what??? (see ad hominem argument)

You are a pitiful piece of warm human excrement you know that???

You make fun of people(ad hominem argument)but you will never answer the
hard questions about air safety or FAA incompetence and malfeasance that
is out of control here in America

A person's looks or weight or age or sex or race or identity or work
background has nothing to do with the fact(ad hominem argument)that you
will not answer the questions regarding FAA management incompetence and
racism against experienced white males and the myriad of FAA lies being
heaped on the airlines and the American public.

You prove my point. You are a typical sycophant Government worker loser
(Trained very well at Palm Coast in FAA bull**** and ad hominem argument
techniques I might add). The problem is your FAA Management Palm Coast
sycophant training only works for STUPID PEOPLE

I am not going to ask you again to answer the questions I have submitted
regarding the FAA for the benefit of the pilots and readers of this
group. It is obvious you are an FAA employee and maybe even some useless
FAA manager but what is more obvious and dangerous and scary is IF you
work for the FAA you don't have the balls or the sense or the ability to
answer the hard questions about air safety in America

You validate without a doubt that you are a member of the group of
losers and idiots and incompetents running Air Safety oversight and the
FAA in America into the ****ter.

The FAA is one midair from being disbanded and purged and most FAA
managers are one midair from looking for new work(See NASA/Challenger)

So go ahead and lie and attack and disparage and obfuscate and deviate.
You prove my point 100 percent. You ARE a certified GSFMM. "Government
Sycophant Flying Monkey Minion"

http://retrocrush.buzznet.com/100monsters/94.html

You can shoot the messenger(ME)all day long but guess what? Those arrows
are hitting my armor and I continue to inform the American public each
day about the BS and lies in the FAA. Your attacks and lies are not
working. It only emboldens me and others who really care about Air
Safety more because deep down I know and you know and your bosses know
and all of us know you and the FAA are on the ropes and RUNNING SCARED.

Get ready for the day of reckoning for you and others like you in the
FAILED Aviation Administration is coming. And it won't be pretty

One more high visibility **** up on the FAA's watch and there
is no doubt Congress and the American people are going
to corn hole the FAA and sweep it clean like they did NASA after
Challenger. And I will be right there with them with tar and
pitch forks guaranteed. I am a GSFMM's worst nightmare.

Look in the mirror and practice your new career lines Mr.GSFMM

"You want fries with that"?????
"Do you want to biggie size that"???
"Do you need a shopping cart sir"??

Since you probably are some useless FAA Manager and just plain old dumb
as dirt here is some useful information for the readers of this
newsgroup of what YOU and others like YOU in the FAA do each and every
day you are backed into a corner with hard questions. When losers like
you are presented with important questions of substance about Air Safety
and FAA incompetence and racism against white males you use these
techniques so you can cover your pathetic little weasel asses and
protect your worthless Government empires.

An ad hominem argument, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin:
"argument to the man", "argument against the man") consists of replying
to an argument or factual claim by attacking or appealing to a
characteristic or belief of the person making the argument or claim,
rather than by addressing the substance of the argument or producing
evidence against the claim. The process of proving or disproving the
claim is thereby subverted, and the argumentum ad hominem works to
change the subject.

I know what you and the other losers like you in FAA management are
doing. You know why?? Because I am smarter than most FAA Managers(And
that don't take much DUH)

So **** for brains.........

ADDRESS THE SUBSTANCE OF THE ARGUMENT

Can you or will you?????

We are waiting

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXGhvoekY44